On Oct 15, 2006, at 10:35 PM, new.morning wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 15, 2006, at 9:15 PM, new.morning wrote:
OK, thanks. The mac pro is less expensive than a similar Dell.
Surprising, I want to study it more.
But still, in the
On Oct 16, 2006, at 8:05 AM, Vaj wrote:A couple of things, first of all, this is NOT emulation. With emulation there is no contest, as emulation is VERY slow. Secondly, in the June edition of Macworld, they test equivalent PC systems running XP Pro with Macs of the same config booted for
On Oct 16, 2006, at 12:12 AM, new.morning wrote:I don't know. Can it? If so that would be great. It's already been done (Vista has been run on Intel Macs). Boot Camp will need to be updated however for support from it.
__._,_.___
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A couple of things, first of all, this is NOT emulation. With
emulation there is no contest, as emulation is VERY slow.
I have no interest in dual booting, but I'm very curious to see the
performance numbers with Parallels
On Oct 16, 2006, at 9:10 AM, Alex Stanley wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A couple of things, first of all, this is NOT emulation. With emulation there is no contest, as emulation is VERY slow. I have no interest in dual booting, but I'm very curious
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As an example a 2.16 GHZ T2600 dual core Macbook laptop ran Windows
Media Encoder at a score of 280, an HP Pavillion 2.16 GHZ T2600 dual
core scores with a DESKTOP (with probably a faster hard drive)
scores at 279
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
A couple of things, first of all, this is NOT emulation. With
emulation there is no contest, as emulation is VERY slow.
I have no interest in dual
On Oct 16, 2006, at 10:19 AM, new.morning wrote:great. I would like to see tests on a range of software though. That doesn't expalin the discrepencey of a 4 core Mac pro only equaling performance of a Dell two core PC -- FROM the article you sent. You do realize that the Mac Pro is TWO dual
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 16, 2006, at 10:19 AM, new.morning wrote:
great. I would like to see tests on a range of software though.
That doesn't explain the discrepencey of a 4 core Mac pro only
equaling performance of a Dell two core
On Oct 16, 2006, at 10:19 AM, new.morning wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As an example a 2.16 GHZ T2600 dual core Macbook laptop ran Windows Media Encoder at a score of 280, an HP Pavillion 2.16 GHZ T2600 dual core scores with a DESKTOP (with
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 16, 2006, at 10:19 AM, new.morning wrote:
That doesn't expalin the discrepencey of a 4 core Mac pro only
equaling performance of a Dell two core PC -- FROM the article you
sent.
Which article? I posted quite
On Oct 16, 2006, at 12:45 PM, new.morning wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 16, 2006, at 10:19 AM, new.morning wrote: That doesn't expalin the discrepencey of a 4 core Mac pro only equaling performance of a Dell two core PC -- FROM the article you
On Oct 16, 2006, at 12:09 PM, new.morning wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 16, 2006, at 10:19 AM, new.morning wrote: great. I would like to see tests on a range of software though. That doesn't explain the discrepencey of a 4 core Mac pro only
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 16, 2006, at 12:45 PM, new.morning wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Oct 16, 2006, at 10:19 AM, new.morning wrote:
That doesn't expalin the discrepencey of a 4 core
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 16, 2006, at 12:45 PM, new.morning wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote: On Oct 16, 2006, at 10:19 AM, new.morning wrote:That doesn't expalin the discrepencey of a 4 core Mac pro
On Oct 16, 2006, at 1:28 PM, new.morning wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 16, 2006, at 12:45 PM, new.morning wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:On Oct 16, 2006, at 10:19 AM, new.morning wrote: That doesn't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 16, 2006, at 1:28 PM, new.morning wrote:.

The Falcon Northwest Mach V runs Intel's long-awaited Core 2
processor (formerly known as Conroe). It's the new desktop
performance champ, and the one others will be
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Without knowing the article in question and no direct quote, I have
no idea. Like I said before, they roughly the same as regular Wintel
machines.
Not surprising. Traditionally, Apple has designed its own motherboards,
On Oct 16, 2006, at 2:21 PM, new.morning wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 16, 2006, at 1:28 PM, new.morning wrote:.  The Falcon Northwest Mach V runs Intel's long-awaited Core 2 processor (formerly known as Conroe). It's the new desktop
On Oct 16, 2006, at 10:19 AM, new.morning wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As an example a 2.16 GHZ T2600 dual core Macbook laptop ran Windows Media Encoder at a score of 280, an HP Pavillion 2.16 GHZ T2600 dual core scores with a DESKTOP (with
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's what's already been discussed New Mourn: it's also a Conroe
processor which is supposed to be the fastest of the fast.
Ok thanks for the clarification. So the article you sent me upon my
query about side-by side*
You already have them, check your email. Like I said, this is old news.
On Oct 16, 2006, at 4:20 PM, new.morning wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's what's already been discussed New Mourn: it's also a Conroe
processor which is supposed to be the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
snip
Besides, this PC is only 3 years old, and its 2.8GHz P4
is overkill for what I do. A couple years from now,
everything will be
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
snip
Besides, this PC is only 3 years old, and its 2.8GHz P4
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
That's what some pundits are predicting because many people will
have to buy new Pee Cees to run it, upgraders will pay close to
300 bucks and many
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
---
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 jyouells@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
---
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 jyouells@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In
Yeah, the Hercules card. We called it a graphics
card. Made it possible to play computer games.
Ever play the one where babies were thrown out the
windows of a burning building, and you had to catch
them before they hit the ground? I think it was just
called Babies.
And to think parents
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 jyouells@
wrote:
snip
'Bouncing Babies' I believe it was called :)
Yes, that was it! There was a little stretcher you
had to manuever underneath the babies.
--- Vaj wrote:
That's not to ignore that there are numerous features I like in XP
that I'd also like to see transferred on OS X.
Same here. In the end, though, I guess I dislike
Windows because it's butt-ugly, and I like
Apple because it's so well designed. If I'm going
to spend my day
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, the Hercules card. We called it a graphics
card. Made it possible to play computer games.
Ever play the one where babies were thrown out the
windows of a burning building, and you had to catch
them
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, the Hercules card. We called it a graphics
card. Made it possible to play computer games.
Ever play the one where babies were thrown out the
windows of a burning building, and you had to catch
them
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
That's what some pundits are predicting because many people will
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
Yeah, the Hercules card. We called it a graphics
card. Made it possible to play computer games.
Ever play the one where babies
On Oct 15, 2006, at 10:13 AM, Patrick Gillam wrote:--- Vaj wrote: That's not to ignore that there are numerous features I like in XP that I'd also like to see transferred on OS X. Same here. In the end, though, I guess I dislike Windows because it's butt-ugly, and I like Apple because
I am not a gamer so my view is shaped by TV commercials for the
game. I'm sure you are right. One funny thing is how satisfying PONG
is! The intuitive sense of how it bounces still holds up today.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Vista (was Re: Fwd: A PROGRESS REPORT)
on 10/15/06 2:09 AM, authfriend at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com , authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
---
On Oct 14, 2006, at 10:55 PM, Alex Stanley wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's what some pundits are predicting because many people will have to buy new Pee Cees to run it, upgraders will pay close to 300 bucks and many are just tired of the Spyware
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 jyouells@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 jyouells@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In
TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
On Oct 15, 2006, at 12:59 PM, sparaig wrote:Burroughs B3500 with 640 kilodidgits of core memory. Before that, it was an IBM 360 at school, I think... Yep, remember it well, the ole IBM 360. That's what I learned to program on.
__._,_.___
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TurquoiseB wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 15, 2006, at 12:59 PM, sparaig wrote:
Burroughs B3500 with 640 kilodidgits of core memory. Before that,
it was an IBM 360 at
school, I think...
Yep, remember it well, the ole IBM 360. That's what I learned
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 15, 2006, at 10:13 AM, Patrick Gillam wrote:
--- Vaj wrote:
That's not to ignore that there are numerous features I like in XP
that I'd also like to see transferred on OS X.
Same here. In the end, though, I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Sinclair
Timex Sinclair, that's what my sister and I had
with the tape drive.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am not a gamer so my view is shaped by TV commercials for the
game. I'm sure you are right. One funny thing is how satisfying PONG
is! The intuitive sense of how it bounces still holds up today.
Probably the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 jyouells@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
---
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
The nice thing about that is that even a low-end PC will be able to
render video, multi-track music files and 3D raytraced animation
quite quickly compared to today. The average person home power user
can even
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 jyouells@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 jyouells@
wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
snip
Sinclair
That was a late 70's computer, wasn't it? I started to
On Oct 15, 2006, at 1:16 PM, sparaig wrote:The eye candy of MacOS X works best with more RAM also, but appears to degrade gracefully if you don't have it. Yeah, but a gig will do IME.
__._,_.___
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
[...]
The nice thing about that is that even a low-end PC will be able
to
render
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
snip
On Oct 15, 2006, at 1:48 PM, sparaig wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] The nice thing about that is that even a low-end PC will be able to render video, multi-track music files and 3D raytraced animation quite quickly compared to today. The
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In
Alex Stanley wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's what some pundits are predicting because many people will
have to buy new Pee Cees to run it, upgraders will pay close to
300 bucks and many are just tired of the Spyware issues and so
on which
new.morning wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
Vaj wrote:
On Oct 15, 2006, at 10:13 AM, Patrick Gillam wrote:
--- Vaj wrote:
That's not to ignore that there are numerous features I like in XP
that I'd also like to see transferred on OS X.
Same here. In the end, though, I guess I dislike
Windows because it's butt-ugly, and I like
jim_flanegin wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 jyouells@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In
Vaj wrote:
On Oct 14, 2006, at 10:55 PM, Alex Stanley wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's what some pundits are predicting because many people will
have to buy new Pee Cees to run it, upgraders will pay close to
300 bucks and many are just tired
jyouells2000 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 jyouells@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
jyouells2000 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 jyouells@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
One of the interesting things in my field is that publishers think that
us old timers who coded on the early machines are the best to hire for
products on the embedded systems like the Pocket PC, Palm, Sony PSP,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jyouells2000 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 jyouells@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
new.morning wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 jyouells@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jyouells2000 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 jyouells@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
On Oct 15, 2006, at 3:08 PM, Bhairitu wrote:Vaj wrote: On Oct 15, 2006, at 10:13 AM, Patrick Gillam wrote: --- Vaj wrote: That's not to ignore that there are numerous features I like in XP that I'd also like to see transferred on OS X. Same here. In the end, though, I guess I dislike Windows
jyouells2000 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jyouells2000 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 jyouells@
wrote:
jyouells2000 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
new.morning wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 jyouells@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used to pride myself on knowin the assembly language for every
computer I programmed
for since 1984. I've owned a PC for games for about 6 years now,
and I STILL haven't
learned ix86 assembler.
I was quite
Vaj wrote:
On Oct 15, 2006, at 3:08 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
Vaj wrote:
On Oct 15, 2006, at 10:13 AM, Patrick Gillam wrote:
--- Vaj wrote:
That's not to ignore that there are numerous features I like in XP
that I'd also like to see transferred on OS X.
Same here. In the end, though, I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
I used to pride myself on knowin the assembly language for every
computer I programmed
for since 1984. I've owned a PC for games for about 6
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vaj wrote:
Check out the new ad:
http://www.apple.com/getamac/
And pick better results.
Yup, I've seen this propaganda. At my old job I also dealt
with Apple development. I'm not saying Macs are bad but a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
Vaj wrote:
Check out the new ad:
http://www.apple.com/getamac/
And pick better results.
Yup, I've seen this propaganda. At my old job
On Oct 15, 2006, at 5:59 PM, new.morning wrote:But the new Apple Quad (not sure of maketing name) 2 dual core intel procs on a dual slot motherboard sounds intersting. Seen any benchmarks on that. http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,2014446,00.asp(Note the price listed on this PC mag review is
On Oct 15, 2006, at 6:46 PM, Vaj wrote:(Note the price listed on this PC mag review is over twice the actual price)Oops, didn't realize the model reviewed was with 4 gigs of RAM and a honkin' video card...
__._,_.___
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
Vaj wrote:
Check out the new ad:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 15, 2006, at 6:46 PM, Vaj wrote:
(Note the price listed on this PC mag review is over twice the
actual price)
Oops, didn't realize the model reviewed was with 4 gigs of RAM and a
honkin' video card...
My
Perhaps I am misreading the benchmarks, but it appears that the dual
core gateway is killing the quad core apple running in native apple
os, and costing twice as much. Seems just like it has been for 20 years.
Am I missing somethhng?
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Oct 15, 2006, at 6:46 PM, Vaj wrote:
(Note the price listed on this PC mag review is over twice the
actual price)
Oops, didn't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 15, 2006, at 5:59 PM, new.morning wrote:
But the new Apple Quad (not sure of maketing name) 2 dual core intel
procs on a dual slot motherboard sounds intersting. Seen any
benchmarks on that.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps I am misreading the benchmarks, but it appears that the dual
core gateway is killing the quad core apple running in native apple
os, and costing twice as much. Seems just like it has been for 20 years.
Am I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
Perhaps I am misreading the benchmarks, but it appears that the dual
core gateway is killing the quad core apple running in native apple
os, and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Oct 15, 2006, at 6:46 PM, Vaj wrote:
(Note the price listed
On Oct 15, 2006, at 7:43 PM, new.morning wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote: Perhaps I am misreading the benchmarks, but it appears that the dual core gateway is killing the quad core
On Oct 15, 2006, at 8:29 PM, Vaj wrote:On Oct 15, 2006, at 7:43 PM, new.morning wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:Perhaps I am misreading the benchmarks, but it appears that the dualcore
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 15, 2006, at 7:43 PM, new.morning wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
Perhaps I am misreading the
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
