Re: [PEIRCE-L] Panentheism: A framework for reconciling diverse perspectives on God, was, A logical problem, was: Cosmic Christi Theology, was, A Scientific Religion, was, Semiosic Synechism: A Peirce

nscendental is the conditions for the possibility of knowledge, so a > matter of knowledge. If knowledge isn´t something, you have to believe in, > that is. > > Best regards, Helmut > > > 22. September 2024 um 20:24 Uhr > *Von:* "Gary Richmond" > > List, > >

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Panentheism: A framework for reconciling diverse perspectives on God, was, A logical problem, was: Cosmic Christi Theology, was, A Scientific Religion, was, Semiosic Synechism: A Peirce

19, 2024 at 9:35 PM Jerry LR Chandler < jerry_lr_chand...@icloud.com> wrote: > List: > > On Sep 18, 2024, at 6:50 PM, Gary Richmond > wrote: > > I should preface these comments by noting that I consider panentheism to > be at present an underdeveloped concept.

Re: [PEIRCE-L] A logical problem, was: Cosmic Christi Theology, was, A Scientific Religion, was, Semiosic Synechism: A Peircean Argumentation

at 6:28 PM Jon Alan Schmidt wrote: > Gary R., List: > > I was simply responding to Helmut's statement that he did not understand > my previous post, which (among other things) sought to correct his > misinterpretation of Matthew 25:40. > > Regards, > > Jon > > O

Re: [PEIRCE-L] A logical problem, was: Cosmic Christi Theology, was, A Scientific Religion, was, Semiosic Synechism: A Peircean Argumentation

; >>> Best regards, Helmut >>> >> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > ARISBE: THE PEIRCE GATEWAY is now at > https://cspeirce.com and, just as well, at > https://www.cspeirce.com . It'll take a while to repair / update all the > links! > ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on &

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Panentheism: A framework for reconciling diverse perspectives on God, was, A logical problem, was: Cosmic Christi Theology, was, A Scientific Religion, was, Semiosic Synechism: A Peirce

essarium*, > without > qualification. Moreover, in accordance with Peirce's semeiotic, every sign > must be determined by a dynamical object that is unaffected by it; hence, > if the universe affects God, then God *cannot *be the dynamical object of > the universe as one immens

Re: [PEIRCE-L] A logical problem, was: Cosmic Christi Theology, was, A Scientific Religion, was, Semiosic Synechism: A Peircean Argumentation

t I >> guess, that this nonsymmetry of "function" is the basis for the difference >> between theism and panentheism. Jon, is there the discipline "mathematical >> theology"? If not, I think, there should be! >> >> Best regards, Helmut >> > _ _

[PEIRCE-L] Panentheism: A framework for reconciling diverse perspectives on God, was, A logical problem, was: Cosmic Christi Theology, was, A Scientific Religion, was, Semiosic Synechism: A Peircean A

; >> Best regards, Helmut >> > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ARISBE: THE PEIRCE GATEWAY is now at > https://cspeirce.com and, just as well, at https://www.cspeirce.com . > It'll take a while to repair / update all the links! ► PEIRCE-L > subscribers: Click on "Reply List"

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Cosmic Christi Theology, was, A Scientific Religion, was, Semiosic Synechism: A Peircean Argumentation

t; to REPLY ON > PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to > peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . > ► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to > l...@list.iupui.edu with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the > message and nothing in the body. More at >

[PEIRCE-L] Cosmic Christi Theology, was, A Scientific Religion, was, Semiosic Synechism: A Peircean Argumentation

GATEWAY is now at > https://cspeirce.com and, just as well, at > https://www.cspeirce.com . It'll take a while to repair / update all the > links! > ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON > PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L

[PEIRCE-L] A Scientific Religion, was, Semiosic Synechism: A Peircean Argumentation

> https://cspeirce.com and, just as well, at > https://www.cspeirce.com . It'll take a while to repair / update all the > links! > ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON > PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go t

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Interpretation of Peirce on Aesthetics and the Divine

lead us to feel > pity for ourselves in light of our long record of human shortcomings and > nausea in response to the modern technological and social worlds we have > inherited from prior generations and have fashioned for ourselves? > > Looking forward to your thoughts. > >

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce's Speculative Grammar (was Semiosic Synechism: A Peircean Argumentation)

_ > ARISBE: THE PEIRCE GATEWAY is now at > https://cspeirce.com and, just as well, at > https://www.cspeirce.com . It'll take a while to repair / update all the > links! > ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON > PEI

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Semiosic Synechism: A Peircean Argumentation

m and, just as well, at > https://www.cspeirce.com . It'll take a while to repair / update all the > links! > ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON > PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to > peirce-L@list.iup

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce's Speculative Grammar (was Semiosic Synechism: A Peircean Argumentation)

. > > I find that long quotations are tedious to read, but I absolutely accept > that I should have provided some support for my comments - I think the > reference to Robert Marty’s impressive work ..should suffice. > > Edwina > > On Sep 9, 2024, at 7:24 PM, Gary Richmond wrote:

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce's Speculative Grammar (was Semiosic Synechism: A Peircean Argumentation)

erse. Again - is there any reference to this in Peirce? >> >> Edwina >> > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > ARISBE: THE PEIRCE GATEWAY is now at > https://cspeirce.com and, just as well, at > https://www.cspeirce.com . It'll take a while to repair / update all the > l

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce's Speculative Grammar (was Semiosic Synechism: A Peircean Argumentation)

> operating within a semiotic process and that means - we interpret Peirce’s > text. > > All that can be done, in my view, is that we can discuss our different > views; support them with text AND analysis - and leave it at that. I don’t > think that anyone should then decide - ah- X

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce's Speculative Grammar (was Semiosic Synechism: A Peircean Argumentation)

mic Object and just a part of the full informational >> content of the Real Object - that forms the Immediate Object, and it is >> this IO data that is transformed by the mediative laws of the Representamen >> into the various Interpretants. >> >> Edwina >>

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Semiosic Synechism: A Peircean Argumentation

message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to > peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . > ► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to > l...@list.iupui.edu with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the > message and nothing in the body. More at > https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/us

[PEIRCE-L] The pragmatic character of Peirce's religious views.

n the body. More at https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html . ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and co-managed by him and Ben Udell.

[PEIRCE-L] Is CAS isomorphic to Peirce's 3 Categories, was,: Peirce and Anselm (was "A man could not have any idea that was not anthropomorphic")

ou note - all the energy and matter > that exist are contained within the universe. The question then moves to > HOW is this energy/matter organized? The Answer - as a CAS - a complex > organized system. > > Edwina > > On Aug 30, 2024, at 3:45 PM, Gary Richmond > wrote: > >

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce and Anselm (was "A man could not have any idea that was not anthropomorphic")

treff:* Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce and Anselm (was "A man could not have >>> any idea that was not anthropomorphic") >>> JAS, List >>> >>> But - Peirce, in 1.412, does indeed very specifically outline how the >>> three categories ‘come into being’ from No

Re: [PEIRCE-L] CSP: "A man could not have any idea that was not anthropomorphic," was, Ens necessarium

e-into-modal-being..together, all at once. > > So- we’ll have to disagree! But - that’s what discussion permits! > > Edwina > > On Aug 28, 2024, at 2:39 PM, Gary Richmond > wrote: > > Edwina, List, > > Perhaps we'll never see eye to eye on this, but let me at least

Re: [PEIRCE-L] CSP: "A man could not have any idea that was not anthropomorphic," was, Ens necessarium

potentiality. Continuity, aa generality, is inherent > in potentiality, which is essentially general’ 6.204. BUT - my point is > that ALL THREE Modes are necessarily operating within this emergence of the > universe. There isn’t any linear first…in their existentiality of being. > >

Re: [PEIRCE-L] CSP: "A man could not have any idea that was not anthropomorphic," was, Ens necessarium

ust > felt like this). I just wanted to say, that maybe point 2 is true, and in > that case, maybe there never has been "nothing". I think, the buddhist say > so, I am not a buddhist, but this their point is worth of taking it into > the discourse as possibility (type due to

Re: [PEIRCE-L] CSP: "A man could not have any idea that was not anthropomorphic," was, Ens necessarium

nentheism and theism. >> I guess, even between theists, there are different ways to define the >> concept "God". And certainly the concept "nothing": Might well be, that it >> merely exist for concept in capitalism? (Sorry for that, Edwina, but I just >&g

[PEIRCE-L] CSP: "A man could not have any idea that was not anthropomorphic," was, Ens necessarium

premiss [ an apriori >> belief in a god]. >> >> JAS - I don’t think you and I are going to get anywhere in this >> discussion - and don’t see the point of its continuation. You have your way >> of reading Peirce and I have my way - >> >> Edwina >> >

Re: [PEIRCE-L] "Is God Sustainable?" by Eugene Halton

nization was retarded in growth. … Best, Gary R On Wed, Aug 7, 2024 at 6:01 PM Gary Richmond wrote: > List, > > Eugene (Gene) Halton, Professor Emeritus (University of Notre Dame), a > well-known sociologist and philosopher who has written extensively on the > problematic na

Re: [PEIRCE-L] "Is God Sustainable?" by Eugene Halton

a general interpretation of non-local non-stimuli (vs "a specific actual >> noun; an individual interpretation of local stimuli as referenced to a >> general law," when we say of evolution, "That's --in part-- what we mean by >> God," that continu

Re: [PEIRCE-L] "Is God Sustainable?" by Eugene Halton

aper, "Notes Toward a Definition of Philosophy" ( > https://www.jstor.org/stable/41974893)--reading "the scriptures of the > tradition" as the basis for properly interpreting "the book of nature." In > the famous formulation by Anselm of Canterbury (echoing A

Re: [PEIRCE-L] "Is God Sustainable?" by Eugene Halton

he world is God) and panentheism >(the world is in God). > > This is not to say that proponents of pantheism or panentheism--or, for > that matter, deism or atheism--cannot draw relevant insights from Peirce's > writings; only that his own position, by his own unambiguous

Re: [PEIRCE-L] "Is God Sustainable?" by Eugene Halton

asis for the validity of > the method of science in inquiry--it is intrinsically self-correcting in > the long run. > > Regards, > > Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA > Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian > www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmi

[PEIRCE-L] Peirce and Cosmological Mysticism, or, Radical Religious Universalism

hile to repair / update all the links! ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . ► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with UNSUBSCRI

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Leadership as Relation by Dr. Martin Kettlehut

haven´t been interested in > before, because I was for the spiritual branch in religions, and against > the prophetist branch. But the way he puts it, I can accept his limited > approvement of prophets (leadership). > > Best Regards, Helmut > > > *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 08. Augu

[PEIRCE-L] Leadership as Relation by Dr. Martin Kettlehut

nt to be done in the world today than moving towards leadership *as relation*, and this book offers a blueprint on how we might do that.” Best, Gary Richmond _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ARISBE: THE PEIRCE GATEWAY is now at https://cspeirce.com and, just as well, at https://www.cspeirce.com . It'

[PEIRCE-L] "Is God Sustainable?" by Eugene Halton

IRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . ► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the message and nothing in the body. More at https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html . ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and co-managed by him and Ben Udell.

[PEIRCE-L] Fwd: Reminder: 2024-2025 Charles S. Peirce Essay Prize - deadline August 15

FYI [image: Header: The Charles S. Peirce Society] Dear Gary Richmond This is a friendly reminder that submissions for the 2024-2025 Peirce Essay Prize are due by* August 15, 2024*. Please feel free to share this information with anyone who you think might be interested in submitting! Details

Re: [PEIRCE-L] the logic of vagueness

e ignore its general significance. We neglect the social impulse. > > The essence of pragmatism, I would say, lies in grasping not only that > there is no scientific practice independent of the open system, wherein > we can draw probabilistic inferences based on hypotheses and inductions, &

[PEIRCE-L] Fwd: Submit your paper to the 2025 Central Division meeting

N PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . ► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the message and nothing in the body. More at https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-sign

Re: [PEIRCE-L] the logic of vagueness

> what people believe these days, however implausible to scientific (or even > common) sense, they can find sources online that will reinforce their > beliefs. Personally i'm not optimistic that semiotics can do much to > reverse the trend of the Anthropocene. Maybe we can hope tha

Re: [PEIRCE-L] the logic of vagueness

aabeg > > } Everything is involved which can be evolved. [Peirce] { > > https://gnusystems.ca/wp/ }{ Turning Signs <https://gnusystems.ca/TS/> > > > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > ARISBE: THE PEIRCE GATEWAY is now at > https://cspeirce.com and, just as well, at > h

Re: [PEIRCE-L] the logic of vagueness

}{ Turning Signs <https://gnusystems.ca/TS/> > > > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > ARISBE: THE PEIRCE GATEWAY is now at > https://cspeirce.com and, just as well, at > https://www.cspeirce.com . It'll take a while to repair / update all the > links! > ► PEIRCE-L subs

[PEIRCE-L] List moderator;s request for a pause in the 'mark' v. 'tone' discussion, Classifying Signs (was Mark Token Type)

e has always been that Peirce-L be as self-moderating as possible. But sometimes forms of participant *immoderation* calls for the moderator to step in the interest of the health of the List. I am doing so now. Best, Gary Richmond (writing as Peirce-L moderator, co-manager with Ben Udell) _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Classifying Signs (was Mark Token Type)

*] itself [is] a mere form, an > abstraction, a "general," or as I call it a "[would]-be", i.e. something > which [would] be if conditions were otherwise than they are; and in that > respect it [is] just like a "*word*,"--*any* word, say *camel*. > > > Af

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Classifying Signs (was Mark Token Type)

list.iupui.edu . > ► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to > l...@list.iupui.edu with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the > message and nothing in the body. More at > https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html . > ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and > co-managed by him and Ben Udell. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ARISBE: THE PEIRCE GATEWAY is now at https://cspeirce.com and, just as well, at https://www.cspeirce.com . It'll take a while to repair / update all the links! ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . ► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the message and nothing in the body. More at https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html . ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and co-managed by him and Ben Udell.

[PEIRCE-L] Tone, Token, Type, was, Mark Token Type

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > ARISBE: THE PEIRCE GATEWAY is now at > https://cspeirce.com and, just as well, at > https://www.cspeirce.com . It'll take a while to repair / update all the > links! > ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON &

[PEIRCE-L] Tone Token Type, was Mark Token Type

hen", from the "then" >> to the "if". I added this, because I think, a certain kind of manifestation >> of the categories is composition (1ns), determination (2ns), and >> classification (3ns). >> >> Best regards >> Helmut >> > _

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Mark Token Type

being an > example of the logical fallacy of 'appeal to authority’ to which you have > made reference, - such doesn’t make his comments any more valid than those > of other people on the list. > > Edwina > > On Apr 12, 2024, at 11:21 PM, Gary Richmond > wrote: > &

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Mark Token Type

he word 'tone' more >>> often, mainly in obscure MSS. That is not a ringing endorsement. >>> >>> But we must remember that Tony Jappy also chose the word 'mark' for the >>> triad (mark token type). And he has devoted years of research to the

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Panel on Semiotic Exploration of Ecology at the 2024 Warsaw IASS-AIS World Congress

l, at > https://www.cspeirce.com . It'll take a while to repair / update all the > links! > ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON > PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to > peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . > ► To UNSUBSCR

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Mark Token Type

vide, and "for the first time," a list of all the passages where Peirce uses not only 'tone', but its variants (such as 'tuone' and 'potisgin'). John, on the other hand, has kept repeating his opinions with little textual support. So I ask each member of this

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Mark Token Type

er flaunt their independence from such ethical and collegial practices as Ransdell outlined. It will no longer be tolerated, and those who have previously been warned their anti-collegial conduct on the List jeopardizes their continuation on Peirce-L. In short, they will be removed without further on

[PEIRCE-L] Fwd: [teadus.biosemiotics:9385] ONE-DAY CONFERENCE ON SEMIOTIC AGENCY IN CELEBRATION OF ALEXEI SHAROV´S 70TH ANNIVERSARY

dy. More at https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html . ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and co-managed by him and Ben Udell.

[PEIRCE-L] Fwd: [teadus.biosemiotics:9384] Unresolved problems in biosemiotics

sympa/help/user-signoff.html . ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and co-managed by him and Ben Udell.

[PEIRCE-L] Fwd: The Charles S. Peirce Society Newsletter 8:1 - March/April 2024

, news of Society sessions and speakers at the 2024 World Congress of Philosophy being held in Rome this August, and much else. Gary Richmond, Moderator of Peirce-L The Charles S. Peirce Society Newsletter 8:1 [image: Header: The Charles S. Peirce Society] Dear Gary Richmond Internationally

[PEIRCE-L] The passing of Don D. Roberts and his wife Beverly Kent

.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html . ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and co-managed by him and Ben Udell.

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce's Letter to Risteen (was Higher-Order Logics)

Peirce wrote a great deal > about possibility and necessity, but he never used his 1903 modal logic for > any of that. > > Once again, Peirce's logic is at the forefront of 21st C developments. > > John > > > -- > *From*: "Ga

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce's Letter to Risteen (was Higher-Order Logics)

thing from the distant past is revived and becomes >> a big success. Peirce has an unusually large percentage of successful >> revivals. His Delta graphs are among them. I recognized their importance, >> because I have used and worked with similar logics from the late 20th and

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Problems in mixing quantifiers with modal logic (was Delta Existential Graphs

e > assumptions of reductionism, determinism, and materialism. > > Regards, > > Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA > Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian > <http://www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt> > www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt / twit

Re:[PEIRCE-L]

ssentially a metaphysical doctrine. Best, Gary On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 3:04 AM Michael Shapiro wrote: > Gary, > > I think that using the participial form gives the correct notion of > *process* involved in reaching the state of idealism. > > M. > > -Original M

[PEIRCE-L] Mathematical Proof of Peirce's Reduction Thesis; and Valental Graphs

ply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . ► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the message and nothing in the body. More at https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html . ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and co-managed by him and Ben Udell.

[PEIRCE-L] Commens

nd running until I get it all done. Please alert Ben if you encounter any errors on Commens. Best, Gary Richmond (writing as co-manager of Arisbe with Ben Udell) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ARISBE: THE PEIRCE GATEWAY is now at https://cspeirce.com and, just as well, at https://www.cspeirce.com . It

Re: [PEIRCE-L] The Proper Way in Logic (was Peirce's Ongoing Semiotic Project)

GR On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 7:31 PM Gary Richmond wrote: > John, List, > > JFS: More mathematicians today follow Cantor than Peirce. > > And not only today but in Peirce's day as well. Peirce referred to > Cantor's conception as a "pseudo-continuum," a "

Re: [PEIRCE-L] The Proper Way in Logic (was Peirce's Ongoing Semiotic Project)

the list who question your insistence that 3ns = intentionality. I haven't anything to add to what Edwina, Mike, and now Jon has written except to note that even Tom Short in his book on Peire's semeiotic goes no further than to say that "the intentionality of thought is a special c

Re: [PEIRCE-L] The Proper Way in Logic (was Peirce's Ongoing Semiotic Project)

Peircean Informational Perspective: Contributions to Biosemiotics; L.F. Barbosa da Silveira, M.E. Quilici Gonzalez.- 8. The Life of Symbols and Other Legisigns: More than a mere Metaphor?; W. Nöth.- 9. Signs without Minds; J. Collier.- 10. Dicent Symbols and Proto-propositions in Biological Mimicry; J.

Re: [PEIRCE-L] The Proper Way in Logic (was Peirce's Ongoing Semiotic Project)

onsiderable interest -- and I know that you aren't either, Jon. But I'd be most interested in what you or others on the List might think regarding the generalization of Peirce's furthest thinking as regards propositions into the natural world. Best, Gary Richmond On Sat, Feb 10, 2

Re: [PEIRCE-L] The Proper Way in Logic (was Peirce's Ongoing Semiotic Project)

length that which was succinctly -- albeit abstractly -- posited in that single sentence I just added emphasis to above. As usual, quotations and examples proved extremely helpful. Best, Gary Richmond On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 2:40 PM Jon Alan Schmidt wrote: > Gary, List: > > G

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peirce's Ongoing Semiotic Project, was, Re: Interpretants, as analyzed and discussed by T. L. Short

hts. It leads to the recognition that every name in a proposition is a subject that indexically denotes one of its objects, while its syntax is the pure predicate that iconically signifies its interpretant as the general form of their logical relations Best, Gary Richmond On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 7:57

[PEIRCE-L] Peirce's Ongoing Semiotic Project, was, Re: Interpretants, as analyzed and discussed by T. L. Short

g useful." John seems to be basically advocating ignoring anything that Peirce wrote unless it is somehow relevant to "the latest developments in cognitive science." Doing so suggests that he is employing the methods of tenacity and authority rather than the method of science. Best, Gary Ri

[PEIRCE-L] Recently published: The Oxford Handbook of Charles S. Peirce

ssage. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . ► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the message and nothing in the body. More at https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html . ► PEIRCE-L is ow

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Interpretants

.org/wiki/C._S._Peirce> and markedness, treating it "as species of interpretant" in Peirce's sign–object–interpretant triad. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markedness I do not know Edna Andrew's work in this area. Best, Gary Richmond On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 1:25 PM Edwina Tabor

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Interpretants

es which interest them and which they see potential value in pursuing. To suggest otherwise is to "block the way of inquiry." Best, Gary Richmond On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 4:30 PM John F Sowa wrote: > Edwina, Jon AS, Jon A, Helmut, List, > > Peirce made immense contributions to

[PEIRCE-L] New OUP Prize for Teaching with Technology Announced

body. More at https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html . ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and co-managed by him and Ben Udell.

[PEIRCE-L] The highest good does not exist, but is real

thout science is blind. They are interdependent and have a common goal—the search for truth." "Through my pursuit in science I have known cosmic religious feelings." "The world needs new moral impulses which, I’m afraid, won’t come from the churches, heavily compromised as t

Re: [PEIRCE-L] interpretant and thirdness

ication, and there are additional trichotomies for the dyadic > relations of the sign to its external objects and interpretants (dynamical > and final), as well as the triadic relation of the sign to its genuine > object (dynamical) and interpretant (final). > > Regards, > > Jon &

Re: [PEIRCE-L] interpretant and thirdness

ate all the > links! > ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON > PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to > peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . > ► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to > l...@list.iupui.edu w

Re: [PEIRCE-L] [teadus.biosemiotics:9377] CFP. Traces of Extinction. (Tartu, Estonia, 5-7 June 2024)

nk: https://www.ecosem.ut.ee/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Extension_CFP_Traces-of-Extinction_2.pdf The same information was available in the conference homepage under the second link (it was just a shortcut). Kind wishes, Timo On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 11:34 AM Gary Richmond wrote: > FYI GR > > Dear a

[PEIRCE-L] Fwd: [teadus.biosemiotics:9377] CFP. Traces of Extinction. (Tartu, Estonia, 5-7 June 2024)

LINE of the message and nothing in the body. More at https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html . ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and co-managed by him and Ben Udell.

[PEIRCE-L] Test (ignore)

in the SUBJECT LINE of the message and nothing in the body. More at https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html . ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and co-managed by him and Ben Udell.

[PEIRCE-L] Peirce → Lady Welby → Ramsey → Wittgenstein

;Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . ► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the message and nothing in the body. More at https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html . ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and co-managed by him and Ben Udell.

[PEIRCE-L] Fwd: [teadus.biosemiotics:9376] CFP. Traces of Extinction. (Tartu, Estonia, 5-7 June 2024)

ps://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html . ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and co-managed by him and Ben Udell.

Re: [PEIRCE-L] AI’s greatest lie and greatest success

such tools as ChatGPT, it does not seem to me to have relevance here. No doubt there are any number of other lists-serves where discussions of AI are pertinent. Best, Gary Richmond (writing as list moderator) On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 4:03 PM John F Sowa wrote: > A recent article contains a

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Categories for states and processes

gt;> been an object of interest before somebody had showed interest, has it? >> >> Best Regards! >> >> Helmut >> > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON > PEIRCE-L to this message. P

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Objects and Perception (was God and the Universe (was The Thing In Itself))

aborsky (among others) telling me of such >> things (and JAS has, himself, with Gangle, Colapietro, et al) gone into the >> mechanics of this extensively. Would just wonder what people make of it >> from within the Peircean semeiotic, now, not so much as to thing in >> itself's

Re: [PEIRCE-L] A question for pragmatists, was, Comments on the nature and purpose of Peirce-L, was, The Basis of Synechism in Phaneroscopy

s for many a newer meaning - (AB) institutional change, effected by intelligent reform of social institutions. That is pragmatism, as it’s meaningful to me. I think we lost that Deweyan definition. Bring it back. Atila On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 1:04 AM Gary Richmond wrote: > Mart

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Peircean Linguistics

s is* [co-author, Michael C. Haley],” > *American > Speech*, 77 (2002), 305-312. > > 25. “Is an Icon Iconic?,” *Language*, 84 (2008), 815-819. > > 26. “Roman Jakobson in Retrospect: Unvarnished Remembrances of a > Stiff-NeckedStudent,” *Chinese Semiotic Studies*, 14 (2018), 41-56

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Chat GPT and Peirce

etence up from there, > and so can skip the human grammar-module". But that neither is witchcraft, > nor does it say, that there is no human-genetic grammar-module. And I too > hope with the Linguist, that we dont have to fear ChatGPT more than we have > to fear a refrigerator. >

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Is anyone familiar with this book by Tursman?

to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to > peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . > ► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to > l...@list.iupui.edu with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the > message and nothing in the body. More at > https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-sig

Re: [PEIRCE-L] A question for pragmatists

t;> characteristics of an individual): >> >> Leader (qua essential way of being) - Follower(s)/Led (qua actual object) >> - Future (qua indeterminate interpretant). >> >> I’m a big fan of your and Ben’s chapter in "Peirce in His Own Words" on >>

[PEIRCE-L] A question for pragmatists, was, Comments on the nature and purpose of Peirce-L, was, The Basis of Synechism in Phaneroscopy

tension of pluralism > in social media platforms, relativism gone wild in the interpretation of > the law, the conundrums of individualism for economics, and rampant > nihilism in every sector? > > > > Thank you for considering, > > > Martin W. Kettelhut, PhD > Listeni

[PEIRCE-L] Comments on the nature and purpose of Peirce-L, was, The Basis of Synechism in Phaneroscopy

so as to read: Comments on the nature and purpose of Peirce-L, was, Re: [PEIRCE-L] The Basis of Synechism in Phaneroscopy. Either is acceptable.) Gary Richmond (writing as moderator of peirce-l) On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 12:43 PM Jon Alan Schmidt wrote: > List: > > I agree with

Re: [PEIRCE-L] The Basis of Synechism in Phaneroscopy

f law. But at any assignable date in the past, however > early, there was already some tendency toward uniformity; and at any > assignable date in the future there will be some slight aberrancy from law. > (CP 1.409, 1887-8) > > > Thanks, > > Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, US

Re: [PEIRCE-L] The Basis of Synechism in Phaneroscopy

s message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to > peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . > ► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to > l...@list.iupui.edu with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the > message and nothing in the body. More at > https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/u

Re: [PEIRCE-L] The Basis of Synechism in Phaneroscopy

ading to the plausible hypothesis of the reality of God. I would hope that it goes without saying that one does not have to have attended today's 10 minute thesis to jump into the conversation. Best, Gary Richmond On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 10:09 PM Mary Libertin wrote: > Thanks for the

[PEIRCE-L] Fwd: Peirce Society Newsletter 6:2

Dear Gary Richmond, For the past six years, we have been compiling a list of new books and articles published on Charles S. Peirce for this newsletter. We are continually impressed by the quality of the research and the liveliness of the Peirce community. Across the world, from China to the

[PEIRCE-L] Fwd: Peirce Society Newsletter 6:2

RCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the message and nothing in the body. More at https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html . ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and co-managed by him and Ben Udell.

[PEIRCE-L] Memorial for Shea Zellweger

excellent Wikipedia article on him and his work here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shea_Zellweger Best, Gary “Let everything happen to you Beauty and terror Just keep going No feeling is final” ― Rainer Maria Rilke *Gary Richmond* *Philosophy and Critical Thinking* *Communication Studies*

[PEIRCE-L] Fwd: John Lachs Retirement Event

fyi John Lachs Retirement Event John Lachs Retirement Event View this email in your browser <https://mailchi.mp/0569ebaf/john-lachs-retirement-event?e=860edf35dc> [image: Header: The Charles S. Peirce Society] Dear Gary Richmond, Below, please find an announcement regarding an

[PEIRCE-L] Fwd: Call for Abstracts | The Pragmatic Maxim

Call for Abstracts | The Pragmatic Maxim Call for Abstracts | The Pragmatic Maxim [image: Header: The Charles S. Peirce Society] Dear Gary Richmond, The Charles S. Peirce Society endeavors to organize a panel for the Pacific APA, to be held in San Francisco from April 5–8, 2023. The planned

[PEIRCE-L] Fwd: Final CFP: Charles S. Peirce Essay Prize

the SUBJECT LINE of the message and nothing in the body. More at https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html . ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and co-managed by him and Ben Udell.

[PEIRCE-L] Fwd: Second CFP: Peirce Essay Prize

BSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the message and nothing in the body. More at https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html . ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and co-managed by him and Ben Udell.

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >