a" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 11:06 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 445
Ideas about how to fill out the form if you don't know how you would
comply yet? Does anyone know if this is a required field? Can you just put
"no
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, John Scrivner wrote:
Let me ask a stupid question. Why is it not the FEDS job to
translate data as they see fit? George, please ask that question
when you see the FBI. This one is very important to me. I am also
copying our attorney, Kris Twomey, on this particular issue.
his a personal
decision ?
Sorry to stick a thorn in here, but, I think Mark's questions are
valid
and should be asked on behalf of WISPA.
JohnnyO
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George Rogato
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 11:44
General List
Subject: Re: CALEA - HOW? RE: [WISPA] Form 445
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, Rick Smith wrote:
OK, Don't point me to some confusing URL I don't have time (or
patience) to read about how to comply with CALEA.
The most difficult thing about the CALEA compliance issue i
hnnyO
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 12:46 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 445
Mark said:
>So, you think the big guys aren't going to lobby for things that
benefit
Butch,
Here's a decient paper based on the european version of calea.
http://www.aqsacomna.com/us/articles/LIIPWhitePaperv21.pdf
Ed
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:33:55 -0600 (CST)
Butch Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SO..for a WISPA built "mediation box", you could simply put together
> a Linux s
D] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 2:02 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: CALEA - HOW? RE: [WISPA] Form 445
What can you tell us about the "mediation box"? Is this something we can
build a few of as WISPA and send to members who ne
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, John Scrivner wrote:
What can you tell us about the "mediation box"? Is this something
we can build a few of as WISPA and send to members who need it?
Well, we are all in the land of unknown right now. The format of
the data is yet to be determined. Let's make a supposi
ing"
Zing LLC
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 2:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Form 445
If you are a paid WISPA Principal Member then you
I'm sure this branch of the thread has already been killed, but I
haven't read that far yet :)
wispa wrote:
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:04:37 -0800, George Rogato wrote
I predict the little guy will end up giving all his subs publics and
passing the ball to their upstreams, and probably-most li
EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Butch Evans
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 3:40 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Form 445
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, wispa wrote:
Uhmm, Butch... No, they're not "asking for a means". They're
insisting that we build the tap into
- HOW? RE: [WISPA] Form 445
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, Rick Smith wrote:
OK, Don't point me to some confusing URL I don't have time (or
patience) to read about how to comply with CALEA.
The most difficult thing about the CALEA compliance issue is that the format
of the data has not,
us to go broke funding it, and let "them" pull it any
time they want...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Butch Evans
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 3:40 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Form 445
On Tue, 13 Feb
Mark said:
So, you think the big guys aren't going to lobby for things that benefit
them, while we have no voice or consideration because don't have billions to
lobby with?
We have people going to D.C. to meet with the FBI directly to help get
this all worked out. How much more representa
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, John Scrivner wrote:
Question 1. If WISPA develops an industry standard which meets all
the technical and legal requirements of the law, will law
enforcement accept our data stream from whatever standard we
develop?
In addition to this, how about adding the idea of bandw
Question 1. If WISPA develops an industry standard which meets all the
technical and legal requirements of the law, will law enforcement accept
our data stream from whatever standard we develop?
Question 2. Will your office allow us to have a system or process
certified as being "CALEA Complia
Looks like these platforms are supported:
1-pre2
1-pre3
7200
7301
as5350
as5350xm
as5400
as5400hpx
as5400xm
as5850-ersc
as5850-rsc
--
Dylan Oliver
Primaverity, LLC
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archive
55
541-998-5599 fax
- Original Message -
From: "wispa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 9:32 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Form 445
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 23:22:12 -0600, JohnnyO wrote
>
> I'm not a pessimist
tt Liotta
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 10:00 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: CALEA - HOW? RE: [WISPA] Form 445
We are just deploying a new IOS image that includes Cisco's SII
architecture. Our only cost is time.
-Matt
Rick Smith wrote:
OK, Don't point me to some confusi
63-0989
Direct: (260) 827-2486
Fax:(260) 824-9624
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oibw.net
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 10:00 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: CALEA - HOW? RE: [WISPA] Fo
OK folks - Most of you are in rural areas where you are the only
choice for broadband. You need to advise your subscribers and your
congressional representatives of the hardship this will cause. Perhaps
if they lose votes, they will help.
-RickG
On 2/13/07, Dave Brenton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ndition.
Sincerely,
Mac Dearman
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of wispa
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 10:52 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Form 445
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 23:46:13 -0500, Rick Smith wrote
> I think I'm
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George Rogato
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 11:44 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 445
wispa wrote:
You actually think that the "big guys" will actually let that happen?
Yeah, I can see it now, our upstreams turning CALEA
rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George Rogato
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 12:44 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 445
wispa wrote:
You actually think that the "big guys" will actually let that happen?
Yeah, I can see it now
"Include me in WISPA 445 Filing"
I Guess. I Mean we are not yet operational
so there is nothing to monitor as of this
date.
So including us in may be the INCORRECT
move at this time.
it's RTWB, LLC
dba Rural Tennessee Wireless Broadband
Dave Brenton
General Manager
Rural Tennessee Wireless Br
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Butch Evans
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 2:28 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: CALEA - HOW? RE: [WISPA] Form 445
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, Rick Smith wrote:
>OK, Don't point me to some confusing URL I don't have time (or
>patience) to read about how to c
2007 2:41 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Form 445
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, wispa wrote:
>This is the FCC declaring that EVERY MEANS OF COMMUNICATION BE
>PRE-TAPPED at the expense of industry.
WHAT? You are not correct. This is the LEA asking for a means to collect
data on sus
Mark,
What is amazing is how you think that your per cent of the marketplace
is so significant that both the FCC and the BOC have set their sites on you.
Having spent 7 years in telecom dealing mainly with BellSouth but many
other carriers as well, I would like to let you know that you are no
Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Butch Evans
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 3:40 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Form 445
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, wispa wrote:
>Uhmm, Butch... No, they're not "asking for a means&q
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 02:40:07 -0600 (CST), Butch Evans wrote
> On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, wispa wrote:
>
> >Uhmm, Butch... No, they're not "asking for a means". They're
> >insisting that we build the tap into our network, at our expense,
> >prior to a request ( whether we got any requests or not ), t
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, wispa wrote:
Uhmm, Butch... No, they're not "asking for a means". They're
insisting that we build the tap into our network, at our expense,
prior to a request ( whether we got any requests or not ), to
provide them data in a specific form.
And what form is that data go
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 01:40:41 -0600 (CST), Butch Evans wrote
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, wispa wrote:
>
> >This is the FCC declaring that EVERY MEANS OF COMMUNICATION BE
> >PRE-TAPPED at the expense of industry.
>
> WHAT? You are not correct. This is the LEA asking for a means to
> collect data on
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, wispa wrote:
This is the FCC declaring that EVERY MEANS OF COMMUNICATION BE
PRE-TAPPED at the expense of industry.
WHAT? You are not correct. This is the LEA asking for a means to
collect data on suspected criminals. They will have to have a
subpoena to gather the dat
WISPA.
JohnnyO
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George Rogato
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 11:44 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 445
wispa wrote:
You actually think that the "big guys" will actually let t
OTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 1:17 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 445
Rick,
I've been talking with both the FCC and FBI. It's up in the air yet, but it
looks like calea compliance won't be that big of a deal. We'
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, Rick Smith wrote:
OK, Don't point me to some confusing URL I don't have time (or
patience) to read about how to comply with CALEA.
The most difficult thing about the CALEA compliance issue is that
the format of the data has not, yet, been finalized. This makes it
imposs
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Mac Dearman wrote:
The patient has at least one of the following that is not a
culturally sanctioned response:
1. Delusions
2. Hallucinations
3. Speech that is markedly disorganized
4. Behavior that is markedly disorganized or catatonic.
Mac! I didn't know you were a s
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 01:03:27 -0600, Joe Laura wrote
> My only question is if we do not know for sure exactly what we need
> to be compliant by 5/14/07 is it smart to sign on the dotted line
> saying we will be compliant? Am I missing something?
The part that gets me... You have to state that you
CTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George Rogato
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 11:44 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 445
wispa wrote:
You actually think that the "big guys" will actually let that happen?
Yeah, I can see it now, our upstreams turnin
My only question is if we do not know for sure exactly what we need to be
compliant by 5/14/07 is it smart to sign on the dotted line saying we will
be compliant? Am I missing something?
Superior Wireless
New Orleans,La.
www.superior1.com
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Un
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:44:20 -0800, George Rogato wrote
> wispa wrote:
>
> > You actually think that the "big guys" will actually let that happen?
>
> Yeah, I can see it now, our upstreams turning CALEA compliance into
> a profit center.
>
> Anyways if you want to bring your own tape recorder
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 23:55:19 -0600, Mac Dearman wrote
> It's going to be to easy Rick. If everyone will hold their horses
> and just "trot" for a short time they will get everything lined out.
> The ability to stream live data is already in place here and it's
> cheap. I don't know why it wouldn
D] On
Behalf Of George Rogato
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 11:44 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 445
wispa wrote:
> You actually think that the "big guys" will actually let that happen?
Yeah, I can see it now, our upstreams turning CALEA compliance into a
pr
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:49:52 -0500, Rick Smith wrote
> OK, Don't point me to some confusing URL I don't have time
> (or patience) to read about how to comply with CALEA.
>
> How would you provide the "hook" in so the FBI could just
> listen in at any time (is that the way it works ? Or do
> th
..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 1:17 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 445
Rick,
I've been talking with both the FCC and FBI. It's up in the air yet, but it
l
rom: "Rick Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 9:44 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Form 445
Ya know Mac, not funny, at the same time, funny.
I think Mark's got a point, albeit dooms-day-ish.
T
t: Monday, February 12, 2007 9:44 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 445
wispa wrote:
You actually think that the "big guys" will actually let that happen?
Yeah, I can see it now, our upstreams turning CALEA compliance into a
profit center.
Anyways if you want to bring your own tap
2007 2:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Form 445
If you are a paid WISPA Principal Member then you do not have to worry
about filing your CALEA Form 445. Kris Twomey is handling it for all
paid WISPA Principal Members who want it done for them. They are
allo
Rick Smith
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 11:45 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Form 445
Ya know Mac, not funny, at the same time, funny.
I think Mark's got a point, albeit dooms-day-ish.
There's no fiscal or physical way small WISPs can comply
with CALEA,
List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 445
wispa wrote:
> You actually think that the "big guys" will actually let that happen?
Yeah, I can see it now, our upstreams turning CALEA compliance into a
profit center.
Anyways if you want to bring your own tape recorder up to the feds and
as
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mac Dearman
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 12:37 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Form 445
Patients who experience an acute psychotic episode lasting longer than one
day but less than one month and that may or may not i
wispa wrote:
You actually think that the "big guys" will actually let that happen?
Yeah, I can see it now, our upstreams turning CALEA compliance into a
profit center.
Anyways if you want to bring your own tape recorder up to the feds and
ask them some questions, go for it.
But the of
On
Behalf Of wispa
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 10:52 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Form 445
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 23:46:13 -0500, Rick Smith wrote
> I think I'm going to be the first to say this, but
> I don't have time to give a crap about calea. I'm
&g
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 23:22:12 -0600, JohnnyO wrote
I'm not a pessimist at all. I just know what federal regulation means. It
means WE GO AWAY.
Federal regulation is the DEATH of small business. I have no doubt the
Telcos and Cablecos are no doubt celebrating big time. What they could not
d
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:04:37 -0800, George Rogato wrote
> I predict the little guy will end up giving all his subs publics and
> passing the ball to their upstreams, and probably-most likely for a
> price. I find it hard to believe this is not going to be an option.
You actually think that the
Doom and Gloom eh Mark ? Damn man - the big pessimist (sp?)
JohnnyO
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of wispa
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 10:52 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Form 445
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 23:46:13 -0500
I predict the little guy will end up giving all his subs publics and
passing the ball to their upstreams, and probably-most likely for a
price. I find it hard to believe this is not going to be an option.
We'll find out more Thursday when we meet at the Hoover Building in DC
to talk to the FB
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 23:46:13 -0500, Rick Smith wrote
> I think I'm going to be the first to say this, but
> I don't have time to give a crap about calea. I'm
> taking advantage of an industry organization to do
> something on my behalf, because I can't have the
> time to give a crap later when t
9:36 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 445
On 2/12/07, John Scrivner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kris Twomey has told me he can do this and that it will meet the
> requirements for filing. It is not a terribly difficult thing to do but
> it is just easy to use an
, February 12, 2007 5:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Form 445
If you are a paid WISPA Principal Member then you do not have to worry
about filing your CALEA Form 445. Kris Twomey is handling it for all
paid WISPA Principal Members who want it done for them. They are
On 2/12/07, John Scrivner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kris Twomey has told me he can do this and that it will meet the
requirements for filing. It is not a terribly difficult thing to do but
it is just easy to use an attorney for anything like this. I do not
bother trying to meet every legal filin
Erik - are you a paid member of WISPA ?
JohnnyO
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Eric Merkel
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 5:47 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 445
On 2/12/07, John Scrivner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
rg
Subject: [WISPA] Form 445
If you are a paid WISPA Principal Member then you do not have to worry
about filing your CALEA Form 445. Kris Twomey is handling it for all
paid WISPA Principal Members who want it done for them. They are
allowing later filing now. Kris will be filing on behalf of all
Kris Twomey has told me he can do this and that it will meet the
requirements for filing. It is not a terribly difficult thing to do but
it is just easy to use an attorney for anything like this. I do not
bother trying to meet every legal filing requirement. I consider that my
attorney's job an
] Form 445
> Kris Twomey says he can handle our filing on behalf of all WISPA
> members and that he can do it with just a company name for now. He
> will file for all of WISPA operators who wish and include company
> names of those who want to be included. No names will be included
John.
Include CV-Access, Inc.
Thanks,
Tim Kerns
- Original Message -
From: "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 1:25 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 445
Kris Twomey says he can handle our filing on b
"Include me in WISPA 445 Filing" Washington Broadband, Inc.
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.411 / Virus Database: 268.17.37/682 - Release Date: 2/12/2007
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wisp
On 2/12/07, John Scrivner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you are a paid WISPA Principal Member then you do not have to worry
about filing your CALEA Form 445. Kris Twomey is handling it for all
paid WISPA Principal Members who want it done for them. They are
allowing later filing now. Kris will be
"Include me in WISPA 445 Filing"
Zing LLC
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 2:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Form 445
If you are a
Boy...if that's not a valuable service justifying my dues.
- Cliff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 2:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Form 445
If you
Just paid up... include RTPS Networks, Inc. d/b/a Near You Networks
THANKS! AWESOME IDEA!
R
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 4:25 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Form 445
Ok I paid up
Please include us in CALEA filing
Intelliwave, LLC
Thanks
Chris Cooper
Intelliwave, LLC
740.592.0322
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Form 445
If you are a paid WISPA Principal Member then you do not have to worry
about filing your CALEA Form 445. Kris Twomey is handling it for all
paid WISPA Principal Members who want it done for them. They are
allowing later filing now. Kris will be filing on behalf
No problem. Kris says there is no penalty for this.
Scriv
cw wrote:
No, thank you. I've already wasted most of the day completing the
forms but our post office run for the day is already gone. So, I was
wondering if our forms could be post marked Tuesday instead of Monday.
- cw
John Scrivn
John please include us, COLI Inc.
Bill Gaylord
COLI Inc
John Scrivner wrote:
If you are a paid WISPA Principal Member then you do not have to worry
about filing your CALEA Form 445. Kris Twomey is handling it for all
paid WISPA Principal Members who want it done for them. They are
allowing la
"Include me in WISPA 445 Filing"
APGWireless, LLC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Scrivner
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 2:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Form 445
If you are a
No, thank you. I've already wasted most of the day completing the forms but
our post office run for the day is already gone. So, I was wondering if our
forms could be post marked Tuesday instead of Monday. - cw
John Scrivner wrote:
Kris Twomey says he can handle our filing on behalf of all WISP
Kris Twomey says he can handle our filing on behalf of all WISPA members
and that he can do it with just a company name for now. He will file for
all of WISPA operators who wish and include company names of those who
want to be included. No names will be included who have already filed
themselves
You would have to take it up with Kris. He knows this stuff better than
me. That is why I pay him to handle my FCC legal work. I would have made
the offer sooner had we been in touch sooner. Kris and I have been very
out of touch with our schedules lately. I am moving my office and Kris
has bee
Kris Twomey says he can handle our filing on behalf of all WISPA members
and that he can do it with just a company name for now. He will file for
all of WISPA operators who wish and include company names of those who
want to be included. No names will be included who have already filed
themselv
Wish you guys had made this offer sooner. We are Part-15.org and
WISPA member and have already gone the Part-15 route.
What is Kris putting in Form 445 though? Just wander how it differs
from Part-15's?
Matt
If you are a paid WISPA Principal Member then you do not have to worry
about filing
This is wonderful but you would need our FRN. Are you saying we don't have
to have this postmarked today?
John Scrivner wrote:
If you are a paid WISPA Principal Member then you do not have to worry
about filing your CALEA Form 445. Kris Twomey is handling it for all
paid WISPA Principal Member
Please include me in the WISPA 445 filing Rabbit Meadows Technology, LLC
On 2/12/07, John Scrivner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you are a paid WISPA Principal Member then you do not have to worry
about filing your CALEA Form 445. Kris Twomey is handling it for all
paid WISPA Principal Mem
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 12:44 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Form 445
> If you are a paid WISPA Principal Member then you do not have to worry
> about filing your CALEA Form 445. Kris Twomey is handling it for all
> paid WISPA Principal Members who want it done f
If you are a paid WISPA Principal Member then you do not have to worry
about filing your CALEA Form 445. Kris Twomey is handling it for all
paid WISPA Principal Members who want it done for them. They are
allowing later filing now. Kris will be filing on behalf of all paid
WISPA Principal Membe
85 matches
Mail list logo
