--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only role I've seen Nicholson play in which he wasn't
ACTING was Eugene O'Neill in Warren Beatty's Reds.
Somehow, Beatty made him stop ACTING and got him to
just *act*, and he turned in a brilliant performance
in a
Oh my, I seem to have touched a nerve. ;-)
--- shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
drpetersutphen@
wrote:
Was this before or after he started eating
babies?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Well, it's hard to get out of AOL once you get in;
sort of like they
use scare tactics and other brain-washing tools to
keep you hooked.
With all due
On Jun 30, 2006, at 6:11 PM, authfriend wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Judy, our conversation is begining to take a disturbing turn! Well, you did say once you wanted to have tantric sex with me. This is as close as yer gonna get. Would this be a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
Only role I've seen Nicholson play in which he wasn't
ACTING was Eugene O'Neill in Warren Beatty's Reds.
Somehow, Beatty made him stop ACTING and
--- Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 30, 2006, at 6:11 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Judy, our conversation is begining to take a
disturbing turn!
Well, you did say once you wanted to have
tantric sex with me.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 30, 2006, at 6:11 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
drpetersutphen@
wrote:
Judy, our conversation is begining to take a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 30, 2006, at 6:11 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@
wrote:
Judy, our conversation is begining to take a
disturbing turn!
Well, you did say once you wanted
There is a big difference in how many were here then
and now. But how many
centers have you been in, in which you saw any
Indian immigrants donating time
or getting initiated. It wasn't because they weren't
out there, they were.
The only center I spent any appreciable amount of time
On Jul 1, 2006, at 12:28 AM, gullible fool wrote: There is a big difference in how many were here then and now. But how many centers have you been in, in which you saw any Indian immigrants donating time or getting initiated. It wasn't because they weren't out there, they were. The only
Did you update your TM sadhana via Amma (e.g. did
you have her
transmit your own devata to what your TM ishta
was?). Just curious
how many others have done this.
No. I did get a mantra from Amma two or three years
ago, but that was after I quit TM. When I first saw
Amma for darshan, in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 28, 2006, at 4:48 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
In the early days (1967), he told the story often that
it was a name that his students (note: *not* peers) had
given him, and that he allowed them to do so.
Do you believe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gerbal88 no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gerbal88 no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablus108 nablus108@
wrote:
Regardless of anything, if a man is called, let's say,
Frank Loyd Wright and has been called this for the
last 50 years, why in the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablus108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablus108 nablus108@
wrote:
Regardless of anything, if a man is called, let's say,
Frank Loyd
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gerbal88 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gerbal88 no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
jflanegi@
wrote:
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's name
on 6/28/06 5:29 PM, gerbal88 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
M Group was another of Mahesh's jokes at the expense of others'
sincerity. Bevan got the real thing back in India in the early 60's.
I think he got initiated in 67.
Guru Bev isn't
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's name
on 6/28/06 5:26 PM, gerbal88 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I caught Mahesh in a highly compromising activity early in my TM
stint. I simply could not admit to myself that what I saw meant
exactly what I knew, but could not admit, it meant
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/28/06 5:26 PM, gerbal88 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I caught Mahesh in a highly compromising activity early in my TM
stint. I simply could not admit to myself that what I saw meant
exactly what I knew, but
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablus108 nablus108@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablus108 nablus108@
wrote:
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's name
on 6/29/06 4:15 PM, gerbal88 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com , Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/28/06 5:26 PM, gerbal88 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:no_reply
I think hearing the human side of characters like MMY with such a
carefully crafted spiritually special image is valuable and highly
entertaining. I wish I could hear one tail of his human mischief for
each time I had to listen to one of Bevan's adjectives-on-parade,
condescending introductions
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gerbal88 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer groups@ wrote:
on 6/28/06 5:26 PM, gerbal88 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I caught Mahesh in a highly compromising activity early in my TM
stint. I simply could
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/29/06 4:15 PM, gerbal88 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%
40yahoogroups.com
, Rick Archer groups@ wrote:
on 6/28/06 5:26 PM, gerbal88 at [EMAIL
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's name
on 6/29/06 6:33 PM, gerbal88 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com , Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/29/06 4:15 PM, gerbal88 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:no_reply
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/29/06 6:33 PM, gerbal88 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%
40yahoogroups.com
, Rick Archer groups@ wrote:
on 6/29/06 4:15 PM, gerbal88 at [EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/29/06 6:33 PM, gerbal88 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%
40yahoogroups.com
, Rick Archer groups@ wrote:
on 6/29/06 4:15 PM, gerbal88 at [EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gerbal88 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer groups@ wrote:
on 6/29/06 6:33 PM, gerbal88 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%
40yahoogroups.com
, Rick
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gerbal88 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
where he was totally demanding and uncompromising (I want what
I want and you will
get it for me, give it to me, or you're outta here).
You mean you couldn't just hang out, play bad guitar, and smoke the
weed like
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's name
on 6/29/06 8:03 PM, gerbal88 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can understand the desire to know the nitty and the gritty of all
this, but it's just useless information to clutter the mind. Either
you think Mahesh is the way to salvation or you
--- Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/29/06 6:33 PM, gerbal88 at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com
, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/29/06 4:15 PM, gerbal88 at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's name
on 6/29/06 8:17 PM, off_world_beings at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick, give it up...that book you are writing is going to be full of
unsubstantiated rumor and childish exaggerations and gossip. No-one
except the TMexers here will read
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's name
on 6/29/06 8:19 PM, off_world_beings at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You got nothing. You are just looking for attention, but will find
something to make up that is totally unsubstantiated and
uncorroborated by the majority of the people who were
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/29/06 8:19 PM, off_world_beings at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You got nothing. You are just looking for attention, but will find
something to make up that is totally unsubstantiated and
uncorroborated by the
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's name
on 6/29/06 8:50 PM, off_world_beings at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com , Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/29/06 8:19 PM, off_world_beings at [EMAIL PROTECTED
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/29/06 8:50 PM, off_world_beings at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%
40yahoogroups.com
, Rick Archer groups@ wrote:
on 6/29/06 8:19 PM, off_world_beings
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's name
on 6/29/06 9:12 PM, off_world_beings at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And which would those be?
Which of those did you specifically see with your own eyes, and have
a clear memory of? Please explain each clearly and specifically?
Youve been
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/29/06 9:12 PM, off_world_beings at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And which would those be?
Which of those did you specifically see with your own eyes, and
have
a clear memory of? Please explain each clearly and
I caught Mahesh in a highly compromising activity early in
my TM
stint. I simply could not admit to myself that what I saw
meant
exactly what I knew, but could not admit, it meant.
Care to elaborate?
Oh, I'd love to bang on about it, but, really, who cares.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/29/06 6:33 PM, gerbal88 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%
40yahoogroups.com
, Rick Archer groups@ wrote:
on 6/29/06 4:15 PM, gerbal88 at [EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gerbal88 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer groups@ wrote:
on 6/29/06 4:15 PM, gerbal88 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%
40yahoogroups.com
, Rick
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gerbal88 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer groups@ wrote:
on 6/29/06 6:33 PM, gerbal88 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%
40yahoogroups.com
, Rick
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
I don't want to get into a pissing contest as regards MMY and the
DL -- especially since I have my own problems and complaints about
MMY and the TMO -- but since YOU invoked the comparison above, I
thought it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/29/06 8:19 PM, off_world_beings at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You got nothing. You are just looking for attention, but will find
something to make up that is totally unsubstantiated and
uncorroborated by the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gerbal88 no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer groups@
wrote:
on 6/29/06 6:33 PM, gerbal88 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/29/06 9:12 PM, off_world_beings at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And which would those be?
Which of those did you specifically see with your own eyes, and
have
a clear memory of? Please explain each clearly and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I caught Mahesh in a highly compromising activity early
in
my TM
stint. I simply could not admit to myself that what I
saw
meant
exactly what I knew, but could not admit, it meant.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Jun 27, 2006, at 8:03 PM, Vaj wrote:
IIRC there is also an interview with one of the
Shankaracharya's
where they state that it is an
Regardless of anything, if a man is called, let's say,
Frank Loyd Wright and has been called this for the
last 50 years, why in the world would anyone say his
name is Frankie just because they don't like him?
Can't the Wikipedia people see through this?
Who is behind this
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablus108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regardless of anything, if a man is called, let's say,
Frank Loyd Wright and has been called this for the
last 50 years, why in the world would anyone say his
name is Frankie just because they don't like
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 27, 2006, at 6:43 PM, peterklutz wrote:
I.e. Mahesh was given the full name Maharishi Mahesh Yogi when his
peers/tradition over fifty years ago cognized him to be (1) a yogi
as well as (2) a great seer.
On Jun 27, 2006, at 10:26 PM, authfriend wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jun 27, 2006, at 8:03 PM, Vaj wrote: IIRC there is also an interview with one of the Shankaracharya's where they state that it is an assumed name and that he was not a yogi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 27, 2006, at 10:26 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Jun 27, 2006, at 8:03 PM, Vaj wrote:
IIRC there is also an interview with one of the Shankaracharya's
On Jun 28, 2006, at 1:43 AM, sparaig wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jun 27, 2006, at 8:03 PM, Vaj wrote: IIRC there is also an interview with one of the Shankaracharya's where they state that it is an assumed name and that he was not a yogi
On Jun 28, 2006, at 4:48 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jun 27, 2006, at 6:43 PM, peterklutz wrote: I.e. Mahesh was given the full name Maharishi Mahesh Yogi when his peers/tradition over fifty years ago cognized him to be (1) a yogi
Whether the name/title 'Maharishi' was initially self-applied or not,
it most likely that it started with someone mishearing his name
(Mahesh) or someone using the term 'Mahashay' (Mahashay = adj.n.mas.
magananimous, munificent, a term of respect, sir, master, mister.)
Certainly the signing of
On what basis do you assert that Swami Swaroopanand left the service
of Gurudev before the latter's demise in 1953?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Jun 27, 2006, at 10:26 PM,
In a message dated 6/27/06 10:40:23 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED]com
wrote: In a message dated 6/27/06 7:14:21 P.M.
Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]net
writes: In the ongoing battle at wikipedia certain
editors
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablus108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regardless of anything, if a man is called, let's say,
Frank Loyd Wright and has been called this for the
last 50 years, why in the world would anyone say his
name is Frankie just because they don't like
It's a silly and pointless exercise in futiity. Mahesh's secrecy
policy is the modus operandi that drove the early Movement. The
rather mundane fact that his mother named him Mahesh probably has
some significance in all this, but who actually cares. What kind
of maharishi or, for that matter,
One thing MMY has never done is accept a formal disciple, as far as
I can
tell.
Nandkashore is gunna be pissed when he finds this out. You might want
to straighten out Purusha and Mother Divine on this point before they
get too much older. Unrequited discipleship, how sad! It was
probably just
I.e. Mahesh was given the full name Maharishi Mahesh
Yogi when his
peers/tradition over fifty years ago cognized him to
be (1) a yogi as
well as (2) a great seer.
His own account is that the press gave him that title when they
described him for his library lectures as a great
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing MMY has never done is accept a formal disciple, as far
as
I can
tell.
And, of course, there's Sattyanand, Devindra and Guru Bev (Bevin
became a brahmachari, probably one of the very few westerners if
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 27, 2006, at 10:26 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Jun 27, 2006, at 8:03 PM, Vaj wrote:
IIRC there is also an interview with one of the Shankaracharya's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whether the name/title 'Maharishi' was initially self-applied or
not,
it most likely that it started with someone mishearing his name
(Mahesh) or someone using the term 'Mahashay' (Mahashay =
adj.n.mas.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gerbal88 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a silly and pointless exercise in futiity. Mahesh's secrecy
policy is the modus operandi that drove the early Movement. The
rather mundane fact that his mother named him Mahesh probably has
some significance in
Seems like MMY likes all the benefits of having
disciples, but he accepts none of the reponsibility of
having disciples.
--- curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
One thing MMY has never done is accept a formal
disciple, as far as
I can
tell.
Nandkashore is gunna be pissed when he
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems like MMY likes all the benefits of having
disciples, but he accepts none of the reponsibility of
having disciples.
Did you talk or read accounts of any direct disciples who actually
felt this to be true?
Either way,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I.e. Mahesh was given the full name Maharishi Mahesh
Yogi when his
peers/tradition over fifty years ago cognized him to
be (1) a yogi as
well as (2) a great seer.
His own account is that the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems like MMY likes all the benefits of having
disciples, but he accepts none of the reponsibility of
having disciples.
sounds like saying a tree likes all the benefits of having leaves, but
accepts none of the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On what basis do you assert that Swami Swaroopanand left the service
of Gurudev before the latter's demise in 1953?
My very bad. I misread the history of the succession wars.
Yahoo! Groups
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@ wrote:
Seems like MMY likes all the benefits of having
disciples, but he accepts none of the reponsibility of
having disciples.
sounds like saying
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
One thing MMY has never done is accept a formal disciple, as far as
I can
tell.
Nandkashore is gunna be pissed when he finds this out. You might want
to straighten out Purusha and Mother Divine on this point
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gerbal88 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@ wrote:
Seems like MMY likes all the benefits of having
disciples, but he accepts
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gerbal88 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@
wrote:
Seems like MMY likes all the benefits of having
disciples, but he accepts
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's name
on 6/28/06 10:23 AM, gerbal88 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com , curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing MMY has never done is accept a formal disciple
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gerbal88 no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gerbal88 no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/28/06 10:23 AM, gerbal88 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%
40yahoogroups.com
, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
One thing MMY has never
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gerbal88 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gerbal88 no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gerbal88 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
It's an irresponsible question, isn't it. You (we, anyone who could
do something for Mahesh) couldn't be responsible, only Mahesh had
the wast wedic wisdom to know what was best for any and everyone.
Hi, Sudarsha!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gerbal88 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gerbal88 no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
jflanegi@
wrote:
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi's name
on 6/28/06 2:04 PM, new.morning at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question to Peter did he hear directly from any long-term disciples
that MMY accepts none of the reponsibility of
having disciples. Or is it simply baseless speculation?
There were
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/28/06 2:04 PM, new.morning at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question to Peter did he hear directly from any long-term disciples
that MMY accepts none of the reponsibility of
having disciples. Or is it simply
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gerbal88 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gerbal88 no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/28/06 2:04 PM, new.morning at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question to Peter did he hear directly from any long-term
disciples
that MMY accepts none of the reponsibility of
having disciples. Or is it simply
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer groups@ wrote:
on 6/28/06 2:04 PM, new.morning at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question to Peter did he hear directly from any long-term disciples
that MMY
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but sowed plenty of wild oats while MUM President
Unsubstantiated made up sh't
OffWorld
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups. See
On Jun 28, 2006, at 9:46 PM, sparaig wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer groups@ wrote: on 6/28/06 2:04 PM, new.morning at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My question to Peter did he hear directly from any
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question to Peter did he hear directly from any long-term
disciples
that MMY accepts none of the reponsibility of
having disciples. Or is it simply baseless speculation?
There were times when Maharishi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
:-)
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
See what's inside the new Yahoo! Groups email.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2pRQfA/bOaOAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM
~-
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL
:
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups. See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/TISQkA/hOaOAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM
~-
To subscribe,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 28, 2006, at 9:46 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer groups@ wrote:
on 6/28/06 2:04 PM, new.morning at
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer groups@ wrote:
My question to Peter did he hear directly from any long-term
disciples
that MMY accepts none of the reponsibility of
having disciples.
There were times when Maharishi promised, both to individuals and
groups,
that he would take personal responsibility for their evolution.
The best
known example was at the end of the Amherst course, summer of 78
or
79,
when MMY was trying to talk everyone into moving to MIU. He
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In the ongoing battle at wikipedia certain editors have taken to the
practice of referring to MMY as simply Mahesh.
Aside the fact that the only name MMY has been known by for the last
fifty or so years is MMY, I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In the ongoing battle at wikipedia certain editors have taken to the
practice of referring to MMY as simply Mahesh.
Aside the fact that the only name MMY has been known by for the last
fifty or so years is MMY, I was
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz peterklutz@
wrote:
In the ongoing battle at wikipedia certain editors have taken to
the
practice of referring to MMY as simply Mahesh.
Aside the fact
In a message dated 6/27/06 7:14:21 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In the
ongoing battle at wikipedia certain editors have taken to the practice
of referring to MMY as simply Mahesh. Aside the fact that the
only name MMY has been known by for the last fifty
201 - 300 of 321 matches
Mail list logo
