(See below)
On 8/2/12 9:50 PM, James Ducker wrote:
Second that. If you can version the filenames that's definitely the
most sure-fire way to make sure users don't cache old copies.
James
On 3 August 2012 14:39, Emmanuel Negri nna...@gmail.com
mailto:nna...@gmail.com wrote:
Sometimes a
On 6/29/12 7:20 AM, Kevin Erickson wrote:
Hi, I am asking if anyone uses http://ecsstender.org/ to write CSS
cross-browser code or, if not, what are you using to write CSS
cross-browser or vendor-specific code?
Short answer - I don't even try to make all browsers act alike. :)
Start with a
On 6/29/12 11:08 AM, coder wrote:
- Original Message - From: David Hucklesby
Start with a simple design for mobile and old browsers. Add advanced
CSS inside @media queries or qualified by :root.
qualified by :root? can you give us an example here?
In HTML, :root is functionally
On 2/26/12 2:06 PM, Blumer, Luke wrote:
Hi all,
I have been looking at sites that contain a selection of tools for
content, generally looking after print, email, and text size, shown
in the below site.
http://www.educationtaxrefund.gov.au/
I'm not sure why you'd need that - assuming
On 12/21/11 5:04 AM, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
On 21/12/2011 12:16, coder wrote:
In one sense, this argument is fallacious, because whatever the
web designer does decides what happens when a user just 'clicks a
link'. In my experience, most folk 'out there' don't know about
right clicking. To say
On 12/21/11 9:35 AM, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
On 21/12/2011 17:14, David Hucklesby wrote:
Excellent points. If your reason for wanting to open a new window or tab
is to be helpful, I suggest telling your visitors about the right-click
option right there on your web page.
Ah, but then do you
On 12/19/11 10:47 PM, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Grant Bailey wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone could clarify whether it is possible to
style an attribute. I realise this sounds odd, so allow me to
explain what I wish to do.
In my web page there are a
On 12/2/11 8:01 PM, Stevio wrote:
Thanks for the suggestions. I am trying to develop a flexible layout (so
I do not want to set a width for the parent element) for web sites that
will be used in conjunction with a content management system. The width
of child element will therefore be unknown as
On 11/22/11 6:32 AM, Frances de Waal wrote:
Hi,
Working with the semantical HTML5 elements I keep feeling aversion
to the extra elements I am producing. Like the nav element, using it
as a container for a menu in an list does not feel as an advantage,
I never needed a container for the list
On 11/3/11 10:52 AM, Stevio wrote:
If I have two floats side by side, both are floated left as follow:
.myfloat{ float:left; }
and both contain text as follows:
div class=myfloatLonger amount of text. Longer amount of text.
Longer amount of text. Longer amount of text./div div
On 9/23/11 7:58 AM, Janice Schwarz wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Cole Kuryakinc...@koisis.com
wrote:
[...]
This way of switching browser modes (between 7, 8 and 9) is quite
convenient but... is it a true representation of how the project
will render in these three browsers?
[...]
On 6/15/11 10:24 PM, tee wrote:
Repost, change subject line.
David and Jon,
I am not trying to hide the texts from desktop screen and has screen
reader able to read it - I want the content be available at all time
for search engines, browsers, CSS enabled/disabled and JS
enabled/disabled.
I
despite the slow connection.
On Jun 14, 2011, at 8:21 AM, David Hucklesby wrote:
On 6/13/11 6:31 PM, tee wrote:
Some pages of the site loads very slow in IE7 (about 15
seconds), and while the page was loading and (I assume) IE7 was
still parsing the scripts, all the hidden elements shown through
On 6/13/11 6:31 PM, tee wrote:
Some pages of the site loads very slow in IE7 (about 15 seconds),
and while the page was loading and (I assume) IE7 was still parsing
the scripts, all the hidden elements shown through. I wander if there
is a way to prevent this.
On 6/3/11 7:47 AM, Joseph Taylor wrote:
Try losing the double quotes like:
win.document.write('body style=background-color:
#EBF2FA;h4Loading.../h4img src=ajax-loader.gif
style=border:1px solid;/body');
[...]
On 6/3/11 10:34 AM, Mahendran Venkatesan wrote:
Hi Folks!
I just tried to open
On 3/31/11 1:44 AM, tee wrote:
Thanks all!
On Mar 31, 2011, at 1:05 AM, Fabien BENARIAC wrote:
After upgrading to FF4, most addons worked -- until I restarted
FF.
I just have to re-install firebug... YSlow was ok after for me.
btw, I think a upgrade is usefull (I don't understand why you
On 1/27/11 6:42 AM, Steve Green wrote:
That's exactly my point. At any point in time there will be projects
where you should use safe, well-understood, well-supported
technologies and there will be other projects where you can try out
new cutting-edge ones. When making this choice, you should
On 1/9/11 10:24 AM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
These two essentially are the same. I am assuming the menu is
controlled by a javascript, best practise is to use the absolute
positioning to control submenu and use the toogle or mouseover to
trigger the sub-level.
I'm not sure this is considered
On 1/5/11 11:12 PM, G.Sørtun wrote:
On 06.01.2011 07:21, David Hucklesby wrote:
Here's my attempt to put a gradient behind some headings. To get
Microsoft's gradient filter to work, I must give the headers
layout. This causes the headings to expand in width in IE6, and
to shrink in IE7:
http
On 1/6/11 9:43 AM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Hi David,
It appears to be the existence of hasLayout on the .vcalendar
that causes the problem (due to it being floated...)
I don't think this is the issue per se. Imho, the problem is that
this float is width-less. Give it with a width and things
Re: http://thewebwiz.net/temp/has-layout-long-and-short/
On 1/6/11 5:05 PM, Jon Reece wrote:
Hi David,
Sorry, I was in a hurry and didn't read all that I should have, also
didn't notice that removing hasLayout also removed the filter. Maybe
you want to try PIE (css3pie.com)?
- Jon
That had
On 1/6/11 8:10 PM, Mike Kear wrote:
I have to convert a client site to enable phone users to use the site
and I was wondering what is the best method to detect the mobile user
agent and switch the css sheet?
As far as I have seen, there are a few ways to do this - which is
best? (or maybe the
Here's my attempt to put a gradient behind some headings. To get
Microsoft's gradient filter to work, I must give the headers layout.
This causes the headings to expand in width in IE6, and to shrink in IE7:
http://thewebwiz.net/temp/has-layout-long-and-short/
Any solution, even a scripting
On 12/20/10 6:14 PM, Chad Kelly wrote:
- Original Message - From: Erickson, Kevin (DOE)
kevin.erick...@doe.virginia.gov
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2010 7:51 AM
Subject: RE: [WSG] disallow IE6 to load the main style sheet
Yes. Thank you Felix! best viewed
On 12/20/10 6:57 AM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Using IE conditional comments on the html tag, you can target each
version
of IE.
You can does not mean you should...
In a comment [1] on forabeautifulweb, Molly Holzschlag says:
Please, please don’t design for browsers.
[1]
On 11/30/10 11:52 AM, Erickson, Kevin (DOE) wrote:
Hi All, The website I work with receives a lot of documents to be
posted that come in the form of Word, PowerPoint and Excel documents.
And now, with the release of the latest versions of Ms Office, they
are coming to me with an X on their
On 11/11/10 4:57 AM, G.Sørtun wrote:
Years since I tested what browsers actually did, and much has changed
since then.
I do prefer to spread styles in logical groups over a few stylesheets,
to a certain degree. If nothing else it helps on maintenance and reuse.
1. Will the desktop browser
On 11/1/10 3:15 AM, Foskett, Mike wrote:
Hi David,
How, without using conditional comments at all, do I target IE
6,7, and 8
I was asking how I'd be able to target all three *without* any
CCs.
