Re: [Gimp-user] Re: GimpShop

2005-04-03 Thread Eric Pierce
Even with the Mnot bit?

On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 10:57:11AM -0700, Tom Williams wrote:
 David Herman wrote:
 
 (snip)
 
 Not to disparrage the hard work that was put into this hack but...
 Let gimp be gimp and photoshop be photoshop.
 
 I completely agree.
 
 Peace...
 
 Tom
 
 ___
 Gimp-user mailing list
 Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
 http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] GimpShop

2005-04-01 Thread Eric Pierce
I tried it and didn't see any changes to the interface.  GimpShop only 
rearranges the menu structure to emulate Photoshop's a little closer.

It's really meant for a PS user who is transitioning to the Gimp.  If you're 
familar w/the Gimp, there's no need to use it (correct me if I'm wrong).

Eric P.

On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 03:44:58PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
 
 
 
 Those who crave a PhotoShop interface almost finally have it.  :)
 
 Thanks for the link.  I will pass on this..
 
 Peace...
 
 Tom
 
 
 

  wayne 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
  Sent by:   To 
  gimp-user-bounces gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
  @lists.xcf.berkel  cc 
  ey.edu
Subject 
[Gimp-user] GimpShop
  04/01/2005 11:26  
  AM




 
 
 
 
 Anyone tried GimpShop yet? Just wondering what the buzz is all about.
 
 http://plasticbugs.com/index.php?p=241
 
 Wayne
 ___
 Gimp-user mailing list
 Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
 http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
 
 
 ___
 Gimp-user mailing list
 Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
 http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Why flat Input Levels Histogram in the Levels tool?

2005-03-20 Thread Eric Pierce
In the levels dialog, click the Logarithmic button (upper right).  You have the 
Linear button clicked.

On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 05:30:01PM -0800, Daniel Yek wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 The Input Levels Histogram in the Levels tool used to be a nice bell
 curve as shown in this book:
 http://gimp-savvy.com/BOOK/index.html?node60.html
 
 Since about a year ago, I started to get a flat Input Levels Histogram,
 as shown here:
 http://www.olywa.net/haiou/levelsTool.jpeg
 
 Anybody knows why?
 
 Thanks.
 
 -- 
 Daniel.
 ___
 Gimp-user mailing list
 Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
 http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] remove background

2005-02-21 Thread Eric Pierce
Well, you've got your work cut out for you on the frizzy hair guys, but I've 
had some success using Filters-Colors-Decompose for frizzy haired 
individuals.  Go with RGB separation.  I then pick the layer with the best 
contrast between the hair and the background and massage that into a mask.  The 
rest of the person can be cut out fairly cleanly using paths (and then path to 
selection once path is created).  Once again, stick this into your mask.

On non-frizzy haired individuals (ex. M4110016.JPG), I'd go paths all the way.

Obviously, I'm leaving out a lot of the step details, but let us know if/where 
you get stuck if you need more explanation.

EP
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 09:17:40PM +, Arvid Böttiger wrote:
 I have some pictures here: http://www.fys.ku.dk/~arvid/ and I would like 
 to remove the background so I can copy/paste the persons into another 
 picture.
 But how do I do that when the background contains a lot of coulors - 
 like here: http://www.fys.ku.dk/~arvid/M4110102.JPG
 
 thanks in advance
 ___
 Gimp-user mailing list
 Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
 http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Trouble with layers from psd

2005-02-09 Thread Eric Pierce
One of the admins at my work purportedly uses Macormedia's Fireworks for raster 
image editing.

He told me that the default file format is png!  I called him a bold faced 
lier, but he swears up and down that png is the default format.  I asked him 
about layers, and he said the pngs that Fireworks saves can DO LAYERS.  I 
haven't seen it firsthand... is there any truth to this!?

And getting back to an earlier debate (file format 'lock-in' / divide and 
conquer), I've read somewhere that MS Word stole the word processing scene back 
in the day by:
1) implementing a damn near perfect WordPerfect (word pro leader at the time?) 
import filter but (in)conveniently lacked any WordPerfect output filter.
2) offering Word inexpensively

For what it's worth, I think the Gimp would excel and enlighten if it had the 
best psd import AND export filter as possible.  But I've learned to live with 
the current state of the psd filter at work.  I use Gimp for 95% of my work 
(web devel/print work), and the main print guy uses PS for everything.  The 
times when our work overlaps, I can conveniently save to psd for him from the 
Gimp if layers are an issue, and that has been a decent working solution for 
the 2+ years I've been at my current employment.

Implementing the import/export of a dynamic text layer from psd would be a nice 
addition though.

Eric P.

On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 09:10:14PM -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
 Hi.
 
 So.
 
 TIFF format can have layers, and that is documented (although just 
 using the 'normal' blending mode).
 
 Can Photoshop work with layered TIFF's?
 
 I think the support for layers in TIFFs is a lot easier to achieve 
 than trying to figure out the PSD file, since the TIFF standard is 
 documented, and that would be a good format for interchange of 
 layered images.
 
 What do you say?
 
   JS
   --
 ___
 Gimp-user mailing list
 Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
 http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] File browser preview?

2005-01-14 Thread Eric Pierce
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 08:57:20PM -0500, BandiPat wrote:
 On Friday 14 January 2005 03:53 pm, BandiPat wrote:
  Hi all,
  I seem to remember some discussion about this once, but not sure.  It
  may have been more yelling about the new file browser look than
  anything too.  ;o)
 
  Anyway, is it still possible to get a mini preview window for the
  files you intend to load?  That was in the earlier Gnome  Gimp, but
  I can't seem to find it now, if it's still available.  Some other
  local users here say they still have it with Gimp 2.0.x versions, but
  I'm not sure what version of Gnome files they are running.  I think
  mine are 2.6 presently and maybe it's just 2.8 that has the preview
  now?
 
  Thanks,
  Patrick
 =
 
 Ok, I'm adding more to my email. since I have learned more since asking 
 the original question.  It seems that SuSE has done something to their 
 build of Gimp 2.0.4 that is provided with 9.2 that disables the preview 
 pane in the file browser.  In looking at their src rpm, I find, what 
 looks like a file added to disable that.
 
 Now, next question?  Anyone know of a new 2.2.2 Gimp rpm for SuSE 9.2?  
 I tried compiling, but something happened during the configure that I 
 haven't seen before and it failed horribly!  I'll try again later, but 
 in the mean time, if anyone knows where to find a good rpm already 
 compiled for SuSE 9.2, that will work for me too.  ;o)
 
 regards,
 Patrick
 

I think you'll need to compile GTK and friends first.  Then the Gimp.

EP
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] File browser preview?

2005-01-14 Thread Eric Pierce
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 10:02:22PM -0500, BandiPat wrote:
 On Friday 14 January 2005 09:32 pm, Eric Pierce wrote:
 [...]
   =
  
   Ok, I'm adding more to my email. since I have learned more since
   asking the original question.  It seems that SuSE has done
   something to their build of Gimp 2.0.4 that is provided with 9.2
   that disables the preview pane in the file browser.  In looking at
   their src rpm, I find, what looks like a file added to disable
   that.
  
   Now, next question?  Anyone know of a new 2.2.2 Gimp rpm for SuSE
   9.2? I tried compiling, but something happened during the configure
   that I haven't seen before and it failed horribly!  I'll try again
   later, but in the mean time, if anyone knows where to find a good
   rpm already compiled for SuSE 9.2, that will work for me too.  ;o)
  
   regards,
   Patrick
 
  I think you'll need to compile GTK and friends first.  Then the Gimp.
 
  EP
  ___
 
 Thanks, Eric, but GTK is installed  GTK2 as well.
I meant to say recompile.  
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Alt+ shortcuts

2005-01-02 Thread Eric Pierce
Is 'PreferencesInterfaceShow menu mneumonics' checked on?

On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 10:12:16PM +0100, Aewyn wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 as for gimp 2.2 I can not use any shotcuts with Alt. (like Altx)
 In gimp 2.0 it works well. 
 
 I don't know if it is a bug or a feature, but it would be
 fine to use shortcuts with Alt.
 
 Thanks, Aewyn.
 ___
 Gimp-user mailing list
 Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
 http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
___
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] ANNOUNCE: GNU Image Manipulation Program 2.2.0

2004-12-20 Thread Eric Pierce
 
 Hi all developers,
 
 Maybe, between all the critical remarks and questions, it's time again 
 to thank you all for this magnificent work.

---
I second that.  Your gift of time and talent are immeasurable, and whole 
heartedly appreciated!

The progress you've made since 1.2 (when I started using Gimp) has been 
astounding; I have personally benefitted greatly from all the improvements in 
the usability sphere.  I use Gimp everyday at work (web devel/print work) and 
have PS installed, but I find I rarely need to use it as Gimp is so damn able.  
Our department wasn't willing to foot the bill for another PS license for a 
co-worker, so I clued her in to the Gimp and she's 100% happy with it.

---
Quick random screenshot.
http://epierce.freeshell.org/images/gimp.png

I've put everything into one window which cuts down drastically on alt-tabbing. 
 I have shortcuts for all the tools I use on a regular basis, so I've opted to 
remove all tool icons (as cool as they were to look at).

---
insert touchy feely Gimp poetry here 

---
Keep up the great work!

Forever indebted,
Eric Pierce
 
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Curving an image

2004-11-09 Thread Eric Pierce
Filters - Distorts - Curve Bend


On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 03:44:52PM -0800, Barton Bosch wrote:
 What are the best ways to take an image of a straight line and bend 
 it into an s-curve with The GIMP?  I have tried the perspective and 
 shear tools as well as the distort-curve bend filter without 
 producing an ideal result.
 
 Are there other options?  I'd like to be able to set some points and 
 pull them around with the mouse similar to the UI for the path tool.
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Barton
 ___
 Gimp-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] image scale (2.2) - missing print size

2004-11-09 Thread Eric Pierce
Would this new 'Print Size' dialog have its own 'Resolution' setting?

Eric P.

On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 03:13:12PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Eric Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  So you'll also be moving Resolution from Scale Image, correct?
 
 No. The resolution entries would stay in the Scale Image dialog.  I
 said the plan was to not change the Scale Image dialog at all and add
 an additional dialog to set the Print Size.
 
 
 Sven
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] image scale (2.2) - missing print size

2004-11-09 Thread Eric Pierce
Ulp... my mistake.

You laid it out perfectly in your initial email.  I just lost it somewhere in 
the thread.
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 02:14:08AM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Eric Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Would this new 'Print Size' dialog have its own 'Resolution' setting?
 
 Am I really that bad at describing things? The only thing you can
 configure in Print Size would be the resolution. There would be two
 entries to set the resolution (horziontal and vertical) and two
 entries to choose the print dimensions (width and height). Changing
 the print width or height will only affect the resolution, nothing
 else.
 
 
 Sven
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] image scale (2.2) - missing print size

2004-11-08 Thread Eric Pierce
So you'll also be moving Resolution from Scale Image, correct?

For what it's worth, I did a good 2 minutes of research on this topic to see 
what the other softies are doing for a Print Size type dialog.

Here:
http://epierce.freeshell.org/gimp/print_size_research_results.php

I see good arguements for two 'print size/resolution' location ideas.

#1 Returning it as it was in =2.0 because...
 - Everybody else has 'pixel scaling' and 'print size' in the same dialog, 
 - People are accustomed to Gimp also having these entries together as they've 
been that way a long time
 - one less menu entry = one less menu entry to wade through

#2 Putting it into its own menu entry (Sven's idea below) because... 
 - Having 'Print Size/resolution' settings in w/Interpolation settings really 
doesn't make sense
 - Gimp is NOT about what everybody else is doing - fock 'em

That said, I vote for idea #2, and I vote for Print Size for the vernacular.

I'd be curious to hear from others on this topic who use Gimp mostly for print 
work.  

Eric P.


On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 12:48:44PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
 Hi,
 
 we spent some more thoughts on this and discussed the topic on #gimp.
 Let me present the current plan and ask you for comments. I'd like to
 get it right this time since we should try to avoid further string
 changes before 2.2.0...
 
 So the plan is to keep the Scale Image dialog as is and to add a new
 dialog called Print Size which will allow to change the image
 resolution (and nothing else). It should offer two entries to specify
 the print size in physical units and two entries to specify the print
 resolution (linked with a chain-button since you will usually want to
 change both values at the same time).
 
 Does that make any sense? Is Print Size a good name for the dialog
 and it's menu entry?
 
 
 Sven
 ___
 Gimp-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] image scale (2.2) - missing print size

2004-11-06 Thread Eric Pierce
On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 01:03:52PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Eric Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Will the 'print size width/height' fields be returning to the Scale
  Image dialog?
 
 Would it perhaps be better to also remove the Resolution entries from
 the Scale dialog and add a new dialog Image-Change Print Size ? The
 fact that you had to use the Scale dialog for changing the resolution
 has always been a source of confusion. Perhaps a different dialog
 would be a good way to solve that problem w/o ending up with a
 cluttered Scale dialog again?
 
Sure.  That actually makes the most sense.

Eric
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] flat image bg color change

2004-11-01 Thread Eric Pierce
There are a billion different ways to do what you're talking about.  But it really 
comes down to the quality/properties of the image you have.

Show us what you have.

 
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 01:13:21AM -0500, Tom wrote:
 (new to gimp)
 
 Hi,
 
 I would like to change the background color of a photo,
 (preferably with a gradient or shadow effect)
 but it's a single layer (jpg).  I tried to 'select by color'
 and replace it, but the edges of the object in the foreground
 turn out jagged and looks bad.  I also tried to invert the
 selection and cut and paste it into a new image file, but it looks
 just as bad.
 
 Any ideas would be appreciated.
 
 Thanks,
 Tom
 
 ___
 Gimp-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Copy from Gimp to OpenOffice Draw

2004-10-19 Thread Eric Pierce
Not quite as easy, but save the image in Gimp and then Insert - Picture in OOo.  

Or in Windows land, do a 'copy to clipboard' in Gimp and simply paste in OOo.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 08:19:41PM +0200, Pau Cabot wrote:
 Hi to everybody,
 
 I cannot copy an image from Gimp 2.0 to OpenOffice Draw. I'm not the 
 only one that has this problem, as I have found this page in internet:
 http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2004-10-10-002-26-RV-SW-0002
 
 Can somebody help me?
 
 Thank you, Pau.
 
 PS. Gimp 2.0, OpenOffice 1.1, Suse Linux 9.1
 ___
 Gimp-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Prob compiling 2.1.5

2004-09-28 Thread Eric Pierce
I got it.  My system still thought gdk-pixbuf.loaders was in usr/local (after 
compiling gtk myself) even though it wasn't.  Rebooting refreshed something so it 
found the files in /opt from the gtk rpm. 

Thanks,
Eric P.

On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 10:58:24PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Eric Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  gimpstock.c:303: error: `stock_anchor_16' undeclared here (not in a function)
  gimpstock.c:303: error: initializer element is not constant
 
 gdk-pixbuf-csource is not working correctly, probably because the
 gdk-pixbuf modules file wasn't installed. Check if
 ${sysconfdir}/gtk-2.0/gdk-pixbuf.loaders exists and if so, if the
 pixbuf loaders referenced there do actually exist.
 
 
 Sven
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] new transparency entry

2004-09-28 Thread Eric Pierce
Yeah, I just found it listed under 'Configure Keyboard Shortcuts'.  That's probably 
good enough for a function like this.

On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 10:34:11AM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Eric Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Can we add (copy over) the 'Keep transparency' checkbox from the
  layer dialog as a menu entry?  Here: Layer - Transparency - Keep
  transparency
 
 Have a look at menus/image-menu.xml.in in a recent CVS HEAD checkout
 or in 2.1.5. There's a commented out Layer Properties menu that has
 this and some other entries. We haven't yet figured out how useful
 these would be in the menu. Some feedback could be helpful.
 
 
 Sven
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Prob compiling 2.1.5

2004-09-27 Thread Eric Pierce
I just installed a boatload of updated (built for SuSE) rpms from 
www.usr-local-bin.org. 

Here's what I installed:
atk-1.8.0-100.SuSE.ulb.1.i586.rpm
atk-devel-1.8.0-100.SuSE.ulb.1.i586.rpm
glib2-2.4.6-100.SuSE.ulb.1.i586.rpm
glib2-devel-2.4.6-100.SuSE.ulb.1.i586.rpm
gtk2-2.4.10-100.SuSE.ulb.1.i586.rpm
gtk2-devel-2.4.10-100.SuSE.ulb.1.i586.rpm
gtk2-engines-2.2.0-400.SuSE.ulb.2.i586.rpm
libcroco-0.6.0-100.SuSE.ulb.1.i586.rpm
libcroco-devel-0.6.0-100.SuSE.ulb.1.i586.rpm
librsvg-2.7.2-100.SuSE.ulb.1.i586.rpm
librsvg-devel-2.7.2-100.SuSE.ulb.1.i586.rpm
pango-1.6.0-100.SuSE.ulb.1.i586.rpm
pango-devel-1.6.0-100.SuSE.ulb.1.i586.rpm

And here's where 'make' is pooping out:
 gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I/opt/gnome/include/gtk-2.0 
-I/opt/gnome/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/opt/gnome/include/atk-1.0 
-I/opt/gnome/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/freetype2 
-I/usr/include/freetype2/config -I/opt/gnome/include/glib-2.0 
-I/opt/gnome/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/local/include 
-DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\LibGimpWidgets\ -DGIMP_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -DG_DISABLE_DEPRECATED 
-DGDK_PIXBUF_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -DGDK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -DGDK_MULTIHEAD_SAFE 
-DGTK_MULTIHEAD_SAFE -g -O2 -Wall -MT gimpstock.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/gimpstock.Tpo -c 
gimpstock.c  -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/gimpstock.o
gimpstock.c:303: error: `stock_anchor_16' undeclared here (not in a function)
gimpstock.c:303: error: initializer element is not constant
gimpstock.c:303: error: (near initialization for 
`gimp_stock_button_pixbufs[0].inline_data')
gimpstock.c:303: error: initializer element is not constant
gimpstock.c:303: error: (near initialization for `gimp_stock_button_pixbufs[0]')
gimpstock.c:304: error: `stock_duplicate_16' undeclared here (not in a function)
gimpstock.c:304: error: initializer element is not constant
gimpstock.c:304: error: (near initialization for 
`gimp_stock_button_pixbufs[1].inline_data')
gimpstock.c:304: error: initializer element is not constant
gimpstock.c:304: error: (near initialization for `gimp_stock_button_pixbufs[1]')
gimpstock.c:305: error: `stock_edit_16' undeclared here (not in a function)
gimpstock.c:305: error: initializer element is not constant
...

Any ideas?

Thanks for reading,
Eric Pierce
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] new transparency entry

2004-09-27 Thread Eric Pierce
Quick request.

Can we add (copy over) the 'Keep transparency' checkbox from the layer dialog as a 
menu entry?
Here:
Layer - Transparency - Keep transparency

Thanks,
Eric P.
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Thoughts about channels

2004-09-21 Thread Eric Pierce
 And please, try
 to be less aggressive on this mailing-list. If you want to, you can
 continue your pointless rants elsewhere but please let this list be a
 friendly place where GIMP users and developers can exchange their
 ideas and experiences and help each others.

a-fucking-greed (i.e., 'agreed!').

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Dependency (GTK/Glib) compile probs

2004-09-21 Thread Eric Pierce
This is probably insanely simple.

I'm trying to compile 2.1.5, so I had to update glib (2.4.6) on my system which I did 
with '--enable-shared' config flag.  All went well.

Then, gtk 2.4.9 configured (with --enable-shared) fine, but during 'make' it exists 
out looking for /opt/gnome/lib/libgobject-2.0.la which glib placed here: 
/usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.la

What config option do I need to tell gtk where libgobject-2.0.la is now?

I know this is really a question for GTK's mailing list, but I don't feel like budging 
from the cozy comform of the gimp list.

Any help appreciated!
Eric Pierce
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] PS layer mode read incorectly in Gimp

2004-09-15 Thread Eric Pierce
So I'm loading this psd file in Gimp that my co-worker did, and I notice it looks 
funny because the top layer mode was interpreted wrong by the Gimp.  
Here's the image.
http://epierce.freeshell.org/bugzilla/soft_light.psd

The top layer in this image is 'Soft Light' when loaded in Photoshop, but comes up 
'Addition' under Gimp 2.0.4.  Of course, I can manually switch it to 'Soft Light' and 
it looks like what my co-worker probably intended.

I notice this behavior under Gimp 2.0.4 (Win/Lin).  Under Gimp 2.1.4 (Linux) it comes 
up as 'Overlay'.  It look alright as 'Overlay', but it still probably should be 'Soft 
Light'.

Any ideas any one?  Should I bug report it?

Eric P.
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Photoshop magic background eraser

2004-09-09 Thread Eric Pierce
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 08:14:05AM +0200, David Neary wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Eric Pierce wrote:
  Actually, it'd be nice if Gimp could pick up some of the properties of PS's erase 
  background tool.
 
 Would you mind describing how this tool works? Some screenshots
 would be brilliant. I am guessing that it's an erase tool with
 some kind of edge detection that doesn't delete things not in the
 same region as the starting seed point - is that accurate?

All I know is from a simple search:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=enie=UTF-8q=%22background+eraser%22+photoshopbtnG=Google+Search

And about 5 minutes of reading.
http://www.basicphotoshop.com/tutz/pstutz33.htm

Eric P.
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Photoshop magic background eraser

2004-09-08 Thread Eric Pierce
I use Filter-Color-Color to Alpha

Shit, and I thought Gimp had one up on PS there too.  Luckily, I got 3/4th of our 
marketing department (there's 4 of us) using Gimp because they (and I) didn't think 
you could cleanly remove backgrounds in PS.

Eric P.

On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 05:52:11PM +1000, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
 On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 09:49 +0200, Michael Wagner wrote:
  Good morning,
  
  You can find a magic background eraser in Photshop. How do I do this
  in Gimp? I have version 2.0.4.
 
 What does it do? A lot of people on these lists have not or do not use
 Photoshop, so you'll need to provide a bit of a description.
 
 Cheers,
 Malcolm
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Photoshop magic background eraser

2004-09-08 Thread Eric Pierce
Actually, it'd be nice if Gimp could pick up some of the properties of PS's erase 
background tool.

Adding 'Tolerance' to 'color to alpha' would be good start; and maybe that's all 
that's really necessary for this function. 

How does everybody else remove backgrounds?

The other approaches I take are:
1. decomposing the image and a making mask from the layer with the best separation
2. using the path tool to break out a region and (once again) make a mask

Any techniques I'm missing?
Eric P.

On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 04:32:59AM +, Eric Pierce wrote:
 I use Filter-Color-Color to Alpha
 
 Shit, and I thought Gimp had one up on PS there too.  Luckily, I got 3/4th of our 
 marketing department (there's 4 of us) using Gimp because they (and I) didn't think 
 you could cleanly remove backgrounds in PS.
 
 Eric P.
 
 On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 05:52:11PM +1000, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
  On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 09:49 +0200, Michael Wagner wrote:
   Good morning,
   
   You can find a magic background eraser in Photshop. How do I do this
   in Gimp? I have version 2.0.4.
  
  What does it do? A lot of people on these lists have not or do not use
  Photoshop, so you'll need to provide a bit of a description.
  
  Cheers,
  Malcolm
 ___
 Gimp-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Windows compilation of RawPhoto 0.7

2004-09-02 Thread Eric Pierce
Hi,

First off, thanks for writing this plug-in.  There's some cool RAW options in the 
plugin that I was never knew about when converting RAW images.

Basically, it works for me on Win2000 Pro at work w/the static version of your plugin. 
 I need to try the dynamic one again.  I didn't have dcraw installed at the time I 
tried the dynamically linked binary (didn't know I needed dcraw installed - maybe add 
that to your install instructions and where to copy the dcraw binary in Windows?)

Two things:
1.  Should the top 5 check boxes be radio buttons so only one can be selected?  I 
selected all for shits 'n giggles and saw several conflicting flags being passed to 
dcraw.

2.  It seems your plugin is trying to open any file that Gimp tries to open regardless 
of extension.
Here's a screen:
http://epierce.freeshell.org/multimedia/dcraw.png

On the whole, I'm pleased to be using your plugin/dcraw.  Now I can removed the 
hundreds of megabytes of software that accompanied our camera (Canon G5).

Thanks and I'll report back again,
Eric P.

