are you
running?
Jordan
/*
* Jordan Vaughan
* Solaris Kernel Developer
* jordan.vaug...@sun.com
* blogs.sun.com/lunchware
*/
On 02/13/09 16:48, Christine Tran wrote:
I'm writing a script that adds an LOFS to a zone, using a pre-made
batch file it works but I rather generate this on the fly
+1
Jordan
On 04/23/09 09:02, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
I would like to propose a project to be sponsored by
the zones community. This project would create a
solaris10 branded zone for use on OpenSolaris.
We will use the BrandZ infrastructure to deliver a
solaris10 brand. This will be provided as
Hi swagman,
You can lump the commands into a single zonecfg execution by passing
them as a single string argument in which the commands are separated by
semicolons. Using your example:
zonecfg -z zfoo set zonepath=/zonefs/zfoo; add net; set
physical=foonic0; end
Hope that helps,
Jordan
Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
hey all,
could i get a code review for this two line change:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~edp/onnv-bugs1/
6850112 zonecfg verify should verify the native brand type
thanks
ed
___
zones-discuss mailing list
Hi Robinsky,
The ipkg brand does not support '-m copy' because the IPS packaging
system requires that zones have specific ZFS dataset hierarchies. A
straight file-to-file copy without setting up the requisite datasets
(which is what '-m copy' normally does) would incapacitate the new zone.
On 07/28/09 09:42 AM, Steffen Weiberle wrote:
On 07/27/09 23:40, Jack LING wrote:
dear all,
I've installed mysql and glassfish packages in my OpenSolaris 2009.06
installation in VirtualBox. Then I created a non-global zone (I think
it is sparse-root, by default).
Within the non-global
On 08/14/09 02:55 PM, v wrote:
I created an exclusive IP zone. Now I want to configure it using sysidcfg and
avoid the prompts at the initial login.
I created the below sysidcfg file:
timezone=US/Eastern
system_locale=C
terminal=xterms
network_interface=vnic1 {dhcp protocol_ipv6=yes}
On 08/20/09 01:59 PM, sai prasath wrote:
Hi
I have installed open solaris on HP Proliant ML 370 G6.While creating zones
I am getting error message for the following command.
#zfs create -o canmount=noauto rpool/ROOT/S10be/zones
cannot create 'rpool/ROOT/S10be/zones': parent does not exist.
On 09/14/09 01:55 PM, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
hey all,
just a quick heads up.
it's been on my todo list for a very long time (and i figured that i
really should get it done before the xwiki migration), so i finally
merged all the brandz community content into the zones community. you
can see
On 10/ 1/09 05:40 AM, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
i'm not done yet, but i've attached what i've got so far.
Ed,
Thanks for your comments. I'll start to work through
these while we're waiting for the rest of your input and
respond if there is anything we're not going to
Hi Ed,
usr/src/head/libzonecfg.h
This isn't critical, but shouldn't zonecfg_default_brand() be declared
somewhere other than the group of privilege-related functions?
Perhaps it should go under higher-level routines.
Other than that, this looks good to me.
Thanks,
Jordan
On 10/16/09
On 11/ 4/09 11:53 AM, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
hey all,
so with my recent zoneadm mount putback i broke the native brand on
nevada. i've got a webrev with the one line fix here:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~edp/onnv-zmount2
6898056 native zones no longer boot: zone 'public': missing or invalid
On 11/18/09 11:19 AM, Christian Tovar Duran wrote:
Hi
I have the application RSA, but I dont know is supported in Solaris 10
containers, can you help me?
