[Dieter Maurer]
| Have a look at "Date" properties. They are already objects.
Yes, you are correct.
WarpFramework, which I'm using for this project has support for the
type of properties I'm talking about. Rather, a framework for using
properties. Getting similar behaviour into Zope was the
[Chris Withers]
| Go look at ComputedAttributes...
Yupp. But are you suggesting that ComputedAttributes are the end-all
be-all solution to the problem I proposed, or only a part of it?
As I see it, they hardly specify a framework for attributes.
__
'Evening, Zopistas.
I'm developing an accounting product right now, and one of the more
interesting aspects of how to solve this issue is how do handle
currencies. I've decided to let each entry (transaction) know about
the currency it was in. At a later stage, the user is given the
option to c
[Michael R. Bernstein]
| On Wed, 2001-09-12 at 22:45, Erik Enge wrote:
|
| > *scabbers off to the CVS* Thanks! :)
|
| Eeew!
|
| I hope you meant 'scampers', as I have horrific visions of what
| 'scabbering off' would look like...
Hehe! Oops... Yeah, that's
[Evan Simpson]
| If you grab OFS/Traversal.py (I think) from the CVS root, it should
| fix the problem.
*scabbers off to the CVS* Thanks! :)
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross post
[Erik Enge]
| def index_html(self):
| """we have a doc string"""
| return DTMLFile('index_html', globals())
|
| And that worked [...]
Actually it doesn't. Don't know why I thought it did.
This however does work:
index_
[Dario Lopez-Kästen]
| I need to be able do some processing for each and every request that
| is sent to zope to determine some enviromental thingies, *before*
| the request is processed by the main zope mechanisms.
I'm not entirely sure, but you might be looking for something like this:
http:/
Hi!
I've have this custom __bobo_traverse__ hook:
def __bobo_traverse__(self, REQUEST, name):
"""Intercept the traversal"""
if name:
if hasattr(self, name):
return getattr(self, name)
When I call the object like this:
/objecta
ie. using __call
Hi,
I'm trying to use PersistentMapping instead of a regular mapping
object, but I'm running into some problems. When I add and remove
stuff from the mapping it sometimes fail or removes the wrong thing.
Do I need adapt my code to it, or should it be straight forward?
___
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Other than: http://dev.zope.org/Resources/ZopeDirections.html?
Well, it is from February. And besides, it describes what we
have/semi-have now, and not what is planned for the future (for
example, where do DC think Zope is in three, four or five years?)
__
[alan runyan]
| I believe that before ZOPE can truely take off it will need a
| miniVend like solution to get the PHP/CF/ASPers to ZOPE.
What is "miniVend"?
| I would like to see a Roadmap for ZOPE.
Aye!
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
h
[Jerry Spicklemire]
| How about treating some of the most critically needed Zope modules
| as a community project?
I agree totally.
| Can a community wide process be adopted so that an architecture can
| be established, and the components then be built by individuals or
| small teams, and then
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Edgardo Zulian wrote:
> I'm just new with Zope, and I m trying to make an external method with
> python that return me the names of the "files" that are in an especific
> folder of the Zope i.e:"the folder: Root Folder/function_repository"..
I'm not quite sure what you want
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Stephan Richter wrote:
> All what the wizard will do is provide the user with a nice
> interface/GUI to enter the information. I will then pass the
> information to the above mentioned management methods and the
> MakeZProduct Product will then generate the code and save it t
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Stephan Richter wrote:
> I think we need to setup a separate mailing list for this project. Can
> you do that? I think the discussion is getting too specific now.
We can use the mk-zprod-devel mailinglist at thingamy.com:
http://www.thingamy.com/mailman/listinfo/mk-zprod-de
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Stephan Richter wrote:
> For example we would need:
>
> manage_make_initializeProduct(...)
> manage_make_addClass(...)
> manage_make_addProperty(...)
> manage_make_addIcon(...)
> manage_make_addSubClass(mainClass, ...)
I just realised something. How do you need this to wor
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Stephan Richter wrote:
> Well, but where are the images coming from. The Wizard is a Web
> Frontend, so we would need to upload the images or copy them from
> somewhere else from the file system.
>From the filesystem of the user?
> BTW, the /img directory is non-standard. B
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Erik Enge wrote:
> name: attrib1 default value: None
> name: attrib2 default value: "something"
No, that wouldn't work, because you might want None as the default for
that attribute. Maybe Noth
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Stephan Richter wrote:
> Here my list of questions:
>
> 1. Will we create ZClass or Python Products?
Python Products.
> >Product-name
>
> 2. I think it should ask some more meta-data information here, such as
> License, Author(s), Description
Yepp :)
> >A list o
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Tino Wildenhain wrote:
> Hm. a simple collection of questions? Certainly not. I talking of a
> whole mechanism, where you group input and output into contexts. From
> application view it would be an API, it schould work no matter if the
> input/ output is generated from and t
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Stephan Richter wrote:
> If I have some time left at all tonight, I will make a wizard that
> could be the initial front-end to mk-zprod. Could you give me a short
> list of things you would like to ask the user?
Product-name
A list of images (like dtmldoc.gif and such)
If y
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Tino Wildenhain wrote:
> if there are always many objects to create, may be it would be better
> to have a generic mechanism for asking users and represent
> app-/management interfaces rather then copying all the stuff over and
> over?
That's what mk-zprod does. Or rather,
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Paul Everitt wrote:
> It is a *desire* of ours to be GPL-compatible. Not a requirement, as
> it can be awfully tricky, complicated, and time-consuming to get
> there. But we've told people that we're intending to give it a shot.
That's much appretiated :)
___
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Stephan Richter wrote:
> Exactly that. But the SmartWizard would provide you with a framework
> to build this "Make New Python Product Wizard". If I get far enough, I
> will release the pre alpha today, just you see the proof of concept...
Cool! I'll be looking forward to i
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Stephan Richter wrote:
> Okay, okay...I stayed up and typed it down pretty quick (2 hours). I
> attached it to this mail. It is plain text, since I was too lazy to do
> it in HTML. It might be a little unstructured, but I am too tired to
> fix that now.
So what does it do?
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Stephan Richter wrote:
> I looked at the code pretty quick. I like it from the first view. It
> is very clean and easy to see the functionality. I think, if you can
> define an ZPI for your communication, then it will be no problem to
> put a SmartWizard Class Generator Front
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Stephan Richter wrote:
> 1. We are building a wizard that asks you all the necessary questions
> to generate a basic class framwework.
Sounds exactly like my mk-zprod.
> If anyone is interested in helping developing that tool (which will be
> released under the GPL as all o
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Eric Roby wrote:
> I will be checking out mk-zprod.
If you find it useful I can upgrade it to the next release which I've been
think of for some time now (I was actually going to do it some months ago,
but someone let all my time out... I'm tracking it down now.. Muhaha).
On 26 Jun 2001, Michael R. Bernstein wrote:
> DC has been up-fron about how they make money. They do so by selling
> development services using Zope as a toolkit/platform.
Yes, and forcing those paying customers to use GPL is very hard (and not
very nice, either).
> Well, I guess the issue is
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Andy McKay wrote:
> One thing Id been musing about for a while was a ZClass > Python Product
> script that took your ZClass and set up your basic python product for you.
> It would only work for simple for things like permissions, properties, basic
> methods... Then ZClasses
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Morten W. Petersen wrote:
> How about meta-programming (designing) via the Zope interface, with
> UML or somesuch; automatically generating Python code, then enable
> designers to use a ZFormulator-ish product to edit the interface while
> a programmer can work on the 'backen
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Eric Roby wrote:
> The bottom line to all this venting (and I am not trying to shoot the
> messenger here) is that I need to understand where my efforts should
> be focused. If I need to abandon ZClasses in lieu of pure Python,
> then I need to know that now so I don't waste
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Giovanni Maruzzelli wrote:
> I'm not so picky about bloating, but adding a document of 1K adds some
> 400K, and keeps growing.
:
> How much eat for you (I know you cataloged some 50K documents)?
I can't remember, but surely not that much. I had some 30.000 documents
that w
Giovanni, which Zope version are you running?
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> How many indexes do you have, what are the index types, and what do
> they index? Likewise, what about metadata? In your last message, you
> said there's about 20. That's a heck of a lot of indexes. D
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Jerome Alet wrote:
> Java comes to mind, guess who is the "powerful entity" ;-)
:)
I really can't see that Java has been bastardized by it, though.
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listin
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Jerome Alet wrote:
> For Zope it's not sure, but for Python, as well as for all what people
> usually call "open source" languages, the license of choice should be
> the GPL, or at least the LGPL, in order for the language in question
> to not become bastardized by some power
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> (Paul says:) "I think the goal should be for Zope and Python to
> converge on the same license, with perhaps the new license being some
> off-the-shelf license like Apache's."
Wow, lobbying the management team at DC is pretty easy ;-).
It's good to s
On 25 Jun 2001, Michael R. Bernstein wrote:
> Other than keeping the door open for this eventuality, is there any
> other reason to choose a BSD style license over the GPL?
Yes. A commercial one; an imperative one. If I make a Zope Python
Product, I must license it as GPL to be able to redistr
(I removed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.)
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Giovanni Maruzzelli wrote:
> Any hints on how to manage something like? We use both textindexes,
> fieldindexes, and keywordsindexes (textindex on string properties,
> fieldindexes on boolean and datetime, keywordindex on strings). Maybe
> on
[Simon Michael]
| Now you're talking. Seconded.
Me too!
And if the management team really needs alot of serious breakdowns as
to why this is a problem (GPL-incompatability, that is) let me know
and I'll drum up a nice little mail of my own. :)
___
Z
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Morten W. Petersen wrote:
> Yes, you can distribute a GPL-compatible licensed code with GPL
> licensed code without licencing the former under GPL. Take a look in
> the Linux-kernel source tree for example.
Ok, good. Then Thingamy's intermediate solution will be to create
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> Now, if the ZPL were GPL compatible, the GPL would be in full effect
> for products. Digital Creations would automatically have the rights
> to redistribute derivatives of ZWiki. I believe DC would even be able
> to distribute ZWiki with Zope as long
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Nils Kassube wrote:
> * Jim Penny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-06-20 19:12]:
>
> > As far as I can tell you are wrong, but there are certainly gray
> > areas. The last time this came up I wrote such a scenario up and
> > tried to get FSF clarification. Nothing ever came bac
On 21 Jun 2001, Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
> if your product derives from GUM or uses internal interfaces, no, you
> can't. if your product uses only well the defined external api or
> access gum through zope, then, imho, yes.
Ok, that's good. Then it means we can potentially use GPL Zope Pyth
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
> You're not allowed to distribute a derived work of GPL code with proprietary
> code incorporated.
Ok, this is the situation. We in Thingamy usually create all our products
under the GPL. Then we give the whole shebang to the client we have been
wor
On 20 Jun 2001, Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
> i am sure that the QPL and the ZPL are completely incompatible but
> nobody cares because nobody really thinks that one is better than the
> other...
I might be misunderstanding here, if that's the case I appologies.
Just to clarify, for us at Thing
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Chris Withers wrote:
> I'm guessing this is the point at which your problems become mine? ;-)
*evil laughter* Yes :-)
We should write about it and publish it to the community...
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Andreas Jung wrote:
> These are good ideas to improve the TextIndex. I already encouraged
> Erik to put alltogether into a Fishbowl proposal,
Which I would do, if I had time. Which I will have, but not for another
two weeks. :-)
___
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> Once you're satisfied with the implementation, would you be willing
> submit the module to the collector?
Do you think you (or someone else for that matter) could have a look at
[1] the method that returns the position in the document - positionInDoc
On Sat, 16 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Lexis-Nexis: Sean w/2 Upton (where w/2 is within 2 words)
This wouldn't be hard to make happen. I don't know if it is better to do
it before of after the parsers, though. Maybe a more userfriendly alias
would be best as a default?
___
y I've only been
testing explicitly with "adjoinedby" in the query) is to insert
"adjoinedby" in phrased searches:
"erik enge"-> erik adjoinedby enge
erik ... enge -> erik near enge
What do you think?
I'll be
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Erik Enge wrote:
> To be really useful I think the PossitionIndex' _proximity dictionary
> needs to be turned into a BTree of some sort, but apart from that I
> don't know what is missing.
It's now using BTrees. And I renamed it to PositionIndex
When writing the PossitionIndex, a bunch of questions arrised (Zope
2.3.2):
This is from UnTextIndex.py Zope 2.3.2 line 250 (or there abouts).
Why is the wordMap needed?
"""
def getEntryForObject(self, rid, default=None):
"""Get all information contained for a specific object.
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> Excellent! I haven't looked at it in detail, but thanks very much for
> contributing it! Maybe we can roll some of this work into a
> position-aware Text Index
It is actually a TextIndex on steoroids. Remove the _proximity attribute
and a couple of
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Erik Enge wrote:
> Me got a patch: http://nittin.net/erik/software/PossitionIndex>.
And I should mention that it has only been tested on Zope 2.3.2.
(BTW, thanks, Chris, for suggesting how to code it.)
___
Zope-Dev ma
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> Hopefully we can graft on real NEAR searching in the future. For now,
> I think "foo AND bar" is about as close as you're going to get to
> phrase searching without post-filtering results.
Me got a patch: http://nittin.net/erik/software/PossitionInd
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Stian Jenssen wrote:
> I wan't to run two webservers on the same machine one, zope/apache an
> one apache. Can I set it up with 2 ports eg. 8080 and 80 but how do I
> do it?
Edit the z2.py file in your zope/ directory, look for HTTP_PORT and adjust
that to your needs.
___
On Sun, 10 Jun 2001, Stephan Richter wrote:
> But, if I try: , then I cannot use
> self.REQUEST, since the namespace is somehow not passed.
Don't you have to use ?
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zop
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Stian Jenssen wrote:
> Hi there!
Hello :)
> I wan't to use php with zope, does anybody know how the header syntax
> shall look like? Tried diffrent syntaxes but i get wierd outputs, not
> as expected.
Try this one: http://www.zope.org/Members/Mamey/PHP>.
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Stephan Richter wrote:
> See an earlier post on a different thread. Chris wrote that the
> license is BSDish and is therefore compatible with ZPL. This means
> that mxDateTime could be distributed with Zope.
Yes, but in the proposal Andreas mentions the GPL, not the ZPL, and
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Andreas Jung wrote:
> Feel free to review and comment the propsal to replace
> the current DateTime module of Zope by the mxDateTime module:
>From the proposal:
"""
License issues
mxDateTime stands under the EGENIX Public License that is considered to be
an Open Source lice
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> It really doesn't matter how many conflicts there are. Within a
> single transaction, 1 conflict is as bad as 100.
Why?
> But I think I have a solution for all of the issues in conflict
> resolution.
Whee!
> If you, or anyone else, is also inter
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Amos Latteier wrote:
> I encourage you to check it out and leave your comments, criticisms, and
> suggestions.
I like. That pretty much captures it :)
There is one thing, though. Let's say I have this class NiceBigCar. The
developers docs from what you suggest are fine,
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Matt Hamilton wrote:
> Out of interest, is this startup time avoided when using BerkeleyDB as
> the storage? I know that it has its own indexes etc. so I am
> wondering if it no longer needs to load an index into memory.
I'm not sure, but as I said in a previous oops-correct
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Magnus Heino (Rivermen) wrote:
> Where can I get PartitionedFileStorage?
Here: http://www.zope.org/Members/hathawsh/PartitionedFileStorage>
Didn't show up in any searches, though. Maybe worth indexing?
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Richard Jones wrote:
> http://www.zope.org/Members/anthony/BarewordExcepts
>
> Feel free to find the bad except: and submit a patch...
Ugh. There are tons of them... I'll see what I have time for.
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Erik Enge wrote:
> I'm running a 1GB Data.fs with CompressedStorage here and that takes
> probably about 3-5 minutes on a 1GHz with 1GB RAM. I keep banging my
> head against it, but it just won't run faster.
Oops, misleading you there. Actually, FileSt
[no cross-posting, please]
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Bjorn Stabell wrote:
> We're planning a Yahoo! Clubs like system that should scale to about
> 30, 000 users. Assuming about 3,000 groups and 20MB per group (group
> functionality includes photo albums), gives a database size of 60GB.
> Assuming on
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ... at least then we know what the exception is.
:
> Again - try that code in an interactive interpreter if you really want to
> find out what's going on...
Yeah, thanks, that would work as a workaround, but isn't this buggish
behaviour?
_
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Erik Enge wrote:
> I'll try to do an hour or so of analysing this tomorrow, and I'll get back
> to you. :-)
Well, now we all know what vikings believe "an hour or so" mean, don't we?
I figured it out, I think. Let's say I have the
Hi,
sorry I can't test this myself. I get this behaviour in 2.3.2, and I find
it strange. I'd classify it as a bug.
If I pass this query to a TextIndex:
(word1 OR word2) AND (word3)
it is first translated to this:
[['word1', 'or', 'word2'], 'and', ['word3']]
which is fine. But then,
On Thu, 31 May 2001, Brian Lloyd wrote:
> Zope 2.4.0 alpha 1 has been released - you can download it from
> Zope.org:
Cool stuff.
I have a couple of comments, though. For future ref., should I post them
to the Collector?
- lib/python/Products/PluginIndexes/__init__.py is missing the ZPL
- wh
On 31 May 2001, Ty Sarna wrote:
> Zope basically uses whatever object custom_zodb.Storage is as the
> storage.
Ahh... I can feel the zen pouring over me :)
> What you want to do is create a FileStorage, and wrap it with a
> CompressedStorage and use that. Your custom_zodb.py would look like:
Hi,
has anyone given this a good run? I'm a bit confused as to how to make it
work. Do I just subclass it in FileStorage? Will it work with existing
Data.fs or do I need to start anew, so to speak?
Thanks.
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Thu, 31 May 2001, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> How did you miss the point? That's exactly the point! :-)
Oh :)
> Right now ZCatalog randomly generates ConflictErrors even if there are
> no conflicts in the data being indexed.
This is why I think I've missed a/the point: wouldn't it be better t
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> I have written a proposal.
So, if I understand correctly, when this is implemented, will the ZCatalog
always resolve conflicts and never raise ConflictErrors? If there are no
ConflictErrors in the main object system?
I think I'm missing the point he
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> Thanks for tracking this down...
No worries :)
> If you're so inclined, please put this in the Collector [...] so it
> doesn't get dropped on the floor.
Done: http://classic.zope.org:8080/Collector/2262/view/>
___
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Erik Enge wrote:
> I'm going bug hunting...
I'm back :)
I think I found the bug. In lib/python/SearchIndex/GlobbingLexicon.py in
the query_hook() method. It seems to say that: "if I can't find a '*' or
a '?' in the word, the
On Tue, 29 May 2001, Michel Pelletier wrote:
> Must be ZCatalog's. I'm guessing the paren matching takes a different
> code path that doesn't expand wildcards.
I'm going bug hunting...
If I'm not back in five minutes... just wait longer. (Ace Ventura)
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Michel Pelletier wrote:
> I don't think you are using a globbing vocabulary.
I think I am:
>>> print_info(applic.Catalog(word='scripto*'))
unsplitted ['scripto*']
unl: ['scripto*']
unq: [104623, 'or', 112198, 'or', 151568]
Length: 6
Content: [, , , , , ]
>>> print_info(appl
e that word anywhere?
I tried searching for:
eri
and that gave me four results. No globbing, then?
> Then again, where did you get these objects? If you were looking at the
> wrong point in the code, the wildcards may not have been expanded yet.
Could be it...
> >
>
nd', ['enge']]
And the latter one:
[['erik'], 'and', ['eng?']]
This:
(erik ... enge)
turned in to:
[['erik', '...', 'enge']]
and returned one (correct) result. Although, I recall seeing something
like this:
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Casey Duncan wrote:
> Works great for me. Perhaps you are using a Vocabulary that has
> Globbing turned off?
I'm not sure, how do I check?
This query works:
wil?car*
This doesn't:
(wil?car* or something else) and (word1 and word2)
I can't see that the qu
Hi,
is it me, or is this just not working:
(word1 or word*) and (wor?3)
ie. wildcards in TextIndex queries. I can't seem to make it work, and I'm
not able to track down where it stops working. Should it work in the
first place?
Zope 2.3.2
Thanks.
__
On Sat, 19 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> 8 words. Not characters. But actually I just looked at the source
> and it's not even that. It's treated essentially as an AND query,
> because the UnTextIndex code doesn't store any proximity information
> between words. ( I knew this once, but I
On Sat, 19 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> I believe it means within 8 words in the current implementation...
So, "word1 NEAR wordlongerthan8characters" wouldn't come up with
anything? Or is it number of characters inbetween?
> > Is it in line for 2.4?
>
> No, unfortunately. I'm not sure
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> You should be able to do this with quotes around the words, but that
> feature is sort of only half-wired-up at this point. [snip] Currently,
> quotes around word do the same thing as parens around words (word1
> NEAR word2). Sigh.
What does NEAR me
Hiya,
it basically says it in the subject. How can I search for "word1
word2" without ZCatalog/TextIndex interpreting it as "word1" or/and
"word2"?
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cr
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> Well, that's good, except I thought you couldn't get rid of objects?
Muhahaha. I got those little bastards... :)
> Yes, but not with 1,000,000 objects (see
> lib/python/ZCatalog/tests/testCatalog.py). It would be nice to have
> such a report.
If
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> I'd be curious to know how long a query that involves only a single
> field index takes, and how long a query that involves only a single text
> index takes... does each take a roughly equivalent amount of time?
I might be able to check that for you
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> I'll be curious to see the results. Hopefully you'll have better luck
> under 2.3.1b2.
I've indexed about 410.000 objects now. A plain query with 'meta_type'
and 'firstname' to searchResults takes about 3-4 seconds. Not too bad,
but not that good
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> YourCatalog.catalog_object(newobject)
>
> as opposed from inheriting from CatalogAware and relying on manage_afterAdd
> or calling object.index_item() manually. That's really it.
Well, if you put it that way :)
*removing CatalogAwareness*
> (it'
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> Why CatalogAware? You do know that the only thing CatalogAware does
> is add/remove/reindex objects in one particular Catalog when they're
> added, removed, or changed?
Yes, and this is all I need. Where is the overhead with CatalogAware
objects, t
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> Probably not much difference on bare bulk indexing speed, but I'll bet
> that it finishes this time. ;-)
We'll see :)
> I'd either make my own CatalogAware-alike mixin class that did things
> a bit differently than CatalogAware (perhaps didn't inde
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Chris Withers wrote:
> Why nto go for 2.3.2 final? IIRC, 2.3.2b2 had some nasty ZCatalog bugs
> in it...
Heh, that's what I get for not keeping up; I didn't even know 2.3.2 final
was out. Bleh. :-)
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EM
Thanks for the fast reply!
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Chris McDonough wrote:
> Have you read
> http://www.zope.org/Members/mcdonc/HowTos/UpgradeToNewCatalog/index_html
> ? I suspect there will be improvement.
Surely there will be improvement, but not of factors two or three, or
more?
And, I can do t
Hi.
I was adding a couple of objects to my system. Turns out, it's over a
million of them. I have a 1GHz Pentium with 1GB RAM and 1GB swap. After
I added all the objects with a little script (that took about 12 hours), I
was going to index them to the Catalog I have. (I had to uncomment the
in
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Very strange!
Indeed.
> Did you look in the log files? Have their been any core dumps?
I'll try to do an hour or so of analysing this tomorrow, and I'll get back
to you. :-)
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Chris Withers wrote:
> Well, I thought the upgrade to 2.3.2b2 would solve the problem but it
> hasn't :-( I have a (very important :-S) Zope instance which hangs at
> what seems like the slightest touch.
Maybe I can help.
I've seen similar behaviour, and by some chance I di
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Chris Withers wrote:
> Erik Enge wrote:
> >
> > I'm using Zope 2.3.1b1 so that shouldn't be a problem?
>
> Yes, it will be. [...]
So the "bug" in Zope 2.3.1b1 which makes the ZODB
1 - 100 of 188 matches
Mail list logo
