Great presentation Eugene!
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 4:13 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
Over two weeks ago, I had the amazing opportunity to attend Wikimania 2014
in London. Wikimania is the annual conference for the Wikimedia movement,
which includes the
Eugene, Brilliant, Absolutely well done... What a great experience for you
and to showcase OSM, Wikimedia from a PH perspective ..
Congratulations ..
Regards
Mark Cupitt
If we change the world, let it bear the mark of our intelligence
Hire Me on Freelancer
See me on Open StreetMap
Hi everyone,
The main OSM website will have a routing feature (tab) soon. But before the
developers deploy that, they would like everyone to test it first.
Please see the forwarded email below.
Happy testing!
~Eugene
-- Forwarded message --
From: Paul Norman penor...@mac.com
2014-08-28 0:08 GMT+02:00 Simon Poole si...@poole.ch:
Given that Edward has written code that, as it seems, accurately
determines the corresponding wikidata objects for a given OSM entity,
I'm not quite clear on what the benefits of statically tagging the
references on OSM objects is
There is currently a pull request up for adding routing to
OpenStreetMap.org which could use another check over for bugs. A demo
instance is running at http://jsrouting.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/.
Although bug reports are needed, requests to expand the scope or
redesign the UI are unlikely
Jo, I believe you are thinking too far and I suspect of use cases that
don't actually exist for the wikidata tag itself, for the *:wikidata
tags perhaps.
The wikidata tag gives a one to one mapping between an OSM object and
its wikidata entry (I know that this is a bit of a simplification in
that
On 28 August 2014 09:09, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote:
What you do avoid by not tagging in OSM is
maintenance (given that OSM objects are not
necessarily a persistent reference to a single real
world entity).
Very few Wikidata IDs will change (far fewer than Wikipedia article
names, for
I think it's useful to be able to query all streets named after a certain
poet or celebrity. I did the exercise for Father Damien and Guido Gezelle
and it's not possible to simply query for Gezelle and obtain the same
result.
You are right in that this is a query on name:etymology:wikidata and.
Hi,
noticed that there is
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:maxspeed%3D20redirect=no
and a few more speeds - does it make any sense to have such
pages around?
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On 2014-08-28 12:10, Richard Z. wrote:
Hi,
noticed that there is
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:maxspeed%3D20redirect=no
and a few more speeds - does it make any sense to have such
pages around?
If you take a look at the what links here link from the wiki you'll
see
Am 28.08.2014 11:17, schrieb Andy Mabbett:
On 28 August 2014 09:09, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote:
What you do avoid by not tagging in OSM is
maintenance (given that OSM objects are not
necessarily a persistent reference to a single real
world entity).
Very few Wikidata IDs will
On Do, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:20:56 +0200, Maarten Deen wrote:
On 2014-08-28 12:10, Richard Z. wrote:
Hi,
noticed that there is
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:maxspeed%3D20redirect=no
and a few more speeds - does it make any sense to have such
pages around?
If you
On 2014-08-28 11:20, Maarten Deen wrote:
On 2014-08-28 12:10, Richard Z. wrote:
Hi,
noticed that there is
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:maxspeed%3D20redirect=no
and a few more speeds - does it make any sense to have such
pages around?
If you take a look at the what
Hi,
trying to clean up bridge=swing as far as possible. There was at least
user in the past who used the combination systematically wrong, so I want
to split the result by user who introduced the bridge=swing.
To make things complicated - a few days ago one contributor did a well
meant effort
On 27/08/2014 22:15, Andy Mabbett wrote:
What, again? ;-)
You've been beating the drum for wikidata for a while, but that's
mostly been on the GB list or even more locally. I definitely think
that it's worth explaining the benefits on talk@.
For example:
Wikidata has data on each of
2014-08-28 12:10 GMT+02:00 Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com:
Hi,
noticed that there is
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:maxspeed%3D20redirect=no
and a few more speeds - does it make any sense to have such
pages around?
