On 30 Aug 2012, at 20:01, meekerdb wrote:
On 8/29/2012 11:19 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
I might write a longer comment, but I will be a bit busy those days.
Here are some references on the fact that cannabis can cure cancer:
Cannabis selectively target cancerous cell, and makes them auto-
2012/8/31 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
On 30 Aug 2012, at 20:01, meekerdb wrote:
On 8/29/2012 11:19 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
I might write a longer comment, but I will be a bit busy those days.
Here are some references on the fact that cannabis can cure cancer:
Cannabis
On 31 Aug 2012, at 10:44, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2012/8/31 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
On 30 Aug 2012, at 20:01, meekerdb wrote:
On 8/29/2012 11:19 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
I might write a longer comment, but I will be a bit busy those days.
Here are some references on the fact
2012/8/31 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
On 31 Aug 2012, at 10:44, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2012/8/31 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
On 30 Aug 2012, at 20:01, meekerdb wrote:
On 8/29/2012 11:19 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
I might write a longer comment, but I will be a bit busy those
On 31 Aug 2012, at 12:02, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2012/8/31 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
On 31 Aug 2012, at 10:44, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2012/8/31 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
On 30 Aug 2012, at 20:01, meekerdb wrote:
On 8/29/2012 11:19 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
I might write
Yes, but bashing nicotine is also easy. Everybody that surfs internet,
especially posting too much is nicotine freak ;)
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=internet%20addiction%20chrna4
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To
On 31 Aug 2012, at 17:52, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
Yes, but bashing nicotine is also easy. Everybody that surfs
internet, especially posting too much is nicotine freak ;)
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=internet%20addiction%20chrna4
Interesting. If we don't fight
I might write a longer comment, but I will be a bit busy those days.
Here are some references on the fact that cannabis can cure cancer:
Cannabis selectively target cancerous cell, and makes them auto-phage
(eating themselves):
http://www.jci.org/articles/view/37948(original spain
On 8/29/2012 11:19 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
I might write a longer comment, but I will be a bit busy those days.
Here are some references on the fact that cannabis can cure cancer:
Cannabis selectively target cancerous cell, and makes them auto-phage (eating
themselves):
Even Binet, who invented the IQ-tests, insisted that it can be used
only to separate debility and sanity, not to measure small
differences. The paper is mute on the most difficult part to assess,
like such a difference. I am not sure such comparision must be itself
compared with other
I am of the opinion that recreational drugs should be the preserve of the
retired folk.
In fact in the USA with so many companies and the govt/military doing
random testing
you may as well wait until retirement.
Richard
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 2:45 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Hmm like the old geezer with a Porsche, who can't sit in it, because of a
bad back, to compensate for the lifelong frustration of withholding that
pleasure? Enjoy stuff while we can, minimizing harm potential, no matter
how old imho.
I find the study designed to create news hysteria. The authors
On 29 Aug 2012, at 12:37, Richard Ruquist wrote:
I am of the opinion that recreational drugs should be the preserve
of the retired folk.
In fact in the USA with so many companies and the govt/military
doing random testing
you may as well wait until retirement.
I don't believe in drugs.
I really agree with Bruno. In fact my string cosmology is a product of
smoking,
making me a crackpot have a double meaning. But minus the crack
which I have never been interested in. Pot is sufficient but unavailable.
Richard
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
Hear Hear!
On 8/29/2012 10:03 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 29 Aug 2012, at 12:37, Richard Ruquist wrote:
I am of the opinion that recreational drugs should be the preserve of
the retired folk.
In fact in the USA with so many companies and the govt/military doing
random testing
you may as
On 8/29/2012 7:03 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
We know since 1974 that cannabis cures cancer, (american discovery hidden by Bush
senior) but it is only since this has been rediscovered in Spain, that some media talk
about it, but it does not yet make the headline.
How many people died of cancer
2012/8/29 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
On 29 Aug 2012, at 12:37, Richard Ruquist wrote:
I am of the opinion that recreational drugs should be the preserve of the
retired folk.
In fact in the USA with so many companies and the govt/military doing
random testing
you may as well wait
Research on this is ambiguous and ideologically freighted, but you put your
finger on the right spot with: though maybe not as much. Because given
all the toxic compounds from burning carbon based plant matter, the
question is why the smoking cannabis leads to lung cancer evidence is
much more of
People and science do not distinguish enough between smoking pure cannabis
or hemp and smoking both cannabis and tobacco.
The latter carries many more health concerns than the former.
Also the causality: does cannabis lead to depression or is a life framed
for depression at some point, and
As I said *it can* lead to that, when abusing, what cause the abuse is
outside the problem, but occulting the abuse is not good (as all abuse of
any drug legal or not).
And surely it is easier to not abuse when you are rich and have less living
problem than if you're not.
And anyway, abuse of
Agreed. But abuse of anything... is simply abuse.
Talking about consciousness altering alternatives on a plant or chemical
basis, I maintain that evidence, such as the harm assessment reports of
Prof. David Nutt, NIDA studies, papers/sources cited in The Emperor wears
no clothes, suggest that
2012/8/29 Platonist Guitar Cowboy multiplecit...@gmail.com
Agreed. But abuse of anything... is simply abuse.
Wel yes... but abuse is easy with cannabis, if you smoke *everyday* it is
abuse.
And when you smoke everyday, you often smoke more than one... and that
condition *is not* rare among
If you can solve the problem of what degree of involvement/dependence
towards an idea/substance/drug is problematic and which is not, then go
ahead. I will certainly read that book.
Personal anecdotes and hyperbolic stuff is everywhere: e.g. the study that
opened this thread.
Even if I take your
On 8/29/2012 9:02 AM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
Research on this is ambiguous and ideologically freighted, but you put your finger on
the right spot with: though maybe not as much. Because given all the toxic compounds
from burning carbon based plant matter, the question is why the smoking
Brent wrote:
*I can think of no plausible mechanism whereby cannabis could selectively
affect cancer cells.*
*
*Sorry, this is no argument. You (or any later chap) may learn later-on
knowledge beyond our present inventory.
Besides: e.g. *Iodo Uracyl* attacks (cancer-) tumor cells selectively,
On 8/29/2012 2:15 PM, John Mikes wrote:
Brent wrote:
/I can think of no plausible mechanism whereby cannabis could selectively affect cancer
cells./
/
/Sorry, this is no argument. You (or any later chap) may learn later-on knowledge beyond
our present inventory.
And that would be a good
Try a google search for: thc anti cancer
There are numerous articles done by different groups that support this
theory.
Jason
On Aug 29, 2012, at 6:03 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 8/29/2012 2:15 PM, John Mikes wrote:
Brent wrote:
I can think of no plausible mechanism
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
multiplecit...@gmail.com wrote:
Finally we have the whole story and truth:
Direct link to PDF in question:
28 matches
Mail list logo
