[Zen] Nice Quote

2013-06-07 Thread Bill!
Deluded, a Buddha is a sentient being;
Awakened, a sentient being is a Buddha.

Ignorant, a Buddha is a sentient being;
With wisdom, a sentient being is a Buddha.

If the mind is warped, a Buddha is a sentient being;
If the mind is impartial, a sentient being is a Buddha.

When once a warped mind is produced,
Buddha is concealed within the sentient being.

If for one instant of thought we become impartial,
Then sentient beings are themselves Buddha.

In our mind itself a Buddha exists,
Our own Buddha is the true Buddha.

If we do not have in ourselves the Buddha mind,
Then where are we to seek the Buddha?

- The Sutra of Hui Neng





Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-27 Thread Bill!
 is 'forms'.
 
  Edgar believes forms (structure, rationality) exists independently
  of
us
  and we perceive it with our intellect. I believe we create the
structures
  and superimpose it upon our experiences to create our perceptions.
 
  The bottom line is I claim all thoughts are illusory and Edgar
  claims
they
  are part of reality.
 
  We have other disagreements but I still think most of them are
semantic,
  but in some cases they do indeed to be fundamental.
 
  Other than that all is well...Bill!
 
  --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:
  
   Yeeaaay, Edgar and Bill are in total agreement, finally!
  
   :-)
   Siska
   -Original Message-
   From: Edgar Owen edgarowen@
   Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
   Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 07:55:25
   To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
   Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
   Subject: Re: [Zen] Nice Quote
  
   Bill,
  
   Total agreement as stated.
  
   Just incorporate what I said yesterday that these forms exist in
reality
  instead of in your nutty head and you'll have the whole meaning..
  
   Edgar
  
  
  
   On May 25, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Bill! wrote:
  
   
Siska,
   
As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar
  opposite
  opinion on just about everything. In fact he'll probably disagree
  with
this
  statement ;) and will certainly jump all over the rest of this
  post.
   
Rumi's poem/metaphor was:
   
I looked for my self,
But my self was gone.
The boundaries of my being
Had disappeared in the sea.
Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
And a voice returned me to myself.
It always happens like this.
Sea turns on itself and foams,
And with every foaming bit another body.
Another being takes form.
And when the sea sends word,
Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
- Rumi
   
I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the
  waves
form,
  come rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend
  themselves by
  slipping back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha Nature and
  later
  composing this poem. My interpretation of it is:
   
I looked for my self,
But my self was gone.
The boundaries of my being
Had disappeared in the sea.
   
Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature.
  The
  illusion of dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as
something
  independent and apart from everything else has vanished with it.
  It has
  vanished into sea which is a metaphor for emptiness.
   
Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
And a voice returned me to myself.
It always happens like this.
   
Dualism returns. His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has
  been
  interrupted and his illusion of self has returned. This alternation
between
  holism and dualism, between emptiness and self happens regularly,
  much
like
  the waves surging rhythmically upon the beach.
   
Sea turns on itself and foams,
And with every foaming bit another body.
Another being takes form.
   
Now that he is abiding in dualism all other illusions,
  perceptions,
  thoughts, etc..., of all other (10,000) things appear.
   
And when the sea sends word,
Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
   
But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions
  melt
  back into emptiness.
   
That's my reading of this anyway. It will be interesting to see
what
  Edgar comes up with although I think I could almost write it for
  him...
   
...Bill!
   
--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:

 Hi Bill,

 I followed until: Waves broke.

 The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.

 Siska
 -Original Message-
 From: Bill! BillSmart@
 Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29
 To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote


 ..Bill!

   
   
  
 
 
 
 
 

   
   
   
   

   
Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or
  are
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links
   
   
   
   
  
 
 
 
  
 
  Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are
  reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo

Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-27 Thread Edgar Owen
Bill,

I agree the effectiveness of a Bodhisattva is also important. And I certainly 
wish I were more effective in the way I present the truth of Zen.

However when minds are closed to the truth there are limits to what a 
Bodhisattva can teach. So from that perspective it's always better just to cut 
through to the bare truth whether it falls on an open mind or not.

The problem with coddling emotionally needy feelings and delusions is that it 
tends to reinforce them.

On the other hand just telling the bare truth like I do tends to elicit all 
sorts of defensive ego mechanisms.

So what's a Bodhisattva to do? 

In my case just give up and go back to writing my book I guess.
:-)

Edgar



On May 26, 2013, at 9:18 PM, Joe wrote:

 Bill!, Chris,
 
 A bodhisattva might still take on the conventionalization of a your, or a 
 my, just so as not to weird you out, and to be of help or service. This too 
 is called Compassion.
 
 It's not impossible to do this, even in the awakened state. Mind you, it may 
 not be easy, but it's not impossible. Not once you see, after a while, what's 
 at stake, and feel one's true responsibility to be not only honest, but 
 effective. This is the depth and sincerity of the life and career of a 
 bodhisattva. You've got to walk all sides of the street, not just two sides, 
 ...or One! Especially NOT one!
 
 Dualism bites. But not if you're un-bitten. Then you can use it for the sake 
 of all beings. And you had better: it's one of the best tools in our 
 medical bag.
 
 But don't try this at Home, unless you've been to the trenches, please. Go to 
 the trenches, NOW.
 
 --Joe
 
  Bill! BillSmart@... wrote:
 
  Chris,
  
  I know this was a reply to Edgar's post below, but I wasn't sure if it was 
  in support or qualifying his post.
  
  I agree with you that the 'your' part of 'your mind' is the critical 
  qualifier that signals illusion. This is because it signals dualism.
  
  So yes, I do claim forms arise in the duality created by 'your mind'. If 
  'your mind' does not exist then duality does not exist; then there is only 
  the One Mind, the Original Mind - Buddha Nature.
 
 



Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-27 Thread Edgar Owen
Wrong...

Edgar



On May 26, 2013, at 9:33 PM, Bill! wrote:

 Edgar,
 
 You don't 'solve' koans, if by 'solving' you mean 'put them into a nice, 
 clean, rational perspective'. Like Merle said several posts ago, 'Zen is not 
 about grasping'.
 
 You don't 'grasp' or 'solve' or 'understand' koans or Buddha Nature or zen. 
 You experience them. You live them.
 
 ...Bill! 
 
 --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen edgarowen@... wrote:
 
  Bill,
  
  That's the Zen for Dummies approach. 
  
  The superior approach is to actually SOLVE the koan. When you truly 
  understand it realization appears!
  
  Edgar
  
  
  
  On May 26, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Bill! wrote:
  
   Edgar,
   
   Giving up is good. That's what many zen teaching techniques are designed 
   to do, and in particular koans. They are intended to drive you to the 
   point where you give up on your attempts to find an intellectual 
   (rational) answer or response to the koan. It's then when the intellect 
   quiesces that you may experience Buddha Nature.
   
   ...Bill!
   
   --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen edgarowen@ wrote:
   
No, you still don't get the obvious.

I give up!

Edgar



On May 26, 2013, at 8:47 AM, Bill! wrote:

 Edgar,
 
 Forms are dualistic. They only arise when your intellect creates 
 dualism. That is the only place where they can 'exist', but they 
 'exist' there as illusions - like a dream.
 
 ...Bill!
 
 --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen edgarowen@ wrote:
 
  Bill,
  
  NO!
  
  You claim that the forms arise in YOUR mind.
  
  But YOUR mind IS A FORM. Is one of the forms that arises.
  
  I've told you a hundred times that forms CANNOT arise in what does 
  not exist!
  
  Forms arise - and only then are they categorized into the duality 
  of mind and not mind.
  
  So you cannot say that forms arise in your mind because your mind 
  does not yet exist when the forms arise.
  
  Therefore forms arise as experience - but NOT the experience of any 
  mind.
  
  Therefor what exists and manifests cannot be said to either arise 
  in mind OR external world, since these are both forms that arise.
  
  So the true and proper view is that pure experience is the 
  fundamental reality, but this is just pure experience prior to the 
  dualism of experiencer and experienced.
  
  Therefore your claim that forms arise in YOUR mind is dead wrong...
  
  At the most fundamental level forms just arise.
  
  What do they arise within? They arise within Buddha Nature for that 
  is all that is possible for anything to arise within.
  
  Therefore the forms, as manifestations of Buddha Nature, are 
  reality, because reality is the totality of all that exists.
  
  
  Hopefully this will get through to you someday. It's so clear and 
  obvious.
  
  There are a couple of additional subtleties beyond this but I won't 
  confuse you with them right now.
  
  Edgar
  
  
  
  On May 26, 2013, at 5:28 AM, Bill! wrote:
  
   Siska,
   
   No, unfortunately not.
   
   Edgar does this all the time. He says something that seems to 
   agree with what I've stated but then slips in one word that 
   corrupts what I have stated. In this case the word is 'forms'.
   
   Edgar believes forms (structure, rationality) exists 
   independently of us and we perceive it with our intellect. I 
   believe we create the structures and superimpose it upon our 
   experiences to create our perceptions.
   
   The bottom line is I claim all thoughts are illusory and Edgar 
   claims they are part of reality.
   
   We have other disagreements but I still think most of them are 
   semantic, but in some cases they do indeed to be fundamental.
   
   Other than that all is well...Bill! 
   
   --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:
   
Yeeaaay, Edgar and Bill are in total agreement, finally!

:-)
Siska
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Owen edgarowen@
Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 07:55:25 
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

Bill,

Total agreement as stated.

Just incorporate what I said yesterday that these forms exist 
in reality instead of in your nutty head and you'll have the 
whole meaning..

Edgar



On May 25, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Bill! wrote:

 
 Siska,
 
 As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar

Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-27 Thread Joe
Edgar,

quoting:
However when minds are closed to the truth

Talk about a dueling-dualist, out for a duel! (note: this is not Zen, but not 
everything has to be).

Try coddling.  It's a good Yoga.

The world will turn around, and you will see it aright.

Just a suggestion of a Method.

In Vipassana, it is called the Practice of Metta.

In Zen practice, there is no explicit Metta practice that is traditional; 
instead the whole program of Zen work is devoted to the aim of opening and 
freeing the heart of (true) Compassion.

There is no other purpose of (traditional; authentic; orthodox; Tathagatha- ; 
or Patriarchal-Zen) practice.

Shakyamuni started this ball rolling or wheel turning when he got up from his 
seat after seeing Venus that morning, and this same heart has been transmitted 
down 87 generations.  I am the 87th generation (you may be older, say the 86th 
gen.).

One American Zen master in S. Suzuki's line (S. Francisco) is working on 
including Metta practice in Zen training explicitly, intentionally.  We'll see 
how it goes.  He's written and published some things about it: he is Norm 
Zoketsu Fischer, Roshi; in the Bay Area (USA).  Granted, it's not traditional, 
but innovations may yet be possible that have escaped inclusion during the past 
1500 years.  As we know, everything depends on and lives according to causes 
and conditions.

It's not for us to present the truth of Zen: it is for us -- real Bodhisattvas 
-- to function in accord with Wisdom and Compassion.  If that is the truth, 
then so be it.  The best and only true presentation is Compassion.  Just as it 
arises.  You may quote me in your book.  Email me and I'll send correct 
spelling of my full name.  Thanks, and best,

--Joe

 Edgar Owen edgarowen@... wrote:

 Bill,
 
 I agree the effectiveness of a Bodhisattva is also important. And I certainly 
 wish I were more effective in the way I present the truth of Zen.
 
 However when minds are closed to the truth there are limits to what a 
 Bodhisattva can teach. So from that perspective it's always better just to 
 cut through to the bare truth whether it falls on an open mind or not.
 
 The problem with coddling emotionally needy feelings and delusions is that it 
 tends to reinforce them.
 
 On the other hand just telling the bare truth like I do tends to elicit all 
 sorts of defensive ego mechanisms.
 
 So what's a Bodhisattva to do? 
 
 In my case just give up and go back to writing my book I guess.
 :-)






Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-26 Thread Bill!
 the sea sends word,
  Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
  - Rumi
 
  I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves
  form, come rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend themselves
  by slipping back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha Nature and later
  composing this poem. My interpretation of it is:
 
  I looked for my self,
  But my self was gone.
  The boundaries of my being
  Had disappeared in the sea.
 
  Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature. The
  illusion of dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as something
  independent and apart from everything else has vanished with it. It has
  vanished into sea which is a metaphor for emptiness.
 
  Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
  And a voice returned me to myself.
  It always happens like this.
 
  Dualism returns. His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has
  been interrupted and his illusion of self has returned. This alternation
  between holism and dualism, between emptiness and self happens regularly,
  much like the waves surging rhythmically upon the beach.
 
  Sea turns on itself and foams,
  And with every foaming bit another body.
  Another being takes form.
 
  Now that he is abiding in dualism all other illusions,
  perceptions, thoughts, etc..., of all other (10,000) things appear.
 
  And when the sea sends word,
  Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
 
  But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions
  melt back into emptiness.
 
  That's my reading of this anyway. It will be interesting to see
  what Edgar comes up with although I think I could almost write it for 
  him...
 
  ...Bill!
 
  --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:
  
   Hi Bill,
  
   I followed until: Waves broke.
  
   The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.
  
   Siska
   -Original Message-
   From: Bill! BillSmart@
   Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
   Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29
   To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
   Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
   Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote
  
  
   ..Bill!
  
 
 

   
   
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
  Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are
  reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 






Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-26 Thread Bill!
:
  
Edgar,
   
As long as you agree dualism is an illusion you can call it 'reality' 
if you wish. I don't agree, but we can let others decide for 
themselves if illusions are real or not.
   
...Bill!
   
--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen edgarowen@ wrote:

 Bill,

 Total agreement as stated.

 Just incorporate what I said yesterday that these forms exist in 
 reality instead of in your nutty head and you'll have the whole 
 meaning..

 Edgar



 On May 25, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Bill! wrote:

 
  Siska,
 
  As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar 
  opposite opinion on just about everything. In fact he'll probably 
  disagree with this statement ;) and will certainly jump all over 
  the rest of this post.
 
  Rumi's poem/metaphor was:
 
  I looked for my self,
  But my self was gone.
  The boundaries of my being
  Had disappeared in the sea.
  Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
  And a voice returned me to myself.
  It always happens like this.
  Sea turns on itself and foams,
  And with every foaming bit another body.
  Another being takes form.
  And when the sea sends word,
  Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
  - Rumi
 
  I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves 
  form, come rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend 
  themselves by slipping back into the sea - losing himself in 
  Buddha Nature and later composing this poem. My interpretation of 
  it is:
 
  I looked for my self,
  But my self was gone.
  The boundaries of my being
  Had disappeared in the sea.
 
  Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature. The 
  illusion of dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as 
  something independent and apart from everything else has vanished 
  with it. It has vanished into sea which is a metaphor for 
  emptiness.
 
  Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
  And a voice returned me to myself.
  It always happens like this.
 
  Dualism returns. His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has 
  been interrupted and his illusion of self has returned. This 
  alternation between holism and dualism, between emptiness and 
  self happens regularly, much like the waves surging rhythmically 
  upon the beach.
 
  Sea turns on itself and foams,
  And with every foaming bit another body.
  Another being takes form.
 
  Now that he is abiding in dualism all other illusions, 
  perceptions, thoughts, etc..., of all other (10,000) things 
  appear.
 
  And when the sea sends word,
  Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
 
  But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions 
  melt back into emptiness.
 
  That's my reading of this anyway. It will be interesting to see 
  what Edgar comes up with although I think I could almost write it 
  for him...
 
  ...Bill!
 
  --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:
  
   Hi Bill,
  
   I followed until: Waves broke.
  
   The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.
  
   Siska
   -Original Message-
   From: Bill! BillSmart@
   Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
   Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29
   To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
   Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
   Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote
  
  
   ..Bill!
  
 
 

   
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
  reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 







Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-26 Thread siska_cen
Hi Bill,

 As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar opposite opinion on 
 just about everything. 

Yes, it amazes me sometimes that you two are, in fact, co-moderators of this 
forum :-P

Your interpretation below was how I understood the poem too. But because I 
thought it was supposed to be all about Buddha Nature, the part after waves 
broke didn't make sense to me. It's not Buddha Nature...

I guess I had pre-conceived ideas about Rumi's poems ;-)


Siska
-Original Message-
From: Bill! billsm...@hhs1963.org
Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 07:41:22 
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

Siska,
As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar opposite
opinion on just about everything.  In fact he'll probably disagree with
this statement ;) and will certainly jump all over the rest of this
post.
Rumi's poem/metaphor was:
I looked for my self,But my self was gone.The boundaries of my beingHad
disappeared in the sea.Waves broke.  Awareness rose again.And a voice
returned me to myself.It always happens like this.Sea turns on itself
and foams,And with every foaming bit another body.Another being takes
form.And when the sea sends word,Each foaming body melts back to
ocean-breath.- Rumi
I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves form,
come rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend themselves by
slipping back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha Nature and later
composing this poem.  My interpretation of it is:
I looked for my self,But my self was gone.The boundaries of my beingHad
disappeared in the sea.
Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature.  The
illusion of dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as something
independent and apart from everything else has vanished with it.  It has
vanished into sea which is a metaphor for emptiness.
Waves broke.  Awareness rose again.And a voice returned me to myself.It
always happens like this.
Dualism returns.  His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has been
interrupted and his illusion of self has returned.  This alternation
between holism and dualism, between emptiness and self happens
regularly, much like the waves surging rhythmically upon the beach.
Sea turns on itself and foams,And with every foaming bit another
body.Another being takes form.
Now that he is abiding in dualism all other illusions, perceptions,
thoughts, etc..., of all other (10,000) things appear.
And when the sea sends word,Each foaming body melts back to
ocean-breath.
But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions melt back
into emptiness.
That's my reading of this anyway.  It will be interesting to see what
Edgar comes up with although I think I could almost write it for him...
...Bill!
--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@... wrote:

 Hi Bill,

 I followed until: Waves broke.

 The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.

 Siska
 -Original Message-
 From: Bill! BillSmart@...
 Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29
 To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote


 ..Bill!





Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-26 Thread siska_cen
Bill,

Anything that is still (or look still), like a clear blue sky or a mountain 
usually does the job for me. 

Siska
-Original Message-
From: Bill! billsm...@hhs1963.org
Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 08:22:55 
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

Siska,

Yes - waves, cloud formations, staring into a fire - anything chaotic, that is 
not rational.  It allows your mind to disengage from trying to 'make sense' out 
of the changing forms and can enable you to slip into the experience of Buddha 
Nature.

This is the very same technique as koans.

...Bill!

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Merle Lester merlewiitpom@... wrote:

 
 
  yes i have often watch the waves... great poem.,...cloud formations are 
 another wonder...merle
 
 
   
 Siska,
 
 As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar opposite opinion on 
 just about everything.  In fact he'll probably disagree with this statement 
 ;) and will certainly jump all over the rest of this post.
 
 Rumi's poem/metaphor was:
 
 I looked for my self,
 But my self was gone.
 The boundaries of my being
 Had disappeared in the sea.
 Waves broke.  Awareness rose again.
 And a voice returned me to myself.
 It always happens like this.
 Sea turns on itself and foams,
 And with every foaming bit another body.
 Another being takes form.
 And when the sea sends word,
 Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
 - Rumi
 
 I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves form, come 
 rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend themselves by slipping 
 back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha Nature and later composing this 
 poem.  My interpretation of it is:
 
 I looked for my self,
 But my self was gone.
 The boundaries of my being
 Had disappeared in the sea.
 
 Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature.  The illusion 
 of dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as something independent 
 and apart from everything else has vanished with it.  It has vanished into 
 sea which is a metaphor for emptiness.
 
 Waves broke.  Awareness rose again.
 And a voice returned me to myself.
 It always happens like this.
 
 Dualism returns.  His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has been 
 interrupted and his illusion of self has returned.  This alternation between 
 holism and dualism, between emptiness and self happens regularly, much like 
 the waves surging rhythmically upon the beach. 
 
 Sea turns on itself and foams,
 And with every foaming bit another body.
 Another being takes form.
 
 Now that he is abiding in dualism all otherillusions, perceptions, thoughts, 
 etc..., of all other (10,000) things appear.
 
 And when the sea sends word,
 Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
 
 But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions melt back into 
 emptiness.
 
 That's my reading of this anyway.  It will be interesting to see what Edgar 
 comes up with although I think I could almost write it for him...
 
 ...Bill!
 --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:
 
  Hi Bill,
  
  I followed until: Waves broke.
  
  The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.
  
  Siska
  -Original Message-
  From: Bill! BillSmart@
  Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29 
  To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote
  
  
  ..Bill!
 






Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-26 Thread Bill!
Siska,

Rumi is just describing what happens to all of us - phasing in and out of 
awareness of Buddha Nature.

...Bill!

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@... wrote:

 Hi Bill,
 
  As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar opposite opinion 
  on just about everything. 
 
 Yes, it amazes me sometimes that you two are, in fact, co-moderators of this 
 forum :-P
 
 Your interpretation below was how I understood the poem too. But because I 
 thought it was supposed to be all about Buddha Nature, the part after waves 
 broke didn't make sense to me. It's not Buddha Nature...
 
 I guess I had pre-conceived ideas about Rumi's poems ;-)
 
 
 Siska
 -Original Message-
 From: Bill! BillSmart@...
 Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 07:41:22 
 To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [Zen] Nice Quote
 
 Siska,
 As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar opposite
 opinion on just about everything.  In fact he'll probably disagree with
 this statement ;) and will certainly jump all over the rest of this
 post.
 Rumi's poem/metaphor was:
 I looked for my self,But my self was gone.The boundaries of my beingHad
 disappeared in the sea.Waves broke.  Awareness rose again.And a voice
 returned me to myself.It always happens like this.Sea turns on itself
 and foams,And with every foaming bit another body.Another being takes
 form.And when the sea sends word,Each foaming body melts back to
 ocean-breath.- Rumi
 I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves form,
 come rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend themselves by
 slipping back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha Nature and later
 composing this poem.  My interpretation of it is:
 I looked for my self,But my self was gone.The boundaries of my beingHad
 disappeared in the sea.
 Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature.  The
 illusion of dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as something
 independent and apart from everything else has vanished with it.  It has
 vanished into sea which is a metaphor for emptiness.
 Waves broke.  Awareness rose again.And a voice returned me to myself.It
 always happens like this.
 Dualism returns.  His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has been
 interrupted and his illusion of self has returned.  This alternation
 between holism and dualism, between emptiness and self happens
 regularly, much like the waves surging rhythmically upon the beach.
 Sea turns on itself and foams,And with every foaming bit another
 body.Another being takes form.
 Now that he is abiding in dualism all other illusions, perceptions,
 thoughts, etc..., of all other (10,000) things appear.
 And when the sea sends word,Each foaming body melts back to
 ocean-breath.
 But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions melt back
 into emptiness.
 That's my reading of this anyway.  It will be interesting to see what
 Edgar comes up with although I think I could almost write it for him...
 ...Bill!
 --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:
 
  Hi Bill,
 
  I followed until: Waves broke.
 
  The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.
 
  Siska
  -Original Message-
  From: Bill! BillSmart@
  Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29
  To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote
 
 
  ..Bill!
 







Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-26 Thread siska_cen
Yeeaaay, Edgar and Bill are in total agreement, finally!

:-)
Siska
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Owen edgaro...@att.net
Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 07:55:25 
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

Bill,

Total agreement as stated.

Just incorporate what I said yesterday that these forms exist in reality 
instead of in your nutty head and you'll have the whole meaning..

Edgar



On May 25, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Bill! wrote:

 
 Siska,
 
 As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar opposite opinion on 
 just about everything.  In fact he'll probably disagree with this statement 
 ;) and will certainly jump all over the rest of this post.
 
 Rumi's poem/metaphor was:
 
 I looked for my self,
 But my self was gone.
 The boundaries of my being
 Had disappeared in the sea.
 Waves broke.  Awareness rose again.
 And a voice returned me to myself.
 It always happens like this.
 Sea turns on itself and foams,
 And with every foaming bit another body.
 Another being takes form.
 And when the sea sends word,
 Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
 - Rumi
 
 I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves form, come 
 rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend themselves by slipping 
 back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha Nature and later composing this 
 poem.  My interpretation of it is:
 
 I looked for my self,
 But my self was gone.
 The boundaries of my being
 Had disappeared in the sea.
 
 Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature.  The illusion of 
 dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as something independent and 
 apart from everything else has vanished with it.  It has vanished into sea 
 which is a metaphor for emptiness.
 
 Waves broke.  Awareness rose again.
 And a voice returned me to myself.
 It always happens like this.
 
 Dualism returns.  His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has been 
 interrupted and his illusion of self has returned.  This alternation between 
 holism and dualism, between emptiness and self happens regularly, much like 
 the waves surging rhythmically upon the beach. 
 
 Sea turns on itself and foams,
 And with every foaming bit another body.
 Another being takes form.
 
 Now that he is abiding in dualism all other illusions, perceptions, thoughts, 
 etc..., of all other (10,000) things appear.
 
 And when the sea sends word,
 Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
 
 But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions melt back into 
 emptiness.
 
 That's my reading of this anyway.  It will be interesting to see what Edgar 
 comes up with although I think I could almost write it for him...
 
 ...Bill!
 
 --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@... wrote:
 
  Hi Bill,
  
  I followed until: Waves broke.
  
  The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.
  
  Siska
  -Original Message-
  From: Bill! BillSmart@...
  Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29 
  To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote
  
  
  ..Bill!
 
 
 




Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-26 Thread siska_cen
Hi Bill,

Yes, it was my perception that he always talk about Buddha Nature and that 
only

My error,

Siska
-Original Message-
From: Bill! billsm...@hhs1963.org
Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 08:35:41 
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

Siska,

Rumi is just describing what happens to all of us - phasing in and out of 
awareness of Buddha Nature.

...Bill!

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@... wrote:

 Hi Bill,
 
  As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar opposite opinion 
  on just about everything. 
 
 Yes, it amazes me sometimes that you two are, in fact, co-moderators of this 
 forum :-P
 
 Your interpretation below was how I understood the poem too. But because I 
 thought it was supposed to be all about Buddha Nature, the part after waves 
 broke didn't make sense to me. It's not Buddha Nature...
 
 I guess I had pre-conceived ideas about Rumi's poems ;-)
 
 
 Siska
 -Original Message-
 From: Bill! BillSmart@...
 Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 07:41:22 
 To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [Zen] Nice Quote
 
 Siska,
 As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar opposite
 opinion on just about everything.  In fact he'll probably disagree with
 this statement ;) and will certainly jump all over the rest of this
 post.
 Rumi's poem/metaphor was:
 I looked for my self,But my self was gone.The boundaries of my beingHad
 disappeared in the sea.Waves broke.  Awareness rose again.And a voice
 returned me to myself.It always happens like this.Sea turns on itself
 and foams,And with every foaming bit another body.Another being takes
 form.And when the sea sends word,Each foaming body melts back to
 ocean-breath.- Rumi
 I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves form,
 come rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend themselves by
 slipping back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha Nature and later
 composing this poem.  My interpretation of it is:
 I looked for my self,But my self was gone.The boundaries of my beingHad
 disappeared in the sea.
 Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature.  The
 illusion of dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as something
 independent and apart from everything else has vanished with it.  It has
 vanished into sea which is a metaphor for emptiness.
 Waves broke.  Awareness rose again.And a voice returned me to myself.It
 always happens like this.
 Dualism returns.  His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has been
 interrupted and his illusion of self has returned.  This alternation
 between holism and dualism, between emptiness and self happens
 regularly, much like the waves surging rhythmically upon the beach.
 Sea turns on itself and foams,And with every foaming bit another
 body.Another being takes form.
 Now that he is abiding in dualism all other illusions, perceptions,
 thoughts, etc..., of all other (10,000) things appear.
 And when the sea sends word,Each foaming body melts back to
 ocean-breath.
 But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions melt back
 into emptiness.
 That's my reading of this anyway.  It will be interesting to see what
 Edgar comes up with although I think I could almost write it for him...
 ...Bill!
 --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:
 
  Hi Bill,
 
  I followed until: Waves broke.
 
  The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.
 
  Siska
  -Original Message-
  From: Bill! BillSmart@
  Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29
  To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote
 
 
  ..Bill!
 






Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-26 Thread Bill!
Siska,

No, unfortunately not.

Edgar does this all the time.  He says something that seems to agree with what 
I've stated but then slips in one word that corrupts what I have stated.  In 
this case the word is 'forms'.

Edgar believes forms (structure, rationality) exists independently of us and we 
perceive it with our intellect.  I believe we create the structures and 
superimpose it upon our experiences to create our perceptions.

The bottom line is I claim all thoughts are illusory and Edgar claims they are 
part of reality.

We have other disagreements but I still think most of them are semantic, but in 
some cases they do indeed to be fundamental.

Other than that all is well...Bill! 

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@... wrote:

 Yeeaaay, Edgar and Bill are in total agreement, finally!
 
 :-)
 Siska
 -Original Message-
 From: Edgar Owen edgarowen@...
 Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 07:55:25 
 To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [Zen] Nice Quote
 
 Bill,
 
 Total agreement as stated.
 
 Just incorporate what I said yesterday that these forms exist in reality 
 instead of in your nutty head and you'll have the whole meaning..
 
 Edgar
 
 
 
 On May 25, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Bill! wrote:
 
  
  Siska,
  
  As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar opposite opinion 
  on just about everything.  In fact he'll probably disagree with this 
  statement ;) and will certainly jump all over the rest of this post.
  
  Rumi's poem/metaphor was:
  
  I looked for my self,
  But my self was gone.
  The boundaries of my being
  Had disappeared in the sea.
  Waves broke.  Awareness rose again.
  And a voice returned me to myself.
  It always happens like this.
  Sea turns on itself and foams,
  And with every foaming bit another body.
  Another being takes form.
  And when the sea sends word,
  Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
  - Rumi
  
  I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves form, come 
  rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend themselves by slipping 
  back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha Nature and later composing 
  this poem.  My interpretation of it is:
  
  I looked for my self,
  But my self was gone.
  The boundaries of my being
  Had disappeared in the sea.
  
  Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature.  The illusion 
  of dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as something independent 
  and apart from everything else has vanished with it.  It has vanished into 
  sea which is a metaphor for emptiness.
  
  Waves broke.  Awareness rose again.
  And a voice returned me to myself.
  It always happens like this.
  
  Dualism returns.  His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has been 
  interrupted and his illusion of self has returned.  This alternation 
  between holism and dualism, between emptiness and self happens regularly, 
  much like the waves surging rhythmically upon the beach. 
  
  Sea turns on itself and foams,
  And with every foaming bit another body.
  Another being takes form.
  
  Now that he is abiding in dualism all other illusions, perceptions, 
  thoughts, etc..., of all other (10,000) things appear.
  
  And when the sea sends word,
  Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
  
  But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions melt back 
  into emptiness.
  
  That's my reading of this anyway.  It will be interesting to see what Edgar 
  comes up with although I think I could almost write it for him...
  
  ...Bill!
  
  --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:
  
   Hi Bill,
   
   I followed until: Waves broke.
   
   The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.
   
   Siska
   -Original Message-
   From: Bill! BillSmart@
   Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
   Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29 
   To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
   Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
   Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote
   
   
   ..Bill!
  
  
 







Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-26 Thread siska_cen
Hi Bill,

 The bottom line is I claim all thoughts are illusory and Edgar claims they 
 are part of reality.

If I understand correctly, you said, all thoughts are illusory because 
'thoughts' to you is how we perceive the reality. And all is illusory because 
we are still trapped in duality. 

Also, if I understand correctly, Edgar said, whatever is in our head, that is 
what it is. Whether or not they are illusory, they are what they are, the 
reality.

I think the two of you are not talking about exactly the same thing

Siska
-Original Message-
From: Bill! billsm...@hhs1963.org
Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 09:28:32 
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

Siska,

No, unfortunately not.

Edgar does this all the time.  He says something that seems to agree with what 
I've stated but then slips in one word that corrupts what I have stated.  In 
this case the word is 'forms'.

Edgar believes forms (structure, rationality) exists independently of us and we 
perceive it with our intellect.  I believe we create the structures and 
superimpose it upon our experiences to create our perceptions.

The bottom line is I claim all thoughts are illusory and Edgar claims they are 
part of reality.

