I don't think so :)
> And the only one on this list out of the States? Is that right?
--
Ing. Paolo Di Francesco
Teleinform S.p.A.
Sede Legale: Via Francesco Paolo Di Blasi 1, 90144 Palermo
Unita' Operativa: Via Regione Siciliana 49, 90046 Monreale (Palermo)
Tel: +39-091-6408576, +39-091-6
red, and what was
> once a profitable business is now bleeding red ink and needs to reach
> 2,000 customers before things get good again
>
> Which creates an interesting question -- if you're such a WISP, do you
> just stop and sit tight at 700 customers? Or do you "
nd what an organization needs to support itself
>>> (e.g., it
>>> doesn't scale linearly)
>>>>
>>>> The picture looks more like this
>>>>
>>>> 700 customers -- one-man band (or equivalent) -- highly profitable
>>>>
>>>>
t;> Unfortunately, there's a minimum amount of overhead required, and
>>> what
>> was once a profitable business is now bleeding red ink and needs to
>> reach
>> 2,000 customers before things get good again
>>>
>>> Which creates an interestin
- if you're such a WISP, do you
> just stop and sit tight at 700 customers? Or do you "go-for-broke" by trying
> to grow?
> >
> > -Charles
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wis
harles
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of jp
> Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 10:36 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
>
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 05:28:49PM
Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of jp
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 10:36 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 05:28:49PM -0600, Wallace Walcher wrote:
> Having built my WISP from scratch wit
On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 05:28:49PM -0600, Wallace Walcher wrote:
> Having built my WISP from scratch with my own resources and currently being
> debt free in my operations, I often wonder who the people are who so quickly
> classify Mikrotik and Ubiquity gear as trash. I am making a very good
> li
Having built my WISP from scratch with my own resources and currently being
debt free in my operations, I often wonder who the people are who so quickly
classify Mikrotik and Ubiquity gear as trash. I am making a very good
living deploying such "trash".
My perception is they are either people who
Comments inline below:
>I find these comparisons of products like Ubiquiti / Mikrotik vs. Motorola
>/ WiMAX products to be somewhat unrealistic -- it seems to me that it's
>like comparing something that's hypothetical and "looks good on paper" and
>"hoping" that it will actually work
I don't
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Michael Baird
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 1:23 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax
ax. It slows the overall
>>> performance to much less than 150+ Mbps, but it might get to the
>>> 100/user per-AP scale. 3 or 6 months from now we will know of either
>>> large deployments or #ubntfail stories.
>>>
>>>
>>> Rubens
>>>
performance to much less than 150+ Mbps, but it might get to the
>> 100/user per-AP scale. 3 or 6 months from now we will know of either
>> large deployments or #ubntfail stories.
>>
>>
>> Rubens
>>
>>
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From:
ubntfail stories.
>
>
> Rubens
>
>
> -- Forwarded message ------
> From: Charles Wu
> Date: Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 2:33 AM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
> To: WISPA General List
>
>
>
> Let's go back to the original thread -- we wer
t;> large deployments or #ubntfail stories.
>>
>>
>> Rubens
>>
>>
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: Charles Wu
>> Date: Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 2:33 AM
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
>> To: WISPA General List
>>
--- Forwarded message ------
> From: Charles Wu
> Date: Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 2:33 AM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
> To: WISPA General List
>
>
>
> Let's go back to the original thread -- we were talking about how
> Ubiquiti was "changing the game"
ns
>
>
> -- Forwarded message ------
> From: Charles Wu
> Date: Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 2:33 AM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
> To: WISPA General List
>
>
>
> Let's go back to the original thread -- we were talking about how
> Ubiquiti w
Many of those licenses had serious restrictions, which is why the auction
reverse was so low in the first place.
-Matt
On Dec 31, 2009, at 1:24 AM, Charles Wu wrote:
> Speaking of which, did anyone notice the results of the latest BRS Auction
> (#86)
>
> Licenses went for an average of $0.03
Speaking of which, did anyone notice the results of the latest BRS Auction (#86)
Licenses went for an average of $0.03 / MHz POP
That means if 60 MHz covering 100,000 people (as defined by Census 2000
numbers) would have gone for $180k -- with the small business 35% credit - that
means a WISP w
x 232
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Charles Wu
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 11:34 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
>We have successfuly used ubiquiti nano and power stations as injection
>We have successfuly used ubiquiti nano and power stations as injection
>radios for numerous tripod and cisco mesh systems. No problems. Of
>course I have used canopy for it too- no real difference in the end
>performance.
But there's a huge difference between "using a few here and there" a
Here we go again.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Ralph
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 5:15 PM
To: e...@wisp-router.com; WISPA General List
Cc: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Go ahead and
Sorry. Dumb iPhone auto correction changed Tropos to tripod. Lol
On Dec 30, 2009, at 8:05 PM, Ralph wrote:
> We have successfuly used ubiquiti nano and power stations as injection
> radios for numerous tripod and cisco mesh systems. No problems. Of
> course I have used canopy for it too- no re
;> From: Ralph
>> Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 20:05:50
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Cc: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
>>
>> We have successfuly used ubiquiti nano and power stations as
>> injection
>> radios for numerous
27;t understand the rules or
> checked the approved certs or is just spreading FUD.
>
> /Eje
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ralph
> Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 20:05:50
> To: WISPA General List
> Cc: WISPA General List
> Sub
st
Cc: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
We have successfuly used ubiquiti nano and power stations as injection
radios for numerous tripod and cisco mesh systems. No problems. Of
course I have used canopy for it too- no real difference in the end
performance.
Would not use Mik
We have successfuly used ubiquiti nano and power stations as injection
radios for numerous tripod and cisco mesh systems. No problems. Of
course I have used canopy for it too- no real difference in the end
performance.
Would not use Mikrotik for any RF due to our desire to stay legal.
On D
I find these comparisons of products like Ubiquiti / Mikrotik vs. Motorola /
WiMAX products to be somewhat unrealistic -- it seems to me that it's like
comparing something that's hypothetical and "looks good on paper" and "hoping"
that it will actually work
Here's my question; sure, on paper, t
Blake Covarrubias
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 11:56 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
> I'd say the question boils down to who's going to foot the bill for the
deployment -- you or the government =)
With or without government stimulus I'm curious of
works
> 813.426.4230 mobile
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Gino Villarini
> Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 7:25 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
>
> Funny
>
>
no worries.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Patrick Leary
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 1:57 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Hey, we are all winding down from a long year...
Patrick
;
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 2:47 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
> For that i have my Nissan Pathfinder
>
> Sent from my Motorola Startac...
>
>
> On Dec 30, 2009, at 5:35 PM, "Patrick Leary"
> wrote:
>
>> Personally, I prefer my 4-door Wrangler with
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Are we still talking about WiMax?
Me thinks this thread hath strayed.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Patrick Leary
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 1:47 PM
To: WISPA General List
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
A Porsche Cayenne could probably handle it, plus do about 140mph.
I almost got a used one last spring, but my wife vetoed it. Had a lot
of fun on the take it home overnight test drive though. :^)
I'm personally going to wait for the BWM X6s to
Are we still talking about WiMax?
Me thinks this thread hath strayed.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Patrick Leary
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 1:47 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
> On
> Behalf Of Gino Villarini
> Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 7:25 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
>
> Funny
>
> But I would say Im very satisfied with my curren
-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Matt Larsen - Lists
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 1:42 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
A Porsche Cayenne could probably handle it, plus do about 140mph.
I almost got a used one last spring, but my wife veto
ybe an old Freewave
>> 900 MHz hopper?
>>
>>
>> Patrick Leary
>> Aperto Networks
>> 813.426.4230 mobile
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>> Behalf Of Gino Villarini
a.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Gino Villarini
> Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 7:25 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
>
> Funny
>
> But I would say Im very satisfied with my current BMW
>
> Gino A. Villar
hopper?
Patrick Leary
Aperto Networks
813.426.4230 mobile
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 7:25 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Funny
But I would
Bret Clark
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 8:31 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
I race Corvettes and would take one any day over a Porsche and while the
Porsche race drivers are pretty cool, I find most Porsche "off track" owners
to be rather snobbish...but
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 11:31 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
I race Corvettes and would take one any day over a Porsche and while the
Porsche race drivers are pretty cool, I find most Porsche "off track"
owners to be rather snobbish...but I not sur
Maybe one can outrun 802.16e?
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Bret Clark
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 10:31 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
I race Corvettes and would take one any day over a Porsche and while
ecember 29, 2009 7:33 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
I'd say it'd be more like comparing a Corvette with a Porsche... in the
right hands in many cases, a Corvette will beat the Porsche, but the Porsche
is 35x more expensive.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent
, 2009 11:04 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Sorry I saw this on CNN and it made me laugh
http://money.cnn.com/2009/12/30/autos/GM_Corvette_recall.cnnw/index.htm
Daniel White
3-dB Networks
http://www.3dbnetworks.com
dan...@3-db.net
-Original Message
Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 7:33 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
I'd say it'd be more like comparing a Corvette with a Porsche... in the
right hands in many cases, a Corvette will beat the Porsche, but the Porsche
is 35x more expensive.
and test).
Daniel White
3-dB Networks
http://www.3dbnetworks.com
dan...@3-db.net
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Blake Covarrubias
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 11:56 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Sounds like you gave a choice for the answer, if the government does, then you
have, twice. WIMAX equipment cost is the entry block. As broadband needs "keep"
growing, you'll see an increased number of smaller "wisp" cells using equipment
such as UBNT. That is until the government uses your mone
I don't see LTE being developed for other markets than cellcos
Don't expect a LTE system for EBS spectrum
Sent from my Motorola Startac...
On Dec 30, 2009, at 3:00 AM, "Blake Covarrubias"
wrote:
>> I'd say the question boils down to who's going to foot the bill for
>> the deployment -- y
> I'd say the question boils down to who's going to foot the bill for the
> deployment -- you or the government =)
With or without government stimulus I'm curious of the lists' general consensus
on whether or not WiMAX is worthwhile investment in this 'war' of LTE vs WiMAX.
Having Uncle Sam fo
>> LTE has already won and .16e will find only small, limited life and even
>> less
>> mass development.
>Do you see any point in small BRS/EBS (MMDS/ITFS) license holders deploying
>802.16e in these frequency bands?
Hi Blake,
I'd say the question boils down to who's going to foot the bill fo
;Gino Villarini"
> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 8:01 PM
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Cc: "WISPA General List"
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
>
>> Tom
>>
>> ROTFL
>>
>> You can't compare a ubiquiti to a motor
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Tom DeReggi wrote:
> I hate to sabatage this 3650 thread, but I cant help myself, when 802.16e is
> mentioned for PtMP
>
> 1) Ubiquiti Mimo AP - $89, capacity up to 150 mb, (or maybe 50mbps might be
> more fair, for avg 20 Mhz channel 2x pole).
Not available
ics-il.com
--
From: "Gino Villarini"
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 8:01 PM
To: "WISPA General List"
Cc: "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
> Tom
>
> ROTFL
>
> You can't compare a ubiquiti to a motorola 16e
>
> That
gt; 813.426.4230 mobile
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
> On
> Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 4:00 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
>
> I hate to
; IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "3-dB Networks"
> To: "'WISPA General List'"
> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 6:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
>
>
>> Everytime I see that pric
big splash in the market.
>
> Tom DeReggi
> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "3-dB Networks"
> To: "'WISPA General List'"
> Sent: Tuesday, December 29,
amp; Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Patrick Leary"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 7:13 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
> In our case, the numbers are about $20k for three sectors yielding an
uot;
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 6:39 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
> Everytime I see that pricing it makes me cringe... since I've seen Moto
> give
> pricing way before a product is actually set to release and its way off
&g
less, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "3-dB Networks"
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 6:39 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
> Everytime I see that pricing it makes me cringe... since I've s
: [WISPA] Wimax gear
I hate to sabatage this 3650 thread, but I cant help myself, when
802.16e is mentioned for PtMP
1) Ubiquiti Mimo AP - $89, capacity up to 150 mb, (or maybe 50mbps
might be more fair, for avg 20 Mhz channel 2x pole).
2) Mikroik AP MIMO- $400, capacity: same as Ubiquiti, but
Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Blake Covarrubias
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 3:47 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
> LTE has already won and .16e will find only small, limited life and
> even les
I hate to sabatage this 3650 thread, but I cant help myself, when 802.16e is
mentioned for PtMP
1) Ubiquiti Mimo AP - $89, capacity up to 150 mb, (or maybe 50mbps might be
more fair, for avg 20 Mhz channel 2x pole).
2) Mikroik AP MIMO- $400, capacity: same as Ubiquiti, but with Spectrum
A
> LTE has already won and .16e will find only small, limited life and even less
> mass development.
Do you see any point in small BRS/EBS (MMDS/ITFS) license holders deploying
802.16e in these frequency bands?
> Huwaei then (in my opinion)
> uses its capture of .16e customers as the Trojan Hor
d
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -
>> From: "Gino Villarini"
>> To: "WISPA General List"
>> Cc: "WISPA General List"
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 5:05 PM
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
>>
>>
al Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Gino Villarini
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 4:07 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Soon as in q1 or q2
IIRC
$350~ SM
$3500~ AP
Specs are in the website under 320 series
Se
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Gino Villarini"
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Cc: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 5:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
>
>
>> L
ggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Gino Villarini"
To: "WISPA General List"
Cc: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
> Less?
>
>
u, I personally will not pass judgement one way or the other on
this topic. What I will say is interesting new dynamics are being explored,
and we are "testing" technology.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -----
From: "
Less?
Moto is comming out with a 16e system with 4.5 bits per hz using mimo
Sent from my Motorola Startac...
On Dec 29, 2009, at 4:45 PM, "Patrick Leary"
wrote:
> Why is your basic criteria .16e with MIMO (or .16e at all)?
>
> All .16e gets you in 3.65 GHz is much more (30% more) latency, l
that
customer to LTE later.
Patrick Leary
Aperto Networks
813.426.4230 mobile
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Michael Baird
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 1:28 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Michael Baird wrote:
> Patrick,
>
> 16e is where the majority of the chipset development is at, and where
> companies such as Alcatel/Cisco/Motorola/Alvarion/Zyxel are focusing,
> and the new big deployments (Clearwire) are using 802.16e, and we want
> the ability
Patrick,
16e is where the majority of the chipset development is at, and where
companies such as Alcatel/Cisco/Motorola/Alvarion/Zyxel are focusing,
and the new big deployments (Clearwire) are using 802.16e, and we want
the ability to go to 802.16m when available. We also want to take
advantag
Is supporting 802.16e really needed ? If you are providing your own
CPEs, 802.16d, pre-WiMAX or Navini CDMA with beamforming could work
just fine costing much less.
I've tested Redline RedMAX self-install 16d unit and 16d base station
and would give it a try on the real environment you wanna cover
Why is your basic criteria .16e with MIMO (or .16e at all)?
All .16e gets you in 3.65 GHz is much more (30% more) latency, less
throughput per MHz, higher overhead and more cost. And you won't get any
hope for interoperability, indoor modems, USB dongles or PC cards, since
those are only applicabl
esday, December 29, 2009 11:53 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Patrick works for Aperto, they don't support beamshaping/mimo or
802.16e, my Alvarion and Navini gear with the non-mimo subscriber radio
(mimo on the tower) worked at a mile non-LOS. I appreciate the inp
That's what I had in my head typed it out wrong.
Do you have much foliage in the way? Was this all LOS driving around?
I would imagine once you get inside a house things changes drastically
coming from a truck.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy
Back seat of truck facing the roof, not truck bed.
Regards
Michael Baird
> Good information.
>
> Keep in mind customer self installs != radio in truck bed.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> "The secret to creativity is
: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Q3 is a better guess I think...
Travis
Microserv
Gino Villarini wrote:
> Wait for q1 release of the Canopy 320, all that and more
>
> Gino A. Villarini
> g...@aeronetpr.com
> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
> 787.273.4143
>
> -Original Message---
Good information.
Keep in mind customer self installs != radio in truck bed.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
"The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources."
--- Albert Einstein
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Micha
Q3 is a better guess I think...
Travis
Microserv
Gino Villarini wrote:
> Wait for q1 release of the Canopy 320, all that and more
>
> Gino A. Villarini
> g...@aeronetpr.com
> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
> 787.273.4143
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto
thing lese is a waste of our time and
energy.
Jerry
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Michael Baird
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 11:44 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax gear
Gino,
Where can I fin
Josh,
I tested via a truck, I could take the Alvarion unit and put it on the
back seat of the extended cab, and it worked everywhere within a mile
radius I drove to. This was an outdoor unit with a 14.5 db panel,
strictly speaking I was testing outdoor (I wanted SI's from Alvarion but
they are
Are you (Michael) talking about self install or outdoor install?
Mike (Hammett) is talking about self installs.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
"The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources."
--- Albert Einstein
On
Patrick works for Aperto, they don't support beamshaping/mimo or
802.16e, my Alvarion and Navini gear with the non-mimo subscriber radio
(mimo on the tower) worked at a mile non-LOS. I appreciate the input,
but it disputes my results in the field (rural heavily treed, not urban).
Regards
Michae
Gino,
Where can I find detailed info on the product there doesn't seem to be
much available in regards to it's routing features. I'm also concerned
about the CPE cost/licenses that's what drove us from Canopy before.
Regards
Michael Baird
> Wait for q1 release of the Canopy 320, all that and mo
Self install won't work in 3650 beyond 1/4 mile, maybe 1/2 mile. Patrick
has elaborated on this many times.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "Michael Baird"
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 1:22
Wait for q1 release of the Canopy 320, all that and more
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Michael Baird
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 3
88 matches
Mail list logo