Gracias y saludos
Hi Christian,
If RSA is supported in native Solaris 10u8+ zones, then it should work
in Solaris 10 Containers as
On 11/19/09 09:16 PM, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
hey all,
i need a review for the following bugfix:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~edp/onnv-zmount3/
6901952 zoneadm fails with unable to determine default brand
thanks
ed
___
zones-discuss mailing list
On 11/21/09 15:26, Bryan Allen wrote:
+--
| On 2009-11-21 15:25:22, Hosam Al Ali wrote:
|
| aho...@xx:~# zoneadm -z myzone install
| /mnt/zone/myzone must not be group readable.
| /mnt/zone/myzone must not be group
If I remember correctly, zbe datasets' mountpoints should be set to
legacy. rpool/var/zones/oracle-1/ROOT/zbe's mountpoint isn't legacy
on your snv_127 system. What was rpool/var/zones/oracle-1/ROOT/zbe's
mountpoint property's value on the snv_125 system prior to the zfs send
operation?
On 12/ 4/09 02:28 PM, Anil wrote:
Once a the global zone is upgraded (and rebooted with the new BE), what is the
best way to update the zones?
It seems like all I would need to do is:
pkg -R zone path/root image-update
reboot zone
This seems like a hack, how would post package processing
On 12/ 4/09 03:02 PM, Anil wrote:
Ah, thanks. I knew that was available on Solaris but not in OpenSolaris. The
man page had no reference to the -u option (I take it you meant -u and not -U).
I will try that out later.
It probably is -u but I used -U and it worked fine. Go with -u
just to
On 12/ 7/09 04:19 PM, xx wrote:
i am following the zonecfg script at the bottom of:
http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Community+Group+zones/s10brand_dev_guide
however i fail to create the SUNWsolaris10 zone:
init...@dogpatch:~# uname -a
SunOS dogpatch 5.11 snv_128a i86pc i386 i86pc
Hi Frank,
I'd be happy with ditching -x nodataset and requiring that zonepaths be
backed by ZFS datasets. Only lx-branded zones would be able to support
the option but I don't know any reasons why someone wouldn't want his
lx-branded zones to be backed by ZFS datasets. Is managing an
On 12/ 9/09 03:04 PM, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 02:54:05PM -0800, Jordan Vaughan wrote:
I need someone to review my fix for
6882732 unpacking archive with extended file attributes reports errors
The webrev is accessible via
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~flippedb/onnv-s10c
On 12/ 9/09 03:45 PM, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Jordan Vaughan wrote:
I need someone to review my fix for
6882732 unpacking archive with extended file attributes reports errors
The webrev is accessible via
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~flippedb/onnv-s10c
Jordan,
Nice job, this looks good to me
On 12/ 8/09 11:50 AM, xx wrote:
when updating from 126 to 128, one zone would attach:
init...@dogpatch:~/.VirtualBox/HardDisks$ pfexec zoneadm -z ldap attach -U
Log File: /var/tmp/ldap.attach_log.9hay7p
Attaching...
Global zone version: ent...@0.5.11,5.11-0.128:20091125T051747Z
On 12/11/09 05:24 AM, Frank Batschulat (Home) wrote:
friends, may I request code review for the earth-shattering fix to:
6495558 zoneadm -z zone boot should not only check but repair filesystems
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~batschul/onnv-vplat/
backround:
Evaluation
when booting a zone,
I need someone to review my fix for
6782448 libzonecfg may return uninitialized memory to zoneadm and zoneadmd
The webrev is temporarily accessible via
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~flippedb/onnv-zone2
Thanks,
Jordan
___
zones-discuss mailing list
On 12/15/09 07:39 AM, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
I have an initial code review for the fix for bug:
6768950 panic[cpu1]/thread=ff084ce0b3e0: syscall_asm_amd64.s:480
lwp ff0756a8cdc0, pcb_rupdate != 0
There is a webrev at:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gjelinek/webrev.6768950/
The code
On 12/17/09 10:17 AM, Frank Batschulat (Home) wrote:
May I have 2 code reviewers for:
6911329 Incorrect code in kstat_delete causes panic
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~batschul/onnvkstat/
Description
A colleague was looking into a crash and the reason turned out to be a NULL
pointer
As Steve said, libumem will be your best tool for this job.
Is the program zone-aware? The program might behave differently (i.e.,
its logic is different) while running in non-global zones and the
alternative code paths might be leaking memory.
Jordan
On 12/17/09 11:23 AM, Steve Lawrence
I expanded my webrev to include my fix for
6910339 zonecfg coredumps with badly formed 'select net defrouter'
I need someone to review my changes. The webrev is still accessible via
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~flippedb/onnv-zone2
Thanks,
Jordan
___
I need someone to review my fix for
6909222 reboot of system upgraded from 128 to build 129 generated error
from an s10 zone due to boot-archive
My webrev is accessible via
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~flippedb/onnv-s10c
Thanks,
Jordan
___
That's a good idea. I updated the webrev.
Thanks,
Jordan
On 12/21/09 05:08 PM, Steve Lawrence wrote:
Minor nit. You could use != POC_STRING, put the Z_NO_ENTRY in the {}, and
put the success case after. Not a required change.
LGTM.
-Steve
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 07:28:52PM -0800, Jordan
involve removing the fix
for 6909222 (since it would essentially be obsoleting this fix.)
ed
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 03:46:00PM -0800, Jordan Vaughan wrote:
I need someone to review my fix for
6909222 reboot of system upgraded from 128 to build 129 generated
error from an s10 zone due to boot
will
rarely occur.
Thanks again for the review,
Jordan
On 12/22/09 07:06 AM, Frank Batschulat (Home) wrote:
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:46:00 +0100, Jordan Vaughan jordan.vaug...@sun.com
wrote:
I need someone to review my fix for
6909222 reboot of system upgraded from 128 to build 129 generated
Hi Frank,
Thanks for reviewing my fix. I'll respond to your questions below.
On 12/22/09 05:55 AM, Frank Batschulat (Home) wrote:
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 04:28:52 +0100, Jordan Vaughan jordan.vaug...@sun.com
wrote:
I expanded my webrev to include my fix for
6910339 zonecfg coredumps
Frank Batschulat (Home) wrote:
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 01:34:59 +0100, Jordan Vaughan jordan.vaug...@sun.com
wrote:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~flippedb/onnv-zone2
[...]
zone_lookup_nwif() needs the three loop checks.
I regenerated the webrev. You'll notice that the assertion was replaced
On 01/ 4/10 07:26 AM, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Jordan Vaughan wrote:
I need someone to review my fix for
6909222 reboot of system upgraded from 128 to build 129 generated
error from an s10 zone due to boot-archive
My webrev is accessible via
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~flippedb/onnv-s10c
On 12/23/09 12:40 AM, Frank Batschulat (Home) wrote:
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:46:00 +0100, Jordan Vaughan jordan.vaug...@sun.com
wrote:
I need someone to review my fix for
6909222 reboot of system upgraded from 128 to build 129 generated error
from an s10 zone due to boot-archive
My webrev
On 01/ 4/10 09:57 AM, Enda O'Connor wrote:
Hi Jordan
Not being too familiar with the underlying technology, I assume
s10_boot.ksh is run every boot, as otherwise a patch can deliver
create_ramdisk to the system after it's removed.
Enda
Correct.
Thanks,
Jordan
On 01/ 4/10 09:54 AM, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Jordan Vaughan wrote:
On 01/ 4/10 07:26 AM, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Jordan Vaughan wrote:
I need someone to review my fix for
6909222 reboot of system upgraded from 128 to build 129 generated
error from an s10 zone due to boot-archive
My webrev
On 01/ 4/10 10:25 AM, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Jordan Vaughan wrote:
On 01/ 4/10 09:54 AM, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Jordan Vaughan wrote:
On 01/ 4/10 07:26 AM, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
Jordan Vaughan wrote:
I need someone to review my fix for
6909222 reboot of system upgraded from 128 to build 129
On 01/14/10 08:18 AM, Jerry Jelinek wrote:
I need a code review for my proposed fix for:
6887823 brandz on x86 should ignore %gs and simplify brand hooks
There is a webrev at:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gjelinek/webrev.6887823/
This simplifies some of the handling for the %gs register,
Hi Dick,
Use the dataset resource in zonecfg(1M):
---8---
root arrakis [14:20:17]# zfs list rpool/test
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
rpool/test19K 190G19K /rpool/test
root arrakis [14:20:18]# zoneadm list -civ
ID NAME STATUS PATH
On 02/ 3/10 04:11 PM, Ted Ward wrote:
Hello all.
I am trying to migrate a zone on OpenSolaris from one identical system
to another. It's going from x86 to sparc, but even when going from x86
to x86 I get the same error. Here's the build of both systems
SunOS hostname 5.11 snv_111b i86pc
On 02/15/10 01:01 PM, Dombrowski, Neil wrote:
If I have a non-global zone running sendmail, and I run “ps –ef |grep
sendmail” in the global zone, will I see the sendmail processes running
for the non-global zone and the global zone?
Thanks,
Neil
On 02/19/10 10:32 AM, Frank Batschulat (Home) wrote:
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:39:21 +0100, Jerry Jelinekgerald.jeli...@sun.com
wrote:
On 02/19/10 06:53, Frank Batschulat (Home) wrote:
May I request 2 code reviewers for the changes for:
6914152 zonecfg fails when less(1M) is missing
On 02/21/10 08:33 AM, Anil wrote:
Never mind. I will not do this rename. It's not worth the trouble.
r...@vps1:~# zoneadm -z note move /zones/note
Moving across file systems; copying zonepath /zones/bugs...sh[1]: cd:
/zones/bugs: [No such file or directory]
zoneadm: zone 'note': 'copy' failed
Hi Paul,
I wrote the code that introduced the zcons (zone console) ioctl that's
failing on your system. I'll investigate this problem as soon as possible.
Does this problem occur consistently (i.e., every time you boot your
system)? Does it ever happen when you manually boot a zone?
keegam wrote:
I just built a new opensolaris server. This is my first time using opensolaris.
I'm mirroring a sol10 environment, so that could be where i went wrong.
Here is the zonecfg info:
zonecfg -z myzone info
zonename: myzone
zonepath: /zones/myzone
brand: ipkg
autoboot: true
bootargs:
Try pkg search /usr/sbin/pkgadd:
---8---
arrakis [12:39:03 0]% pkg search `whence pkgadd`
[...]
path file usr/sbin/pkgadd pkg:/sunwpkgc...@0.5.11-0.132
path file usr/sbin/pkgadd pkg:/package/s...@0.5.11-0.133
path file usr/sbin/pkgadd pkg:/package/s...@0.5.11-0.134
Hi Gael,
No, there is no supported way to convert an S8- or S9-branded zone to a
native Solaris 10 zone.
Regards,
Jordan
On 09/17/10 06:27 PM, Gael wrote:
Hello
Now that p2v supports S10 with U9, is there some automated easier way
to convert existing solaris 8/9 branded zones into native
Try the ldoms-discuss mailing list.
Jordan
On 09/27/10 11:13 AM, Sanjay Akula wrote:
Hi,
Need help, How can I assign Qlogic HBA's to virtual domain in Ldoms?
Thanks,
--
Regards,
SysAdmin
___
zones-discuss mailing list
Is there a way to disable all remote connections to the GZ? In other
words, couldn't you use a firewall to reject connections on all ports to
the GZ? That would effectively deny remote access to the GZ without
having to disable any network interfaces.
Of course, disabling the GZ's
Locked memory is the same as pinned memory: In other words, pages
that won't be paged to disk. Applications can request that pages be
locked into memory. The pager won't page locked pages to disk.
Regarding an appropriate value for desktop usage: It depends on what
kinds of applications
53 matches
Mail list logo