On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 06:00:36PM -0400, Matthew H. Plough wrote:
 Hi everyone --
 
 I have compiled Paweł T. Jochym's RawPhoto 0.7 ( 
 http://ptj.rozeta.com.pl/Soft/RawPhoto ) for Windows, and need people to 
 test it. The plugin works perfectly on my computer, but I don't know if 
 this will be the case elsewhere. The plugin acts as a GIMP 2.0 front end 
 for dcraw (Windows binary at http://www.insflug.org/raw/ ), which 
 processes RAW digital camera images.
 
 Would anyone be willing to test this plugin on Windows and give me 
 feedback as to how well it works? My compilation is located at 
 http://www.princeton.edu/~mplough/tmp/rawphoto-windows-0.7.zip . I also 
 have a sample image (of a Coast Guard cutter shot from a cruise in 
 Alaska) at http://www.princeton.edu/~mplough/tmp/CRW_0092.CRW .
 
 Thank you,
 Matthew Plough
 ___
 Gimp-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
 
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Chrome Effect

2004-08-18 Thread Eric Pierce
Check this one out.
http://gug.sunsite.dk/tutorials/tomcat16/

On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 11:00:29AM +0100, Gearoid Donnellan wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 I think I may have posted about this before but I dont think I got
 a reply so forgive me for posting again.
 Im pretty new to the Gimp and so far Ive been trying to do some
 photoshop tutorials in it but I am having a major problem getting one
 of the effects the same as in PS.
 The effect is the Chrome one that is in PS. The tool dialog looks like this:
 http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v354/drakonslair/Chrome/chromesetting.jpg
 
 Basically its starts out with a black background with five flares in
 it, one in each corner and one in the center. After the chrome effect
 is applied the image should resemble this:
 http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v354/drakonslair/Chrome/afterstep5.jpg
 
 I want to end up with something that looks like this:
 
 http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v354/drakonslair/Chrome/finaleffect.jpg
 
 I used the Tomcat tutorial to get something similar but its not really
 good enough so I was hoping you could help
 
 Really appreciate any help
 Gerry
 ___
 Gimp-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] glossy transparent buttons tutorial

2004-07-22 Thread Eric Pierce
One more comment...

Can I suggest that you should submit this to either gimp.org or gug.sunsite.dk ?

It's nice having a somewhat central repository of Gimp tutorials instead of them 
scattered all over the web.

See ya!

On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 07:03:43AM +, Gerog Veiz  wrote:
 hi gimp users!
 
 Please have a look at 
 http://de.geocities.com/studio_gmv/
 and tell me what you think about this tutorial.
 I would like to know if it works on gimp 1.2 if someone could try.
 
 kind regards
 gmv
 
 
 _
 15 MB Speicherplatz gratis - Lycos Mail - 15 MB Attachmentgrösse - 
 http://mail.lycos.at
 
 

 ___
 Gimp-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Installing 2.1 w/2.0

2004-07-22 Thread Eric Pierce
Ok, I want to install 2.1 side-by-side with 2.0.

Everyone says to change the prefix (which I've never done before).  Is that as simple 
as this?
./configure --prefix=~\gimp_dev  make  make install

Thanks,
Eric P.
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] missing key shortcuts in 2.1.1

2004-07-18 Thread Eric Pierce
I was trying to update the ps-menurc file (for Photoshop key shortcuts in Gimp) for 
2.1.1, and a few entries seem to be missing from the menurc file.

I'm guessing there's more, but here's what I found so far (2.0.* format):
; (gtk_accel_path Layers/New Layer... )
; (gtk_accel_path Layers/Raise Layer )
; (gtk_accel_path Layers/Lower Layer )
; (gtk_accel_path Layers/Layer to Top )
; (gtk_accel_path Layers/Layer to Bottom )

Also, when I try to dynamically set any of these, Gimp seg faults. 

Let me know if I should bug report this.
Thanks,
Eric Pierce
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Build probs w/2.1

2004-06-10 Thread Eric Pierce
I just upgrade to SuSE 9.1.
I grabbed the following rpms from www.usr-local-bin.org:
gtk-2.4.2 (plus devel)
ATK 1.6.0 (plus devel)
Glib 2.4.2 (plus devel)
Pango 1.4.0 (plus devel)

'configure' goes smoothly, but during 'make' it craps out with the following:
gimpviewable.c: In function `gimp_viewable_get_dummy_pixbuf':
gimpviewable.c:739: error: `stock_question_64' undeclared (first use in
this function)
gimpviewable.c:739: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
gimpviewable.c:739: error: for each function it appears in.)
make[3]: *** [gimpviewable.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/dit/downloads/gimp-2.1.0/app/core'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/dit/downloads/gimp-2.1.0/app'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/dit/downloads/gimp-2.1.0'
make: *** [all] Error 2


I'm stumped.  Any ideas, anyone?
Thanks,
Eric P.
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] [Gimp-developer] volunteer needed for preferences dialog

2004-06-07 Thread Eric Pierce
What do you need done?

 Hi,

 I am forwarding this mail to gimp-user because there hasn't been any
 response on the gimp-developer mailing-list. Perhaps I can reach a
 potential contributor here or at least get some user feedback...


 ___
 Gimp-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] [Gimp-developer] volunteer needed for preferencesdialog

2004-06-07 Thread Eric Pierce
 Sven Neumann wrote:
 Hi,

 Eric Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


What do you need done?


 Huh? The forwarded mail outlines it in all details. Which part did you
 not understand?

 Um, no it doesn't. I just has a short blurb about little response on the
 dev
 mailing list and needing help with the Preferences dialog.

My bad.  I didn't noticed the forwarded e-mail.  I've been so busy at work
lately that I now skip every 3rd word in e-mails, so that must've been
where I missed it.

I'm not sure if I'd be much help.  I'm probably too beginner for gtk2/C on
the Gimp.

Eric

 --
 Andrew Gaffney
 Network Administrator
 Skyline Aeronautics, LLC.
 636-357-1548



___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Hi-Res Screen Captures

2004-05-06 Thread Eric Pierce
Exactly.  What you're after isn't possible.

Screen shots are pixelated in print.  To get your 300dpi, scale the image,
but use 'None' for interpolation type.  That'll maintain the pixely look,
but it won't be some smeared, blurry looking screenshot.  It'll be crisp.

The only way you'd get what you want is if all of Gimp's icons were vector
based (then you could scale to your hearts delight.)

Eric

 Hi...
 I think it  a conceptual error wanting 300DPI screenshots - Maybe not -
 but wait  second - the GIMP interface is designed to  be displayed at
 typical
 monitor resolutions -  from 72 to 96 dpi.

 On the other hand, a monitor will have 15'' to 17'' inhes, and your print
 out
 of a screenshot should be a few inches accross - so the 1000 pixels wide,
 15
 inch at  96 dpi screenshot would make for a 5 inch wide ate 300dpi
 screenshot
 - no matter.

 If you do intend to actually make printouts of 15'', 17'' in paper,
 nonetheless, a real world screen shot will do - the interface text may
 appear aliased or blurred in a good quality printing - but hey---that's
 how
 it looks like on the screen. :-) And on top of that,  you may still try to
 increase the quality of a screenshot scaled up to 3000 pixels using the
 Gimp
 itself, if there is the need.

 One last thing - if you actually can find a 3000 pixel screenshot, the
 interface - at least the icons - will appear proportionally small - you
 won't
 be able to achieve better icons than from a 1024x768 screenshot.

 Anyway, you may be planning something different, that I had not grasped at
 all.  But if you are after 300dpi screenshots just because the clerk at
 your printshop told you so, the way to go is to scale up a plain
 screenshot.

 regards,

   JS
   --


 On Thursday 06 May 2004 08:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Can anyone direct me to a place on the web where I can find
  150PPI or 300PPI (prefer 300PPI) GIMP screen shots from all
  the major platforms... Mac, Linux and Windows? I am putting
  together some GIMP propaganda, and need some help. Ideally, I
  need a couple from each platform to satisfy my situation.
 
 Please keep us informed when your propaganda is finished, we're
 always interested :)
 
 For a 17 screen, 300dpi is about 4000x3000, isn't it? I don't
 know of any such screenshots myself. There certainly aren't any
 on www.gimp.org. If you find any, I'd be interested in seeing
 them too.
 
 Cheers,
 Dave.
 
 --
David Neary,
Lyon, France
   E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 The key is for the brochures to look good when printed out. I'me trying
 to
 locate an app on the Windows side that outputs screens in hi-res but I
 haven't had any luck.

 Hey, what did you think of the MacGIMP ad in Mac Design Magazine?

 Thanks!

 Mitch Featherston
 ___
 Gimp-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user
 ___
 Gimp-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user



___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Environment settings big images

2004-04-22 Thread Eric Pierce
Hi ho,

I'm working with a relatively large RGB image (4368 x 3384px / 2MB file
size / status bar says 199MB on load).  Once I begin editing the image,
the memory usage quickly gets up around 600MB and up, and my system comes
to a crawl as it goes to the hard disk for memory space.

I'm wondering if my Environment settings are screwed up.
Min. number of undo lvl: 25
Max. undo memory: 50 mb
Tile Cache Size: 96 mb
Conservative Mem. usage: checked

I'm running: Windows 2000
392MB ram
1 GHz cpu

On PotatoShop (forced to used at gunpoint), there are no problems editing
this image or other large images.

Any ideas?  Thanks for reading.
Eric Pierce

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Gimp 2.0 - Congrats!

2004-03-24 Thread Eric Pierce
Well done, everyone!

It's been a pure joy following the 1.3 devel series and watching all the
new goodies  ideas pour into the Gimp.

You are all a part of something truly big and beautiful!

My sincerest appreciation,
Eric Pierce

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Porting to Windows Environment

2004-02-24 Thread Eric Pierce
 Sven Neumann wrote:
 IMO it's not very nice to ask for a timeframe for the availability of
 the installer package. By providing you this package, Jernej is doing
 you a favor on a voluntary basis. You shouldn't put him under pressure
 by asking for a time frame. That is about as bad (or maybe even worse)
 as asking the developers to set a date for the 2.0.0 release.

 I don't think that asking necessarily puts pressure on anyone.

If you're asked constantly (he is on the Gimp-win mailing list), I would
guess it may add a smidge of tension to the everyday.

 If you
 need the Win32 installer at a certain point in time, you can easily
 create it yourself.

 For a very unusual definition of easily. Building the GIMP on Win32 is
 not that easy.
Not sure if this is easy or not.  I haven't had a chance to setup the
build environment in Win, but...
http://wiki.gimp.org/gimp/HowToCompileGimp/MicrosoftWindows

Eric Pierce
Ps. Jernej went skiing!


___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Re: Dot for Dot

2004-01-27 Thread Eric Pierce
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2002/debian-user-200205/msg00394.html

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-01-27 at 1804.18 +):
 Trying to find out what the Dot for Dot menu item is for. At the moment
 it
 is a bit of a mystery. Can anyone help?

 It makes Gimp display in pixels or in real units. Maybe a visual
 example will help you. Compare dot for dot on and off for an image of
 512 * 512 pixels with DPI 72 * 144. One will look like a square, the
 other as a rectangle.

 GSR

 ___
 Gimp-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Updating text doesn't trigger

2004-01-27 Thread Eric Pierce
Hmmm...

Updating pre-existing text in an image with a text layer doesn't trigger
Gimp that any changes have occurred (ie., you can close the image and Gimp
won't throw up the 'Changes were made to 'image'.  Close anyway?' dialog -
hence you lose your changes).

I'm currently using Pre2 for Windows.  I'll check it at home on my Linux
box after work.

Can someone confirm/deny this anomoly before I file a bug report?

Eric Pierce

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] tif file w/multiple pages

2004-01-19 Thread Eric Pierce
That did the trick.  Thanks a lot.
Haven't got Pre2 up yet.  I wander if any of the error messages I
mentioned below have been addressed...

Eric Pierce

 Hi,

 Eric Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I'm having some problems with the new support for multipage tifs.

 First, I get the following errors.
 tif: Unknown field with tag 33949 (0x849d) encountered

 And these two errors repeat for the nubmer of pages in the tif.
 tif: Unknown field with tag 33950 (0x849e) encountered
 tif: Unknown field with tag 33951 (0x849f) encountered

 The tif image opens, and there is a layer for each page, but the
 height of the image is scaled 50% (but the width is fine).  I'm
 basically making my comparisons with Microsofts Imaging because
 that's the only program that I know that properly opens multipage
 tifs.

 Also, my multipage tifs are created whenever someone faxes me.  They fax
 me and I receive an e-mail with a tif attached.

 As far as I know such TIFF files created from fax messages have
 different resolutions on the X and Y axes. So if the plug-in manages
 to read in the resolutions correctly, the image should look directly
 if you disable Dot for Dot in the View menu. There's a preference
 option that makes this behaviour the default.


 Sven


___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] tif file w/multiple pages

2004-01-19 Thread Eric Pierce
Filed bug #131975 - Tiff multipage w/multiple warning msg.

Eric Pierce

 Hi,

 Eric Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I'm having some problems with the new support for multipage tifs.

 First, I get the following errors.
 tif: Unknown field with tag 33949 (0x849d) encountered

 And these two errors repeat for the nubmer of pages in the tif.
 tif: Unknown field with tag 33950 (0x849e) encountered
 tif: Unknown field with tag 33951 (0x849f) encountered

 The tif image opens, and there is a layer for each page, but the
 height of the image is scaled 50% (but the width is fine).  I'm
 basically making my comparisons with Microsofts Imaging because
 that's the only program that I know that properly opens multipage
 tifs.

 Also, my multipage tifs are created whenever someone faxes me.  They fax
 me and I receive an e-mail with a tif attached.

 As far as I know such TIFF files created from fax messages have
 different resolutions on the X and Y axes. So if the plug-in manages
 to read in the resolutions correctly, the image should look directly
 if you disable Dot for Dot in the View menu. There's a preference
 option that makes this behaviour the default.


 Sven


___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] tif file w/multiple pages

2004-01-14 Thread Eric Pierce
I'm having some problems with the new support for multipage tifs.

First, I get the following errors.
tif: Unknown field with tag 33949 (0x849d) encountered

And these two errors repeat for the nubmer of pages in the tif.
tif: Unknown field with tag 33950 (0x849e) encountered
tif: Unknown field with tag 33951 (0x849f) encountered

The tif image opens, and there is a layer for each page, but the height of
the image is scaled 50% (but the width is fine).  I'm basically making my
comparisons with Microsofts Imaging because that's the only program that I
know that properly opens multipage tifs.

Also, my multipage tifs are created whenever someone faxes me.  They fax
me and I receive an e-mail with a tif attached.

Is Andrey Kiselev on this list?  Maybe I could send him one of my tifs for
examination (since he implemented this feature in The Gimp).

Thanks for reading... I appreciate any suggestions.
Eric Pierce

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Clipping Path

2004-01-14 Thread Eric Pierce
Joao,

Clipping Paths are a new concept to me too.

First let me explain a tad...

For page layout work, at work we use (don't laugh) PageMaker.  Me and the
other guy recently learned that we could import raster images
w/transparency and actually have it display properly in PageMaker.  We
also learned that the tif must have a clipping path.  Basically, it's a
path with a special designation as a 'clipping path' and everything inside
the path will show, and everything outside the clipping path is
transparent.  There's a little rivalry at work because my colleage uses
Photoshop while I use The Gimp.  As it would be, PS could do a clipping
path, but I couldn't see that Gimp could.  In PS, you bring up the context
menu with the paths menu up and designate which path will be the 'clipping
path'.  That's it.  I don't know about the internals of the tif file, or
if it's even a recognized spec in tif.  I can throw up an image somewhere
if anyone is curious to check it out.

At work I'd like us both to drop Windows all together and go with
Scribus/Gimp, but that might not happen anytime soon.

Eric Pierce
 On Monday 29 December 2003 15:25, Eric Pierce wrote:
 I saw some mention (mailing list early 2001) of Gimp  the ability
 to set a clipping path.

 What is the current status on this?

 Has it been implemented or is it on the drawing board?

 What would such a  clipping path do?
 I mean...there are clipping paths in postscript, and GIMP selections
 have the functionalities that those have (and a  couple more)

 Just curious.
 Eric Pierce






___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] removing halftones from an image

2004-01-09 Thread Eric Pierce
I've scanned an image.

Here it is:
http://epierce.freeshell.org/web_phile_mgr/images/guy.png

I want to lost the halftones (I think that's what it's called - ie., the
dots).  I did a blur and sharpen, and that works OK.  But I thought I saw
a tutorial on this once on a smarter way to remove these.

Anyone got a quick link?

Thanks,
Eric Pierce


___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre

2004-01-09 Thread Eric Pierce
Without thinking all that hard about the details of your problem, why
don't you just compile gimp from source?  Then you'll find out what you
really need to compile/install.

Tip: use 'checkinstall' instead of 'make install'.  It'll do a 'make
install' for you and make custom RPMs of anything your installing.  Then
you can cleanly remove programs down the road and delete the bloated
directory where you compile any given program.

Just my 2 bits.
Eric

 Which freetype2 version do you have.

 I tried to make a rpm with the following command, just in case I need to
 uninstall it.

 rpm -ta gimp-2.0pre1.tar.bz2

 I get the following:

 error: Failed build dependencies:
 gimp-print-devel = 4.2.0 is needed by gimp-2.0pre1-1
 librsvg2-devel = 2.0 is needed by gimp-2.0pre1-1
 gtkhtml2-devel = 2.0.0 is needed by gimp-2.0pre1-1

 I then tried to download in install these packages and finally ended up
 with:
 Some package requested cannot be installed:
 librsvg2-2.2.3-2.i386 (due to unsatisfied freetype[= 2.0.1])
 do you agree ?

 and when installing freetype-2.1.2-2.rpm I get really into a dependency
 problem asking about 100packages to uninstall such as OpenOffice etc.

 It is not provided by MDK anymore as an rpm, just source rpm?
 How do I make an rpm from a src.rpm?

 Tom



 On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 13:49, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
 ??
 It compiled and installed flawlesly on my Mandrake 9.2 system.
 I think freetype 2 came installed by default here.

 Nonetheless, I used no RPM. Just urpmi for the dependencies, and them
 configure, make, make install.

 Regards,
  JS
  --

 On Friday 09 January 2004 18:00, Thomas Spuhler wrote:
  [Gimp-user] Gimp2.0pre
  Date: Today 18:00:03
  From: Thomas Spuhler [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (TUSONIX, Inc.)
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
  Message was signed with unknown key.
  The validity of the signature cannot be verified.
  Problem: OpenPGP plug-in was not specified.
  Use the 'Settings-Configure KMail-Security' dialog to specify the
  plug-in or ask your system administrator to do that for you.
 
 
  Has anybody been able to install it on Mandrake 9.2
  I'll get into a dependency hell when trying to make an rpm.
  The main problem is to get freetype 2 that will install w/o
  dependency problems
 
  Tom
 
 
  End of signed message



___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Crop selection missing top line

2004-01-04 Thread Eric Pierce
Under Gimp 1.3.23:
When I crop an image, the top crop line is not there.
Anyone else notice this?

Please someone validate/invalidate this so a bug report can get filed.

Eric Pierce

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Clipping Path

2003-12-29 Thread Eric Pierce
I saw some mention (mailing list early 2001) of Gimp  the ability to set
a clipping path.

What is the current status on this?

Has it been implemented or is it on the drawing board?

Just curious.
Eric Pierce


___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] ESC for cancel in full-screen mode

2003-12-10 Thread Eric Pierce
 On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 03:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 04:12:10PM -0600, Eric Pierce
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  However, would you consider removing ESC as a binding to pop you out
 of
  full-screen mode?  I think F11 is a sufficient (and common) toggle for

 Well, ESC has a very low probability of being remapped by e.g. a window
 manager. F11 is far more often mapped to some wm functionality.

 And the basic problem with your approach that I see is that ESC has the
 perfect meaning for going out of fullscreen mode. It's the thing users
 naturally try. F11 is about the last key users will try when they want
 to get out of full-screen mode.

 Dejavu perhaps, but can't help myself. F11 became a common toggle for
 fullscreen mode across browsers. But I know Marc doesn't quite accept an
 'everyone else does it' ;).
Yes, Mozilla/Netscape, Opera  IE toggle w/F11.  Any others?

 In case the fullscreen mode is to become useful for editing too (and I
 believe that is even more helpful) it shouldn't exit the mode on Esc for
 the reasons Eric described. Making it a pain for artists using GIMP
 extensively because it may be confusing to new ocasional users is not
 the thing to do.
How about this then?  If there is a menu/dialog box already open, ESC
cancels that item only.  If nothing else is open, ESC quits full-screen
mode.  Both camps are happy, right?

Eric Pierce


___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] ESC for cancel in full-screen mode

2003-12-09 Thread Eric Pierce
With Gimp 1.3.x, open up an image and hit F11.  It'll toggle  full-screen
mode.

You can also add as many extra goodies (like rulers, status bar, etc.) as
you want, or run it w/o anything except the image.  Really nice and
configurable (check preferences for default full-screen mode settings).

Eric

 Eric Pierce wrote:
 I use full-screen mode a lot... and love it.

 Excuse the ignorance, although 'full-screen mode' conjures up some
 thoughts, what exactly is it?

 --
 Until later, Geoffrey [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Building secure systems inspite of Microsoft

 ___
 Gimp-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Kerning for text tool

2003-11-20 Thread Eric Pierce
Will 'kerning' ever be implemented for the text tool?

Would it be ok to do a 'feature request' for this in bugzilla if it's not
currently being considered?

Thanks,
Eric Pierce
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: Dynamic Shortcuts - was Re: [Gimp-user] GIMP at COMDEX

2003-11-15 Thread Eric Pierce
 You are a  Gimp 'power user' and you are probably a good keyboard player,

Basically, there are people who utilize mnemonic use and there are those
who don't.  It's nothing to do with the Gimp.

 ALT-L,C,C sounds not like easy

Yeah, that does look a little rough out of context.  However, as you type
'ALT-L,C,C' you will think 'Alt-L(evels)-C(olors)-C(urves)' as you watch
the menus pop by.  After a while, mnemonic combinations becomes an
unconscious flick of the wrist as you become particularily comfortable
with them.  And there's a logic to it - a logic in how you 'locate' any
given menu item within the menu tree.  People who don't use mnemonics
remind me of people who never learned to touch type.  They get the job
done, but it's inefficient as hell.  Same goes for those who don't use
mnemonics - once your hand leaves the keyboard to grab for the mouse, you
lose your momentum.  Granted you could argue that the Gimp is mouse
intensive. And obviously there are some things you simply must use the
mouse for, but some people would be surprised just how much (and how
quickly) you can get work done in the Gimp by extreme keyboard
utilization.  (wow... that could be a new X Game..)

 Then three letters
 to memorize for each function to call it's not easy.
I wouldn't recommend using mnemonics for each function either.  I'd
keyboard shortcut as much as possible.  The few stragglers are where
mnemonics step in to save the day.  If you use keyboard shortcuts
extensively, then the rest of the menu functions you need to get to can be
handled competently by mnemonics.

Shit, did I say too much?
Oh, I forgot to mention that I have Suriphobia.
Eric Pierce
Ps.  Did someone claim mnemonics were ergonomic?  Maybe they are somehow.

 On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 19:02:17 +0100
 Jakub Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 I usually use features from the layer menu without adding shortcuts for
 them. A simple Alt+L,C,C gets me the curve tool, Alt+L,C,L the levels
 tool. There's a couple of functions I use as often. Mnemonics are a
 default so wherever I go, they work (on the same locale).

 ALT-L,C,C sounds not like easy and ergonomic to me. Don't know for you
 but for me ALT-L with only one hand is not ergonomic. Then three letters
 to memorize for each function to call it's not easy.
 And for the localisation I hope (but I am not sure ) that all the
 translator
 really check all menus and dialogs to avoid letters duplications.

 So please don't play down their usefulness. I love them.

 You are a  Gimp 'power user' and you are probably a good keyboard player,
 no doubt that you can achieve something powerful with mnemonics.
 But you probably understand that consedering the wide range of Gimp users
 and
 the world of artists it's hard for me to imagine a large usefulness.

 @+
 Raymond

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] pixelate question

2003-11-13 Thread Eric Pierce
JB,
Hmm...  that didn't seem to work.  Maybe I screwed something up.  Was that
supposed to gradually pixelate each layer more than the next?  I'm using
Gimp-win (I'm at work).  Each layer was equally pixelized the same amount.

Anyway, I'm not working on several layers.  Just one layer - a photo of
people.  I want it to gradually (from right to left) go from no pixelation
to slight pixelation, and then larger and larger pixelation so there would
be nice chunky squares on the left side.

Signed Stumped
 On Thursday 13 November 2003 1:04 pm, Eric Pierce wrote:
 I'm trying to take a photo and have it gradually pixelate from
 small boxes to big boxes.  Can't figure it out except for doing it
 manually (ugh).

 Any ideas?  Thanks for reading!
 Eric Pierce


 image-filter-filter all layers,
 apply varying , and the wizard does the rest. :-)

 I just am not certain if filter all layers is always there or needs
 GIMP-GAP to be installed.

 Regards,
   JS
   --






___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Coding for Gimp

2003-10-07 Thread Eric Pierce
Thanks both of you for the links.

Damn... I'm intimidated to say the least.  Looks like I've got some
reading ahead of me.

Ta ta,
Eric Pierce

 Eric Pierce wrote:
 Forgive my naivety, but what would be a good way to plunge into some
 Gimp
 code and maybe even help out someday?

 We need lots of people, for everything from bug fixing to plug-in
 maintenance, and core development. Plug-ins are smaller, so
 getting into those is somewhat easier than attacking the core,
 although since it's been re-structured, the core is nicely
 objectified and readable too (except for a couple of places).

 Some information on getting started is here...
 http://mmmaybe.gimp.org/develop/

 and a page I wrote for the wiki, which I hope will eventually
 make its way onto the website, is here:
 http://wiki.gimp.org/gimp/GettingStartedWithGimp

 This also contains lots of information on how non-programmer
 types can wet their feet and help out with the website, bugzilla,
 testing, documentation and general helping out  support.

 For more developer type profiles, you could look here...
 http://developer.gimp.org

 Cheers,
 Dave.

 --
David Neary,
Lyon, France
   E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ___
 Gimp-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Mneumonics fighting dynamic shortcuts on 1.3.20

2003-09-27 Thread Eric Pierce
I think I found a little problem with assigning shortcuts on 1.3.20.

Try this:
On an image window, click the View drop down menu.  Now place the cursor
over an item  -  I did Shrink Wrap.

Now I type f to assign it as a shortcut key to Shrink Wrap, but before
the shortcut saves, the Display Filters windows (which has f as a
mneumonic) comes up, and the keyboard shortcut is never assigned.

I can edit the 'menurc' file and set it there, but I'd venture a guess
that this won't work for any other similar situations (could be quite a
few).

Otherwise, 1.3.20 rocks my world.
Eric Pierce

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Coding for Gimp

2003-09-27 Thread Eric Pierce
Forgive my naivety, but what would be a good way to plunge into some Gimp
code and maybe even help out someday?

I currently do web development (PHP, JavaScript, ColdFusion) and I've
mucked a little with C/C++ and I even did some Assembler programming on
the (don't laugh) Apple ][+ years back.

Any comments, suggestions and gentle shoves in the right direction would
be much obliged.

Thanks,
Eric Pierce

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] CinePaint and Film Gimp

2003-09-15 Thread Eric Pierce
 Robin, there is really no point in being personally offended here.

 Sven, no need to apologize. I said I wasn't offended.

 Cheers,

 Robin

So the merge is on?


 ---
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Hollywood, California
 www.CinePaint.org   Free motion picture and still image editing software

 ___
 Gimp-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Drawing a Triangle

2003-09-08 Thread Eric Pierce
I've used Gfig before to make an equilateral triangle.

filters - render - gfig

Here's also a Gfig tutorial that won't help you make a triangle, but
should get you up to speed on Gfig.
http://gug.sunsite.dk/tutorials/illfated1/

Eric P.
 Hi,

 Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Which tool do I use to 'connect the dots' for triangle? I tried all
 the ones I could find to no avail...

 http://mmmaybe.gimp.org/tutorials/Straight_Line/

 If there is any good docs on basics in 1.3x that'd be cool too.

 Documentation for 1.2 generally applies to GIMP-1.3 as well.


 Sven
 ___
 Gimp-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] moving around a selection

2003-09-07 Thread Eric Pierce
 Hold down the Alt key, then move the selection frame.  Note that Alt is
 often
 bound to a different action - in Gnome, check your keybindings, in KDE -
 ditto
I use IceWM and this is also the case (alt-click moves the entire window
in IceWM).

Does anyone know a way to reassign this in IceWM?

I asked this a while ago on the IceWM list, but didn't receive a reply.

Thanks,
Eric Pierce

 (not sure of the details for KDE).

 On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Vittorio == Vittorio wrote:

   Vittorio How can I move a selection around a picture, that is (and more
   Vittorio precisely), move the frame of the selection only not its
 content
 -
 Timothy Jedlicka, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 1-630-713-4436, AOL-IM=bonzowork
 Network Entomologist, Lucent Technologies, Testers For Hire


___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Simple Radial Lines

2003-08-14 Thread Eric Pierce
 On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 21:02, Jeff Trefftzs wrote:

 1.  Select the Black  White Gradient
 2.  In the Gradient Tool Dialog select:
  2.1  Custom Gradient
  2.2  Linear (or bi-linear)
  2.3  Sawtooth or Triangular repeats
 3.  Click and drag in the image window to get as many stripes as you
 want rays.  Make sure the stripes run vertically.
 4.  Image/Filters/Distorts/Polar Coords

 Presto!  Raidal rays.

 You can also replace the gradient voodoo with renderpatterngrid. Polar
 Coord is a great trick for this though. Good tip.

yeah, that's hot.  A good way to get some control on the # of lines.

Thanks everyone who posted and especially to Joao for the cool dog script.

Eric Pierce


 cheers

 --
 Jakub Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 ___
 Gimp-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Fnord contest, etc. WAS Simple Radial Lines

2003-08-09 Thread Eric Pierce
 Not at all, Eric!

 I like my script, mostly because I can always write others to perform
 like tasks.
Where did you learn how to write ps like that?  I'd love to learn a little
bit myself.  Are there any good websites or books that you recommend?
Have you ever messed around with xml/svg scripting?  I'd like to get into
that as well.  Too bad it's not widely supported in common browsers.

 But... I am just AMAZED by the grid + polar_coord trick.
Yeah, that one works great too.  A nice internal method for pulling off
the radial lines.

 I bet we could just create a GIMP PUZZLE CONTEST .
 The most incredible, and yet feasible, way to draw
 fnord in the GIMP wins.
Hey, good idea!  (just learned what 'fnord' is or isn't?) And then each
winner's technique could be added to a cool little Fnord repository of
short little tutorials (or even script-fu).  If I can muster up some time,
we could propose something along these lines to the world.  I could
even host it on my webspace or maybe gimp.org would let us host it there.

 (And any postscript would be left out of
 such a contest - it's not made with the GIMP after all)

 Does photoshop  have got an easier way to draw these
 Simple Radial Lines ?
I don't know.  I work with a guy who uses Photoshop, and when I described
wanting to make some radial lines for an ad, he thought there might be a
way in Photoshop, but I beat him to the punch w/your script.

 I remember using Deluxe Paint, in DOS - and there,
 there was a symetric mode one could enable - every stroke was
 mirrored N times around a common center, or in tiles, and this drawing
 could be made using that.

 Actually, Deluxe Paint, for simple it was, had some features that are
 not found around in any other program.

Hmm... could be a cool plug-in for Gimp.  I wish I knew C.

Good chatting,
Eric Pierce
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] How to move selection ONLY!?!

2003-08-07 Thread Eric Pierce
What window manager are you using?

I use IceWM, and that steals the alt-click combo, so I can't use it.

Fortunately, ctrl-alt-click works.  Try that.

Eric Pierce


 GIMP user manual says:
 Note: To move a selection without making it float, you have to select
 the Move tool and press the Alt key as you drag the (empty) selection to
 another position. If you try to use the Move tool on a non-floating
 selection without pressing the Alt key, you will just move the entire
 layer or background.

 I just can't make it happen. I want to make a selection and then move it
 to the right plase WITHOUT moving it's contents or any part of image.
 Just the selection. Like in PhotoShop...

 I am using GIMP 1.2.3  1.3.17
 And besides I am a newbie! :)

 --
 Mikelis Zalais [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 ___
 Gimp-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] Simple Radial Lines

2003-08-05 Thread Eric Pierce
That's it!  Very cool solution.

As soon as you mentioned ps I started wondering if Sodipodi (or some other
vector dealy) could pull this trick off, but your code is perfect. 
Manipulable and everything is rendered automatically.

Would make for a nice plug-in I imagine.

Thanks again!
Eric Pierce
 Could not think of an easy way using the GIMP.

 Actually, the only more or less easy way I could think off is using
 a graphic turtle I am making in GIMP-Python.

 Since that would be complicated I made an extra-gimp solution for you.
 An Postscript Snippet.

 Just paste the following postscript code in a plain text file, which
 name ends in .ps , edit the number of rays to the desired one,
 and them just open it as an image in the GIMP.

 Enjoy it!

 __

 %!PS
 %%BoundingBox: 0 0 1000 1000

 %(C) by Joao S. O. Bueno - 2003
 %Free to use, change and re-distribute as you like.
 %Created for posting at gimp-user mailing list, aug-05-2003
 %Creates a radial pattern


 /numrays 8 def
 /step 360 numrays div def
 500 500 translate

 360 step div cvi
{
 newpath
 0 1000 moveto
 0 0 lineto
 step 2 div rotate
 0 1000 lineto
 closepath
 fill
 step 2 div rotate
} repeat

 showpage


 Eric Pierce wrote:
 This should be easy, but I just can't think how to do it.

 All I want to create is a radial burst.  Sharp black and white lines
 evenly spaced emanating from the center.

 Exactly like the old Japanese flag but without the circle in the middle.
 See here:
 http://www.japanorama.com/images/navy_army_ww2_flag.gif

 I've been wracking my brains for the last several hours, and digging
 through the plug-ings, but I can't come up with anything.  It seems like
 it'd be so easy...

 Any help would be much obliged!
 Eric Pierce

 ___
 Gimp-user mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user





___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Re: ps-menurc update for 1.3.16

2003-07-05 Thread Eric Pierce
Small ps-menurc update for 1.3.16:
epierce.freeshell.org/gimp/ps-menurc

Added 'Show Grid'

Also added a bit of text to the webpage:
epierce.freeshell.org/gimp/gimp_ps.php

Sven, I tried setting Zoom 1:1 to 'Ctrl-Alt-0', but it doesn't work.  Is
this a no-no since it's using 'Alt' and a potential mnemonic conflict?

Thanks,
Eric Pierce

 Hi,

 Eric Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I've finally had a moment to make up a new ps-menurc (I called it
 'ps6_menurc').  http://epierce.freeshell.org/gimp/ps-menurc It's
 based on Photoshop 6.

 And here's a page detailing which shortcuts I did.
 http://epierce.freeshell.org/gimp/gimp_ps.php

 The page isn't quite done yet, but if anyone has any criticisms,
 etc., I'd like to hear them.

 Looks great. I will include it as the default ps_menurc in GIMP-1.3.
 Thanks for your work and please inform me if you do any changes on
 this file that should go into CVS.


 Sven



___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] ps-menurc update

2003-06-21 Thread Eric Pierce
 Sven:
 Appending ps-menurc to menurc won't work (who on earth told you to try
 this?). You need to replace ~/.gimp-1.2/menurc with ps-menurc. Please
 note that the bindings are partly out-of-date. We'd appreciate a patch
 that updates the keybindings but although I keep asking for this for
 some years now, no Photoshop user has yet provided us an updated
 version of this file.

 I'd be happy to update it.  I use Gimp and Photoshop (mostly Gimp) at
 work, and have been regularily updating my keyboard shorts in the Gimp to
 resemble PS.  The only problem is we're at PS 5.0 (not the latest 7.0).
 Would that be good enough?

Eric

Sven,
I've finally had a moment to make up a new ps-menurc (I called it
'ps6_menurc').
http://epierce.freeshell.org/gimp/ps6_menurc
It's based on Photoshop 6.

And here's a page detailing which shortcuts I did.
http://epierce.freeshell.org/gimp/gimp_ps.html

The page isn't quite done yet, but if anyone has any criticisms, etc., I'd
like to hear them.

Eric Pierce

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Dragging tool bar crashes 1.3.15 in Japanese

2003-06-20 Thread Eric Pierce
Anyone else experience this?

I use a Japanese environment.  With 1.3.15, whenever I try to drag the
tool bar to dock under the main gimp window, gimp crashes.  Here's the
error.

(gimp-1.3:2598): Gdk-CRITICAL **: file gdkwindow.c: line 526
(gdk_window_get_parent): assertion `GDK_IS_WINDOW (window)' failed

This doesn't happen when I run 1.3.15 in English.  It works fine. 
Anything to do w/2-byte vs. 1-byte fonts?

Thanks and looking good elsewise,
Eric Pierce
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] problem w/assigning keys in 1.3.13

2003-06-10 Thread Eric Pierce
 Hi,

 Eric Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I can't assign the following Alt-key shortcuts to menu items in 1.3.13.

 Alt-s
 Alt-i
 Alt-d
 Alt-v
 Alt-e
 Alt-r
 Alt-f
 Alt-t
 Alt-l

 You better not use Alt for shortcuts since the Alt key is used for
 mnemonics.


 Sven

Mnemonics?
What'chu talkin' about, Willis?

Eric

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


Re: [Gimp-user] problem w/assigning keys in 1.3.13

2003-06-10 Thread Eric Pierce
 Hi,

 Eric Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 You better not use Alt for shortcuts since the Alt key is used for
 mnemonics.

 Mnemonics?
 What'chu talkin' about, Willis?

 Mnemonics is how GTK+ calls keyboard accelerators for widgets which
 are indicated by an underlined character. We are making heavy use of
 them in latest versions of The GIMP.


 Sven
I see.  That thought actually passed through my little brain, but I wasn't
sure.  Thanks for explaining that.

I hope you didn't take offense about the 'Willis' bit.  That's from a dumb
US TV show from the 70s (Family Ties).

Haven't compiled 1.3.15 yet, but everything is looking unbelievably
awesome so far.  Hope you pump out another O'Reilly book when you reach
1.4!

Much gratitude,
Eric Pierce

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] problem w/assigning keys in 1.3.13

2003-06-07 Thread Eric Pierce
I can't assign the following Alt-key shortcuts to menu items in 1.3.13.

Alt-s
Alt-i
Alt-d
Alt-v
Alt-e
Alt-r
Alt-f
Alt-t
Alt-l

The other letters work fine.  Did I screw up something w/gtk?  Or is it Gimp?

Hmm and they worked up through 1.3.12.

Thanks for reading.
Eric Pierce

___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] ImageMap can't read file it created

2003-04-23 Thread Eric Pierce
Hi all,

I'm having a problem with ImageMap.

I can create a nice image map, save it and away I go.  It renders lovely
HTML, etc.
However, I'm having problems reloading the generated HTML file.
I get the error Couldn't read file: filename

I've tried making REALLY simple imagemaps to test my sanity, but they
won't reload either.

(I am using Gimp for Windows if that matters.)
Any ideas?  Maybe I'm just saving it wrong or something...

Thanks for reading...
Eric Pierce



___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


[Gimp-user] Stripping an image from solid background

2002-12-24 Thread Eric Pierce
I've wondered for years if there's any way to
perfectly strip an image from a solid colored
background while maintaining any alpha channel info.

Take this image for instance.
http://epierce.freeshell.org/temp/index.html

The background is 100% white.  But there's some
definate blending going on with the image border and
with the image shadow.

I played a bit with a layer of white using the
different layer modes thinking one of them might
cancel out the white effectively stripping out only
the white, but to no avail.

Anyway, this isn't pressing... just picking at my
brain for some time.

Thanks for any ideas!
Eric P.



__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user



[Gimp-user] Re: Advice with gimp 1.3

2002-12-24 Thread Eric Pierce
Carol,

I'm running 1.3.10.  Can I ask you how you
accomplished this[1] in 1.3.x?
http://sven.gimp.org/toolbox-mockup.png

Thanks!
Eric P.

1. The docking and putting the color selector in the
main window



__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
___
Gimp-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user