If your whole Exchange org is ready to go native, then yes you can start to
take it out. You'll need to remove the SRS before you can remove the config
connection agreement and consequently uninstall the ADC itself. I'd dig
around for the Technet articles/whitepapers on this before you do
You need to think about using a tool like the ADMT (Active Directory
Migration Tool) to bring across the users original NT4 SID into the
SidHistory of his AD account which will then give access to the mailbox via
the original 55 assoc-nt-account
Once you have done this, you can run a
In the FAQ.
(we've used Mimesweeper for SMTP to good effect for this)
-Original Message-
From: Wong, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 August 2001 19:23
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Using imsext.dll but looking for an alternative or some suggestio
ns
Good morning to some
Robert/phillip
There was a whole thread on these subjects which may have some answers for
you. Run a search in the archives for the subject line: -
Active Directory Connector - Question
Rgrds
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 August 2001
Don't use the Exchange Server link, scroll down the first page a bit and use
the Site Search field in the left hand column.
[it is a bit clunky not being able to search particular lists]
-Original Message-
From: Bare, Ronald A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 August 2001 16:41
To:
: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 11:09 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Active Directory Connector - Question
Using the ADC to mail-enable existing objects is not something
I've done in
practice since we used the ADC to actually create objects.
However
Where did you set the permissions?
Via ESM, Outlook, IFS (explorer) or http?
-Original Message-
From: Vicki Ewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 August 2001 00:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Sharing contact files
I am trying to share several contact files in the Public
I've heard of people using a tool called rlquiked to do this but have not
seen it in action. Editing dll's is never going to be fun you'd only have
to redo it with every service pack.
Better to go for something like SRM for Exchange (from Highground I think)
or devise your own warning system
Are all the ADC connection agreements two-way is the config connection
agreement running ok?
-Original Message-
From: Duane Purcell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 August 2001 05:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Problems sending email from E2K to E5.5 in same Exchange Site
The Resource Kit has trust testing utilities (nltest or netdom I think).
-Original Message-
From: Bryan, Chad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 August 2001 14:59
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook prompts for User Info
The Exchange server is in a separate Domain and the
Could there be a real-time (file-level) virus-scanning service kicking in as
soon as they are created and preventing them being released for deletion by
the indexing service in time?
-Original Message-
From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 August 2001 23:58
To: Exchange
OWA 2000 can not access PFs on 55 servers so if they use OWA much it could
be a problem (unless you set the 55 box as their front-end server for OWA)
Ensure that you run an IS/DS adjust to remove unknown permissions from both
PFs and mailboxes prior to the moves you have a good chance of
Why not just install the W2K server as a member server of the NT4 domain?
If your users are still going to authenticate with their NT4 accounts then
the dcpromo/active directory bit is totally unnecessary over-complicates
the situation.
If you do want them to start using active directory to
Use OSTs. As long as the Exchange server is backed up, you have a back up
so no need to backup the OST separately.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 September 2001 09:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recommendations for .pst file
10mb/min between servers on the same subnet (100mb ethernet) during working
hours on busy lan. So approx 6Gb/hour. This was done with just one admin
session running Users Computers. Compaq 5500 to Compaq DL580 both dual
processor with RAID 5 IS.
Between Exchange 5.5 servers we found that the
Do you have an autoreply set up or is this happening when one of the users
with send-as permissions replies to a mail? If an autoreply, how was the
rule created and with what client?
Also how many replicas of the PFs do you have and across how many
routing/admin groups?
Does it happen with
Are you saying that Active Directory has been set up? Sounds like you'd be
best off demoting them and leaving them as members of the original NT4
domain. Perhaps install a cheap desktop pc as a BDC if you require one.
If you really are going down the AD route, then yes you will need to
This is ridiculous! I have just had my last message rejected as being a
Vbscript virus because it had the phrase Outlook Application in the plain
text message body. The entire log file was also included in the message
sent to me which surely is not a good idea.
Anyone else set up Mailsweeper
files...but um...not to that level! And no, I didn't include the log
file in the inform message!
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 07 September 2001 13:49
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: VBS Blocking
Subject: VBS
...not to that level! And no, I didn't include the log file
in the inform message!
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 07 September 2001 13:49
Posted To: Exchange Mailing List
Conversation: VBS Blocking
Subject: VBS Blocking
This is ridiculous! I have
How about all 20,000 users data on a (mirrored) SAN that is also hosting the
OS, so that the actual servers need only have a pair for the swap file. As
soon as a server goes belly-up, just flick on another one that boots off the
same LUN in the SAN?
I expect you could actually script this to
that is running SQL 7 on it.
Jack
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 7:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: Authentication
Are you saying that Active Directory has been set up? Sounds like you'd be
best off
Imccopy.exe?
This is one of the \support\utilities on the install cd for 55. check the
service pack cd for an updated version though.
Best to have two admin sessions running side by side and do it all by hand
though so that you are double-checking all the entries and rethinking the
logic
Yes, but only when our DNS admins were doing what they were told and when!
Also research anyone or any server that may be using host or lmhost files.
-Original Message-
From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 September 2001 14:35
To: Exchange Discussions
They all work on the PSTexport-delete-recreate-PSTimport basis but just
automate it with a nice GUI. I'd investigate the exmerge utility first of
all.
-Original Message-
From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 September 2001 14:55
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
from container to container
Where do I find the exmerge utility? Do you know of any products that have
the GUI interface?
Mike Mitchell
eMAIL Systems Administrator
Alverno Information Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(317) 532-7800 ext. 6211
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto
Sounds like you've installed it into the existing site (which is a perfectly
valid thing to do).
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 September 2001 18:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Installing Exch2k into Exch55
All,
I'm trying to
John,
I'd go rapidly to www.exinternals.com and read up on Exchange 2000;
particularly the following paper at the moment -
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/administration/2000/Ex2000SETUP.
doc
There are also many excellent whitepapers on other aspects of Exchange 2000.
N.B. the
Why not just export the whole thing to a PST and send it to him on a CD?
Mark
(and yes I know you can't read a PST directly on a CD-ROM)
-Original Message-
From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 September 2001 12:34
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Listing
It seems to be possible to create a second RUS on the same exchange server
pointing to a different DC. If you set them to have update schedules that do
not conflict this may achieve your goal. However I have not tested this
configuration so can not verify it at all.
mark
-Original
a user while the DC where the original Recipient Update
Policy were pointing is done, and not. It was not working even if we created
manually a RUP pointing to the other DC (1st one )
JF
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Harford
Sent
Sounds like he said they are in the same Org though doesn't say if they are
in the same 5.5 site.
John - What clients are being used have you tried eliminating the
formatting issue by setting it all to plain text or maybe using OWA to open
the mail?
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Ed
15MB! In my experience, this just forces people to use PSTs - unless they
are very well trained in sending shortcuts and Public Folders. We currently
allow 120MB and are planning to increase this when we fully roll out E2K
(poss with a SAN at the back end)
Luis - you could always investigate
PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 4:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC Problem
Sounds like he said they are in the same Org though doesn't say if they are
in the same 5.5
I find that this setting is remembered between sessions if I log out without
closing down ADUC first. Have you tried this? It seems to work when
running ADUC on a DC in a TS session as well.
Rgrds
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21
Search technet for mbinfo
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 October 2001 16:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Header file
What about the script file that allowed you to get the size of the user's
mailboxes. Can someone send me
No laughing matter - we were running two here until last year. (spares were
a bit tricky to get hold of!)
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 October 2001 23:00
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K
PDP-11.
Ed Crowley
Compaq
It does sound v.slow - I think we'd need to know what hardware, what raid
controllers, is it across the network, etc, etc to see why.
Of course if your figure includes BLBs then we all know why.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 October
If the folders were permissioned with dlists then these team leaders would
only need to edit the dlists and not the PF permissions directly.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 October 2001 09:22
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Ex 5.5
He has a good point - it's not that detailed if you really want to know the
inner workings. And no disrespect to Tony, but unless there's been a new
version out recently, it's also getting out-of-date.
Go to the www.exinternals.com site and print out the whitepapers that
interest you. These
Turn on the advanced view in ADUC to view the Microsoft Exchange System
Objects container which sits under the domain node. This is where the
directory objects created by the PF CA sit.
Rgrds
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Mike Putley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 October 2001
Title: API for Instant Messaging?
I've dug around on the MSDN site but had no luck so far in searching a method to IM-enable a user programmatically at the time of creation.
We would like to script the process for IM-enabling a user object and dictate what that IM address will be rather
Anything happen to the pfadmin article?
The utility pulls out information on 99% of the PFs that we have in our
site, but not quite all. Therefore I'm interested to know what the
implications of some of the errors seen in the pfinfo.log are.
They fall into three categories:-
Error getting
Excellent!
Ta very much
Mark Harford | Exchange 2000 Project
BBC Technology | DSD
T: +44(0)20 7765 0668 M: +44(0)7801 912974
http://www.bbctechnology.com
-Original Message-
From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 October 2001 13:08
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject
Try my usual link for when the MS site doesn't give up the answers easily -
www.exinternals.com. V.good whitepapers section.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 October 2001 15:45
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exch2K Install - No
Another good one is to let your IS and/or logfile space run out very rapidly
from a mail loop (use blat or the reskit simulation tools for the loop).
See if you really can get that server back up and running with some extra
disks within your SLA period the mail loop cleared up before it goes
Active folders from C2C may help.
-Original Message-
From: Treacy, Ray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 October 2001 15:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Question regarding attachment utilities
Hi,
I am interested in finding a utility that can do the following:
- search an
Does OWA for 5.5 use CDO? I ask as we have had some users experience this
type of calendar corruption recently and the only common factor we can find
is that the problem occurred after they had been using OWA also that their
Exchange servers had been upgraded to SP4 in the last month or so.
Does the account you are logged on with have a mailbox itself? This is
necessary to administer PFs.
mark
-Original Message-
From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 November 2001 15:38
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Error When Expanding Public Folders in System
And in English?
CAs are between (containers in) 55 Sites and (OUs in) AD Domains whereas you
appear to be referring to Sites when you may mean Domains and vice-versa.
Rephrase it logically and we'll see what we can do!
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL
Since you already have the MS licenses, could you have a totally separate
standby forest configured with just a couple of DC/GCs and one E2K box
with very strict mailbox limits? Presumably it's not a breach of licensing
to have standby/recovery servers so you are just stretching that point a
OWA 2000?
It's possible that some of the cybercafes had firewalls that claim to pass
http1.1, but in fact do not do it properly. This results in your being able
to get into OWA but then not see messages in the Inbox (amongst other
things). The simplest solution seems to be to ensure that your
Schedule Plus used to do this ok! I remember complaints about this issue
when we moved everyone to using Outlook.
Try www.slipstick.com.
Mark H
x50668
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 November 2001 15:38
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
AFAIK the 4.5 client doesn't yet support E2K IM.
Regarding your other problem, you don't say where you have got to in the
setup. Have you defined an IM home server yet or just installed the
service? If installed did you accept the default of the FQDN for the home
server DNS setting or have you
I do apologize for being so vague.
I do have all the below setup. I have a small test setup with W2K and E2K
and an XP client. The only errors I see are in the
%WinDir%\System32\logfiles dir are 501 errors.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday
Title: Message
To
find the ambiguous proxy, try running acsvde export of the AD with the
email addresses attribute included then manipulate it in Access or Excel
to find the duplicate.
As for
the latter issue, are your mailbox CAs two-way also replicating
deletions? I'd initially try a
Title: Message
Trusts? don't rely on transitive trusts if the 55 user is on an NT4
domain. E2K will be trying to resolve the 55 users mailbox to an NT ACE
therefore the 55 users NT account must be the primary account and from a domain
that bothW2K users domains trust.
not
sure if i've got
Service
Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM
Global Services DDI:
01256 752845 Mobile:
07974 111867 Fax:
01256 754899 Email:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
Message-From: Mark Harford
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:04P
MTo:
Exchange
DiscussionsSubject: RE
Try the dsadiag.exe utility as well from www.exinternals.com
Also did you reboot SERVER1 after enabling it as a GC? Exchange needs you
to do this.
Mark H
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 November 2001 18:11
To: Exchange Discussions
What does the synchronisation log say (you'll find this in the users deleted
items or their dumpster if they clear out deleted items)?
Also have you or any other Exchange admins for other Admin Groups made any
changes to the Organizational Forms set up recently? You should check what
Exchange offline address book
07:50:130X8004010F
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Harford
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 3:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OST synchronizing problems
What does the synchronisation
Check both the permissions paper the exchange installation/setup
whitepaper at www.exinternals.com. You will need to establish a recipients
connection.
Mark H
x50668
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 November 2001 16:56
To: Exchange
Could you send this type of thing to the list server rather than to me
directly?
I know the 55FE/2KBE works ok in a mixed 55/2000 environment but have no
experience of it in a native E2K environment.
A better alternative is to force the use of the reach OWA 2000 client.
Either get your ISP
I'd check out the GC that it's using. It may be worth running dsadiag to
force the re-discovery of a GC/DC.
Mark H
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 November 2001 14:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mail Flow within same Storage Group
MSDN is usually good for this type of thing
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnmes2k/ht
ml/secroles.asp?frame=true
Mark H
-Original Message-
From: Henrik Andersson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 December 2001 18:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Do you have any AV software on the test box as well?
We'll be testing it in a lab with Sybari (in either mode) next week but
other experience would be useful.
[Also of course any updates to the ADC code effects in a mixed environment
might be critical.]
cheers
Mark
-Original
But was it in a mixed 55/2000 environment or a native E2000 environment? I
can understand it in the former but am concerned about the latter. If in
the former setup it would also be cleared up by a DS/IS adjust to remove
unknown PF permissions (this does not exist in native E2K mode).
Paul
www.exinternals.com
Check out the whitepapers on best configuration and installation/setup in
particular to actually set up the system.
You can then use and test your setup in conjunction with reading the books
mentioned by others.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 2:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Closing Microsoft Case
But was it in a mixed 55/2000 environment or a native E2000 environment? I
can understand it in the former but am concerned about the latter
Exmerge?
-Original Message-
From: BY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 December 2001 13:18
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: A Script to Archive Mailboxes
Hi group,
I have lots of old mailbox data need to be archived as PST data before
deleting them from Exchange Server? Do you
Easier to rehome them than to recreate. If you bring up your second ADC
whilst the first is still running then on the General Tab of each agreement
you can change the server that that CA runs on. You will be prompted to
retype in the connection username/password.
If you are really concerned
You really need to give us a load more info. Is it part of an existing
Ex5.5 set up with an ADC in place? Did you use the ADMT or a third-party
equivalent to migrate the users? Etc, etc.
Mark
Briefly though, you'll need to add the NT4 accounts into the mailbox
permissions of the
If there is an SRS service running on your upgraded server then you could
try attaching to that server using Exchange 55 Admin and deleting the
directory entry for the phantom server from there. This would be part of
the normal process for removing the last 55 server in a mixed site/admin
group.
Another product is SRM from Highground which has now been bought out by Sun.
http://www.sun.com/storage/software/storage_mgmt/srm_exchange/index.html
More sophisticated than Active Folders if I remember correctly but also more
expensive.
Regards
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Ramsay,
Did you use any NT4 to AD migration tools? E.g. ADMT or third-party
equivalents.
Some of them will overwrite the AD display name with the NT4 Full Name.
This may be the source of Clayton GDY.
Rgrds
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Clayton GDY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 January
then it's fine.
It's effecting all folders
Thanks for your thoughts.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public Folder Permissions Vanish
How are you making the change - via
Vanish
Well I am, but have always been. Your comment is interesting, do you have
any information about why being an enterprise admin fouls this up. Sounds
amazing
Thanks
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:47 AM
~DEL can be used to remove data from specific fields in the user
properties. It certainly works for the directory import approach/
-Original Message-
From: Aarts, Jan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 January 2002 09:28
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchg 5.5 ADSI Scripting
Sounds right to me. We have ten or so sites and initially all Connection
Agreements (covering all ten sites) attached to just one Exchange 55 Server
in the main hub site. Obviously 9 out of the 10 CAs could only be one-way
agreements but it worked just fine. The E2K users in the main hub
From the old exinternals Permissions Guide...
To create a CCA
Technically, you need to have the following permissions:
* Read on the CN=Microsoft Exchange,CN=Services,CN=Configuration,
DC=your-domain-here object
* Full control on the CN=Active Directory Connections,CN=Microsoft
With only one Public Store per TLH allowed in a cluster are you attaching to
the right server?
Might be worth checking the legacyexchangedn value in ldp or adsiedit and
double checking that it matches up with the server correctly.
Also can we assume that all appropriate users can access PFs on
And the great thing about IM is that it does not fill up our lovely exchange
servers with trivia! He'd only be abusing emails otherwise.
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 30 January 2002 22:46
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Restriciting use
1) You'll need ESM installed on the second DC to view the Exchange
Attributes in ADUC.
2) prior to running the upgrade, could you see the 55 server in the
configuration naming context container in AD? A config connection agreement
will need to be running for this info to replicate into AD and an
If you're concerned about getting the exact syntax correct just paste the
full CN out of ADSIEDIT. I generally use notepad to set up a small batch
file (save as *.cmd) that I can then type in the full csvde or ldifde syntax
and play around with it.
-Original Message-
From: Bryon Barkley
You could try the mbinfo utility (I'd get the latest version from PSS).
-Original Message-
From: Marc Mearns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 February 2002 16:45
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Identifying how much space is being taken up by deleted items and
deleted mailboxes.
Have you created an RUS for the child domain?
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 March 2002 17:42
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Child Domains and account creation
Just remembered that I did not run domainprep on the child domain prior to
MOM or NetIQ perhaps?
And are you really referring to Active Directory in your first question?
You could use replmon from the W2K Support Tools/Reskit to check replication
between AD Domain Controllers. Also if you dig around on the E2K CD you'll
find a utility called E2KDSInteg that scans
Or try something like http://www.wickett.net/WNMailKeeper/ which will allow
you to archive to CD-ROM and read/search from CD-ROM. Quite cheap as well.
-Original Message-
From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 07 March 2002 12:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Burning
I'd be interested to know if you have had a chance to test this yet as we
also have an application that requires MDAC2.6 or later to go on our NT4
servers. [it's the Bindview Migration re-permissioning agent btw)
I'll probably check it out next week if you can wait.
-Original Message-
It is possible to change this behaviour. For Exchange 5.5 check out Q215335
For Exchange 2000, there is a setting within ESM for Maintain per-user read
and unread information for this folder
However we also use the Flag Status option here successfully. It gets round
the issue of people with a
In a multi-Site environment you may wish to ensure that they are replicated
to at least one server in every Site or ensure that there is affinity (and a
decent link) between the Sites. It would also be worth replicating them to
servers close to all users. Otherwise I am not aware of any
Makes efficient use of Multicast for multi-user sessions. (in fact it is a
good business driver to get multicast enabled on your network)
The administrator can control use of bandwidth rather than leaving it to
local user settings on Netmeeting. Again the multicast component helps
dramatically
Are you able to install Exchange System Manager by itself? If so, drill
down to the relevant Administrative Group and pull up the properties. In
there you can reselect the Exchange 55 Service Account details that will
have been stored in Active Directory the first time you tried installing
Only unsupported methods - Q273478
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 March 2002 23:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forest and Domain Prep for Exch2k
Is there anyway of undoing what Forestprep domainprep do to
AD? i.e.
All,
We have a requirement to remove the ADC-Global-Names attribute from all
40,000 PF objects in one of our Exchange 55 Sites. However this is proving
somewhat tricky to do. A conventional directory import/export is not up to
the job due to not being able to export hidden public folder
Remember that the software compression achieved by C2C will negate some of
the hardware compression achieved by your backup device. Therefore if one
of your business drivers for compression software is lack of space on tape,
then C2C won't help. Also any AV software will have to decompress,
I'll withdraw that last para! Just found that I can not use UPN in a
frontend/backend OWA situation (basic authentication turned on only). I too
would be interested to know if we can circumvent this.
Rgrds
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford
Sent: 25 March 2002 14:54
Sounds like you might be better restoring the priv and pubs alone. Then run
an IS/DS adjust to create the mailbox objects.
Or just do a directory export of the current Site to csv, massage the csv
with the new home server name and with whatever other changes you want,
re-import it onto your
Could you not create a child domain that is Native?
-Original Message-
From: Neil Hobson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26 March 2002 08:19
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: ADC Public Folders
The ADC is hard coded to create a Universal Distribution
Group, so this is
-Original Message-
From: Mark Harford
Sent: 25 March 2002 14:54
To: 'Exchange Discussions'
Subject: RE: OWA access
Not sure I follow. The user account is in the child
domain whilst
the mailbox data belonging to that account is on a server in the
parent
1 - 100 of 193 matches
Mail list logo