Add an extra script line?
script type=text/javascript/*![CDATA[*/var
On 10/29/10 3:22 PM, G.Sørtun wrote:
On 29.10.2010 23:33, David Hucklesby wrote:
Perhaps you know of a browser-safe filter for IE8?
Don't know about safe, but maybe you can find what you need here...
http://www.gunlaug.no/contents/styles/target-browser.css
Thank you, Georg. Your valuable
On 10/29/10 2:13 AM, Foskett, Mike wrote:
[...]
David,
How, without using conditional comments at all, do I target IE 6,7,
and 8
From the example:
bg {background: #fff}
.IE6 bg,
.IE7 bg { filter: progid: etc...}
.IE8 bg { -ms-filter: progid: etc}
Precisely. I was asking how I'd be
On 10/29/10 12:05 PM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
goes against the separation of the three layers
No it doesn't, it's purely presentational. No better or worse
thanli class=last
imho, CCs have nothing to do with the presentational layer, they are
part of the structural layer and they are junk
On 10/28/10 5:25 PM, Mathew Robertson wrote:
I'll stick my neck out and say... dont do it for the CSS bit...
specifically, you should be asking - What is the point of adding a
specific class to html/body for a specific browser? In particular,
using this technique discourages the whole graceful
On 10/21/10 2:49 PM, tee wrote:
I tried but couldn't get it to work.
I tried these:
a[href=http://site.com] {color: #e21;background: #555;}
a[href=http://www.site.com] {color: #e21;background: #555;}
a[href=http://subdomain.site.com/] {color: #e21;background: #555;}
this:
table {border-radius: 15px; border-collaspe: collapse} table, th, td
{border:1px solid #369; }
http://www.lotusseedsdesign.com/css-test/table/table.html
tee
On Sep 15, 2010, at 5:59 PM, David Hucklesby wrote:
On 9/15/10 10:42 AM, tee wrote:
When border-collapse is declared, it can't do border
On 9/20/10 2:48 PM, David Hucklesby wrote:
On 9/19/10 2:17 PM, tee wrote:
Hi David,
Just got a chance to revisit this issue.
I want the border radius for table.
[...]
I needed to do something like #6 (still not perfect due to the space
in th cell) without the hassle of #6 codes, but it's
On 9/15/10 10:42 AM, tee wrote:
When border-collapse is declared, it can't do border-radius.
I have this: table {border-collapse:collapse}
Because the site has many table layouts, it's easier to declare
border-collapse in the table, but in one specific table in a given
page I want to use
On 8/18/10 6:14 PM, Lyn Smith wrote:
Good morning
Was wondering what the latest opinions are on using fixed width or
liquid design in light of the ever increasing size of monitor
screens.
[...]
It seems to me, going by the sites I have frequented of late, that
many seem to favour fixed
On 8/12/10 4:57 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
Anyone have any thoughts on this? Worth a try? On a production site?
http://html5boilerplate.com/
Looks pretty good to me... what say ye?
Some useful ideas there, although I won't be using it as-is.
Thanks for sharing.
Cordially,
David
--
On 7/29/10 10:29 AM, tee wrote:
It's been quite a while I have to do a site using EM unit for the
layout width (with max/min-widths treatment), I am getting a shrunk
page in Safari.
In these two examples, the width is 62em which is around 992px
according to pxtoem dot com, but in Safari 5 it's
On 7/22/10 7:13 AM, tee wrote:
On Jul 21, 2010, at 7:43 AM, David Hucklesby wrote:
With all due respect, I suggest you are attempting to control the
uncontrollable far too finely. 0.9em is either one or two pixels
smaller than default, depending on the rounding applied by the
browser
On 7/20/10 9:58 PM, tee wrote:
On Jul 20, 2010, at 7:10 PM, Mathew Robertson wrote:
On 21 July 2010 11:52, tee weblis...@gmail.com
mailto:weblis...@gmail.com wrote:
EM can fail miserably in below senario for IEs for p, li and span
tags due to inheritance making them very tiny and unable to
On 7/20/10 8:25 AM, David Laakso wrote:
Foskett, Mike wrote:
Has anyone on the list considered using keywords?
Mike Foskett
Has anyone conceived of a layout for the page using percent, em,
/and/ pixel width, with the fonts specified in percent [ or em ] :-)
?
Best, ~d
Eric seems to have
On 7/13/10 8:08 PM, Mathew Robertson wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:14 AM, David Hucklesby wrote:
Can you please suggest a font stack suitable for a site that's
entirely in Korean?
The additional information has helped a lot.
And what did you implement?
I passed Andrew Cunningham's
Can you please suggest a font stack suitable for a site that's entirely
in Korean?
I am assisting a student Web designer who is developing a site in
Korean--a language with which I am entirely unfamiliar. Using a font
stack out of Dreamweaver, none of which have any Korean glyphs AFAICT,
On 4/11/10 11:52 PM, Luke Hoggett wrote:
Hi,
SSI header working on IE8 on Win7, sorry no time to check out other
IEs
cheers Luke
On 12/04/2010 3:53 PM, David Hucklesby wrote:
A student at a Web design course asked me how to include a common
heading on all his pages without copy and pasting
On 4/12/10 11:41 AM, Chris F.A. Johnson wrote:
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010, David Hucklesby wrote:
A student at a Web design course asked me how to include a common
heading on all his pages without copy and pasting into each. I walked
him through the process of making a Server-Side Include.
http
A student at a Web design course asked me how to include a common
heading on all his pages without copy and pasting into each. I walked
him through the process of making a Server-Side Include.
http://webwiz.robinshosting.com/jaime/
This is a demo I made for him. The view source is named with
On 4/4/10 2:53 AM, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
... one thing blockquote does have that q doesn't is also the cite
attribute (as minimally useful as it is today).
I believe that Q elements do allow the cite attribute. But, as you say,
this is rarely useful. Q may be more useful when writing in
On 3/3/10 9:47 PM, Chakravarthy, Srikanth wrote:
[...]
Now is there any way I can identify what CSS properties are not
behaving properly in IE6? Is there any way that I can make the pages
compatible with IE6?
Any reference link or suggestion will be of immense help.
The first thing to
On 2/25/10 5:00 PM, Stephen Holmes (Gmail) wrote:
Hi,
Just noticed this in the WSG List:
Removing any characters before!DOCTYPE ... really does miracles,
because now the layouts is much better under IE/Safari/Chrome/FF.
This is because if the first thing a browser sees is anything BUT a
On 1/13/10 12:24 PM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Nick Zoom:1 is not bad enough to warrant a conditional comment and
separate style sheet. It's a valid rule that basically says show
the screen at 100%. A user style sheet can still over-ride this
rule. It's an easy way to add hasLayout without causing
On 1/11/10 11:25 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
Hello list,
I tried to repurpose this example from Eric Meyer:
http://meyerweb.com/eric/css/edge/popups/demo.html
His page works in IE6.
My attempt, however, does not. Can anyone see why?
http://www.mlinc.com/css_popup/
Thanks in advance
Yup. You
ピエールランリ・ラヴィン wrote:
Actually is not enough. Accesskey is a good way about the accessibility,
but it's not completed.
I didn't check the latest WCAG and the latest version of screen readers
but:
* Keyboards shortcuts depend from the UA (the specifications didn't
define it)
* Users may define
James Ducker wrote:
Hi there,
As a test, try using that style on an element that isn't floated or
inside a floated element.
That was worth a try - I added a break-after to the preceding
paragraph, but Safari 4 seems intent on ignoring my wishes.
(I double-checked in other browsers - either
Nick Fitzsimons wrote:
2009/10/14 David Hucklesby huckle...@gmail.com:
James Ducker wrote:
Hi there,
As a test, try using that style on an element that isn't floated or inside
a floated element.
