will complain and the whole exercise will
be largely useless. Shipping a complete kit guarantees that everything will
match up and can be uninstalled easily.
But I agree with Dimitry - we should take care to distinguish kits
containing debug symbols from actual 'Debug' builds.
Pau
bjections. Or I can create a work branch for review.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
had
problems reproducing it manually. For now, all I can suggest is that we
remove the option to set legacy auth support in the Fb3 installer.
This option has already been removed in Fb 4.0.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:14:43 -0300
Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
> On 22/12/2021 10:12, Paul Reeves wrote:
> >
> > Is there any reason why set_build_target only tests for VS150COMNTOOLS ?
> >
>
> Looks like no.
>
I've been looking into this m
On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 15:32:41 +0100
Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> Paul Reeves wrote 22.12.2021 14:12:
> > Is there any reason why set_build_target only tests for VS150COMNTOOLS ?
> >
> > I'd like to add tests for VS160COMNTOOLS and VS170COMNTOOLS, unless th
Is there any reason why set_build_target only tests for VS150COMNTOOLS ?
I'd like to add tests for VS160COMNTOOLS and VS170COMNTOOLS, unless there are
any objections.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interfa
eds the MSM module, as well as WiX. But there
are also some changes required to the WiX projects as well as
BuildExecutableInstall.bat and the innosetup script.
I'm working on the fixes now.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
Firebird-Devel mailing lis
nd later ? It might just be better to
document what the absolute minimum is rather than encourage it.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
e located the cause of the problem.
I'll commit the fix once I'm sure.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 13:31:10 +0300
Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
> On 2/2/21 12:16 PM, Paul Reeves wrote:
> > I doubt that our user base for 32-bit ARM is really very significant but
> > 32-bit ARM chips probably have a good future ahead of them.
>
> Not sure. I
the question about x86 quite frequently. I can see a
reason for maintaining support in the code base but I find it hard to justify
producing official x86 binaries for new versions of Firebird.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
Firebird-Devel mail
aka long unsigned int (*)(long
unsigned int)}’ to binary ‘operator-’ size = length - (VALGRIND_REDZONE +
GUARD_BYTES);
Similar errors appear when building B3_0_Release.
Should I log this as a bug?
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
Firebird-Devel mail
On Wed, 21 Oct 2020 15:13:07 +0200
Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> On 21-10-2020 12:50, Paul Reeves wrote:
> > The new packages are now in the pre-release area. I've bumped the package
> > number, so the previous URLs will probably no longer work. But I think
> > this is necess
On Wed, 19 Aug 2020 05:47:59 +0300
Norbert Saint Georges wrote:
> Paul Reeves a écrit :
>
> >
> > Does anyone have any thoughts on this?
> >
> >
> > Paul
>
> First of all, thanks for your code, it's nicer to read than c ++ :-)
>
> Ju
ory. I'd like to include those
files because I have found they solve quite a few problems.
And I would appreciate any suggestions you have.
> It is desirable that the examples can be compiled in both FPC and Delpli.
They are just .pas files and a makefile.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.
ications in any
language that supports the new api.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
7;d like to see java
and .Net examples distributed. And any others languages that can connect to
Firebird. Why not, for example, have 03.select.java that demonstrates the
minimum required to do a select in java AND produces identical results
to 03.select.cpp?
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibph
rt of the VCL is overkill. :-)
Actually I should have written RTL. But your comment made me think more
clearly. Thanks.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
where all the base classes are
declared. There is no need for the VCL at all. (Thank goodness.)
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
ractice we should
probably integrate the examples into the VCL. And that might be a step too
far.
Does anyone have any thoughts on this?
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/list
Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
> On 2020-08-12 19:32, Paul Reeves wrote:
> > I'm working on re-creating the makefile for the api examples. I don't know
> > how, but it seems to have got lost a long while ago.
> >
> > Almost everything still compiles in H
y in that
file.
(Yes, I know the isc api is deprecated but as long as we continue to ship the
these examples in the kits they should build and there should be a makefile to
build them.)
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
Firebird-Devel mailing list
re that the makefile is not the
problem.
I'll commit the makefile as everything else builds without error.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
bird::IReferenceCountedImplFirebird::ThrowStatusWrapper,
Base>Firebird::InheritFirebird::ThrowStatusWrapper,
Base>Firebird::Inherit > > >] virtual unsigned
Base>getAlignedLength(StatusType* status) = 0; ^~~~
Is this an error in the code or in my makefile?
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
CONNECT or CREATE DATABASE to specify a database
> SQL> CREATE DATABASE 'test32.fdb' PAGE_SIZE 32768;
> SQL> show db;
> Database: test32.fdb
> Owner: SYSDBA
> PAGE_SIZE 32768
>
>
Try specifying a charset :-)
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
h
n anyone confirm the situation with Windows? I find it hard to believe that
Microsoft aren't on the ball with this.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
omated updates how will a server
installation know to look for them? A task scheduler of some sort would
need to check. We don't have one built in to Firebird so it would mean
adding something platform specific.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Fi
aller is being updated for Beta 2, and it is
likely to change frequently over the next few days.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
d. But
that doesn't solve the underlying problem.
Another aspect, which is more personal, is that like most Anglophones I
don't really need the character support provided by icu. And living in a
country with a single time zone I don't need the time zone support
either. For me icu spells
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 16:48:29 +0100
Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 26.02.2020 15:39, Paul Reeves wrote:
> > Been there, looked at that :-)
> >
> > AFAICT it is for InterBase 2020 which is only available for Windows at the
> > moment. The tests in the article were done wit
of that is that there is only one cache writer, and journal writes
are queued in the memory cache until they are finally written out to disc.
The only different to Firebird's asynchronous writes that I can see is that
journalling uses its own cache instead of the filesystem cache.
P
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:23:32 +0100
Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 26.02.2020 13:46, Paul Reeves wrote:
> > If anyone can let me have a copy of InterBase XE7 I would be happy to run
> > some proper comparisons on our test rig.
>
>Developers Edition is free to download
On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 16:28:38 +0300
Alex Peshkoff via Firebird-devel wrote:
> On 2020-02-26 15:46, Paul Reeves wrote:
> > AFAICT most of the content of that document is rubbish. They have
> > certainly skewed our support costs heavily, using the most extreme
> > examples.
&
d-fashioned HDD.
If anyone can let me have a copy of InterBase XE7 I would be happy to run
some proper comparisons on our test rig.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
;t
cost much. And if, one day, the web server wants to use that value, the url
will go to the correct page. There are quite a lot of differences between 2.5,
3.0 and 4.0. But unless the web-server has pages that make this distinction,
this doesn't matter.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibp
On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 15:42:50 +0100
Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 09.01.2020 13:53, Paul Reeves wrote:
> > So the question should whether to include dynamic gpre examples in the
> > packages or just remove them from the repo. As far as I know they have
> > been deprecated for
t.
So the question should whether to include dynamic gpre examples in the
packages or just remove them from the repo. As far as I know they have been
deprecated for a long while and have not been shipped in the product since
maybe even InterBase days.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 17:32:06 +0100
Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 06.12.2019 20:08, Paul Reeves wrote:
> > But I guess we should upgrade anyway. Perhaps a more pertinent question
> > would be too ask whether we need to stick with v5. We haven't hacked
> > the code. We
l perspective though as it is easy to spot files
that have been edited or binaries installed from different packages. I'll
take a look at the code and see if I can fix it.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface
plied again to Adriano, and received another email from
> --- "Your message to
> Firebird-test awaits moderator approval".
>
> Please advise.
>
>
>
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
. We haven't hacked
the code. We just use InnoSetup from a standard install so there is no
reason to stay with an older version unless v6 actually breaks the
existing install script.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
Firebird-Devel mailing list,
On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 17:03:14 +0200
Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 07.10.2019 17:00, Paul Reeves wrote:
> > Both servers are using Beta1
>
>Upgrade to snapshot. It had been fixed since then.
>
>
Hmm - I thought of that, but couldn't see anything specific in th
missing?
Both servers are using Beta1 and synchronous replication works fine so
the firebird installation appears to be OK.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
itten to the either of the replication logs.
What am I missing?
(BTW, synchronous replication 'just works'.)
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
[
http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-3900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul Reeves reopened CORE-3900:
---
I'll take another look.
> VC runtime installer can reboot system prior to installation f
ersion. (As far as I recall.)
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
for UDFs and SPs, but I have
always assumed that a UDF will load and execute more quickly than a SP.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
erformance estimation is correct.
>
Jiri,
Perhaps the real comparison should be between UDR and UDF.
Can you test that?
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
/STAMP is the
wrong way round. It should support the old behaviour. Instead of
introducing LOCALTIME/STAMP to return current time without the zone
we should introduce new variables that return time zones for those
that need them.
That may not solve the problem in [subject] but it will ease the pain
On Tue, 7 May 2019 10:54:53 +0200
Massimo Fazzolari wrote:
> Anybody could help me to figure out what's wrong with the
> FPC 64bit compiler? Is there any compile/linker flag that I should
> use?
It might help to tell us which compiler and linker flags you are
already using.
6001. But in all cases
8009 was the winner. I didn't go deeper - it may be that the real sweet
spot is between, say, 6,000 and 12,000, but again, it may also be
database/application specific. But I would start with 8009 and maybe go
upward slowly, rather than jumping to around 64K.
Paul
--
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 16:36:25 +0200
Vlad Khorsun wrote:
> 19.03.2019 15:48, Paul Reeves wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 15:33:23 +0200
> > Vlad Khorsun wrote:
> > >>
> >> The best (and only guarantee) is to use "official" compile
On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 15:33:23 +0200
Vlad Khorsun wrote:
>
>The best (and only guarantee) is to use "official" compiler. For
> fb25 on Windows it is VC8 (VS2005).
Actually, it is MSVC10 :-)
MSVC8 was for 2.1, if I recall correctly.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http:
correct srp is a form of legacy authorization,
even if it does not use the legacy_auth plugin.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
e use zero
security at the un/pw level so don't really care about security.
We want to take our users with us. To do so means keeping migration as
simple as possible.
What is the opinion of others on this subject?
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 17:54:40 +0100
Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 23.02.2019 17:51, Paul Reeves wrote:
> > It is linked to the fact that rpm installs don't allow
> > interaction at install time, so the security database is not
> > initialised.
>
>IIRC, rp
.
>
As far as linux and Firebird 3 is concerned that is definitely a
problem. It is linked to the fact that rpm installs don't allow
interaction at install time, so the security database is not
initialised.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
ed but there are
meant to be two boiler plate readme's - one for dev releases and one for
prod releases. That one is surely not appropriate for a beta. I'll look
into it.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 11:50:11 +0100
Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 15.02.2019 9:17, Paul Reeves wrote:
> > First you need to click on the 'Desktop Development with C++'
>
>You are talking about installing of Visual Studio. My question was
> differ
inXP option is
checked (it is off by default).
You then need to go to individual components and make sure that the
VC++ option for v141 tools is checked as well as the WinXP option.
I _think_ everything else is optional.
You also need to set VS150COMNTOOLS manually.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http:/
s that they are unique.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
od
system IO. But this is NOT synonymous with the IO from a real disc
subsystem. Basically a RAM disc will reduce IO to the absolute
minimum available with today's technology. But it is probably not the
most suitable location to host a firebird database so the performance
results would be invalid.
P
ously missing from the list of possible tag values ?
- Or is it that this tag value is not available among the possible tag
values for this call ?
- Or is it something so obvious that I'm just missing it completely ?
- Or ?
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users o
ff
as one flaw can used to exploit another.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slas
On Tue, 9 Jan 2018 09:52:59 + Omacht András wrote
>
> Average running time on 4.9.0-4: 466 secs (7 mins 46 secs)
> Average running time on 4.9.0-5: 635 secs (10 mins 35 secs)
That is a massive hit.
Has anyone had a chance to run tests on AMD kit?
Paul
--
Paul Re
SVC12 or
13. And if you are working on HEAD you will likely find other
small bits that are missing. Don't forget that HEAD is still in alpha.
You may find working with the FB 3 branch easier to get started on.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Support
: GSTAT
Reporter: Paul Reeves
Priority: Minor
It would be nice to have a timestamp in a gstat report otherwise it is
necessary to rely on the file creation date, which is not always correct.
This could be the first line of gstat output, just before the Database
"/pa
firebird. Have you tried other kernels from other distros ? ( 4.1 is
getting old, now - the latest is 4.12, I think. )
Have you compared the compile params Oracle Linux uses ? Perhaps they
have changed something.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting
ed to generate firebird.pas? I looked at the code
in Makefile.in and makeInstallImage.sh.in for the linux kits and
it is not at all obvious what is needed to add this to the windows
build process.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Fir
make_all.bat
and then I'll re-write the code in BuildExecutableInstall.bat to just
strip comments from that file.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
--
Check out the vibrant tec
o me. There is new stuff added to Alpha1
but nothing seems to be missing.
>
> - include/firebird/impl is not included
>
In fact that is my fault. Several installer related commits to
B3_0_Release never got forward ported to HEAD. I'm working on bringing
all of them
stener is running on a timer in the main thread.
The event listener should really be running in its own thread.
Have you tried that?
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
--
Check out the
On Sat, 26 Aug 2017 19:04:28 -0300 Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote
> Hi!
>
> I found two problems with include files:
>
> - ibase.h has #include "consts_pub.h"
>
> - include/firebird/impl is not included
>
Can you file that as a bug, and I'l
e plans generated within the engine during actual execution.
Which leads to a question... How/When are Stored Procedures prepared?
A complex SP can have many different execution paths. Is each
statement prepared as needed for each execution or are all statements
prepared at once, during the initial prep
ter to extend PLAN and EXPLAIN with
an option to dive into the details of a SP's execution rather than add
a new command.
But whatever happened to the SP debugger? If we had that, then I
would be able to see the plan chosen for each statement in the SP,
which would go a long way to helping me
SP source,
remove the 'create proc myproc' and insert 'execute block' and then
prepare it with input param markers the plan (or plans) is/are actually
returned.
So obviously this information is available internally. How come it is
supressed for SPs in FB 3.0? Is this a bug?
u can see the IDPL here:
https://www.ibphoenix.com/about/firebird/idpl
and the IPL here:
https://www.ibphoenix.com/about/firebird/ipl
> 2. What prefix do you prefer for this?
>
> I prefer LIB$, like LIB$CheckTriggerUniquePostion.
>
> Any other idea?
That could work. Does anyone els
e.
It is not too much work, but it does require commitment if the
intention is that these procedures should ship with Firebird. Bit rot
can set in very quickly if no-one is around to maintain code.
Perhaps the first step would be to create a github project to allow
people to contrib
tored procedure will
return a single record if AEMP_NO has a value and the entire table if
it is null. The advantage of using that sort of construct is that only
one SQL statement is required, rather than a more complex 'if then
else' but is it safe from future implementation changes ?
e fetches and the indexed reads more or
less double because of the OR clause.
(Again, a subject for another day is why does the optimiser even bother
with the second stream when EMP_NO can never be null ? )
Anyway, none of the above is any sort of criticism. I'm just trying to
get a better und
On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 18:07:55 +0300 Dmitry Yemanov wrote
> 07.07.2017 17:51, Paul Reeves wrote:
>
> > But that doesn't answer all my questions...
> >
> > Given
> >
> >where e.EMP_NO = COALESCE(?, e.emp_no )
> >
> > and that there is an i
hough a field is specified in the coalesce why can't I
force the plan...
PLAN (E INDEX (RDB$PRIMARY7))
This error is raised...
'cannot be used in the specified plan'
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
--
does the optimiser consider COALESCE when this construct is used
in a stored procedure?
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the
On Wed, 5 Jul 2017 12:25:11 -0300 Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote
> On 04/07/2017 11:33, Paul Reeves wrote:
> > Building udrcpp_example fails under windows, and has done since at
> > least the final release of Firebird 3.0. Unfortunately the build
> > process doesn't
s
installed there. I'll try this on a development VM later.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's mos
tusType
*,const char *,Firebird::IUdrFunctionFactory *)' as a function argument
Shall I log this as a bug?
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
--
Check out the vibrant tec
ut still recommended from a performance
perspective. (Which is the whole point of using events in the first
place.)
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
--
Check out the vibrant te
Anyone ?
On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 11:12:47 +0200 Paul Reeves wrote
> The EPB is clearly documented as being limited to 15 events. I did a
> fairly rough grep of the code and I failed to find where this
> limitation is enforced. And I couldn't find anything in the release
> notes
ation
without anyone noticing? Or have I missed something while grepping the
code?
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world&#
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:35:32 +0100 Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote
> 23.03.2017 16:09, Paul Reeves wrote:
> > The reason we need it is because git seems to check (some) files out
> > with LF eols and we need to deploy all text files with CR LF eols.
>
>It can be changed in
idn't discover this
until late in the RC stage of v3.0.0, hence a rapid fix with unix2dos.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Firebird
--
Check out the vibrant tech community o
nd unix2dos on linux assumes that output will be in dos format - hence
the name. Why the gnuwin32 version doesn't make that assumption is
anyone's guess. So the -D (or --unix2dos in the long format ) is
required.
Paul
--
On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 11:38:51 +0200 you wrote
> LibreOffice Release notes
>
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/5.3#Base
>
IIUC, every time you open/close a firebird database in LO it calls
gbak to do a restore or a backup.
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.i
Components: UDF
Affects Versions: 2.5.6
Environment: Windows
Reporter: Paul Reeves
UDFs declared with large varchars take excessive time to execute
An IBPhoenix client reported the following problem to us.
A single udf, when declared with a 32k string length
source tree was mangled in some way. I
had previously used to to do a build on another platform and just
zipped it up and copied it across.
So perhaps the problem, (apart from the user himself :-) ), is that
'make clean' does not make clean enough. I tried that a couple of
times, as well as
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 13:00:53 +0300
Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> On 06/29/2016 12:42 PM, Paul Reeves wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 11:07:06 +0200
> > Paul Reeves wrote:
> >
> > symbol lookup
> > error:
> > /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/Firebird-3.0.0.32483-0/gen/R
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 11:07:06 +0200
Paul Reeves wrote:
>
> I'll try building from the epel-7 source rpm and see if that works.
>
That seems to fix the FB_CPU problem
And now I'm getting a new error :
symbol lookup
error:
/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/Firebird-3.0.0.32483-0/gen/R
m
> >
> >
>
> Strange error you have, no idea why
>
>
It is probably because I have tried to build the tagged Firebird 3.0.0
source. I notice in the fedora build logs that several patches have been
applied.
I'll try building from the epel-7 source rpm and see if
gets defined as
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu so surely that ought to be enough information
to define AMD64 but for some reason that does happen.
Anyone got any ideas?
Paul
--
Paul Reeves
http://www.ibphoenix.com
Supporting users of Fir
Affects Versions: 3.0.0, 4.0 Initial
Environment: Linux
Reporter: Paul Reeves
Priority: Minor
The first build problem arrives with DELAYED_EXTENT_COUNT being used in
anonymous namespace, before it has been defined globally. That was easy enough
to work around. But
1 - 100 of 221 matches
Mail list logo