Richard
There's one fundamental question about wikidata tags; how do you tag
multiple objects that have the same wikidata tag? For example, a wikidata
entry about a church and a connected monastery. When I was writing the
Wikidata proposal on our wiki, I've put a rule that only one object in OSM
can have
On Do, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:35:59 +0100, Craig Wallace wrote:
On 2014-08-28 11:20, Maarten Deen wrote:
On 2014-08-28 12:10, Richard Z. wrote:
Hi,
noticed that there is
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:maxspeed%3D20redirect=no
and a few more speeds - does it make any
On Do, Aug 28, 2014 at 01:23:21 +0200, Janko Mihelić wrote:
There's one fundamental question about wikidata tags; how do you tag
multiple objects that have the same wikidata tag? For example, a wikidata
entry about a church and a connected monastery. When I was writing the
Wikidata proposal on
On 28 August 2014 12:04, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
On 27/08/2014 22:15, Andy Mabbett wrote:
Wikidata has data on each of these entities which either
isn't in OSM (who's the mayor of this town/ vicar of this church?)
OK - not sure how that's a benefit to OSM as such,
Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote:
There's one fundamental question about wikidata tags; how do you tag
multiple objects that have the same wikidata tag? For example, a wikidata
entry about a church and a connected monastery. When I was writing the
Wikidata proposal on our wiki, I've put a
On 28 August 2014 12:23, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem with putting wikidata=* on several objects is
that people could come to an idea to put wikidata=Q3947
(entry about houses) on all houses, or wikidata=12280 on
all bridges.
Jochen has already answered that well, but we
The problem behind this is that there is no way to mark the reason why there is
a redirect.
Well, there is a little trick ;)
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:amenity%3Dalmaction=edit
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/amenity=alm#wiki
__
2014-08-28 14:41 GMT+02:00 Edward Betts edw...@4angle.com:
For now I've side stepped this problem. If you look at an institution like
a
hospital, university or school you'll often find multiple buildings, some
might include a name and be tagged amenity=hospital/university/school. If
my
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
OK - not sure how that's a benefit to OSM as such, though
I'm sure people could do useful unexpected things with
those links.
That's the point - the benefit is to OSM's users, whcih in turn
benefits OSM in the
On 08/27/2014 12:47 PM, Edward Betts wrote:
I'd like to annotate these 70k objects in OSM with a Wikidata tag
automatically.
I like the sound of this. Personally, I think it adds value, and having
looked at the code your matching criteria sound good.
There are a couple of things it would
For the impatient having red/cyan 3D glasses, first stop is :
http://tile.openstreetmap.fr/~cquest/leaflet/4d.html
otherwise:
https://cquest.hackpad.com/OpenStreetMap-goes-in-the-4th-dimension--ju3XWhj2qAV
Have fun ! (OSM's second law)
--
Christian Quest - OpenStreetMap France
Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote:
Bridges are bit of a grey area, is a highway with bridge=yes really a
bridge, or is it a highway which has a property of being on a bridge? I
think we should map these notable bridges as an area with man_made=bridge
and put the tag on that.
The very first
Hi all,
I created a new challenge for MapRoulette: Fix waterway direction.
As the waterway's direction in OSM denotes the direction of the water's
flow, I started to compare them to SRTM. This leads to more than 1
million wrong directions for Europe only. Many times SRTM is right,
however, due
On Thursday 28 August 2014, Peter Barth wrote:
Hi all,
I created a new challenge for MapRoulette: Fix waterway direction.
As the waterway's direction in OSM denotes the direction of the
water's flow, I started to compare them to SRTM. This leads to more
than 1 million wrong directions for
Hi,
Christoph Hormann schrieb:
Great to see the waterways are getting some attention. Does this only
analyze SRTM elevations at start and end point or are the surrounding
waterways considered?
currently start and end point only. I have code to do more, but for the
easy tasks that was not
On 28/08/2014 19:49, Peter Barth wrote:
A more detailed description can also be found on my user diary here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Peda/diary/23632
Your statement that canals may flow uphill is incorrect. Where canals
pass over a summit, the water supply is fed into the topmost
On Thursday 28 August 2014, Peter Barth wrote:
]...] But as I'd
like to get a mostly complete waternetwork for another project, I'm
planning on extending the challenge at some point.
If you are hoping for a complete network right from the OSM database
without post processing you have a long
Am 28.08.2014 um 21:48 schrieb Peter Barth:
Hi,
Christoph Hormann schrieb:
Great to see the waterways are getting some attention. Does this only
analyze SRTM elevations at start and end point or are the surrounding
waterways considered?
currently start and end point only. I have code
2014-08-28 19:34 GMT+02:00 Christian Quest cqu...@openstreetmap.fr:
For the impatient having red/cyan 3D glasses, first stop is :
http://tile.openstreetmap.fr/~cquest/leaflet/4d.html
otherwise:
https://cquest.hackpad.com/OpenStreetMap-goes-in-the-4th-dimension--ju3XWhj2qAV
You, sir, are a
Well, you should at least take preference to man_made=bridge[1] if there is
any. Highways can be split, just like in my example, and then that looks as
if there are two bridges. What if there is a footway running besides the
road? Should it also get the wikidata tag?
If we start putting
Here's another example:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34012792
This railroad track will get the wikidata tag, the other track and footway
won't. And even the track that gets the tag, isn't the whole length of the
bridge. And I didn't even look that hard. I found problems on 2 out of 6
bridges
Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's another example:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34012792
This railroad track will get the wikidata tag, the other track and footway
won't. And even the track that gets the tag, isn't the whole length of the
bridge. And I didn't even look that
On 28/08/2014 13:25, Andy Mabbett wrote:
I'm not anticipating many changes; this import gives a leg-up to a
human process.
(as has been mentioned before) wikidata may not change, but OSM data
surely does. If I split a way that has a wikidata tag, how do I know
which of the two resulting
Il giorno 29/ago/2014, alle ore 01:12, SomeoneElse
li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk ha scritto:
(as has been mentioned before) wikidata may not change, but OSM data surely
does. If I split a way that has a wikidata tag, how do I know which of the
two resulting elements should have the
[Intentionally posted to both talk@ and talk-us@. -- J]
I just now happened to try to access my personal fork of the repository for
the source code for the Field Papers (http://fieldpapers.org/) web app site
(said repository of source code can usually be found at
Released August 19, 2014 -
https://www.census.gov/geo/maps-data/data/tiger-line.html
Anyone know if they will be added to I.D editor anytime soon?
*Regards,*
*Hans*
*http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TheDutchMan13
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TheDutchMan13 *
Not to brag, but New York State is already all done. I mean, there may
be one or two mistakes, but when I was entering all of the streams
listed in Wikipedia for NY, I set the flow direction properly. So if
you have a way to exclude New York, you will have more productive
users.
-russ
Peter Barth
[The following is forwarded to the lists on behalf of Mr. Fitzsimmons at
his request. Apparently, his initial attempt to respond to my message to
talk@ and talk-us@ was bounced and/or held for moderation because he does
not subscribe to the lists. I'd like to emphasize that his response was
sent
fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
FIXME könnte vielleicht durch notes ersetzt werden.
Das bringts ja sowieso nur wenn die Daten sehr aktuell sind.
Sven
--
Das Einzige wovor wir Angst haben müssen ist die Angst selbst
(Franklin D. Roosevelt)
Wo trage ich z.B. die contact:*
Dürfte ich mal fragen wie du auf contact: gekommen bist? Ist nämlich
nicht grade die gängigste Tagging Variante.
__
openstreetmap.org/user/AndiG88
wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:AndiG88
___
Talk-de
On 21.08.2014 19:26, hike39 wrote:
Am 21.08.2014 um 19:07 schrieb Hartmut Holzgraefe:
Für die komplette Diskussion der Alternativen siehe
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route#Multiple_routes_share_the_same_path
für mich war auch noch dieses Proposal hilfreich
Mi unisco ai compliementi, davvero un ottima iniziativa. Ora speriamo che
diventi presto una sorta di best practise presso altre P.A.
Grazie!
Cesare
Cesare Gerbino
http://cesaregerbino.wordpress.com/
http://www.facebook.com/cesare.gerbino
lo so che ci sono dei tratti contesi, però tutti i confini, anche quelli
con la tanzania e con il congo sono stati grossolanamente delineati
seguendo in qualche maniera il letto dei fiumi (tutto a vantaggio del
burundi tra l'altro). idem per i confini interni tra le varie province.
grazie comunque
Mi associo!
--
FabC
Il giorno 27 agosto 2014 19:39, Luca Corsato luc...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Congratulazioni!
luca corsato
+393339187853
fb luca.corsato
tw lucacorsato
www.lucacorsato.it
On 27 Aug 2014, at 18:56, Simone Cortesi sim...@cortesi.com wrote:
Ciao,
Regione Toscana
Senior moment ;-)
From: Rob Nickerson [mailto:rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 August 2014 00:23
To: Andy Robinson
Cc: Matthijs Melissen; talk-gb-westmidlands
Subject: Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] September mapping party
Don't you mean NW? If so then I'll go do that new housing
2014-08-27 13:07 GMT+02:00 Christoffer Holmstedt
christoffer.holmst...@gmail.com:
psidata-länken hos Trollhättan ger 404 fel, är det bara jag?
Ah jo, skulle ha varit mer tydlig med att anledningen till att
Trollhättan ännu inte är med på e-delegationens PSI datakoll eftersom
de inte har någon
Buenos días,
en el caso de Sevilla, había un responsable para la cuenta, pero no
llegábamos a contactar con él, así que PerroVerd nos asignó la cuenta de
Catastro Sevilla para poder empezar a editar.
Con respecto a la página, nosotros lo que hemos hecho es usar la página de
Sevilla que ya estaba
Como se ha comentado hay certos valores que se consideran asumidos por
defecto, en esta lista solo podemos dar nuestras opiniones y hablar de
lo establecido. Creo que entre todos podemos mejorar, te animo ha hacer
una propuesta de cambio oficial.
De todos modos, si quieres revisar los datos,
2014-08-28 8:44 GMT+02:00 Simó Albert i Beltran s...@probeta.net:
Como se ha comentado hay certos valores que se consideran asumidos por
defecto, en esta lista solo podemos dar nuestras opiniones y hablar de
lo establecido. Creo que entre todos podemos mejorar, te animo ha hacer
una propuesta
El Wednesday 27 August 2014 20:05:01 Jorge Sanz Sanfructuoso va escriure:
surface tiene unpaved, paved, asphalt,
Me hecho las manos a la cabeza ala.. pero que no pone si esta asfaltada
ahora que hago puedo pasar por esa calle no no puedo. Pues no. Pues esto es
lo mismo.
Si entiendo
La query con v= no da los nodos sin el atributo (o cuyo atributo no
tiene valor). Me parece que devuelve los nodos que tienen algun valor
(cualquiera) en ese atributo.
No he visto una manera en la referencia del lenguaje de queries de
decir sencillamente que no tenga tal atributo.
Para el caso
El 28 de agosto de 2014, 11:16, Jose Luis Perez Diez
jl...@escomposlinux.org escribió:
por ejemplo en https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35481972/history el
oneway=yes es redundante e innecesario ya que no hay niguna motorway_link
en la zona con algun tramo que sea oneway=no
No veo que sea
Hombre jluis, tu por aqui :).
La wiki dice:
oneway=no is used to confirm that (a part of) a street is NOT a
oneway street. (Use only in order to avoid mapping errors in areas
where e.g. oneway streets are common, or to override defaults.)
Las poblaciones en mi experiencia son areas donde las
continua de leerlo hasta la conclusion se vuelve en ausencia del tag oneway
significa que el way es de doble sentido.
Jo
2014-08-28 11:26 GMT+02:00 Xavier Noria f...@hashref.com:
Hombre jluis, tu por aqui :).
La wiki dice:
oneway=no is used to confirm that (a part of) a street is NOT a
Hola,
Independientemente de que leyendo este tema creo que os estáis perdiendo en
los detalles, me meto:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Xavier Noria f...@hashref.com wrote:
Hombre jluis, tu por aqui :).
La wiki dice:
oneway=no is used to confirm that (a part of) a street is NOT a
Como bién dice Simó, esto no es algo que se pueda decidir en esta lista,
porque no es algo que concierna a la comunidad hispanoablante y/o española.
Te invito a acercarlo a la lista de discusión internacional,
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk o específicamente a
2014-08-28 11:51 GMT+02:00 María Arias de Reyna dela...@gmail.com:
Hola,
Independientemente de que leyendo este tema creo que os estáis perdiendo en
los detalles, me meto:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Xavier Noria f...@hashref.com wrote:
Hombre jluis, tu por aqui :).
La wiki dice:
2014-08-28 12:32 GMT+02:00 Jaime Crespo jy...@jynus.com:
Como bién dice Simó, esto no es algo que se pueda decidir en esta lista,
porque no es algo que concierna a la comunidad hispanoablante y/o española.
Te invito a acercarlo a la lista de discusión internacional,
Si, yo tampoco lo he visto.
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Jose Luis Perez Diez
jl...@escomposlinux.org wrote:
El Thursday 28 August 2014 11:42:17 Jo va escriure:
continua de leerlo hasta la conclusion se vuelve en ausencia del tag oneway
significa que el way es de doble sentido.
yo no lo
El Thursday 28 August 2014 11:21:03 Luis García Castro va escriure:
No veo que sea un buen ejemplo. Si no añades restricciones de giro esa vía
necesita sí o sí el oneway=yes :-\
las highway=motorway_link son oneway=yes por defecto.
___
Talk-es
Bueno,
Supongo que cada uno lee lo que quiere ;-D
oneway = no
*oneway*=no is used to confirm that (a part of) a street is NOT a oneway
street. (Use only in order to avoid mapping errors in areas where e.g.
oneway streets are common, or to override defaults.)
Lo del 'Use only...' creo que lo
El 28 de agosto de 2014, 13:10, Jose Luis Perez Diez
jl...@escomposlinux.org escribió:
las highway=motorway_link son oneway=yes por defecto.
Ah, claro. Tienes razón :-)
--
Luis García
___
Talk-es mailing list
Talk-es@openstreetmap.org
El 28 de agosto de 2014, 13:14, Luis García Castro lui...@gmail.com
escribió:
El 28 de agosto de 2014, 13:10, Jose Luis Perez Diez
jl...@escomposlinux.org escribió:
las highway=motorway_link son oneway=yes por defecto.
Ah, claro. Tienes razón :-)
Aunque estamos en las mismas, en cierto
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Antonio Navarro anto...@hunos.net wrote:
Si lo que buscas es una etiqueta de 'esto lo he puesto a conciencia y está
correcto', olvídate porque creo que ni existe ni serviría de nada porque 'El
Mundo Real'(tm) cambia y la API para que informe los cambios a
Hago un resumen del thread, que llevamos cienes de mensajes :):
1. El valor por defecto de oneway depende del tipo de via. Para calles
es no (implicito).
2. En una ciudad como Barcelona donde la mayoria de calles son de un
solo sentido, el wiki recomienda poner no explicitamente.
3. Para poder
Es que no pones 'yes o no' al 'sentido de una calle' (que los valores
serían 'left, right, both' o algo similar), lo pones a 'dirección única' y
en una carretera sin señalizar, vuelvo a repetir, en general (no me conozco
la legislación de todos los países del planeta), es de doble dirección y lo
Fijate en el parrafo al que estaba respondiendo.
El comentario era: si quieres etiquetar para decir que es correcto
olvidate porque hay errores y las cosas cambian. Los datos tienen
errores y cambian si, pero eso aplica a cualquier atributo, y no por
ello dejamos de etiquetar.
2014-08-28 13:57
Si falta la etiqueta 'name' en una calle, es que no se ha etiquetado. Si
falta la etiqueta 'oneway' no puedes deducir lo mismo porque sólo se indica
donde es necesaria (tanto a 'yes' como a 'no' donde se requiera). Entiendo
que pueda causar incertidumbre si no está, pero no más que cualquier otra
2014-08-28 14:57 GMT+02:00 Antonio Navarro anto...@hunos.net:
Si falta la etiqueta 'name' en una calle, es que no se ha etiquetado. Si
falta la etiqueta 'oneway' no puedes deducir lo mismo porque sólo se indica
donde es necesaria (tanto a 'yes' como a 'no' donde se requiera). Entiendo
que
Efectivamente, la consulta que te he pasado muestra todos los ways que
tienen la clave oneway, con cualquier valor.
Las zonas amarillas de la consulta que has mandado son el interior de un
poligono, un way cerrado. Salen muchos porque estas seleccionando
todos los ways que no tengan estos
highway=motorway_link implica oneway=yes
pgpQPdXjT9BOg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Talk-es mailing list
Talk-es@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. August 2014 um 22:01 Uhr
Von: David Schmitt da...@black.co.at
An: talk-at@openstreetmap.org
Betreff: Re: [Talk-at] Brücken
On 2014-08-27 20:39, Gabriel Pfuner wrote:
Wann ist ein Name ein richtiger Name?
Nach meinem OSM-Verständnis, dann wenn die lokale
Wow, gratuliere, die Karte ist wirklich wunderschön geworden!
Gibt nichts zu meckern, einfach tolle Arbeit.
LG,
Markus
2014-08-26 8:24 GMT+02:00 Thomas Konrad tkon...@gmx.net:
Hallo,
ich habe vor kurzem eine Karte erstellt, die die Gebäudeabdeckung in
Österreich zeigt:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 08:24:09 +0200
Thomas Konrad tkon...@gmx.net wrote:
Hallo,
ich habe vor kurzem eine Karte erstellt, die die Gebäudeabdeckung in
Österreich zeigt:
http://thomaskonrad.at/2014/08/analyse-der-openstreetmap-gebaudeabdeckung-in-osterreich/
Die Karte soll als
Hallo,
Passend zur Grbäudeabdeckung hab ich mit Unterstützung von Tom ein Tool
erstellt, welches es leichter macht Gebäude aus basemap.at Bildern zu
mappen.
Das Plugin für JOSM nennt sich Areaselector und is auch in den normalen
Josm Plugins gelistet. Quellcode und ist unter
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 21:53:34 +0200
Paul Woelfel paul.woel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hallo,
Passend zur Grbäudeabdeckung hab ich mit Unterstützung von Tom ein Tool
erstellt, welches es leichter macht Gebäude aus basemap.at Bildern zu
mappen.
Endlich... danke! :) Ich hab mich mit scanaerial
Jap is richtig, ich geh auf die Fläche. Durch div Operatoren aber passt die
Fläche relativ gut auch zu den Kanten. Der Areaselector funktioniert in
allen Zoomstufen, in manchen natürlich besser. Wir haben auch probiert den
Zoomlevel auf das richtige zu setzten, sind aber noch nicht auf einen
On 14-08-28 01:44 AM, James Ewen wrote:
OSM is a living entity that changes.
I know this, James. But an edit should change the map for the better.
There were trails along Horne Lake, trails with boardwalks and bridges
that I walked and mapped by hand. But that work's gone — foom! —
replaced
I give a big +1 to James' comments
-Original Message-
From: James Ewen [mailto:ve6...@gmail.com]
... existing data usually stays. Obviously a mistake was made. We're all human.
... whichever source has the best resolution should be the one that stays, or
perhaps a merge of the best
Hello:
For what it's worth I've downloaded the changeset (# 20327545 ) around
Horner lake and there wasn't any trails there prior to my upload. I'll
continue to investigate.
Andrew
aka CanvecImports
___
Talk-ca mailing list
mohu se zeptat jaké jsou nové zprávy o traceru lpis
Pražák
Dne 26. srpna 2014 19:24 Marián Kyral mky...@email.cz napsal(a):
Tak web jede, wms (podkladová mapa) taky, ale WFS, které v traceru
používám, bohužel ne. Servis sice jede, ale v podstatě nic v něm není.
Uvidíme, jestli to během
Zeptat se můžeš.
Včera odpoledne jsem jim psal. Sice zatím neodpověděli, nicméně nějaké změny
tam byly. Momentálně mi dotaz na LPIS_FB4_BBOX a LPIS_FB4_01 vrátí
databázovou chybu. Čekám, jestli to opraví, nebo jestli jim mám znova
napsat.
V každém případě, až to plně zprovozní, budu muset vydat
Ahoj.
Jsem jen občasný přispěvatel a OSMi jsem neznal. Děkuji za info.
Již jsem se párkrát a nyní i znovu s užitím OSMi setkal s problémem
velkých a malých písmen v názvech ulic. Například v Olomouci je ulice:
Na Střelnici
To je pojmenování ulice v OSM. OSMi však zde červená asi proto, že
Dne 28.8.2014 v 12:09 Marek Chlup napsal(a):
Ahoj.
Jsem jen občasný přispěvatel a OSMi jsem neznal. Děkuji za info.
Již jsem se párkrát a nyní i znovu s užitím OSMi setkal s problémem
velkých a malých písmen v názvech ulic. Například v Olomouci je ulice:
Na Střelnici
To je pojmenování
Dne Čt 28. srpna 2014 12:09:56, Marek Chlup napsal(a):
Ahoj.
Jsem jen občasný přispěvatel a OSMi jsem neznal. Děkuji za info.
Již jsem se párkrát a nyní i znovu s užitím OSMi setkal s problémem
velkých a malých písmen v názvech ulic. Například v Olomouci je ulice:
Na Střelnici
To je
Dne 28.8.2014 12:51, Jan Kouba napsal(a):
Na té ceduli to stejně nejspíš bude všechno velkýma (NA STŘELNICI). Zdá se
mi,
že všechny cedule s názvy (ulice, města, názvy turistických rozcestníků, ...)
se schválně píší pouze velkými písmeny, aby v tom neudělali náhodou chybu,
nebo aby se to
Dne 28. srpna 2014 13:00 Petr Morávek [Xificurk] p...@pada.cz napsal(a):
Dne 28.8.2014 12:51, Jan Kouba napsal(a):
Na té ceduli to stejně nejspíš bude všechno velkýma (NA STŘELNICI). Zdá
se mi,
že všechny cedule s názvy (ulice, města, názvy turistických rozcestníků,
...)
se schválně píší
Požadavek byl předán k řešení. Tož uvidíme.
Celé odpoledne budu pryč, takže další update nejdříve večer.
Marián
-- Původní zpráva --
Od: Marián Kyral mky...@email.cz
Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic talk-cz@openstreetmap.org
Datum: 28. 8. 2014 10:42:16
Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz]
Dne 28.8.2014 v 13:30 Václav Řehák napsal(a):
Dne 28. srpna 2014 13:00 Petr Morávek [Xificurk] p...@pada.cz
mailto:p...@pada.cz napsal(a):
Dne 28.8.2014 12:51, Jan Kouba napsal(a):
Na té ceduli to stejně nejspíš bude všechno velkýma (NA STŘELNICI). Zdá
se mi,
že
Zatím žádná změna. Snad zítra.
Marián
Dne 28.8.2014 15:18, Marián Kyral napsal(a):
Požadavek byl předán k řešení. Tož uvidíme.
Celé odpoledne budu pryč, takže další update nejdříve večer.
Marián
-- Původní zpráva --
Od: Marián Kyral mky...@email.cz
Komu: OpenStreetMap
Dne 28.8.2014 12:50, Jan Martinec napsal(a):
Nicméně: ten problém s adresami ale je větší: velká a malá písmena bych
považoval za ne-problém, to funguje při vyhledávání téměř všude (takže bych to
neřešil a považoval za false positive); ale co se zkratkami? Třeba celý úsek
podél Mariánských
Dne 28.8.2014 20:50, Marián Kyral napsal(a):
Dne 28.8.2014 12:50, Jan Martinec napsal(a):
Nicméně: ten problém s adresami ale je větší: velká a malá písmena bych
považoval za ne-problém, to funguje při vyhledávání téměř všude (takže bych
to
neřešil a považoval za false positive); ale co se
On je hlavní problém s ulicemi pojmenovanými po lidech.
Dvořákova / A. Dvořáka / Ant. Dvořáka / Antonína Dvořáka - vše je
de-facto správně.
příklad z ČB: Rudolfovská / Rudolfovská tř. / rudolfovská třída
JD
Dne 28. srpna 2014 20:50 Marián Kyral mky...@email.cz napsal(a):
Dne 28.8.2014 12:50,
Dne 28.8.2014 21:00, Petr Morávek [Xificurk] napsal(a):
Dne 28.8.2014 20:50, Marián Kyral napsal(a):
Dne 28.8.2014 12:50, Jan Martinec napsal(a):
Nicméně: ten problém s adresami ale je větší: velká a malá písmena bych
považoval za ne-problém, to funguje při vyhledávání téměř všude (takže bych
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