That was worth a try - I added a break-after to the preceding
paragraph, but Safari 4 seems
David Hucklesby wrote:
Trying to put the entire printed recipe on its own printed page, most
browsers honor my page-break-before: always; declaration. I can't
get this to work nohow no way in Webkit (Safari and Chrome), even by
adding !important...
http://yewebwiz.info/temp/kam/
The rule
Trying to put the entire printed recipe on its own printed page, most
browsers honor my page-break-before: always; declaration. I can't get
this to work nohow no way in Webkit (Safari and Chrome), even by adding
!important...
http://yewebwiz.info/temp/kam/
The rule is first in the @print
Cole Kuryakin wrote:
[...]
One MAJOR problem with using background images for the flag buttons
is the fact that each entry could carry any one of 200+ flags. That's
a WHOLE LOT of background declarations! No matter what type of more
semantic structure I end up using for this I'm afraid I'll
Dale Cruse wrote:
I've been using IE Collection at
http://finalbuilds.edskes.net/iecollection.htm
You can download it and have versions of IE all the way back to 1.0!
---
I just downloaded and tested this, selecting IE 5.01, IE 5.5, IE 6.0,
and IE 7. They react as expected to the usual
Chris Taylor wrote:
Hi,
tee said:
However, seeing that HTML 5 has given hr tag a new purpose:
http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#the-hr-element
http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#flow-content-0
quote: The hr element represents a paragraph-level thematic break,
e.g. a scene
Naveen Bhaskar wrote:
Hi,
Which is the right method to position a logo in the header.
with
* position :relative;top:10px; left:10px;*
or
*margin:10px 0 0 10px;*
**
pls rell me the pros and cons
**
Depends on how you want the logo to interact with the rest of the
header. Relative
Dennis Lapcewich wrote:
While I agree with your general sentiment, I have to say I find
the assertion that all people aged 35-40 or more are for all
intents and purposes [...] web disabled and [...] in immediate
need of web accessibility questionable, to say the least.
I really don't see what
Joseph Taylor wrote re: http://www.hellobenlau.net/wsg/index.html
Ben,
On the spacing, the spaces you're fighting with are a combination of
line-height, margin and padding.
Each browser will implement their own defaults, so resetting the
defaults with a reset stylesheet has become a popular
Jens-Uwe Korff wrote:
Hi all,
I believe making sites accessible is very important.
We are all used to ramps near stairs, lifts near escalators, lowered
curbs at intersections. We need to get used to baking in time into
our projects for accessible elements.
[...]
I agree wholeheartedly.
Aaron Wheeler wrote:
Hi All
I was wondering if I can pick all your brains on an issue I am
facing. I am not a big coder and good when it comes to JavaScript. I
have recently taken charge of maintaining a website for a client who
uses divs to display data onto a .htm page. They do not want to
(Joseph's reply moved to the bottom)
On 6/27/09 1:32 AM, David Hucklesby wrote:
Stevio wrote:
Is it possible to expand a container's width to fit its content?
Well, IE 6 treats width as min-width and likely does what you
want. Non-IE browsers behave similarly if you add a display:
table
David Dorward wrote:
David Hucklesby wrote:
I don't see anything in the W3C recommendations that forbids frames of
any kind?
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/index/elements.html clearly marks iframe as a
feature of the Loose (AKA transitional) DTD.
A question of knowing where to look. Thanks
Stevio wrote:
Is it possible to expand a container's width to fit its content?
Well, IE 6 treats width as min-width and likely does what you want.
Non-IE browsers behave similarly if you add a display: table; declaration.
Don't know how to deal with IE 7 though... :(
Cordially,
David
--
Damian Edwards wrote:
[...]
It only affects a few elements on the page (see links below) and is
driving us mental. We need to serve this page as transitional as it
uses a 3rd party service that requires an iframe. ...
I don't see anything in the W3C recommendations that forbids frames
Marvin Hunkin wrote:
looking for a free web hosting account that can handle side
scripting, able to use such technologies as visual web developer, sql
server, visualbasic, java script,etc.
[...]
so if any one can help out and recommend a good one which also has
plenty of large space. and
Ted Drake wrote:
This is a very confusing email. The host has nothing to do with how
screen-reader friendly your web site is. Are you looking for a host
which has a screen-reader friendly admin interface? This would be
geared to the developer not the end user.
I think Marvin needs to find a
Brett Patterson wrote:
I meant that rather than using image mapping for hyperlinks, you
could use it to (sort of) point out a particular part of an image, as
if you wanted to show someone who can see which person in a picture
is you if they hover their mouse over that image map. And you can use
Christian Montoya wrote:
I am looking into delivering an iPhone-specific stylesheet and I came
across this:
For example, to specify a style sheet for iPhone, use an expression
similar to the following:
link media=only screen and (max-device-width: 480px)
href=small-device.css type= text/css
tee wrote:
Stumble on one more annoying Opera bug that I am unable to figure
exactly which element, and what is causing it.
[...]
bad-opera-2.html http://tinyurl.com/o5b259
2 columns layout, with left column intact
Left column remains, and the right column has a large image which the
tee wrote:
Stumble on one more annoying Opera bug that I am unable to figure
exactly which element, and what is causing it.
[...]
bad-opera-2.html http://tinyurl.com/o5b259
2 columns layout, with left column intact
Left column remains, and the right column has a large image which the
Mike Kear wrote:
I'm looking at a whole bunch of icons to use in a new app I'm
building, and rather than convert them all to gifs, I was thinking
of leaving them as the .png format they are now.They work on all
the browsers I use, but I'm wondering what everyone else's experience
has been
tee wrote:
Anybody use IE8 compatible mode to test IE7/6 instead of standalone
version?
Well, in my case I have a Conditional Comment for [if lt IE 8] that's
supposed to make my h1 red if true; green if not. Now I installed IE 8
and not only IE 8 shows green (as expected) but in Compatibility
Chris F.A. Johnson wrote:
We were told in the past by a massive client that for accessibility purposes
font sizes needed to be set to 74% as a minimum as the basic reading size
below which it's a straign on the eyes.
To answer the O.P. question about IE box sizing-- I think the issue has
Stevio wrote:
[...]
Essentially I reckon it comes down to equal height columns in liquid
layouts. Any suggestions on how to best accomplish this?
There is this:
http://matthewjamestaylor.com/blog/equal-height-columns-cross-browser-css-no-hacks
Cordially,
David
--
You wrote:
Other than using an img element and alt attribute, what image
replacement techniques are also accessible?
This is worth a look:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/tip.asp
Cordially,
David
--
***
List Guidelines:
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:26:33 +1100, Chris Vickery wrote:
Does anyone know where I could find a best practice guide to naming URLs?
We're trying to keep our URLs descriptive like...
www.whatever.com/news/events/index.html
...but not like this...
www.whatever.com/news articles/Events Sent
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 03:37:19 -0800, tee wrote:
IS 200% one time font size increasement or two?
While FF 3 does not tell you, Firebug will show you the calculated
font-size in pixels after re-sizing. In the CSS panel, choose Options
Show computed style.
Hope this helps.
Cordially,
David
--
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 03:37:19 -0800, tee wrote:
IS 200% one time font size increasement or two?
While FF 3 does not tell you, Firebug will show you the calculated
font-size in pixels after re-sizing. In the CSS panel, choose Options
Show computed style.
Hope this helps.
Cordially,
David
--
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:29:52 +, James Jeffery wrote:
Hey all,
Quick question. I have some data pulled from a database (50 of the most recent
categories/tags). These are positioned in a list in 2 columns (example below):
-
Category1Category5
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:15:38 +1100, Anthony Ziebell wrote:
Oh, also... there is a requirement for our pages to validate (hence I can
only see
JavaScript as a valid option at this point?)
*Is* there a requirement for our pages to validate? I would have
thought that making a page more
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:37:29 +1100, Marvin Hunkin wrote:
Hi.
got these three errors.
but cannot seem to fix them.
can you help.
cheers Marvin.
W3C CSS Validator results for
file://localhost/C:\DOCS\MarvinsWebsite\styles.css (CSS level 2.1) Sorry! We
found the
following errors (3)
URI :
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 16:36:45 +1100, Jens-Uwe Korff wrote:
Hi experts,
I'm running into big rendering differences between Google Chrome and Safari
3.1/PC.
They are said to render pages the same, given that they're using the same
Webkit engine.
The differences seem to be mainly due to the
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:03:46 +, kevin mcmonagle wrote:
Hi I'm trying to modify this template to work with a footer. The problem is
getting a
footer to float below the right side div. I can't figure out how to keep
#sidebar
liquid but still float a footer under it. Is it possible.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 1:03 PM, Marvin Hunkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
rebuilding my site.
and i have the following fonts in my style sheet.
georgia, century school book, courrier, new courrier, comic ms, and others.
but i
notice, that on my local hard disk, or when i did have it on
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 1:03 PM, Marvin Hunkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
rebuilding my site.
and i have the following fonts in my style sheet.
georgia, century school book, courrier, new courrier, comic ms, and others.
but i
notice, that on my local hard disk, or when i did have it on
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:36:52 +0200, Rimantas Liubertas wrote:
I made the same decision. I still follow HTML and XHTML, but anything I do
(and have
a choice about) is always HTML 4.01 Strict. I think it makes more sense than
XHTML
1.0 Strict at this point since we can't really use real XHTML
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:02:21 +0500, Fuji kusaka wrote:
Is there any way to code css (not conditional inline css), so that the CSS
apply online
to FF?
I'm confused. Your subject line refers to IE, yet your question only
refers to FF.(?)
If you wish to target Firefox only, it will very much
? Is there an ideal aspect value for screen
display?
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 8:41 PM, David Hucklesby [EMAIL PROTECTED] replied:
Hi Christian,
I believe that Firefox 3 supports it, but must admit I have not tried using
it.
Interestingly I can't see the property listed in Sitepoint's Ultimate
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:36:26 -0400, Christian Montoya wrote:
- What's the support across browsers / machines for the font-size-adjust
property?
- Is adjusting the aspect value bad form? Is this as bad as letter-spacing
body copy?
Would this kill sheep?
- Has anyone done this before? Is
On 17/10/2008, at 12:27 AM, Charles Ling wrote:
Hi Guys/Gals,
I would like to get some opinion from you all, that would Flash 10 or ++
will replace
JavaScript in the future? According to this blog :
http://ajaxian.com/archives/flash-
10-and-the-bad-news-for-javascript-interaction .
On
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 22:24:03 -0700, tee wrote:
Maybe this is something impossible with CSS, still I hope I am wrong and hope
someone
who knows better than me able to tell me yes, it can be done.
In a block where I have min-height declared, something like this:
div class=box
div
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:49:59 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Seeing as though Google's new Chrome browser uses the same rendering engine
as Apple's
Safari, would it be acceptable to test browser layout issues in Chrome and
assume the
same CSS solutions apply in Safari?
Does anyone
2008/9/27 Daisy Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello all
I can't seem to find a definitive answer on this via Google - is it best
practice to
use something like the pipe character ( | ) to separate links in
a menu so that screenreader software pauses between the list items? Any
recommended
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 01:09:38 -0700, tee wrote:
Anybody encounters this?
The checkbox inherits the input declaration, and though I added a class to
overwrite
it, with height and width, still I can't see the 'tick'.
Another annoying thing with Opera, is that if I have background or border
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 20:55:07 +1000, David McKinnon wrote:
For a while now, I've been operating on the principle Code for Firefox, hack
for IE.
Interesting thread.
I learned CSS from Eric Meyer on CSS books. He gives several ideas
for avoiding browser bugs and related hacks altogether.
FWIW
1 - 100 of 223 matches
Mail list logo
