Re: [WISPA] How the FCC Proposes the Regulate Broadband

2010-05-27 Thread MDK
As I write, is it 1:40 AM, I'm tired as heck, but have been mulling this 
question for days, and have finally taken the time to do this.   First, to 
my self-motivated enemies who can't stand anything I say Nuts!, I'm 
right and I know it.   Now, for the rest, who are interested in more than 
just shallow mockery,  here's serious conversation on serious topics, and 
the excuse to dismiss me for those who can't bring themselves to be serious.

Some comments on the strategy for opposing FCC intervention.

As is highlighted below - and has been discussed at considerable length in 
other venues...   The NBP, the regulation of internet services, and net 
neutrality all hinge upon a couple of rather firm anchors.   As we know, 
the FCC lost in the courts when it attempted to simply re-write the intent 
of current law.The first anchor for implementation of anything is to 
surmount the law as it sits right now.Either by Congressional action, or 
by administratively bypassing it.

The current administration has demonstrated in several other areas they are 
willing to coordinate completely bypassing the legislative process, and 
regulate via administrative rule.   IE, agencies simply write new rules 
that force the intent of the administration, even if it conflicts with 
current law, or has no basis in law. There's considerable example and 
evidence of this, by the EPA and other agencies.

It would be my estimate that this is the approach the FCC will try - and it 
is coordinated directly, but unofficially, from the White House.   This 
approach has mixed support and resistance in Congress.   Some of the 
Democrats would prefer this, rather than Congress taking up a controversial 
topic.   However, it is legally iffy.   And, there's a majority in 
Congress which is mostly Republicans and some Democrats who actually oppose 
the FCC attempting to simply rule by fiat.   It's a turf thing, actually. 
Few in Congress are strongly supportive of enterprise, and the resistance is 
mostly about Congress objecting to the FCC usurping their role.

Thus, it would seem to be a poor strategy to rely on Congressional efforts 
or even lobbying Congress to proactively act - though it should be done - to 
oppose the FCC, perhaps by proactive legislation, to block the FCC from 
doing any of this. It's a poor strategy to depend on it happening, but 
that happening would be probably the best possible outcome - assuming the 
law passed would protect our freedom to be in business and STAY unregulated.

As I said above, there are some key pins on which this whole thing revolves, 
and it has been pointed out, that USF funding - and a re-write of that tax 
and spending is key.It's the carrot and stick approach.   Not quite 
the traditional meaning, but the carrot used to get you closer or to agree, 
so you'll get close enough to beat with the stick.

So, MONEY is the key.If there is no MONEY to buy your acceptance with, 
there is near universal industry opposition to regulation.In that 
situation, we could be political allies with, and benefit from the lobbying 
warchests of a wide array of players in the telecom and internet industries, 
as well as a wide array of both ideological and even some progressive 
institutions.

As long as there is money on the table - as long as any administration or 
agency or even Congress has the means to buy off resistance - there is no 
reliable massive block of resistance.   As was pointed out in other emails, 
an alliance with small and rural CLEC's and others is going to be shaky, 
because if the regulators put money on the table for them, they abandon the 
common defense and we're on our own.

For that matter, WISPA's membership and even just the readership of this 
list is extremely and deeply divided.   There are those who see the purpose 
of WISPA as one to lobby to repurpose or redirect the flow of that money to 
them.Yet, as pointed out later in the discussions on this list, that 
very funding means is going to be extremely anti-competitive, and result in 
near monopolies by area, region, etc.Support for USF funding to ISP's is 
100% at cross purposes to the best interests of our industry's many 
individual members.

WISPA has finally reached that point where it is no longer able to bridge 
this gap.   The gap is wide enough, the fence tall enough, or whatever 
metaphor you wish to choose, so that the choice literally has to be made. 
WISPA leadership has attempted diplomatically to attempt to tread both 
paths, but now they diverge. Either WISPA advocates for a patently 
anti-competitive industry subsidy, or else it become against such subsidy 
altogether.There is no future point where this straddling again narrows 
and the leadership can advocate both for USF money subsidy and still claim 
to be for ALL WISP's, and for the interests of all us in a free and 
competitive market.

At this point, since WISPA is representative of its members, it's time to 

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik routing/queing problem

2010-05-27 Thread Greg Ihnen
Did you upgrade to 4.9 Did you run an earlier version with this router with 
this same configuration? Have you tried regressing to an earlier version?

Did you post this issue to the MT forum?

Greg

On May 27, 2010, at 1:19 AM, Kevin Sullivan wrote:

 4.9
 - Original Message - 
 From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 12:18 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik routing/queing problem
 
 
 Also what firmware (sys routerboar pr)?
 
 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373
 
 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
 that counts.”
 --- Winston Churchill
 
 
 On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 What version of RouterOS are you running?
 
 Greg
 
 On May 26, 2010, at 12:46 PM, Kevin Sullivan wrote:
 
 I think I have found a legitimate bug.  I'm running an RB1000 that
 we put in service about 2 weeks ago (it replaced another RB1000 that was
 having similar problems).  Here is what is going on:
 
 Linux router  A - [ether1] RB1000 [ether3] ---
 Linux router B
 
 
 The RB1000 above is connected to the two hosts shown.
 Each link A   RB1000   B has latency ~1ms.  We are not using any
 Mikrotik wireless.
 
 A and B both know that they can reach each other through the RB1000
 (thanks
 to OSPF).
 
 A and B are Linux routers.  When I ping B from A (traffic going through
 the
 RB1000), I get no response.  When I log into B and tcpdump traffic, I 
 can
 see icmp echo request packets coming in from A, and echo reply packets
 going
 out to A.  Fine.  I then log into the RB1000 and packet sniff ether1 and
 ether3.
 
 ether1 packet sniff shows icmp request packets coming in.  ether3 shows
 icmp
 request packets going out, and icmp reply packets coming in.  However,
 the
 replies are not going out ether1.
 
 BUT after several minutes, A starts seeing replies.
 
 64 bytes from x.x.x.x: icmp_seq=1049 ttl=63 time=671216 ms
 64 bytes from x.x.x.x: icmp_seq=1095 ttl=63 time=628217 ms
 64 bytes from x.x.x.x: icmp_seq=1142 ttl=63 time=584217 ms
 64 bytes from x.x.x.x: icmp_seq=1188 ttl=63 time=541218 ms
 64 bytes from x.x.x.x: icmp_seq=1235 ttl=63 time=497234 ms
 
 the RB1000 has been queuing my ICMP packets for ~500 seconds!!
 
 I STOP pinging from A and packet sniff ether1 on the RB1000 again.  It 
 is
 STILL sending out queued ICMP replies from A, even though I am
 not sending requests anymore.
 
 Several minutes after I stop pinging from A, the RB1000 stops sending
 replies on ether1.
 
 Clients have been complaining for months about slow speeds passing
 traffic
 through this router.  I've also noticed high CPU utilization, even when
 normal CPU hungry tasks were turned off (one mangle rule, no queues, no
 proxy, no DNS, etc).   During the day, we see 70-80% CPU utilization.
 The
 previous router (same config) went to 100% utilization, which is why we
 replaced it.
 
 Regards,
 
 Kevin
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 
 
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

Re: [WISPA] Free Public WiFi

2010-05-27 Thread Stuart Pierce

I like  - FBI Surveillance Van #1

-- Original Message --
From: RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date:  Wed, 26 May 2010 22:20:05 -0400

I woudlnt know but some say it costs to get the good stuff.

On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com wrote:
 Aren't the two synonymous?

 Greg

 On May 26, 2010, at 8:29 PM, RickG wrote:

 Try Free Porn and see how many connect!

 On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com 
 wrote:
 For fun I name all the private wifi routers to an SSID of Virus.  The
 attempts to connect have dropped considerably.



 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Patrick Leary
 Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 12:24 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Free Public WiFi

 ...a little OT, but, after being party to all the free craziness of
 Earthlink, etc. just the title Free Public Wi-Fi makes me break out in
 hives...


 Patrick Leary
 Aperto Networks
 813.426.4230 mobile

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Steve Barnes
 Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 9:06 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: [WISPA] Free Public WiFi

 I am embarrassed to ask here but I am going to anyway.

 I have some customers laptops that have been here lately with the Free
 Public WiFi ssid on them.  I know that this is a Microsoft screw up on
 the Zero Wireless Connections.  I have made the stations so that they
 can only connect to a AP in the future.  But the Free Public WiFi SSID
 still shows up on the systems even when the Wireless card is turned off.
 I have removed all preferred SSIDs and still nothing.  Any one know how
 to kill this out of a Win XP system. (without going to Linux)

 Steve Barnes
 RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service


 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 





Sent via the WebMail system at avolve.net


 
   




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] [WISPA Members] WISPA Regional Meeting Registration Site Updated

2010-05-27 Thread Rick Harnish
I have just taken the Registration page live for the WISPA Regional Meeting
in St. Louis on July 21st and 22nd.  I will update the show schedule as more
details are known.http://wispaslrm.eventbrite.com
http://wispaslrm.eventbrite.com

 

I didn't realize I had post dated the Sales Start Date to June 1.  I have
now amended it so that sales start today.

 

Thanks,

 

Rick Harnish

President

WISPA

260-307-4000 cell

866-317-2851 WISPA Office

Skype: rick.harnish.

rharn...@wispa.org

 

___

WISPA Membership Mailing List

---


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Free Public WiFi

2010-05-27 Thread Steve Barnes
Now I would connect to that just to see what kind of a mess I could get into.  
(Probably using  someone else's computer though)

Steve Barnes
RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Stuart Pierce
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 7:34 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Free Public WiFi


I like  - FBI Surveillance Van #1

-- Original Message --
From: RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date:  Wed, 26 May 2010 22:20:05 -0400

I woudlnt know but some say it costs to get the good stuff.

On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Greg Ihnen os10ru...@gmail.com wrote:
 Aren't the two synonymous?

 Greg

 On May 26, 2010, at 8:29 PM, RickG wrote:

 Try Free Porn and see how many connect!

 On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com 
 wrote:
 For fun I name all the private wifi routers to an SSID of Virus.  
 The attempts to connect have dropped considerably.



 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
 [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Leary
 Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 12:24 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Free Public WiFi

 ...a little OT, but, after being party to all the free craziness 
 of Earthlink, etc. just the title Free Public Wi-Fi makes me 
 break out in hives...


 Patrick Leary
 Aperto Networks
 813.426.4230 mobile

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
 [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Steve Barnes
 Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 9:06 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: [WISPA] Free Public WiFi

 I am embarrassed to ask here but I am going to anyway.

 I have some customers laptops that have been here lately with the 
 Free Public WiFi ssid on them.  I know that this is a Microsoft 
 screw up on the Zero Wireless Connections.  I have made the 
 stations so that they can only connect to a AP in the future.  But 
 the Free Public WiFi SSID still shows up on the systems even when the 
 Wireless card is turned off.
 I have removed all preferred SSIDs and still nothing.  Any one know 
 how to kill this out of a Win XP system. (without going to Linux)

 Steve Barnes
 RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service


 ---
 -
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 ---
 -
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 ---
 -
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 ---
 -
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 ---
 -
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 ---
 -

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 -
 ---
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 -
 ---

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



---
-
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
---
-
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 





Sent via the WebMail system at avolve.net


 
   




WISPA Wants You! Join today!

Re: [WISPA] How the FCC Proposes the Regulate Broadband

2010-05-27 Thread Brian Webster
Mark,
This is an interesting and well thought out proposal. Thank you for
taking the time to post and for also not making it politically charged. It
might be a good idea to create a condensed version of this proposal with
simple bullet points. Politicians and other government officials have a
short attention span so a  Readers Digest version of this same idea would
help in gathering interest and support for the concept. If they express
serious interest, a more detailed description can be presented to them.
Having to read your full description will get lost on those who skim ideas
in the interest of saving time. A condensed version would also be easier to
present to the proper WISPA committees to begin discussion. I know quite a
few WISPA members do not read the general list in as much detail as they do
other lists. I'd be willing to present your concept to the proper committees
for consideration.



Brian

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of MDK
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 5:55 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] How the FCC Proposes the Regulate Broadband

As I write, is it 1:40 AM, I'm tired as heck, but have been mulling this 
question for days, and have finally taken the time to do this.   First, to 
my self-motivated enemies who can't stand anything I say Nuts!, I'm 
right and I know it.   Now, for the rest, who are interested in more than 
just shallow mockery,  here's serious conversation on serious topics, and 
the excuse to dismiss me for those who can't bring themselves to be serious.

Some comments on the strategy for opposing FCC intervention.

As is highlighted below - and has been discussed at considerable length in 
other venues...   The NBP, the regulation of internet services, and net 
neutrality all hinge upon a couple of rather firm anchors.   As we know, 
the FCC lost in the courts when it attempted to simply re-write the intent 
of current law.The first anchor for implementation of anything is to 
surmount the law as it sits right now.Either by Congressional action, or

by administratively bypassing it.

The current administration has demonstrated in several other areas they are 
willing to coordinate completely bypassing the legislative process, and 
regulate via administrative rule.   IE, agencies simply write new rules 
that force the intent of the administration, even if it conflicts with 
current law, or has no basis in law. There's considerable example and 
evidence of this, by the EPA and other agencies.

It would be my estimate that this is the approach the FCC will try - and it 
is coordinated directly, but unofficially, from the White House.   This 
approach has mixed support and resistance in Congress.   Some of the 
Democrats would prefer this, rather than Congress taking up a controversial 
topic.   However, it is legally iffy.   And, there's a majority in 
Congress which is mostly Republicans and some Democrats who actually oppose 
the FCC attempting to simply rule by fiat.   It's a turf thing, actually. 
Few in Congress are strongly supportive of enterprise, and the resistance is

mostly about Congress objecting to the FCC usurping their role.

Thus, it would seem to be a poor strategy to rely on Congressional efforts 
or even lobbying Congress to proactively act - though it should be done - to

oppose the FCC, perhaps by proactive legislation, to block the FCC from 
doing any of this. It's a poor strategy to depend on it happening, but 
that happening would be probably the best possible outcome - assuming the 
law passed would protect our freedom to be in business and STAY unregulated.

As I said above, there are some key pins on which this whole thing revolves,

and it has been pointed out, that USF funding - and a re-write of that tax 
and spending is key.It's the carrot and stick approach.   Not quite 
the traditional meaning, but the carrot used to get you closer or to agree, 
so you'll get close enough to beat with the stick.

So, MONEY is the key.If there is no MONEY to buy your acceptance with, 
there is near universal industry opposition to regulation.In that 
situation, we could be political allies with, and benefit from the lobbying 
warchests of a wide array of players in the telecom and internet industries,

as well as a wide array of both ideological and even some progressive 
institutions.

As long as there is money on the table - as long as any administration or 
agency or even Congress has the means to buy off resistance - there is no 
reliable massive block of resistance.   As was pointed out in other emails, 
an alliance with small and rural CLEC's and others is going to be shaky, 
because if the regulators put money on the table for them, they abandon the 
common defense and we're on our own.

For that matter, WISPA's membership and even just the readership of this 
list is extremely and deeply divided.   There are those who see 

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik routing/queing problem

2010-05-27 Thread RickG
Auto neg can cause problems.

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:51 AM, Kevin Sullivan
kevin.sulli...@alyrica.net wrote:
 No, it's a gig link, set to auto neg.

 Kevin
 - Original Message -
 From: RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 6:55 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik routing/queing problem


 I havent seen that on my RB1000. Do you have the ports locked down to
 a set rate?

 On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Kevin Sullivan
 kevin.sulli...@alyrica.net wrote:
 I think I have found a legitimate bug. I'm running an RB1000 that
 we put in service about 2 weeks ago (it replaced another RB1000 that was
 having similar problems). Here is what is going on:

 Linux router A - [ether1] RB1000 [ether3] --- Linux
 router B


 The RB1000 above is connected to the two hosts shown.
 Each link A   RB1000   B has latency ~1ms. We are not using any
 Mikrotik wireless.

 A and B both know that they can reach each other through the RB1000
 (thanks
 to OSPF).

 A and B are Linux routers. When I ping B from A (traffic going through the
 RB1000), I get no response. When I log into B and tcpdump traffic, I can
 see icmp echo request packets coming in from A, and echo reply packets
 going
 out to A. Fine. I then log into the RB1000 and packet sniff ether1 and
 ether3.

 ether1 packet sniff shows icmp request packets coming in. ether3 shows
 icmp
 request packets going out, and icmp reply packets coming in. However, the
 replies are not going out ether1.

 BUT after several minutes, A starts seeing replies.

 64 bytes from x.x.x.x: icmp_seq=1049 ttl=63 time=671216 ms
 64 bytes from x.x.x.x: icmp_seq=1095 ttl=63 time=628217 ms
 64 bytes from x.x.x.x: icmp_seq=1142 ttl=63 time=584217 ms
 64 bytes from x.x.x.x: icmp_seq=1188 ttl=63 time=541218 ms
 64 bytes from x.x.x.x: icmp_seq=1235 ttl=63 time=497234 ms

 the RB1000 has been queuing my ICMP packets for ~500 seconds!!

 I STOP pinging from A and packet sniff ether1 on the RB1000 again. It is
 STILL sending out queued ICMP replies from A, even though I am
 not sending requests anymore.

 Several minutes after I stop pinging from A, the RB1000 stops sending
 replies on ether1.

 Clients have been complaining for months about slow speeds passing traffic
 through this router. I've also noticed high CPU utilization, even when
 normal CPU hungry tasks were turned off (one mangle rule, no queues, no
 proxy, no DNS, etc). During the day, we see 70-80% CPU utilization. The
 previous router (same config) went to 100% utilization, which is why we
 replaced it.

 Regards,

 Kevin







 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik routing/queing problem

2010-05-27 Thread Leon D. Zetekoff

On 5/27/2010 10:04 AM, RickG wrote:

Auto neg can cause problems.

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:51 AM, Kevin Sullivan
kevin.sulli...@alyrica.net  wrote:
   

No, it's a gig link, set to auto neg.
 

snip

auto-neg definitely the problem especially if non gig on other side. 
Lock both sides down


Leon
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2897 - Release Date: 05/26/10 
02:25:00



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] How the FCC Proposes the Regulate Broadband

2010-05-27 Thread David E. Smith
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 04:55, MDK rea...@muddyfrogwater.us wrote:

[ snip: a lot of interesting ideas with which I personally disagree
but they're still interesting ideas ]

 This idea recognizes and codifies that subsidy = threat of regulation and
 that free markets with a competitive environment do NOT need any regulation
 to provide workable services to consumers.

Does WISPA have any mechanism in place for polling the membership, to
see whether MDK's ideas really have the kind of support he thinks they
do? I think the membership is large enough that it's not necessarily
fair/wise to assume that nine board members can accurately assess
these things.

MDK: ever consider running for a spot on the board? That's one way to
be sure WISPA is listening to your views. :)

David Smith
MVN.net



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread finkle dinkle
So, I've got space in a building in So. Cal with a lot of neighbors
with crappy connections. In the beginning, I wanted to bring in a gig
PTP from the datacenter 12 miles away... I'm not a salesman, I think
with the bandwidth I have available at the DC + the of the PTP, I
could've made everyone in the building happy, at least 20 tenants if I
could convince them.. doubt I could.

Anyway, I have potential access to the roof, I'd have to ask.

Are there any laws if I want to sell service ?

If I want to provide service to lets just say 50 clients (not in the
building but through wireless), are there devices that dont have to
rely on LOS ?

I'm just trying to understand if this all went along well, how many
devices would I need to mount up on the roof to support 20-50 clients
externally with the devices and which devices..

I'm looking to sell the bandwidth for a relatively low price, undercut
wimax and not strictly looking for profit but looking to be the point
guy for other tech operations for these potential clients..

Also, to the people who have good access to bandwidth or even not..
how much are you looking at from all your cost to what you actually
charge (not including administrative) but lets assume your bandwidth
costs are 8k/month with the point to point to the datacenter +
1000mbit commit. I know I could do better but what are we looking at
here, if the total cost to get the bandwidth, less the equipment to my
office building at 8 bux a meg, how much should I be selling it ? any
recommendations ?

I do not want to be a company like towerstream where I sell 8 megs for
800/MRC, i'm looking to charge more like 25 bux per meg... Is my model
right or wrong ?



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread Robert West
No laws against selling it.  You just have to stay within the FCC power
limits and regulations and you're smooth.  LOS is cheap to use, no line of
site is expensive but doable.

Bob-


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of finkle dinkle
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 11:57 AM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

So, I've got space in a building in So. Cal with a lot of neighbors
with crappy connections. In the beginning, I wanted to bring in a gig
PTP from the datacenter 12 miles away... I'm not a salesman, I think
with the bandwidth I have available at the DC + the of the PTP, I
could've made everyone in the building happy, at least 20 tenants if I
could convince them.. doubt I could.

Anyway, I have potential access to the roof, I'd have to ask.

Are there any laws if I want to sell service ?

If I want to provide service to lets just say 50 clients (not in the
building but through wireless), are there devices that dont have to
rely on LOS ?

I'm just trying to understand if this all went along well, how many
devices would I need to mount up on the roof to support 20-50 clients
externally with the devices and which devices..

I'm looking to sell the bandwidth for a relatively low price, undercut
wimax and not strictly looking for profit but looking to be the point
guy for other tech operations for these potential clients..

Also, to the people who have good access to bandwidth or even not..
how much are you looking at from all your cost to what you actually
charge (not including administrative) but lets assume your bandwidth
costs are 8k/month with the point to point to the datacenter +
1000mbit commit. I know I could do better but what are we looking at
here, if the total cost to get the bandwidth, less the equipment to my
office building at 8 bux a meg, how much should I be selling it ? any
recommendations ?

I do not want to be a company like towerstream where I sell 8 megs for
800/MRC, i'm looking to charge more like 25 bux per meg... Is my model
right or wrong ?




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] How the FCC Proposes the Regulate Broadband SURVEY

2010-05-27 Thread Rick Harnish
Done

Please take the survey.  http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/XC5DF7F  There are 10
questions on two pages.  You must answer all statements with Agree,
Undecided or Disagree to proceed.

I would have liked to have asked whether the responders are a member or a
non-member but we are only allowed 10 questions per survey and I didn't have
room.

Thanks,
Rick Harnish

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of David E. Smith
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 11:29 AM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] How the FCC Proposes the Regulate Broadband
 
 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 04:55, MDK rea...@muddyfrogwater.us wrote:
 
 [ snip: a lot of interesting ideas with which I personally disagree
 but they're still interesting ideas ]
 
  This idea recognizes and codifies that subsidy = threat of regulation
 and
  that free markets with a competitive environment do NOT need any
 regulation
  to provide workable services to consumers.
 
 Does WISPA have any mechanism in place for polling the membership, to
 see whether MDK's ideas really have the kind of support he thinks they
 do? I think the membership is large enough that it's not necessarily
 fair/wise to assume that nine board members can accurately assess
 these things.
 
 MDK: ever consider running for a spot on the board? That's one way to
 be sure WISPA is listening to your views. :)
 
 David Smith
 MVN.net
 
 
 ---
 -
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 ---
 -
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread jp
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 08:56:53AM -0700, finkle dinkle wrote:
 So, I've got space in a building in So. Cal with a lot of neighbors
 with crappy connections. In the beginning, I wanted to bring in a gig
 PTP from the datacenter 12 miles away... I'm not a salesman, I think
 with the bandwidth I have available at the DC + the of the PTP, I
 could've made everyone in the building happy, at least 20 tenants if I
 could convince them.. doubt I could.
 
 Anyway, I have potential access to the roof, I'd have to ask.
 
 Are there any laws if I want to sell service ?

Yes. You have to file a bunch of stuff to be Calea compliant. You also need to 
file a 477 with the FCC on a regular interval. In order to professionally 
install 
the radios we all use outdoors, you should be familar with the FCC part15 rules 
especially with regard to power output, interference, etc... If you get into 
VOIP, there 
are CPNI filings which are very serious not to skip. For working on a roof top, 
if there 
is a risk of falling, you may be required to have appropriately increased 
insurance 
and provide such proof to the building management. Even if you are self 
employed, there 
may be expectations on part of the building owner for you to obey OSHA safety 
guidelines 
working up there. Local codes may also require wiring and grounding to be done 
according 
to NEC, which means you should study that and/or hire an electrician for 
inspection/guidance.

In an urban area, there is no simple answer for what works for NLOS. Depends on 
interference, construction materials, physics, etc...

If you can't make more money than what you are doing, it's a negative effect on 
your 
present business activities. I have no idea what you can or should charge.


 If I want to provide service to lets just say 50 clients (not in the
 building but through wireless), are there devices that dont have to
 rely on LOS ?
 
 I'm just trying to understand if this all went along well, how many
 devices would I need to mount up on the roof to support 20-50 clients
 externally with the devices and which devices..
 
 I'm looking to sell the bandwidth for a relatively low price, undercut
 wimax and not strictly looking for profit but looking to be the point
 guy for other tech operations for these potential clients..
 
 Also, to the people who have good access to bandwidth or even not..
 how much are you looking at from all your cost to what you actually
 charge (not including administrative) but lets assume your bandwidth
 costs are 8k/month with the point to point to the datacenter +
 1000mbit commit. I know I could do better but what are we looking at
 here, if the total cost to get the bandwidth, less the equipment to my
 office building at 8 bux a meg, how much should I be selling it ? any
 recommendations ?
 
 I do not want to be a company like towerstream where I sell 8 megs for
 800/MRC, i'm looking to charge more like 25 bux per meg... Is my model
 right or wrong ?
 
 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

-- 
/*
Jason Philbrook   |   Midcoast Internet Solutions - Wireless and DSL
KB1IOJ|   Broadband Internet Access, Dialup, and Hosting 
 http://f64.nu/   |   for Midcoast Mainehttp://www.midcoast.com/
*/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread Jack Unger
My first recommendation would be to legally change your name from Finkle 
Dinkle to something that sounds a little more business-like. I'd 
recommend something like Joe Smith or Bob Jones.

finkle dinkle wrote:
 So, I've got space in a building in So. Cal with a lot of neighbors
 with crappy connections. In the beginning, I wanted to bring in a gig
 PTP from the datacenter 12 miles away... I'm not a salesman, I think
 with the bandwidth I have available at the DC + the of the PTP, I
 could've made everyone in the building happy, at least 20 tenants if I
 could convince them.. doubt I could.

 Anyway, I have potential access to the roof, I'd have to ask.

 Are there any laws if I want to sell service ?

 If I want to provide service to lets just say 50 clients (not in the
 building but through wireless), are there devices that dont have to
 rely on LOS ?

 I'm just trying to understand if this all went along well, how many
 devices would I need to mount up on the roof to support 20-50 clients
 externally with the devices and which devices..

 I'm looking to sell the bandwidth for a relatively low price, undercut
 wimax and not strictly looking for profit but looking to be the point
 guy for other tech operations for these potential clients..

 Also, to the people who have good access to bandwidth or even not..
 how much are you looking at from all your cost to what you actually
 charge (not including administrative) but lets assume your bandwidth
 costs are 8k/month with the point to point to the datacenter +
 1000mbit commit. I know I could do better but what are we looking at
 here, if the total cost to get the bandwidth, less the equipment to my
 office building at 8 bux a meg, how much should I be selling it ? any
 recommendations ?

 I do not want to be a company like towerstream where I sell 8 megs for
 800/MRC, i'm looking to charge more like 25 bux per meg... Is my model
 right or wrong ?


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


   

-- 
Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
Network Design - Technical Training - Technical Writing
Serving the Broadband Wireless, Networking and Telecom Communities since 1993
www.ask-wi.com  818-227-4220  jun...@ask-wi.com







WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread Randy Cosby
Sheesh you guys, you're scaring him AND making fun of his name.  Welcome 
to the club :)


-- 
Randy Cosby
Vice President
InfoWest, Inc

435-674-0165 x 2010

http://www.infowest.com/

As knowledge increases, the verdict of yesterday must be reversed
today, and in the long run the most positive authority is the
least to be trusted. - Hugh Nibley




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] How the FCC Proposes the Regulate Broadband SURVEY

2010-05-27 Thread Leon D. Zetekoff

On 5/27/2010 12:13 PM, Rick Harnish wrote:

Done

Please take the survey.  http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/XC5DF7F  There are 10
questions on two pages.  You must answer all statements with Agree,
Undecided or Disagree to proceed.

I would have liked to have asked whether the responders are a member or a
non-member but we are only allowed 10 questions per survey and I didn't have
room.

T
   

Hi RIck...can the grammar be improved?

leon
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2897 - Release Date: 05/26/10 
02:25:00



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread finkle dinkle
Thanks for the suggestion about changing my name, I'll be sure to
download the forms, submit them and change my name to Jack Ungerton.

Well, I know the capabilities of a NanoBridge M5 now as I've tested it
for a friend but it was done for two buildings around 500 feet in
distance.

Is something as basic as a NanoBridge M5 doable or if you start
getting into the commercial sector, do you start requiring better
equipment ?

I haven't been on a roof in a long time so I dont clearly remember
what is visible from the top but I'm sure it's a lot.

I just want to be able to provide decent pricing to the people and
businesses here with symmetrical bandwidth.  I haven't had time to
figure out administrative costs and how I could provide support if
there are any issues though.

I would love to have something set up to provide service for a radius
of a few miles but I'm not sure that's something I should be messing
with.  I pretty much am curious on if I were to sell a few hundred
megs, what type of devices and how many devices at what cost will it
be ?

Thanks

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Randy Cosby dco...@infowest.com wrote:
 Sheesh you guys, you're scaring him AND making fun of his name.  Welcome
 to the club :)


 --
 Randy Cosby
 Vice President
 InfoWest, Inc

 435-674-0165 x 2010

 http://www.infowest.com/

 As knowledge increases, the verdict of yesterday must be reversed
 today, and in the long run the most positive authority is the
 least to be trusted. - Hugh Nibley



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread lakeland
Yeah. What the heck guys?

If it was that involved 3/4's of the people on this list would be unemployed or 
doing something else.

Someone needs to layout the bootstrap version for him.  I can't do it on a 
blackberry

-B-
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-Original Message-
From: Randy Cosby dco...@infowest.com
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 10:33:25 
To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

Sheesh you guys, you're scaring him AND making fun of his name.  Welcome 
to the club :)


-- 
Randy Cosby
Vice President
InfoWest, Inc

435-674-0165 x 2010

http://www.infowest.com/

As knowledge increases, the verdict of yesterday must be reversed
today, and in the long run the most positive authority is the
least to be trusted. - Hugh Nibley




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] How the FCC Proposes the Regulate Broadband SURVEY

2010-05-27 Thread Josh Luthman
Punctuation, too.  I can't answer most of these because I can't grasp
what's being asked.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue that counts.”
--- Winston Churchill



On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Leon D. Zetekoff wa4...@arrl.net wrote:
 On 5/27/2010 12:13 PM, Rick Harnish wrote:

 Done

 Please take the survey.  http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/XC5DF7F  There are
 10
 questions on two pages.  You must answer all statements with Agree,
 Undecided or Disagree to proceed.

 I would have liked to have asked whether the responders are a member or a
 non-member but we are only allowed 10 questions per survey and I didn't
 have
 room.

 T


 Hi RIck...can the grammar be improved?

 leon

 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2897 - Release Date: 05/26/10
 02:25:00



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread Josh Luthman
100 Mbit doesn't exist in ptmp wireless.

If your goal is to do a 12 mile gigabit link (which is going to be
impossible in 1 hop) and then offer service to people inside the
building, is there any existing wiring?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue that counts.”
--- Winston Churchill



On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:43 PM, finkle dinkle char...@gmail.com wrote:
 Thanks for the suggestion about changing my name, I'll be sure to
 download the forms, submit them and change my name to Jack Ungerton.

 Well, I know the capabilities of a NanoBridge M5 now as I've tested it
 for a friend but it was done for two buildings around 500 feet in
 distance.

 Is something as basic as a NanoBridge M5 doable or if you start
 getting into the commercial sector, do you start requiring better
 equipment ?

 I haven't been on a roof in a long time so I dont clearly remember
 what is visible from the top but I'm sure it's a lot.

 I just want to be able to provide decent pricing to the people and
 businesses here with symmetrical bandwidth.  I haven't had time to
 figure out administrative costs and how I could provide support if
 there are any issues though.

 I would love to have something set up to provide service for a radius
 of a few miles but I'm not sure that's something I should be messing
 with.  I pretty much am curious on if I were to sell a few hundred
 megs, what type of devices and how many devices at what cost will it
 be ?

 Thanks

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Randy Cosby dco...@infowest.com wrote:
 Sheesh you guys, you're scaring him AND making fun of his name.  Welcome
 to the club :)


 --
 Randy Cosby
 Vice President
 InfoWest, Inc

 435-674-0165 x 2010

 http://www.infowest.com/

 As knowledge increases, the verdict of yesterday must be reversed
 today, and in the long run the most positive authority is the
 least to be trusted. - Hugh Nibley



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] How the FCC Proposes the Regulate Broadband SURVEY

2010-05-27 Thread Rick Harnish
It won't happen today.  My day is shot.  I will forward this to the Board.
Maybe someone else can step in and assist.

Thanks,
Rick

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Josh Luthman
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 12:46 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] How the FCC Proposes the Regulate Broadband SURVEY
 
 Punctuation, too.  I can't answer most of these because I can't grasp
 what's being asked.
 
 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373
 
 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
 continue that counts.”
 --- Winston Churchill
 
 
 
 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Leon D. Zetekoff wa4...@arrl.net
 wrote:
  On 5/27/2010 12:13 PM, Rick Harnish wrote:
 
  Done
 
  Please take the survey.  http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/XC5DF7F
  There are
  10
  questions on two pages.  You must answer all statements with Agree,
  Undecided or Disagree to proceed.
 
  I would have liked to have asked whether the responders are a member
 or a
  non-member but we are only allowed 10 questions per survey and I
 didn't
  have
  room.
 
  T
 
 
  Hi RIck...can the grammar be improved?
 
  leon
 
  No virus found in this outgoing message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
  Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2897 - Release Date:
 05/26/10
  02:25:00
 
 
 
  -
 ---
  WISPA Wants You! Join today!
  http://signup.wispa.org/
  -
 ---
 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
 
 
 
 ---
 -
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 ---
 -
 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread Justin Wilson
Nice introduction to the WISPA community. Make fun of the name. I even
recommended this person check out WISPA from the Ubiquity forums.Anyhow,
welcome.  I would suggest reading through the archives for some good
discussions on things.

Justin
-- 
Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
http://www.mtin.net/blog
Wisp Consulting ­ Tower Climbing ­ Network Support



From: Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 09:28:35 -0700
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

My first recommendation would be to legally change your name from Finkle
Dinkle to something that sounds a little more business-like. I'd
recommend something like Joe Smith or Bob Jones.

finkle dinkle wrote:
 So, I've got space in a building in So. Cal with a lot of neighbors
 with crappy connections. In the beginning, I wanted to bring in a gig
 PTP from the datacenter 12 miles away... I'm not a salesman, I think
 with the bandwidth I have available at the DC + the of the PTP, I
 could've made everyone in the building happy, at least 20 tenants if I
 could convince them.. doubt I could.

 Anyway, I have potential access to the roof, I'd have to ask.

 Are there any laws if I want to sell service ?

 If I want to provide service to lets just say 50 clients (not in the
 building but through wireless), are there devices that dont have to
 rely on LOS ?

 I'm just trying to understand if this all went along well, how many
 devices would I need to mount up on the roof to support 20-50 clients
 externally with the devices and which devices..

 I'm looking to sell the bandwidth for a relatively low price, undercut
 wimax and not strictly looking for profit but looking to be the point
 guy for other tech operations for these potential clients..

 Also, to the people who have good access to bandwidth or even not..
 how much are you looking at from all your cost to what you actually
 charge (not including administrative) but lets assume your bandwidth
 costs are 8k/month with the point to point to the datacenter +
 1000mbit commit. I know I could do better but what are we looking at
 here, if the total cost to get the bandwidth, less the equipment to my
 office building at 8 bux a meg, how much should I be selling it ? any
 recommendations ?

 I do not want to be a company like towerstream where I sell 8 megs for
 800/MRC, i'm looking to charge more like 25 bux per meg... Is my model
 right or wrong ?


 

 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


   

-- 
Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
Network Design - Technical Training - Technical Writing
Serving the Broadband Wireless, Networking and Telecom Communities since
1993
www.ask-wi.com  818-227-4220  jun...@ask-wi.com








WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread Robert West
That's why I had to change my name from Richard Head.  That last name was a
curse on this list. Now I have a last name that gets me more respect.

-Richard Face




-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Justin Wilson
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 12:58 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

Nice introduction to the WISPA community. Make fun of the name. I even
recommended this person check out WISPA from the Ubiquity forums.Anyhow,
welcome.  I would suggest reading through the archives for some good
discussions on things.

Justin
-- 
Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
http://www.mtin.net/blog
Wisp Consulting - Tower Climbing - Network Support



From: Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 09:28:35 -0700
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

My first recommendation would be to legally change your name from Finkle
Dinkle to something that sounds a little more business-like. I'd
recommend something like Joe Smith or Bob Jones.

finkle dinkle wrote:
 So, I've got space in a building in So. Cal with a lot of neighbors
 with crappy connections. In the beginning, I wanted to bring in a gig
 PTP from the datacenter 12 miles away... I'm not a salesman, I think
 with the bandwidth I have available at the DC + the of the PTP, I
 could've made everyone in the building happy, at least 20 tenants if I
 could convince them.. doubt I could.

 Anyway, I have potential access to the roof, I'd have to ask.

 Are there any laws if I want to sell service ?

 If I want to provide service to lets just say 50 clients (not in the
 building but through wireless), are there devices that dont have to
 rely on LOS ?

 I'm just trying to understand if this all went along well, how many
 devices would I need to mount up on the roof to support 20-50 clients
 externally with the devices and which devices..

 I'm looking to sell the bandwidth for a relatively low price, undercut
 wimax and not strictly looking for profit but looking to be the point
 guy for other tech operations for these potential clients..

 Also, to the people who have good access to bandwidth or even not..
 how much are you looking at from all your cost to what you actually
 charge (not including administrative) but lets assume your bandwidth
 costs are 8k/month with the point to point to the datacenter +
 1000mbit commit. I know I could do better but what are we looking at
 here, if the total cost to get the bandwidth, less the equipment to my
 office building at 8 bux a meg, how much should I be selling it ? any
 recommendations ?

 I do not want to be a company like towerstream where I sell 8 megs for
 800/MRC, i'm looking to charge more like 25 bux per meg... Is my model
 right or wrong ?


 


 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 


  
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


   

-- 
Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
Network Design - Technical Training - Technical Writing
Serving the Broadband Wireless, Networking and Telecom Communities since
1993
www.ask-wi.com  818-227-4220  jun...@ask-wi.com








WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread finkle dinkle
Justin, appreciate your suggestion.  I've been looking around and will
continue to.

Josh, the gbit ptp will be done through fiber to the building, then
whoever in the building wants service.. will pay set up to get set up
with ethernet or fiber to my office.

I know I could get enough business inside the building to cover half
the cost of everything because I'm pretty sure there is a company here
with quite a few T1's, overpaying and not getting what they deserve.
I've always been a proponent of maxing stuff out so I will be a great
benefit to the tenants.

So if I'm able to set something up externally, I may be able to
actually break even and profit some,  I actually know I could profit
but I want this to be more of a service to the people who are unable
to get anything decent out here.

Thanks

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Justin Wilson li...@mtin.net wrote:
    Nice introduction to the WISPA community. Make fun of the name. I even
 recommended this person check out WISPA from the Ubiquity forums.    Anyhow,
 welcome.  I would suggest reading through the archives for some good
 discussions on things.

    Justin
 --
 Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
 http://www.mtin.net/blog
 Wisp Consulting ­ Tower Climbing ­ Network Support



 From: Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com
 Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 09:28:35 -0700
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 My first recommendation would be to legally change your name from Finkle
 Dinkle to something that sounds a little more business-like. I'd
 recommend something like Joe Smith or Bob Jones.

 finkle dinkle wrote:
 So, I've got space in a building in So. Cal with a lot of neighbors
 with crappy connections. In the beginning, I wanted to bring in a gig
 PTP from the datacenter 12 miles away... I'm not a salesman, I think
 with the bandwidth I have available at the DC + the of the PTP, I
 could've made everyone in the building happy, at least 20 tenants if I
 could convince them.. doubt I could.

 Anyway, I have potential access to the roof, I'd have to ask.

 Are there any laws if I want to sell service ?

 If I want to provide service to lets just say 50 clients (not in the
 building but through wireless), are there devices that dont have to
 rely on LOS ?

 I'm just trying to understand if this all went along well, how many
 devices would I need to mount up on the roof to support 20-50 clients
 externally with the devices and which devices..

 I'm looking to sell the bandwidth for a relatively low price, undercut
 wimax and not strictly looking for profit but looking to be the point
 guy for other tech operations for these potential clients..

 Also, to the people who have good access to bandwidth or even not..
 how much are you looking at from all your cost to what you actually
 charge (not including administrative) but lets assume your bandwidth
 costs are 8k/month with the point to point to the datacenter +
 1000mbit commit. I know I could do better but what are we looking at
 here, if the total cost to get the bandwidth, less the equipment to my
 office building at 8 bux a meg, how much should I be selling it ? any
 recommendations ?

 I do not want to be a company like towerstream where I sell 8 megs for
 800/MRC, i'm looking to charge more like 25 bux per meg... Is my model
 right or wrong ?



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 --
 Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
 Network Design - Technical Training - Technical Writing
 Serving the Broadband Wireless, Networking and Telecom Communities since
 1993
 www.ask-wi.com  818-227-4220  jun...@ask-wi.com






 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread Robert West
Then you could provide the access via dsl in the building.  That would be
the logical route to go I think.

-Richard

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of finkle dinkle
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 1:08 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

Justin, appreciate your suggestion.  I've been looking around and will
continue to.

Josh, the gbit ptp will be done through fiber to the building, then
whoever in the building wants service.. will pay set up to get set up
with ethernet or fiber to my office.

I know I could get enough business inside the building to cover half
the cost of everything because I'm pretty sure there is a company here
with quite a few T1's, overpaying and not getting what they deserve.
I've always been a proponent of maxing stuff out so I will be a great
benefit to the tenants.

So if I'm able to set something up externally, I may be able to
actually break even and profit some,  I actually know I could profit
but I want this to be more of a service to the people who are unable
to get anything decent out here.

Thanks

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Justin Wilson li...@mtin.net wrote:
    Nice introduction to the WISPA community. Make fun of the name. I even
 recommended this person check out WISPA from the Ubiquity forums.  
 Anyhow,
 welcome.  I would suggest reading through the archives for some good
 discussions on things.

    Justin
 --
 Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
 http://www.mtin.net/blog
 Wisp Consulting ­ Tower Climbing ­ Network Support



 From: Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com
 Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 09:28:35 -0700
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 My first recommendation would be to legally change your name from Finkle
 Dinkle to something that sounds a little more business-like. I'd
 recommend something like Joe Smith or Bob Jones.

 finkle dinkle wrote:
 So, I've got space in a building in So. Cal with a lot of neighbors
 with crappy connections. In the beginning, I wanted to bring in a gig
 PTP from the datacenter 12 miles away... I'm not a salesman, I think
 with the bandwidth I have available at the DC + the of the PTP, I
 could've made everyone in the building happy, at least 20 tenants if I
 could convince them.. doubt I could.

 Anyway, I have potential access to the roof, I'd have to ask.

 Are there any laws if I want to sell service ?

 If I want to provide service to lets just say 50 clients (not in the
 building but through wireless), are there devices that dont have to
 rely on LOS ?

 I'm just trying to understand if this all went along well, how many
 devices would I need to mount up on the roof to support 20-50 clients
 externally with the devices and which devices..

 I'm looking to sell the bandwidth for a relatively low price, undercut
 wimax and not strictly looking for profit but looking to be the point
 guy for other tech operations for these potential clients..

 Also, to the people who have good access to bandwidth or even not..
 how much are you looking at from all your cost to what you actually
 charge (not including administrative) but lets assume your bandwidth
 costs are 8k/month with the point to point to the datacenter +
 1000mbit commit. I know I could do better but what are we looking at
 here, if the total cost to get the bandwidth, less the equipment to my
 office building at 8 bux a meg, how much should I be selling it ? any
 recommendations ?

 I do not want to be a company like towerstream where I sell 8 megs for
 800/MRC, i'm looking to charge more like 25 bux per meg... Is my model
 right or wrong ?






 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/





 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 --
 Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
 Network Design - Technical Training - Technical Writing
 Serving the Broadband Wireless, Networking and Telecom Communities since
 1993
 www.ask-wi.com  818-227-4220  jun...@ask-wi.com








 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/




 WISPA 

Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread Jack Unger




"Ungerton" sounds very nice; it's right up there with "Ungerville"
which is way ahead of "Ungerberg". Unfortunately, "Ungerstanding" is
already taken. To avoid confusion, you might want to consider a
different first name... maybe "Biff" or "Roger". 

finkle dinkle wrote:

  Thanks for the suggestion about changing my name, I'll be sure to
download the forms, submit them and change my name to "Jack Ungerton."

Well, I know the capabilities of a NanoBridge M5 now as I've tested it
for a friend but it was done for two buildings around 500 feet in
distance.

Is something as basic as a NanoBridge M5 doable or if you start
getting into the "commercial" sector, do you start requiring better
equipment ?

I haven't been on a roof in a long time so I dont clearly remember
what is visible from the top but I'm sure it's a lot.

I just want to be able to provide decent pricing to the people and
businesses here with symmetrical bandwidth.  I haven't had time to
figure out administrative costs and how I could provide support if
there are any issues though.

I would love to have something set up to provide service for a radius
of a few miles but I'm not sure that's something I should be messing
with.  I pretty much am curious on if I were to sell a few hundred
megs, what type of devices and how many devices at what cost will it
be ?

Thanks

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Randy Cosby dco...@infowest.com wrote:
  
  
Sheesh you guys, you're scaring him AND making fun of his name. Welcome
to the club :)


--
Randy Cosby
Vice President
InfoWest, Inc

435-674-0165 x 2010

http://www.infowest.com/

"As knowledge increases, the verdict of yesterday must be reversed
today, and in the long run the most positive authority is the
least to be trusted." - Hugh Nibley




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


  
  


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


  


-- 
Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
Network Design - Technical Training - Technical Writing
Serving the Broadband Wireless, Networking and Telecom Communities since 1993
www.ask-wi.com  818-227-4220  jun...@ask-wi.com









WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread Jerry Richardson
There are a few considerations to make before heading down this path.
1. What are you selling against? DSL, Cable, 3G, Satellite
2. What speeds are available via these services
3. What is your terrain like - trees, hills, valley, desert, etc
4. What is the max distance you are looking to cover - 1, 5, 10 miles?
5. What speeds do you want to deliver - 1.5, 3.0, 10, 20 Mbps
6. You said symmetrical speeds - why? Pretty uncommon for residential service
7. Are you prepared to get little sleep, give up most of your free time for at 
least the forst 2-3 months?
8. If you are doing this to break even, don't bother. You are only doing your 
customers a disservice because you will get tired/bored/sick of losing money 
and shut it down. 
9. If you want to make this profitable, plan on trying to get some business 
customers - they are worth muvh more.

Jerry

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of finkle dinkle
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 8:57 AM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

So, I've got space in a building in So. Cal with a lot of neighbors
with crappy connections. In the beginning, I wanted to bring in a gig
PTP from the datacenter 12 miles away... I'm not a salesman, I think
with the bandwidth I have available at the DC + the of the PTP, I
could've made everyone in the building happy, at least 20 tenants if I
could convince them.. doubt I could.

Anyway, I have potential access to the roof, I'd have to ask.

Are there any laws if I want to sell service ?

If I want to provide service to lets just say 50 clients (not in the
building but through wireless), are there devices that dont have to
rely on LOS ?

I'm just trying to understand if this all went along well, how many
devices would I need to mount up on the roof to support 20-50 clients
externally with the devices and which devices..

I'm looking to sell the bandwidth for a relatively low price, undercut
wimax and not strictly looking for profit but looking to be the point
guy for other tech operations for these potential clients..

Also, to the people who have good access to bandwidth or even not..
how much are you looking at from all your cost to what you actually
charge (not including administrative) but lets assume your bandwidth
costs are 8k/month with the point to point to the datacenter +
1000mbit commit. I know I could do better but what are we looking at
here, if the total cost to get the bandwidth, less the equipment to my
office building at 8 bux a meg, how much should I be selling it ? any
recommendations ?

I do not want to be a company like towerstream where I sell 8 megs for
800/MRC, i'm looking to charge more like 25 bux per meg... Is my model
right or wrong ?



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] How the FCC Proposes the Regulate Broadband

2010-05-27 Thread jp
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 02:55:21AM -0700, MDK wrote:
 As long as there is money on the table - as long as any administration or 
 agency or even Congress has the means to buy off resistance - there is no 
 reliable massive block of resistance.   As was pointed out in other emails, 
 an alliance with small and rural CLEC's and others is going to be shaky, 
 because if the regulators put money on the table for them, they abandon the 
 common defense and we're on our own.

Yes, I expect USF money to be used as bait in how this plays out.

 Next, we need to address fundamental questions - Ideas must be sellable to 
 Congress, they must obtain at least a modicum of support,  and they should 
 be equitable to all - putting free market principles to work.It must not 
 institute permanent subsidy, which discourages the establishment of business 
 models which are fundamentally sound WITHOUT public money.

I see no reason to have permanent USF subsidy. It is money down the toilet over 
the long 
run and a tax that seriously hinders people's ability to afford communications 
services. 
A big part of current USF money goes to switching which I see as an 
antiquated 
hierarchy where small rural towns have their own switch, with all it's 
maintenance and 
support. With the advent of cheap high capacity fiber created by ARRA projects 
and 
private upgrades, smaller digital switches, wholesale access to switch 
partitions, and 
VOIP, there is no technical reason to permanently subsidize modern distributed 
switching. If permanent support for switching were tapered off, the rural 
phone 
companies could find cheaper ways to do voice switching. The cellcos almost all 
have 
some sort of architecture where all their sites in the state go back to single 
state-wide switches. When not used for switching, permanent USF pays for 
monopoly 
infrastructure that discourages rural competition by irrationally priced 
services.

 4.  No ILEC is ever eligible for any subsidy within the boundaries of it's 
 incumbency, whether it is expanding broadband to unserved portions of its 
 incumbency or not.Whether or not CLEC status should be included should 
 be a subject of debate.

CLECs tend to be doing stuff that meets a need the ILECs aren't filling. I'm 
fine with 
non-permanent support to that.

 5.  That any financial incentive consist solely as a refundable tax rebate 
 per consumer serviced per month,  with the consumers being defined as those 
 who reside in an area currently without broadband, or in an area where 
 infrastructure does not currently exist to serve at least 95% of all 
 residences within that area.Area definition should be tied to local 
 trade areas.Consumers would be defined as customers of the ISP, be it 
 residential, business, or organization - like schools, businesses, or even 
 other ISP's.
 6.  Rebate eligibility expires upon:   2 years after a 3rd provider or 2nd 
 different technology covers at least 95% of all consumers within the 
 defined areas.( example,  DSL access is limited to a smallish rural 
 area, so the 1st and 2nd WISP can both claim rebates per consumer, but the 
 DSL provider cannot unless it expands to reach 95% of the people.   WISP's 
 cannot qualify EITHER, unless or until they can cover 95%.   Even if 2 
 WISP's fully cover,  rebates continue until a third joins  - then the 
 trigger allows that WISP subsidy for 2 years,, or the telco rolls out 
 universal DSL, at which the telco and WISP's continue for 2 years and then 
 expires.   Even if one/any/all go out of business after this threshold is 
 crossed, the expiration is permanent,)

A tax rebate would be highly preferable to USF, as it would be a reduction in 
taxation 
rather than an increase in taxation. Either way, non-permanent support is the 
only thing 
I can advocate.

I like the idea of non-permanent support for unserved/underserved areas. My 
state's 
ConnectME fund is looking at a one-time ISP payment (per customer) to support 
high-cost 
installations to unserved locations. The details of how much and under what 
conditions 
are undecided, but it would address the high CPE/installation costs that plague 
broadband expansion and would not cause long term dependence on government. 
This would 
be an alternative to the present system of government funded infrastructure 
projects. 
This would be less apt to stir a hornets nest of capitalism versus government 
funded 
project overbuilding, which is more and more apt to happen. 

 10.  That ALL infrastructure investment be fully expensable -as in 100% 
 write-off in year one, as it concerns taxes.Basically, that puts every 
 ISP in the position of being able to write off and not be taxed on growing 
 or expansion.This should be permanent tax policy for EVERYONE, 
 everywhere.

This has some precedent. Something like the §179 which lets the self employed 
fully 
deduct big SUVs and work trucks. This was meant to help small businesses and 
the auto 

Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread Jeremie Chism
I was thinking the same thing. Use a mini dslam on the free pairs to  
get Internet in the rooms. Ptp to the building and dsl to the customer.

Sent from my iPhone

On May 27, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just- 
micro.com wrote:

 Then you could provide the access via dsl in the building.  That  
 would be
 the logical route to go I think.

 -Richard

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]  
 On
 Behalf Of finkle dinkle
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 1:08 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Justin, appreciate your suggestion.  I've been looking around and will
 continue to.

 Josh, the gbit ptp will be done through fiber to the building, then
 whoever in the building wants service.. will pay set up to get set up
 with ethernet or fiber to my office.

 I know I could get enough business inside the building to cover half
 the cost of everything because I'm pretty sure there is a company here
 with quite a few T1's, overpaying and not getting what they deserve.
 I've always been a proponent of maxing stuff out so I will be a great
 benefit to the tenants.

 So if I'm able to set something up externally, I may be able to
 actually break even and profit some,  I actually know I could profit
 but I want this to be more of a service to the people who are unable
 to get anything decent out here.

 Thanks

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Justin Wilson li...@mtin.net wrote:
Nice introduction to the WISPA community. Make fun of the name.  
 I even
 recommended this person check out WISPA from the Ubiquity forums.
  Anyhow,
 welcome.  I would suggest reading through the archives for some good
 discussions on things.

Justin
 --
 Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
 http://www.mtin.net/blog
 Wisp Consulting  Tower Climbing  Network Support



 From: Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com
 Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 09:28:35 -0700
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 My first recommendation would be to legally change your name from  
 Finkle
 Dinkle to something that sounds a little more business-like. I'd
 recommend something like Joe Smith or Bob Jones.

 finkle dinkle wrote:
 So, I've got space in a building in So. Cal with a lot of neighbors
 with crappy connections. In the beginning, I wanted to bring in a  
 gig
 PTP from the datacenter 12 miles away... I'm not a salesman, I think
 with the bandwidth I have available at the DC + the of the PTP, I
 could've made everyone in the building happy, at least 20 tenants  
 if I
 could convince them.. doubt I could.

 Anyway, I have potential access to the roof, I'd have to ask.

 Are there any laws if I want to sell service ?

 If I want to provide service to lets just say 50 clients (not in the
 building but through wireless), are there devices that dont have to
 rely on LOS ?

 I'm just trying to understand if this all went along well, how many
 devices would I need to mount up on the roof to support 20-50  
 clients
 externally with the devices and which devices..

 I'm looking to sell the bandwidth for a relatively low price,  
 undercut
 wimax and not strictly looking for profit but looking to be the  
 point
 guy for other tech operations for these potential clients..

 Also, to the people who have good access to bandwidth or even not..
 how much are you looking at from all your cost to what you actually
 charge (not including administrative) but lets assume your bandwidth
 costs are 8k/month with the point to point to the datacenter +
 1000mbit commit. I know I could do better but what are we looking at
 here, if the total cost to get the bandwidth, less the equipment  
 to my
 office building at 8 bux a meg, how much should I be selling it ?  
 any
 recommendations ?

 I do not want to be a company like towerstream where I sell 8 megs  
 for
 800/MRC, i'm looking to charge more like 25 bux per meg... Is my  
 model
 right or wrong ?




 --- 
 --- 
 --
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


 --- 
 --- 
 --
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 --
 Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
 Network Design - Technical Training - Technical Writing
 Serving the Broadband Wireless, Networking and Telecom Communities  
 since
 1993
 www.ask-wi.com  818-227-4220  jun...@ask-wi.com







 --- 
 --- 
 --
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 --- 
 --- 
 --
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 

Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread Jeremie Chism
If you haven't been in this business you probably don't fully  
understand the work involved so I agree that if your not making money  
it won't last long. Especially those 7am calls because the Internet  
isn't working (even though it may have nothing to do with your  
service) and the customer who does perpetual speed tests and as soon  
as he doesn't get his speed ( even though he knows it is best effort  
and not dedicated) wants you to come out. I use expensive equipment to  
minimize problems but there are so many things outside of your  
control. Be willing to work and have thick skin. If it was easy  
everbody would do it.

Sent from my iPhone

On May 27, 2010, at 12:08 PM, finkle dinkle char...@gmail.com wrote:

 Justin, appreciate your suggestion.  I've been looking around and will
 continue to.

 Josh, the gbit ptp will be done through fiber to the building, then
 whoever in the building wants service.. will pay set up to get set up
 with ethernet or fiber to my office.

 I know I could get enough business inside the building to cover half
 the cost of everything because I'm pretty sure there is a company here
 with quite a few T1's, overpaying and not getting what they deserve.
 I've always been a proponent of maxing stuff out so I will be a great
 benefit to the tenants.

 So if I'm able to set something up externally, I may be able to
 actually break even and profit some,  I actually know I could profit
 but I want this to be more of a service to the people who are unable
 to get anything decent out here.

 Thanks

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Justin Wilson li...@mtin.net wrote:
Nice introduction to the WISPA community. Make fun of the name.  
 I even
 recommended this person check out WISPA from the Ubiquity  
 forums.Anyhow,
 welcome.  I would suggest reading through the archives for some good
 discussions on things.

Justin
 --
 Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
 http://www.mtin.net/blog
 Wisp Consulting  Tower Climbing  Network Support



 From: Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com
 Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 09:28:35 -0700
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 My first recommendation would be to legally change your name from  
 Finkle
 Dinkle to something that sounds a little more business-like. I'd
 recommend something like Joe Smith or Bob Jones.

 finkle dinkle wrote:
 So, I've got space in a building in So. Cal with a lot of neighbors
 with crappy connections. In the beginning, I wanted to bring in a  
 gig
 PTP from the datacenter 12 miles away... I'm not a salesman, I think
 with the bandwidth I have available at the DC + the of the PTP, I
 could've made everyone in the building happy, at least 20 tenants  
 if I
 could convince them.. doubt I could.

 Anyway, I have potential access to the roof, I'd have to ask.

 Are there any laws if I want to sell service ?

 If I want to provide service to lets just say 50 clients (not in the
 building but through wireless), are there devices that dont have to
 rely on LOS ?

 I'm just trying to understand if this all went along well, how many
 devices would I need to mount up on the roof to support 20-50  
 clients
 externally with the devices and which devices..

 I'm looking to sell the bandwidth for a relatively low price,  
 undercut
 wimax and not strictly looking for profit but looking to be the  
 point
 guy for other tech operations for these potential clients..

 Also, to the people who have good access to bandwidth or even not..
 how much are you looking at from all your cost to what you actually
 charge (not including administrative) but lets assume your bandwidth
 costs are 8k/month with the point to point to the datacenter +
 1000mbit commit. I know I could do better but what are we looking at
 here, if the total cost to get the bandwidth, less the equipment  
 to my
 office building at 8 bux a meg, how much should I be selling it ?  
 any
 recommendations ?

 I do not want to be a company like towerstream where I sell 8 megs  
 for
 800/MRC, i'm looking to charge more like 25 bux per meg... Is my  
 model
 right or wrong ?



 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 --
 Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
 Network Design - Technical Training - Technical Writing
 Serving the Broadband Wireless, Networking and Telecom Communities  
 since
 1993
 www.ask-wi.com  818-227-4220  jun...@ask-wi.com






 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 ---
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --- 
 --- 
 

Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread Bret Clark
On 05/27/2010 01:23 PM, Jeremie Chism wrote:
 and the customer who does perpetual speed tests and as soon
 as he doesn't get his speed ( even though he knows it is best effort
 and not dedicated) wants you to come out.

Wait a minute we have that customer too...so he's using you for a 
connection as well ;)!



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread Jerry Richardson
Like this: http://netsys-direct.com/vdsl_products.php

Bring your bandwidth to the Telco room and connect to your router
Connect router to VDSL switch next to the telephone punch blocks 
Cross connect from the VDSL switch to the punch block on a pair to the 
customers unit
Install a modem in the customer unit. 

Depending on the distance/condition of the existing phone line you can get up 
to 25Mbps without running new wires.




-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Jeremie Chism
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 10:18 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

I was thinking the same thing. Use a mini dslam on the free pairs to  
get Internet in the rooms. Ptp to the building and dsl to the customer.

Sent from my iPhone

On May 27, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just- 
micro.com wrote:

 Then you could provide the access via dsl in the building.  That  
 would be
 the logical route to go I think.

 -Richard

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]  
 On
 Behalf Of finkle dinkle
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 1:08 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Justin, appreciate your suggestion.  I've been looking around and will
 continue to.

 Josh, the gbit ptp will be done through fiber to the building, then
 whoever in the building wants service.. will pay set up to get set up
 with ethernet or fiber to my office.

 I know I could get enough business inside the building to cover half
 the cost of everything because I'm pretty sure there is a company here
 with quite a few T1's, overpaying and not getting what they deserve.
 I've always been a proponent of maxing stuff out so I will be a great
 benefit to the tenants.

 So if I'm able to set something up externally, I may be able to
 actually break even and profit some,  I actually know I could profit
 but I want this to be more of a service to the people who are unable
 to get anything decent out here.

 Thanks

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Justin Wilson li...@mtin.net wrote:
Nice introduction to the WISPA community. Make fun of the name.  
 I even
 recommended this person check out WISPA from the Ubiquity forums.
  Anyhow,
 welcome.  I would suggest reading through the archives for some good
 discussions on things.

Justin
 --
 Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
 http://www.mtin.net/blog
 Wisp Consulting  Tower Climbing  Network Support



 From: Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com
 Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 09:28:35 -0700
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 My first recommendation would be to legally change your name from  
 Finkle
 Dinkle to something that sounds a little more business-like. I'd
 recommend something like Joe Smith or Bob Jones.

 finkle dinkle wrote:
 So, I've got space in a building in So. Cal with a lot of neighbors
 with crappy connections. In the beginning, I wanted to bring in a  
 gig
 PTP from the datacenter 12 miles away... I'm not a salesman, I think
 with the bandwidth I have available at the DC + the of the PTP, I
 could've made everyone in the building happy, at least 20 tenants  
 if I
 could convince them.. doubt I could.

 Anyway, I have potential access to the roof, I'd have to ask.

 Are there any laws if I want to sell service ?

 If I want to provide service to lets just say 50 clients (not in the
 building but through wireless), are there devices that dont have to
 rely on LOS ?

 I'm just trying to understand if this all went along well, how many
 devices would I need to mount up on the roof to support 20-50  
 clients
 externally with the devices and which devices..

 I'm looking to sell the bandwidth for a relatively low price,  
 undercut
 wimax and not strictly looking for profit but looking to be the  
 point
 guy for other tech operations for these potential clients..

 Also, to the people who have good access to bandwidth or even not..
 how much are you looking at from all your cost to what you actually
 charge (not including administrative) but lets assume your bandwidth
 costs are 8k/month with the point to point to the datacenter +
 1000mbit commit. I know I could do better but what are we looking at
 here, if the total cost to get the bandwidth, less the equipment  
 to my
 office building at 8 bux a meg, how much should I be selling it ?  
 any
 recommendations ?

 I do not want to be a company like towerstream where I sell 8 megs  
 for
 800/MRC, i'm looking to charge more like 25 bux per meg... Is my  
 model
 right or wrong ?




 --- 
 --- 
 --
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


 --- 
 --- 
 --
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 

Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread Jeremie Chism
I knew when he asked me about load balancing routers something was up.  
I won't fight you over him that's for sure. Haha.

Sent from my iPhone

On May 27, 2010, at 12:26 PM, Bret Clark bcl...@spectraaccess.com  
wrote:

 On 05/27/2010 01:23 PM, Jeremie Chism wrote:
 and the customer who does perpetual speed tests and as soon
 as he doesn't get his speed ( even though he knows it is best effort
 and not dedicated) wants you to come out.

 Wait a minute we have that customer too...so he's using you for a
 connection as well ;)!


 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread finkle dinkle
1/2) UVerse is coming soon, box has been outside for 6 months on,
neighbors can get it but not the building yet.  6mbit max dsl and 28/3
possible cable modem but it's usually unstable.
3) if I want to sell LOS, it's pretty flat if I recall, I dont know to
what degree I can shoot LOS though, it may be smaller than I remember.
4) maybe 5 miles, would love 10.
5) want to be able to scale.. 50 megs each way would be great, 100
megs would be better (doubt I will have a customer for 100/100 but who
knows)
6) if I could profit off it, why wouldn't I cater to the people who do
want the symmetrical speeds, residential or business -- I have no
discrimination towards people who work from home, like uploading
pictures and working, I will obviously have to figure something out
about file sharing.
7) I already get little sleep anyway ;) no I sleep well and very
little amount of people nag me.  I guess I'd have to learn to deal
with it.
8/9)  It's sort of like a service where I'm able to offer them a lot
more than just wireless service.  I could pretty much upsell them on
everything else, referrals and stuff.  With the potential clients I
have lined up for inside the building, If i could get two 50/50
customers which I KNOW I could, I will do well.


I never thought about using the existing phone lines in the building..
I wonder how ATT would react to that once they're ready to launch
UVerse inside.  I do like the ability to be able reach Maximum Speeds
of 100 Mbps Symmetrical at distances up to 1,000 feet (300 m)  as
said on some of those VDSL modems but it's all maximum theoretical
speeds anyway.

I know I could differentiate myself from these bigger companies
because of the possible level of Enterprise support I could offer,
for example.. Offering the bigger companies space in the cage at the
datacenter with service to allow them to set their servers offsite but
pretty much be considered LAN since I could just send it via the PTP
Fiber link.  Also, I could obviously link up to any provider in Los
Angeles via the meet me rooms.  I'd probably plug into Hurricane
Electric since they're unbelievably cheap but there are Premium
Bandwidth Mix's out there that aren't too expensive and I think I
could make a pretty good amount of money doing this.

Richard, thinking about changing my name to Wilmington Wellington
3rd.. perhaps I could get money at me with that sort of a name.


On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Jerry Richardson
jrichard...@aircloud.com wrote:
 There are a few considerations to make before heading down this path.
 1. What are you selling against? DSL, Cable, 3G, Satellite
 2. What speeds are available via these services
 3. What is your terrain like - trees, hills, valley, desert, etc
 4. What is the max distance you are looking to cover - 1, 5, 10 miles?
 5. What speeds do you want to deliver - 1.5, 3.0, 10, 20 Mbps
 6. You said symmetrical speeds - why? Pretty uncommon for residential service
 7. Are you prepared to get little sleep, give up most of your free time for 
 at least the forst 2-3 months?
 8. If you are doing this to break even, don't bother. You are only doing your 
 customers a disservice because you will get tired/bored/sick of losing money 
 and shut it down.
 9. If you want to make this profitable, plan on trying to get some business 
 customers - they are worth muvh more.

 Jerry

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
 Behalf Of finkle dinkle
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 8:57 AM
 To: wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 So, I've got space in a building in So. Cal with a lot of neighbors
 with crappy connections. In the beginning, I wanted to bring in a gig
 PTP from the datacenter 12 miles away... I'm not a salesman, I think
 with the bandwidth I have available at the DC + the of the PTP, I
 could've made everyone in the building happy, at least 20 tenants if I
 could convince them.. doubt I could.

 Anyway, I have potential access to the roof, I'd have to ask.

 Are there any laws if I want to sell service ?

 If I want to provide service to lets just say 50 clients (not in the
 building but through wireless), are there devices that dont have to
 rely on LOS ?

 I'm just trying to understand if this all went along well, how many
 devices would I need to mount up on the roof to support 20-50 clients
 externally with the devices and which devices..

 I'm looking to sell the bandwidth for a relatively low price, undercut
 wimax and not strictly looking for profit but looking to be the point
 guy for other tech operations for these potential clients..

 Also, to the people who have good access to bandwidth or even not..
 how much are you looking at from all your cost to what you actually
 charge (not including administrative) but lets assume your bandwidth
 costs are 8k/month with the point to point to the datacenter +
 1000mbit commit. I know I could do better but what are we looking at
 here, if the total 

[WISPA] Dragonwave Horizon Quantum

2010-05-27 Thread Paolo Di Francesco
Hi all

I am curious to know if anybody tried this product. Any comment?

Another question: can I migrate from Horizon Compact to Quantum or
better to invest directly into the quantum?

Thank you in advance.

P.S. most of the links should be 1+1 or with some form of redundancy

-- 


Ing. Paolo Di Francesco

Teleinform s.r.l.
Sede Legale: Via Francesco Paolo Di Blasi 1, 90144 Palermo
Unita' Operativa: Via Regione Siciliana 49, 90046 Monreale (Palermo)
Tel: +39-091-6408576, +39-091-6404501
Fax: +39-091-6406200

http://www.wikitel.it
http://www.teleinform.com






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread Josh Luthman
I remember those days.  Glad that ended 3 years ago, myself.

On 5/27/10, finkle dinkle char...@gmail.com wrote:
 1/2) UVerse is coming soon, box has been outside for 6 months on,
 neighbors can get it but not the building yet.  6mbit max dsl and 28/3
 possible cable modem but it's usually unstable.
 3) if I want to sell LOS, it's pretty flat if I recall, I dont know to
 what degree I can shoot LOS though, it may be smaller than I remember.
 4) maybe 5 miles, would love 10.
 5) want to be able to scale.. 50 megs each way would be great, 100
 megs would be better (doubt I will have a customer for 100/100 but who
 knows)
 6) if I could profit off it, why wouldn't I cater to the people who do
 want the symmetrical speeds, residential or business -- I have no
 discrimination towards people who work from home, like uploading
 pictures and working, I will obviously have to figure something out
 about file sharing.
 7) I already get little sleep anyway ;) no I sleep well and very
 little amount of people nag me.  I guess I'd have to learn to deal
 with it.
 8/9)  It's sort of like a service where I'm able to offer them a lot
 more than just wireless service.  I could pretty much upsell them on
 everything else, referrals and stuff.  With the potential clients I
 have lined up for inside the building, If i could get two 50/50
 customers which I KNOW I could, I will do well.


 I never thought about using the existing phone lines in the building..
 I wonder how ATT would react to that once they're ready to launch
 UVerse inside.  I do like the ability to be able reach Maximum Speeds
 of 100 Mbps Symmetrical at distances up to 1,000 feet (300 m)  as
 said on some of those VDSL modems but it's all maximum theoretical
 speeds anyway.

 I know I could differentiate myself from these bigger companies
 because of the possible level of Enterprise support I could offer,
 for example.. Offering the bigger companies space in the cage at the
 datacenter with service to allow them to set their servers offsite but
 pretty much be considered LAN since I could just send it via the PTP
 Fiber link.  Also, I could obviously link up to any provider in Los
 Angeles via the meet me rooms.  I'd probably plug into Hurricane
 Electric since they're unbelievably cheap but there are Premium
 Bandwidth Mix's out there that aren't too expensive and I think I
 could make a pretty good amount of money doing this.

 Richard, thinking about changing my name to Wilmington Wellington
 3rd.. perhaps I could get money at me with that sort of a name.


 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Jerry Richardson
 jrichard...@aircloud.com wrote:
 There are a few considerations to make before heading down this path.
 1. What are you selling against? DSL, Cable, 3G, Satellite
 2. What speeds are available via these services
 3. What is your terrain like - trees, hills, valley, desert, etc
 4. What is the max distance you are looking to cover - 1, 5, 10 miles?
 5. What speeds do you want to deliver - 1.5, 3.0, 10, 20 Mbps
 6. You said symmetrical speeds - why? Pretty uncommon for residential
 service
 7. Are you prepared to get little sleep, give up most of your free time
 for at least the forst 2-3 months?
 8. If you are doing this to break even, don't bother. You are only doing
 your customers a disservice because you will get tired/bored/sick of
 losing money and shut it down.
 9. If you want to make this profitable, plan on trying to get some
 business customers - they are worth muvh more.

 Jerry

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of finkle dinkle
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 8:57 AM
 To: wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 So, I've got space in a building in So. Cal with a lot of neighbors
 with crappy connections. In the beginning, I wanted to bring in a gig
 PTP from the datacenter 12 miles away... I'm not a salesman, I think
 with the bandwidth I have available at the DC + the of the PTP, I
 could've made everyone in the building happy, at least 20 tenants if I
 could convince them.. doubt I could.

 Anyway, I have potential access to the roof, I'd have to ask.

 Are there any laws if I want to sell service ?

 If I want to provide service to lets just say 50 clients (not in the
 building but through wireless), are there devices that dont have to
 rely on LOS ?

 I'm just trying to understand if this all went along well, how many
 devices would I need to mount up on the roof to support 20-50 clients
 externally with the devices and which devices..

 I'm looking to sell the bandwidth for a relatively low price, undercut
 wimax and not strictly looking for profit but looking to be the point
 guy for other tech operations for these potential clients..

 Also, to the people who have good access to bandwidth or even not..
 how much are you looking at from all your cost to what you actually
 charge (not including administrative) but lets assume your bandwidth
 costs 

Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread finkle dinkle
Are you trying to say that I'm just dreaming?

I do appreciate everyone's input..

I bet a few people have had the same dream as I, then started it and
figured out it wasn't all too easy..

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Josh Luthman
j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
 I remember those days.  Glad that ended 3 years ago, myself.




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Dragonwave Horizon Quantum

2010-05-27 Thread lakeland
I have a large amount of Compacts in the air without issue.  They work great.

They are not upgradeable to Quantum or Duo.

If you will need the bandwidth then go directly to the Quantum. Be careful of 
your 1+1 idea.  Makes no sense if you are running one common IDU with one 
common ODU with 2 channels

Good luck

Bob
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-Original Message-
From: Paolo Di Francesco paolo.difrance...@teleinform.com
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 19:54:58 
To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Dragonwave Horizon Quantum

Hi all

I am curious to know if anybody tried this product. Any comment?

Another question: can I migrate from Horizon Compact to Quantum or
better to invest directly into the quantum?

Thank you in advance.

P.S. most of the links should be 1+1 or with some form of redundancy

-- 


Ing. Paolo Di Francesco

Teleinform s.r.l.
Sede Legale: Via Francesco Paolo Di Blasi 1, 90144 Palermo
Unita' Operativa: Via Regione Siciliana 49, 90046 Monreale (Palermo)
Tel: +39-091-6408576, +39-091-6404501
Fax: +39-091-6406200

http://www.wikitel.it
http://www.teleinform.com






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread Jerry Richardson


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of finkle dinkle
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 10:51 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

1/2) UVerse is coming soon, box has been outside for 6 months on,
neighbors can get it but not the building yet.  6mbit max dsl and 28/3
possible cable modem but it's usually unstable.
With wireless you are not going to comptete on speed. Service/local 
guy/support/symmetrical speed are going to be your selling points. Sell based 
on speed and you'll get hammered.

3) if I want to sell LOS, it's pretty flat if I recall, I dont know to
what degree I can shoot LOS though, it may be smaller than I remember.
LOS gets you into the 5GHz equipment. 
- Canopy 430 ~21Mbps aggregate is the most stable unlicenced platform available 
at this time

4) maybe 5 miles, would love 10.
No problem with the Canopy 430 - you'll see full speed at 5 mi and perhaps 2/3 
speed at 10

5) want to be able to scale.. 50 megs each way would be great, 100
megs would be better (doubt I will have a customer for 100/100 but who
knows)
Nothing like that in PMP. you can use something like Ubiquity or other 802.11 
to get higher speeds, however they are not as robust as Canopy, and it does not 
scale well due to lack of GPS based Tx/Rx timing

6) if I could profit off it, why wouldn't I cater to the people who do
want the symmetrical speeds, residential or business -- I have no
discrimination towards people who work from home, like uploading
pictures and working, I will obviously have to figure something out
about file sharing.
When I say residential I am not including SOHO. Symmetrical is not really a 
selling feature for residential - Comcast/ATT has done a superb job convincing 
residential users that the only thing that matters is download speed. IF you 
focus on business, you can be quite profitable with fewer customers. 
7) I already get little sleep anyway ;) no I sleep well and very
little amount of people nag me.  I guess I'd have to learn to deal
with it.
8/9)  It's sort of like a service where I'm able to offer them a lot
more than just wireless service.  I could pretty much upsell them on
everything else, referrals and stuff.  With the potential clients I
have lined up for inside the building, If i could get two 50/50
customers which I KNOW I could, I will do well.
In the building you can do the 50Mbps+ connections. Unfortunately not via 
wireless.


I never thought about using the existing phone lines in the building..
I wonder how ATT would react to that once they're ready to launch
UVerse inside.  I do like the ability to be able reach Maximum Speeds
of 100 Mbps Symmetrical at distances up to 1,000 feet (300 m)  as
said on some of those VDSL modems but it's all maximum theoretical
speeds anyway.

I know I could differentiate myself from these bigger companies
because of the possible level of Enterprise support I could offer,
for example.. Offering the bigger companies space in the cage at the
datacenter with service to allow them to set their servers offsite but
pretty much be considered LAN since I could just send it via the PTP
Fiber link.  Also, I could obviously link up to any provider in Los
Angeles via the meet me rooms.  I'd probably plug into Hurricane
Electric since they're unbelievably cheap but there are Premium
Bandwidth Mix's out there that aren't too expensive and I think I
could make a pretty good amount of money doing this.

BUSINESS SERVICE IS WHERE IT'S AT.

Richard, thinking about changing my name to Wilmington Wellington
3rd.. perhaps I could get money at me with that sort of a name.


On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Jerry Richardson
jrichard...@aircloud.com wrote:
 There are a few considerations to make before heading down this path.
 1. What are you selling against? DSL, Cable, 3G, Satellite
 2. What speeds are available via these services
 3. What is your terrain like - trees, hills, valley, desert, etc
 4. What is the max distance you are looking to cover - 1, 5, 10 miles?
 5. What speeds do you want to deliver - 1.5, 3.0, 10, 20 Mbps
 6. You said symmetrical speeds - why? Pretty uncommon for residential service
 7. Are you prepared to get little sleep, give up most of your free time for 
 at least the forst 2-3 months?
 8. If you are doing this to break even, don't bother. You are only doing your 
 customers a disservice because you will get tired/bored/sick of losing money 
 and shut it down.
 9. If you want to make this profitable, plan on trying to get some business 
 customers - they are worth muvh more.

 Jerry

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
 Behalf Of finkle dinkle
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 8:57 AM
 To: wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 So, I've got space in a building in So. Cal with a lot of neighbors
 with crappy connections. In the beginning, I wanted to bring in a gig
 PTP 

Re: [WISPA] How the FCC Proposes the Regulate Broadband

2010-05-27 Thread MDK
Thanks...I was not writing this as if it were a mature proposal... but 
rather as something to stimulate debate.I'm sure that other people see 
pitfalls in things I don't, and may perceive unintended consequences I have 
not.  I don't consider it be anywhere near best of all worlds, but it 
seems both sellable and viable, in our political and economic climate, and 
it's structure is one of a self-exterminating subsidy,  save a very few 
extremely remote places.

I had further thoughts about this...

1.   The area of coverage needs to be small.That is, coverage for an 
area definition should be no larger than a zip code.The point being 
that such granularity yields up the ability to actually COVER some place 
without being a multi-million dollar operation. That the areas in 
question should be defined as those having common economic ties, and 
separation by geography should result in area boundaries.   By its very 
nature,  this would initially encourage a lot of extisting competition to 
expand coverage, and then would achieve the goals we all see as worthy. 
And end any subsidy permanently.

2.That ISP's should be able to freely contract with each other to 
cover an area.Let's imagine some smallish town in Wyoming, where a 
WISP opens up shop.This hypothetical zip code boundary is served by a 
WISP, except for one area that's served by a remote DSLAM from another town. 
The original ISP located in this area doesn't cover that small isolated area 
because it's already served, and because geography makes it very difficult. 
In this case, the ISP in the area can contract with the isp that serves the 
small bit, reaching the 95% threshold...   The serving provider then applies 
for and gets the rebate for those he serves, and the contracted  ISP gets 
the same - but only for those in that region contracted by the local 
provider. Imagine two WISP's who share a zip code, where one serves the 
northern part, and one the southern part.One can become the original and 
contract with his competitor legally, to achieve a single provider 
coverage for a whole area, and whatever subsidy is paid directly to the 
serving provider, though each makes up only a part of a region and the two 
together really only equal a single whole.

What I've suggested is a stance by WISPA that can and will be criticized by 
at least some as being ideological.I consider it a practical stance, 
not ideological,  but that's just me.   Before WISPA and its members take 
any such stand, it should be consider A big deal, and debated by the 
membership as such.

If, for instance, WISPA did adopt such a stand My harsh criticism would 
end and I would financially support WISPA, as that was and remains my 
original belief in what a trade organization should be doing.Though 
we're a business, we're all citizens at the same time, and our collective 
stand should be conservative, sober, and one of national fiscal 
responsibility. That may make WISPA unique, but it seems like a stand 
that would be applauded and promoted widely by a lot of people with extreme 
concern for their country... and for general direction of our national 
character.



++
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
541-969-8200  509-386-4589
++

--
From: Brian Webster bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 5:25 AM
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] How the FCC Proposes the Regulate Broadband

 Mark,
 This is an interesting and well thought out proposal. Thank you for
 taking the time to post and for also not making it politically charged. It
 might be a good idea to create a condensed version of this proposal with
 simple bullet points. Politicians and other government officials have a
 short attention span so a  Readers Digest version of this same idea would
 help in gathering interest and support for the concept. If they express
 serious interest, a more detailed description can be presented to them.
 Having to read your full description will get lost on those who skim ideas
 in the interest of saving time. A condensed version would also be easier 
 to
 present to the proper WISPA committees to begin discussion. I know quite a
 few WISPA members do not read the general list in as much detail as they 
 do
 other lists. I'd be willing to present your concept to the proper 
 committees
 for consideration.



 Brian

 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] How the FCC Proposes the Regulate Broadband

2010-05-27 Thread Scott Reed
I agree with small.  I wonder if Census Block would work.  Where I am it 
will be a long time before it makes sense to cover 95% of a couple of 
zip codes.  1 to 2 houses per square mile in hills and trees.  But with 
census blocks I can hit 95% of a lot of them.  Also, since the Form 477 
moved to census blocks, the FCC can know who is reporting for the block 
to help determine eligibility.
One thing that would be interesting is how anyone will determine 95% 
coverage.  I am not arguing against it, just that it will be a hard to 
measure quantity.

MDK wrote:
 Thanks...I was not writing this as if it were a mature proposal... but 
 rather as something to stimulate debate.I'm sure that other people see 
 pitfalls in things I don't, and may perceive unintended consequences I have 
 not.  I don't consider it be anywhere near best of all worlds, but it 
 seems both sellable and viable, in our political and economic climate, and 
 it's structure is one of a self-exterminating subsidy,  save a very few 
 extremely remote places.

 I had further thoughts about this...

 1.   The area of coverage needs to be small.That is, coverage for an 
 area definition should be no larger than a zip code.The point being 
 that such granularity yields up the ability to actually COVER some place 
 without being a multi-million dollar operation. That the areas in 
 question should be defined as those having common economic ties, and 
 separation by geography should result in area boundaries.   By its very 
 nature,  this would initially encourage a lot of extisting competition to 
 expand coverage, and then would achieve the goals we all see as worthy. 
 And end any subsidy permanently.

 2.That ISP's should be able to freely contract with each other to 
 cover an area.Let's imagine some smallish town in Wyoming, where a 
 WISP opens up shop.This hypothetical zip code boundary is served by a 
 WISP, except for one area that's served by a remote DSLAM from another town. 
 The original ISP located in this area doesn't cover that small isolated area 
 because it's already served, and because geography makes it very difficult. 
 In this case, the ISP in the area can contract with the isp that serves the 
 small bit, reaching the 95% threshold...   The serving provider then applies 
 for and gets the rebate for those he serves, and the contracted  ISP gets 
 the same - but only for those in that region contracted by the local 
 provider. Imagine two WISP's who share a zip code, where one serves the 
 northern part, and one the southern part.One can become the original and 
 contract with his competitor legally, to achieve a single provider 
 coverage for a whole area, and whatever subsidy is paid directly to the 
 serving provider, though each makes up only a part of a region and the two 
 together really only equal a single whole.

 What I've suggested is a stance by WISPA that can and will be criticized by 
 at least some as being ideological.I consider it a practical stance, 
 not ideological,  but that's just me.   Before WISPA and its members take 
 any such stand, it should be consider A big deal, and debated by the 
 membership as such.

 If, for instance, WISPA did adopt such a stand My harsh criticism would 
 end and I would financially support WISPA, as that was and remains my 
 original belief in what a trade organization should be doing.Though 
 we're a business, we're all citizens at the same time, and our collective 
 stand should be conservative, sober, and one of national fiscal 
 responsibility. That may make WISPA unique, but it seems like a stand 
 that would be applauded and promoted widely by a lot of people with extreme 
 concern for their country... and for general direction of our national 
 character.



 ++
 Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
 541-969-8200  509-386-4589
 ++

 --
 From: Brian Webster bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 5:25 AM
 To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] How the FCC Proposes the Regulate Broadband

   
 Mark,
 This is an interesting and well thought out proposal. Thank you for
 taking the time to post and for also not making it politically charged. It
 might be a good idea to create a condensed version of this proposal with
 simple bullet points. Politicians and other government officials have a
 short attention span so a  Readers Digest version of this same idea would
 help in gathering interest and support for the concept. If they express
 serious interest, a more detailed description can be presented to them.
 Having to read your full description will get lost on those who skim ideas
 in the interest of saving time. A condensed version would also be easier 
 to
 present to the proper WISPA committees to begin discussion. I know quite a
 few WISPA members do not read 

Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread RickG
I kinda like finkle dinkle, it has a ring to it! Speaking of funny names:
http://blogote.com/2008/resources/worlds-longest-domain-names-website-on-internet.html
http://blogote.com/2008/technology/googles-funny-weird-surprising-domain-names.html


On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com wrote:
 My first recommendation would be to legally change your name from Finkle
 Dinkle to something that sounds a little more business-like. I'd
 recommend something like Joe Smith or Bob Jones.

 finkle dinkle wrote:
 So, I've got space in a building in So. Cal with a lot of neighbors
 with crappy connections. In the beginning, I wanted to bring in a gig
 PTP from the datacenter 12 miles away... I'm not a salesman, I think
 with the bandwidth I have available at the DC + the of the PTP, I
 could've made everyone in the building happy, at least 20 tenants if I
 could convince them.. doubt I could.

 Anyway, I have potential access to the roof, I'd have to ask.

 Are there any laws if I want to sell service ?

 If I want to provide service to lets just say 50 clients (not in the
 building but through wireless), are there devices that dont have to
 rely on LOS ?

 I'm just trying to understand if this all went along well, how many
 devices would I need to mount up on the roof to support 20-50 clients
 externally with the devices and which devices..

 I'm looking to sell the bandwidth for a relatively low price, undercut
 wimax and not strictly looking for profit but looking to be the point
 guy for other tech operations for these potential clients..

 Also, to the people who have good access to bandwidth or even not..
 how much are you looking at from all your cost to what you actually
 charge (not including administrative) but lets assume your bandwidth
 costs are 8k/month with the point to point to the datacenter +
 1000mbit commit. I know I could do better but what are we looking at
 here, if the total cost to get the bandwidth, less the equipment to my
 office building at 8 bux a meg, how much should I be selling it ? any
 recommendations ?

 I do not want to be a company like towerstream where I sell 8 megs for
 800/MRC, i'm looking to charge more like 25 bux per meg... Is my model
 right or wrong ?


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 --
 Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
 Network Design - Technical Training - Technical Writing
 Serving the Broadband Wireless, Networking and Telecom Communities since 1993
 www.ask-wi.com  818-227-4220  jun...@ask-wi.com






 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread RickG
OrYou Dont Know Jack.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You_Don't_Know_Jack_(game)
Whoops, back to the computer game Thread --

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com wrote:
 Ungerton sounds very nice; it's right up there with Ungerville which is
 way ahead of Ungerberg. Unfortunately, Ungerstanding is already taken.
 To avoid confusion, you might want to consider a different first name...
 maybe Biff or Roger.

 finkle dinkle wrote:

 Thanks for the suggestion about changing my name, I'll be sure to
 download the forms, submit them and change my name to Jack Ungerton.

 Well, I know the capabilities of a NanoBridge M5 now as I've tested it
 for a friend but it was done for two buildings around 500 feet in
 distance.

 Is something as basic as a NanoBridge M5 doable or if you start
 getting into the commercial sector, do you start requiring better
 equipment ?

 I haven't been on a roof in a long time so I dont clearly remember
 what is visible from the top but I'm sure it's a lot.

 I just want to be able to provide decent pricing to the people and
 businesses here with symmetrical bandwidth.  I haven't had time to
 figure out administrative costs and how I could provide support if
 there are any issues though.

 I would love to have something set up to provide service for a radius
 of a few miles but I'm not sure that's something I should be messing
 with.  I pretty much am curious on if I were to sell a few hundred
 megs, what type of devices and how many devices at what cost will it
 be ?

 Thanks

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Randy Cosby dco...@infowest.com wrote:


 Sheesh you guys, you're scaring him AND making fun of his name.  Welcome
 to the club :)


 --
 Randy Cosby
 Vice President
 InfoWest, Inc

 435-674-0165 x 2010

 http://www.infowest.com/

 As knowledge increases, the verdict of yesterday must be reversed
 today, and in the long run the most positive authority is the
 least to be trusted. - Hugh Nibley



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 --
 Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
 Network Design - Technical Training - Technical Writing
 Serving the Broadband Wireless, Networking and Telecom Communities since
 1993
 www.ask-wi.com  818-227-4220  jun...@ask-wi.com






 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread RickG
Good list Jerry! I'd also recommend a good business plan in writing.
Oh! 7. Are you prepared to get little sleep, give up most of your
free time for at least the forst 2-3 months?
You meant 2-3 years, correct? ;)

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Jerry Richardson
jrichard...@aircloud.com wrote:
 There are a few considerations to make before heading down this path.
 1. What are you selling against? DSL, Cable, 3G, Satellite
 2. What speeds are available via these services
 3. What is your terrain like - trees, hills, valley, desert, etc
 4. What is the max distance you are looking to cover - 1, 5, 10 miles?
 5. What speeds do you want to deliver - 1.5, 3.0, 10, 20 Mbps
 6. You said symmetrical speeds - why? Pretty uncommon for residential service
 7. Are you prepared to get little sleep, give up most of your free time for 
 at least the forst 2-3 months?
 8. If you are doing this to break even, don't bother. You are only doing your 
 customers a disservice because you will get tired/bored/sick of losing money 
 and shut it down.
 9. If you want to make this profitable, plan on trying to get some business 
 customers - they are worth muvh more.

 Jerry

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
 Behalf Of finkle dinkle
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 8:57 AM
 To: wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 So, I've got space in a building in So. Cal with a lot of neighbors
 with crappy connections. In the beginning, I wanted to bring in a gig
 PTP from the datacenter 12 miles away... I'm not a salesman, I think
 with the bandwidth I have available at the DC + the of the PTP, I
 could've made everyone in the building happy, at least 20 tenants if I
 could convince them.. doubt I could.

 Anyway, I have potential access to the roof, I'd have to ask.

 Are there any laws if I want to sell service ?

 If I want to provide service to lets just say 50 clients (not in the
 building but through wireless), are there devices that dont have to
 rely on LOS ?

 I'm just trying to understand if this all went along well, how many
 devices would I need to mount up on the roof to support 20-50 clients
 externally with the devices and which devices..

 I'm looking to sell the bandwidth for a relatively low price, undercut
 wimax and not strictly looking for profit but looking to be the point
 guy for other tech operations for these potential clients..

 Also, to the people who have good access to bandwidth or even not..
 how much are you looking at from all your cost to what you actually
 charge (not including administrative) but lets assume your bandwidth
 costs are 8k/month with the point to point to the datacenter +
 1000mbit commit. I know I could do better but what are we looking at
 here, if the total cost to get the bandwidth, less the equipment to my
 office building at 8 bux a meg, how much should I be selling it ? any
 recommendations ?

 I do not want to be a company like towerstream where I sell 8 megs for
 800/MRC, i'm looking to charge more like 25 bux per meg... Is my model
 right or wrong ?


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread RickG
Or BPL.

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Jeremie Chism jchi...@gmail.com wrote:
 I was thinking the same thing. Use a mini dslam on the free pairs to
 get Internet in the rooms. Ptp to the building and dsl to the customer.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On May 27, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just-
 micro.com wrote:

 Then you could provide the access via dsl in the building.  That
 would be
 the logical route to go I think.

 -Richard

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 On
 Behalf Of finkle dinkle
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 1:08 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Justin, appreciate your suggestion.  I've been looking around and will
 continue to.

 Josh, the gbit ptp will be done through fiber to the building, then
 whoever in the building wants service.. will pay set up to get set up
 with ethernet or fiber to my office.

 I know I could get enough business inside the building to cover half
 the cost of everything because I'm pretty sure there is a company here
 with quite a few T1's, overpaying and not getting what they deserve.
 I've always been a proponent of maxing stuff out so I will be a great
 benefit to the tenants.

 So if I'm able to set something up externally, I may be able to
 actually break even and profit some,  I actually know I could profit
 but I want this to be more of a service to the people who are unable
 to get anything decent out here.

 Thanks

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Justin Wilson li...@mtin.net wrote:
    Nice introduction to the WISPA community. Make fun of the name.
 I even
 recommended this person check out WISPA from the Ubiquity forums.
  Anyhow,
 welcome.  I would suggest reading through the archives for some good
 discussions on things.

    Justin
 --
 Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
 http://www.mtin.net/blog
 Wisp Consulting  Tower Climbing  Network Support



 From: Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com
 Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 09:28:35 -0700
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 My first recommendation would be to legally change your name from
 Finkle
 Dinkle to something that sounds a little more business-like. I'd
 recommend something like Joe Smith or Bob Jones.

 finkle dinkle wrote:
 So, I've got space in a building in So. Cal with a lot of neighbors
 with crappy connections. In the beginning, I wanted to bring in a
 gig
 PTP from the datacenter 12 miles away... I'm not a salesman, I think
 with the bandwidth I have available at the DC + the of the PTP, I
 could've made everyone in the building happy, at least 20 tenants
 if I
 could convince them.. doubt I could.

 Anyway, I have potential access to the roof, I'd have to ask.

 Are there any laws if I want to sell service ?

 If I want to provide service to lets just say 50 clients (not in the
 building but through wireless), are there devices that dont have to
 rely on LOS ?

 I'm just trying to understand if this all went along well, how many
 devices would I need to mount up on the roof to support 20-50
 clients
 externally with the devices and which devices..

 I'm looking to sell the bandwidth for a relatively low price,
 undercut
 wimax and not strictly looking for profit but looking to be the
 point
 guy for other tech operations for these potential clients..

 Also, to the people who have good access to bandwidth or even not..
 how much are you looking at from all your cost to what you actually
 charge (not including administrative) but lets assume your bandwidth
 costs are 8k/month with the point to point to the datacenter +
 1000mbit commit. I know I could do better but what are we looking at
 here, if the total cost to get the bandwidth, less the equipment
 to my
 office building at 8 bux a meg, how much should I be selling it ?
 any
 recommendations ?

 I do not want to be a company like towerstream where I sell 8 megs
 for
 800/MRC, i'm looking to charge more like 25 bux per meg... Is my
 model
 right or wrong ?




 ---
 ---
 --
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


 ---
 ---
 --
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 --
 Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
 Network Design - Technical Training - Technical Writing
 Serving the Broadband Wireless, Networking and Telecom Communities
 since
 1993
 www.ask-wi.com  818-227-4220  jun...@ask-wi.com







 ---
 ---
 --
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 ---
 ---
 --
 

 WISPA Wireless List: 

Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread Jerry Richardson
Thought BPL was dead

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of RickG
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:28 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

Or BPL.

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Jeremie Chism jchi...@gmail.com wrote:
 I was thinking the same thing. Use a mini dslam on the free pairs to
 get Internet in the rooms. Ptp to the building and dsl to the customer.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On May 27, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just-
 micro.com wrote:

 Then you could provide the access via dsl in the building.  That
 would be
 the logical route to go I think.

 -Richard

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 On
 Behalf Of finkle dinkle
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 1:08 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Justin, appreciate your suggestion.  I've been looking around and will
 continue to.

 Josh, the gbit ptp will be done through fiber to the building, then
 whoever in the building wants service.. will pay set up to get set up
 with ethernet or fiber to my office.

 I know I could get enough business inside the building to cover half
 the cost of everything because I'm pretty sure there is a company here
 with quite a few T1's, overpaying and not getting what they deserve.
 I've always been a proponent of maxing stuff out so I will be a great
 benefit to the tenants.

 So if I'm able to set something up externally, I may be able to
 actually break even and profit some,  I actually know I could profit
 but I want this to be more of a service to the people who are unable
 to get anything decent out here.

 Thanks

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Justin Wilson li...@mtin.net wrote:
    Nice introduction to the WISPA community. Make fun of the name.
 I even
 recommended this person check out WISPA from the Ubiquity forums.
  Anyhow,
 welcome.  I would suggest reading through the archives for some good
 discussions on things.

    Justin
 --
 Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
 http://www.mtin.net/blog
 Wisp Consulting  Tower Climbing  Network Support



 From: Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com
 Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 09:28:35 -0700
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 My first recommendation would be to legally change your name from
 Finkle
 Dinkle to something that sounds a little more business-like. I'd
 recommend something like Joe Smith or Bob Jones.

 finkle dinkle wrote:
 So, I've got space in a building in So. Cal with a lot of neighbors
 with crappy connections. In the beginning, I wanted to bring in a
 gig
 PTP from the datacenter 12 miles away... I'm not a salesman, I think
 with the bandwidth I have available at the DC + the of the PTP, I
 could've made everyone in the building happy, at least 20 tenants
 if I
 could convince them.. doubt I could.

 Anyway, I have potential access to the roof, I'd have to ask.

 Are there any laws if I want to sell service ?

 If I want to provide service to lets just say 50 clients (not in the
 building but through wireless), are there devices that dont have to
 rely on LOS ?

 I'm just trying to understand if this all went along well, how many
 devices would I need to mount up on the roof to support 20-50
 clients
 externally with the devices and which devices..

 I'm looking to sell the bandwidth for a relatively low price,
 undercut
 wimax and not strictly looking for profit but looking to be the
 point
 guy for other tech operations for these potential clients..

 Also, to the people who have good access to bandwidth or even not..
 how much are you looking at from all your cost to what you actually
 charge (not including administrative) but lets assume your bandwidth
 costs are 8k/month with the point to point to the datacenter +
 1000mbit commit. I know I could do better but what are we looking at
 here, if the total cost to get the bandwidth, less the equipment
 to my
 office building at 8 bux a meg, how much should I be selling it ?
 any
 recommendations ?

 I do not want to be a company like towerstream where I sell 8 megs
 for
 800/MRC, i'm looking to charge more like 25 bux per meg... Is my
 model
 right or wrong ?




 ---
 ---
 --
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


 ---
 ---
 --
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 --
 Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
 Network Design - Technical Training - Technical Writing
 Serving the Broadband Wireless, Networking and Telecom Communities
 since
 1993
 www.ask-wi.com  818-227-4220  jun...@ask-wi.com







 ---
 ---
 

Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread finkle dinkle
Yea, I will want to specialize only in businesses truthfully, when I
say that I will support residential, they're going to pay business
rates and I will hand pick the people if they call me..  I dont want
headaches

Unfortunately I do not knowingly buy Motorola brand products for
personal reasons.

I do want to stick to ubnt brand products but I dont know exactly how
many NanoBridge M5's I could connect to a single one, so I dont want
to have to end up with the entire roof covered with antenna's.

The 50mbit I could offer internally with ethernet or vdsl would be
great if it was symmetrical (vdsl), I want to be able to do this, just
trying to figure out how much I'd sell 50/50.

Thanks

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Jerry Richardson
jrichard...@aircloud.com wrote:
 Thought BPL was dead

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
 Behalf Of RickG
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:28 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Or BPL.

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Jeremie Chism jchi...@gmail.com wrote:
 I was thinking the same thing. Use a mini dslam on the free pairs to
 get Internet in the rooms. Ptp to the building and dsl to the customer.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On May 27, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just-
 micro.com wrote:

 Then you could provide the access via dsl in the building.  That
 would be
 the logical route to go I think.

 -Richard

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 On
 Behalf Of finkle dinkle
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 1:08 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Justin, appreciate your suggestion.  I've been looking around and will
 continue to.

 Josh, the gbit ptp will be done through fiber to the building, then
 whoever in the building wants service.. will pay set up to get set up
 with ethernet or fiber to my office.

 I know I could get enough business inside the building to cover half
 the cost of everything because I'm pretty sure there is a company here
 with quite a few T1's, overpaying and not getting what they deserve.
 I've always been a proponent of maxing stuff out so I will be a great
 benefit to the tenants.

 So if I'm able to set something up externally, I may be able to
 actually break even and profit some,  I actually know I could profit
 but I want this to be more of a service to the people who are unable
 to get anything decent out here.

 Thanks

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Justin Wilson li...@mtin.net wrote:
    Nice introduction to the WISPA community. Make fun of the name.
 I even
 recommended this person check out WISPA from the Ubiquity forums.
  Anyhow,
 welcome.  I would suggest reading through the archives for some good
 discussions on things.

    Justin
 --
 Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
 http://www.mtin.net/blog
 Wisp Consulting  Tower Climbing  Network Support



 From: Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com
 Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 09:28:35 -0700
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 My first recommendation would be to legally change your name from
 Finkle
 Dinkle to something that sounds a little more business-like. I'd
 recommend something like Joe Smith or Bob Jones.

 finkle dinkle wrote:
 So, I've got space in a building in So. Cal with a lot of neighbors
 with crappy connections. In the beginning, I wanted to bring in a
 gig
 PTP from the datacenter 12 miles away... I'm not a salesman, I think
 with the bandwidth I have available at the DC + the of the PTP, I
 could've made everyone in the building happy, at least 20 tenants
 if I
 could convince them.. doubt I could.

 Anyway, I have potential access to the roof, I'd have to ask.

 Are there any laws if I want to sell service ?

 If I want to provide service to lets just say 50 clients (not in the
 building but through wireless), are there devices that dont have to
 rely on LOS ?

 I'm just trying to understand if this all went along well, how many
 devices would I need to mount up on the roof to support 20-50
 clients
 externally with the devices and which devices..

 I'm looking to sell the bandwidth for a relatively low price,
 undercut
 wimax and not strictly looking for profit but looking to be the
 point
 guy for other tech operations for these potential clients..

 Also, to the people who have good access to bandwidth or even not..
 how much are you looking at from all your cost to what you actually
 charge (not including administrative) but lets assume your bandwidth
 costs are 8k/month with the point to point to the datacenter +
 1000mbit commit. I know I could do better but what are we looking at
 here, if the total cost to get the bandwidth, less the equipment
 to my
 office building at 8 bux a meg, how much should I be selling it ?
 any
 recommendations ?

 I do not want to be a company like towerstream 

Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread Josh Luthman
Ubiquiti will not do 50+ stations.  Period.

You might get 25 on low bandwidth rates (2x512).

On 5/27/10, finkle dinkle char...@gmail.com wrote:
 Yea, I will want to specialize only in businesses truthfully, when I
 say that I will support residential, they're going to pay business
 rates and I will hand pick the people if they call me..  I dont want
 headaches

 Unfortunately I do not knowingly buy Motorola brand products for
 personal reasons.

 I do want to stick to ubnt brand products but I dont know exactly how
 many NanoBridge M5's I could connect to a single one, so I dont want
 to have to end up with the entire roof covered with antenna's.

 The 50mbit I could offer internally with ethernet or vdsl would be
 great if it was symmetrical (vdsl), I want to be able to do this, just
 trying to figure out how much I'd sell 50/50.

 Thanks

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Jerry Richardson
 jrichard...@aircloud.com wrote:
 Thought BPL was dead

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of RickG
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:28 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Or BPL.

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Jeremie Chism jchi...@gmail.com wrote:
 I was thinking the same thing. Use a mini dslam on the free pairs to
 get Internet in the rooms. Ptp to the building and dsl to the customer.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On May 27, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just-
 micro.com wrote:

 Then you could provide the access via dsl in the building.  That
 would be
 the logical route to go I think.

 -Richard

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 On
 Behalf Of finkle dinkle
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 1:08 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Justin, appreciate your suggestion.  I've been looking around and will
 continue to.

 Josh, the gbit ptp will be done through fiber to the building, then
 whoever in the building wants service.. will pay set up to get set up
 with ethernet or fiber to my office.

 I know I could get enough business inside the building to cover half
 the cost of everything because I'm pretty sure there is a company here
 with quite a few T1's, overpaying and not getting what they deserve.
 I've always been a proponent of maxing stuff out so I will be a great
 benefit to the tenants.

 So if I'm able to set something up externally, I may be able to
 actually break even and profit some,  I actually know I could profit
 but I want this to be more of a service to the people who are unable
 to get anything decent out here.

 Thanks

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Justin Wilson li...@mtin.net wrote:
    Nice introduction to the WISPA community. Make fun of the name.
 I even
 recommended this person check out WISPA from the Ubiquity forums.
  Anyhow,
 welcome.  I would suggest reading through the archives for some good
 discussions on things.

    Justin
 --
 Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
 http://www.mtin.net/blog
 Wisp Consulting  Tower Climbing  Network Support



 From: Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com
 Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 09:28:35 -0700
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 My first recommendation would be to legally change your name from
 Finkle
 Dinkle to something that sounds a little more business-like. I'd
 recommend something like Joe Smith or Bob Jones.

 finkle dinkle wrote:
 So, I've got space in a building in So. Cal with a lot of neighbors
 with crappy connections. In the beginning, I wanted to bring in a
 gig
 PTP from the datacenter 12 miles away... I'm not a salesman, I think
 with the bandwidth I have available at the DC + the of the PTP, I
 could've made everyone in the building happy, at least 20 tenants
 if I
 could convince them.. doubt I could.

 Anyway, I have potential access to the roof, I'd have to ask.

 Are there any laws if I want to sell service ?

 If I want to provide service to lets just say 50 clients (not in the
 building but through wireless), are there devices that dont have to
 rely on LOS ?

 I'm just trying to understand if this all went along well, how many
 devices would I need to mount up on the roof to support 20-50
 clients
 externally with the devices and which devices..

 I'm looking to sell the bandwidth for a relatively low price,
 undercut
 wimax and not strictly looking for profit but looking to be the
 point
 guy for other tech operations for these potential clients..

 Also, to the people who have good access to bandwidth or even not..
 how much are you looking at from all your cost to what you actually
 charge (not including administrative) but lets assume your bandwidth
 costs are 8k/month with the point to point to the datacenter +
 1000mbit commit. I know I could do better but what are we looking at
 here, if the total cost to get the bandwidth, less the 

Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread RickG
It still exists but not the degree other methods of access do. While
high  medium voltage use is still an option in some places, I was
actually referring to the in-building aspect of the network. There is
some cool equipment for that use:
http://www.corinex.com/in-building-solution-2.html
http://motorola.wirelessbroadbandsupport.com/solutions/bpl/
-RickG

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Jerry Richardson
jrichard...@aircloud.com wrote:
 Thought BPL was dead

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
 Behalf Of RickG
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:28 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Or BPL.

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Jeremie Chism jchi...@gmail.com wrote:
 I was thinking the same thing. Use a mini dslam on the free pairs to
 get Internet in the rooms. Ptp to the building and dsl to the customer.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On May 27, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just-
 micro.com wrote:

 Then you could provide the access via dsl in the building.  That
 would be
 the logical route to go I think.

 -Richard

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 On
 Behalf Of finkle dinkle
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 1:08 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Justin, appreciate your suggestion.  I've been looking around and will
 continue to.

 Josh, the gbit ptp will be done through fiber to the building, then
 whoever in the building wants service.. will pay set up to get set up
 with ethernet or fiber to my office.

 I know I could get enough business inside the building to cover half
 the cost of everything because I'm pretty sure there is a company here
 with quite a few T1's, overpaying and not getting what they deserve.
 I've always been a proponent of maxing stuff out so I will be a great
 benefit to the tenants.

 So if I'm able to set something up externally, I may be able to
 actually break even and profit some,  I actually know I could profit
 but I want this to be more of a service to the people who are unable
 to get anything decent out here.

 Thanks

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Justin Wilson li...@mtin.net wrote:
    Nice introduction to the WISPA community. Make fun of the name.
 I even
 recommended this person check out WISPA from the Ubiquity forums.
  Anyhow,
 welcome.  I would suggest reading through the archives for some good
 discussions on things.

    Justin
 --
 Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
 http://www.mtin.net/blog
 Wisp Consulting  Tower Climbing  Network Support



 From: Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com
 Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 09:28:35 -0700
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 My first recommendation would be to legally change your name from
 Finkle
 Dinkle to something that sounds a little more business-like. I'd
 recommend something like Joe Smith or Bob Jones.

 finkle dinkle wrote:
 So, I've got space in a building in So. Cal with a lot of neighbors
 with crappy connections. In the beginning, I wanted to bring in a
 gig
 PTP from the datacenter 12 miles away... I'm not a salesman, I think
 with the bandwidth I have available at the DC + the of the PTP, I
 could've made everyone in the building happy, at least 20 tenants
 if I
 could convince them.. doubt I could.

 Anyway, I have potential access to the roof, I'd have to ask.

 Are there any laws if I want to sell service ?

 If I want to provide service to lets just say 50 clients (not in the
 building but through wireless), are there devices that dont have to
 rely on LOS ?

 I'm just trying to understand if this all went along well, how many
 devices would I need to mount up on the roof to support 20-50
 clients
 externally with the devices and which devices..

 I'm looking to sell the bandwidth for a relatively low price,
 undercut
 wimax and not strictly looking for profit but looking to be the
 point
 guy for other tech operations for these potential clients..

 Also, to the people who have good access to bandwidth or even not..
 how much are you looking at from all your cost to what you actually
 charge (not including administrative) but lets assume your bandwidth
 costs are 8k/month with the point to point to the datacenter +
 1000mbit commit. I know I could do better but what are we looking at
 here, if the total cost to get the bandwidth, less the equipment
 to my
 office building at 8 bux a meg, how much should I be selling it ?
 any
 recommendations ?

 I do not want to be a company like towerstream where I sell 8 megs
 for
 800/MRC, i'm looking to charge more like 25 bux per meg... Is my
 model
 right or wrong ?




 ---
 ---
 --
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/


 ---
 ---
 

Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread RickG
Is that what you told Rickeesha? :)

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com wrote:
 That's why I had to change my name from Richard Head.  That last name was a
 curse on this list. Now I have a last name that gets me more respect.

 -Richard Face




 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Justin Wilson
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 12:58 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

    Nice introduction to the WISPA community. Make fun of the name. I even
 recommended this person check out WISPA from the Ubiquity forums.    Anyhow,
 welcome.  I would suggest reading through the archives for some good
 discussions on things.

    Justin
 --
 Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
 http://www.mtin.net/blog
 Wisp Consulting - Tower Climbing - Network Support



 From: Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com
 Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 09:28:35 -0700
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 My first recommendation would be to legally change your name from Finkle
 Dinkle to something that sounds a little more business-like. I'd
 recommend something like Joe Smith or Bob Jones.

 finkle dinkle wrote:
 So, I've got space in a building in So. Cal with a lot of neighbors
 with crappy connections. In the beginning, I wanted to bring in a gig
 PTP from the datacenter 12 miles away... I'm not a salesman, I think
 with the bandwidth I have available at the DC + the of the PTP, I
 could've made everyone in the building happy, at least 20 tenants if I
 could convince them.. doubt I could.

 Anyway, I have potential access to the roof, I'd have to ask.

 Are there any laws if I want to sell service ?

 If I want to provide service to lets just say 50 clients (not in the
 building but through wireless), are there devices that dont have to
 rely on LOS ?

 I'm just trying to understand if this all went along well, how many
 devices would I need to mount up on the roof to support 20-50 clients
 externally with the devices and which devices..

 I'm looking to sell the bandwidth for a relatively low price, undercut
 wimax and not strictly looking for profit but looking to be the point
 guy for other tech operations for these potential clients..

 Also, to the people who have good access to bandwidth or even not..
 how much are you looking at from all your cost to what you actually
 charge (not including administrative) but lets assume your bandwidth
 costs are 8k/month with the point to point to the datacenter +
 1000mbit commit. I know I could do better but what are we looking at
 here, if the total cost to get the bandwidth, less the equipment to my
 office building at 8 bux a meg, how much should I be selling it ? any
 recommendations ?

 I do not want to be a company like towerstream where I sell 8 megs for
 800/MRC, i'm looking to charge more like 25 bux per meg... Is my model
 right or wrong ?



 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/

 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




 --
 Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
 Network Design - Technical Training - Technical Writing
 Serving the Broadband Wireless, Networking and Telecom Communities since
 1993
 www.ask-wi.com  818-227-4220  jun...@ask-wi.com






 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

[WISPA] Trango 900AP

2010-05-27 Thread Patrick D. Nix, Jr
Anyone near Oklahoma have a Trango M900AP they are willing to let go of?

 

Patrick Nix, Jr.,
Computer Network Solutions
CSWEB.NET Internet Services
IT Manager

http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
http://www.csweb.net

(918) 235-0414

 



Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and
destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a
person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be
illegal.

 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Trango 900AP

2010-05-27 Thread Josh Luthman
I would sell one if you need it.

On 5/27/10, Patrick D. Nix, Jr pni...@cnetworksolutions.com wrote:
 Anyone near Oklahoma have a Trango M900AP they are willing to let go of?



 Patrick Nix, Jr.,
 Computer Network Solutions
 CSWEB.NET Internet Services
 IT Manager

 http://www.cnetworksolutions.com
 http://www.csweb.net

 (918) 235-0414



 

 Attention: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and
 privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
 notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this e-mail and
 destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a
 person other than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be
 illegal.





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



-- 
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue that counts.”
--- Winston Churchill



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread Jerry Richardson
Your Moto bias will cost you.

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of finkle dinkle
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:44 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

Yea, I will want to specialize only in businesses truthfully, when I
say that I will support residential, they're going to pay business
rates and I will hand pick the people if they call me..  I dont want
headaches

Unfortunately I do not knowingly buy Motorola brand products for
personal reasons.

I do want to stick to ubnt brand products but I dont know exactly how
many NanoBridge M5's I could connect to a single one, so I dont want
to have to end up with the entire roof covered with antenna's.

The 50mbit I could offer internally with ethernet or vdsl would be
great if it was symmetrical (vdsl), I want to be able to do this, just
trying to figure out how much I'd sell 50/50.

Thanks

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Jerry Richardson
jrichard...@aircloud.com wrote:
 Thought BPL was dead

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
 Behalf Of RickG
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:28 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Or BPL.

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Jeremie Chism jchi...@gmail.com wrote:
 I was thinking the same thing. Use a mini dslam on the free pairs to
 get Internet in the rooms. Ptp to the building and dsl to the customer.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On May 27, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just-
 micro.com wrote:

 Then you could provide the access via dsl in the building.  That
 would be
 the logical route to go I think.

 -Richard

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 On
 Behalf Of finkle dinkle
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 1:08 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Justin, appreciate your suggestion.  I've been looking around and will
 continue to.

 Josh, the gbit ptp will be done through fiber to the building, then
 whoever in the building wants service.. will pay set up to get set up
 with ethernet or fiber to my office.

 I know I could get enough business inside the building to cover half
 the cost of everything because I'm pretty sure there is a company here
 with quite a few T1's, overpaying and not getting what they deserve.
 I've always been a proponent of maxing stuff out so I will be a great
 benefit to the tenants.

 So if I'm able to set something up externally, I may be able to
 actually break even and profit some,  I actually know I could profit
 but I want this to be more of a service to the people who are unable
 to get anything decent out here.

 Thanks

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Justin Wilson li...@mtin.net wrote:
    Nice introduction to the WISPA community. Make fun of the name.
 I even
 recommended this person check out WISPA from the Ubiquity forums.
  Anyhow,
 welcome.  I would suggest reading through the archives for some good
 discussions on things.

    Justin
 --
 Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
 http://www.mtin.net/blog
 Wisp Consulting  Tower Climbing  Network Support



 From: Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com
 Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 09:28:35 -0700
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 My first recommendation would be to legally change your name from
 Finkle
 Dinkle to something that sounds a little more business-like. I'd
 recommend something like Joe Smith or Bob Jones.

 finkle dinkle wrote:
 So, I've got space in a building in So. Cal with a lot of neighbors
 with crappy connections. In the beginning, I wanted to bring in a
 gig
 PTP from the datacenter 12 miles away... I'm not a salesman, I think
 with the bandwidth I have available at the DC + the of the PTP, I
 could've made everyone in the building happy, at least 20 tenants
 if I
 could convince them.. doubt I could.

 Anyway, I have potential access to the roof, I'd have to ask.

 Are there any laws if I want to sell service ?

 If I want to provide service to lets just say 50 clients (not in the
 building but through wireless), are there devices that dont have to
 rely on LOS ?

 I'm just trying to understand if this all went along well, how many
 devices would I need to mount up on the roof to support 20-50
 clients
 externally with the devices and which devices..

 I'm looking to sell the bandwidth for a relatively low price,
 undercut
 wimax and not strictly looking for profit but looking to be the
 point
 guy for other tech operations for these potential clients..

 Also, to the people who have good access to bandwidth or even not..
 how much are you looking at from all your cost to what you actually
 charge (not including administrative) but lets assume your bandwidth
 costs are 8k/month with the point to point to the datacenter +
 1000mbit commit. I know I could 

[WISPA] 900MHz Backhaul Solutions

2010-05-27 Thread Pat O'Connor
I just want to see what everyone else is using and what their 
experiences are.

Thanks,

Pat




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 900MHz Backhaul Solutions

2010-05-27 Thread Jeremie Chism
Waverider has one but I have not personally used it. I have a couple  
of their 5.8 units running for over 2 years. No problems.

900 didn't have enough bandwidthfor me.

Sent from my iPhone

On May 27, 2010, at 5:54 PM, Pat O'Connor p...@inlandnet.com wrote:

 I just want to see what everyone else is using and what their
 experiences are.

 Thanks,

 Pat



 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 --- 
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik routing/queing problem

2010-05-27 Thread Kevin Sullivan
Can you lock down gig? Most of the time I've tried to do that it seemed 
problematic.

Kevin
- Original Message - 
From: Leon D. Zetekoff wa4...@arrl.net
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 7:09 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik routing/queing problem


 On 5/27/2010 10:04 AM, RickG wrote:
 Auto neg can cause problems.

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:51 AM, Kevin Sullivan
 kevin.sulli...@alyrica.net  wrote:

 No, it's a gig link, set to auto neg.

 snip

 auto-neg definitely the problem especially if non gig on other side.
 Lock both sides down

 Leon






No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2897 - Release Date: 05/26/10 
02:25:00








 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik routing/queing problem

2010-05-27 Thread Josh Luthman
What NICs are your Linux routers?

On 5/27/10, Kevin Sullivan kevin.sulli...@alyrica.net wrote:
 Can you lock down gig? Most of the time I've tried to do that it seemed
 problematic.

 Kevin
 - Original Message -
 From: Leon D. Zetekoff wa4...@arrl.net
 To: wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 7:09 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik routing/queing problem


 On 5/27/2010 10:04 AM, RickG wrote:
 Auto neg can cause problems.

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:51 AM, Kevin Sullivan
 kevin.sulli...@alyrica.net  wrote:

 No, it's a gig link, set to auto neg.

 snip

 auto-neg definitely the problem especially if non gig on other side.
 Lock both sides down

 Leon


 



 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2897 - Release Date: 05/26/10
 02:25:00



 




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



-- 
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue that counts.”
--- Winston Churchill



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik routing/queing problem

2010-05-27 Thread Kevin Sullivan
Broadcom, not sure which.  I'll check.

Kevin
- Original Message - 
From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik routing/queing problem


What NICs are your Linux routers?

On 5/27/10, Kevin Sullivan kevin.sulli...@alyrica.net wrote:
 Can you lock down gig? Most of the time I've tried to do that it seemed
 problematic.

 Kevin
 - Original Message -
 From: Leon D. Zetekoff wa4...@arrl.net
 To: wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 7:09 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik routing/queing problem


 On 5/27/2010 10:04 AM, RickG wrote:
 Auto neg can cause problems.

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:51 AM, Kevin Sullivan
 kevin.sulli...@alyrica.net  wrote:

 No, it's a gig link, set to auto neg.

 snip

 auto-neg definitely the problem especially if non gig on other side.
 Lock both sides down

 Leon


 



 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2897 - Release Date: 05/26/10
 02:25:00



 




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



-- 
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue that counts.”
--- Winston Churchill



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik routing/queing problem

2010-05-27 Thread Josh Luthman
I would definitely replace those.  IME Broadcom is the worst *nix NIC.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
continue that counts.”
--- Winston Churchill



On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Kevin Sullivan
kevin.sulli...@alyrica.net wrote:
 Broadcom, not sure which.  I'll check.

 Kevin
 - Original Message -
 From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 4:30 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik routing/queing problem


 What NICs are your Linux routers?

 On 5/27/10, Kevin Sullivan kevin.sulli...@alyrica.net wrote:
 Can you lock down gig? Most of the time I've tried to do that it seemed
 problematic.

 Kevin
 - Original Message -
 From: Leon D. Zetekoff wa4...@arrl.net
 To: wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 7:09 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik routing/queing problem


 On 5/27/2010 10:04 AM, RickG wrote:
 Auto neg can cause problems.

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:51 AM, Kevin Sullivan
 kevin.sulli...@alyrica.net  wrote:

 No, it's a gig link, set to auto neg.

 snip

 auto-neg definitely the problem especially if non gig on other side.
 Lock both sides down

 Leon


 



 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2897 - Release Date: 05/26/10
 02:25:00



 




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 --
 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
 continue that counts.”
 --- Winston Churchill


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread Chuck Hogg
I was thinking the same thing... I want to be business class and go the cheap-o 
route.  By a Yugo, get Yugo quality...especially if you think 50 business 
customers on a single ap is going to work well in an urban area with UBNT.

Regards,
Chuck Hogg
Shelby Broadband
502-722-9292
ch...@shelbybb.com
http://www.shelbybb.com


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Jerry Richardson
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 6:12 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

Your Moto bias will cost you.

-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of finkle dinkle
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:44 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

Yea, I will want to specialize only in businesses truthfully, when I say that I 
will support residential, they're going to pay business rates and I will hand 
pick the people if they call me..  I dont want headaches

Unfortunately I do not knowingly buy Motorola brand products for personal 
reasons.

I do want to stick to ubnt brand products but I dont know exactly how many 
NanoBridge M5's I could connect to a single one, so I dont want to have to end 
up with the entire roof covered with antenna's.

The 50mbit I could offer internally with ethernet or vdsl would be great if it 
was symmetrical (vdsl), I want to be able to do this, just trying to figure out 
how much I'd sell 50/50.

Thanks

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Jerry Richardson jrichard...@aircloud.com 
wrote:
 Thought BPL was dead

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] 
 On Behalf Of RickG
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:28 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Or BPL.

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Jeremie Chism jchi...@gmail.com wrote:
 I was thinking the same thing. Use a mini dslam on the free pairs to 
 get Internet in the rooms. Ptp to the building and dsl to the customer.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On May 27, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just- 
 micro.com wrote:

 Then you could provide the access via dsl in the building.  That 
 would be the logical route to go I think.

 -Richard

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 On
 Behalf Of finkle dinkle
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 1:08 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Justin, appreciate your suggestion.  I've been looking around and 
 will continue to.

 Josh, the gbit ptp will be done through fiber to the building, then 
 whoever in the building wants service.. will pay set up to get set 
 up with ethernet or fiber to my office.

 I know I could get enough business inside the building to cover half 
 the cost of everything because I'm pretty sure there is a company 
 here with quite a few T1's, overpaying and not getting what they deserve.
 I've always been a proponent of maxing stuff out so I will be a 
 great benefit to the tenants.

 So if I'm able to set something up externally, I may be able to 
 actually break even and profit some,  I actually know I could profit 
 but I want this to be more of a service to the people who are unable 
 to get anything decent out here.

 Thanks

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Justin Wilson li...@mtin.net wrote:
    Nice introduction to the WISPA community. Make fun of the name.
 I even
 recommended this person check out WISPA from the Ubiquity forums.
  Anyhow,
 welcome.  I would suggest reading through the archives for some 
 good discussions on things.

    Justin
 --
 Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
 http://www.mtin.net/blog
 Wisp Consulting  Tower Climbing  Network Support



 From: Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com
 Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 09:28:35 -0700
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 My first recommendation would be to legally change your name from 
 Finkle Dinkle to something that sounds a little more business-like. 
 I'd recommend something like Joe Smith or Bob Jones.

 finkle dinkle wrote:
 So, I've got space in a building in So. Cal with a lot of 
 neighbors with crappy connections. In the beginning, I wanted to 
 bring in a gig PTP from the datacenter 12 miles away... I'm not a 
 salesman, I think with the bandwidth I have available at the DC + 
 the of the PTP, I could've made everyone in the building happy, at 
 least 20 tenants if I could convince them.. doubt I could.

 Anyway, I have potential access to the roof, I'd have to ask.

 Are there any laws if I want to sell service ?

 If I want to provide service to lets just say 50 clients (not in 
 the building but through wireless), are there devices that dont 
 have to rely on LOS ?

 I'm just trying to understand if this all went along well, how 
 many devices would I need to mount up on the roof to 

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik routing/queing problem

2010-05-27 Thread Glenn Kelley
AMEN to THAT

use Intel wherever possible


On May 27, 2010, at 7:00 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:

 I would definitely replace those.  IME Broadcom is the worst *nix NIC.

 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
 continue that counts.”
 --- Winston Churchill



 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Kevin Sullivan
 kevin.sulli...@alyrica.net wrote:
 Broadcom, not sure which.  I'll check.

 Kevin
 - Original Message -
 From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 4:30 PM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik routing/queing problem


 What NICs are your Linux routers?

 On 5/27/10, Kevin Sullivan kevin.sulli...@alyrica.net wrote:
 Can you lock down gig? Most of the time I've tried to do that it  
 seemed
 problematic.

 Kevin
 - Original Message -
 From: Leon D. Zetekoff wa4...@arrl.net
 To: wireless@wispa.org
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 7:09 AM
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik routing/queing problem


 On 5/27/2010 10:04 AM, RickG wrote:
 Auto neg can cause problems.

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:51 AM, Kevin Sullivan
 kevin.sulli...@alyrica.net  wrote:

 No, it's a gig link, set to auto neg.

 snip

 auto-neg definitely the problem especially if non gig on other  
 side.
 Lock both sides down

 Leon


 



 No virus found in this outgoing message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2897 - Release Date:  
 05/26/10
 02:25:00



 




 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 --
 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340
 Direct: 937-552-2343
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to
 continue that counts.”
 --- Winston Churchill


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread finkle dinkle
Well, I'm not saying I want a single AP, just trying to determine
which route with UBNT products would support the most per client

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com wrote:
 I was thinking the same thing... I want to be business class and go the 
 cheap-o route.  By a Yugo, get Yugo quality...especially if you think 50 
 business customers on a single ap is going to work well in an urban area with 
 UBNT.

 Regards,
 Chuck Hogg
 Shelby Broadband
 502-722-9292
 ch...@shelbybb.com
 http://www.shelbybb.com


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
 Behalf Of Jerry Richardson
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 6:12 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Your Moto bias will cost you.

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
 Behalf Of finkle dinkle
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:44 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Yea, I will want to specialize only in businesses truthfully, when I say that 
 I will support residential, they're going to pay business rates and I will 
 hand pick the people if they call me..  I dont want headaches

 Unfortunately I do not knowingly buy Motorola brand products for personal 
 reasons.

 I do want to stick to ubnt brand products but I dont know exactly how many 
 NanoBridge M5's I could connect to a single one, so I dont want to have to 
 end up with the entire roof covered with antenna's.

 The 50mbit I could offer internally with ethernet or vdsl would be great if 
 it was symmetrical (vdsl), I want to be able to do this, just trying to 
 figure out how much I'd sell 50/50.

 Thanks

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Jerry Richardson jrichard...@aircloud.com 
 wrote:
 Thought BPL was dead

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 On Behalf Of RickG
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:28 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Or BPL.

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Jeremie Chism jchi...@gmail.com wrote:
 I was thinking the same thing. Use a mini dslam on the free pairs to
 get Internet in the rooms. Ptp to the building and dsl to the customer.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On May 27, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just-
 micro.com wrote:

 Then you could provide the access via dsl in the building.  That
 would be the logical route to go I think.

 -Richard

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 On
 Behalf Of finkle dinkle
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 1:08 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Justin, appreciate your suggestion.  I've been looking around and
 will continue to.

 Josh, the gbit ptp will be done through fiber to the building, then
 whoever in the building wants service.. will pay set up to get set
 up with ethernet or fiber to my office.

 I know I could get enough business inside the building to cover half
 the cost of everything because I'm pretty sure there is a company
 here with quite a few T1's, overpaying and not getting what they deserve.
 I've always been a proponent of maxing stuff out so I will be a
 great benefit to the tenants.

 So if I'm able to set something up externally, I may be able to
 actually break even and profit some,  I actually know I could profit
 but I want this to be more of a service to the people who are unable
 to get anything decent out here.

 Thanks

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Justin Wilson li...@mtin.net wrote:
    Nice introduction to the WISPA community. Make fun of the name.
 I even
 recommended this person check out WISPA from the Ubiquity forums.
  Anyhow,
 welcome.  I would suggest reading through the archives for some
 good discussions on things.

    Justin
 --
 Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
 http://www.mtin.net/blog
 Wisp Consulting  Tower Climbing  Network Support



 From: Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com
 Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 09:28:35 -0700
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 My first recommendation would be to legally change your name from
 Finkle Dinkle to something that sounds a little more business-like.
 I'd recommend something like Joe Smith or Bob Jones.

 finkle dinkle wrote:
 So, I've got space in a building in So. Cal with a lot of
 neighbors with crappy connections. In the beginning, I wanted to
 bring in a gig PTP from the datacenter 12 miles away... I'm not a
 salesman, I think with the bandwidth I have available at the DC +
 the of the PTP, I could've made everyone in the building happy, at
 least 20 tenants if I could convince them.. doubt I could.

 Anyway, I have potential access to the roof, I'd have to ask.

 Are there any laws if I want to sell service ?

 If I want to provide service to lets just say 50 clients (not 

Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread j2840fl
Rocket w/matching sector
Sent from my BlackBerry®

-Original Message-
From: finkle dinkle char...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 17:51:37 
To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

Well, I'm not saying I want a single AP, just trying to determine
which route with UBNT products would support the most per client

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com wrote:
 I was thinking the same thing... I want to be business class and go the 
 cheap-o route.  By a Yugo, get Yugo quality...especially if you think 50 
 business customers on a single ap is going to work well in an urban area with 
 UBNT.

 Regards,
 Chuck Hogg
 Shelby Broadband
 502-722-9292
 ch...@shelbybb.com
 http://www.shelbybb.com


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
 Behalf Of Jerry Richardson
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 6:12 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Your Moto bias will cost you.

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
 Behalf Of finkle dinkle
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:44 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Yea, I will want to specialize only in businesses truthfully, when I say that 
 I will support residential, they're going to pay business rates and I will 
 hand pick the people if they call me..  I dont want headaches

 Unfortunately I do not knowingly buy Motorola brand products for personal 
 reasons.

 I do want to stick to ubnt brand products but I dont know exactly how many 
 NanoBridge M5's I could connect to a single one, so I dont want to have to 
 end up with the entire roof covered with antenna's.

 The 50mbit I could offer internally with ethernet or vdsl would be great if 
 it was symmetrical (vdsl), I want to be able to do this, just trying to 
 figure out how much I'd sell 50/50.

 Thanks

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Jerry Richardson jrichard...@aircloud.com 
 wrote:
 Thought BPL was dead

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 On Behalf Of RickG
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:28 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Or BPL.

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Jeremie Chism jchi...@gmail.com wrote:
 I was thinking the same thing. Use a mini dslam on the free pairs to
 get Internet in the rooms. Ptp to the building and dsl to the customer.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On May 27, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just-
 micro.com wrote:

 Then you could provide the access via dsl in the building.  That
 would be the logical route to go I think.

 -Richard

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 On
 Behalf Of finkle dinkle
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 1:08 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Justin, appreciate your suggestion.  I've been looking around and
 will continue to.

 Josh, the gbit ptp will be done through fiber to the building, then
 whoever in the building wants service.. will pay set up to get set
 up with ethernet or fiber to my office.

 I know I could get enough business inside the building to cover half
 the cost of everything because I'm pretty sure there is a company
 here with quite a few T1's, overpaying and not getting what they deserve.
 I've always been a proponent of maxing stuff out so I will be a
 great benefit to the tenants.

 So if I'm able to set something up externally, I may be able to
 actually break even and profit some,  I actually know I could profit
 but I want this to be more of a service to the people who are unable
 to get anything decent out here.

 Thanks

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Justin Wilson li...@mtin.net wrote:
    Nice introduction to the WISPA community. Make fun of the name.
 I even
 recommended this person check out WISPA from the Ubiquity forums.
  Anyhow,
 welcome.  I would suggest reading through the archives for some
 good discussions on things.

    Justin
 --
 Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
 http://www.mtin.net/blog
 Wisp Consulting  Tower Climbing  Network Support



 From: Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com
 Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 09:28:35 -0700
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 My first recommendation would be to legally change your name from
 Finkle Dinkle to something that sounds a little more business-like.
 I'd recommend something like Joe Smith or Bob Jones.

 finkle dinkle wrote:
 So, I've got space in a building in So. Cal with a lot of
 neighbors with crappy connections. In the beginning, I wanted to
 bring in a gig PTP from the datacenter 12 miles away... I'm not a
 salesman, I think with the bandwidth I have available at the DC +
 the of the PTP, I could've made everyone in the building happy, at
 least 

Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread Josh Luthman
CPEs are limited on APs.  APs are limited in spectrum.

On 5/27/10, finkle dinkle char...@gmail.com wrote:
 Well, I'm not saying I want a single AP, just trying to determine
 which route with UBNT products would support the most per client

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com wrote:
 I was thinking the same thing... I want to be business class and go the
 cheap-o route.  By a Yugo, get Yugo quality...especially if you think 50
 business customers on a single ap is going to work well in an urban area
 with UBNT.

 Regards,
 Chuck Hogg
 Shelby Broadband
 502-722-9292
 ch...@shelbybb.com
 http://www.shelbybb.com


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Jerry Richardson
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 6:12 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Your Moto bias will cost you.

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of finkle dinkle
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:44 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Yea, I will want to specialize only in businesses truthfully, when I say
 that I will support residential, they're going to pay business rates and I
 will hand pick the people if they call me..  I dont want headaches

 Unfortunately I do not knowingly buy Motorola brand products for personal
 reasons.

 I do want to stick to ubnt brand products but I dont know exactly how many
 NanoBridge M5's I could connect to a single one, so I dont want to have to
 end up with the entire roof covered with antenna's.

 The 50mbit I could offer internally with ethernet or vdsl would be great
 if it was symmetrical (vdsl), I want to be able to do this, just trying to
 figure out how much I'd sell 50/50.

 Thanks

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Jerry Richardson
 jrichard...@aircloud.com wrote:
 Thought BPL was dead

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 On Behalf Of RickG
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:28 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Or BPL.

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Jeremie Chism jchi...@gmail.com wrote:
 I was thinking the same thing. Use a mini dslam on the free pairs to
 get Internet in the rooms. Ptp to the building and dsl to the customer.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On May 27, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just-
 micro.com wrote:

 Then you could provide the access via dsl in the building.  That
 would be the logical route to go I think.

 -Richard

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 On
 Behalf Of finkle dinkle
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 1:08 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Justin, appreciate your suggestion.  I've been looking around and
 will continue to.

 Josh, the gbit ptp will be done through fiber to the building, then
 whoever in the building wants service.. will pay set up to get set
 up with ethernet or fiber to my office.

 I know I could get enough business inside the building to cover half
 the cost of everything because I'm pretty sure there is a company
 here with quite a few T1's, overpaying and not getting what they
 deserve.
 I've always been a proponent of maxing stuff out so I will be a
 great benefit to the tenants.

 So if I'm able to set something up externally, I may be able to
 actually break even and profit some,  I actually know I could profit
 but I want this to be more of a service to the people who are unable
 to get anything decent out here.

 Thanks

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Justin Wilson li...@mtin.net wrote:
    Nice introduction to the WISPA community. Make fun of the name.
 I even
 recommended this person check out WISPA from the Ubiquity forums.
  Anyhow,
 welcome.  I would suggest reading through the archives for some
 good discussions on things.

    Justin
 --
 Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
 http://www.mtin.net/blog
 Wisp Consulting  Tower Climbing  Network Support



 From: Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com
 Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 09:28:35 -0700
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 My first recommendation would be to legally change your name from
 Finkle Dinkle to something that sounds a little more business-like.
 I'd recommend something like Joe Smith or Bob Jones.

 finkle dinkle wrote:
 So, I've got space in a building in So. Cal with a lot of
 neighbors with crappy connections. In the beginning, I wanted to
 bring in a gig PTP from the datacenter 12 miles away... I'm not a
 salesman, I think with the bandwidth I have available at the DC +
 the of the PTP, I could've made everyone in the building happy, at
 least 20 tenants if I could convince them.. doubt I could.

 Anyway, I have potential access to the roof, I'd have to ask.

 Are there 

Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread Chuck Hogg
And Motorola has a unique way of reusing spectrum...I've been blown away how 
you can reuse spectrum so easily with Canopy.  I've got 4 towers that can see 
each other on the same frequency using canopy...do that with 
MT/UBNT/Tranzeo/StarOS...and you have this little problem called 
self-interference.

Regards,
Chuck Hogg
Shelby Broadband
502-722-9292
ch...@shelbybb.com
http://www.shelbybb.com


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 9:03 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

CPEs are limited on APs.  APs are limited in spectrum.

On 5/27/10, finkle dinkle char...@gmail.com wrote:
 Well, I'm not saying I want a single AP, just trying to determine 
 which route with UBNT products would support the most per client

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com wrote:
 I was thinking the same thing... I want to be business class and go 
 the cheap-o route.  By a Yugo, get Yugo quality...especially if you 
 think 50 business customers on a single ap is going to work well in 
 an urban area with UBNT.

 Regards,
 Chuck Hogg
 Shelby Broadband
 502-722-9292
 ch...@shelbybb.com
 http://www.shelbybb.com


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] 
 On Behalf Of Jerry Richardson
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 6:12 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Your Moto bias will cost you.

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] 
 On Behalf Of finkle dinkle
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:44 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Yea, I will want to specialize only in businesses truthfully, when I 
 say that I will support residential, they're going to pay business 
 rates and I will hand pick the people if they call me..  I dont want 
 headaches

 Unfortunately I do not knowingly buy Motorola brand products for 
 personal reasons.

 I do want to stick to ubnt brand products but I dont know exactly how 
 many NanoBridge M5's I could connect to a single one, so I dont want 
 to have to end up with the entire roof covered with antenna's.

 The 50mbit I could offer internally with ethernet or vdsl would be 
 great if it was symmetrical (vdsl), I want to be able to do this, 
 just trying to figure out how much I'd sell 50/50.

 Thanks

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Jerry Richardson 
 jrichard...@aircloud.com wrote:
 Thought BPL was dead

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 On Behalf Of RickG
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:28 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Or BPL.

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Jeremie Chism jchi...@gmail.com wrote:
 I was thinking the same thing. Use a mini dslam on the free pairs 
 to get Internet in the rooms. Ptp to the building and dsl to the customer.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On May 27, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just- 
 micro.com wrote:

 Then you could provide the access via dsl in the building.  That 
 would be the logical route to go I think.

 -Richard

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
 [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 On
 Behalf Of finkle dinkle
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 1:08 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Justin, appreciate your suggestion.  I've been looking around and 
 will continue to.

 Josh, the gbit ptp will be done through fiber to the building, 
 then whoever in the building wants service.. will pay set up to 
 get set up with ethernet or fiber to my office.

 I know I could get enough business inside the building to cover 
 half the cost of everything because I'm pretty sure there is a 
 company here with quite a few T1's, overpaying and not getting 
 what they deserve.
 I've always been a proponent of maxing stuff out so I will be a 
 great benefit to the tenants.

 So if I'm able to set something up externally, I may be able to 
 actually break even and profit some,  I actually know I could 
 profit but I want this to be more of a service to the people who 
 are unable to get anything decent out here.

 Thanks

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Justin Wilson li...@mtin.net wrote:
    Nice introduction to the WISPA community. Make fun of the name.
 I even
 recommended this person check out WISPA from the Ubiquity forums.
  Anyhow,
 welcome.  I would suggest reading through the archives for some 
 good discussions on things.

    Justin
 --
 Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
 http://www.mtin.net/blog
 Wisp Consulting  Tower Climbing  Network Support



 From: Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com
 Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 09:28:35 -0700
 To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 My first recommendation 

Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread Jerry Richardson
if you are not going with moto, then the ubiquity airmax stuff would
be as good a choice as any. you might get 20 business class subs per
ap and you should be able to get 3 120deg sectors on the roof.  you
will run into self interference problems at around 20 subs per AP.
unfortunately you will already be committed to the ubiquity and there
is no going back. gotta rip it all out and rebuild with canopy or add
more AP's in another band.

compare that to 50+ subs per canopy AP and none of the self
interference problems inherent in non-sync'd gear.

~Sent mobile~

On May 27, 2010, at 5:53 PM, j284...@yahoo.com j284...@yahoo.com
wrote:

 Rocket w/matching sector
 Sent from my BlackBerry®

 -Original Message-
 From: finkle dinkle char...@gmail.com
 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 17:51:37
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Well, I'm not saying I want a single AP, just trying to determine
 which route with UBNT products would support the most per client

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com
 wrote:
 I was thinking the same thing... I want to be business class and go
 the cheap-o route.  By a Yugo, get Yugo quality...especially if you
 think 50 business customers on a single ap is going to work well in
 an urban area with UBNT.

 Regards,
 Chuck Hogg
 Shelby Broadband
 502-722-9292
 ch...@shelbybb.com
 http://www.shelbybb.com


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-
 boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jerry Richardson
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 6:12 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Your Moto bias will cost you.

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-
 boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of finkle dinkle
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:44 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Yea, I will want to specialize only in businesses truthfully, when
 I say that I will support residential, they're going to pay
 business rates and I will hand pick the people if they call me..  I
 dont want headaches

 Unfortunately I do not knowingly buy Motorola brand products for
 personal reasons.

 I do want to stick to ubnt brand products but I dont know exactly
 how many NanoBridge M5's I could connect to a single one, so I dont
 want to have to end up with the entire roof covered with antenna's.

 The 50mbit I could offer internally with ethernet or vdsl would be
 great if it was symmetrical (vdsl), I want to be able to do this,
 just trying to figure out how much I'd sell 50/50.

 Thanks

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Jerry Richardson jrichard...@aircloud.com
  wrote:
 Thought BPL was dead

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 On Behalf Of RickG
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:28 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Or BPL.

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Jeremie Chism jchi...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 I was thinking the same thing. Use a mini dslam on the free pairs
 to
 get Internet in the rooms. Ptp to the building and dsl to the
 customer.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On May 27, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just-
 micro.com wrote:

 Then you could provide the access via dsl in the building.  That
 would be the logical route to go I think.

 -Richard

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-
 boun...@wispa.org]
 On
 Behalf Of finkle dinkle
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 1:08 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Justin, appreciate your suggestion.  I've been looking around and
 will continue to.

 Josh, the gbit ptp will be done through fiber to the building,
 then
 whoever in the building wants service.. will pay set up to get set
 up with ethernet or fiber to my office.

 I know I could get enough business inside the building to cover
 half
 the cost of everything because I'm pretty sure there is a company
 here with quite a few T1's, overpaying and not getting what they
 deserve.
 I've always been a proponent of maxing stuff out so I will be a
 great benefit to the tenants.

 So if I'm able to set something up externally, I may be able to
 actually break even and profit some,  I actually know I could
 profit
 but I want this to be more of a service to the people who are
 unable
 to get anything decent out here.

 Thanks

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Justin Wilson li...@mtin.net
 wrote:
   Nice introduction to the WISPA community. Make fun of the name.
 I even
 recommended this person check out WISPA from the Ubiquity forums.
 Anyhow,
 welcome.  I would suggest reading through the archives for some
 good discussions on things.

   Justin
 --
 Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
 http://www.mtin.net/blog
 Wisp Consulting  Tower Climbing  Network Support



 From: Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com
 Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
 Date: Thu, 27 May 

Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread Josh Luthman
I don't know about 50 - it totally depends on your customers' bandwidth rates.

On 5/27/10, Jerry Richardson jrichard...@aircloud.com wrote:
 if you are not going with moto, then the ubiquity airmax stuff would
 be as good a choice as any. you might get 20 business class subs per
 ap and you should be able to get 3 120deg sectors on the roof.  you
 will run into self interference problems at around 20 subs per AP.
 unfortunately you will already be committed to the ubiquity and there
 is no going back. gotta rip it all out and rebuild with canopy or add
 more AP's in another band.

 compare that to 50+ subs per canopy AP and none of the self
 interference problems inherent in non-sync'd gear.

 ~Sent mobile~

 On May 27, 2010, at 5:53 PM, j284...@yahoo.com j284...@yahoo.com
 wrote:

 Rocket w/matching sector
 Sent from my BlackBerry®

 -Original Message-
 From: finkle dinkle char...@gmail.com
 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 17:51:37
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Well, I'm not saying I want a single AP, just trying to determine
 which route with UBNT products would support the most per client

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com
 wrote:
 I was thinking the same thing... I want to be business class and go
 the cheap-o route.  By a Yugo, get Yugo quality...especially if you
 think 50 business customers on a single ap is going to work well in
 an urban area with UBNT.

 Regards,
 Chuck Hogg
 Shelby Broadband
 502-722-9292
 ch...@shelbybb.com
 http://www.shelbybb.com


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-
 boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jerry Richardson
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 6:12 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Your Moto bias will cost you.

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-
 boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of finkle dinkle
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:44 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Yea, I will want to specialize only in businesses truthfully, when
 I say that I will support residential, they're going to pay
 business rates and I will hand pick the people if they call me..  I
 dont want headaches

 Unfortunately I do not knowingly buy Motorola brand products for
 personal reasons.

 I do want to stick to ubnt brand products but I dont know exactly
 how many NanoBridge M5's I could connect to a single one, so I dont
 want to have to end up with the entire roof covered with antenna's.

 The 50mbit I could offer internally with ethernet or vdsl would be
 great if it was symmetrical (vdsl), I want to be able to do this,
 just trying to figure out how much I'd sell 50/50.

 Thanks

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Jerry Richardson
 jrichard...@aircloud.com
  wrote:
 Thought BPL was dead

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 On Behalf Of RickG
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:28 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Or BPL.

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Jeremie Chism jchi...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 I was thinking the same thing. Use a mini dslam on the free pairs
 to
 get Internet in the rooms. Ptp to the building and dsl to the
 customer.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On May 27, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just-
 micro.com wrote:

 Then you could provide the access via dsl in the building.  That
 would be the logical route to go I think.

 -Richard

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-
 boun...@wispa.org]
 On
 Behalf Of finkle dinkle
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 1:08 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Justin, appreciate your suggestion.  I've been looking around and
 will continue to.

 Josh, the gbit ptp will be done through fiber to the building,
 then
 whoever in the building wants service.. will pay set up to get set
 up with ethernet or fiber to my office.

 I know I could get enough business inside the building to cover
 half
 the cost of everything because I'm pretty sure there is a company
 here with quite a few T1's, overpaying and not getting what they
 deserve.
 I've always been a proponent of maxing stuff out so I will be a
 great benefit to the tenants.

 So if I'm able to set something up externally, I may be able to
 actually break even and profit some,  I actually know I could
 profit
 but I want this to be more of a service to the people who are
 unable
 to get anything decent out here.

 Thanks

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Justin Wilson li...@mtin.net
 wrote:
   Nice introduction to the WISPA community. Make fun of the name.
 I even
 recommended this person check out WISPA from the Ubiquity forums.
 Anyhow,
 welcome.  I would suggest reading through the archives for some
 good discussions on things.

   Justin
 --
 Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
 http://www.mtin.net/blog
 

Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread Chuck Hogg
Well...you need to look at it from another standpoint.  A vast majority
of businesses that we are going to be signing up are either 3-6MB/s DSL
or us.  You can oversubscribe a 430 AP very well at those rates.  And I
would argue that those customers wanting more bandwidth would be better
served with a PtP connection and would definitely pay for it,
considering the cost of the alternative (Fiber,DS3, MetroE, etc.).

Regards,
Chuck Hogg
Shelby Broadband
502-722-9292
ch...@shelbybb.com
http://www.shelbybb.com


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 9:21 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

I don't know about 50 - it totally depends on your customers' bandwidth
rates.

On 5/27/10, Jerry Richardson jrichard...@aircloud.com wrote:
 if you are not going with moto, then the ubiquity airmax stuff would 
 be as good a choice as any. you might get 20 business class subs per 
 ap and you should be able to get 3 120deg sectors on the roof.  you 
 will run into self interference problems at around 20 subs per AP.
 unfortunately you will already be committed to the ubiquity and there 
 is no going back. gotta rip it all out and rebuild with canopy or add 
 more AP's in another band.

 compare that to 50+ subs per canopy AP and none of the self 
 interference problems inherent in non-sync'd gear.

 ~Sent mobile~

 On May 27, 2010, at 5:53 PM, j284...@yahoo.com j284...@yahoo.com
 wrote:

 Rocket w/matching sector
 Sent from my BlackBerry(r)

 -Original Message-
 From: finkle dinkle char...@gmail.com
 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 17:51:37
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Well, I'm not saying I want a single AP, just trying to determine 
 which route with UBNT products would support the most per client

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com
 wrote:
 I was thinking the same thing... I want to be business class and go 
 the cheap-o route.  By a Yugo, get Yugo quality...especially if you 
 think 50 business customers on a single ap is going to work well in 
 an urban area with UBNT.

 Regards,
 Chuck Hogg
 Shelby Broadband
 502-722-9292
 ch...@shelbybb.com
 http://www.shelbybb.com


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless- 
 boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jerry Richardson
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 6:12 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Your Moto bias will cost you.

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless- 
 boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of finkle dinkle
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:44 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Yea, I will want to specialize only in businesses truthfully, when I

 say that I will support residential, they're going to pay business 
 rates and I will hand pick the people if they call me..  I dont want

 headaches

 Unfortunately I do not knowingly buy Motorola brand products for 
 personal reasons.

 I do want to stick to ubnt brand products but I dont know exactly 
 how many NanoBridge M5's I could connect to a single one, so I dont 
 want to have to end up with the entire roof covered with antenna's.

 The 50mbit I could offer internally with ethernet or vdsl would be 
 great if it was symmetrical (vdsl), I want to be able to do this, 
 just trying to figure out how much I'd sell 50/50.

 Thanks

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Jerry Richardson 
 jrichard...@aircloud.com
  wrote:
 Thought BPL was dead

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
 [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 On Behalf Of RickG
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:28 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Or BPL.

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Jeremie Chism jchi...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 I was thinking the same thing. Use a mini dslam on the free pairs 
 to get Internet in the rooms. Ptp to the building and dsl to the 
 customer.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On May 27, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just- 
 micro.com wrote:

 Then you could provide the access via dsl in the building.  That 
 would be the logical route to go I think.

 -Richard

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless- 
 boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of finkle dinkle
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 1:08 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Justin, appreciate your suggestion.  I've been looking around and

 will continue to.

 Josh, the gbit ptp will be done through fiber to the building, 
 then whoever in the building wants service.. will pay set up to 
 get set up with ethernet or fiber to my office.

 I know I could get enough business inside the building to cover 
 half the cost of everything because I'm pretty sure there is a 
 company here with quite a few T1's, overpaying and not 

Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread finkle dinkle
Yep, I will look and test ubnt equipment.. I'm in no rush, just
learning legalities and stuff.

I never thought about vdsl from the phone room, that's a great idea..
Ultimately I'd love to bring a gig ptp in there and be able to do
everything that I wanted to do in the past and be able to subsidize it
by offering some wireless customers heavy bandwidth, I could beat the
wimax pricing from towerstream at least.

I'm looking to only gain like 10 business clients using wireless.  I
dont want to overwhelm myself.

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com wrote:
 Well...you need to look at it from another standpoint.  A vast majority
 of businesses that we are going to be signing up are either 3-6MB/s DSL
 or us.  You can oversubscribe a 430 AP very well at those rates.  And I
 would argue that those customers wanting more bandwidth would be better
 served with a PtP connection and would definitely pay for it,
 considering the cost of the alternative (Fiber,DS3, MetroE, etc.).

 Regards,
 Chuck Hogg
 Shelby Broadband
 502-722-9292
 ch...@shelbybb.com
 http://www.shelbybb.com


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
 Behalf Of Josh Luthman
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 9:21 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 I don't know about 50 - it totally depends on your customers' bandwidth
 rates.

 On 5/27/10, Jerry Richardson jrichard...@aircloud.com wrote:
 if you are not going with moto, then the ubiquity airmax stuff would
 be as good a choice as any. you might get 20 business class subs per
 ap and you should be able to get 3 120deg sectors on the roof.  you
 will run into self interference problems at around 20 subs per AP.
 unfortunately you will already be committed to the ubiquity and there
 is no going back. gotta rip it all out and rebuild with canopy or add
 more AP's in another band.

 compare that to 50+ subs per canopy AP and none of the self
 interference problems inherent in non-sync'd gear.

 ~Sent mobile~

 On May 27, 2010, at 5:53 PM, j284...@yahoo.com j284...@yahoo.com
 wrote:

 Rocket w/matching sector
 Sent from my BlackBerry(r)

 -Original Message-
 From: finkle dinkle char...@gmail.com
 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 17:51:37
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Well, I'm not saying I want a single AP, just trying to determine
 which route with UBNT products would support the most per client

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com
 wrote:
 I was thinking the same thing... I want to be business class and go
 the cheap-o route.  By a Yugo, get Yugo quality...especially if you
 think 50 business customers on a single ap is going to work well in
 an urban area with UBNT.

 Regards,
 Chuck Hogg
 Shelby Broadband
 502-722-9292
 ch...@shelbybb.com
 http://www.shelbybb.com


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-
 boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jerry Richardson
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 6:12 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Your Moto bias will cost you.

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-
 boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of finkle dinkle
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:44 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Yea, I will want to specialize only in businesses truthfully, when I

 say that I will support residential, they're going to pay business
 rates and I will hand pick the people if they call me..  I dont want

 headaches

 Unfortunately I do not knowingly buy Motorola brand products for
 personal reasons.

 I do want to stick to ubnt brand products but I dont know exactly
 how many NanoBridge M5's I could connect to a single one, so I dont
 want to have to end up with the entire roof covered with antenna's.

 The 50mbit I could offer internally with ethernet or vdsl would be
 great if it was symmetrical (vdsl), I want to be able to do this,
 just trying to figure out how much I'd sell 50/50.

 Thanks

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Jerry Richardson
 jrichard...@aircloud.com
  wrote:
 Thought BPL was dead

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
 [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
 On Behalf Of RickG
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:28 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Or BPL.

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Jeremie Chism jchi...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 I was thinking the same thing. Use a mini dslam on the free pairs
 to get Internet in the rooms. Ptp to the building and dsl to the
 customer.

 Sent from my iPhone

 On May 27, 2010, at 12:11 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just-
 micro.com wrote:

 Then you could provide the access via dsl in the building.  That
 would be the logical route to go I think.

 -Richard

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-
 boun...@wispa.org] On 

Re: [WISPA] How the FCC Proposes the Regulate Broadband

2010-05-27 Thread Tom DeReggi
MDK,

I applaud your Email.  It will take some time to fully digest all the 
relevent points that were addressed.
I dont agree with everything that you suggested, but I do agree with a 
signfiicant part of it.
One realization that you brought up which I agree with is regarding that we 
will reach a time where a line will need to be drawn in the sand, and we'll 
need to know which side of the line we are going to be standing on. On some 
of these topics, playing both sides simply isn't going to be possible.

I have a couple quick comments

1) Anything posted on the general list will be google indexed for the world 
to see. Including the apposing side.
In my opinion, it is not wise to debate WISPA's strategy to combat these 
important issue, in that environment.
For that reason, I have been disccussing NBP and TItleII reclassification 
topics on the member list which is only available to wispa members to read.
Its also important that WISPA represent's WISPA member. When debating on an 
open list, its really hard for me to decipher which comments are comming 
from members and which are not. For example, a Verizon lobbiest could be 
masking themselves as a WISP, and I'd never know.
I'd also like to re-engage legislative committee list, to start formulating 
a plan, so members list does not get saturated with policy posts. I welcome 
members to join legislative committe who are interested in debating this. 
The more members that join the committee, the bigger the change the 
conclusion will be a reflection of member's opinion.

2) I think much debate is needed regarding strategy for these important 
topics. I think its to early to ask members to vote on what our stance 
should be. Because there has been little debate to challenge potential 
stances, and many members may not yet be fully versed with all the facts, so 
some may make an uninformed decission, that could have results different 
than what they expected by taking their stance.

3) Stategy is needed. Its easy to come up with what we want. The hard part 
is to justify and convince policy makers to give us that. And what we want 
may not be realistic to achieve. This is serious business, we dont want to 
pick a stance that will leave us with nothing at all at the end, because we 
didn;t face realitiy. We cant forget that FCC and Congress also already have 
an idea of what they want.   There are many complicated issues here. Its not 
that I dont want to poll members, I am very interested in what they have to 
say and think. But there is also a huge advantage to creating a think tank 
environment first, challenged by council, and to share results with 
memebrship for them to consider before deciding their position..

For example, Congress and FCC have an obligation to help consumers, and 
consumers want their broadband options improved. To help, money is needed. 
USF has been identified as a money source, by the FCC and Congress. Its very 
unlikely they'll vote to wipe out a money source that actively regenerates 
funds. Its so much more likely they'll try to repurpose those funds, to 
solve a problem. Sure we can fight to shutdown USF, many of us would prefer 
that, but the flip side is if USF is not shut down, and we do not lobby for 
how to best repurpose it, it will be guaranteed that fund will go to or 
competitors in mass proportions, and we will get harmed by that, I'd argue 
possibly even extinguished by that.  Another example was BTOP Round2. In 
Round2, much funds will go for inter- networking government locations. In 
one sense its an outrage that huge amounts of money will go to build 
networks that may not be needed, and take revenue away from the price sector 
providers. And few WISPs will see a dime of it. But on the flip side it was 
possibly a victory. What it also meant was that WISP's last mile networks 
will be less likely to get overbuilt. Last mile monoploies will be less 
likely to get created. And the most Rural areas were targeted, so less 
chance of a WISP's prime subscriber base market being over built. OR for 
example, many can argue money was most needed for Last mile, but lobbying 
for that had more risk, if the chances were moeny would just be spent to 
build a monopoly to put the rest of us out of business, since we are last 
mile provider?  What I'm trying to say is everything is a double edge sword 
in this business.  You hit on a good point with USF. Terminating USF and not 
allowing it to go for broadband would be the least riskful thing for WISPs, 
and a small price to pay to not be eligible for funds. But, is that 
realistic? That Congress and FCC will turn away a $20billion dollar fund? 
That $20billion will gain a lot of votes, and it wont result in increasing 
taxes, since its paid for by the greedy (public distorted perception,  not 
mine) Telcos, right?  We need a well thought out strategy.

I think that USF reform is a huge part of the desire to reclassify broadband 
as TItleII, and probably the bigest topic 

Re: [WISPA] 900MHz Backhaul Solutions

2010-05-27 Thread Justin Wilson
I used a MoTo 900 AM  SM for a backhaul to a remote site for 3 years.
Was able to push 3Megs so to the site.  Was 5 miles with nowhere near LOS.
Used Yagis on both ends.  Link was flawless.   Before that I used some
Waverider 900 gear.  It was struck by lightning so I changed to Canopy.

Justin

-- 
Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
http://www.mtin.net/blog
Wisp Consulting ­ Tower Climbing ­ Network Support



From: Pat O'Connor p...@inlandnet.com
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 15:54:43 -0700
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] 900MHz Backhaul Solutions

I just want to see what everyone else is using and what their
experiences are.

Thanks,

Pat





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread Tom DeReggi
I am not disagreeing with the advantages of Canopy. No doubt Canopy is a 
quality carrier grade type system.

BUT, to be fair There are other factors to consider..

1) Syncing can be effective for spectrum reuse, and extremely useful. But, 
it can become less effective and sometimes can still be subject to 
self-interference as the nework grows, such as when the sub's distince away 
from towers varies drastically between sectors.  The reason us that sectors 
can hear CPEs behinds it in some capacity, not just teh CPEs in front of it. 
For example, IF sector 1 has a sub at half mile, and Sector2 has sub at 10 
miles. Sector2 may hear sector1's sub louder than it hears its own 
subscriber 10 miles away.  For syncing to work optimally without self 
interference, all the Client's signal levels at the AP ideally should be 
received at similar signal strenth, so that the Front to back ratios of 
sector antennas is enough to isolate the two sectors. Whether that is 
possible may depend on the frequency range you use, and what antennas are 
available to easilly deploy.  With Canopy C/I spec of 3db helps a lot, but 
the plastic case lets more noise reach the unit.  We ran into this when 
comparingto Trango. trango only had about 7db C/I, but the thick metal case 
had muchbetter F?B than Canopy did, so it average out.

2)  Canopies have signficantly shorter range because by default config 
(integrated antenna models) they use APs and SUs with lower DB antennas and 
wider beamwidths, so not able to operate at peak EIRP. Also note that gain 
by antenna has a double effect. Meaning for an AP, it increases the receives 
from CPEs as well as the transmits to CPEs.  So a large penalty is taken if 
an AP has an lower DB antenna than competing products.

Canopy has many different models now, and antenna design is not the same 
with them all, so I dont mean to stereotype the product line.

In an Ubquiti AirMax solutions, they have optimally strong sector antenna 
options. And they have the flexibilty for a wide array of antenna choices 
for CPEs.
That flexibility can be useful, and it is affordable to achieve.  Saying 
that Ubiquiti wont be able to scale, and one day will need to be pulled out, 
is not necessarilly true.

There are enhancements to beef up Ubiquiti. For example, some jsut made a 
nice steel antenna shield, that adds a huge amount of Front to back ratio 
teh the Ubiquiti antenna.


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: Jerry Richardson jrichard...@aircloud.com
To: j284...@yahoo.com; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 9:12 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp


 if you are not going with moto, then the ubiquity airmax stuff would
 be as good a choice as any. you might get 20 business class subs per
 ap and you should be able to get 3 120deg sectors on the roof.  you
 will run into self interference problems at around 20 subs per AP.
 unfortunately you will already be committed to the ubiquity and there
 is no going back. gotta rip it all out and rebuild with canopy or add
 more AP's in another band.

 compare that to 50+ subs per canopy AP and none of the self
 interference problems inherent in non-sync'd gear.

 ~Sent mobile~

 On May 27, 2010, at 5:53 PM, j284...@yahoo.com j284...@yahoo.com
 wrote:

 Rocket w/matching sector
 Sent from my BlackBerry®

 -Original Message-
 From: finkle dinkle char...@gmail.com
 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 17:51:37
 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Well, I'm not saying I want a single AP, just trying to determine
 which route with UBNT products would support the most per client

 On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com
 wrote:
 I was thinking the same thing... I want to be business class and go
 the cheap-o route.  By a Yugo, get Yugo quality...especially if you
 think 50 business customers on a single ap is going to work well in
 an urban area with UBNT.

 Regards,
 Chuck Hogg
 Shelby Broadband
 502-722-9292
 ch...@shelbybb.com
 http://www.shelbybb.com


 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-
 boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Jerry Richardson
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 6:12 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Your Moto bias will cost you.

 -Original Message-
 From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-
 boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of finkle dinkle
 Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 2:44 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

 Yea, I will want to specialize only in businesses truthfully, when
 I say that I will support residential, they're going to pay
 business rates and I will hand pick the people if they call me..  I
 dont want headaches

 Unfortunately I do not knowingly buy Motorola brand products for
 personal reasons.

 I do want to stick to ubnt brand products but I dont know 

[WISPA] Panelists Needed for Regional Show

2010-05-27 Thread Rick Harnish
I am seeking three (3) panelists for each of the tracks below.  Please send
me an email if you are interested.  I would like to have good representation
from multiple companies so don't be bashful.  I'm also looking for two (2)
WISPs who have a success story to tell.  This is for the WISPA Regional
Meeting in St. Louis on July 21st and 22nd.

 


10:30 - 11:30

TV White Spaces Panel

TBD

Intro to WiMax Panel

TBD

VoIP I Panel

Keith Rivers - Great Auk Wireless - Tentative


11:30 - 12:30

Broadband Stimulus Panel

TBD

Into the Future - How to Deploy Fiber Panel

TBD

 

Improving Your WISP Marketing

(Website design, online press releases, using social media, search engine
optimization, etc.)

TBD

 


:30 - 2:30


3650 MHz Panel  


 Josh Garza - Great Auk Wireless

 

Tower Technology I Panel

Getting Physical - Safety, selection, design, guying, erection, climbing,
maintenance; etc.)

Moderator: Jack Unger

TBD


Network Management Panel


Moderator: Matt Larsen

TBD


2:30 - 3:30

Universal Service Fund Panel -Past, Present and Future

Moderator: Jon Allen or David Kaufman (Rini/Coran)

TBD

 

Tower Technology II Panel - Wireless Design -

AP placement, power, coax, Cat5, lightning protection, antenna placement,
grounding, etc)

Moderator: Jack Unger

Bob Morola - Great Auk Wireless - Tentative 


Email and Web Hosting Panel


TBD

 


11:30 - 12:30

Broadband Mapping Panel: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly

Moderator: Matt Larsen

Brian Webster

[others selected by Brian Webster]

 


2:10 - 2:30

Principal Member Success Story #1

 


3:10 - 3:30

Principal Member Success Story #2

 

 

Respectively,

 

Rick Harnish

President

WISPA

260-307-4000 cell

866-317-2851 WISPA Office

Skype: rick.harnish.

rharn...@wispa.org

 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] How the FCC Proposes the Regulate Broadband

2010-05-27 Thread Scottie Arnett
This is in no way way to put your responses down JP...but in almost all
your responses you have responded as a WISP that is making money

 Yes, I expect USF money to be used as bait in how this plays out.

SNIP

 I see no reason to have permanent USF subsidy. It is money down the toilet
 over the long
 run and a tax that seriously hinders people's ability to afford
 communications services.
 A big part of current USF money goes to switching which I see as an
 antiquated
 hierarchy where small rural towns have their own switch, with all it's
 maintenance and
 support. With the advent of cheap high capacity fiber created by ARRA
 projects and
 private upgrades, smaller digital switches, wholesale access to switch
 partitions, and
 VOIP, there is no technical reason to permanently subsidize modern
 distributed
 switching. If permanent support for switching were tapered off, the
 rural phone
 companies could find cheaper ways to do voice switching. The cellcos
 almost all have
 some sort of architecture where all their sites in the state go back to
 single
 state-wide switches. When not used for switching, permanent USF pays for
 monopoly
 infrastructure that discourages rural competition by irrationally priced
 services.


The current USF charges are a tax as you put it in high density areas on
telco charges. That is used to give rural telcos money to build out and
sustain telephone coverage to very under served(remote areas...like 10-20
houses per square mile).

The current plan on USF is to only let one entity have access to this. If
you have any competitor that is an ILEC or CLEC, you can pretty much kiss
your luck of getting this good by! It would put too much work on an
already understaffed FCC, and they already favor telcos over anything
else.

 A tax rebate would be highly preferable to USF, as it would be a reduction
 in taxation
 rather than an increase in taxation. Either way, non-permanent support is
 the only thing
 I can advocate.

 I like the idea of non-permanent support for unserved/underserved areas.
 My state's
 ConnectME fund is looking at a one-time ISP payment (per customer) to
 support high-cost
 installations to unserved locations. The details of how much and under
 what conditions
 are undecided, but it would address the high CPE/installation costs that
 plague
 broadband expansion and would not cause long term dependence on
 government. This would
 be an alternative to the present system of government funded
 infrastructure projects.
 This would be less apt to stir a hornets nest of capitalism versus
 government funded
 project overbuilding, which is more and more apt to happen.


Considering past tax rebates, or credits, to take full advantage would
require that you are way in the black. This would help newer WISP
somewhat, but most are in the red from the beginning. It would definitely
help sustained WISP's that have been at it for a few years.

Scottie

 --
 /*
 Jason Philbrook   |   Midcoast Internet Solutions - Wireless and DSL
 KB1IOJ|   Broadband Internet Access, Dialup, and Hosting
  http://f64.nu/   |   for Midcoast Mainehttp://www.midcoast.com/
 */


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread Chuck Hogg
1.  While I don't disagree with most of what you are saying, show me the day 
that a UBNT product can have 160+ clients connected to it with sub 10ms ping 
times to them all.  One single AP, passing 7mb aggregate of traffic.  I've had 
Trango, Canopy, and a huge pusher of MikroTik (same proto as UBNT).  Canopy by 
far beats them in scale, there is no question about it.  Most non-Canopy people 
don't want to hear it, but I started drinking the Moto Kool Aid about a year 
ago.  My support calls of customers on Trango vs Canopy vs Mikro/UBNT is 
astounding.  For every 50 service calls, about 8 of them are for Canopy 
customers, where the installer did not properly use the correct size antenna or 
alignment was off.  The others are Mikro/UBNT problems from interference or 
other issues.  The Trango is calls because the capacity sucks.

2. Range wise, we have Moto clients 18 miles out.  MikroTik/UBNT, we had them 
at 22 miles out.  Those are extremes for us, so I don't see how range is an 
issue...unless you are working with 15+ mile customers for the 
majority...again, most of us are not.  Antenna wise, there are available 
products from LMG to max out the EIRP.

Anyone can do those shields for any type of antenna...regardless of UBNT or 
Canopy.

The problem is, yes you can get 40 customers on an AP...split it up into 
sectors and get maybe 120.  Do the same on Canopy, and it's 600+ clients per 
site.  So, if you are looking to only do 120 (with perfect 0 interference from 
outside sources, which is highly unlikely in his urban market)...it scales.  If 
you want more...you get the picture.

Regards,
Chuck Hogg
Shelby Broadband
502-722-9292
ch...@shelbybb.com
http://www.shelbybb.com


-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf 
Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 10:25 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

I am not disagreeing with the advantages of Canopy. No doubt Canopy is a 
quality carrier grade type system.

BUT, to be fair There are other factors to consider..

1) Syncing can be effective for spectrum reuse, and extremely useful. But, it 
can become less effective and sometimes can still be subject to 
self-interference as the nework grows, such as when the sub's distince away 
from towers varies drastically between sectors.  The reason us that sectors can 
hear CPEs behinds it in some capacity, not just teh CPEs in front of it. 
For example, IF sector 1 has a sub at half mile, and Sector2 has sub at 10 
miles. Sector2 may hear sector1's sub louder than it hears its own subscriber 
10 miles away.  For syncing to work optimally without self interference, all 
the Client's signal levels at the AP ideally should be received at similar 
signal strenth, so that the Front to back ratios of sector antennas is enough 
to isolate the two sectors. Whether that is possible may depend on the 
frequency range you use, and what antennas are available to easilly deploy.  
With Canopy C/I spec of 3db helps a lot, but the plastic case lets more noise 
reach the unit.  We ran into this when comparingto Trango. trango only had 
about 7db C/I, but the thick metal case had muchbetter F?B than Canopy did, so 
it average out.

2)  Canopies have signficantly shorter range because by default config 
(integrated antenna models) they use APs and SUs with lower DB antennas and 
wider beamwidths, so not able to operate at peak EIRP. Also note that gain by 
antenna has a double effect. Meaning for an AP, it increases the receives from 
CPEs as well as the transmits to CPEs.  So a large penalty is taken if an AP 
has an lower DB antenna than competing products.

Canopy has many different models now, and antenna design is not the same with 
them all, so I dont mean to stereotype the product line.

In an Ubquiti AirMax solutions, they have optimally strong sector antenna 
options. And they have the flexibilty for a wide array of antenna choices for 
CPEs.
That flexibility can be useful, and it is affordable to achieve.  Saying that 
Ubiquiti wont be able to scale, and one day will need to be pulled out, is not 
necessarilly true.

There are enhancements to beef up Ubiquiti. For example, some jsut made a nice 
steel antenna shield, that adds a huge amount of Front to back ratio teh the 
Ubiquiti antenna.


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message -
From: Jerry Richardson jrichard...@aircloud.com
To: j284...@yahoo.com; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 9:12 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp


 if you are not going with moto, then the ubiquity airmax stuff would
 be as good a choice as any. you might get 20 business class subs per
 ap and you should be able to get 3 120deg sectors on the roof.  you
 will run into self interference problems at around 20 subs per AP.
 unfortunately you will already be committed to the ubiquity and there
 is no 

Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread Tom DeReggi
 Show me the day that a UBNT product can have 160+ clients connected to it 
 with sub 10ms ping times to them all.

I cant. Canopy wins that one, atleast in PtMP mode.
(Tenant building is different story, where we have a few CPEs to AP, but a 
lot of customers behind each CPE).
If a super cell site design is needed, thats where Canopy and Trango shine.

The Trango is calls because the capacity sucks.
I dont agree with that, considering Trango has more capacity (9mbps) than a 
non-advantage basic Canopy AP (7mb aggregate, but less each way when a fixed 
ratio in each direction is configured, required for syncing). Obviously, 
Advantage series Canopy has more capacity, if the shorter range that product 
requires is acceptable for the coverage footprint.

 2. Range wise, we have Moto clients 18 miles out.  MikroTik/UBNT, we had 
 them at 22 miles out.  Those are extremes for us, so I don't see how range 
 is an issue...unless you are working with 15+ mile customers for the 
 majority...again, most of us are not.  Antenna wise, there are available 
 products from LMG to max out the EIRP.

Again, I dont question that canopy scales better or the possibilty to get 18 
mile range. But that claim is a bit misleading.  We need to recognize noise 
floor and rain factor are also factors, that restrict range to less than the 
theoretical or ideal case range. Maybe in 2.4G or 900M 18 mile is typical, 
but not in 5.8 or 5.3.
Lets use a link budget calculator and do the math...

Trango 5.8Ghz AP... tx 22, ant 14, CPE 22tx, ant 25.@ 12 miles  = -72 rssi. 
leaves 10db of fade margin, since sensitivity is -82 or so.
Canopy specs are pretty close to Trango, but not sure exactly what they are, 
so guessing here...
For Canopy 5.8Ap lets assume all the same specs, except the AP antenna only 
has an 8dbi int antenna. The maths says -78 rssi, and only 4.5db fade 
margin.
Lets see what happens when we try to get 10db of fade margin equivellent to 
Trango, meaning -72 rssi the results are 6 miles.  Exactly 1/2 the range 
of the Trango, with same size customer premise antenna.  But do you really 
want to use a dish at customer sites? Lets do the math for 18 miles, and the 
Canopy will yield -82 rssi. Does one really want to operate a link without 
any fade margin? The problem gets worse with Canopy 5.3, at low power, where 
antenna gain is absolutely needed to get distance. A 14bi at AP and 15 SU 
will just barely get 2 miles with 10db of fade. 8db Canopy AP with Behive on 
CPE (at legal power limits)  gets you 1 mile with same fade margin at the AP 
side.  8dbi antenna is a handicap.  (again math may not be exact, if canopy 
has better sensitivity than written).

I recognize a Canopy AP could use an external antenna, to make up for it. 
But there is an extra cost for that. Or a Beehive to up the CPE gain, but 
again a cost for that.

I also recognize we were originally talking about comparing Ubiquiti to 
Canopy, (not trango). But the same principles apply. Sure a Canopy DSSS 
system will have more range than an OFDM one requiring higher modulation and 
worse sensitivity. But more comparable Advantage series also has half the 
range of a regular Canopy to keep this conversation fair. But again, with 
Ubiquiti I can get an AP operating at full EIRP by default, and have options 
for non-dish CPE units of higher gain than 8dbi.

If someone looks at Canopy, I highly recommend that they consider higher 
gain AP antenna options.


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 11:34 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp


 1.  While I don't disagree with most of what you are saying, show me the 
 day that a UBNT product can have 160+ clients connected to it with sub 
 10ms ping times to them all.  One single AP, passing 7mb aggregate of 
 traffic.  I've had Trango, Canopy, and a huge pusher of MikroTik (same 
 proto as UBNT).  Canopy by far beats them in scale, there is no question 
 about it.  Most non-Canopy people don't want to hear it, but I started 
 drinking the Moto Kool Aid about a year ago.  My support calls of 
 customers on Trango vs Canopy vs Mikro/UBNT is astounding.  For every 50 
 service calls, about 8 of them are for Canopy customers, where the 
 installer did not properly use the correct size antenna or alignment was 
 off.  The others are Mikro/UBNT problems from interference or other 
 issues.  The Trango is calls because the capacity sucks.

 2. Range wise, we have Moto clients 18 miles out.  MikroTik/UBNT, we had 
 them at 22 miles out.  Those are extremes for us, so I don't see how range 
 is an issue...unless you are working with 15+ mile customers for the 
 majority...again, most of us are not.  Antenna wise, there are available 
 products from LMG to max out the EIRP.

 Anyone can do those shields for any type of antenna...regardless of UBNT 
 

Re: [WISPA] How the FCC Proposes the Regulate Broadband

2010-05-27 Thread MDK
Please note that I said refundable tax credits.   That is, if your credits 
are more than your taxes, you get a check back.

This could be done so that your refunds would be quarterly.






++
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
541-969-8200  509-386-4589
++

--
From: Scottie Arnett sarn...@info-ed.com
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 8:24 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] How the FCC Proposes the Regulate Broadband


 Considering past tax rebates, or credits, to take full advantage would
 require that you are way in the black. This would help newer WISP
 somewhat, but most are in the red from the beginning. It would definitely
 help sustained WISP's that have been at it for a few years.

 Scottie

 --
 /*
 Jason Philbrook   |   Midcoast Internet Solutions - Wireless and DSL
 KB1IOJ|   Broadband Internet Access, Dialup, and Hosting
  http://f64.nu/   |   for Midcoast Mainehttp://www.midcoast.com/
 */


 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





 
 WISPA Wants You! Join today!
 http://signup.wispa.org/
 

 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 




WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] How the FCC Proposes the Regulate Broadband

2010-05-27 Thread MDK
Tom, I've always assumed that the debate on this topic is going to be out of 
public view.

What I've said is not news to anyone, it's not any secret and being proposed 
to WISPA publicly will change nothing, influence nothing, in terms of how 
anyone else chooses strategy or positions.

I hope it's well debated.   I hope you eventually reach a point where your 
policy stands at WISPA are publicly advocated and clear.

I'm waiting.




++
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
541-969-8200  509-386-4589
++

--
From: Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net
Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 6:58 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] How the FCC Proposes the Regulate Broadband

 MDK,

 I applaud your Email.  It will take some time to fully digest all the
 relevent points that were addressed.
 I dont agree with everything that you suggested, but I do agree with a
 signfiicant part of it.
 One realization that you brought up which I agree with is regarding that 
 we
 will reach a time where a line will need to be drawn in the sand, and 
 we'll
 need to know which side of the line we are going to be standing on. On 
 some
 of these topics, playing both sides simply isn't going to be possible.

 I have a couple quick comments

 1) Anything posted on the general list will be google indexed for the 
 world
 to see. Including the apposing side.
 In my opinion, it is not wise to debate WISPA's strategy to combat these
 important issue, in that environment.
 For that reason, I have been disccussing NBP and TItleII reclassification
 topics on the member list which is only available to wispa members to 
 read.
 Its also important that WISPA represent's WISPA member. When debating on 
 an
 open list, its really hard for me to decipher which comments are comming
 from members and which are not. For example, a Verizon lobbiest could be
 masking themselves as a WISP, and I'd never know.
 I'd also like to re-engage legislative committee list, to start 
 formulating
 a plan, so members list does not get saturated with policy posts. I 
 welcome
 members to join legislative committe who are interested in debating this.
 The more members that join the committee, the bigger the change the
 conclusion will be a reflection of member's opinion.

 2) I think much debate is needed regarding strategy for these important
 topics. I think its to early to ask members to vote on what our stance
 should be. Because there has been little debate to challenge potential
 stances, and many members may not yet be fully versed with all the facts, 
 so
 some may make an uninformed decission, that could have results different
 than what they expected by taking their stance.

 3) Stategy is needed. Its easy to come up with what we want. The hard part
 is to justify and convince policy makers to give us that. And what we want
 may not be realistic to achieve. This is serious business, we dont want to
 pick a stance that will leave us with nothing at all at the end, because 
 we
 didn;t face realitiy. We cant forget that FCC and Congress also already 
 have
 an idea of what they want.   There are many complicated issues here. Its 
 not
 that I dont want to poll members, I am very interested in what they have 
 to
 say and think. But there is also a huge advantage to creating a think tank
 environment first, challenged by council, and to share results with
 memebrship for them to consider before deciding their position..

 For example, Congress and FCC have an obligation to help consumers, and
 consumers want their broadband options improved. To help, money is needed.
 USF has been identified as a money source, by the FCC and Congress. Its 
 very
 unlikely they'll vote to wipe out a money source that actively regenerates
 funds. Its so much more likely they'll try to repurpose those funds, to
 solve a problem. Sure we can fight to shutdown USF, many of us would 
 prefer
 that, but the flip side is if USF is not shut down, and we do not lobby 
 for
 how to best repurpose it, it will be guaranteed that fund will go to or
 competitors in mass proportions, and we will get harmed by that, I'd argue
 possibly even extinguished by that.  Another example was BTOP Round2. In
 Round2, much funds will go for inter- networking government locations. In
 one sense its an outrage that huge amounts of money will go to build
 networks that may not be needed, and take revenue away from the price 
 sector
 providers. And few WISPs will see a dime of it. But on the flip side it 
 was
 possibly a victory. What it also meant was that WISP's last mile networks
 will be less likely to get overbuilt. Last mile monoploies will be less
 likely to get created. And the most Rural areas were targeted, so less
 chance of a WISP's prime subscriber base market being over built. OR for
 example, many can argue money was most needed for Last mile, but lobbying
 

Re: [WISPA] Becoming a Wisp

2010-05-27 Thread Butch Evans
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 18:12 -0400, Jerry Richardson wrote: 
 Your Moto bias will cost you.

Here we go againthis is not NECESSARILY true.  Let's not start this
whole thread again...ok?

-- 

* Butch Evans   * Professional Network Consultation*
* http://www.butchevans.com/* Network Engineering  *
* http://store.wispgear.net/* Wired or Wireless Networks   *
* http://blog.butchevans.com/   * ImageStream, Mikrotik and MORE!  *





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/