Hi, all...
Here's the function: (Thanks, Dan...)
script type=text/javascript
function superCoolValidator(value,element,params) {
if(isNaN(parseInt(value.replace(/[\$\,\.]/,{
return false;
}else{
Well, it looks like I'm making progress...
I needed to change
if ( isNaN ( parseInt ( value.replace ( /[\$\,\.]/,
to
if ( isNaN ( value.replace ( /[\$\,\.]/, )))
because I don't want to parse what's left. If there's anything
besides digits, dollar signs, commas, and periods in the
. If it fails,
it will return NaN (Not a Number).
On 4/10/07, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, it looks like I'm making progress...
I needed to change
if ( isNaN ( parseInt ( value.replace ( /[\$\,\.]/,
to
if ( isNaN ( value.replace ( /[\$\,\.]/, )))
because I don't want
Good morning, all...
I'm trying to implement validation using Jorn's Validation plug-in
and every time I click into a form field, then click out, IE 7 locks up.
Everything is working fine in FF (except the Submit button, but that's
an issue for later...)
Does anyone see anything wrong in the
Commenting out the blur line does prevent IE from locking up.
(Why doesn't this happen in FF?), but then, of course, no validation occurs.
When I change blur to keyup everything seems to work fine.
What's up with that? Keyup is fine, but I prefer to allow users a little
more
time to correct
Hi, all...
Well... I went to demo a page containing a form with
Jorn's Validation plug-in today and as soon as I caused
what should have been an error message to pop up
above the form field, I get Google can fill in this form field for you...
Aaaah!
Has anyone found a way to keep the
)... not very nice for non-js users but it's
the only way I ever got around it!
On 4/12/07, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, all...
Well... I went to demo a page containing a form with
Jorn's Validation plug-in today and as soon as I caused
what should have been an error message to pop up
messing
with the element's title attribute.
On 4/12/07, Aaron Heimlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/12/07, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using the Name attribute and the same value
is used for each input for its ID.
I'm doing the same thing, i.e:
input type=text name=email id=email
mentioned above. There is a
Google Group for Google Toolbar IE[1], though, so can bring this issue up
there too.
[1] http://groups.google.com/group/IEToolbar-Group
On 4/12/07, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I realized after I posted that what is being replaced on the page
Thanks, Jorn! :o)
Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jörn Zaefferer
Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2007 6:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Google Toolbar Messages Strike Again!
Rick Faircloth schrieb:
Flip-flopping
I'm still trying to figure out why this code runs well
on FF, but not on IE when using blur...Jorn, anybody else have any ideas?
IE just locks up every time I click in one field, then in another.
I've used keyup instead of blur and it works, but I'd really prefer
blur.
Thanks,
Rick
.
On Apr 16, 9:42 am, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, all...
Will the onInvalid and onValid lines in the code below work
to enable disable a submit button?
Rick
$(document).ready(function(){
onInvalid: function(form) {
$(form).find([EMAIL PROTECTED
object from the
server that contained a boolean in addition to your text. Structures
and JSON/WDDX work well for that kind of thing. You would then use
the boolean to trigger an if () statement. I
On Apr 16, 6:19 pm, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why are you declaring functions
Thanks for the test!
Rick
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of limodou
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 10:58 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Will this code enable disable a submit button?
On 4/17/07, Rick
);
} else {
(input:submit).attr(disabled,disabled);
}
$(#Result).empty().append(obj.myHTMLFromColdFusion);
}
More info here:
http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/7/htmldocs/1523.htm#1207113
On Apr 16, 7:48 pm, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You would probably
Hi, Dan... and thanks for the feedback...
What I would like to do is allow ColdFusion server-side
validation messages to be delivered back to the form page
via Ajax if JS is available and, if not, just refresh the page.
Isn't that what you do with this code is your
won't be
changed.
HTH,
rob
On 4/20/07, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good morning, all...
Is there a fool-proof way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled in their browser?
Rick
--
Rob Desbois
Eml: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 01452 760631
Mob: 07946 705987
There's a whale
.
This is the *only* surefire way of ensuring that browsers that have JS
disabled will work properly on your site. Otherwise, its a shot in the dark.
Rey...
Rick Faircloth wrote:
That's what's motivating the question.
I'm trying to take Progressive Enhancement, as I see it,
one step further
That page has no AJAX based validation. I also do no JS detection. The
code
is set up so that if JS is unavailable, the form just works.
I got that, but the code seems to test for Ajax availability, and if there's
been an
Ajax call, it responds with messages via Ajax.