We have other disagreements but I still think most of them are semantic, but in 
some cases they do indeed to be fundamental.

Other than that all is well...Bill! 

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@... wrote:

 Yeeaaay, Edgar and Bill are in total agreement, finally!
 
 :-)
 Siska
 -Original Message-
 From: Edgar Owen edgarowen@...
 Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 07:55:25 
 To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [Zen] Nice Quote
 
 Bill,
 
 Total agreement as stated.
 
 Just incorporate what I said yesterday that these forms exist in reality 
 instead of in your nutty head and you'll have the whole meaning..
 
 Edgar
 
 
 
 On May 25, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Bill! wrote:
 
  
  Siska,
  
  As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar opposite opinion 
  on just about everything.  In fact he'll probably disagree with this 
  statement ;) and will certainly jump all over the rest of this post.
  
  Rumi's poem/metaphor was:
  
  I looked for my self,
  But my self was gone.
  The boundaries of my being
  Had disappeared in the sea.
  Waves broke.  Awareness rose again.
  And a voice returned me to myself.
  It always happens like this.
  Sea turns on itself and foams,
  And with every foaming bit another body.
  Another being takes form.
  And when the sea sends word,
  Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
  - Rumi
  
  I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves form, come 
  rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend themselves by slipping 
  back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha Nature and later composing 
  this poem.  My interpretation of it is:
  
  I looked for my self,
  But my self was gone.
  The boundaries of my being
  Had disappeared in the sea.
  
  Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature.  The illusion 
  of dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as something independent 
  and apart from everything else has vanished with it.  It has vanished into 
  sea which is a metaphor for emptiness.
  
  Waves broke.  Awareness rose again.
  And a voice returned me to myself.
  It always happens like this.
  
  Dualism returns.  His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has been 
  interrupted and his illusion of self has returned.  This alternation 
  between holism and dualism, between emptiness and self happens regularly, 
  much like the waves surging rhythmically upon the beach. 
  
  Sea turns on itself and foams,
  And with every foaming bit another body.
  Another being takes form.
  
  Now that he is abiding in dualism all other illusions, perceptions, 
  thoughts, etc..., of all other (10,000) things appear.
  
  And when the sea sends word,
  Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
  
  But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions melt back 
  into emptiness.
  
  That's my reading of this anyway.  It will be interesting to see what Edgar 
  comes up with although I think I could almost write it for him...
  
  ...Bill!
  
  --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:
  
   Hi Bill,
   
   I followed until: Waves broke.
   
   The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.
   
   Siska
   -Original Message-
   From: Bill! BillSmart@
   Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
   Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29 
   To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
   Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
   Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote
   
   
   ..Bill!
  
  
 






Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-26 Thread Edgar Owen
@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen edgarowen@ wrote:
   
Bill,
   
People don't decide whether illusions are real or not. Reality does! 
Get that through your solipsistic head!
   
Edgar
   
   
   
On May 25, 2013, at 9:11 AM, Bill! wrote:
   
 Edgar,

 As long as you agree dualism is an illusion you can call it 
 'reality' if you wish. I don't agree, but we can let others decide 
 for themselves if illusions are real or not.

 ...Bill!

 --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen edgarowen@ wrote:
 
  Bill,
 
  Total agreement as stated.
 
  Just incorporate what I said yesterday that these forms exist in 
  reality instead of in your nutty head and you'll have the whole 
  meaning..
 
  Edgar
 
 
 
  On May 25, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Bill! wrote:
 
  
   Siska,
  
   As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar 
   opposite opinion on just about everything. In fact he'll 
   probably disagree with this statement ;) and will certainly 
   jump all over the rest of this post.
  
   Rumi's poem/metaphor was:
  
   I looked for my self,
   But my self was gone.
   The boundaries of my being
   Had disappeared in the sea.
   Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
   And a voice returned me to myself.
   It always happens like this.
   Sea turns on itself and foams,
   And with every foaming bit another body.
   Another being takes form.
   And when the sea sends word,
   Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
   - Rumi
  
   I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the 
   waves form, come rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then 
   spend themselves by slipping back into the sea - losing himself 
   in Buddha Nature and later composing this poem. My 
   interpretation of it is:
  
   I looked for my self,
   But my self was gone.
   The boundaries of my being
   Had disappeared in the sea.
  
   Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature. 
   The illusion of dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' 
   as something independent and apart from everything else has 
   vanished with it. It has vanished into sea which is a metaphor 
   for emptiness.
  
   Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
   And a voice returned me to myself.
   It always happens like this.
  
   Dualism returns. His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has 
   been interrupted and his illusion of self has returned. This 
   alternation between holism and dualism, between emptiness and 
   self happens regularly, much like the waves surging 
   rhythmically upon the beach.
  
   Sea turns on itself and foams,
   And with every foaming bit another body.
   Another being takes form.
  
   Now that he is abiding in dualism all other illusions, 
   perceptions, thoughts, etc..., of all other (10,000) things 
   appear.
  
   And when the sea sends word,
   Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
  
   But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions 
   melt back into emptiness.
  
   That's my reading of this anyway. It will be interesting to see 
   what Edgar comes up with although I think I could almost write 
   it for him...
  
   ...Bill!
  
   --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:
   
Hi Bill,
   
I followed until: Waves broke.
   
The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.
   
Siska
-Original Message-
From: Bill! BillSmart@
Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote
   
   
..Bill!
   
  
  
 


   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or 
   are reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
  
 
 
 



Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-26 Thread Merle Lester
 whether illusions are real or not. Reality does! 
   Get that through your solipsistic head!
  
   Edgar
  
  
  
   On May 25, 2013, at 9:11 AM, Bill! wrote:
  
Edgar,
   
As long as you agree dualism is an illusion you can call it 
'reality' if you wish. I don't agree, but we can let others decide 
for themselves if illusions are real or not.
   
...Bill!
   
--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen edgarowen@ wrote:

 Bill,

 Total agreement as stated.

 Just incorporate what I said yesterday that these forms exist in 
 reality instead of in your nutty head and you'll have the whole 
 meaning..

 Edgar



 On May 25, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Bill! wrote:

 
  Siska,
 
  As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar 
  opposite opinion on just about everything. In fact he'll 
  probably disagree with this statement ;) and will certainly 
  jump all over the rest of this post.
 
  Rumi's poem/metaphor was:
 
  I looked for my self,
  But my self was gone.
  The boundaries of my being
  Had disappeared in the sea.
  Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
  And a voice returned me to myself.
  It always happens like this.
  Sea turns on itself and foams,
  And with every foaming bit another body.
  Another being takes form.
  And when the sea sends word,
  Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
  - Rumi
 
  I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves 
  form, come rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend 
  themselves by slipping back into the sea - losing himself in 
  Buddha Nature and later composing this poem. My interpretation 
  of it is:
 
  I looked for my self,
  But my self was gone.
  The boundaries of my being
  Had disappeared in the sea.
 
  Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature. The 
  illusion of dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as 
  something independent and apart from everything else has 
  vanished with it. It has vanished into sea which is a metaphor 
  for emptiness.
 
  Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
  And a voice returned me to myself.
  It always happens like this.
 
  Dualism returns. His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has 
  been interrupted and his illusion of self has returned. This 
  alternation between holism and dualism, between emptiness and 
  self happens regularly, much like the waves surging rhythmically 
  upon the beach.
 
  Sea turns on itself and foams,
  And with every foaming bit another body.
  Another being takes form.
 
  Now that he is abiding in dualism all other illusions, 
  perceptions, thoughts, etc..., of all other (10,000) things 
  appear.
 
  And when the sea sends word,
  Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
 
  But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions 
  melt back into emptiness.
 
  That's my reading of this anyway. It will be interesting to see 
  what Edgar comes up with although I think I could almost write 
  it for him...
 
  ...Bill!
 
  --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:
  
   Hi Bill,
  
   I followed until: Waves broke.
  
   The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.
  
   Siska
   -Original Message-
   From: Bill! BillSmart@
   Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
   Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29
   To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
   Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
   Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote
  
  
   ..Bill!
  
 
 

   
   
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
  reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 




 

Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-26 Thread Edgar Owen
Bill,

NO!

You claim that the forms arise in YOUR mind.

But YOUR mind IS A FORM. Is one of the forms that arises.

I've told you a hundred times that forms CANNOT arise in what does not exist!

Forms arise - and only then are they categorized into the duality of mind and 
not mind.

So you cannot say that forms arise in your mind because your mind does not yet 
exist when the forms arise.

Therefore forms arise as experience - but NOT the experience of any mind.

Therefor what exists and manifests cannot be said to either arise in mind OR 
external world, since these are both forms that arise.

So the true and proper view is that pure experience is the fundamental reality, 
but this is just pure experience prior to the dualism of experiencer and 
experienced.

Therefore your claim that forms arise in YOUR mind is dead wrong...

At the most fundamental level forms just arise.

What do they arise within? They arise within Buddha Nature for that is all that 
is possible for anything to arise within.

Therefore the forms, as manifestations of Buddha Nature, are reality, because 
reality is the totality of all that exists.


Hopefully this will get through to you someday. It's so clear and obvious.

There are a couple of additional subtleties beyond this but I won't confuse you 
with them right now.

Edgar



On May 26, 2013, at 5:28 AM, Bill! wrote:

 Siska,
 
 No, unfortunately not.
 
 Edgar does this all the time. He says something that seems to agree with what 
 I've stated but then slips in one word that corrupts what I have stated. In 
 this case the word is 'forms'.
 
 Edgar believes forms (structure, rationality) exists independently of us and 
 we perceive it with our intellect. I believe we create the structures and 
 superimpose it upon our experiences to create our perceptions.
 
 The bottom line is I claim all thoughts are illusory and Edgar claims they 
 are part of reality.
 
 We have other disagreements but I still think most of them are semantic, but 
 in some cases they do indeed to be fundamental.
 
 Other than that all is well...Bill! 
 
 --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@... wrote:
 
  Yeeaaay, Edgar and Bill are in total agreement, finally!
  
  :-)
  Siska
  -Original Message-
  From: Edgar Owen edgarowen@...
  Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 07:55:25 
  To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: Re: [Zen] Nice Quote
  
  Bill,
  
  Total agreement as stated.
  
  Just incorporate what I said yesterday that these forms exist in reality 
  instead of in your nutty head and you'll have the whole meaning..
  
  Edgar
  
  
  
  On May 25, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Bill! wrote:
  
   
   Siska,
   
   As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar opposite 
   opinion on just about everything. In fact he'll probably disagree with 
   this statement ;) and will certainly jump all over the rest of this post.
   
   Rumi's poem/metaphor was:
   
   I looked for my self,
   But my self was gone.
   The boundaries of my being
   Had disappeared in the sea.
   Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
   And a voice returned me to myself.
   It always happens like this.
   Sea turns on itself and foams,
   And with every foaming bit another body.
   Another being takes form.
   And when the sea sends word,
   Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
   - Rumi
   
   I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves form, 
   come rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend themselves by 
   slipping back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha Nature and later 
   composing this poem. My interpretation of it is:
   
   I looked for my self,
   But my self was gone.
   The boundaries of my being
   Had disappeared in the sea.
   
   Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature. The illusion 
   of dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as something 
   independent and apart from everything else has vanished with it. It has 
   vanished into sea which is a metaphor for emptiness.
   
   Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
   And a voice returned me to myself.
   It always happens like this.
   
   Dualism returns. His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has been 
   interrupted and his illusion of self has returned. This alternation 
   between holism and dualism, between emptiness and self happens regularly, 
   much like the waves surging rhythmically upon the beach. 
   
   Sea turns on itself and foams,
   And with every foaming bit another body.
   Another being takes form.
   
   Now that he is abiding in dualism all other illusions, perceptions, 
   thoughts, etc..., of all other (10,000) things appear.
   
   And when the sea sends word,
   Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
   
   But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions melt back 
   into emptiness.
   
   That's my reading of this anyway. It will be interesting to see what

Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-26 Thread Edgar Owen
Siska,

See my reply to Bill where I explain..

Edgar


On May 26, 2013, at 6:12 AM, siska_...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Hi Bill,
 
  The bottom line is I claim all thoughts are illusory and Edgar claims they 
  are part of reality.
 
 If I understand correctly, you said, all thoughts are illusory because 
 'thoughts' to you is how we perceive the reality. And all is illusory because 
 we are still trapped in duality. 
 
 Also, if I understand correctly, Edgar said, whatever is in our head, that is 
 what it is. Whether or not they are illusory, they are what they are, the 
 reality.
 
 I think the two of you are not talking about exactly the same thing
 
 Siska
 
 From: Bill! billsm...@hhs1963.org
 Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 09:28:32 -
 To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 ReplyTo: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [Zen] Nice Quote
 
  
 Siska,
 
 No, unfortunately not.
 
 Edgar does this all the time. He says something that seems to agree with what 
 I've stated but then slips in one word that corrupts what I have stated. In 
 this case the word is 'forms'.
 
 Edgar believes forms (structure, rationality) exists independently of us and 
 we perceive it with our intellect. I believe we create the structures and 
 superimpose it upon our experiences to create our perceptions.
 
 The bottom line is I claim all thoughts are illusory and Edgar claims they 
 are part of reality.
 
 We have other disagreements but I still think most of them are semantic, but 
 in some cases they do indeed to be fundamental.
 
 Other than that all is well...Bill! 
 
 --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@... wrote:
 
  Yeeaaay, Edgar and Bill are in total agreement, finally!
  
  :-)
  Siska
  -Original Message-
  From: Edgar Owen edgarowen@...
  Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 07:55:25 
  To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: Re: [Zen] Nice Quote
  
  Bill,
  
  Total agreement as stated.
  
  Just incorporate what I said yesterday that these forms exist in reality 
  instead of in your nutty head and you'll have the whole meaning..
  
  Edgar
  
  
  
  On May 25, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Bill! wrote:
  
   
   Siska,
   
   As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar opposite 
   opinion on just about everything. In fact he'll probably disagree with 
   this statement ;) and will certainly jump all over the rest of this post.
   
   Rumi's poem/metaphor was:
   
   I looked for my self,
   But my self was gone.
   The boundaries of my being
   Had disappeared in the sea.
   Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
   And a voice returned me to myself.
   It always happens like this.
   Sea turns on itself and foams,
   And with every foaming bit another body.
   Another being takes form.
   And when the sea sends word,
   Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
   - Rumi
   
   I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves form, 
   come rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend themselves by 
   slipping back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha Nature and later 
   composing this poem. My interpretation of it is:
   
   I looked for my self,
   But my self was gone.
   The boundaries of my being
   Had disappeared in the sea.
   
   Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature. The illusion 
   of dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as something 
   independent and apart from everything else has vanished with it. It has 
   vanished into sea which is a metaphor for emptiness.
   
   Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
   And a voice returned me to myself.
   It always happens like this.
   
   Dualism returns. His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has been 
   interrupted and his illusion of self has returned. This alternation 
   between holism and dualism, between emptiness and self happens regularly, 
   much like the waves surging rhythmically upon the beach. 
   
   Sea turns on itself and foams,
   And with every foaming bit another body.
   Another being takes form.
   
   Now that he is abiding in dualism all other illusions, perceptions, 
   thoughts, etc..., of all other (10,000) things appear.
   
   And when the sea sends word,
   Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
   
   But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions melt back 
   into emptiness.
   
   That's my reading of this anyway. It will be interesting to see what 
   Edgar comes up with although I think I could almost write it for him...
   
   ...Bill!
   
   --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:
   
Hi Bill,

I followed until: Waves broke.

The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.

Siska
-Original Message-
From: Bill! BillSmart@
Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29 
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Reply-To: Zen_Forum

Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-26 Thread Edgar Owen
-270-6524
   On May 25, 2013 7:10 AM, Bill! BillSmart@... wrote:
   Edgar,
   
   People create illusions so why can't people decide on whether they're 
   real or not?
   
   I say they're not.
   
   ...Bill!
   
   --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen edgarowen@ wrote:
   
Bill,
   
People don't decide whether illusions are real or not. Reality does! 
Get that through your solipsistic head!
   
Edgar
   
   
   
On May 25, 2013, at 9:11 AM, Bill! wrote:
   
 Edgar,

 As long as you agree dualism is an illusion you can call it 
 'reality' if you wish. I don't agree, but we can let others decide 
 for themselves if illusions are real or not.

 ...Bill!

 --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen edgarowen@ wrote:
 
  Bill,
 
  Total agreement as stated.
 
  Just incorporate what I said yesterday that these forms exist in 
  reality instead of in your nutty head and you'll have the whole 
  meaning..
 
  Edgar
 
 
 
  On May 25, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Bill! wrote:
 
  
   Siska,
  
   As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar 
   opposite opinion on just about everything. In fact he'll 
   probably disagree with this statement ;) and will certainly 
   jump all over the rest of this post.
  
   Rumi's poem/metaphor was:
  
   I looked for my self,
   But my self was gone.
   The boundaries of my being
   Had disappeared in the sea.
   Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
   And a voice returned me to myself.
   It always happens like this.
   Sea turns on itself and foams,
   And with every foaming bit another body.
   Another being takes form.
   And when the sea sends word,
   Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
   - Rumi
  
   I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the 
   waves form, come rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and 
   then spend themselves by slipping back into the sea - losing 
   himself in Buddha Nature and later composing this poem. My 
   interpretation of it is:
  
   I looked for my self,
   But my self was gone.
   The boundaries of my being
   Had disappeared in the sea.
  
   Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature. 
   The illusion of dualism has vanished and his illusion of 
   'self' as something independent and apart from everything else 
   has vanished with it. It has vanished into sea which is a 
   metaphor for emptiness.
  
   Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
   And a voice returned me to myself.
   It always happens like this.
  
   Dualism returns. His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has 
   been interrupted and his illusion of self has returned. This 
   alternation between holism and dualism, between emptiness and 
   self happens regularly, much like the waves surging 
   rhythmically upon the beach.
  
   Sea turns on itself and foams,
   And with every foaming bit another body.
   Another being takes form.
  
   Now that he is abiding in dualism all other illusions, 
   perceptions, thoughts, etc..., of all other (10,000) things 
   appear.
  
   And when the sea sends word,
   Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
  
   But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions 
   melt back into emptiness.
  
   That's my reading of this anyway. It will be interesting to 
   see what Edgar comes up with although I think I could almost 
   write it for him...
  
   ...Bill!
  
   --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:
   
Hi Bill,
   
I followed until: Waves broke.
   
The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.
   
Siska
-Original Message-
From: Bill! BillSmart@
Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote
   
   
..Bill!
   
  
  
 


   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or 
   are reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-26 Thread Bill!
Edgar,

Forms are dualistic.  They only arise when your intellect creates dualism.  
That is the only place where they can 'exist', but they 'exist' there as 
illusions - like a dream.

...Bill!

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen edgarowen@... wrote:

 Bill,
 
 NO!
 
 You claim that the forms arise in YOUR mind.
 
 But YOUR mind IS A FORM. Is one of the forms that arises.
 
 I've told you a hundred times that forms CANNOT arise in what does not exist!
 
 Forms arise - and only then are they categorized into the duality of mind and 
 not mind.
 
 So you cannot say that forms arise in your mind because your mind does not 
 yet exist when the forms arise.
 
 Therefore forms arise as experience - but NOT the experience of any mind.
 
 Therefor what exists and manifests cannot be said to either arise in mind OR 
 external world, since these are both forms that arise.
 
 So the true and proper view is that pure experience is the fundamental 
 reality, but this is just pure experience prior to the dualism of experiencer 
 and experienced.
 
 Therefore your claim that forms arise in YOUR mind is dead wrong...
 
 At the most fundamental level forms just arise.
 
 What do they arise within? They arise within Buddha Nature for that is all 
 that is possible for anything to arise within.
 
 Therefore the forms, as manifestations of Buddha Nature, are reality, because 
 reality is the totality of all that exists.
 
 
 Hopefully this will get through to you someday. It's so clear and obvious.
 
 There are a couple of additional subtleties beyond this but I won't confuse 
 you with them right now.
 
 Edgar
 
 
 
 On May 26, 2013, at 5:28 AM, Bill! wrote:
 
  Siska,
  
  No, unfortunately not.
  
  Edgar does this all the time. He says something that seems to agree with 
  what I've stated but then slips in one word that corrupts what I have 
  stated. In this case the word is 'forms'.
  
  Edgar believes forms (structure, rationality) exists independently of us 
  and we perceive it with our intellect. I believe we create the structures 
  and superimpose it upon our experiences to create our perceptions.
  
  The bottom line is I claim all thoughts are illusory and Edgar claims they 
  are part of reality.
  
  We have other disagreements but I still think most of them are semantic, 
  but in some cases they do indeed to be fundamental.
  
  Other than that all is well...Bill! 
  
  --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:
  
   Yeeaaay, Edgar and Bill are in total agreement, finally!
   
   :-)
   Siska
   -Original Message-
   From: Edgar Owen edgarowen@
   Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
   Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 07:55:25 
   To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
   Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
   Subject: Re: [Zen] Nice Quote
   
   Bill,
   
   Total agreement as stated.
   
   Just incorporate what I said yesterday that these forms exist in reality 
   instead of in your nutty head and you'll have the whole meaning..
   
   Edgar
   
   
   
   On May 25, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Bill! wrote:
   

Siska,

As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar opposite 
opinion on just about everything. In fact he'll probably disagree with 
this statement ;) and will certainly jump all over the rest of this 
post.

Rumi's poem/metaphor was:

I looked for my self,
But my self was gone.
The boundaries of my being
Had disappeared in the sea.
Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
And a voice returned me to myself.
It always happens like this.
Sea turns on itself and foams,
And with every foaming bit another body.
Another being takes form.
And when the sea sends word,
Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
- Rumi

I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves form, 
come rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend themselves by 
slipping back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha Nature and later 
composing this poem. My interpretation of it is:

I looked for my self,
But my self was gone.
The boundaries of my being
Had disappeared in the sea.

Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature. The 
illusion of dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as 
something independent and apart from everything else has vanished with 
it. It has vanished into sea which is a metaphor for emptiness.

Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
And a voice returned me to myself.
It always happens like this.

Dualism returns. His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has been 
interrupted and his illusion of self has returned. This alternation 
between holism and dualism, between emptiness and self happens 
regularly, much like the waves surging rhythmically upon the beach. 

Sea turns on itself and foams,
And with every foaming bit another body.
Another being

Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-26 Thread Edgar Owen
No, you still don't get the obvious.

I give up!

Edgar



On May 26, 2013, at 8:47 AM, Bill! wrote:

 Edgar,
 
 Forms are dualistic. They only arise when your intellect creates dualism. 
 That is the only place where they can 'exist', but they 'exist' there as 
 illusions - like a dream.
 
 ...Bill!
 
 --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen edgarowen@... wrote:
 
  Bill,
  
  NO!
  
  You claim that the forms arise in YOUR mind.
  
  But YOUR mind IS A FORM. Is one of the forms that arises.
  
  I've told you a hundred times that forms CANNOT arise in what does not 
  exist!
  
  Forms arise - and only then are they categorized into the duality of mind 
  and not mind.
  
  So you cannot say that forms arise in your mind because your mind does not 
  yet exist when the forms arise.
  
  Therefore forms arise as experience - but NOT the experience of any mind.
  
  Therefor what exists and manifests cannot be said to either arise in mind 
  OR external world, since these are both forms that arise.
  
  So the true and proper view is that pure experience is the fundamental 
  reality, but this is just pure experience prior to the dualism of 
  experiencer and experienced.
  
  Therefore your claim that forms arise in YOUR mind is dead wrong...
  
  At the most fundamental level forms just arise.
  
  What do they arise within? They arise within Buddha Nature for that is all 
  that is possible for anything to arise within.
  
  Therefore the forms, as manifestations of Buddha Nature, are reality, 
  because reality is the totality of all that exists.
  
  
  Hopefully this will get through to you someday. It's so clear and obvious.
  
  There are a couple of additional subtleties beyond this but I won't confuse 
  you with them right now.
  
  Edgar
  
  
  
  On May 26, 2013, at 5:28 AM, Bill! wrote:
  
   Siska,
   
   No, unfortunately not.
   
   Edgar does this all the time. He says something that seems to agree with 
   what I've stated but then slips in one word that corrupts what I have 
   stated. In this case the word is 'forms'.
   
   Edgar believes forms (structure, rationality) exists independently of us 
   and we perceive it with our intellect. I believe we create the structures 
   and superimpose it upon our experiences to create our perceptions.
   
   The bottom line is I claim all thoughts are illusory and Edgar claims 
   they are part of reality.
   
   We have other disagreements but I still think most of them are semantic, 
   but in some cases they do indeed to be fundamental.
   
   Other than that all is well...Bill! 
   
   --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:
   
Yeeaaay, Edgar and Bill are in total agreement, finally!

:-)
Siska
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Owen edgarowen@
Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 07:55:25 
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

Bill,

Total agreement as stated.

Just incorporate what I said yesterday that these forms exist in 
reality instead of in your nutty head and you'll have the whole 
meaning..

Edgar



On May 25, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Bill! wrote:

 
 Siska,
 
 As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar opposite 
 opinion on just about everything. In fact he'll probably disagree 
 with this statement ;) and will certainly jump all over the rest of 
 this post.
 
 Rumi's poem/metaphor was:
 
 I looked for my self,
 But my self was gone.
 The boundaries of my being
 Had disappeared in the sea.
 Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
 And a voice returned me to myself.
 It always happens like this.
 Sea turns on itself and foams,
 And with every foaming bit another body.
 Another being takes form.
 And when the sea sends word,
 Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
 - Rumi
 
 I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves 
 form, come rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend 
 themselves by slipping back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha 
 Nature and later composing this poem. My interpretation of it is:
 
 I looked for my self,
 But my self was gone.
 The boundaries of my being
 Had disappeared in the sea.
 
 Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature. The 
 illusion of dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as 
 something independent and apart from everything else has vanished 
 with it. It has vanished into sea which is a metaphor for emptiness.
 
 Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
 And a voice returned me to myself.
 It always happens like this.
 
 Dualism returns. His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has been 
 interrupted and his illusion of self has returned

Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-26 Thread Bill!
Edgar,

Giving up is good.  That's what many zen teaching techniques are designed to 
do, and in particular koans.  They are intended to drive you to the point where 
you give up on your attempts to find an intellectual (rational) answer or 
response to the koan.  It's then when the intellect quiesces that you may 
experience Buddha Nature.

...Bill!

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen edgarowen@... wrote:

 No, you still don't get the obvious.
 
 I give up!
 
 Edgar
 
 
 
 On May 26, 2013, at 8:47 AM, Bill! wrote:
 
  Edgar,
  
  Forms are dualistic. They only arise when your intellect creates dualism. 
  That is the only place where they can 'exist', but they 'exist' there as 
  illusions - like a dream.
  
  ...Bill!
  
  --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen edgarowen@ wrote:
  
   Bill,
   
   NO!
   
   You claim that the forms arise in YOUR mind.
   
   But YOUR mind IS A FORM. Is one of the forms that arises.
   
   I've told you a hundred times that forms CANNOT arise in what does not 
   exist!
   
   Forms arise - and only then are they categorized into the duality of mind 
   and not mind.
   
   So you cannot say that forms arise in your mind because your mind does 
   not yet exist when the forms arise.
   
   Therefore forms arise as experience - but NOT the experience of any mind.
   
   Therefor what exists and manifests cannot be said to either arise in mind 
   OR external world, since these are both forms that arise.
   
   So the true and proper view is that pure experience is the fundamental 
   reality, but this is just pure experience prior to the dualism of 
   experiencer and experienced.
   
   Therefore your claim that forms arise in YOUR mind is dead wrong...
   
   At the most fundamental level forms just arise.
   
   What do they arise within? They arise within Buddha Nature for that is 
   all that is possible for anything to arise within.
   
   Therefore the forms, as manifestations of Buddha Nature, are reality, 
   because reality is the totality of all that exists.
   
   
   Hopefully this will get through to you someday. It's so clear and obvious.
   
   There are a couple of additional subtleties beyond this but I won't 
   confuse you with them right now.
   
   Edgar
   
   
   
   On May 26, 2013, at 5:28 AM, Bill! wrote:
   
Siska,

No, unfortunately not.

Edgar does this all the time. He says something that seems to agree 
with what I've stated but then slips in one word that corrupts what I 
have stated. In this case the word is 'forms'.

Edgar believes forms (structure, rationality) exists independently of 
us and we perceive it with our intellect. I believe we create the 
structures and superimpose it upon our experiences to create our 
perceptions.

The bottom line is I claim all thoughts are illusory and Edgar claims 
they are part of reality.

We have other disagreements but I still think most of them are 
semantic, but in some cases they do indeed to be fundamental.

Other than that all is well...Bill! 

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:

 Yeeaaay, Edgar and Bill are in total agreement, finally!
 
 :-)
 Siska
 -Original Message-
 From: Edgar Owen edgarowen@
 Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 07:55:25 
 To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [Zen] Nice Quote
 
 Bill,
 
 Total agreement as stated.
 
 Just incorporate what I said yesterday that these forms exist in 
 reality instead of in your nutty head and you'll have the whole 
 meaning..
 
 Edgar
 
 
 
 On May 25, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Bill! wrote:
 
  
  Siska,
  
  As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar opposite 
  opinion on just about everything. In fact he'll probably disagree 
  with this statement ;) and will certainly jump all over the rest 
  of this post.
  
  Rumi's poem/metaphor was:
  
  I looked for my self,
  But my self was gone.
  The boundaries of my being
  Had disappeared in the sea.
  Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
  And a voice returned me to myself.
  It always happens like this.
  Sea turns on itself and foams,
  And with every foaming bit another body.
  Another being takes form.
  And when the sea sends word,
  Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
  - Rumi
  
  I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves 
  form, come rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend 
  themselves by slipping back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha 
  Nature and later composing this poem. My interpretation of it is:
  
  I looked for my self,
  But my self was gone.
  The boundaries of my being
  Had

Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-26 Thread Chris Austin-Lane
Your mind.

I think the illusory word there is your, moreso than mind.

Thanks,
--Chris
301-270-6524
 On May 26, 2013 5:10 AM, Edgar Owen edgaro...@att.net wrote:



 Bill,

 NO!

 You claim that the forms arise in YOUR mind.

 But YOUR mind IS A FORM. Is one of the forms that arises.

 I've told you a hundred times that forms CANNOT arise in what does not
 exist!

 Forms arise - and only then are they categorized into the duality of mind
 and not mind.

 So you cannot say that forms arise in your mind because your mind does not
 yet exist when the forms arise.

 Therefore forms arise as experience - but NOT the experience of any mind.

 Therefor what exists and manifests cannot be said to either arise in mind
 OR external world, since these are both forms that arise.

 So the true and proper view is that pure experience is the fundamental
 reality, but this is just pure experience prior to the dualism of
 experiencer and experienced.

  divTherefore your claim that forms arise in YOUR mind is dead wrong...

 At the most fundamental level forms just arise.

 What do they arise within? They arise within Buddha Nature for that is all
 that is possible for anything to arise within.

 Therefore the forms, as manifestations of Buddha Nature, are reality,
 because reality is the totality of all that exists.


 Hopefully this will get through to you someday. It's so clear and obvious.

 There are a couple of additional subtleties beyond this but I won't
 confuse you with them right now.

 Edgar



 On May 26, 2013, at 5:28 AM, Bill! wrote:



 Siska,

 No, unfortunately not.

 Edgar does this all the time. He says something that seems to agree with
 what I've stated but then slips in one word that corrupts what I have
 stated. In this case the word is 'forms'.

 Edgar believes forms (structure, rationality) exists independently of us
 and we perceive it with our intellect. I believe we create the structures
 and superimpose it upon our experiences to create our perceptions.

 The bottom line is I claim all thoughts are illusory and Edgar claims they
 are part of reality.

 We have other disagreements but I still think most of them are semantic,
 but in some cases they do indeed to be fundamental.

 Other than that all is well...Bill!

 --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@... wrote:
 
  Yeeaaay, Edgar and Bill are in total agreement, finally!
 
  :-)
  Siska
  -Original Message-
  From: Edgar Owen edgarowen@...
  Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 07:55:25
  To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: Re: [Zen] Nice Quote
 
  Bill,
 
  Total agreement as stated.
 
  Just incorporate what I said yesterday that these forms exist in reality
 instead of in your nutty head and you'll have the whole meaning..
 
  Edgar
 
 
 
  On May 25, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Bill! wrote:
 
  
   Siska,
  
   As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar opposite
 opinion on just about everything. In fact he'll probably disagree with this
 statement ;) and will certainly jump all over the rest of this post.
  
   Rumi's poem/metaphor was:
  
   I looked for my self,
   But my self was gone.
   The boundaries of my being
   Had disappeared in the sea.
   Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
   And a voice returned me to myself.
   It always happens like this.
   Sea turns on itself and foams,
   And with every foaming bit another body.
   Another being takes form.
   And when the sea sends word,
   Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
   - Rumi
  
   I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves form,
 come rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend themselves by
 slipping back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha Nature and later
 composing this poem. My interpretation of it is:
  
   I looked for my self,
   But my self was gone.
   The boundaries of my being
   Had disappeared in the sea.
  
   Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature. The
 illusion of dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as something
 independent and apart from everything else has vanished with it. It has
 vanished into sea which is a metaphor for emptiness.
  
   Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
   And a voice returned me to myself.
   It always happens like this.
  
   Dualism returns. His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has been
 interrupted and his illusion of self has returned. This alternation between
 holism and dualism, between emptiness and self happens regularly, much like
 the waves surging rhythmically upon the beach.
  
   Sea turns on itself and foams,
   And with every foaming bit another body.
   Another being takes form.
  
   Now that he is abiding in dualism all other illusions, perceptions,
 thoughts, etc..., of all other (10,000) things appear.
  
   And when the sea sends word,
   Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
  
   But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all

Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-26 Thread Edgar Owen
Bill,

That's the Zen for Dummies approach. 

The superior approach is to actually SOLVE the koan. When you truly understand 
it realization appears!

Edgar



On May 26, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Bill! wrote:

 Edgar,
 
 Giving up is good. That's what many zen teaching techniques are designed to 
 do, and in particular koans. They are intended to drive you to the point 
 where you give up on your attempts to find an intellectual (rational) answer 
 or response to the koan. It's then when the intellect quiesces that you may 
 experience Buddha Nature.
 
 ...Bill!
 
 --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen edgarowen@... wrote:
 
  No, you still don't get the obvious.
  
  I give up!
  
  Edgar
  
  
  
  On May 26, 2013, at 8:47 AM, Bill! wrote:
  
   Edgar,
   
   Forms are dualistic. They only arise when your intellect creates dualism. 
   That is the only place where they can 'exist', but they 'exist' there as 
   illusions - like a dream.
   
   ...Bill!
   
   --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen edgarowen@ wrote:
   
Bill,

NO!

You claim that the forms arise in YOUR mind.

But YOUR mind IS A FORM. Is one of the forms that arises.

I've told you a hundred times that forms CANNOT arise in what does not 
exist!

Forms arise - and only then are they categorized into the duality of 
mind and not mind.

So you cannot say that forms arise in your mind because your mind does 
not yet exist when the forms arise.

Therefore forms arise as experience - but NOT the experience of any 
mind.

Therefor what exists and manifests cannot be said to either arise in 
mind OR external world, since these are both forms that arise.

So the true and proper view is that pure experience is the fundamental 
reality, but this is just pure experience prior to the dualism of 
experiencer and experienced.

Therefore your claim that forms arise in YOUR mind is dead wrong...

At the most fundamental level forms just arise.

What do they arise within? They arise within Buddha Nature for that is 
all that is possible for anything to arise within.

Therefore the forms, as manifestations of Buddha Nature, are reality, 
because reality is the totality of all that exists.


Hopefully this will get through to you someday. It's so clear and 
obvious.

There are a couple of additional subtleties beyond this but I won't 
confuse you with them right now.

Edgar



On May 26, 2013, at 5:28 AM, Bill! wrote:

 Siska,
 
 No, unfortunately not.
 
 Edgar does this all the time. He says something that seems to agree 
 with what I've stated but then slips in one word that corrupts what I 
 have stated. In this case the word is 'forms'.
 
 Edgar believes forms (structure, rationality) exists independently of 
 us and we perceive it with our intellect. I believe we create the 
 structures and superimpose it upon our experiences to create our 
 perceptions.
 
 The bottom line is I claim all thoughts are illusory and Edgar claims 
 they are part of reality.
 
 We have other disagreements but I still think most of them are 
 semantic, but in some cases they do indeed to be fundamental.
 
 Other than that all is well...Bill! 
 
 --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:
 
  Yeeaaay, Edgar and Bill are in total agreement, finally!
  
  :-)
  Siska
  -Original Message-
  From: Edgar Owen edgarowen@
  Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 07:55:25 
  To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: Re: [Zen] Nice Quote
  
  Bill,
  
  Total agreement as stated.
  
  Just incorporate what I said yesterday that these forms exist in 
  reality instead of in your nutty head and you'll have the whole 
  meaning..
  
  Edgar
  
  
  
  On May 25, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Bill! wrote:
  
   
   Siska,
   
   As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar 
   opposite opinion on just about everything. In fact he'll probably 
   disagree with this statement ;) and will certainly jump all over 
   the rest of this post.
   
   Rumi's poem/metaphor was:
   
   I looked for my self,
   But my self was gone.
   The boundaries of my being
   Had disappeared in the sea.
   Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
   And a voice returned me to myself.
   It always happens like this.
   Sea turns on itself and foams,
   And with every foaming bit another body.
   Another being takes form.
   And when the sea sends word,
   Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
   - Rumi
   
   I can just imagine Rumi

Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-26 Thread Joe
Bill!,

Too facile.

In this case I agree with Edgar (Ta-da!).

I think he's right that he is not a person!

;-]

--Joe

 Bill! BillSmart@... wrote:

 Edgar,
 
 People create illusions so why can't people decide on whether they're real or 
 not?
 
 I say they're not.






Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-26 Thread Joe
Chris,

One can certainly, with the right motivation, get the pants OFF in a hurry, 
sometimes, AND the under-things, with NO thought at all.  

Sometimes with too little thought; alas.

--Joe / singing the jilted-lover

 Chris Austin-Lane chris@... wrote:
 
 I also am pretty sure one may put pants on without having an effective 
 reasonable model of computation externalized.  One may just put the pants on.






Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-26 Thread Joe
Group; Edgar, Merle, Bill!,

Even if Edgar is relatively wrong, Merle is ABSOLUTELY right, here.

Again: Merle wields the Wisdom-Sword of Manjushri!

Edgar takes a good haircut.

All Hail!

--Joe / the Ref

 Merle Lester merlewiitpom@... wrote:

 no it's nature and how she works!... merle
   

 Bill,
 
 It's an intelligently computed reaction...
 
 Edgar






Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-26 Thread Joe
Edgar,

I think what you really mean is that Nature is not a Western female (as you 
wrote a few hundred posts back).

What a slap in the face!

I mean, I hope it results in that.  ;-)

Cruisin' for a bruisin'!

(You obviously do not know any Arizona women.  It's not west coast, but, 
instead, authentically Western, here).  I think you'd survive about 18 
minutes here, enough to fill Nixon's gap.

Pardner.  ;-)

--Joe

 Edgar Owen edgarowen@... wrote:

 Merle,
 
 Nature works intelligently.
 
 And nature is NOT a she.
 
 Nature is much too intelligent to be a SHE!






Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-26 Thread Joe
Bill!,

A beautiful gem (of a statement of understanding, and the progress of Practice).

Put it in a Tiffany mount, and show it around!

Oh, it already is.

Here 'tis again.

w/ tnx,

--Joe

 Bill! BillSmart@... wrote:

 Edgar,
 
 Giving up is good.  That's what many zen teaching techniques are designed to 
 do, and in particular koans.  They are intended to drive you to the point 
 where you give up on your attempts to find an intellectual (rational) answer 
 or response to the koan.  It's then when the intellect quiesces that you may 
 experience Buddha Nature.






Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-26 Thread Bill!
Chris,

I know this was a reply to Edgar's post below, but I wasn't sure if it was in 
support or qualifying his post.

I agree with you that the 'your' part of 'your mind' is the critical qualifier 
that signals illusion.  This is because it signals dualism.

So yes, I do claim forms arise in the duality created by 'your mind'.  If 'your 
mind' does not exist then duality does not exist; then there is only the One 
Mind, the Original Mind - Buddha Nature.

...Bill!

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Chris Austin-Lane chris@... wrote:

 Your mind.
 
 I think the illusory word there is your, moreso than mind.
 
 Thanks,
 --Chris
 301-270-6524
  On May 26, 2013 5:10 AM, Edgar Owen edgarowen@... wrote:
 
 
 
  Bill,
 
  NO!
 
  You claim that the forms arise in YOUR mind.
 
  But YOUR mind IS A FORM. Is one of the forms that arises.
 
  I've told you a hundred times that forms CANNOT arise in what does not
  exist!
 
  Forms arise - and only then are they categorized into the duality of mind
  and not mind.
 
  So you cannot say that forms arise in your mind because your mind does not
  yet exist when the forms arise.
 
  Therefore forms arise as experience - but NOT the experience of any mind.
 
  Therefor what exists and manifests cannot be said to either arise in mind
  OR external world, since these are both forms that arise.
 
  So the true and proper view is that pure experience is the fundamental
  reality, but this is just pure experience prior to the dualism of
  experiencer and experienced.
 
   divTherefore your claim that forms arise in YOUR mind is dead wrong...
 
  At the most fundamental level forms just arise.
 
  What do they arise within? They arise within Buddha Nature for that is all
  that is possible for anything to arise within.
 
  Therefore the forms, as manifestations of Buddha Nature, are reality,
  because reality is the totality of all that exists.
 
 
  Hopefully this will get through to you someday. It's so clear and obvious.
 
  There are a couple of additional subtleties beyond this but I won't
  confuse you with them right now.
 
  Edgar
 
 
 
  On May 26, 2013, at 5:28 AM, Bill! wrote:
 
 
 
  Siska,
 
  No, unfortunately not.
 
  Edgar does this all the time. He says something that seems to agree with
  what I've stated but then slips in one word that corrupts what I have
  stated. In this case the word is 'forms'.
 
  Edgar believes forms (structure, rationality) exists independently of us
  and we perceive it with our intellect. I believe we create the structures
  and superimpose it upon our experiences to create our perceptions.
 
  The bottom line is I claim all thoughts are illusory and Edgar claims they
  are part of reality.
 
  We have other disagreements but I still think most of them are semantic,
  but in some cases they do indeed to be fundamental.
 
  Other than that all is well...Bill!
 
  --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:
  
   Yeeaaay, Edgar and Bill are in total agreement, finally!
  
   :-)
   Siska
   -Original Message-
   From: Edgar Owen edgarowen@
   Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
   Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 07:55:25
   To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
   Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
   Subject: Re: [Zen] Nice Quote
  
   Bill,
  
   Total agreement as stated.
  
   Just incorporate what I said yesterday that these forms exist in reality
  instead of in your nutty head and you'll have the whole meaning..
  
   Edgar
  
  
  
   On May 25, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Bill! wrote:
  
   
Siska,
   
As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar opposite
  opinion on just about everything. In fact he'll probably disagree with this
  statement ;) and will certainly jump all over the rest of this post.
   
Rumi's poem/metaphor was:
   
I looked for my self,
But my self was gone.
The boundaries of my being
Had disappeared in the sea.
Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
And a voice returned me to myself.
It always happens like this.
Sea turns on itself and foams,
And with every foaming bit another body.
Another being takes form.
And when the sea sends word,
Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
- Rumi
   
I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves form,
  come rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend themselves by
  slipping back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha Nature and later
  composing this poem. My interpretation of it is:
   
I looked for my self,
But my self was gone.
The boundaries of my being
Had disappeared in the sea.
   
Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature. The
  illusion of dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as something
  independent and apart from everything else has vanished with it. It has
  vanished into sea which is a metaphor for emptiness.
   
Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
And a voice returned me to myself

Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-26 Thread Joe
Bill!, Chris,

A bodhisattva might still take on the conventionalization of a your, or a 
my, just so as not to weird you out, and to be of help or service.  This too 
is called Compassion.

It's not impossible to do this, even in the awakened state.  Mind you, it may 
not be easy, but it's not impossible.  Not once you see, after a while, what's 
at stake, and feel one's true responsibility to be not only honest, but 
effective.  This is the depth and sincerity of the life and career of a 
bodhisattva.  You've got to walk all sides of the street, not just two sides, 
...or One!  Especially NOT one!

Dualism bites.  But not if you're un-bitten.  Then you can use it for the sake 
of all beings.  And you had better: it's one of the best tools in our medical 
bag.

But don't try this at Home, unless you've been to the trenches, please.  Go to 
the trenches, NOW.

--Joe

 Bill! BillSmart@... wrote:

 Chris,
 
 I know this was a reply to Edgar's post below, but I wasn't sure if it was in 
 support or qualifying his post.
 
 I agree with you that the 'your' part of 'your mind' is the critical 
 qualifier that signals illusion.  This is because it signals dualism.
 
 So yes, I do claim forms arise in the duality created by 'your mind'.  If 
 'your mind' does not exist then duality does not exist; then there is only 
 the One Mind, the Original Mind - Buddha Nature.






Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-26 Thread Bill!
Edgar,

You don't 'solve' koans, if by 'solving' you mean 'put them into a nice, clean, 
rational perspective'.  Like Merle said several posts ago, 'Zen is not about 
grasping'.

You don't 'grasp' or 'solve' or 'understand' koans or Buddha Nature or zen.  
You experience them.  You live them.

...Bill!  

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen edgarowen@... wrote:

 Bill,
 
 That's the Zen for Dummies approach. 
 
 The superior approach is to actually SOLVE the koan. When you truly 
 understand it realization appears!
 
 Edgar
 
 
 
 On May 26, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Bill! wrote:
 
  Edgar,
  
  Giving up is good. That's what many zen teaching techniques are designed to 
  do, and in particular koans. They are intended to drive you to the point 
  where you give up on your attempts to find an intellectual (rational) 
  answer or response to the koan. It's then when the intellect quiesces that 
  you may experience Buddha Nature.
  
  ...Bill!
  
  --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen edgarowen@ wrote:
  
   No, you still don't get the obvious.
   
   I give up!
   
   Edgar
   
   
   
   On May 26, 2013, at 8:47 AM, Bill! wrote:
   
Edgar,

Forms are dualistic. They only arise when your intellect creates 
dualism. That is the only place where they can 'exist', but they 
'exist' there as illusions - like a dream.

...Bill!

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen edgarowen@ wrote:

 Bill,
 
 NO!
 
 You claim that the forms arise in YOUR mind.
 
 But YOUR mind IS A FORM. Is one of the forms that arises.
 
 I've told you a hundred times that forms CANNOT arise in what does 
 not exist!
 
 Forms arise - and only then are they categorized into the duality of 
 mind and not mind.
 
 So you cannot say that forms arise in your mind because your mind 
 does not yet exist when the forms arise.
 
 Therefore forms arise as experience - but NOT the experience of any 
 mind.
 
 Therefor what exists and manifests cannot be said to either arise in 
 mind OR external world, since these are both forms that arise.
 
 So the true and proper view is that pure experience is the 
 fundamental reality, but this is just pure experience prior to the 
 dualism of experiencer and experienced.
 
 Therefore your claim that forms arise in YOUR mind is dead wrong...
 
 At the most fundamental level forms just arise.
 
 What do they arise within? They arise within Buddha Nature for that 
 is all that is possible for anything to arise within.
 
 Therefore the forms, as manifestations of Buddha Nature, are reality, 
 because reality is the totality of all that exists.
 
 
 Hopefully this will get through to you someday. It's so clear and 
 obvious.
 
 There are a couple of additional subtleties beyond this but I won't 
 confuse you with them right now.
 
 Edgar
 
 
 
 On May 26, 2013, at 5:28 AM, Bill! wrote:
 
  Siska,
  
  No, unfortunately not.
  
  Edgar does this all the time. He says something that seems to agree 
  with what I've stated but then slips in one word that corrupts what 
  I have stated. In this case the word is 'forms'.
  
  Edgar believes forms (structure, rationality) exists independently 
  of us and we perceive it with our intellect. I believe we create 
  the structures and superimpose it upon our experiences to create 
  our perceptions.
  
  The bottom line is I claim all thoughts are illusory and Edgar 
  claims they are part of reality.
  
  We have other disagreements but I still think most of them are 
  semantic, but in some cases they do indeed to be fundamental.
  
  Other than that all is well...Bill! 
  
  --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:
  
   Yeeaaay, Edgar and Bill are in total agreement, finally!
   
   :-)
   Siska
   -Original Message-
   From: Edgar Owen edgarowen@
   Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
   Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 07:55:25 
   To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
   Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
   Subject: Re: [Zen] Nice Quote
   
   Bill,
   
   Total agreement as stated.
   
   Just incorporate what I said yesterday that these forms exist in 
   reality instead of in your nutty head and you'll have the whole 
   meaning..
   
   Edgar
   
   
   
   On May 25, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Bill! wrote:
   

Siska,

As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar 
opposite opinion on just about everything. In fact he'll 
probably disagree with this statement ;) and will certainly 
jump all over the rest of this post.

Rumi's poem/metaphor

Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-26 Thread Chris Austin-Lane
I find it amusing when email purporting to be from the view point of the
absolute includes such watch phrases as Me or Mine or You or Yours. Mind is
just mind, water is just water. But whose water?

Thanks,
--Chris
301-270-6524
 On May 26, 2013 5:58 PM, Bill! billsm...@hhs1963.org wrote:

 Chris,

 I know this was a reply to Edgar's post below, but I wasn't sure if it was
 in support or qualifying his post.

 I agree with you that the 'your' part of 'your mind' is the critical
 qualifier that signals illusion.  This is because it signals dualism.

 So yes, I do claim forms arise in the duality created by 'your mind'.  If
 'your mind' does not exist then duality does not exist; then there is only
 the One Mind, the Original Mind - Buddha Nature.

 ...Bill!

 --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Chris Austin-Lane chris@... wrote:
 
  Your mind.
 
  I think the illusory word there is your, moreso than mind.
 
  Thanks,
  --Chris
  301-270-6524
   On May 26, 2013 5:10 AM, Edgar Owen edgarowen@... wrote:
 
  
  
   Bill,
  
   NO!
  
   You claim that the forms arise in YOUR mind.
  
   But YOUR mind IS A FORM. Is one of the forms that arises.
  
   I've told you a hundred times that forms CANNOT arise in what does not
   exist!
  
   Forms arise - and only then are they categorized into the duality of
 mind
   and not mind.
  
   So you cannot say that forms arise in your mind because your mind does
 not
   yet exist when the forms arise.
  
   Therefore forms arise as experience - but NOT the experience of any
 mind.
  
   Therefor what exists and manifests cannot be said to either arise in
 mind
   OR external world, since these are both forms that arise.
  
   So the true and proper view is that pure experience is the fundamental
   reality, but this is just pure experience prior to the dualism of
   experiencer and experienced.
  
divTherefore your claim that forms arise in YOUR mind is dead
 wrong...
  
   At the most fundamental level forms just arise.
  
   What do they arise within? They arise within Buddha Nature for that is
 all
   that is possible for anything to arise within.
  
   Therefore the forms, as manifestations of Buddha Nature, are reality,
   because reality is the totality of all that exists.
  
  
   Hopefully this will get through to you someday. It's so clear and
 obvious.
  
   There are a couple of additional subtleties beyond this but I won't
   confuse you with them right now.
  
   Edgar
  
  
  
   On May 26, 2013, at 5:28 AM, Bill! wrote:
  
  
  
   Siska,
  
   No, unfortunately not.
  
   Edgar does this all the time. He says something that seems to agree
 with
   what I've stated but then slips in one word that corrupts what I have
   stated. In this case the word is 'forms'.
  
   Edgar believes forms (structure, rationality) exists independently of
 us
   and we perceive it with our intellect. I believe we create the
 structures
   and superimpose it upon our experiences to create our perceptions.
  
   The bottom line is I claim all thoughts are illusory and Edgar claims
 they
   are part of reality.
  
   We have other disagreements but I still think most of them are
 semantic,
   but in some cases they do indeed to be fundamental.
  
   Other than that all is well...Bill!
  
   --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:
   
Yeeaaay, Edgar and Bill are in total agreement, finally!
   
:-)
Siska
-Original Message-
From: Edgar Owen edgarowen@
Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 07:55:25
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Zen] Nice Quote
   
Bill,
   
Total agreement as stated.
   
Just incorporate what I said yesterday that these forms exist in
 reality
   instead of in your nutty head and you'll have the whole meaning..
   
Edgar
   
   
   
On May 25, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Bill! wrote:
   

 Siska,

 As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar opposite
   opinion on just about everything. In fact he'll probably disagree with
 this
   statement ;) and will certainly jump all over the rest of this post.

 Rumi's poem/metaphor was:

 I looked for my self,
 But my self was gone.
 The boundaries of my being
 Had disappeared in the sea.
 Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
 And a voice returned me to myself.
 It always happens like this.
 Sea turns on itself and foams,
 And with every foaming bit another body.
 Another being takes form.
 And when the sea sends word,
 Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
 - Rumi

 I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves
 form,
   come rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend themselves by
   slipping back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha Nature and later
   composing this poem. My interpretation of it is:

 I looked for my self,
 But my

Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-26 Thread Bill!
Chris,

You're starting to sound a little like Edgar now.  In your case assuming I've 
trying to do something I'm not trying to do - at least in the referenced post.

Don't ever think that any post of mine is ...purporting to be from the view 
point of the absolute  Virtually none are.  Most are from a dualistic, 
relative POV.  Some of my posts do attempt to describe  holistic experience 
(Buddha Nature) but always from a dualistic POV.  That's the whole challenge of 
the Zen Forum, and virtually all other communication modes as well but 
especially those based solely on language.

If I were to attempt to post something directly communicating holistic 
experience it would have to be in a poem, and even then would I'm sure fall way 
short.

The only way I know to directly communicate Buddha Nature is with a 
face-to-face encounter because the communication has to take the form of an 
experience, not an explanation.

Just a clarification and FYI...Bill!

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Chris Austin-Lane chris@... wrote:

 I find it amusing when email purporting to be from the view point of the
 absolute includes such watch phrases as Me or Mine or You or Yours. Mind is
 just mind, water is just water. But whose water?
 
 Thanks,
 --Chris
 301-270-6524
  On May 26, 2013 5:58 PM, Bill! BillSmart@... wrote:
 
  Chris,
 
  I know this was a reply to Edgar's post below, but I wasn't sure if it was
  in support or qualifying his post.
 
  I agree with you that the 'your' part of 'your mind' is the critical
  qualifier that signals illusion.  This is because it signals dualism.
 
  So yes, I do claim forms arise in the duality created by 'your mind'.  If
  'your mind' does not exist then duality does not exist; then there is only
  the One Mind, the Original Mind - Buddha Nature.
 
  ...Bill!
 
  --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Chris Austin-Lane chris@ wrote:
  
   Your mind.
  
   I think the illusory word there is your, moreso than mind.
  
   Thanks,
   --Chris
   301-270-6524
On May 26, 2013 5:10 AM, Edgar Owen edgarowen@ wrote:
  
   
   
Bill,
   
NO!
   
You claim that the forms arise in YOUR mind.
   
But YOUR mind IS A FORM. Is one of the forms that arises.
   
I've told you a hundred times that forms CANNOT arise in what does not
exist!
   
Forms arise - and only then are they categorized into the duality of
  mind
and not mind.
   
So you cannot say that forms arise in your mind because your mind does
  not
yet exist when the forms arise.
   
Therefore forms arise as experience - but NOT the experience of any
  mind.
   
Therefor what exists and manifests cannot be said to either arise in
  mind
OR external world, since these are both forms that arise.
   
So the true and proper view is that pure experience is the fundamental
reality, but this is just pure experience prior to the dualism of
experiencer and experienced.
   
 divTherefore your claim that forms arise in YOUR mind is dead
  wrong...
   
At the most fundamental level forms just arise.
   
What do they arise within? They arise within Buddha Nature for that is
  all
that is possible for anything to arise within.
   
Therefore the forms, as manifestations of Buddha Nature, are reality,
because reality is the totality of all that exists.
   
   
Hopefully this will get through to you someday. It's so clear and
  obvious.
   
There are a couple of additional subtleties beyond this but I won't
confuse you with them right now.
   
Edgar
   
   
   
On May 26, 2013, at 5:28 AM, Bill! wrote:
   
   
   
Siska,
   
No, unfortunately not.
   
Edgar does this all the time. He says something that seems to agree
  with
what I've stated but then slips in one word that corrupts what I have
stated. In this case the word is 'forms'.
   
Edgar believes forms (structure, rationality) exists independently of
  us
and we perceive it with our intellect. I believe we create the
  structures
and superimpose it upon our experiences to create our perceptions.
   
The bottom line is I claim all thoughts are illusory and Edgar claims
  they
are part of reality.
   
We have other disagreements but I still think most of them are
  semantic,
but in some cases they do indeed to be fundamental.
   
Other than that all is well...Bill!
   
--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:

 Yeeaaay, Edgar and Bill are in total agreement, finally!

 :-)
 Siska
 -Original Message-
 From: Edgar Owen edgarowen@
 Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 07:55:25
 To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

 Bill,

 Total agreement as stated.

 Just incorporate what I said yesterday that these forms exist in
  reality
instead of in your nutty head

Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-26 Thread Chris Austin-Lane
 and Bill are in total agreement, finally!
 
  :-)
  Siska
  -Original Message-
  From: Edgar Owen edgarowen@
  Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 07:55:25
  To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: Re: [Zen] Nice Quote
 
  Bill,
 
  Total agreement as stated.
 
  Just incorporate what I said yesterday that these forms exist in
   reality
 instead of in your nutty head and you'll have the whole meaning..
 
  Edgar
 
 
 
  On May 25, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Bill! wrote:
 
  
   Siska,
  
   As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar
 opposite
 opinion on just about everything. In fact he'll probably disagree
 with
   this
 statement ;) and will certainly jump all over the rest of this
 post.
  
   Rumi's poem/metaphor was:
  
   I looked for my self,
   But my self was gone.
   The boundaries of my being
   Had disappeared in the sea.
   Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
   And a voice returned me to myself.
   It always happens like this.
   Sea turns on itself and foams,
   And with every foaming bit another body.
   Another being takes form.
   And when the sea sends word,
   Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
   - Rumi
  
   I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the
 waves
   form,
 come rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend
 themselves by
 slipping back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha Nature and
 later
 composing this poem. My interpretation of it is:
  
   I looked for my self,
   But my self was gone.
   The boundaries of my being
   Had disappeared in the sea.
  
   Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature.
 The
 illusion of dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as
   something
 independent and apart from everything else has vanished with it.
 It has
 vanished into sea which is a metaphor for emptiness.
  
   Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
   And a voice returned me to myself.
   It always happens like this.
  
   Dualism returns. His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has
 been
 interrupted and his illusion of self has returned. This alternation
   between
 holism and dualism, between emptiness and self happens regularly,
 much
   like
 the waves surging rhythmically upon the beach.
  
   Sea turns on itself and foams,
   And with every foaming bit another body.
   Another being takes form.
  
   Now that he is abiding in dualism all other illusions,
 perceptions,
 thoughts, etc..., of all other (10,000) things appear.
  
   And when the sea sends word,
   Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
  
   But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions
 melt
 back into emptiness.
  
   That's my reading of this anyway. It will be interesting to see
   what
 Edgar comes up with although I think I could almost write it for
 him...
  
   ...Bill!
  
   --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:
   
Hi Bill,
   
I followed until: Waves broke.
   
The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.
   
Siska
-Original Message-
From: Bill! BillSmart@
Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote
   
   
..Bill!
   
  
  
 





   
  
  
  
  
   
  
   Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or
 are
   reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
  
 



 

 Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are
 reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links






Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-25 Thread siska_cen
Hi Bill,

I followed until: Waves broke.

The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.

Siska
-Original Message-
From: Bill! billsm...@hhs1963.org
Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29 
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote


..Bill!



Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-25 Thread Bill!
Siska,
As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar opposite
opinion on just about everything.  In fact he'll probably disagree with
this statement ;) and will certainly jump all over the rest of this
post.
Rumi's poem/metaphor was:
I looked for my self,But my self was gone.The boundaries of my beingHad
disappeared in the sea.Waves broke.  Awareness rose again.And a voice
returned me to myself.It always happens like this.Sea turns on itself
and foams,And with every foaming bit another body.Another being takes
form.And when the sea sends word,Each foaming body melts back to
ocean-breath.- Rumi
I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves form,
come rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend themselves by
slipping back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha Nature and later
composing this poem.  My interpretation of it is:
I looked for my self,But my self was gone.The boundaries of my beingHad
disappeared in the sea.
Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature.  The
illusion of dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as something
independent and apart from everything else has vanished with it.  It has
vanished into sea which is a metaphor for emptiness.
Waves broke.  Awareness rose again.And a voice returned me to myself.It
always happens like this.
Dualism returns.  His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has been
interrupted and his illusion of self has returned.  This alternation
between holism and dualism, between emptiness and self happens
regularly, much like the waves surging rhythmically upon the beach.
Sea turns on itself and foams,And with every foaming bit another
body.Another being takes form.
Now that he is abiding in dualism all other illusions, perceptions,
thoughts, etc..., of all other (10,000) things appear.
And when the sea sends word,Each foaming body melts back to
ocean-breath.
But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions melt back
into emptiness.
That's my reading of this anyway.  It will be interesting to see what
Edgar comes up with although I think I could almost write it for him...
...Bill!
--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@... wrote:

 Hi Bill,

 I followed until: Waves broke.

 The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.

 Siska
 -Original Message-
 From: Bill! BillSmart@...
 Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29
 To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote


 ..Bill!




Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-25 Thread Merle Lester


 yes i have often watch the waves... great poem.,...cloud formations are 
another wonder...merle


  
Siska,

As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar opposite opinion on 
just about everything.  In fact he'll probably disagree with this statement ;) 
and will certainly jump all over the rest of this post.

Rumi's poem/metaphor was:

I looked for my self,
But my self was gone.
The boundaries of my being
Had disappeared in the sea.
Waves broke.  Awareness rose again.
And a voice returned me to myself.
It always happens like this.
Sea turns on itself and foams,
And with every foaming bit another body.
Another being takes form.
And when the sea sends word,
Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
- Rumi

I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves form, come 
rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend themselves by slipping 
back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha Nature and later composing this 
poem.  My interpretation of it is:

I looked for my self,
But my self was gone.
The boundaries of my being
Had disappeared in the sea.

Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature.  The illusion of 
dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as something independent and 
apart from everything else has vanished with it.  It has vanished into sea 
which is a metaphor for emptiness.

Waves broke.  Awareness rose again.
And a voice returned me to myself.
It always happens like this.

Dualism returns.  His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has been interrupted 
and his illusion of self has returned.  This alternation between holism and 
dualism, between emptiness and self happens regularly, much like the waves 
surging rhythmically upon the beach. 

Sea turns on itself and foams,
And with every foaming bit another body.
Another being takes form.

Now that he is abiding in dualism all otherillusions, perceptions, thoughts, 
etc..., of all other (10,000) things appear.

And when the sea sends word,
Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.

But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions melt back into 
emptiness.

That's my reading of this anyway.  It will be interesting to see what Edgar 
comes up with although I think I could almost write it for him...

...Bill!
--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@... wrote:

 Hi Bill,
 
 I followed until: Waves broke.
 
 The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.
 
 Siska
 -Original Message-
 From: Bill! BillSmart@...
 Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29 
 To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote
 
 
 ..Bill!


 

Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-25 Thread Merle Lester


 edgar's pole is somewhere in the land of reason..far far away...  merle


  
Siska,

As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar opposite opinion on 
just about everything.  In fact he'll probably disagree with this statement ;) 
and will certainly jump all over the rest of this post.

Rumi's poem/metaphor was:

I looked for my self,
But my self was gone.
The boundaries of my being
Had disappeared in the sea.
Waves broke.  Awareness rose again.
And a voice returned me to myself.
It always happens like this.
Sea turns on itself and foams,
And with every foaming bit another body.
Another being takes form.
And when the sea sends word,
Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
- Rumi

I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves form, come 
rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend themselves by slipping 
back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha Nature and later composing this 
poem.  My interpretation of it is:

I looked for my self,
But my self was gone.
The boundaries of my being
Had disappeared in the sea.

Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature.  The illusion of 
dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as something independent and 
apart from everything else has vanished with it.  It has vanished into sea 
which is a metaphor for emptiness.

Waves broke.  Awareness rose again.
And a voice returned me to myself.
It always happens like this.

Dualism returns.  His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has been interrupted 
and his illusion of self has returned.  This alternation between holism and 
dualism, between emptiness and self happens regularly, much like the waves 
surging rhythmically upon the beach. 

Sea turns on itself and foams,
And with every foaming bit another body.
Another being takes form.

Now that he is abiding in dualism all otherillusions, perceptions, thoughts, 
etc..., of all other (10,000) things appear.

And when the sea sends word,
Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.

But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions melt back into 
emptiness.

That's my reading of this anyway.  It will be interesting to see what Edgar 
comes up with although I think I could almost write it for him...

...Bill!
--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@... wrote:

 Hi Bill,
 
 I followed until: Waves broke.
 
 The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.
 
 Siska
 -Original Message-
 From: Bill! BillSmart@...
 Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29 
 To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote
 
 
 ..Bill!


 

Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-25 Thread Bill!
Siska,

Yes - waves, cloud formations, staring into a fire - anything chaotic, that is 
not rational.  It allows your mind to disengage from trying to 'make sense' out 
of the changing forms and can enable you to slip into the experience of Buddha 
Nature.

This is the very same technique as koans.

...Bill!

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Merle Lester merlewiitpom@... wrote:

 
 
  yes i have often watch the waves... great poem.,...cloud formations are 
 another wonder...merle
 
 
   
 Siska,
 
 As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar opposite opinion on 
 just about everything.  In fact he'll probably disagree with this statement 
 ;) and will certainly jump all over the rest of this post.
 
 Rumi's poem/metaphor was:
 
 I looked for my self,
 But my self was gone.
 The boundaries of my being
 Had disappeared in the sea.
 Waves broke.  Awareness rose again.
 And a voice returned me to myself.
 It always happens like this.
 Sea turns on itself and foams,
 And with every foaming bit another body.
 Another being takes form.
 And when the sea sends word,
 Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
 - Rumi
 
 I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves form, come 
 rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend themselves by slipping 
 back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha Nature and later composing this 
 poem.  My interpretation of it is:
 
 I looked for my self,
 But my self was gone.
 The boundaries of my being
 Had disappeared in the sea.
 
 Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature.  The illusion 
 of dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as something independent 
 and apart from everything else has vanished with it.  It has vanished into 
 sea which is a metaphor for emptiness.
 
 Waves broke.  Awareness rose again.
 And a voice returned me to myself.
 It always happens like this.
 
 Dualism returns.  His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has been 
 interrupted and his illusion of self has returned.  This alternation between 
 holism and dualism, between emptiness and self happens regularly, much like 
 the waves surging rhythmically upon the beach. 
 
 Sea turns on itself and foams,
 And with every foaming bit another body.
 Another being takes form.
 
 Now that he is abiding in dualism all otherillusions, perceptions, thoughts, 
 etc..., of all other (10,000) things appear.
 
 And when the sea sends word,
 Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
 
 But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions melt back into 
 emptiness.
 
 That's my reading of this anyway.  It will be interesting to see what Edgar 
 comes up with although I think I could almost write it for him...
 
 ...Bill!
 --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:
 
  Hi Bill,
  
  I followed until: Waves broke.
  
  The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.
  
  Siska
  -Original Message-
  From: Bill! BillSmart@
  Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29 
  To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote
  
  
  ..Bill!
 







Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-25 Thread Bill!
*** Re-Posting for Correction ***

Merle,

Yes - waves, cloud formations, staring into a fire - anything chaotic, that is
not rational. It allows your mind to disengage from trying to 'make sense' out
of the changing forms and can enable you to slip into the experience of Buddha
Nature.

This is the very same technique as koans.

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Merle Lester merlewiitpom@... wrote:

 
 
  yes i have often watch the waves... great poem.,...cloud formations are 
 another wonder...merle
 
 
   
 Siska,
 
 As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar opposite opinion on 
 just about everything.  In fact he'll probably disagree with this statement 
 ;) and will certainly jump all over the rest of this post.
 
 Rumi's poem/metaphor was:
 
 I looked for my self,
 But my self was gone.
 The boundaries of my being
 Had disappeared in the sea.
 Waves broke.  Awareness rose again.
 And a voice returned me to myself.
 It always happens like this.
 Sea turns on itself and foams,
 And with every foaming bit another body.
 Another being takes form.
 And when the sea sends word,
 Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
 - Rumi
 
 I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves form, come 
 rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend themselves by slipping 
 back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha Nature and later composing this 
 poem.  My interpretation of it is:
 
 I looked for my self,
 But my self was gone.
 The boundaries of my being
 Had disappeared in the sea.
 
 Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature.  The illusion 
 of dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as something independent 
 and apart from everything else has vanished with it.  It has vanished into 
 sea which is a metaphor for emptiness.
 
 Waves broke.  Awareness rose again.
 And a voice returned me to myself.
 It always happens like this.
 
 Dualism returns.  His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has been 
 interrupted and his illusion of self has returned.  This alternation between 
 holism and dualism, between emptiness and self happens regularly, much like 
 the waves surging rhythmically upon the beach. 
 
 Sea turns on itself and foams,
 And with every foaming bit another body.
 Another being takes form.
 
 Now that he is abiding in dualism all otherillusions, perceptions, thoughts, 
 etc..., of all other (10,000) things appear.
 
 And when the sea sends word,
 Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
 
 But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions melt back into 
 emptiness.
 
 That's my reading of this anyway.  It will be interesting to see what Edgar 
 comes up with although I think I could almost write it for him...
 
 ...Bill!
 --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:
 
  Hi Bill,
  
  I followed until: Waves broke.
  
  The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.
  
  Siska
  -Original Message-
  From: Bill! BillSmart@
  Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29 
  To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote
  
  
  ..Bill!
 






Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-25 Thread Merle Lester


 attention bill..note it's merle who said waves..etc..merle


  
Siska,

Yes - waves, cloud formations, staring into a fire - anything chaotic, that is 
not rational.  It allows your mind to disengage from trying to 'make sense' out 
of the changing forms and can enable you to slip into the experience of Buddha 
Nature.

This is the very same technique as koans.

...Bill!

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Merle Lester merlewiitpom@... wrote:

 
 
  yes i have often watch the waves... great poem.,...cloud formations are 
 another wonder...merle
 
 
   
 Siska,
 
 As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar opposite opinion on 
 just about everything.  In fact he'll probably disagree with this statement 
 ;) and will certainly jump all over the rest of this post.
 
 Rumi's poem/metaphor was:
 
 I looked for my self,
 But my self was gone.
 The boundaries of my being
 Had disappeared in the sea.
 Waves broke.  Awareness rose again.
 And a voice returned me to myself.
 It always happens like this.
 Sea turns on itself and foams,
 And with every foaming bit another body.
 Another being takes form.
 And when the sea sends word,
 Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
 - Rumi
 
 I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves form, come 
 rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend themselves by slipping 
 back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha Nature and later composing this 
 poem.  My interpretation of it is:
 
 I looked for my self,
 But my self was gone.
 The boundaries of my being
 Had disappeared in the sea.
 
 Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature.  The illusion 
 of dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as something independent 
 and apart from everything else has vanished with it.  It has vanished into 
 sea which is a metaphor for emptiness.
 
 Waves broke.  Awareness rose again.
 And a voice returned me to myself.
 It always happens like this.
 
 Dualism returns.  His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has been 
 interrupted and his illusion of self has returned.  This alternation between 
 holism and dualism, between emptiness and self happens regularly, much like 
 the waves surging rhythmically upon the beach. 
 
 Sea turns on itself and foams,
 And with every foaming bit another body.
 Another being takes form.
 
 Now that he is abiding in dualism all otherillusions, perceptions, thoughts, 
 etc..., of all other (10,000) things appear.
 
 And when the sea sends word,
 Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
 
 But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions melt back into 
 emptiness.
 
 That's my reading of this anyway.  It will be interesting to see what Edgar 
 comes up with although I think I could almost write it for him...
 
 ...Bill!
 --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:
 
  Hi Bill,
  
  I followed until: Waves broke.
  
  The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.
  
  Siska
  -Original Message-
  From: Bill! BillSmart@
  Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29 
  To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote
  
  
  ..Bill!
 



 

Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-25 Thread uerusuboyo
Merle,br/br/I think Bill! was referring to Siska's post where she said she 
followed the poem up to where the waves broke. Bill! seems to have replied to 
Siska using your post so it's an understandable 
mistake.br/br/Mikebr/br/Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad

Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-25 Thread Bill!
Edgar,

As long as you agree dualism is an illusion you can call it 'reality' if you 
wish.  I don't agree, but we can let others decide for themselves if illusions 
are real or not.

...Bill!

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen edgarowen@... wrote:

 Bill,
 
 Total agreement as stated.
 
 Just incorporate what I said yesterday that these forms exist in reality 
 instead of in your nutty head and you'll have the whole meaning..
 
 Edgar
 
 
 
 On May 25, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Bill! wrote:
 
  
  Siska,
  
  As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar opposite opinion 
  on just about everything.  In fact he'll probably disagree with this 
  statement ;) and will certainly jump all over the rest of this post.
  
  Rumi's poem/metaphor was:
  
  I looked for my self,
  But my self was gone.
  The boundaries of my being
  Had disappeared in the sea.
  Waves broke.  Awareness rose again.
  And a voice returned me to myself.
  It always happens like this.
  Sea turns on itself and foams,
  And with every foaming bit another body.
  Another being takes form.
  And when the sea sends word,
  Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
  - Rumi
  
  I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves form, come 
  rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend themselves by slipping 
  back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha Nature and later composing 
  this poem.  My interpretation of it is:
  
  I looked for my self,
  But my self was gone.
  The boundaries of my being
  Had disappeared in the sea.
  
  Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature.  The illusion 
  of dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as something independent 
  and apart from everything else has vanished with it.  It has vanished into 
  sea which is a metaphor for emptiness.
  
  Waves broke.  Awareness rose again.
  And a voice returned me to myself.
  It always happens like this.
  
  Dualism returns.  His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has been 
  interrupted and his illusion of self has returned.  This alternation 
  between holism and dualism, between emptiness and self happens regularly, 
  much like the waves surging rhythmically upon the beach. 
  
  Sea turns on itself and foams,
  And with every foaming bit another body.
  Another being takes form.
  
  Now that he is abiding in dualism all other illusions, perceptions, 
  thoughts, etc..., of all other (10,000) things appear.
  
  And when the sea sends word,
  Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
  
  But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions melt back 
  into emptiness.
  
  That's my reading of this anyway.  It will be interesting to see what Edgar 
  comes up with although I think I could almost write it for him...
  
  ...Bill!
  
  --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:
  
   Hi Bill,
   
   I followed until: Waves broke.
   
   The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.
   
   Siska
   -Original Message-
   From: Bill! BillSmart@
   Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
   Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29 
   To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
   Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
   Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote
   
   
   ..Bill!
  
  
 







Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-25 Thread Edgar Owen
Bill,

People don't decide whether illusions are real or not. Reality does! Get that 
through your solipsistic head!

Edgar



On May 25, 2013, at 9:11 AM, Bill! wrote:

 Edgar,
 
 As long as you agree dualism is an illusion you can call it 'reality' if you 
 wish. I don't agree, but we can let others decide for themselves if illusions 
 are real or not.
 
 ...Bill!
 
 --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen edgarowen@... wrote:
 
  Bill,
  
  Total agreement as stated.
  
  Just incorporate what I said yesterday that these forms exist in reality 
  instead of in your nutty head and you'll have the whole meaning..
  
  Edgar
  
  
  
  On May 25, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Bill! wrote:
  
   
   Siska,
   
   As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar opposite 
   opinion on just about everything. In fact he'll probably disagree with 
   this statement ;) and will certainly jump all over the rest of this post.
   
   Rumi's poem/metaphor was:
   
   I looked for my self,
   But my self was gone.
   The boundaries of my being
   Had disappeared in the sea.
   Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
   And a voice returned me to myself.
   It always happens like this.
   Sea turns on itself and foams,
   And with every foaming bit another body.
   Another being takes form.
   And when the sea sends word,
   Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
   - Rumi
   
   I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves form, 
   come rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend themselves by 
   slipping back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha Nature and later 
   composing this poem. My interpretation of it is:
   
   I looked for my self,
   But my self was gone.
   The boundaries of my being
   Had disappeared in the sea.
   
   Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature. The illusion 
   of dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as something 
   independent and apart from everything else has vanished with it. It has 
   vanished into sea which is a metaphor for emptiness.
   
   Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
   And a voice returned me to myself.
   It always happens like this.
   
   Dualism returns. His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has been 
   interrupted and his illusion of self has returned. This alternation 
   between holism and dualism, between emptiness and self happens regularly, 
   much like the waves surging rhythmically upon the beach. 
   
   Sea turns on itself and foams,
   And with every foaming bit another body.
   Another being takes form.
   
   Now that he is abiding in dualism all other illusions, perceptions, 
   thoughts, etc..., of all other (10,000) things appear.
   
   And when the sea sends word,
   Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
   
   But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions melt back 
   into emptiness.
   
   That's my reading of this anyway. It will be interesting to see what 
   Edgar comes up with although I think I could almost write it for him...
   
   ...Bill!
   
   --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:
   
Hi Bill,

I followed until: Waves broke.

The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.

Siska
-Original Message-
From: Bill! BillSmart@
Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29 
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote


..Bill!
   
   
  
 
 
 



Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-25 Thread Bill!
Edgar,

People create illusions so why can't people decide on whether they're real or 
not?

I say they're not.

...Bill!

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen edgarowen@... wrote:

 Bill,
 
 People don't decide whether illusions are real or not. Reality does! Get that 
 through your solipsistic head!
 
 Edgar
 
 
 
 On May 25, 2013, at 9:11 AM, Bill! wrote:
 
  Edgar,
  
  As long as you agree dualism is an illusion you can call it 'reality' if 
  you wish. I don't agree, but we can let others decide for themselves if 
  illusions are real or not.
  
  ...Bill!
  
  --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen edgarowen@ wrote:
  
   Bill,
   
   Total agreement as stated.
   
   Just incorporate what I said yesterday that these forms exist in reality 
   instead of in your nutty head and you'll have the whole meaning..
   
   Edgar
   
   
   
   On May 25, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Bill! wrote:
   

Siska,

As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar opposite 
opinion on just about everything. In fact he'll probably disagree with 
this statement ;) and will certainly jump all over the rest of this 
post.

Rumi's poem/metaphor was:

I looked for my self,
But my self was gone.
The boundaries of my being
Had disappeared in the sea.
Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
And a voice returned me to myself.
It always happens like this.
Sea turns on itself and foams,
And with every foaming bit another body.
Another being takes form.
And when the sea sends word,
Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
- Rumi

I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves form, 
come rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend themselves by 
slipping back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha Nature and later 
composing this poem. My interpretation of it is:

I looked for my self,
But my self was gone.
The boundaries of my being
Had disappeared in the sea.

Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature. The 
illusion of dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as 
something independent and apart from everything else has vanished with 
it. It has vanished into sea which is a metaphor for emptiness.

Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
And a voice returned me to myself.
It always happens like this.

Dualism returns. His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has been 
interrupted and his illusion of self has returned. This alternation 
between holism and dualism, between emptiness and self happens 
regularly, much like the waves surging rhythmically upon the beach. 

Sea turns on itself and foams,
And with every foaming bit another body.
Another being takes form.

Now that he is abiding in dualism all other illusions, perceptions, 
thoughts, etc..., of all other (10,000) things appear.

And when the sea sends word,
Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.

But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions melt 
back into emptiness.

That's my reading of this anyway. It will be interesting to see what 
Edgar comes up with although I think I could almost write it for him...

...Bill!

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:

 Hi Bill,
 
 I followed until: Waves broke.
 
 The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.
 
 Siska
 -Original Message-
 From: Bill! BillSmart@
 Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29 
 To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote
 
 
 ..Bill!


   
  
  
 







Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-25 Thread Chris Austin-Lane
I say the thoughts have actual reality and a limited illusory implicit
world view they carry with them.

I don't find much reason to distinguish the neuronal firings of hearing a
frog jumping into the water and the neuronal firings of remembering a frog
jumping into water. But to take a thought seriously, haha, that way leads
to madness.

The fact of maths being so effective in science is still in my mind part of
the mystery, and some little model of computation cribbed from recent
popular science fails to address it.

I also am pretty sure one may put pants on without having an effective
reasonable model of computation externalized.  One may just put the pants
on.

Thanks,
--Chris
301-270-6524
 On May 25, 2013 7:10 AM, Bill! billsm...@hhs1963.org wrote:

 Edgar,

 People create illusions so why can't people decide on whether they're real
 or not?

 I say they're not.

 ...Bill!

 --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen edgarowen@... wrote:
 
  Bill,
 
  People don't decide whether illusions are real or not. Reality does! Get
 that through your solipsistic head!
 
  Edgar
 
 
 
  On May 25, 2013, at 9:11 AM, Bill! wrote:
 
   Edgar,
  
   As long as you agree dualism is an illusion you can call it 'reality'
 if you wish. I don't agree, but we can let others decide for themselves if
 illusions are real or not.
  
   ...Bill!
  
   --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen edgarowen@ wrote:
   
Bill,
   
Total agreement as stated.
   
Just incorporate what I said yesterday that these forms exist in
 reality instead of in your nutty head and you'll have the whole meaning..
   
Edgar
   
   
   
On May 25, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Bill! wrote:
   

 Siska,

 As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar opposite
 opinion on just about everything. In fact he'll probably disagree with this
 statement ;) and will certainly jump all over the rest of this post.

 Rumi's poem/metaphor was:

 I looked for my self,
 But my self was gone.
 The boundaries of my being
 Had disappeared in the sea.
 Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
 And a voice returned me to myself.
 It always happens like this.
 Sea turns on itself and foams,
 And with every foaming bit another body.
 Another being takes form.
 And when the sea sends word,
 Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
 - Rumi

 I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves
 form, come rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend themselves
 by slipping back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha Nature and later
 composing this poem. My interpretation of it is:

 I looked for my self,
 But my self was gone.
 The boundaries of my being
 Had disappeared in the sea.

 Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature. The
 illusion of dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as something
 independent and apart from everything else has vanished with it. It has
 vanished into sea which is a metaphor for emptiness.

 Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
 And a voice returned me to myself.
 It always happens like this.

 Dualism returns. His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has been
 interrupted and his illusion of self has returned. This alternation between
 holism and dualism, between emptiness and self happens regularly, much like
 the waves surging rhythmically upon the beach.

 Sea turns on itself and foams,
 And with every foaming bit another body.
 Another being takes form.

 Now that he is abiding in dualism all other illusions,
 perceptions, thoughts, etc..., of all other (10,000) things appear.

 And when the sea sends word,
 Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.

 But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions
 melt back into emptiness.

 That's my reading of this anyway. It will be interesting to see
 what Edgar comes up with although I think I could almost write it for him...

 ...Bill!

 --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:
 
  Hi Bill,
 
  I followed until: Waves broke.
 
  The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.
 
  Siska
  -Original Message-
  From: Bill! BillSmart@
  Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29
  To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote
 
 
  ..Bill!
 


   
  
  
 




 

 Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are
 reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links






Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-25 Thread Edgar Owen
Chris,

Yes, if you manage to put your pants on in the morning you ARE using your 
rational mind.

Bill obviously walks around without pants all day hoping to preserve his Zen...

Edgar



On May 25, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Chris Austin-Lane wrote:

 
 I say the thoughts have actual reality and a limited illusory implicit world 
 view they carry with them. 
 
 I don't find much reason to distinguish the neuronal firings of hearing a 
 frog jumping into the water and the neuronal firings of remembering a frog 
 jumping into water. But to take a thought seriously, haha, that way leads to 
 madness.
 
 The fact of maths being so effective in science is still in my mind part of 
 the mystery, and some little model of computation cribbed from recent popular 
 science fails to address it. 
 
 I also am pretty sure one may put pants on without having an effective 
 reasonable model of computation externalized.  One may just put the pants on. 
 
 Thanks,
 --Chris
 301-270-6524
 On May 25, 2013 7:10 AM, Bill! billsm...@hhs1963.org wrote:
 Edgar,
 
 People create illusions so why can't people decide on whether they're real or 
 not?
 
 I say they're not.
 
 ...Bill!
 
 --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen edgarowen@... wrote:
 
  Bill,
 
  People don't decide whether illusions are real or not. Reality does! Get 
  that through your solipsistic head!
 
  Edgar
 
 
 
  On May 25, 2013, at 9:11 AM, Bill! wrote:
 
   Edgar,
  
   As long as you agree dualism is an illusion you can call it 'reality' if 
   you wish. I don't agree, but we can let others decide for themselves if 
   illusions are real or not.
  
   ...Bill!
  
   --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen edgarowen@ wrote:
   
Bill,
   
Total agreement as stated.
   
Just incorporate what I said yesterday that these forms exist in 
reality instead of in your nutty head and you'll have the whole 
meaning..
   
Edgar
   
   
   
On May 25, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Bill! wrote:
   

 Siska,

 As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar opposite 
 opinion on just about everything. In fact he'll probably disagree 
 with this statement ;) and will certainly jump all over the rest of 
 this post.

 Rumi's poem/metaphor was:

 I looked for my self,
 But my self was gone.
 The boundaries of my being
 Had disappeared in the sea.
 Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
 And a voice returned me to myself.
 It always happens like this.
 Sea turns on itself and foams,
 And with every foaming bit another body.
 Another being takes form.
 And when the sea sends word,
 Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
 - Rumi

 I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves 
 form, come rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend 
 themselves by slipping back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha 
 Nature and later composing this poem. My interpretation of it is:

 I looked for my self,
 But my self was gone.
 The boundaries of my being
 Had disappeared in the sea.

 Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature. The 
 illusion of dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as 
 something independent and apart from everything else has vanished 
 with it. It has vanished into sea which is a metaphor for emptiness.

 Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
 And a voice returned me to myself.
 It always happens like this.

 Dualism returns. His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has been 
 interrupted and his illusion of self has returned. This alternation 
 between holism and dualism, between emptiness and self happens 
 regularly, much like the waves surging rhythmically upon the beach.

 Sea turns on itself and foams,
 And with every foaming bit another body.
 Another being takes form.

 Now that he is abiding in dualism all other illusions, perceptions, 
 thoughts, etc..., of all other (10,000) things appear.

 And when the sea sends word,
 Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.

 But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions melt 
 back into emptiness.

 That's my reading of this anyway. It will be interesting to see what 
 Edgar comes up with although I think I could almost write it for 
 him...

 ...Bill!

 --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:
 
  Hi Bill,
 
  I followed until: Waves broke.
 
  The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.
 
  Siska
  -Original Message-
  From: Bill! BillSmart@
  Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29
  To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote
 
 
  ..Bill

Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-25 Thread Chris Austin-Lane
 appear.

 And when the sea sends word,
 Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.

 But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions
 melt back into emptiness.

 That's my reading of this anyway. It will be interesting to see
 what Edgar comes up with although I think I could almost write it for him...

 ...Bill!

 --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:
 
  Hi Bill,
 
  I followed until: Waves broke.
 
  The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.
 
  Siska
  -Original Message-
  From: Bill! BillSmart@
  Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29
  To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote
 
 
  ..Bill!
 


   
  
  
 




 

 Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are
 reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links







 


Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-25 Thread Edgar Owen
 has returned. This alternation 
 between holism and dualism, between emptiness and self happens 
 regularly, much like the waves surging rhythmically upon the beach.

 Sea turns on itself and foams,
 And with every foaming bit another body.
 Another being takes form.

 Now that he is abiding in dualism all other illusions, perceptions, 
 thoughts, etc..., of all other (10,000) things appear.

 And when the sea sends word,
 Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.

 But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions melt 
 back into emptiness.

 That's my reading of this anyway. It will be interesting to see what 
 Edgar comes up with although I think I could almost write it for 
 him...

 ...Bill!

 --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:
 
  Hi Bill,
 
  I followed until: Waves broke.
 
  The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.
 
  Siska
  -Original Message-
  From: Bill! BillSmart@
  Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29
  To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote
 
 
  ..Bill!
 


   
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
 reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-25 Thread Chris Austin-Lane
' as something
 independent and apart from everything else has vanished with it. It has
 vanished into sea which is a metaphor for emptiness.

 Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
 And a voice returned me to myself.
 It always happens like this.

 Dualism returns. His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has
 been interrupted and his illusion of self has returned. This alternation
 between holism and dualism, between emptiness and self happens regularly,
 much like the waves surging rhythmically upon the beach.

 Sea turns on itself and foams,
 And with every foaming bit another body.
 Another being takes form.

 Now that he is abiding in dualism all other illusions,
 perceptions, thoughts, etc..., of all other (10,000) things appear.

 And when the sea sends word,
 Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.

 But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions
 melt back into emptiness.

 That's my reading of this anyway. It will be interesting to see
 what Edgar comes up with although I think I could almost write it for him...

 ...Bill!

 --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:
 
  Hi Bill,
 
  I followed until: Waves broke.
 
  The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.
 
  Siska
  -Original Message-
  From: Bill! BillSmart@
  Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29
  To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote
 
 
  ..Bill!
 


   
  
  
 




 

 Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are
 reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links











 


Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-25 Thread Chris Austin-Lane
 confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.
 
  Siska
  -Original Message-
  From: Bill! BillSmart@
  Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29
  To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote
 
 
  ..Bill!
 


   
  
  
 




 

 Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are
 reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links







 


Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-25 Thread Chris Austin-Lane
' as something
 independent and apart from everything else has vanished with it. It has
 vanished into sea which is a metaphor for emptiness.

 Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
 And a voice returned me to myself.
 It always happens like this.

 Dualism returns. His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has
 been interrupted and his illusion of self has returned. This alternation
 between holism and dualism, between emptiness and self happens regularly,
 much like the waves surging rhythmically upon the beach.

 Sea turns on itself and foams,
 And with every foaming bit another body.
 Another being takes form.

 Now that he is abiding in dualism all other illusions,
 perceptions, thoughts, etc..., of all other (10,000) things appear.

 And when the sea sends word,
 Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.

 But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions
 melt back into emptiness.

 That's my reading of this anyway. It will be interesting to see
 what Edgar comes up with although I think I could almost write it for him...

 ...Bill!

 --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:
 
  Hi Bill,
 
  I followed until: Waves broke.
 
  The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.
 
  Siska
  -Original Message-
  From: Bill! BillSmart@
  Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29
  To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote
 
 
  ..Bill!
 


   
  
  
 




 

 Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are
 reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links







 




Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-25 Thread Edgar Owen
 yesterday that these forms exist in 
reality instead of in your nutty head and you'll have the whole 
meaning..
   
Edgar
   
   
   
On May 25, 2013, at 3:41 AM, Bill! wrote:
   

 Siska,

 As you'll soon find out Edgar and I have almost the polar opposite 
 opinion on just about everything. In fact he'll probably disagree 
 with this statement ;) and will certainly jump all over the rest 
 of this post.

 Rumi's poem/metaphor was:

 I looked for my self,
 But my self was gone.
 The boundaries of my being
 Had disappeared in the sea.
 Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
 And a voice returned me to myself.
 It always happens like this.
 Sea turns on itself and foams,
 And with every foaming bit another body.
 Another being takes form.
 And when the sea sends word,
 Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.
 - Rumi

 I can just imagine Rumi standing on the beach watching the waves 
 form, come rhythmically in, crash upon the beach and then spend 
 themselves by slipping back into the sea - losing himself in Buddha 
 Nature and later composing this poem. My interpretation of it is:

 I looked for my self,
 But my self was gone.
 The boundaries of my being
 Had disappeared in the sea.

 Rumi is describing the holistic experience of Buddha Nature. The 
 illusion of dualism has vanished and his illusion of 'self' as 
 something independent and apart from everything else has vanished 
 with it. It has vanished into sea which is a metaphor for emptiness.

 Waves broke. Awareness rose again.
 And a voice returned me to myself.
 It always happens like this.

 Dualism returns. His holistic experience of Buddha Nature has been 
 interrupted and his illusion of self has returned. This alternation 
 between holism and dualism, between emptiness and self happens 
 regularly, much like the waves surging rhythmically upon the beach.

 Sea turns on itself and foams,
 And with every foaming bit another body.
 Another being takes form.

 Now that he is abiding in dualism all other illusions, perceptions, 
 thoughts, etc..., of all other (10,000) things appear.

 And when the sea sends word,
 Each foaming body melts back to ocean-breath.

 But when he returns again to Buddha Nature all these illusions melt 
 back into emptiness.

 That's my reading of this anyway. It will be interesting to see 
 what Edgar comes up with although I think I could almost write it 
 for him...

 ...Bill!

 --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, siska_cen@ wrote:
 
  Hi Bill,
 
  I followed until: Waves broke.
 
  The rest is a bit confusing. It's as if the 'self' is back.
 
  Siska
  -Original Message-
  From: Bill! BillSmart@
  Sender: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:29
  To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Reply-To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [Zen] Nice Quote
 
 
  ..Bill!
 


   
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
 reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



[Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-24 Thread Bill!

...Bill!


Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-24 Thread Edgar Owen
Bill,

Yes, nice quote IF you understand it correctly. The correct understanding is 
this is how the world of forms evolves and manifests in the sea of Buddha 
Nature.

Edgar



On May 24, 2013, at 6:04 AM, Bill! wrote:

 
 
 ...Bill!
 
 



Re: [Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-24 Thread Bill!
Edgar,

So...does your statement below mean if you don't understand it correctly it's 
not a nice quote?  The sea foam is a metaphor for illusion.  It's something 
that has been churned up, appearing for a short time to be something separate 
from the sea, a dualistic set of sea:foam.  I think you've ignored the last 
line:

And when the sea sends word each foaming body [illusion] melts back to 
ocean-breath.

...Bill!

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Edgar Owen edgarowen@... wrote:

 Bill,
 
 Yes, nice quote IF you understand it correctly. The correct understanding is 
 this is how the world of forms evolves and manifests in the sea of Buddha 
 Nature.
 
 Edgar
 
 
 
 On May 24, 2013, at 6:04 AM, Bill! wrote:
 
  
  
  ...Bill!
  
 







Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



[Zen] Nice Quote

2013-05-14 Thread Bill!
When you put it all down, you can believe in your true self one hundred 
percent.

Then your mind is clear like space, which is clear like a mirror: red comes, 
red; white comes, white. Someone is hungry, give them food. Someone is thirsty, 
give them a drink. Everything is reflected in this clear mirror.

Then you can see, hear, smell, taste, touch, and think clearly. The sky is 
blue, the tree is green; salt is salty, sugar is sweet. A dog is barking, 
Woof! Woof! Just like this, everything is the truth. 

So you are also truth.

- Zen Master Seung Sahn





Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



[Zen] Nice Quote/Poem

2013-05-03 Thread Bill!
My life may appear melancholy,
But travelling through this world
I have entrusted myself to Heaven.
In my sack, three sho of rice;
By the hearth, a bundle of firewood.
If someone asks what is the mark of enlightenment or illusion,
I cannot say...wealth and honor are nothing but dust,
As the evening rain falls I sit in my hermitage
And stretch out both feet in answer. - Daigu Ryokan (1758-1831)

[source: thegreenleaf.co.uk]





Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
zen_forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
zen_forum-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
zen_forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Re: [Zen] Nice Quote/Poem

2013-05-03 Thread Merle Lester


 beautiful..and so to the point!..merle


  
My life may appear melancholy,
But travelling through this world
I have entrusted myself to Heaven.
In my sack, three sho of rice;
By the hearth, a bundle of firewood.
If someone asks what is the mark of enlightenment or illusion,
I cannot say...wealth and honor are nothing but dust,
As the evening rain falls I sit in my hermitage
And stretch out both feet in answer. - Daigu Ryokan (1758-1831)

[source: thegreenleaf.co.uk]