On 03.01.2011 17:49, Mark Thomas wrote:
Hope everyone had a good holiday.
Thanks, hope you had good holidays too!
I think it is time for another 7.0.x release. I'll start going through
the open bugs this week and depending on how long that takes probably
get to the point where 7.0.6 is
On 04.01.2011 11:44, Mark Thomas wrote:
It has been a while since 6.0.29 and there have been a few requests for
this on the users list. Jean-Frederic, do you have any plans for 6.0.30
at this point?
I think a 6.0.30 is kind of overdue. If Jean-Frederic can't start the
release process during
On 06.01.2011 08:42, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Thu Jan 6 07:42:48 2011
New Revision: 1055776
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1055776view=rev
Log:
Add missing information.
Modified:
tomcat/native/branches/1.1.x/xdocs/miscellaneous/changelog.xml
Modified:
Hi Filip,
On 10.01.2011 17:41, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50333
Filip Hanikfha...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
On 10.01.2011 18:18, jean-frederic clere wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.30/
According to the release process, the 6.0.30 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_30 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
- MD5 OK
-
On 10.01.2011 19:54, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.6 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.6/
The svn tag is:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_0_6/
The proposed 7.0.6
On 19.01.2011 20:00, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 19/01/2011 18:53, Ian Darwin wrote:
On 01/19/11 13:47, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 19/01/2011 18:45, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22405
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomasma...@apache.org 2011-01-19 13:45:40
On 19.01.2011 18:23, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I'd prefer to stay CTR for a while. Chances are there are still much to
be fixed given all the changes that have taken place.
+1
On 1/18/2011 11:41 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
All,
Since Tomcat 7.0.x went stable, does that change the
On 24.01.2011 22:51, jean-frederic clere wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.31/
According to the release process, the 6.0.31 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_31 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
- MD5 OK
-
On 22.01.2011 19:01, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The builds for Tomcat 5.5.32 are ready for testing and approval.
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
According to the release process, the 5.5.32 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_5_5_32 [1] is:
On 27.01.2011 21:39, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/1/27 jean-frederic clerejfcl...@gmail.com:
On 01/27/2011 10:30 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/1/25 jean-frederic clerejfcl...@gmail.com:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.31/
On 01.02.2011 02:05, sebb wrote:
On 31 January 2011 20:45,rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Mon Jan 31 20:45:31 2011
New Revision: 1065767
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1065767view=rev
Log:
Add session creation / expiration rate statistics to the session managers.
Backport
+1
On 02.02.2011 16:53, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/2/2 Mark Thomasma...@apache.org:
I'd like to stick to my plan to release Tomcat 7 every month or so. The
last release was ~ 3 weeks ago so that suggests next week. However, I
have some commitments next week that would make tagging and
On 02.02.2011 20:37, jean-frederic clere wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.32/
According to the release process, the 6.0.32 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_32 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
- MD5 OK
-
On 03.02.2011 14:32, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.7 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.7/
The svn tag is:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_0_7/
The proposed 7.0.7
On 04.02.2011 14:52, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.8 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.8/
The svn tag is:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_0_8/
The proposed 7.0.8
On 07.02.2011 21:17, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The builds for Tomcat 5.5.33 are ready for testing and approval.
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
According to the release process, the 5.5.33 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_5_5_33 [1] is:
[
On 07.02.2011 21:17, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The builds for Tomcat 5.5.33 are ready for testing and approval.
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
According to the release process, the 5.5.33 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_5_5_33 [1] is:
[
On 07.02.2011 21:17, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The builds for Tomcat 5.5.33 are ready for testing and approval.
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
According to the release process, the 5.5.33 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_5_5_33 [1] is:
[
Servlet 3 standardizes file uploads. It contains the ability to limit on
request size, pretty much the same as commons fileupload supported for
many years.