If the call was not via
Thanks for pointing that out, Andy.
That's important for me to know, because I not
only design and develop sites for clients, more and more
are asking me to perform SEO/SEM for them and I don't
want to hurt their rankings, for sure!
Rick
-Original Message-
From:
, 2007 11:50 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?
Rick Faircloth wrote:
The simplest
thing is just to add a post parameter that says ajaxOn=true or some
such, then check for that server-side. It wasn't included
Gotcha...
(Hopefully it's compatible with CF 4.5!)
Your approach looks like what Dan did in his presentation code:
cfif structKeyExists(url, ajax) and url.ajax
Checking for the ajax variable in the url struct... at least that's how
I'm understand it...
-Original Message-
From:
?
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 12:00 PM
(Hopefully it's compatible with CF 4.5!)
Unfortunately it looks like it was introduced in v5:
http://www.actcfug.com/files/cfmlhistory/functions/gethttprequestdata.ht
m
You
--
/form
/html
For the form is initially hidden thing, you could use JavaScript to hide
the form in a $(document).ready() function. That way people without JS see
the form, and people with JS see what you originally wanted them to.
On 4/20/07, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Waiting
] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?
On 4/20/07, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$(document).ready()(function { \n
Should be:
$(document).ready(function() {
// stuff goes here...
});
--
Aaron Heimlich
Web Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
there might be something that's
usually wrong when this pops up.
Rick
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Faircloth
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 4:09 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled
has Javascript
enabled?
On 4/20/07, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The XML file does not appear to have any style information
associated with it. The document tree is shown below.
This is what FireFOX (not Firebug) does when you browse to an XML file that
isn't using any XSLT stylesheets
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Faircloth
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 6:55 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?
Thanks for the feedback, Aaron. I'm trying to integrate
the whole validation scheme into one page
(CalcTest.cfm,
Params); ),
then the body, including the form (no submit button, everything is
posted on blur)
/BODY
/HTML
/CFIF
[1]
http://download.macromedia.com/pub/documentation/en/coldfusion/452/45langref
.pdf
On 4/20/07, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Hi, Dan...
The only reason I'm interested in being able to determine
whether or not JS is enabled is that I'm trying to use JS
to place error messages back on a page via JS (Ajax)
after server-side validation.
What I'm trying to determine now that I've been working on
this approach
Actually, I'm not trying to do just client-side validation... I've already
got that working by itself. And I've got server-side working...been doing
that
for years. Now, I'm trying to combine the two and run the client-side
validation,
then run the server-side validation and if there are any
Hi, all... the saga continues...
I'm so close, yet so far.
I think the problem is doc-type declarations.
No matter what I do, it creates one problem or another.
Now, as it is, the server-side works fine, but the client-side
is disabled.
Would someone please look at the attached code and
tell
Hi, all... the saga continues...
I'm so close, yet so far.
I think the problem is doc-type declarations.
No matter what I do, it creates one problem or another.
Now, as it is, the server-side works fine, but the client-side
is disabled.
Would someone please look at the attached code and
tell
Testing...
Thanks for the tip, Ariel.. I'll give that try!
Rick
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ariel Jakobovits
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 8:18 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to determine if a user has
want you to be successful, I highly recommend that
you follow their suggestions.
This is the *only* surefire way of ensuring that browsers
that have JS disabled will work properly on your site.
Otherwise, its a shot in the dark.
Rey...
Rick Faircloth wrote:
That's what's motivating
to determine if a user has Javascript
enabled?
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, if JS isn't working, the details for every row in
the calendar
will be showing and that's a no go. Perhaps there is a way
to cause the
calendar to default
if a user has Javascript
enabled?
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wait, I see what you're saying... the same link would serve both
JS and non-JS users. How would a link that would work for both
situations be coded?
Seems like you could have two different
Took me awhile to fined the “lable” error!
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Alexandre Plennevaux
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 12:03 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] interface / tooltip / Demo error
Just would like to inform the
Using the iframe was a very good way to solve the jumpiness
of showing and hiding table rows.
I'm just about to implement a calendar using rows with slide
down details and this is better than the solution I can up with
to make things smooth!
Excellent!
Rick
-Original Message-
From:
Hi, all...
Well, I've finally given in and after 10 years of web design,
I'm ready to create my *first* horizontal menus.
I've always used vertical menus because of their expandability,
but I need some design flexibility.
So the question is... what's the best way to build a horizontal
menu
] On
Behalf Of Olaf Bosch
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 2:44 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to do horizontal sub-menus...
Rick Faircloth schrieb:
Well, I've finally given in and after 10 years of web design,
I'm ready to create my *first* horizontal menus.
What
the submenu via css?
Rick
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Olaf Bosch
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 2:44 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best way to do horizontal sub-menus...
Rick Faircloth schrieb:
Well, I've
version, which I've not used:
http://www.twinhelix.com/dhtml/fsmenu/
~ ~ Dave
Rick Faircloth wrote:
Hi, again, Olaf...
Both of the approaches you mentioned get me started with some
coding ideas, but both utilize drop-down submenus.
What I'm after is a first-level horizontal menu
Hi, all...
I'm dipping my toes into the water of horizontal menus for the first time.
I've got some same html I'm using for the menus, but now I need to be
able to dynamically change the selected class for the ul's and li's in
use.
ul id=maintab
li class=selecteda href=#Home/a/li
lia
To show you what I'm really after, visit
http://www.stonebriar.org.
Click on the Worship link and then the Choirs link.
That's the kind of sub-menu I'm after, and also the behavior
that causes the selected links to remain highlighted.
Rick
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL
Well. one thing I would like to change about the Stonebriar
menu is to have the sub-menu change with a mouseover of the
main menu links. Currently the sub-menu only changes when a main
menu link is clicked.
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Faircloth
Let's hope so. I want him to be in business
when I need him. I'm getting up in age, you know. ;o)
Rick
PS - I didn't know xml files had colons!
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sean Catchpole
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 12:38 PM
To:
-menus...
There is already a jQuery plugin for what you are looking for. Take a look
at http://menu.n2cms.com/
It's not perfect, but it's a good place to start.
Rick Faircloth wrote:
Hi, all...
Well, I've finally given in and after 10 years of web design,
I'm ready to create my *first
not perfect, but it's a good place to start.
Rick Faircloth wrote:
Hi, all...
Well, I've finally given in and after 10 years of web design,
I'm ready to create my *first* horizontal menus.
I've always used vertical menus because of their expandability,
but I need some design flexibility.
So
Hi, all...
I'm using the Eyecon Interface Slideshow plug-in.
I'm using it simply to display images that fade one to another
without wanting the user to click any links or control the images.
I'm trying to remove the image links: 123456, but when I remove
the options (and these are options), I
/6/4, Rick Faircloth mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi, all...
I'm using the Eyecon Interface Slideshow plug-in.
I'm using it simply to display images that fade one to another
without wanting the user to click any links or control the images.
I'm trying to remove the image links
I don't know who created the site, but it is *very* nice-looking and
well laid out.
I also noticed (and perhaps this is jQuery at work) how the Latest
Questions and Answers
and Latest Groups continue to display a new item at the top of each list
while the others
move down... very slick.
Rick
I'm not getting that from AVG...
Rick
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Liam Byrne
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 8:27 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] AVG - Trojan Horse JS/Uniz.B ?
AVG is currently reporting
Looks great, GC!
One question (or suggestion)...
Could the numbers representing the photos be changed to tiny
thumbnails so there would be visual reference?
Rick
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of GianCarlo Mingati
Sent:
I noticed that the example runs in DOM mode
anytime, but CSS mode will only run if the page
is refreshed and CSS is tried first.
After DOM mode has run, CSS no longer works.
And is the effect supposed to be a total fade out and in,
or is it supposed to be like a streak of light passing
over the
That's where I've seen that design before! I knew I recognized
it from somewhere! Devo!
Good call, Mika...
Rick
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mika Tuupola
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2007 1:28 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
I know this may sound goofy as a solution, but when I first starting
working jQuery, one of the first things I tried to do was slide a table row.
As you said, Glen, it's not a pretty sight. I tried something a little more
radical. I use separate *tables* for each row with each table
Oops. the URL should be:
http://ha2.whitestonemedia.com/cfm/church_calendar.cfm
Sorry.
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Faircloth
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 9:23 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Effect - Slide Up/Down
.
--Karl
_
Karl Swedberg
www.englishrules.com
www.learningjquery.com
On Jul 20, 2007, at 9:31 PM, Rick Faircloth wrote:
Oops. the URL should be:
http://ha2.whitestonemedia.com/cfm/church_calendar.cfm
http://ha2.whitestonemedia.com/cfm/church_calendar.cfm
Sorry
simply write bug free code!
Sure that's the easiest way. I don't even have to debug in Firebug, because
all my code is perfect the first time! I found that even checking for the
*remote* possibility of errors to be counter-productive! :oP
Rick
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Hi, Glen.
I like the fact that the image shows up in the center of the window
no matter where the thumbnail is located.
One issue I'm going to have with some of my work is when I use
the function/plug-in to display photos that I sell. Currently, that's the
biggest use. The function I
worrying about this ajaxexperience
presentation, is to start over and make it work (evewn in a procuderal way.
Glen
On 7/27/07, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Glen.
I like the fact that the image shows up in the center of the window
no matter where the thumbnail is located
@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Scott Sauyet
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 2:09 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Best Plug-in For Mouse-over show larger image
function
Rick Faircloth wrote:
Do you think you'd be able to make it impossible for
someone
Rick Faircloth wrote:
Do you think you'd be able to make it impossible for
someone to right-click the image and save or print it?
It's possible to make it slightly more difficult, but you can never make
it really hard, and certainly can't make it impossible. If you put them
out so
www.englishrules.com
www.learningjquery.com
On Jul 27, 2007, at 3:12 PM, Rick Faircloth wrote:
Disabling the right click would help, but, as a solution
by itself, it would require users to view photos individually.
I prefer to provide them a page full of thumbnails that they can
On Jul 27, 2007, at 4:34 PM, Rick Faircloth wrote:
Thanks for the tip, Karl.
Are you referring to the non-link element, custom attribute
example on the second page you linked below?
This one:
non-link element, custom attribute: $('h4').cluetip({attribute: 'id',
hoverClass
Sounds good to me!
One rendering environment to rule them all!
Rick
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Glen Lipka
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 9:33 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] OT: A Big Idea
AjaxExperience was a
-ins?
On Jul 28, 3:11 am, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does everyone do to stay updated with the latest jQuery and plug-ins
for every website?
Once you have a site working with your copy of jQ, there is no reason
to update it unless you find that it has a new feature you need
: Saturday, July 28, 2007 10:16 AM
To: jQuery (English)
Subject: [jQuery] Re: How does everyone handle the constant updating of
jQuery and plug-ins?
On Jul 28, 3:06 pm, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We need some kind of system where plug-ins are tested and deemed
compatible
the
official plugins, we need to continue to rely on the plugin authors and
the community to test things out. With so many plugins in the repo, its
just too big of a task to test all of them out.
Rey...
Rick Faircloth wrote:
We need some kind of system where plug-ins are tested and deemed
John, et al...
I think there should definitely be a place for community comment,
but I wouldn't want that to be the final word on whether jQ versions,
plug-in versions, and various browsers and versions work together or not.
Anecdotal evidence has its place, but with only limited authority.
The
participation will help
significantly, and tools around that are essential.
Would you, or anyone else, be interested in helping us build tools to
make this happen? Because having a paid forum or paid plugins
repository is not the right solution.
--John
On 7/28/07, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED
John, you just mentioned a situation that I was trying to address
with a paid subscription service.
we've got Mike maintaining the Project/Plugin system, and he's already
stretched pretty thin
If Mike were being paid for his time, would he be less stretched and
able to work more on the
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: How does everyone handle the constant updating of
jQuery and plug-ins?
On Jul 28, 2007, at 6:03 PM, Rick Faircloth wrote:
I certainly wouldn't have any objection to paying a
subscription fee, let's say $10 per month, for access to a metadata site
www.englishrules.com
www.learningjquery.com
On Jul 28, 2007, at 10:07 PM, Rick Faircloth wrote:
What controls the direction a ClueTip shows from the link?
I put a div on a page with an image inside that has a link.
The ClueTip content is a larger image.
Its working fine
this that can help me make the plugin better.
--Karl
_
Karl Swedberg
www.englishrules.com
www.learningjquery.com
On Jul 28, 2007, at 10:07 PM, Rick Faircloth wrote:
What controls the direction a ClueTip shows from the link?
I put a div on a page
www.englishrules.com
www.learningjquery.com
On Jul 28, 2007, at 10:07 PM, Rick Faircloth wrote:
What controls the direction a ClueTip shows from the link?
I put a div on a page with an image inside that has a link.
The ClueTip content is a larger image.
Its working fine, except
sticky) as
the link would be unhovered by the tip contents, making the tip close,
which would then make the link hovered again, etc. etc. Any thoughts?
--Karl
_
Karl Swedberg
www.englishrules.com
www.learningjquery.com
On Jul 29, 2007, at 12:22 AM, Rick Faircloth
_
Karl Swedberg
www.englishrules.com
www.learningjquery.com
On Jul 29, 2007, at 12:22 AM, Rick Faircloth wrote:
Hi, Karl. thanks for the reply.
I figured out the problem. nothing's broken.
