Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On 3/9/2018 6:49 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.32: [+1]: So far, so good

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

On 2018/03/10 02:49:15, "Daniel Ruggeri" <drugg...@primary.net> wrote: > Hi, all; >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to r

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.32: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have a talk

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31

+1... The whole idea is to find bugs and issues before we do a formal release. We found one. It may have been "minor" but releasing s/w with known bugs is not something we should do. We release code when it's ready. > On Mar 7, 2018, at 9:52 AM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@pr

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31

On 07 Mar 2018, at 4:52 PM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net> wrote: > I tend to agree in principle. At the same time, we've discussed here that > version numbers are cheap and that we generally would like to release more > often, so I wanted to 'walk the talk'. Thank you for

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31

On 2018-03-05 10:31, Joe Orton wrote: On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 09:56:50AM -0600, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31

On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 09:56:50AM -0600, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; > >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to relea

Re: Fix for ab defect (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31)

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 3:16 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com] >> Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2018 5:09 PM [] >> In this case though, this is not exactly "100% failure" in any >> circonstances, for

RE: Fix for ab defect (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31)

> -Original Message- > From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2018 5:09 PM > To: httpd-dev <dev@httpd.apache.org> > Subject: Re: Fix for ab defect (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31) > > On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 11:4

Re: Fix for ab defect (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31)

On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 11:48 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > I'd like to ask a followup question... how do we catch this in the > test suite? With this (100% failure), ab still returns a 0 exit code. > It *does* at least give the error message to STDERR. Perhaps we > should

RE: Fix for ab defect (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31)

t: Sunday, March 04, 2018 1:25 PM > To: li...@rhsoft.net > Cc: httpd-dev <dev@httpd.apache.org> > Subject: Fix for ab defect (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31) > > On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 10:51 PM, Yann Ylavic <ylavic@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 6

[RESULT] Release httpd-2.4.31

@httpd.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31 Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.31: [ ] +1: It's not just

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31

On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 4:56 PM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net> wrote: > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate > tarball as 2.4.31: [X] +1: It’s not just good, it’s good enough! Works for me on Debian(s) 9, 8 and 7. No opinion

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31

On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 8:38 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: > > Am 04.03.2018 um 20:33 schrieb Yann Ylavic: >> >> On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 8:27 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: >>> >>> >>> that patchfile is unuseable for rpmbuild >>> >>> + echo 'Patch #4

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31

Am 04.03.2018 um 20:33 schrieb Yann Ylavic: On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 8:27 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: that patchfile is unuseable for rpmbuild + echo 'Patch #4 (httpd-2.4.x-ab-nonblock_length.patch):' Patch #4 (httpd-2.4.x-ab-nonblock_length.patch): + /usr/bin/patch

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31

On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 8:27 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: > > that pacthfile is unuseable for rpmbuild > > + echo 'Patch #4 (httpd-2.4.x-ab-nonblock_length.patch):' > Patch #4 (httpd-2.4.x-ab-nonblock_length.patch): > + /usr/bin/patch --no-backup-if-mismatch -p1 --fuzz=0 > can't

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31

Am 04.03.2018 um 20:24 schrieb Yann Ylavic: On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 10:51 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 6:40 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: -1 "ab" no longer can benchmark https urls, same build-spec and environment (Fedora 26 and 27)

Fix for ab defect (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31)

On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 10:51 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 6:40 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: >> >> -1 >> >> "ab" no longer can benchmark https urls, same build-spec and environment >> (Fedora 26 and 27) > > Hmm, looks like 2.4 is missing

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31

> On Mar 3, 2018, at 4:51 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 6:40 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: >> >> -1 >> >> "ab" no longer can benchmark https urls, same build-spec and environment >> (Fedora 26 and 27) > > Hmm, looks like 2.4 is

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31

On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 6:40 PM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: > > -1 > > "ab" no longer can benchmark https urls, same build-spec and environment > (Fedora 26 and 27) Hmm, looks like 2.4 is missing http://svn.apache.org/r1580928 (second hunk). This somehow never made it to 2.4.x,

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31

Am 03.03.2018 um 16:56 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri:    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.31: [ ] +1: It’s not just good, it’s

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31

On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 10:00 AM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: > On 03/03/2018 04:56 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >> Hi, all; >> >>Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/h

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31

On 03/03/2018 04:56 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; > >    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I know this is a bit nitpicky, and we don't do this in all projects, but...can we please have the

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.31

Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.31: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have

Re: Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:46 AM, Joe Orton wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 09:23:50PM +0100, Yann Ylavic wrote: >> Though this is the "else" (legacy) branch. >> >> $ pkg-config --list-all |grep ^lua > ... >> lua51 Lua - Lua language engine >> lua52

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

All; With the release issues identified during validation, we will call this vote CLOSED with the statement that 2.4.30 is not suitable for public release. I apologise for the clerical error in not noting this sooner. On 2018/02/19 14:54:35, <drugg...@primary.net> wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

It likely makes sense to CLOSE this vote with the result that 2.4.30 is not being released... > On Feb 19, 2018, at 9:54 AM, drugg...@primary.net wrote: > > Hi, all; >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/h

Re: Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 09:23:50PM +0100, Yann Ylavic wrote: > Though this is the "else" (legacy) branch. > > $ pkg-config --list-all |grep ^lua ... > lua51 Lua - Lua language engine > lua52 Lua - Lua language engine > lua5.2

Re: Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 9:10 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 6:56 PM, Joe Orton wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 10:04:30AM -0600, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >>> Correct, as I said this may not be a regression, as it continues to locate

Re: Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 6:56 PM, Joe Orton wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 10:04:30AM -0600, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> Correct, as I said this may not be a regression, as it continues to locate >> /use/lib64 files. >> >> Modern ld is tolerant on linux at least when not in

Re: Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 2:17 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > Hm, it work for me on Centos 6 and 7. What lua packages have you installed? > I only have the 64 bit versions installed. Do you have 32 bit versions > installed as well? The delta between the first attempt after

Re: Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 10:04:30AM -0600, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Correct, as I said this may not be a regression, as it continues to locate > /use/lib64 files. > > Modern ld is tolerant on linux at least when not in -Wall more. Other archs > may not be so kind. r1825147 works for me on

Re: Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

Correct, as I said this may not be a regression, as it continues to locate /use/lib64 files. Modern ld is tolerant on linux at least when not in -Wall more. Other archs may not be so kind. On Feb 23, 2018 09:15, "Eric Covener" wrote: >> Do you end up with an -L/usr/lib for

Re: Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

>> Do you end up with an -L/usr/lib for the module in your CentOS example? >> Did it happen to pick up the lib64 path? Or no lib path at all? > > /usr/src/apache/httpd-2.4.x/srclib/apr/libtool --silent --mode=link gcc > -std=gnu99 -pthread -Wall -O2 -g -o > mod_lua.la -rpath

Re: Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

On 02/23/2018 03:43 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 2:17 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: >> Hm, it work for me on Centos 6 and 7. What lua packages have you installed? >> I only have the 64 bit versions installed. Do you have 32 bit versions >> installed as

Re: Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 2:17 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > Hm, it work for me on Centos 6 and 7. What lua packages have you installed? > I only have the 64 bit versions installed. Do you have 32 bit versions > installed as well? > > On 02/22/2018 10:54 PM, William A Rowe Jr

Re: Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

Hm, it work for me on Centos 6 and 7. What lua packages have you installed? I only have the 64 bit versions installed. Do you have 32 bit versions installed as well? On 02/22/2018 10:54 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > This wasn't pretty; candidate 2.4.30 build on current fedora... > >

Lua detection autoconf mess (was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30)

; Hi, all; > >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate > tarball as 2.4.30: > > > > [ ] +1: It’s no

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

Wow! Nice work! > Am 21.02.2018 um 21:34 schrieb Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de>: > > Am 19.02.2018 um 15:54 schrieb drugg...@primary.net: >> Hi, all; >>Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: >> https://dist.apache.org/repo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.26 as GA

he state of my AIX system I am still +1 on the release. >> >> - proxy/ssl.t almost totally fails with handhsake errors between >> client and origin >> [Tue Jun 13 21:37:04.265062 2017] [ssl:info] [pid 15073386:tid 6169] >> SSL Library Error: error:14

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

Am 19.02.2018 um 15:54 schrieb drugg...@primary.net: Hi, all;    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.30: [ ] +1: It’s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.26 as GA

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 10:05 PM, Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 AIX/xlc/ppc64 > > I have two quirks to record, both are openssl / openssl 1.1 related > but given the state of my AIX system I am still +1 on the release. > > - proxy/ssl.t almost totally fai

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

Am 19.02.2018 um 15:54 schrieb drugg...@primary.net: Hi, all;    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.30: [ ] +1: It’s

Re: svn commit: r25136 - /release/httpd/flood/

, <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: > Author: humbedooh > Date: Mon Feb 19 08:24:18 2018 > New Revision: 25136 > > Log: > Removing flood... > > Removed: > release/httpd/flood/ >