It seems when this conditions triggers the rest of the request inout
stream is still drained at the end of the request. swallowInput is
On 10.02.2011 18:00, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
On 2/10/2011 6:04 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Servlet 3 standardizes file uploads. It contains the ability to limit
on request size, pretty much the same as commons fileupload supported
for many years.
It seems when this conditions triggers
On 10.02.2011 18:44, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 10/02/2011 13:04, Rainer Jung wrote:
Servlet 3 standardizes file uploads. It contains the ability to limit on
request size, pretty much the same as commons fileupload supported for
many years.
It seems when this conditions triggers the rest
On 17.02.2011 11:58, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 17/02/2011 10:41, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 17/02/2011 10:30, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 10.02.2011 18:44, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 10/02/2011 13:04, Rainer Jung wrote:
Servlet 3 standardizes file uploads. It contains the ability to limit on
request size
I get test suite failures for TC 7 right now. I'm not sure whether it is
because I changed my testing environment, but the failure seems to be
pretty special, namely a NullPointerException in
MBeanUtils.createObjectName() line 532.
I added some logging and the reason is, that the host
On 25.02.2011 13:01, Mark Thomas wrote:
So, the questions we need to decide:
1. Is the fix for bug 50748 correct? I think it is.
+0
2. Should Tomcat try and handle this situation (e.g. if any bytes have
been written by a filter, commit the response). This could be tricky to
get right when
On 17.02.2011 11:58, Mark Thomas wrote:
Given this, I am leaning even more towards just fixing the original
issue that the connection is not dropped when the request exceeds the
upload limit and leaving the rest of the behaviour unchanged.
Getting back to this (and sorry for the pause): What's
On 05.03.2011 15:32, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.10 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.10/
The svn tag is:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_0_10/
The proposed 7.0.10
On 07.03.2011 22:56, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/3/7rj...@apache.org:
In jk_nsapi_plugin.c:
--- tomcat/jk/trunk/native/iis/jk_isapi_plugin.c (original)
+++ tomcat/jk/trunk/native/iis/jk_isapi_plugin.c Mon Mar 7 15:17:11 2011
@@ -3011,7 +3011,7 @@ static int init_ws_service(isapi_private
On 08.03.2011 22:09, sebb wrote:
On 8 March 2011 17:18,rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Tue Mar 8 17:18:16 2011
New Revision: 1079444
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1079444view=rev
Log:
New context attribute swallowAbortedUploads allows
to make request data swallowing
On 08.03.2011 23:37, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 08/03/2011 17:18, rj...@apache.org wrote:
snip/
Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/connector/Request.java
URL:
Hi all,
some things I noticed while implementing the new switch:
- o.a.c.connector.Request and Response hav methods finishRequest() resp.
finishResponse(). The mehod in the request seems not to be called.
Although that's not a big issue, because the omplementation is empty,
one would run
On 09.03.2011 14:46, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 09/03/2011 05:41, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi all,
some things I noticed while implementing the new switch:
- o.a.c.connector.Request and Response hav methods finishRequest() resp.
finishResponse(). The mehod in the request seems not to be called.
Although
On 10.03.2011 13:03, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.11 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.11/
The svn tag is:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_0_11/
The proposed 7.0.11
On 02.04.2011 01:20, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/4/1 Konstantin Kolinkoknst.koli...@gmail.com:
In the recent run:
[junit] Apr 1, 2011 9:53:27 PM
org.apache.catalina.util.SessionIdGenerator createSecureRandom
[junit] INFO: Creation of SecureRandom instance fo
[junit] r session
On 01.04.2011 20:09, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.12 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.12/
The svn tag is:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_0_12/
The proposed 7.0.12
On 04.04.2011 11:34, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2011-04-03, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 02.04.2011 01:20, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/4/1 Konstantin Kolinkoknst.koli...@gmail.com:
In the recent run:
[junit] Apr 1, 2011 9:53:27 PM
org.apache.catalina.util.SessionIdGenerator
On 07.04.2011 22:35, Sylvain Laurent wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying out git at the moment and found this page
http://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAtApache
Is anyone here using git in front of svn ? any problem, advice ?
I used it some time for the httpd sources. I like that it is easy to
transfer
On 11.04.2011 11:34, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 04/11/2011 09:00 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/4/11 Mladen Turkmt...@apache.org:
Hi,
I plan to create a
sandbox/connectors/native/iis7
for a native IIS7 C++ connector
(since Microsoft deprecated ISAPI)
Any objections?
I do not mind.
Though
On 27.04.2011 08:53, Henri Gomez wrote:
Now that HTTP connector is as fast as AJP connector, is it still required ?
Performance isn't a reasion for AJP in the last say 5 or more years. The
major benefits of AJP are
- smooth integration of a reverse proxy
The connector patches the
We recently had some mime type additions, and the new BZ 51137 asks for
more. I did some checking between the mime type file of httpd 2.3 latest
and TC. There are about 600 more mime types in the httpd file, some of
them with more than one suffix.
Some entries are inconsistent between the two
I hope the following is not too long and confusing ...
On 03.05.2011 22:02, Mark Thomas wrote:
Scenario
This ended up being very long, so I moved it to the end. The exact
pattern of delays will vary depending on timeouts, request frequency
etc. but the scenario shows an example of how
On 06.05.2011 17:37, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.13 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.13/
The svn tag is:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_0_13/
The proposed 7.0.13
Hi Felix,
TMTOWTDI. For standalone scripts I don't care very much about style.
Let's see below ...
On 08.05.2011 13:17, Felix Schumacher wrote:
Hi Rainer,
Am Dienstag, den 03.05.2011, 12:12 + schrieb rj...@apache.org:
Author: rjung
Date: Tue May 3 12:12:35 2011
New Revision: 1099032
On 10.05.2011 01:31, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.14 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.14/
The svn tag is:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_0_14/
The proposed 7.0.14
On 10.05.2011 20:11, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 10/05/2011 18:46, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 10.05.2011 01:31, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.14 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.14/
The svn tag is:
http
On 10.05.2011 21:32, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 10.05.2011 20:11, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 10/05/2011 18:46, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 10.05.2011 01:31, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.14 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev
On 17.05.2011 19:24, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Tue May 17 17:24:36 2011
New Revision: 1104422
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1104422view=rev
Log:
Add remaining attributes to documentation
AJP-NIO now passes Servlet TCK - remove experimental label
w00t!
+1 to Marks proposal.
Shot additional answer to Konstantin inline.
On 18.05.2011 16:43, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
Will the commit messages be forwarded to the mailing list?
At least the web server project does it like that. For an example see
On 25.05.2011 00:15, Christopher Schultz wrote:
All,
I'm not sure what the policy is on documentation changes and
back-porting to already-released versions of mod_jk, but this clarifies
how mod_jk works and would be beneficial to have on the web site without
having to wait for a new release
On 24.05.2011 22:19, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 24/05/2011 20:24, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/5/24 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
1. In what repository will the artifacts go?
IIRC, there is some additional repository. I think it wouldn't be good
to have them in /repos/asf/
There is a separate
On 26.05.2011 15:36, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Rainer,
On 5/26/2011 5:06 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
There are enough changes for a 1.2.32 anyhow, so I would propose we
start a new release cycle in about 2 weeks.
Sounds great.
Someone looking at the IPV6 patch (BZ 43968)?
Rainer
Hi Mark,
On 05.06.2011 12:06, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/AbstractHttp11Processor.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/AbstractHttp11Processor.java?rev=1132362r1=1132361r2=1132362view=diff
Not a vote yet:
I get a test failure:
Testcase: testWelcomeFileStrict took 0.005 sec
Caused an ERROR
Forked Java VM exited abnormally. Please note the time in the report
does not reflect the time until the VM exit.
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Forked Java VM exited abnormally.
Not a vote yet:
I get a test failure:
Testcase: testWelcomeFileStrict took 0.005 sec
Caused an ERROR
Forked Java VM exited abnormally. Please note the time in the report
does not reflect the time until the VM exit.
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Forked Java VM exited abnormally.
+for (int i = valueL - 1; i colonPos; i--) {
+int charValue = HexUtils.getDec(valueB[i + valueS]);
Any idea, why hex digits (including a-f, A-F) are allowed in port numbers?
I know you only moved that code, but it reminded me of an observation I
made long ago
On 07.06.2011 21:39, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 07/06/2011 20:24, Jess Holle wrote:
web apps whose web.xml does not specify distributable should certainly
not be treated as such -- that would be a spec violation and break lots
of web apps.
How many times do I have to write this? This is NOT what
failing little TC test to
investigate the APR problem :)
Regards,
Rainer
On 05.06.2011 18:33, Rainer Jung wrote:
Not a vote yet:
I get a test failure:
Testcase: testWelcomeFileStrict took 0.005 sec
Caused an ERROR
Forked Java VM exited abnormally. Please note the time in the report
I like it :)
On 09.06.2011 22:10, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jun 9 20:10:23 2011
New Revision: 1134063
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1134063view=rev
Log:
Document the state transition diagram
Modified:
Our docs page about Tomcat Maven artefacts
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/maven-jars.html
seems outdated. The staging repository linked there doesn't contain
anything after 7.0.2. The text below the link indicates something about
switching to the ASF main repos, but I think we could be
Thanks Mark. I had put my new changelog entry into the Coyote section.
Maybe that's not optimal for your Maven entry, which seems to be more
like General.
Regards,
Rainer
On 12.06.2011 21:28, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Sun Jun 12 19:28:17 2011
New Revision: 1134965
URL:
I had some spare time for analyzing the crashes in
TestMapperWelcomeFiles. It seems there are several varieties, but at
least I do now understand enough to report here:
In Http11AprProcessor.process() when parsing the request line fails,
e.g. it is not yet there, we add the socket back to the
On 13.06.2011 17:49, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 13/06/2011 16:07, Rainer Jung wrote:
I had some spare time for analyzing the crashes in
TestMapperWelcomeFiles. It seems there are several varieties, but at
least I do now understand enough to report here:
...
This seems to be a flaw. I suggest we
On 11.06.2011 13:33, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed 7.0.16 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 7.0.16 Alpha
[ ] Beta - go ahead and release as 7.0.16 Beta
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.16 Stable
+1 for stable.
- MD5 OK
- signatures OK
On 15.06.2011 14:49, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 15/06/2011 13:29, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
The failure happened in
[junit] Test org.apache.catalina.core.TestAsyncContextImpl FAILED
when running with NIO. Running the same test with BIO was OK. The log
file from the test is [1].
[1]:
On 15.06.2011 14:49, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 15/06/2011 13:29, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
The failure happened in
[junit] Test org.apache.catalina.core.TestAsyncContextImpl FAILED
when running with NIO. Running the same test with BIO was OK. The log
file from the test is [1].
[1]:
On 15.06.2011 08:18, 姚伟斌 wrote:
Hi, folks,
I have some questions about the ajp1.3 connector. Is there any other
official document for ajp1.3 connector? This url (
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/ajp/ajpv13a.html) seems lack of
something.
No, that is the official protocol
Notice: currently I get test failures when testing APR. Just in caes
someone else is also wondering - you are not alone :)
org.apache.catalina.connector.TestCoyoteAdapter
crash in testPathParmsFooSessionValue (jni Socker recvbb)
org.apache.catalina.connector.TestKeepAliveCount
Current assumption: Fixed by r1137372.
It'll take some time until I have seen enough passing tests.
Will report back.
Regards,
Rainer
On 19.06.2011 14:52, Rainer Jung wrote:
Notice: currently I get test failures when testing APR. Just in caes
someone else is also wondering - you are not alone
On 19.06.2011 16:36, Rainer Jung wrote:
Current assumption: Fixed by r1137372.
It'll take some time until I have seen enough passing tests.
Will report back.
5 runs through the test suite later it looks good now (pre r1137375).
Regards,
Rainer
Since Mladens change r918873 in March 2010 we use eval instead of exec
in the shell scripts. The svn log says:
Use eval instead direct call or exec command so that arguments with
spaces are properly handled
Eval leaves a copy of the shell process hanging around until Tomcat
shutdown. I want to
1) Renaming
Since quite some time now the setclasspath script doesn't have anything
to do with setting a class path. It only searches for JRE / JDK and sets
up the path to the Java or JDB binary plus JAVA_ENDORSED_DIRS.
So it would be more correct to call it checkjava.sh or setupjava.sh or
On 20.06.2011 14:52, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 06/20/2011 01:39 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Since Mladens change r918873 in March 2010 we use eval instead of exec
in the shell scripts. The svn log says:
Use eval instead direct call or exec command so that arguments with
spaces are properly handled
On 20.06.2011 14:54, Leon Rosenberg wrote:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
1) Renaming
Since quite some time now the setclasspath script doesn't have anything
to do with setting a class path. It only searches for JRE / JDK and sets
up the path
On 20.06.2011 14:56, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 06/20/2011 02:37 PM, rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Mon Jun 20 12:37:01 2011
New Revision: 1137607
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1137607view=rev
Log:
Slight improvement of configtest handling in
Unix shell script:
- add to
On 20.06.2011 14:56, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 06/20/2011 02:37 PM, rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Mon Jun 20 12:37:01 2011
New Revision: 1137607
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1137607view=rev
Log:
Slight improvement of configtest handling in
Unix shell script:
- add to
On 20.06.2011 15:41, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 06/20/2011 03:28 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 20/06/2011 14:21, Mladen Turk wrote:
Just don't see what was the problem with that option that
would require it to go away. This wasn't discussed on the dev list
so if I weren't tracking the svn commits it
On 20.06.2011 16:06, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 06/20/2011 03:53 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 20.06.2011 15:41, Mladen Turk wrote:
In general all commands except those that start a Tomcat (and thus
deploy webapps etc.) should not use that type of params. They should go
into CATALINA_OPTS. Everything
Should we use the new OneLineFormatter as the default juli formatter?
I never found anyone who liked the default java.util.logging log format,
which spreads all messages out via two lines. One line contains the
timestamp, the other line the message.
So if your grep for a message, you want find
Thanks Konstantin. I'll take a look at cleaning up 1) to 3), likely
using the DateFormatCache from the AccessLogValve as a utility class.
Regards,
Rainer
On 20.06.2011 18:52, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/6/20 Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de:
Should we use the new OneLineFormatter
On 20.06.2011 20:10, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 20/06/2011 19:07, Rainer Jung wrote:
Thanks Konstantin. I'll take a look at cleaning up 1) to 3), likely
using the DateFormatCache from the AccessLogValve as a utility class.
Already on it. Note DateFormatCache can't be used because a) JULI can't
A version using the DateFormatCache is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~rjung/patches/OneLineFormatter-DateFormatCache.patch
Regards,
Rainer
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional
On 21.06.2011 00:28, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Mon Jun 20 22:28:57 2011
New Revision: 1137803
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1137803view=rev
Log:
Ordering
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
I always forget whether there's a standard (I would
On 21.06.2011 09:54, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
Rainer implemented this in 7.0.x and it will be included in 7.0.17 onwards.
Sorry, this BZ slipped my attention.
Thanks.
Rainer
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Noticing that e maintain two copies of jarsToSkip lists, one in
catalina.properties and one in TomcatBaseTest, I was thinking about a
test case to compare the two. I then stumbled over our
catalina.properties copy in the startup package, which doesn't have a
jarsToSkip at all.
File
On 23.06.2011 09:42, Rainer Jung wrote:
Noticing that e maintain two copies of jarsToSkip lists, one in
catalina.properties and one in TomcatBaseTest, I was thinking about a
test case to compare the two. I then stumbled over our
catalina.properties copy in the startup package, which doesn't
On 23.06.2011 11:40, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 23/06/2011 08:42, Rainer Jung wrote:
Noticing that e maintain two copies of jarsToSkip lists, one in
catalina.properties and one in TomcatBaseTest, I was thinking about a
test case to compare the two. I then stumbled over our
catalina.properties copy
On 21.06.2011 11:40, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/6/20 Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de:
1) Renaming
Since quite some time now the setclasspath script doesn't have anything
to do with setting a class path. It only searches for JRE / JDK and sets
up the path to the Java or JDB binary
Since OneLineFormatter now uses the DateFormatCache util class, and to
prevent any dependency of juli form other packages that util class sits
in juli, what do we think about using it also in AccessLogValve?
At the moment the valve has a local copy as an inner class. Of course a
dependency on
At the moment the file globs we support in the loader definitions in
catalina.properties are hard coded to DIRECTORY/*.jar.
Sometimes it would be helpful to allow a bit more flexible globs, like
e.g. log4j-1.2.*.jar or similar.
Would there be any interest if I would investigate whether we can
Hi Chris,
On 23.06.2011 16:29, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Rainer,
On 6/23/2011 7:33 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 21.06.2011 11:40, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/6/20 Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de:
1) Renaming
Since quite some time now the setclasspath script doesn't have anything
On 23.06.2011 16:34, Rainer Jung wrote:
At the moment the file globs we support in the loader definitions in
catalina.properties are hard coded to DIRECTORY/*.jar.
Sometimes it would be helpful to allow a bit more flexible globs, like
e.g. log4j-1.2.*.jar or similar.
Would there be any
On 23.06.2011 16:51, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Rainer,
On 6/23/2011 10:39 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Globs in the file name and not
the directory part is the most important use case and easy to understand
in its consequences. So I lean towards this type of improvement right now.
So
And this would be the patch:
http://people.apache.org/~rjung/patches/tc7-loader-glob.patch
Regards,
Rainer
On 23.06.2011 16:39, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 23.06.2011 16:34, Rainer Jung wrote:
At the moment the file globs we support in the loader definitions in
catalina.properties are hard coded
On 23.06.2011 19:46, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/6/23 Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de:
At the moment the file globs we support in the loader definitions in
catalina.properties are hard coded to DIRECTORY/*.jar.
Sometimes it would be helpful to allow a bit more flexible globs, like
e.g
On 24.06.2011 22:22, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/6/24 ma...@apache.org:
Author: markt
Date: Fri Jun 24 16:43:40 2011
New Revision: 1139381
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1139381view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50949
Provide the ability to
discuss the technical details
here, and if the list doesn't find a solution for you, you can open a bug.
Regards,
Rainer
Rainer Jung-3 wrote:
Since Mladens change r918873 in March 2010 we use eval instead of exec
in the shell scripts. The svn log says:
Use eval instead direct call or exec
On 26.06.2011 17:35, bradleymccrorey wrote:
Rainer Jung-3 wrote:
Did you follow the later messages in this discusison thread?
I made an error in not including all quotes use din catalina.sh in my
simpl test script. So when using the correct scripts, the eval did *not*
leave a copy
On 26.06.2011 17:59, bradleymccrorey wrote:
Rainer Jung-3 wrote:
You can clearly see here that there are two processes: one for the shell
script, and one for the actual java process. Is this not what I should be
seeing?
You should, bot only when using run, which is precisely meant
+1, great!
On 27.06.2011 20:03, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
I have a time slot available so I volunteer as a 1.2.32 RM.
Think we are good for a new release.
Comments, objections?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Motivated by
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3841
I tested response.encodeURL(http://localhost:8080;) and I get
http://localhost:8080;jsessionid=... (cookies off).
Note that there is no slash between the port and the sessionid path info.
According to my reading of RFC3986 (URIs),
701 - 800 of 2002 matches
Mail list logo
