Dr John's speech during GP made me realize
that, ignoring the quantitative aspect,
the first sounds of Sanskrit alphabet,
namely a (aa) i (ii) u (uu) and R,
actually (almost) form a sandhi variant
of the word 'aayus' (as in aayur-veda;
in pausa 'aayuH').
That's because when 'i' is followed by
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a fascinating topic. Plenty of websites
show the connection between winds producing plenty
of positive ions, and the general cantakerousness
of the population. Prolonged exposure to positive
ions from the Fohn, Mistral, and other persistent
winds can also cause quite serious cases of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
If that's what you want out of a spiritual teacher, I'm sure
there are many out there who will provide it. Me, I'd be
happier with someone who
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
If that's what you want out of a spiritual teacher, I'm sure
there
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a fascinating topic. Plenty of websites
show the connection between winds producing plenty
of positive ions, and the general cantakerousness
of the population. Prolonged exposure to positive
ions from the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My experience in Santa Fe and in other places in the desert
bears out this predilection theory. Santa Fe got a lot of
winds. They would drive many, if not most, people bull-goose
loony. Even the cops noticed it, and
Comments interleaved below.
anonymousff wrote:
This is a fascinating topic. Plenty of websites
show the connection between winds producing plenty
of positive ions, and the general cantakerousness
of the population.
TurquoiseB wrote:
My experience with winds and the reactions
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Comments interleaved below.
anonymousff wrote:
This is a fascinating topic. Plenty of websites
show the connection between winds producing plenty
of positive ions, and the general cantakerousness
of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comments interleaved below.
anonymousff wrote:
This is a fascinating topic. Plenty of websites
show the connection between winds producing plenty
of positive ions, and the general cantakerousness
of
This entire thread has pointed up for me the
damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don't nature
of spiritual teaching.
A teacher who won't accept the overshadowing of
a person in ignorance will be accused of insensitivity.
The teacher who shows too much compassion -- or
perhaps compassion of the
This sounds like an experience I have;
Sometimes more clearly, when I am well rested, eating well, and have a
clear witness in my consciousness.
We all have Darshan; we all radiate the vibration, which we are;
sometimes peaceful, we radiate peacefulness;
when angry, we radiate anger.
When
-Humans are just channels of energy; the more energy you give out in
this free flow of compassionate energy, the more you are empowered.
Amma seems to be in a unique position of being there for so many,
who are willing to recieve. There must also be a willingness to
recieve. I have never had
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Question below.
authfriend wrote:
I don't think you'd care for him much. Here's his
description of one of the teachers who works with
Saniel Bonder, from the Web site:
What follows sounds like a great
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This entire thread has pointed up for me the
damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don't nature
of spiritual teaching.
Exactly. And the whole problem is that some in this thread
are suggesting that there is a right way
Hello,
Please come and join us and share you views and ideas on some of the most interesting topic posted by people...
Some of the recent interesting topics on the board:
http://www.sunsigns.org/viewtopic.php?t=1232 Here in this thread Mr. Tolson, Ms. YaYa try to explain to Abhishek that
--There is a concept, which Eckhart Tolle, talks about: the Pain
Body.
He claims, it is the pain body, which interferes with the
experience of Being, Presence, Enlightenment.
One technique he uses to alleviate the pain body is to just sit with
it; witness it.
He says, that the pain body,
Comments interleaved below.
TurquoiseB wrote:
stress is just an intellectual excuse that those who
believe themselves unenlightened can cling to to preserve
their illusion of unenlightenment.
To balance my original statement, I concede that *providing*
such excuses could be seen as a
I heard Maharishi say, during the Guru Purnamah Celebration, that wherever there is someone who is enlightened, then Sat Yuga, is lively there.
I believe he originally came to the conclusion, that Kali Yuga, although appearing to be all-encompassed in ignorance, is dysfunctional in all of it's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Er, I think you accidentally incorporated your
own response into the syntax of the response
sequence. It was more like, What is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--There is a concept, which Eckhart Tolle, talks about: the Pain
Body.
He claims, it is the pain body, which interferes with the
experience of Being, Presence, Enlightenment.
One technique he uses to alleviate the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
I am talking about generic teaching in the above case. In this
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
May perhaps be a different phenomenon then; I have noticed this
particularly when I am fully rested and collected, and the thoughts
are of nothing other than their own emergence from the Unmanifest;
the suffering
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yes, I was in a bit of a hurry earlier and didn't express it very
well-- going from pure transparent clear light into colors very
definitely has a flavor of suffering to it. I'll have to watch
more carefully to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you see the difference between You're trying to
avoid becoming enlightened and I perceive that the
way you're going about this is getting in the way of
your enlightenment?
I know that this question was posed to Jim,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
If that's what you want out of a spiritual teacher, I'm sure
there
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Just to clarify a bit -- in calling the cause of
suffering stories, I am not trying to denigrate the experience
of
suffering itself,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This entire thread has pointed up for me the
damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don't nature
of spiritual teaching.
Yup yup yup.
A teacher who won't accept the overshadowing of
a person in ignorance will be
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My experience in Santa Fe and in other places in the desert
bears out this predilection theory. Santa Fe got a lot of
winds. They would
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
BTW, for what it's worth, I have also noticed this subjective
or predilection component with places of power.
There are some places that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Er, I think you accidentally incorporated your
own
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exactly. Which is one reason the stick to one teacher
idea may be fatally flawed. One teacher may work for
a student for a while, but then the student's body/mind
construct develops defenses against that teacher,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Just to clarify a bit -- in calling the cause of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Question below.
authfriend wrote:
I don't think you'd care for him much. Here's his
description of one of the teachers who
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This entire thread has pointed up for me the
damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don't nature
of spiritual teaching.
Exactly. And the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
In our Philosophy of Science core course at MIU in 1977, David
Clay deconstructed the stress theory and clarified its
shortcomings. It was a clarifying if understated moments in my
Maharishi education.
I'd
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Do you see the difference between You're trying to
avoid becoming enlightened and I perceive that the
way you're going about this is getting
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Bad stress. Evil stress. If it weren't for stress, I'd be
enlightened.
Another useful aspect of the stress/samskaras idea is
to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
A 14-year-old is basically an immature adult. BIIIG difference
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason, for me at least, these pictures aren¹t showing up. I just see
a blank
box with an x in it.
on 8/6/05 6:12 PM, Jason Spock at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You could email him offline. I see little evidence
that he
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps the appropriate question is, How is what the
teacher is saying affecting me? Do I find it
liberating--does it inspire me to expand into it, to
drop my boundaries--or do I experience it as constricting,
a
TurquoiseB wrote:
Actually, in Cuckoo's Nest, it's really bull-goose loony.
Wow. All these years I've had it wrong. Thus is the knowledge lost.
- Patrick Gillam
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Bad stress. Evil stress. If it weren't for stress, I'd be
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
In our Philosophy of Science core course at MIU in 1977, David
Clay deconstructed the stress theory and clarified its
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
[I wrote:]
Giving the child a realistic approach to death and
dying, moreover, is not necessarily something that
can only be successfully accomplished if you start
at the age of 4.
That's the story you tell
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This is a fascinating topic. Plenty of websites
show the connection between winds producing plenty
of positive ions, and the general
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
In our Philosophy of Science core course at MIU
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
[I wrote:]
Giving the child a realistic approach to death and
dying, moreover, is not necessarily something that
can only be
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This is a fascinating topic. Plenty of websites
show the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
But Lawson's point had to do with a child's
neurological development, not just with psychology.
I don't know the exact cutoff point of the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
But Lawson's point had to do with a child's
neurological development,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
[I wrote:]
Giving the child a realistic approach to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
In our Philosophy of Science core course at MIU
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Right. Suppose you told your 4-year-old child that
one day
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
There are traditions in which the teacher *deliberately* sets
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yes, I was in a bit of a hurry earlier and didn't express it very
well-- going from pure transparent clear light into colors very
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam
[EMAIL
Anyone remember a comment by MMY that floating and the rest of the
perfected sidhis were a sign of Unity and that the introduction of the
sidhis program would be a real eye-opener to some in the TMO concerning
their own state of development?
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the contrary, as I have stated many times before (and
as you have chosen to disbelieve many times before),
I assume that I am wrong about pretty much *every-
thing*. That helps me when I state opinion X one day
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Fischer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On the contrary, as I have stated many times before (and
as you have chosen to disbelieve many times before),
I assume that I am wrong
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What might happen if the parents simply talked to
the child as if there were an immortal being dwelling
in that child's body, one
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rory:
Excellent question; I would have to say No... more a case of
witnessing and unraveling the bodymind's samskaras/habit-patterns
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh shit! Here we go again! Was my snit-fit with Akasha
as bad as this? (Yes!!) I respect all of these writers
individually, but when they go at it like
this
--- authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
---
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Oh shit! Here we go again! Was my snit-fit with Akasha
as bad as this? (Yes!!) I respect all of these writers
individually, but when they go at it like
this
...you tend to blindly assume something like a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh shit! Here we go again! Was my snit-fit with Akasha
as bad as this? (Yes!!)
Yes.
I respect all of these writers
individually, but when they go at it like
this
I'm already out of it. I said what I had
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Oh shit! Here we go again! Was my snit-fit with Akasha
as bad as this? (Yes!!)
Yes.
I respect all of these writers
individually, but when
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snippity snip
Do you see the difference between You're trying to
avoid becoming enlightened and I perceive that the
way you're going about this is getting in the way of
your enlightenment?
Yes, the first phrasing is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snippity snip
Do you see the difference between You're trying to
avoid becoming enlightened and I perceive that the
way you're going
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snippity snip
Do you see the difference between You're trying
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Rory:
Excellent question; I would have to say No... more a case of
witnessing and unraveling the bodymind's samskaras/habit-
patterns
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Rory:
Excellent question; I would have to say No... more a case of
witnessing and unraveling the bodymind's samskaras/habit-
patterns
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip
Do I believe that your motive of becoming enlightened is genuine?
If that's what you want out of a spiritual teacher, I'm sure
there are many out there who will provide it. Me, I'd be
happier with someone who told me the truth.
What is truth?
I am curious because I cannot figure out what role you have taken?
Are you Sokrates?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snippity snip
Do you see the difference between You're trying to
avoid becoming enlightened and I perceive that the
way you're going
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
[EMAIL
authfriend wrote:
is it even *possible* to add
anything spiritual, if we are That to begin with?
From the perspective of ignorance, yes. One is adding
to one's awareness of the spiritual, of awareness itself.
I think of it this way: meditation adds to the amount of
clock time each day one
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So if an enlightened person tells me, You're
trying to avoid become enlightened, I am to
assume that's the Way It Is?
*lol* Yes, I probably would be open to the idea, if I wished to align
myself with the particular
So the difference to me is clear. You persist in making these
semantic
distinctions, which are irrelevant to the topic at hand. Do I
believe
that your motive of becoming enlightened is genuine? As
Maharishi says, the prrof is in the pudding.
What pudding?
1 - 100 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
