[Dri-devel] BSD DRM updates

2001-05-03 Thread Eric Anholt
see still needing to be done are changing return -ERR type things to DRM_OS_RETURN( ERR ) and dealing with inlines. I'll try out the drivers now that I've got the first set of diffs up. It's in the 4.3-STABLE section with today's date. http://www.teleport.com/~anholt/devel/dri -- Eric Anholt

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-patches] CVS Update: xc (branch: bsd-2-0-0-branch)

2001-05-20 Thread Eric Anholt
] ), unrouteable mail domain apply Eric's fixes for AGP support I went looking through dri-devel a bit to see if I could find more information, not much luck. What was fixed? (here's hoping for a very good answer.. hehe) -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-patches] CVS Update: xc (branch: trunk)

2001-09-11 Thread Eric Anholt
FreeBSD-current and ATI Rage Mobility DRI build on? Joe -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [Xpert]Radeon 2D accel very slow when DRI is enabled.

2001-11-20 Thread Eric Anholt
, and AGP 2x is being used. MTRR not functional on serverworks. -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

[Dri-devel] mesa-4-0-branch Imakefile fixes

2002-02-04 Thread Eric Anholt
BSD make is choking on some of the mesa Imakefiles in mesa-4-0-branch. A patch is attached, which I think is correct. Index: xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/math/Imakefile === RCS file:

Re: [Dri-devel] Restoring DRM Library Device Independence

2002-04-02 Thread Eric Anholt
: In the limited time I have at the moment, Yes. I'll help. It'd be worth dragging Eric Anholt into this as he's been doing a lot with this too. Eric - are you reading this ? Alan. ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https

Re: [Dri-devel] libGL compatability

2002-04-09 Thread Eric Anholt
Also, are people testing older X servers with new DRMs? In particular, has anyone used a mesa4 or tcl Radeon DRM with a 4.1.0/4.2.0 X Server? At this point I have a FreeBSD DRM set which is mesa4 but with drmcommand and tcl bits pulled in, working for Radeon with TCL and I think for the other

Re: [Dri-devel] libGL compatability

2002-04-19 Thread Eric Anholt
-2-0-0-branch DRM but with some modifications) will soon become a part of the FreeBSD kernel. It's been pretty well tested with 4.1.0 and 4.2.0, so I feel good about this. Eric Anholt wrote: Also, are people testing older X servers with new DRMs? In particular, has anyone used a mesa4

[Dri-devel] DRM memory use questions

2002-04-21 Thread Eric Anholt
I'm looking at getting PCI card support for FreeBSD, and I have some questions about the DRM's memory use and what it expects. Does any of the code (in the entire DRM) rely on memory being physically contiguous? Does __get_free_pages return pages that will be physically contiguous? Why aren't

Re: [Dri-devel] Quick question about FreeBSD

2002-04-26 Thread Eric Anholt
On Thu, 2002-04-25 at 13:43, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: Can anyone fill me in really quickly about the status of the DRI under FreeBSD? I know that some cards work (Voodoo3 and G400, iirc), but is the latest code on the trunk usable under FreeBSD? Do you still need to pull the code from the

[Dri-devel] OS-templated DRM

2002-05-13 Thread Eric Anholt
the code, and if they like it, what about the process for getting it into CVS? -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~eanholt/dri/ ___ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply

Re: [Dri-devel] OS-templated DRM

2002-05-13 Thread Eric Anholt
places from what's in FreeBSD CVS (and it would work on linux for sure). When I was adding the code to FreeBSD I was working off of diff as little as possible to bsd-2-0-0-branch, while for DRI CVS it would be make fewer differences compared to current DRI trunk -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Dri-devel] OS-templated DRM

2002-05-20 Thread Eric Anholt
the device-independent (most drm_*.h) files to be split for Linux/BSD? I won't be able to come to the developer meeting tomorrow (or for the next 3 weeks) because it conflicts with class. I'll be in an hour before the meeting starts if anyone wants to talk. -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: [Dri-devel] OS-templated DRM

2002-05-20 Thread Eric Anholt
On Mon, 2002-05-20 at 03:44, Keith Whitwell wrote: Is your latest code available somewhere? The latest code is still at: http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~eanholt/dri/sysdrm-2002-05-13.tar.gz (Haven't worked on it for a bit, waiting for decisions on what's going to happen with it). -- Eric Anholt

[Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-patches] CVS Update: xc (branch: bsd-3-0-0-branch)

2002-05-28 Thread Eric Anholt
drm.h to the top of the file. At this point I'll take a look and see if there are updates that need to be brought over from linux's drm*.h, and after that it would be time to look at making os-independent files. -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~eanholt/dri

[Dri-devel] r128 strangeness

2002-06-18 Thread Eric Anholt
think it's a versioning issue. Has anyone else seen this? -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~eanholt/dri/ Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy

[Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-patches] CVS Update: xc (branch: bsd-3-0-0-branch)

2002-06-20 Thread Eric Anholt
On Thu, 2002-06-20 at 23:58, Eric Anholt wrote: CVSROOT: /cvsroot/dri Module name: xc Repository: xc/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/shared/drm/kernel/ Changes by: anholt@usw-pr-cvs1. 02/06/20 22:58:50 Log message: Hook up os-independence of r128 for Linux. I

[Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-patches] CVS Update: xc (branch: bsd-3-0-0-branch)

2002-06-26 Thread Eric Anholt
it to work. At this point, who should review this for a merge? -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~eanholt/dri/ --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber Inc. Don't miss the IM event of the season | Special offer

[Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-patches] CVS Update: xc (branch: bsd-3-0-0-branch)

2002-06-26 Thread Eric Anholt
On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 23:12, Jens Owen wrote: Eric Anholt wrote: Log message: The drmCommand interface was passing a size to DRM_IOR() and friends, when DRM_IOR was expecting a type, so on BSD only an int was copied in/out of the kernel. Make drmCommand use new DRM_IOC

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-patches] CVS Update: xc (branch:bsd-3-0-0-branch)

2002-06-27 Thread Eric Anholt
see. Normal BSD users won't be relying on the DRI CVS or even XFree86 release DRMs, and instead will get them from their OS. -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~eanholt/dri/ --- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http

Re: [Dri-devel] os-independence compilation

2002-06-27 Thread Eric Anholt
ambitious... Keith Should be fixed, going to run through testing cards on linux again. BTW, I'm in #dri-devel for more real-time responses. -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~eanholt/dri/ --- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek

[Dri-devel] Some bsd-3-0-0-branch benchmarks.

2002-06-27 Thread Eric Anholt
about the Radeon numbers. -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~eanholt/dri/ --- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Dri-devel] OS Independent Templates

2002-07-02 Thread Eric Anholt
). Same thing happens if I add a -rbsd-3-0-0branch before the other -r arg. I would like to be able to easily cvs diff directories between branches. I thought from reading the manpage I could do this, but it's not working. -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lclark.edu/~eta/dri

[Dri-devel] bsd-3-0-0-branch status

2002-07-03 Thread Eric Anholt
. - graphics droppings when dragging a glxgears around with pageflip enabled. - white streak on the top of the screen running glxgears the first time. (may not happen later after having run it before). Doesn't sound like it's dependent on pageflip. -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: [Dri-devel] bsd-3-0-0-branch status

2002-07-04 Thread Eric Anholt
On Thu, 2002-07-04 at 00:10, Keith Whitwell wrote: Eric Anholt wrote: Here's my current list of concerns about the state of both the branch and the general CVS support of Radeons (since that's what another user and I are both playing with the most). BSD branch's fault - I haven't

Re: [Dri-devel] Core dumped

2002-07-05 Thread Eric Anholt
dying? (be sure to use LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose) People have had banshees working on fbsd before. One thing that some have had to do is: export FX_GLIDE_NUM_TMU=2 before running their apps. If you needed it too, I'll try to check in a fix for the port. -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

[Dri-devel] can't remove files from trunk

2002-07-05 Thread Eric Anholt
/radeon_drv.c' cvs server: failed to remove tag `HEAD' from `radeon/radeon_drv.h' cvs server: failed to remove tag `HEAD' from `radeon/radeon_state.c' cvs commit: saving log message in /tmp/cvs80lKSc -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri

[Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-users] Duplicate/redundant DRM files in trunk (Was: Radeondrivers don't install...)

