Wow, 116 ish posts on this crock of sh1t.
Anyway, Mr Muir deserves some compensation for having to work in Luton
[1]
[1] UK joke...
Rob
MCSE + a, b, c thru to I
MVPE
A+
CNNE
BA (hons)
A-levels
GCSE's
This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to
whom
to Outlook objects
Wow, 116 ish posts on this crock of sh1t.
Anyway, Mr Muir deserves some compensation for having to work in Luton
[1]
[1] UK joke...
Rob
MCSE + a, b, c thru to I
MVPE
A+
CNNE
BA (hons)
A-levels
GCSE's
This email is confidential and intended solely for the use
PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 February 2003 15:00
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Luckily he didn't work in Slough then?[1]
[1] More UK humour.
Cheers
Paul
Standards are like toothbrushes,
everyone wants one but not yours
-Original Message
MVP: Go fix me a turkey pot pie!
-Original Message-
From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 4:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Or a better one from last year... Not direct quotes of
course
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 8:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
I am not and have never said that what MVP's do or do not do is a problem.
The granting of the title MVP and any rewards/compensation that go with it
is itself the problem. Yes, some
.
Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Sandhya Pai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 12:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Hi Greg,
I'm forced to jump in because you are talking about ethics and how
doctors
Moir
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
I'm currently using Outlook Web Access to reply to mail on this list. While I
apologise for any inconvenience this causes, it doesn't seem unreasonable to me to use
an Exchange
kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 6:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Yeah, but you didn't say you weren't! :)
Impugning my personal integrity?[1][2][3]
[1] Ponders recommendation to several people this week of Infonition
software.
[2] Wonders if his statements about the abilities of Herr Deckler to a
customer they met with today should be amended.
[3]
the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 5:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Well, that was how I took
Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 07 February 2003 11:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
And Ed, if I am not mistaken, you are also a Microsoft MVP,
so whose interpretation is unbiased, mine or yours?
I continue to believe my interpretation
some mud at me too?
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20
Sent: 07 February 2003 11:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
=20
=20
And Ed, if I am not mistaken, you are also a Microsoft MVP,=20
so whose
And the Oscar goes to... Greg Deckler!!
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 9:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
My point is that it serves no useful purpose to cast aspersions
, February 07, 2003 9:05 AM
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
My point is that it serves no useful purpose to cast aspersions as to
people's attitudes and motivations because everyone is biased in one way
or another.
I believe that this is really systemic with regards to the problems
Hey Greg I see you are an ONU alumni. How did you like Ada? The
beagle?
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 9:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
My point is that it serves no useful
: Re: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
lol
Thanks for the good laugh.
I have found that the harshest critics of Microsoft products are the MVPS
themselves.
Andy David
Microsoft MVP.
There, is that better?
- Original Message -
From: Greg Deckler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 07 February 2003 14:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
And the other thing that REALLY chaps me is people that cast
aspersions on others without fessing up to their own
Oooh. I should change my sig.
How's this?
Martin Blackstone
MSMVP
Not MCP, MCSENothing else.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 6:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
-Original
, February 07, 2003 9:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
lol
Thanks for the good laugh.
I have found that the harshest critics of Microsoft products are the MVPS
themselves.
Andy David
Microsoft MVP.
There, is that better?
- Original Message -
From
I'm very interested to know what secret compensation he is speaking of.
Deckler, care to elaborate?
-Original Message-
From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 7:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Yeah. You
Me too. Sounds like we've all been missing out.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Fri 07/02/2003 15:24
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
My point is that it serves no useful purpose to cast aspersions as to
people's attitudes and motivations because everyone is biased in one way
or another.
I believe that this is really systemic with regards to the problems
Its a thong with MSFT on the back.
- Original Message -
From: Robert Moir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 10:30 AM
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Me too. Sounds like we've all been missing out.
-Original
m thong backs
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Fri 07/02/2003 15:40
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: Re: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Its a thong
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 7:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Yeah. You should see the developers run whenever Chris starts walking
towards them.
Andy, you forgot to tell me about that direct compensation you get for
being
:
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
So, you are going to tell me that you have never received any sort of
compensation at all for being an MVP. I am talking T-Shirts, plastic toys,
anything and even the TITLE of MVP. If you receive ANY FORM
projects
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 6:43 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
And Ed, if I am not mistaken, you are also a Microsoft MVP, so whose
interpretation is unbiased, mine
You mean the I Grock Spock one?
- Original Message -
From: Schwartz, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 10:21 AM
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Yeah. You should see the developers run whenever Chris starts
AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
So, you are going to tell me that you have never received any sort of
compensation at all for being an MVP. I am talking T-Shirts, plastic toys,
anything and even the TITLE of MVP. If you receive ANY FORM OF
COMPENSATION
Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
So, you are going to tell me that you have never received any sort of
compensation at all for being an MVP. I am talking T-Shirts, plastic toys,
anything and even the TITLE of MVP. If you receive ANY FORM OF COMPENSATION,
it is a conflict of interest
But you could do all that and NOT be an MVP. So why do you cherish it so?
Is it ego?
Oh please. I have things from vendors all over my desk. F5, Zones, Quest,
Printer Ribbons Plus, MS, Dell, Compaq, Jack in the Box, etc. None of this
stuff had nothing to do with being an MVP. I also don't do
: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 10:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
So, you are going to tell me that you have never received any sort of
compensation at all for being an MVP. I am talking T-Shirts, plastic toys
I think someone needs a hug.
- Original Message -
From: Greg Deckler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 11:29 AM
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
And everyone could do everything that they do now in terms of helping
plonk
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 11:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
And everyone could do everything that they do now in terms of helping people
WITHOUT the MVP status. So
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 6:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
My point is that it serves
]] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 7:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
So, you are going to tell me that you have never received any sort of
compensation at all for being an MVP. I am talking T-Shirts, plastic
toys, anything and even the TITLE
Blackstone
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 8:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Oh please. I have things from vendors all over my desk. F5, Zones,
Quest, Printer Ribbons Plus, MS, Dell, Compaq, Jack in the Box, etc.
None of this stuff had nothing to do with being
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
But you could do all that and NOT be an MVP. So why do you cherish it
so? Is it ego?
Oh please. I have things from vendors all over my desk. F5, Zones,
Quest, Printer Ribbons Plus, MS, Dell, Compaq, Jack in the Box, etc.
None
Leggo my Eggo!
- Original Message -
From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 11:51 AM
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
You're one to talk about ego!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
Look who's talking
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 8:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
You're one to talk about ego!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 10:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
So, you are going to tell me that you have never received any sort of
compensation at all for being an MVP
I cant. I'm counting my secret MVP money.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 8:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Leggo my Eggo!
- Original Message -
From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL
A.
Did little Chris get a snow day off from school?
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 11:53 AM
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Look who's talking
-Original
be the first to admit
that too.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 8:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
But you could do all that and NOT be an MVP. So why do you cherish it so?
Is it ego
Titles? Big problem? Nah?
My full title is Devine Master of the Entire Universe and I've never had a
problem with that.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 07 February, 2003 17:29
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Titles? Big problem? Nah?
My full title is Devine Master of the Entire Universe and I've never had
a problem with that.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 07 February, 2003 17:29
To: Exchange
: Friday, February 07, 2003 8:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Look who's talking
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 8:52 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
Thread quickly lengthens
The snow falls, deep on 9th Street
BBQ time, Deaned.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 6:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
My point is that it serves
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 12:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
You're missing the point Ed. Any form of compensation is a conflict of
interest. Period.
Nice absolute
as a huge problem, in IT it is not.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 12:55 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
You're missing the point Ed. Any form of compensation is a conflict
To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
I'm not sure how this refutes anything along these lines.
Going to a trade show and picking up a freebie is one thing. Accepting a
title and accepting continued compensation is quite another
At: Friday, February 07, 2003 12:30 PM
Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
Conversation: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
I'm not sure how this refutes anything along these lines.
Going to a trade show and picking up a freebie is one thing. Accepting
Greg Deckler wrote:
So, you are going to tell me that you have never received any sort of
compensation at all for being an MVP. I am talking T-Shirts, plastic
toys, anything and even the TITLE of MVP. If you receive ANY FORM OF
COMPENSATION, it is a conflict of interest. Plain and simple. Ask
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
I'm not sure how this refutes anything along these lines.
Going to a trade show and picking up a freebie is one thing. Accepting a
title and accepting continued compensation is quite another. There is no
relationship implied
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 1:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
I'm not sure how this refutes anything along these lines.
Going to a trade show and picking up a freebie
: Friday, February 07, 2003 2:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
This is exactly what I am talking about. Certifications in our industry
are based around vendors and their tools. I get Microsoft certified.
But that is meaningless. Imagine the corollary
Discussions
Cc:
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Everthing in IT is not vendor based. Just off the top of my head
A+ Certification
SANS GIAC
CISSP
These are all certifications
Man. It does not matter how you view yourself, it is a matter of how
others perceive you. Military, doctors, lawyers, engineers, etc. are held
in much higher regard in society than the computer guy. Why? The reason
this is the case is because these are viewed as professions whereas the
computer
: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Man. It does not matter how you view yourself, it is a matter of how others perceive
you. Military, doctors, lawyers, engineers, etc. are held in much higher regard in
society than the computer guy. Why? The reason this is the case is because these are
viewed
, 2003 2:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
This is exactly what I am talking about. Certifications in our industry are based
around vendors and their tools. I get Microsoft certified. But that is meaningless.
Imagine the corollary, a doctor gets certified
Plus the last thing in the world I want is too be compared to a lawyer.
-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Time to Chime in because I disagree
PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Man. It does not matter how you view yourself, it is a matter of how =
others perceive you. Military, doctors, lawyers, engineers, etc. are =
held in much higher regard in society than the computer guy. Why? The =
reason
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Time to Chime in because I disagree with some of the statements below:
You say that Doctors, lawyers, and engineers do not get Certified in things
like The Purple Pill well that may be so but Doctors, lawyers and
engineers do specialize in different
: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
The only difference between us and lawyers is that lawyers have ethics.
Plus the last thing in the world I want is too be compared to a
lawyer.
-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 11:49 AM
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 1:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
The only difference between us and lawyers is that lawyers have ethics.
Plus the last thing in the world I want is too be compared to a lawyer.
-Original Message
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
The only difference between us and lawyers is that lawyers have ethics.
Plus the last thing in the world I want is too be compared to a lawyer.
-Original Message-
From: Joshua R. Morgan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday
Yes! Well said! Kudos to you
-Original Message-
From: Rachel Pickens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 11:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Personal integrity cannot be imposed through rules and ritualized conduct.
PERIOD
lawyers do you know?
Ethics is personal not Professional
Joshua Morgan
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]=20
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 2:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 12:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Man. It does not matter how you view yourself, it is a matter of how
others perceive you. Military, doctors, lawyers, engineers, etc. are held
07/02/2003 19:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
This is exactly the attitude that I am talking about.
.+-¦-xm¶ÿÃ ,Â)Ür¿ë(º· ýì\
öªÙÈb½ë!¶Úÿ 0³
§ÊþÈzÇȱæ«r¬¥:.Ë
?
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 11:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
The only difference between us and lawyers is that lawyers have ethics.
Plus the last thing in the world I
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
There is no other way to say this except that you are wrong. Lawyers have
written-down ethics that they must follow or face the consequences. These
ethics are NOT personal, they are the ethics of the profession. Go talk to
a lawyer
I bet I can guess what the subject of the next email I receive from this
list will be!
-Original Message-
From: Parrett, Sue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 3:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
According to Merriam
Haven't seen the majority of your messages because they come through like
this.
SXRzIGhhcmQgdG8gdGVsbCB3aGF0IHlvdSBhcmUgdGFsa2luZyBhYm91dC4gRXZlcnkgdGltZSBz
b21lb25lIHNheXMgc29tZXRoaW5nIHlvdSBjYW4ndCByZWZ1dGUsIHlvdSBjaGFuZ2UgeW91ciBh
I second that
Greg Householder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 3:06 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Oh my GOD!
you guy's still beating this dead horse
Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Personal integrity cannot be imposed through rules and ritualized conduct.
PERIOD!
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 1:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
Microsoft MVP.
M MVP
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 6:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
lol
Thanks for the good laugh.
I have found that the harshest critics
Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 9:05 AM
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
My point is that it serves no useful purpose to cast
aspersions as to
people's attitudes and motivations because everyone is
biased in one
way or another
Robert Moir
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 3:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Haven't seen the majority of your messages because they come
through like
Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 7:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
So, you are going to tell me that you have never received any sort of
compensation at all for being an MVP. I am talking T-Shirts, plastic
toys, anything
Yea. The cops. Especially with all those kids around.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Schorr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 1:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Indeed. I didn't know what an MVP was when they first
Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 3:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
This proves my point. These discussions take place in private, not
public.
Big time. You should have been in the room with the Outlook MVPs
Blackstone
Microsoft MVP.
M MVP
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 6:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
lol
Thanks for the good laugh.
I have found
clients
- Original Message -
From: Greg Deckler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 4:04 PM
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
This proves my point. These discussions take place in private, not public.
Big time. You
We work with lawyers all the time.
So do I.
We even host partner
companies on our Exchange server for free. The lawyers that
we work with FORCE us to bill them because they cannot
ethically accept this service for free. It creates a conflict
of interest for them. Our IT partners have
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
This proves my point. These discussions take place in private, not
public.
Big time. You should have been in the room with the Outlook MVPs and
the Outlook Dev guys last Summit talking about the new security
features. I feared lives would be lost
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Any company that would sit out in the parking lot with the public hanging
around while they decided the direction of their products would be idiots.
Why must you look at MVP's as MS lackies? Why cant you look at them as
advocates for the public? You have heard
be unethical of you, I'm sure thatâs not the case.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Fri 07/02/2003 21:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 11:44 AM
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
Man. It does not matter how you view yourself, it is a matter of how
others perceive you. Military, doctors, lawyers, engineers, etc. are held
in much
Certified Solutions Provider. We
are happy to have Microsoft as a partner in bringing solutions to our
clients
- Original Message -
From: Greg Deckler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 4:04 PM
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook
I am not and have never said that what MVP's do or do not do is a problem.
The granting of the title MVP and any rewards/compensation that go with it
is itself the problem. Yes, some MVP's have posted some critical comments.
Who cares? The problem is the fact that MVP's exist in the first place.
, thanks for the input. We will look into it.
MVP: Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 3:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
This proves my point. These discussions take place
Ah yes, of course. It is all clear now. Thanks Robert.
SSdtIGN1cnJlbnRseSB1c2luZyBPdXRsb29rIFdlYiBBY2Nlc3MgdG8gcmVwbHkgdG8gbWFpbCBv
biB0aGlzIGxpc3QuIFdoaWxlIEkgYXBvbG9naXNlIGZvciBhbnkgaW5jb252ZW5pZW5jZSB0aGlz
IGNhdXNlcywgaXQgZG9lc24ndCBzZWVtIHVucmVhc29uYWJsZSB0byBtZSB0byB1c2UgYW4gRXhj
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 3:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
I am not and have never said that what MVP's do or do not do
is a problem.
MVP's are the worst of this lot. They secretly get direct compensation from
You're absolutely right, I let my emotions get the better of me. I am
deeply embarassed that I allowed myself to be drawn in to this
conversation. I apologize.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 3:10 PM
To: Exchange
and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 12:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
OK, I thought I had this problem licked until I hit
What exactly is your point in all of this? To be honest, I can't follow
any line of reasoning or an actual point to this post. You seem to be
complaining a lot about something, but I am not sure exactly what it is.
There's lots of sarcasm in the post, which seems to be a substitute for
actual
My point was that this is the straw that breaks the camels back. First my
application written for DOS 3.22 stops working on Windows X, then they
change core OS functionality like the ability to create an Outlook://
shortcut on the desktop. I say it's time to switch to Linux and Samsung
Contact.
and Bricked Backups!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 7:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Shortcuts to Outlook objects
My point was that this is the straw that breaks the camels back
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