I just had the width of the tip still set to the default 275.
Once I reset
The system I was thinking about wouldn't exclude any of the
core team or plug-in authors from receiving fees.
I didn't get into the details of it, but plug-in authors
who maintained their plug-ins, tutorials, documentation, and
metadata would receive part of the fees for their work.
An
, July 29, 2007 1:21 PM
To: jQuery (English)
Subject: [jQuery] Re: How does everyone handle the constant updating of
jQuery and plug-ins?
On Jul 29, 6:49 pm, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An equitable system would have to be worked out, but no one
who contributes would have been excluded
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Karl Swedberg
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 12:55 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: ClueTip Issue: I can only get the tip to display to
the right...
On Jul 29, 2007, at 12:40 AM, Rick Faircloth wrote:
If you look at my demo page again:
http
To: jQuery (English)
Subject: [jQuery] Re: How does everyone handle the constant updating of
jQuery and plug-ins?
On Jul 29, 6:49 pm, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An equitable system would have to be worked out, but no one
who contributes would have been excluded...
The Debian team
] Re: How does everyone handle the constant updating of
jQuery and plug-ins?
On Jul 29, 8:19 pm, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you know of a similar situation like what we've been
discussing where a subscription service or something similar
was successfully implemented?
Now that you
PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: ClueTip Issue: I can only get the tip to display to
the right...
Hi Rick,
On Jul 29, 2007, at 2:39 PM, Rick Faircloth wrote:
Is there a way to turn off the question mark that appear on mouse-over of a
cluetip?
Now
IIRC, I had to put the innerfade code block in its own
document-ready wrapper before it would activate.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Foyster
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 9:13 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
again. I've tried a few different combinations of
doc-ready blocks etc, and can't seem to get anything to work.
The site is available on the internet if that would help?
Tom.
Rick Faircloth wrote:
IIRC, I had to put the innerfade code block in its own
document-ready wrapper before it would
If all accessibility options were still available (and perhaps enhanced
because
producers could spend more time on that instead of browser issues), and all
other expected browsers functions were still available, like controlling
cookies,
turning js on or off, etc., I would think users wouldn't
Great job, Mike... I'm sure this will be a very
useful and often used plugin!
Rick
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike
Alsup
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 8:56 AM
To: jQuery Discussion
Subject: [jQuery] Cycle Plugin update
Very nice, Diego!
Rick
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Diego A.
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 9:18 AM
To: jQuery (English)
Subject: [jQuery] jQuery Multiple Upload Plugin v1.23
Just quick a message to anyone using the jQuery
One of the aspects of your plug-in offering to the community,
Mike, is the good documentation and, especially, demos for beginner,
intermediate, and advanced users.
That approach to documentation, usage, and demos will help bring
many new people into the jQuery fold.
Plug-in developers take
This type of work needs to go in a demo section on the jQuery site!
Yes. along with documentation, code, and demos of the Alsup variety.
Rick
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brandon Aaron
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 12:00 PM
To:
The ability scroll around a highly detailed image would be a valuable
feature
for anyone wanting to sell a product, such as shoes, clothing or electronics
so they can take a very close look at the stitching or controls, etc.
I was wondering if there is any limit to the size photo that can be
.
On 8/24/07, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ability scroll around a highly detailed image would be a valuable
feature
for anyone wanting to sell a product, such as shoes, clothing or electronics
so they can take a very close look at the stitching or controls, etc.
I was wondering
: [ANNOUNCEMENT] jqGalView (yet another image gallery)
Yes, that is what I meant.
On 8/24/07, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That will be great when you finish it! (But since it will accept
larger images now, it seems usable for that purpose to me.)
By loader, do you mean
@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] jqGalView (yet another image gallery)
Waits till it is click; at that point I should have put a loading icon
(think thickbox) in there. I will try to do that tonight if that is
something you need.
On 8/24/07, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL
I've got to say. this has been one weird thread to find. almost
like a soap opera.
Anyway, Glen, did you ever get clarification on the question you posed
below?
Is there a recommendation going around that js scripts should be placed as
late
in the body as possible?
Rick
From:
Hey, Karl. so you did get the positioning setup where the clueTip will
display
to the top or bottom of the mouse-over element if the clueTip is too wide
to fully display on the right or left of the element?
As far as positioning to the top, right, bottom, or left goes, I hope that's
Very nice!
Where do I find everything I need to implement this?
Or is everything in the source of the page?
Rick
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of gianiaz
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 12:18 PM
To: jQuery (English)
Subject:
1 - 100 of 861 matches
Mail list logo