2002-07-08 Thread Eric Anholt
mga_warp.c r128.h r128_cce.c r128_drm.h r128_drv.h r128_state.c radeon.h radeon_cp.c radeon_drm.h radeon_drv.h radeon_state.c from .../linux/drm/kernel? Yes, they should be cvs rm'ed now. -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

[Dri-devel] xf86drm.c patch to help FreeBSD's linux compatibility

2002-07-09 Thread Eric Anholt
? In the meantime I think I'll be making custom linux binaries with this patch for FreeBSD. Joe: I did it this way, because sometimes I've run a linux binary which mangled my /dev/dri/card0, and I've used a FreeBSD binary as root to correct it. It also seemed like an easy fix. -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Dri-devel] I found the answer I was looking for.

2002-07-10 Thread Eric Anholt
they have specific examples of subrevisions. It looks like they have harvested some nonexistent pci ids. Compare it to xf86PciInfo.h in programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/common/. I've had reports for just about all of the ones listed for XFree86 which support DRI. -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

[Dri-devel] SSE on Athlons (and FreeBSD)

2002-07-11 Thread Eric Anholt
was on the order of 1%, so it was a poor benchmark to use. Anyone opposed to me committing? -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/ Index: extras/Mesa/src/X86/common_x86.c === RCS file: /cvsroot/dri/xc/xc

Re: [Dri-devel] SSE on Athlons (and FreeBSD)

2002-07-12 Thread Eric Anholt
On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 06:22, Dave Jones wrote: On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 02:46:24AM -0600, Eric Anholt wrote: A better fix would be to actually enable SSE before FreeBSD does its feature flag detection. Linux does the following very early on.. You're thinking of the wrong issue. The issue

Re: [Dri-devel] radeon.o DRM module doesn't build (today's checkoutof the trunc)

2002-07-13 Thread Eric Anholt
/include -c radeon_state.c -o radeon_state.o In file included from radeon_state.c:31: drmP.h:170: warning: static declaration for `vmalloc_to_page_Rsmp_667fae44' follows non-static ld -r radeon_drv.o radeon_cp.o radeon_state.o -o radeon.o -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org

Re: [Dri-devel] R200-0-1-branch devfs patch.

2002-07-15 Thread Eric Anholt
the PCI ids (so they don't get probed as supported cards and then attach the DRM uselessly). What does using that linux version of the struct do to improve Linux support? (your other mail about it confused me). -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri

Re: [Dri-devel] mga-stereo-patch

2002-09-22 Thread Eric Anholt
SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND 269 root 22 0 80040K 5584K rdnvbl 0 0:54 4.93% 4.93% glxgears -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/ Index: lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/r200/r200_context.c

Re: [Dri-devel] mga-stereo-patch

2002-09-24 Thread Eric Anholt
to make that. Perhaps when I get around to looking at the gamma code (the other major user of a future DRM_WAKEUP and friends) again I'll try to fix that up. Or Mach64. Was there a trunk merge to mach64 after the bsd-3-0-0 merge? I should be working on it very soon. -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL

Re: [Dri-devel] mga-stereo-patch

2002-09-24 Thread Eric Anholt
On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 17:08, Michel Dänzer wrote: On Die, 2002-09-24 at 10:08, Eric Anholt wrote: On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 09:00, Michel Dänzer wrote: I've incorporated this and turned it into a template: http://penguinppc.org/~daenzer/DRI/drm-vblank-template.diff I've put

[Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-patches] CVS Update: xc (branch: trunk)

2002-09-26 Thread Eric Anholt
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 00:58, Eric Anholt wrote: CVSROOT: /cvsroot/dri Module name: xc Repository: xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/r200/ Changes by: anholt@usw-pr-cvs1. 02/09/26 00:58:14 Log message: R200 sync-to-vblank support (set LIBGL_THROTTLE_REFRESH=1) Okay, that concludes

[Dri-devel] MGA framerate throttling patch

2002-09-29 Thread Eric Anholt
it. -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/ --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Dri-devel mailing list

Re: [Dri-devel] waiting for anoncvs_dri's still there ;-(

2002-10-09 Thread Eric Anholt
minutes. I was pretty happy. -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/ --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: driver feature table

2002-10-19 Thread Eric Anholt
i8xx:no mga ? (probably doesn't work, but shouldn't be hard to fix) tdfx:? (probably doesn't work, but shouldn't be hard to fix) Glide3 is endian clean? It's got code in it for PPC (Macs). I don't know about linux + PPC, though. -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: [Dri-devel] libGL{U,w}

2002-11-07 Thread Eric Anholt
, and BuildLibraries was is to NO for the DRI tree (I was just reverting a change made during the 4.2.99.2 merge). libXThrStub is only used by libX11, which is also not in the tree. Although I haven't actually tried a build with libGLU/libGLw, I don't expect there to be any problems. -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [Xpert]Re: But *why* no vblank?

2002-11-24 Thread Eric Anholt
to hijack the si_code field for this use? Where would the timestamp go that was talked about? Also, shouldn't you be using list_add/list_del for those list things done? -- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri

Re: [Dri-devel] what happened to cvs at sourceforge?

2003-01-16 Thread Eric Anholt
: http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=2352group_id=1 -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.NET email is sponsored

Re: [Dri-devel] [patch] mtx_destroy() for FreeBSD 5.0/-current

2003-02-04 Thread Eric Anholt
hoping to merge to trunk soon. Sorry for the duplication of work. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.NET email is sponsored

[Dri-devel] changes in bsd-4-0-0-branch

2003-02-04 Thread Eric Anholt
from trunk as of a few days ago was: http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/bsd-4-0-0-diff -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED

[Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-patches] CVS Update: xc (branch: trunk)

2003-02-08 Thread Eric Anholt
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 17:46, Eric Anholt wrote: CVSROOT: /cvsroot/dri Module name: xc Repository: xc/xc/lib/GL/dri/drm/ Changes by: anholt@sc8-pr-cvs1. 03/02/08 17:46:32 Log message: Use the right subdirs for NetBSD. Modified files: xc/xc/lib/GL/dri/drm

Re: [Dri-devel] CVS branches.

2003-02-12 Thread Eric Anholt
On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 04:23, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: Hey folks, I'm trying to find out the branch to use for NetBSD. I know that Eric Anholt posted it here in the not-too-distant past, but I can't seem to find the e-mail from him anywhere (and the search mechanism on sourceforge

Re: [Dri-devel] mach64-0-0-6-branch

2003-02-15 Thread Eric Anholt
on ati_pcigart.h/drm_scatter.h conversion). If you would approve of me moving the mach64 files to shared/drm/kernel, I could at least work on things incrementally (much of this stuff is mechanical changes), and then hopefully provide something pretty to review for pci_alloc_consistent. -- Eric Anholt

Re: [Dri-devel] DRM OS Independence and Mach64

2003-02-17 Thread Eric Anholt
to work on this once we've got the lists issue cleared up. I think I understand the busdma stuff pretty decently at this point. At any rate, the remainder of the attached patch is trivial additions of DRM_ERR, DRM_CURRENTPID, etc. and a couple of whitespace tweaks. Looks good to me. -- Eric

[Dri-devel] HEADSUP: bsd-4-0-0-branch merging

2003-02-20 Thread Eric Anholt
I'm currently working on merging bsd-4-0-0-branch to trunk, starting with the merge to the branch. If things stay quiet on the trunk, that would be wonderful. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Dri-devel] HEADSUP: bsd-4-0-0-branch merging

2003-02-21 Thread Eric Anholt
On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 16:30, Eric Anholt wrote: I'm currently working on merging bsd-4-0-0-branch to trunk, starting with the merge to the branch. If things stay quiet on the trunk, that would be wonderful. Been a busy night and cvs conflicts have been troubling me. I've got a merged version

Re: [Dri-devel] drm-filp-0-1-branch and radeon

2003-03-12 Thread Eric Anholt
some fundamental braino's in the orignal drm... It's the second thing on my list, after some mopup after the XFree86 4.3.0 update. I haven't looked at it seriously enough yet. Please give me a few days to get it at least building again on BSD. -- Eric Anholt

Re: [Dri-devel] drm-filp-0-1-branch and radeon

2003-03-13 Thread Eric Anholt
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 00:51, Keith Whitwell wrote: Eric Anholt wrote: On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 05:57, Keith Whitwell wrote: OK, now that the recycle lockup has been found fixed, I don't see any problems with this patch. Has anyone got any objections to merging it to the trunk? Eric

[Dri-devel] read/write/select/poll of DRM?

2003-03-13 Thread Eric Anholt
Does anything use read/write/poll on the DRM? The drm-filp changes will touch all of the device entry points for BSD, and I was wondering if these functions are still used/useful in the current state of things. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http

[Dri-devel] Re: [forum] Re: [XFree86] Invitation for public discussion aboutthe future of X

2003-03-27 Thread Eric Anholt
on it. Because it's DRI related I have been granted DRI CVS access and can do work there. But if I had been working on something like this through XFree86 for this long without CVS access, I would most likely have moved on to another project a while ago. -- Eric Anholt

Re: [Dri-devel] MGA and lockups during shutdown or switchmode

2003-04-04 Thread Eric Anholt
this cause a hang? -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-patches] CVS Update: xc (branch:texmem-0-0-1)

2003-04-12 Thread Eric Anholt
as before, just with the window in a different place. I'll take a look at that, though. Another question: the advantage of Allocate/FreeOffscreenArea()s in the TransitionTo2/3d is to leave more room for pixmaps in the 2d-only case, right? -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL

Re: [Dri-devel] Linux libGL ABI question

2003-08-21 Thread Eric Anholt
\ --defsym glXGetVisualFromFBConfigSGIX=glXGetVisualFromFBConfig That would work, but would it be acceptable? Or use static void bar(int) __attribute__ ((alias(foo))); ? gcc-specific, but probably not worse than doing it with ld. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED

[Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-patches] CVS Update: xc (branch: config-0-0-1-branch)

2003-08-26 Thread Eric Anholt
On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 17:45, Eric Anholt wrote: CVSROOT: /cvsroot/dri Module name: xc Repository: xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/common/ Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/08/25 17:45:05 Log message: Fix config-0-0-1-branch on FreeBSD: expat is located in /usr/local, so we need

[Dri-devel] SiS DRI

2003-08-26 Thread Eric Anholt
in CVS. I've made about 100 commits to sis in my sis branch, which none of you would have wanted to watch anyway. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-patches] CVS Update: xc (branch:config-0-0-1-branch)

2003-08-26 Thread Eric Anholt
On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 03:46, Felix Kühling wrote: On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 17:58:41 -0700 Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 17:45, Eric Anholt wrote: CVSROOT: /cvsroot/dri Module name: xc Repository: xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/common/ Changes

RE: [Dri-devel] Re: 2.4.22-rc2 unresolved symbols in drm/sis.o when CONFIG_AGP=m

2003-08-26 Thread Eric Anholt
nobody minds me making massive style changes on the sis DRM code. I find it quite ugly at the moment. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Dri-devel] SiS DRI status

2003-08-30 Thread Eric Anholt
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 17:22, Ian Romanick wrote: Eric Anholt wrote: My current diff is at: http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/sis-14.diff Since building the SiS driver is disabled, I don't see any reason to not commit your changes. This will allow more adventureous people

Re: [Dri-devel] SiS DRI status

2003-09-01 Thread Eric Anholt
On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 03:47, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: Am Samstag, 30. August 2003 00:02 schrieb Eric Anholt: My current diff is at: http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/sis-14.diff It's against DRI CVS. Should work fine on Linux/FreeBSD, with or without sisfb. I haven't

Re: Sourceforge CVS, was Re: [Dri-devel] radeon error

2003-09-02 Thread Eric Anholt
and integration between them has been great in p4. If we just want to get rid of sf.net, CVS on freedesktop.org would probably be a good place to go. Plus, then we could set up cvsup, which offers fast checkouts/updates for folks and repository mirroring for developers. -- Eric Anholt

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Re: Sourceforge CVS

2003-09-02 Thread Eric Anholt
love the idea of moving to freedesktop.org right now to deal with the anonymous cvs issue, provide cvsup, and probably a more responsive set of admins. Is there consensus on this? -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt

Re: [Dri-devel] rsync vs anon CVS

2003-09-03 Thread Eric Anholt
. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf

Re: [Dri-devel] SiS DRI status

2003-09-03 Thread Eric Anholt
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 09:06, Keith Whitwell wrote: Eric Anholt wrote: On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 03:47, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: Am Samstag, 30. August 2003 00:02 schrieb Eric Anholt: My current diff is at: http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/sis-14.diff It's against DRI CVS

Re: [Dri-devel] rsync vs anon CVS

2003-09-04 Thread Eric Anholt
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 03:55, Felix Kühling wrote: On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 17:04:59 -0700 Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 01:46, Keith Whitwell wrote: Thomas Emmel wrote: On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:40, Martin Spott wrote: Thomas Emmel [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Dri-devel] SiS DRI status

2003-09-04 Thread Eric Anholt
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 20:45, Eric Anholt wrote: On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 09:06, Keith Whitwell wrote: Eric Anholt wrote: On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 03:47, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: Am Samstag, 30. August 2003 00:02 schrieb Eric Anholt: My current diff is at: http

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: CVS Update: xc (branch: trunk)

2003-09-08 Thread Eric Anholt
On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 07:42, Dieter Nützel wrote: Am Samstag, 6. September 2003 23:29 schrieb Eric Anholt: On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 14:16, Eric Anholt wrote: CVSROOT: /cvs/dri Module name: xc Repository: xc/xc/ Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/09/06 14:16:32

[Dri-devel] headsup on CVS status

2003-09-09 Thread Eric Anholt
tree? -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf

Re: [Dri-devel] Weekly IRC meeting - 3dlabs and savage

2003-09-09 Thread Eric Anholt
in a previous email said the savage driver from S3 was for: Savage MX/IX/ SuperSavage/ ProSavage/ Twister/K -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Dri-devel] Fault in radeon DRM module

2003-09-09 Thread Eric Anholt
to date. dri.freedesktop.org currently contains a snapshot of the repo that was downloaded on September 5th. The move is stalled waiting for cvs.sourceforge.net to get fixed so we can get a snapshot of the repo containing everything that's happened since Sep. 4th. -- Eric Anholt

Re: [Dri-devel] HEADSUP: freedesktop vs sourceforge CVS status

2003-09-13 Thread Eric Anholt
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 05:45, Alan Hourihane wrote: On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 12:19:44PM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote: On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 12:35:30PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: On Fri, 2003-09-12 at 07:22, Ian Romanick wrote: Alan Hourihane wrote: CVSROOT: /cvsroot/dri

Re: [Dri-devel] HEADSUP: freedesktop vs sourceforge CVS status

2003-09-15 Thread Eric Anholt
On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 02:34, Alan Hourihane wrote: On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 04:33:34PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 05:45, Alan Hourihane wrote: On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 12:19:44PM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote: On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 12:35:30PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote

[Dri-devel] HEADSUP: CVS move complete

2003-09-16 Thread Eric Anholt
absolutely terrible, so I'm still checking out the new CVS to make sure things work. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This sf.net email

[Dri-devel] HEADSUP: CVS move in progress

2003-09-16 Thread Eric Anholt
We've got a new tarball. It missed the commits last night, but my plan is to just replicate those commits myself in the new repository, trying to keep history as best I can. I'll give another headsup when it's done. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: [Dri-devel] DRI savage driver status

2003-09-17 Thread Eric Anholt
environment to get more information. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven

Re: [Dri-devel] DRI savage driver status

2003-09-21 Thread Eric Anholt
and the card_common.h in the 2d driver. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek

Re: [Dri-devel] Fault in radeon DRM module

2003-09-24 Thread Eric Anholt
still feel like the SiS DRM could be much smaller, but I haven't thought about it yet. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This sf.net email

Re: [Dri-devel] Kernel back-merge ...

2003-09-25 Thread Eric Anholt
things in trunk in the meantime (I'm thinking of this i830 fix, the BSD fixes you've made)? -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This sf.net

Re: [Dri-devel] Website - Wiki (RFC)

2003-09-25 Thread Eric Anholt
somehow suppress the auto-wikiwording-from-source in specific pages at least, I would put it on dri.sf.net too. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Dri-devel] Kernel back-merge ...

2003-09-26 Thread Eric Anholt
whitespace cleanup came after a bit of initial porting work, which involved axing a bit of dead code and using some os-independence macros. This should cover the functional changes that came after that: http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/sisdrm-functional.diff -- Eric Anholt

[Dri-devel] merging to branches

2003-10-03 Thread Eric Anholt
. It ran for a while, and produced a large number of conflicts. Why should there be conflicts in files that weren't touched by the savage-branch? Is there a way to avoid having to deal with all of those? -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: [Dri-devel] merging to branches

2003-10-03 Thread Eric Anholt
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 13:55, Felix Kühling wrote: On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 12:14:32 -0700 Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, I was going to merge trunk to the savage-1_0_0-branch, since updates to the savage driver in trunk help out with that work I've been Are you referring

Re: [Dri-devel] merging to branches

2003-10-04 Thread Eric Anholt
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 13:55, Felix Kühling wrote: On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 12:14:32 -0700 Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, I was going to merge trunk to the savage-1_0_0-branch, since updates to the savage driver in trunk help out with that work I've been Are you referring

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: CVS Update: xc (branch: trunk)

2003-10-07 Thread Eric Anholt
to the XFree86 repo. Or, you can leave it out and I think the XFree86 folks take care of adding it when it goes into their repo. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Dri-devel] Major mergedFB rework committed to CVS

2003-10-13 Thread Eric Anholt
of differences between Linux and *BSD for 2d in XFree86, I would say. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net

Re: [Dri-devel] Major mergedFB rework committed to CVS

2003-10-14 Thread Eric Anholt
execution. The BSDs offer something similar to linux, I think, but at least there isn't a module for it, so we use the generic emulation. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [Dri-devel] Adding hardware detection to DRI drivers

2003-10-15 Thread Eric Anholt
pretty accurate lists in the BSD DRM I think. I'm going to take a look at integrating your work and making it portable. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [Dri-devel] Adding hardware detection to DRI drivers

2003-10-15 Thread Eric Anholt
going through them now to see how to make them portable, too. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net

RE: [Dri-devel] Adding hardware detection to DRI drivers

2003-10-15 Thread Eric Anholt
On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 14:57, Jon Smirl wrote: --- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If the Linux drivers go to probing PCI IDs, could it also start creating /dev/dri/cardXs which are associated with a specific piece of hardware? The get/set unique thing is a problem, though. It seems

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: More expat problems...

2003-10-15 Thread Eric Anholt
I'm going to commit this. The SiS driver doesn't do texmem. I don't think it needs the texmem objects, and I don't forsee it using the current incarnation of texmem. (not an objection, since the patch is an improvement anyway, but if you're already in the area...) -- Eric Anholt

Re: [Dri-devel] Adding hardware detection to DRI drivers

2003-10-16 Thread Eric Anholt
ioctl thing would be to try to save us needing to add too many new ioctls for smallish changes like these. -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Dri-devel] Adding hardware detection to DRI drivers

2003-10-16 Thread Eric Anholt
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 12:41, Jon Smirl wrote: --- Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm still working on cleaning the PCI ID stuff up to be portable, which I'll commit as soon as I test (I'm trying to get a multihead setup going to see if there are problems with that as Michel Daenzer

Re: [Dri-devel] new 2048 limit code...

2003-10-17 Thread Eric Anholt
in the 3d driver you could fall back to software on grabbing the lock if the width is too large? -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net

[Dri-devel] Re: CVS Update: xc (branch: trunk)

2003-10-19 Thread Eric Anholt
On Sun, 2003-10-19 at 16:35, Eric Anholt wrote: CVSROOT: /cvs/dri Module name: xc Repository: xc/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/bsd/drm/kernel/ Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/10/19 16:35:59 Log message: - SMPng lock the DRM. This is only partial

Re: [Dri-devel] Radeon DRM memory layout transition

2003-10-20 Thread Eric Anholt
to simulate it) -- Eric Anholt[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations Here's your chance to show off your

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >