RE: ADC Question

2001-08-17 Thread Mark Harford
If your whole Exchange org is ready to go native, then yes you can start to take it out. You'll need to remove the SRS before you can remove the config connection agreement and consequently uninstall the ADC itself. I'd dig around for the Technet articles/whitepapers on this before you do though

RE: E2k migration permissions question

2001-08-17 Thread Mark Harford
You need to think about using a tool like the ADMT (Active Directory Migration Tool) to bring across the users original NT4 SID into the SidHistory of his AD account which will then give access to the mailbox via the original 55 assoc-nt-account Once you have done this, you can run a repermission

RE: Using imsext.dll but looking for an alternative or some sugge stio ns

2001-08-17 Thread Mark Harford
In the FAQ. (we've used Mimesweeper for SMTP to good effect for this) -Original Message- From: Wong, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 August 2001 19:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Using imsext.dll but looking for an alternative or some suggestio ns Good morning to some an

RE: ADC connector setup

2001-08-17 Thread Mark Harford
Robert/phillip There was a whole thread on these subjects which may have some answers for you. Run a search in the archives for the subject line: - "Active Directory Connector - Question" Rgrds Mark -Original Message- From: Robert Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 August 200

RE: ADC connector setup

2001-08-17 Thread Mark Harford
Don't use the Exchange Server link, scroll down the first page a bit and use the Site Search field in the left hand column. [it is a bit clunky not being able to search particular lists] -Original Message- From: Bare, Ronald A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 August 2001 16:41 To: E

RE: ADC connector setup

2001-08-17 Thread Mark Harford
al Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Active Directory Connector - Question Using the ADC to mail-enable existing objects is not something I've done in practice since we used the ADC to actually

RE: Sharing contact files

2001-08-22 Thread Mark Harford
Where did you set the permissions? Via ESM, Outlook, IFS (explorer) or http? -Original Message- From: Vicki Ewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 August 2001 00:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Sharing contact files I am trying to share several contact files in the Public Fold

RE: MTA Stack Install

2001-08-22 Thread Mark Harford
Sounds like you have Standard not Enterprise Edition. -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 August 2001 14:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MTA Stack Install Sorry, yes I am using 5.5. I don't know if they setup X.400 connector or not. I

RE: Over limits message

2001-08-22 Thread Mark Harford
I've heard of people using a tool called rlquiked to do this but have not seen it in action. Editing dll's is never going to be fun & you'd only have to redo it with every service pack. Better to go for something like SRM for Exchange (from Highground I think) or devise your own warning system

RE: Sharing contact files

2001-08-23 Thread Mark Harford
One thing to try. Run up Exchange System Manager Go to your Admin Group Expand the Folders Tree Expand the Public Folders Tree Right-click the Contacts Public Folder and select properties Select the permissions tab Hold down the Ctrl key and click the Client Permissions button This will give th

RE: Mailbox Creation/Deletion

2001-08-23 Thread Mark Harford
Have the logging level for the Directory Access object of the Directory Service set to maximum. This means that any change to an object in the directory will be logged with an event. The event is always from MSExchangeDS with ID number 1172. The User is the NT login ID of the user who made the c

RE: Problems sending email from E2K to E5.5 in same Exchange Site

2001-08-24 Thread Mark Harford
Are all the ADC connection agreements two-way & is the config connection agreement running ok? -Original Message- From: Duane Purcell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 August 2001 05:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems sending email from E2K to E5.5 in same Exchange Site

RE: Outlook prompts for User Info

2001-08-28 Thread Mark Harford
The Resource Kit has trust testing utilities ("nltest" or "netdom" I think). -Original Message- From: Bryan, Chad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 August 2001 14:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook prompts for User Info The Exchange server is in a separate Domain and th

RE: Problems sending email from E2K to E5.5 in same Exchange Site

2001-08-29 Thread Mark Harford
eated based on the default recipient policy? I applied the default recipient policy but still no addresses appear - the addresses are in there for the mailbox which was moved to E2k. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Harford Sent: F

RE: E2K full-text indexing

2001-08-29 Thread Mark Harford
Could there be a real-time (file-level) virus-scanning service kicking in as soon as they are created and preventing them being released for deletion by the indexing service in time? -Original Message- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 August 2001 23:58 To: Exchange D

RE: migrating from 5.5 to e2k (public folders)

2001-08-29 Thread Mark Harford
OWA 2000 can not access PFs on 55 servers so if they use OWA much it could be a problem (unless you set the 55 box as their front-end server for OWA) Ensure that you run an IS/DS adjust to remove unknown permissions from both PFs and mailboxes prior to the moves & you have a good chance of avoidi

RE: Move Exchange 5.5 mail boxes and public forlders to a Window s 2k Server

2001-08-31 Thread Mark Harford
Why not just install the W2K server as a member server of the NT4 domain? If your users are still going to authenticate with their NT4 accounts then the dcpromo/active directory bit is totally unnecessary & over-complicates the situation. If you do want them to start using active directory to au

RE: Outlokk Web Access?

2001-08-31 Thread Mark Harford
You can't see Public Folder Calendars in 5.5 OWA, only 2000 OWA unfortunately. Clicking on a PF Calendar link will end up redirecting you to your own calendar. Mark -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 August 2001 19:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subjec

RE: Default Signature

2001-08-31 Thread Mark Harford
There may be some mapi-based virus-scanners that can implement this type of thing if installed on the X400 bridgehead server. However they will also be a big hit on performance. Mark -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 August 2001 09:14 To: Exch

RE: Recommendations for .pst file backup?

2001-09-05 Thread Mark Harford
Use OSTs. As long as the Exchange server is backed up, you have a back up so no need to backup the OST separately. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 September 2001 09:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendations for .pst file back

RE: Mailbox move rates

2001-09-05 Thread Mark Harford
10mb/min between servers on the same subnet (100mb ethernet) during working hours on busy lan. So approx 6Gb/hour. This was done with just one admin session running Users & Computers. Compaq 5500 to Compaq DL580 both dual processor with RAID 5 IS. Between Exchange 5.5 servers we found that the

RE: E2k public folders sending out 3 mails to mail lists

2001-09-07 Thread Mark Harford
Do you have an autoreply set up or is this happening when one of the users with send-as permissions replies to a mail? If an autoreply, how was the rule created and with what client? Also how many replicas of the PFs do you have and across how many routing/admin groups? Does it happen with inte

RE: Authentication

2001-09-07 Thread Mark Harford
Are you saying that Active Directory has been set up? Sounds like you'd be best off demoting them and leaving them as members of the original NT4 domain. Perhaps install a cheap desktop pc as a BDC if you require one. If you really are going down the AD route, then yes you will need to consider

VBS Blocking

2001-09-07 Thread Mark Harford
This is ridiculous! I have just had my last message rejected as being a Vbscript virus because it had the phrase "Outlook Application" in the plain text message body. The entire log file was also included in the message sent to me which surely is not a good idea. Anyone else set up Mailsweeper

RE: VBS Blocking

2001-09-07 Thread Mark Harford
eper for a client yesterday and blocked VBS > files...but um...not to that level! And no, I didn't include the log > file in the inform message! > > Neil > > -Original Message- > From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Posted At: 07 September 2001 1

RE: VBS Blocking

2001-09-07 Thread Mark Harford
m...not to that level! And no, I didn't include the log file in the inform message! Neil -Original Message----- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 07 September 2001 13:49 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: VBS Blocking Subject: VBS Blocking This is

RE: clustering

2001-09-07 Thread Mark Harford
How about all 20,000 users data on a (mirrored) SAN that is also hosting the OS, so that the actual servers need only have a pair for the swap file. As soon as a server goes belly-up, just flick on another one that boots off the same LUN in the SAN? I expect you could actually script this to ha

RE: VBS Blocking

2001-09-07 Thread Mark Harford
Not forgetting... "and if you can find them" -Original Message- From: Busby, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 September 2001 15:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: VBS Blocking > -Original Message- > From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC

RE: Authentication

2001-09-07 Thread Mark Harford
s a member server that is running SQL 7 on it. Jack -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 7:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Authentication Are you saying that Active Directory has been set up? Soun

RE: new IMS ex 5.5

2001-09-12 Thread Mark Harford
Imccopy.exe? This is one of the \support\utilities on the install cd for 55. check the service pack cd for an updated version though. Best to have two admin sessions running side by side and do it all by hand though so that you are double-checking all the entries and rethinking the logic behind

RE: Change Exchange IP

2001-09-12 Thread Mark Harford
Yes, but only when our DNS admins were doing what they were told and when! Also research anyone or any server that may be using host or lmhost files. -Original Message- From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 September 2001 14:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject

RE: Moving from container to container

2001-09-13 Thread Mark Harford
They all work on the "PSTexport-delete-recreate-PSTimport" basis but just automate it with a nice GUI. I'd investigate the exmerge utility first of all. -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 September 2001 14:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Movi

RE: Moving from container to container

2001-09-13 Thread Mark Harford
bject: RE: Moving from container to container Where do I find the exmerge utility? Do you know of any products that have the GUI interface? Mike Mitchell eMAIL Systems Administrator Alverno Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] (317) 532-7800 ext. 6211 -Original Message----- From: Mark Harfor

RE: Installing Exch2k into Exch55

2001-09-14 Thread Mark Harford
Sounds like you've installed it into the existing site (which is a perfectly valid thing to do). -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 13 September 2001 18:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Installing Exch2k into Exch55 All, I'm trying to install

RE: Intergration Problem

2001-09-14 Thread Mark Harford
John, I'd go rapidly to www.exinternals.com and read up on Exchange 2000; particularly the following paper at the moment - There are also many excellent whitepapers on other aspects of Exchange 2000. N.B. the rea

RE: Listing mailbox contents

2001-09-17 Thread Mark Harford
Why not just export the whole thing to a PST and send it to him on a CD? Mark (and yes I know you can't read a PST directly on a CD-ROM) -Original Message- From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 September 2001 12:34 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Listing mailb

RE: Recipient Update Service Redundancy

2001-09-17 Thread Mark Harford
It seems to be possible to create a second RUS on the same exchange server pointing to a different DC. If you set them to have update schedules that do not conflict this may achieve your goal. However I have not tested this configuration so can not verify it at all. mark -Original Message---

RE: Recipient Update Service Redundancy

2001-09-18 Thread Mark Harford
user while the DC where the original Recipient Update Policy were pointing is done, and not. It was not working even if we created manually a RUP pointing to the other DC (1st one ) JF -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Harford Sent

RE: ADC Problem

2001-09-21 Thread Mark Harford
Sounds like he said they are in the same Org though doesn't say if they are in the same 5.5 site. John - What clients are being used & have you tried eliminating the formatting issue by setting it all to plain text or maybe using OWA to open the mail? Mark -Original Message- From: Ed Cr

RE: Mailbox size advice

2001-09-21 Thread Mark Harford
15MB! In my experience, this just forces people to use PSTs - unless they are very well trained in sending shortcuts and Public Folders. We currently allow 120MB and are planning to increase this when we fully roll out E2K (poss with a SAN at the back end) Luis - you could always investigate Ent

RE: ADC Problem

2001-09-21 Thread Mark Harford
Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 4:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ADC Problem Sounds like he said they are in the same Org though d

RE: Today's pet peeve

2001-09-21 Thread Mark Harford
I find that this setting is remembered between sessions if I log out without closing down ADUC first. Have you tried this? It seems to work when running ADUC on a DC in a TS session as well. Rgrds Mark -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 Septembe

RE: Header file

2001-10-02 Thread Mark Harford
Search technet for "mbinfo" Mark -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 October 2001 16:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Header file What about the script file that allowed you to get the size of the user's mailboxes. Can someone send me th

RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K

2001-10-02 Thread Mark Harford
No laughing matter - we were running two here until last year. (spares were a bit tricky to get hold of!) -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 October 2001 23:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Win 2K and Exchange 2K PDP-11. Ed Crowley Compaq C

RE: E2K SP2

2001-12-06 Thread Mark Harford
Do you have any AV software on the test box as well? We'll be testing it in a lab with Sybari (in either mode) next week but other experience would be useful. [Also of course any updates to the ADC code & effects in a mixed environment might be critical.] cheers Mark -Original Message---

RE: Closing Microsoft Case

2001-12-07 Thread Mark Harford
But was it in a mixed 55/2000 environment or a native E2000 environment? I can understand it in the former but am concerned about the latter. If in the former setup it would also be cleared up by a DS/IS adjust to remove unknown PF permissions (this does not exist in native E2K mode). Paul Bowd

RE: Here Goes. Exch2k

2001-12-07 Thread Mark Harford
www.exinternals.com Check out the whitepapers on best configuration and installation/setup in particular to actually set up the system. You can then use and test your setup in conjunction with reading the books mentioned by others. Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mail

RE: Closing Microsoft Case

2001-12-07 Thread Mark Harford
From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 2:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Closing Microsoft Case But was it in a mixed 55/2000 environment or a native E2000 environment? I can understand it in the former but am concerned about the latter. If i

RE: A Script to Archive Mailboxes

2001-12-10 Thread Mark Harford
Exmerge? -Original Message- From: BY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 December 2001 13:18 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: A Script to Archive Mailboxes Hi group, I have lots of old mailbox data need to be archived as PST data before deleting them from Exchange Server? Do you kno

RE: ADC Connector

2001-12-18 Thread Mark Harford
Easier to rehome them than to recreate. If you bring up your second ADC whilst the first is still running then on the General Tab of each agreement you can change the server that that CA runs on. You will be prompted to retype in the connection username/password. If you are really concerned set

RE: NT4 Domain authnetication

2002-01-05 Thread Mark Harford
You really need to give us a load more info. Is it part of an existing Ex5.5 set up with an ADC in place? Did you use the ADMT or a third-party equivalent to "migrate" the users? Etc, etc. Mark Briefly though, you'll need to add the NT4 accounts into the mailbox permissions of the mailbox-ena

RE: MTA loop

2002-01-07 Thread Mark Harford
If there is an SRS service running on your upgraded server then you could try attaching to that server using Exchange 55 Admin and deleting the directory entry for the phantom server from there. This would be part of the normal process for removing the last 55 server in a mixed site/admin group.

RE: C2C Active Folders and other Exchange monitoring

2002-01-08 Thread Mark Harford
Another product is SRM from Highground which has now been bought out by Sun. http://www.sun.com/storage/software/storage_mgmt/srm_exchange/index.html More sophisticated than Active Folders if I remember correctly but also more expensive. Regards Mark -Original Message- From: Ramsay, S

RE: Screwed up display name

2002-01-08 Thread Mark Harford
Did you use any NT4 to AD migration tools? E.g. ADMT or third-party equivalents. Some of them will overwrite the AD display name with the NT4 Full Name. This may be the source of "Clayton GDY". Rgrds Mark -Original Message- From: Clayton GDY [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 Januar

RE: Public Folder Permissions Vanish

2002-01-09 Thread Mark Harford
How are you making the change - via Outlook, ESM or M: drive? -Original Message- From: Mike Putley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 January 2002 17:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Permissions Vanish I have an issue where I can make myself a folder owner, go back i

RE: Public Folder Permissions Vanish

2002-01-09 Thread Mark Harford
le via ESM then it's fine. It's effecting all folders Thanks for your thoughts. Mike -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 10:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Public Folder Permissions Vanish How are yo

RE: Public Folder Permissions Vanish

2002-01-10 Thread Mark Harford
ubject: RE: Public Folder Permissions Vanish Well I am, but have always been. Your comment is interesting, do you have any information about why being an enterprise admin fouls this up. Sounds amazing Thanks Mike -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday,

RE: Exchg 5.5 ADSI Scripting Question

2002-01-11 Thread Mark Harford
"~DEL" can be used to remove data from specific fields in the user properties. It certainly works for the directory import approach/ -Original Message- From: Aarts, Jan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 January 2002 09:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchg 5.5 ADSI Scripting

RE: Opinion on Backups

2001-10-18 Thread Mark Harford
It does sound v.slow - I think we'd need to know what hardware, what raid controllers, is it across the network, etc, etc to see why. Of course if your figure includes BLBs then we all know why. Mark -Original Message- From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 October 2

RE: Ex 5.5 Public Folder Permissions

2001-10-19 Thread Mark Harford
If the folders were permissioned with dlists then these team leaders would only need to edit the dlists and not the PF permissions directly. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 October 2001 09:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ex 5.5 Pub

RE: ADC Created Account Removal Question

2001-10-22 Thread Mark Harford
You can use the movetree utility to move them to another domain and then just repoint the CAs. (We did this very succesfully here to another domain in the same forest. It's immaterial whether the domain is in the same tree or not.) Mark Harford -Original Message- From: Kastner,

RE: good E2K book

2001-10-23 Thread Mark Harford
He has a good point - it's not that detailed if you really want to know the inner workings. And no disrespect to Tony, but unless there's been a new version out recently, it's also getting out-of-date. Go to the www.exinternals.com site and print out the whitepapers that interest you. These will

RE: Exchange 2K crash after defrag with Eseutil

2001-10-24 Thread Mark Harford
If all your clients are MAPI (i.e. Outlook) then you may just about get away with a blank priv1.stm file since most data in it will also be in the .edb file. Therefore is it worth trying to start the store with no stm file as an experiment & see if one gets created? Mark -Original Message-

RE: Exchange ADC Question

2001-10-25 Thread Mark Harford
Turn on the advanced view in ADUC to view the Microsoft Exchange System Objects container which sits under the domain node. This is where the directory objects created by the PF CA sit. Rgrds Mark -Original Message- From: Mike Putley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 October 2001 23

API for Instant Messaging?

2001-10-25 Thread Mark Harford
Title: API for Instant Messaging? I've dug around on the MSDN site but had no luck so far in searching a method to IM-enable a user programmatically at the time of creation. We would like to script the process for IM-enabling a user object and dictate what that IM address will be rather than

RE: PFAdmin tool for 5.5

2001-10-25 Thread Mark Harford
Anything happen to the pfadmin article? The utility pulls out information on 99% of the PFs that we have in our site, but not quite all. Therefore I'm interested to know what the implications of some of the errors seen in the pfinfo.log are. They fall into three categories:- Error getting dire

RE: API for Instant Messaging?

2001-10-26 Thread Mark Harford
Excellent! Ta very much Mark Harford | Exchange 2000 Project BBC Technology | DSD T: +44(0)20 7765 0668 M: +44(0)7801 912974 http://www.bbctechnology.com -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 October 2001 13:08 To: Exchange Discussions Subject

RE: Exch2K Install - No Migration

2001-10-26 Thread Mark Harford
Try my usual link for when the MS site doesn't give up the answers easily - www.exinternals.com. V.good whitepapers section. Mark -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 October 2001 15:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exch2K Install - No Migr

RE: How to break Exchange in the Lab [Was: NTBackup]

2001-10-29 Thread Mark Harford
Another good one is to let your IS and/or logfile space run out very rapidly from a mail loop (use blat or the reskit simulation tools for the loop). See if you really can get that server back up and running with some extra disks within your SLA period & the mail loop cleared up before it goes dow

RE: Question regarding attachment utilities

2001-10-30 Thread Mark Harford
Active folders from C2C may help. -Original Message- From: Treacy, Ray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 October 2001 15:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Question regarding attachment utilities Hi, I am interested in finding a utility that can do the following: - search an Ex

RE: Auto Accept Script

2001-11-01 Thread Mark Harford
Does OWA for 5.5 use CDO? I ask as we have had some users experience this type of calendar corruption recently and the only common factor we can find is that the problem occurred after they had been using OWA & also that their Exchange servers had been upgraded to SP4 in the last month or so. Th

RE: Exchange 5.5 SP2 to SP4 upgrade

2001-11-02 Thread Mark Harford
SP4 introduced some CDO problems as well so look out for the CDO fixes. We think it's caused calendar corruption here after using OWA to edit calendar appointments. rgrds Mark Harford | Exchange 2000 Project BBC Technology | DSD T: +44(0)20 7765 0668 M: +44(0)7801 912974

RE: Error When Expanding Public Folders in System Manager

2001-11-02 Thread Mark Harford
Does the account you are logged on with have a mailbox itself? This is necessary to administer PFs. mark -Original Message- From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 November 2001 15:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Error When Expanding Public Folders in System Mana

RE: ADC

2001-11-09 Thread Mark Harford
And in English? CAs are between (containers in) 55 Sites and (OUs in) AD Domains whereas you appear to be referring to Sites when you may mean Domains and vice-versa. Rephrase it logically and we'll see what we can do! Mark -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PRO

RE: Seriously been tasked with this

2001-11-09 Thread Mark Harford
Since you already have the MS licenses, could you have a totally separate "standby" forest configured with just a couple of DC/GCs and one E2K box with very strict mailbox limits? Presumably it's not a breach of licensing to have standby/recovery servers so you are just stretching that point a li

RE: OWA in forgien country

2001-11-12 Thread Mark Harford
OWA 2000? It's possible that some of the cybercafes had firewalls that claim to pass http1.1, but in fact do not do it properly. This results in your being able to get into OWA but then not see messages in the Inbox (amongst other things). The simplest solution seems to be to ensure that your b

RE: calendar views

2001-11-12 Thread Mark Harford
Schedule Plus used to do this ok! I remember complaints about this issue when we moved everyone to using Outlook. Try www.slipstick.com. Mark H x50668 -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 12 November 2001 15:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: c

RE: Instant Messenger

2001-11-12 Thread Mark Harford
AFAIK the 4.5 client doesn't yet support E2K IM. Regarding your other problem, you don't say where you have got to in the setup. Have you defined an IM home server yet or just installed the service? If installed did you accept the default of the FQDN for the home server DNS setting or have you

RE: Instant Messenger

2001-11-13 Thread Mark Harford
enger I do apologize for being so vague. I do have all the below setup. I have a small test setup with W2K and E2K and an XP client. The only errors I see are in the %WinDir%\System32\logfiles dir are 501 errors. -Original Message- From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: M

RE: ambiguous smtp proxy

2001-11-13 Thread Mark Harford
Title: Message To find the ambiguous proxy, try running a csvde export of the AD with the email addresses attribute included & then manipulate it in Access or Excel to find the duplicate.   As for the latter issue, are your mailbox CAs two-way & also replicating deletions?  I'd initially tr

RE: delegate access to 2000 mailbox by 5.5 mailbox

2001-11-14 Thread Mark Harford
Title: Message Trusts? don't rely on transitive trusts if the 55 user is on an NT4 domain.  E2K will be trying to resolve the 55 users mailbox to an NT ACE therefore the 55 users NT account must be the primary account and from a domain that both W2K users domains trust.   not sure if i've go

RE: delegate access to 2000 mailbox by 5.5 mailbox

2001-11-14 Thread Mark Harford
Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions & Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07974 111867 Fax: 01256 754899 Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-----From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 200

RE: No Global Catalog server found

2001-11-25 Thread Mark Harford
Try the dsadiag.exe utility as well from www.exinternals.com Also did you reboot SERVER1 after enabling it as a GC? Exchange needs you to do this. Mark H -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 November 2001 18:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: OST synchronizing problems

2001-11-28 Thread Mark Harford
What does the synchronisation log say (you'll find this in the users deleted items or their dumpster if they clear out deleted items)? Also have you or any other Exchange admins for other Admin Groups made any changes to the Organizational Forms set up recently? You should check what permissions

RE: OST synchronizing problems

2001-11-28 Thread Mark Harford
ng Folder 'v-mail' 07:50:12 Synchronizing Views 07:50:12 Done 07:50:13 Microsoft Exchange offline address book 07:50:130X8004010F -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Harford Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 3:22 AM To: Ex

RE: E2K wont receive mail in 5.5 site.

2001-11-29 Thread Mark Harford
Check both the permissions paper & the exchange installation/setup whitepaper at www.exinternals.com. You will need to establish a recipients connection. Mark H x50668 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 November 2001 16:56 To: Exchange Discu

RE: CDO/CDOHTML Hot Fix Q289606

2001-11-29 Thread Mark Harford
I got the impression it would only prevent new problems occuring but not fix existing problems. This is certainly the case with calendar corruptions via OWA. Mark H -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 November 2001 18:12 To: Exchange Discussions S

RE: mailbox manager blues...

2001-11-29 Thread Mark Harford
What does the event log say? At the very least you should see the message relating to your test mailboxes being logged onto by an account that is not the PWNT. Mark H -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 November 2001 18:10 To: Exchange Discussio

RE: solution for running OWA5.5 as front end server

2001-11-30 Thread Mark Harford
Could you send this type of thing to the list server rather than to me directly? I know the 55FE/2KBE works ok in a mixed 55/2000 environment but have no experience of it in a native E2K environment. A better alternative is to force the use of the "reach" OWA 2000 client. Either get your ISP use

RE: Mail Flow within same Storage Group

2001-11-30 Thread Mark Harford
I'd check out the GC that it's using. It may be worth running dsadiag to force the re-discovery of a GC/DC. Mark H -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 November 2001 14:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mail Flow within same Storage Group Al

RE: Dacl and WSS

2001-12-05 Thread Mark Harford
MSDN is usually good for this type of thing Mark H -Original Message- From: Henrik Andersson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 December 2001 18:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subje

RE: two sites, one org, two domains > AD

2002-01-21 Thread Mark Harford
Sounds right to me. We have ten or so sites and initially all Connection Agreements (covering all ten sites) attached to just one Exchange 55 Server in the main hub site. Obviously 9 out of the 10 CAs could only be one-way agreements but it worked just fine. The E2K users in the main hub site/AG

RE: ex 5.5 --> ex 2000 connections

2002-01-24 Thread Mark Harford
>From the old exinternals Permissions Guide... To create a CCA Technically, you need to have the following permissions: * Read on the "CN=Microsoft Exchange,CN=Services,CN=Configuration, DC=your-domain-here" object * Full control on the "CN=Active Directory Connections,CN=Microsoft E

RE: pfadmin.exe

2002-01-25 Thread Mark Harford
With only one Public Store per TLH allowed in a cluster are you attaching to the right server? Might be worth checking the legacyexchangedn value in ldp or adsiedit and double checking that it matches up with the server correctly. Also can we assume that all appropriate users can access PFs on t

RE: directory export and import

2002-01-29 Thread Mark Harford
Exchange Admin in raw mode? -Original Message- From: Green, Jacky {IT~Welwyn} [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 January 2002 16:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: directory export and import Hello, Can anyone tell me where I can find a definitive list of headers for creating a CSV

RE: Restriciting use of MSN Messenger

2002-01-31 Thread Mark Harford
And the great thing about IM is that it does not fill up our lovely exchange servers with trivia! He'd only be abusing emails otherwise. -Original Message- From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 January 2002 22:46 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Restriciting use

RE: Active Directory

2002-02-19 Thread Mark Harford
1) You'll need ESM installed on the second DC to view the Exchange Attributes in ADUC. 2) prior to running the upgrade, could you see the 55 server in the configuration naming context container in AD? A config connection agreement will need to be running for this info to replicate into AD and an

RE: Exporting Group Membership with Exhchange 2000

2002-02-25 Thread Mark Harford
If you're concerned about getting the exact syntax correct just paste the full CN out of ADSIEDIT. I generally use notepad to set up a small batch file (save as *.cmd) that I can then type in the full csvde or ldifde syntax and play around with it. -Original Message- From: Bryon Barkley

RE: Identifying how much space is being taken up by deleted items and deleted mailboxes.

2002-02-25 Thread Mark Harford
You could try the mbinfo utility (I'd get the latest version from PSS). -Original Message- From: Marc Mearns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 February 2002 16:45 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Identifying how much space is being taken up by deleted items and deleted mailboxes. Ca

RE: Child Domains and account creation

2002-03-04 Thread Mark Harford
Have you created an RUS for the child domain? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 March 2002 17:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Child Domains and account creation Just remembered that I did not run domainprep on the child domain prior to lo

  1   2   3   >