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 6:06 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > -1: I think with the release process hiccups and the Win issues > noted in the "Current branche 2.4.30-dev issues" thread, > we will need a 2.4.31. Additionally, there are some > backpor

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

ache.org >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30 >> >> Another thing that helps is providing some heads-up >> that a T will actually be happening... Yeah, you >> had noted the you were going to T on Monday >> (in the "T of 2.4.30 Proposal" thread) b

RE: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

> -Original Message- > From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 6:10 AM > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30 > > Another thing that helps is providing some heads-up > that a T will actually b

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

iew=markup#l47 >> >> It makes sense that the tag comes from a specific commit where the variable >> was flipped... Should I adjust the script and retry? >> >> -- >> Daniel Ruggeri >> >> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] >> Sent: Mon

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

-1: I think with the release process hiccups and the Win issues noted in the "Current branche 2.4.30-dev issues" thread, we will need a 2.4.31. Additionally, there are some backports in STATUS that could also be folded in. > On Feb 19, 2018, at 9:54 AM, drugg...@primary.net wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

e.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/tags/2.4.30/include/ap_release.h?view=markup#l47 > > It makes sense that the tag comes from a specific commit where the variable > was flipped... Should I adjust the script and retry? > > -- > Daniel Ruggeri > > From: Jim Jagielski [mailto

RE: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

I adjust the script and retry? -- Daniel Ruggeri From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] Sent: Monday, February 19, 2018 9:46 AM To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30 Hmmm... I'm not seeing the patch where AP_SERVER_DEVBUILD_BOOLEAN in ap_release.h is set to 0

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

; in ap_release.h is set to 0 >> >> How does your release process work? What we've always >> done is make the req changes to the branch and then copy >> from that branch to the tag. So the tag itself must refer to >> a specific SVN number on the http-2.4 branch but I'm

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

On 19 Feb 2018, at 5:45 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > Hmmm... I'm not seeing the patch where AP_SERVER_DEVBUILD_BOOLEAN > in ap_release.h is set to 0 > > How does your release process work? What we've always > done is make the req changes to the branch

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

Hmmm... I'm not seeing the patch where AP_SERVER_DEVBUILD_BOOLEAN in ap_release.h is set to 0 How does your release process work? What we've always done is make the req changes to the branch and then copy from that branch to the tag. So the tag itself must refer to a specific SVN number

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

> Am 19.02.2018 um 15:54 schrieb <drugg...@primary.net> <drugg...@primary.net>: > > Hi, all; >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next f

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.30

Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.30: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.5.0-alpha

. Thanks for RM'ing! Bill On Nov 7, 2017 10:28 PM, "Daniel Ruggeri" <drugg...@primary.net> wrote: > Hi, all; > >Please find the proposed 2.5.0-alpha release tarballs and signatures > at the following location. This release candidate was tagged from trunk

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.5.0-alpha

e for this build: http://people.apache.org/~druggeri/tmp/latest_sources.yml) httpd: vote: version_info: configure: build: result: log: test: result: log: system: kernel: name: release: version: machine: libraries: libxyz: Feedback on anything else I sho

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.5.0-alpha

. jacob.perk...@cpanel.net <mailto:jacob.perk...@cpanel.net> Office: 713-529-0800 x 4046 Cell: 713-560-8655 > On Dec 11, 2017, at 3:42 AM, Stefan Eissing <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> > wrote: > > Daniel, I am very much interested in a smooth and more automated > release

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.5.0-alpha

Daniel, I am very much interested in a smooth and more automated release process. However, I am very unfamiliar regarding what is all involved and cannot judge if it is complete. You'd probably want Jim's input on this. Cheers, Stefan > Am 09.12.2017 um 21:05 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri <

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.5.0-alpha

With about a month of time the vote has been running and just a single +1 (my own), I'm of the opinion that this release has died on the vine. I am sensitive to the fact that this is the holiday season, so I will keep it open only a few more days so folks can pipe up if they are still testing

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.5.0-alpha

: Linux release: 3.16.0-4-amd64 version: #1 SMP Debian 3.16.39-1 (2016-12-30) machine: x86_64 libraries: openssl: "1.1.0g" openldap: "2.4.45" apr: "1.6.3" apr-util: "1.6.1" iconv: "1.2.2" brotli: "1.0.1&qu

Re: Let's Encrypt Feature Release

Yep, we had some discussions. Language was for me a problem to get my wishes/issues to get understand. I had also language problems with others on this list in the past. I mostly do not understand all when posted, and I am not understood. It was a pleasure to test mod_md on windows. The

Re: Let's Encrypt Feature Release

Disclaimer: Steffen and me got into each others hairs during the development and testing of mod_md. I often have difficulties understanding what he means. That led to frustrations on both sides, I suppose. In the comment below, I find several things factually wrong, so I need to answer. > Am

Re: Let's Encrypt Feature Release

nded Windows build support in trunk (yay!), I would > really like us to include the Let's Encrypt Support in the next 2.4 release > as an experimental mod_md plus the required and recommended changes to > mod_ssl. > > Atm there is one blocker that prevents me from proposing

Re: Let's Encrypt Feature Release

+1 from me!! > On Nov 15, 2017, at 4:59 AM, Stefan Eissing <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> > wrote: > > Now that Gregg has landed Windows build support in trunk (yay!), I would > really like us to include the Let's Encrypt Support in the next 2.4 release > as an

Re: Let's Encrypt Feature Release

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Stefan Eissing <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> wrote: > Now that Gregg has landed Windows build support in trunk (yay!), I > would really like us to include the Let's Encrypt Support in the next > 2.4 release as an experimental mod_md pl

Let's Encrypt Feature Release

Now that Gregg has landed Windows build support in trunk (yay!), I would really like us to include the Let's Encrypt Support in the next 2.4 release as an experimental mod_md plus the required and recommended changes to mod_ssl. Atm there is one blocker that prevents me from proposing mod_ssl

XML breakage on AIX in 2.4.29 (was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.29 as GA)

On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Eric Covener wrote: >> Below is an addition to the first message: It appears (from the -bloadmap >> output) that XML_Parse is suppossed to be coming from apr-util. Or is it >> APR-UTIL is the caller? >> >> :g/XML_Parse/p >> (ld): keep XML_Parse

Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.29 as GA

> Below is an addition to the first message: It appears (from the -bloadmap > output) that XML_Parse is suppossed to be coming from apr-util. Or is it > APR-UTIL is the caller? > > :g/XML_Parse/p > (ld): keep XML_Parse > ld: 0711-301 WARNING: Symbol specified with the -u flag not defined: >

Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.29 as GA

On 07/11/2017 17:21, Jan Ehrhardt wrote: Steffen in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 19 Oct 2017 23:15:32 +0200): I said before: In Apache.dsw is now project xml removed, it is not building out of the box with current released apr-util. With coming apr-util 1.6.1 it should be possible to build.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.29 as GA

Steffen in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 19 Oct 2017 23:15:32 +0200): >I said before: In Apache.dsw is now project xml removed, it is not >building out of the box with current released apr-util. With coming >apr-util 1.6.1 it should be possible to build. > >With the expat/xml changes in

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.5.0-alpha

is automatic, as is www.apache.org/dist/httpd from the https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/httpd). > * I created two scripts[2] to automate the tagging of SVN and minor file > modifications associated with a release as well as the push of the > tarballs/signatures to the repo mirror. Unfortunat

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.5.0-alpha

> Till now I was assuming that we should get a trunk and a 2.5.0-alfa repo. No, not expected yet.

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.5.0-alpha

25 #include "h2_proxy_util.h" 2.5.0-alfa: 23 #include "mod_proxy_http2.h" 24 #include "h2.h" <== 25 #include "h2_proxy_util.h On Wednesday 08/11/2017 at 05:28, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all; Please find the proposed 2.5.0-alpha release ta

[VOTE] Release httpd 2.5.0-alpha

Hi, all;    Please find the proposed 2.5.0-alpha release tarballs and signatures at the following location. This release candidate was tagged from trunk as of r1814469: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I'd like to call a vote to release this alpha candidate. Please do note

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.29 as GA

Steffen in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 19 Oct 2017 23:15:32 +0200): >I said before: In Apache.dsw is now project xml removed, it is not >building out of the box with current released apr-util. With coming >apr-util 1.6.1 it should be possible to build. > >With the expat/xml changes in

Re: DISCUSS: Establishing a release cadence

> On 2 Nov 2017, at 10:51, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net> wrote: > > Hi, all; > >I know we've chatted about this somewhat in the past so I wanted to > kick off a formal topic to see if we can establish consensus for a > release cadence of httpd. As a

DISCUSS: Establishing a release cadence

Hi, all;    I know we've chatted about this somewhat in the past so I wanted to kick off a formal topic to see if we can establish consensus for a release cadence of httpd. As a strawman proposal, I'd like to suggest that we...  * Ensure stable branches are always in a releasable state (I

[CLOSED] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.29 as GA

Will more than the required 3 +1 (binding) votes and some other unbinding +1 votes, and no -1s, I call this vote not only CLOSED but also PASSED. Thx to all!

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.29 as GA

Well I got it now thanks mostly to your instructions Steefen, took awhile but once I put the the pieces together I see what needs to be done. On 10/20/2017 1:44 AM, Steffen wrote: Nope, just double clicking Apache.dsw does now not create the xml solution.  And without xml solution  httpd

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.29 as GA

Nope, just double clicking Apache.dsw does now not create the xml solution. And without xml solution httpd does not build (httpd regression). When I revert the Apache.dsw changes all fine, no headache and is not complicated at all here. I do not care where expat is located. And cmake

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.29 as GA

On 10/19/2017 5:49 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Steffen wrote: I said before: In Apache.dsw is now project xml removed, it is not building out of the box with current released apr-util. With coming apr-util 1.6.1 it should be possible

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.29 as GA

On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Steffen wrote: > I said before: In Apache.dsw is now project xml removed, it is not building > out of the box with current released apr-util. With coming apr-util 1.6.1 it > should be possible to build. > > With the expat/xml changes in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.29 as GA

; geschreven: > > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd > version 2.4.29 can be found at the usual place: > >http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.29 GA. > > [ ] +1: Good to go > [ ] +0: meh > [ ]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.29 as GA

.net> Office: 713-529-0800 x 4046 Cell: 713-560-8655 > On Oct 17, 2017, at 2:00 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd > version 2.4.29 can be found at the usual place: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.29 as GA

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 03:00:36PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd > version 2.4.29 can be found at the usual place: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.29 GA.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.29 as GA

On 18/10/2017 05:00, Jim Jagielski wrote: > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd > version 2.4.29 can be found at the usual place: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.29 GA. > > [ ] +1: Good to g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.29 as GA

And a +1 report from Bernard Spil , who just built with libressl on debian. > Am 18.10.2017 um 11:06 schrieb Stefan Eissing <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de>: > > > >> Am 17.10.2017 um 21:00 schrieb Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com>: >> >> The

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.29 as GA

> Am 17.10.2017 um 21:00 schrieb Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com>: > > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd > version 2.4.29 can be found at the usual place: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apach

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.29 as GA

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 03:00:36PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd > version 2.4.29 can be found at the usual place: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.29 GA

[VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.29 as GA

The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd version 2.4.29 can be found at the usual place: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.29 GA. [ ] +1: Good to go [ ] +0: meh [ ] -1: Danger Will Robinson. And why. Vote will last

Re: [CLOSED] [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA

Datum: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 13:49:10 -0500 > Von:William A Rowe Jr <wr...@apache.org> > An: annou...@httpd.apache.org > > > > Apache HTTP Server 2.4.28 Released > > October 5, 2017 > > The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache HTTP S

Re: [CLOSED] [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA

roject are pleased to announce the release of version 2.4.28 of the Apache HTTP Server ("Apache"). This version of Apache is our latest GA release of the new generation 2.4.x branch of Apache HTTPD and represents fifteen years of innovation by the project, and is recommended over all p

Re: [CLOSED] [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA

Hrm... looks like it was already announced? At least the website sez it was, and it looks like an Email was sent to announce@a.o but I'm not seeing anything on the httpd lists.

Re: [CLOSED] [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA

FYI: I'll be announcing tomorrow

Re: [CLOSED] [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA

Sorry I ran out of cycles to jump on this on the 4th, and didn't see anyone step up, so I went ahead and still pushed it out a day late/day early this afternoon. Hope you had a worthwhile conference. Please help me double check any errors or omissions, I think it was already staged correctly.

Re: [CLOSED] [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA

Sure. Anyone who wants to announce, please do so!! :) > On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:47 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 6:46 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> With more than the required 3 +1 (binding) votes, and no >> vetos, I call this vote

[CLOSED] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA

gt; wrote: > > The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd > version 2.4.28 can be found at the usual place: > > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.28 GA. > > [ ] +1: Good to go > [ ] +0: meh > [ ] -1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.28 as GA

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote: > Update: disregard the man behind the curtain - for now. > > I have the strangest effects on my main machine under native macOS 10.12.6, > which > do not happen on my parallels ubuntu image and my laptop with

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >