--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mrsatva mrsatva@ wrote:
Italy or France?
The far more interesting and improtant questions are
for Sunday
Federer or Nadal?
and Sat --
Mauresmo vs
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ME: So all that is left is the
claim that they somehow scrubbed out all the hopping artifacts. I
believe that they just pasted in a period of coherence and that
the whole chart is a fraud. I am opened to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No need for get a clue rudeness.
I've mentioned this at least half a dozen times,
and you *still* haven't addressed it.
You don't define what is relevant to me.
Oh, blow it out your I/O port. It's irrelevant
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
I deleted this post a few minutes after sending it, seeing that Spraig
did respond with a link of cites (a bit of a shotgun) some of wich
possibly
nablus108 wrote:
American Television;
Back then, it was called the:
Dick Cavette Show
and approapriately so...
As Mr. Cavette could sometimes present himself as a dick.
Anyway,
He's a little bi-polar(Mr. Cavette, that is), so I give him credit
for even holding down the postition.
Anyway, Mr.
And you also didn't address this:
You know, I was wrong. The difference between the
two charts *is* important to those who believe the TMO
has committed a terrible sin of deception.
The one from the TM site--the one on the left--clearly
shows coherence *ending* after liftoff. Perhaps
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 8, 2006, at 12:29 PM, new.morning wrote:
I deleted this post a few minutes after sending it, seeing that Spraig
did respond with a link of cites (a bit of a shotgun) some of wich
possibly support the SA articles
Me: I was telling you that I had already done what you suggested and
they do line up. I blew up the blue one so I could read the numbers
on the side. The resolution on the blue one is worse because of how
they compressed that graphic. You can lose pixels. It could have
been scanned poorly or
Only in Mad City!
--- Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thrus. June 29th.
Madison, WI.
Rep.Steve Nass(R.Whitewater) calls for the immediate
dismissal of UW-Madison lecturer Kevin Barrett,
because of Barrett's view, expressed on WTMJ-AM,
that the government orchestrated the Sept. 11
Hey Pete,
Ready for some violence and mayhem tonight? Here is the UFC fight card:
Andrei Arlovski vs Tim Sylvia:
Ken Shamrock vs Tito Ortiz:
Frank Mir vs Dan Christensen:
Josh Burkman vs Josh Neer:
Yves Edwards vs Joe Stevenson:
Anthony Perosh vs Jeff Monson:
Kurt Pellegrino vs Drew
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And you also didn't address this:
You know, I was wrong. The difference between the
two charts *is* important to those who believe the TMO
has committed a terrible sin of deception.
The one from the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Me: I was telling you that I had already done what you suggested and
they do line up.
You had reduced the black-and-white chart to the size of
the blue chart, then superimposed them (using different
colors for
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 7/8/06 11:56:38 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Barrett's view, expressed on WTMJ-AM, that the government orchestrated the
Sept. 11 attacks. Barrettt teaches an introductory course
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
ME: So all that is left is the
claim that they somehow scrubbed out all the hopping artifacts. I
believe that they just pasted in a period of coherence and that the
whole chart is a fraud. I am opened to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 7/8/06 11:56:38 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
babajii_99@ writes:
Barrett's view, expressed on WTMJ-AM, that the government
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 8, 2006, at 12:29 PM, new.morning wrote:
I deleted this post a few minutes after sending it, seeing that Spraig
did respond with a link of cites (a bit of a shotgun) some of wich
possibly support the SA articles
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
I deleted this post a few minutes after sending it, seeing that Spraig
did
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 7/8/06 11:56:38 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
babajii_99@ writes:
In a message dated 7/8/06 3:21:25 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If it's
a publicly funded forum, one *should* have theright to use it. *Privately*
funded would be anotherstory.
Agreed.
__._,_.___
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go
The layers function in Photoshop allows you to vary the opacity to see
the lines underneath. It is not preserved when you flatten the
graphic. Once flattened and compressed for the Web it looks like one
graph. I can't preserve what you need to see for a Web graphic. But
any program with layers
In a message dated 7/8/06 3:18:45 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No. One
has a right to be heard, but one doens't always have a right to use a publicly
funded forum to exercise one's rights.
Wrong , no one has a right to be heard period. I don't have to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
And you also didn't address this:
You know, I was wrong. The difference between the
two charts *is* important to those who
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
Understood. Though, for me that, and related, are the questions of
interest: how does mainstream science use and measure the term BWC (or
EEG
Interesting in that:
1) It is possible that nonprimate organisms, even such relatively
simple ones as mice, possess far more sophisticated cognitive
machinery than was previously thought.
2) It is also possible, however, that empathic feeling does not
represent as much of a high-water mark of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The layers function in Photoshop allows you to vary the opacity to see
the lines underneath. It is not preserved when you flatten the
graphic. Once flattened and compressed for the Web it looks like one
graph.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
Understood. Though, for me that, and related, are the questions of
interest: how
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting in that:
1) It is possible that nonprimate organisms, even such relatively
simple ones as mice, possess far more sophisticated cognitive
machinery than was previously thought.
2) It is also possible,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 8, 2006, at 2:50 PM, new.morning wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Jul 8, 2006, at 12:29 PM, new.morning wrote:
I deleted this post a few minutes after sending it,
On Jul 8, 2006, at 4:20 PM, sparaig wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jul 8, 2006, at 12:29 PM, new.morning wrote: I deleted this post a few minutes after sending it, seeing that Spraig did respond with a link of cites (a bit of a shotgun) some of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Possibly. TB's are great at posting such BS, I'd be very careful. A
common pattern really among many fundamentalists: dazzle with the BS.
This and other references to TBers has made me ponder. If Vaj is
refering to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
snip
The longer I look at the chart on the right, the less
I understand what it shows. The Y axis is time, the
X axis is cycles per second. So what do
I love my Photoshop! Interesting point about the limits, I didn't
know this was solved in later versions. I am using 6 and need to
upgrade sometime.
Does Fireworks do this? I used that program years ago and it had some
interesting differences.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
Possibly. TB's are great at posting such BS, I'd be very
careful. A
common pattern really among many fundamentalists: dazzle with
the BS.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 8, 2006, at 2:50 PM, new.morning wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Jul 8, 2006, at 12:29 PM, new.morning wrote:
I deleted this post a few minutes after sending it,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The layers function in Photoshop allows you to vary the opacity to
see
the lines underneath. It is not preserved when you flatten the
graphic. Once flattened and compressed for the Web it looks like
one
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
Understood.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
Interesting in that:
1) It is possible that nonprimate organisms, even such relatively
simple ones as mice, possess far more sophisticated
Sacred minds
Though spirituality may be inherent, connections of doctrine and
biology create the whole person
By Julia C. Keller
(December 16, 2005)
Catholic theology says that all people including children are
considered spiritual. And now neurological evidence shows that
inherent brain
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
Possibly. TB's are great at posting such BS, I'd be very
careful. A common pattern really among many fundamentalists:
dazzle with the BS.
This
http://www.stnews.org/books-2847.htm
Excerpts
The idea of memes falls short
Here is what I consider to be the strongest of these models in detail
the meme, which is a hypothetical cultural or intellectual
replicator. In this model, religions might be memes that infect our
brains. They are not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://www.stnews.org/books-2847.htm
Excerpts
The idea of memes falls short
Here is what I consider to be the strongest of these models in
detail
the meme, which is a hypothetical cultural or intellectual
From the makers of _The Incredibles_.
http://www.dumpalink.com/media/1151315452/Jack_Jack_Attack
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Yahoo! Groups gets a make over. See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/XISQkA/lOaOAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM
I'll be back I am just playing a lot this weekend .
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
The layers function in Photoshop allows you to vary the opacity to
see
the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 7/8/06 11:56:38 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Barrett's view, expressed on WTMJ-AM, that the government orchestrated the
Sept. 11 attacks. Barrettt teaches an introductory course
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From the makers of _The Incredibles_.
http://www.dumpalink.com/media/1151315452/Jack_Jack_Attack
That's way cool.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Something is new at Yahoo!
The coherence in your brain,in your body,in the world,is rising
weather you use graphics or photoshop or whatever.
We are now at a point of no return.
Maharishi inaugurated The Dawn of The Age of Enlightenment in 1975.
Now we see one fruitition of that profound claim; some Sidhas, hidden
The researchers believe that cyanovirin-N could become a powerful new weapon in the fight against HIV, as it prevents the virus from infecting human cells. They are keen to make a microbicide cream for women in Africa and other developing countries where many have little or no control over their
You'd probably dig subscribing to Planet TV, as it is loaded with stuff like this:http://www.dailyplanettv.net/The recent video of a Marijuana Vodka, made in Prague, was interesting:http://www.absinthesupply.net/products/cannabis-vodka.html?act_vnThe CGI video of the recent asteroid pass hitting
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 7/8/06 11:56:38 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
babajii_99@ writes:
Barrett's view, expressed on WTMJ-AM, that the government
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
http://www.stnews.org/books-2847.htm
Excerpts
The idea of memes falls short
Here is what I consider to be the strongest of these
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 8, 2006, at 4:20 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Jul 8, 2006, at 12:29 PM, new.morning wrote:
I deleted this post a few minutes after sending it, seeing
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In
Very interesting QA interview at Salon.com
(if you aren't a subscriber, you'll need to
watch a brief ad to access it).
The Disbeliever, by Steve Paulson
Sam Harris, author of 'The End of Faith,' on why religious moderates
are worse than fundamentalists, 9/11 led us into a deranged holy war,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
Interesting in that:
1) It is possible that nonprimate organisms, even
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I love my Photoshop! Interesting point about the limits, I didn't
know this was solved in later versions. I am using 6 and need to
upgrade sometime.
Think its at least partially solved in Photoshop CS 2, maye
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
Possibly. TB's are great at posting such BS, I'd be very
careful. A
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
From the makers of _The Incredibles_.
http://www.dumpalink.com/media/1151315452/Jack_Jack_Attack
That's way cool.
I'm pretty sure that's pirated.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
http://www.stnews.org/books-2847.htm
Excerpts
The idea of memes falls short
Here is what I consider to be the strongest of these
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
http://www.stnews.org/books-2847.htm
Excerpts
The idea of memes
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In
On Jul 8, 2006, at 8:13 PM, sparaig wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jul 8, 2006, at 4:20 PM, sparaig wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote: On Jul 8, 2006, at 12:29 PM, new.morning wrote: I deleted this post a few
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
http://www.stnews.org/books-2847.htm
Excerpts
The idea of memes
Presumably not to be confused with a V-Meme, or what is often
shortened to just meme.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VMeme
On Jul 8, 2006, at 6:03 PM, new.morning wrote:
http://www.stnews.org/books-2847.htm
Excerpts
The idea of memes falls short
Here is what I consider to be the
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/09/us/09army.html
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups. See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/TISQkA/hOaOAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even cement is information-processing from the perspective of the
unified field...
The unified field has a (single)(any) perspective?
Thats your cognition and you are sticking to it?
To subscribe, send a message to:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
Even cement is information-processing from the perspective of the
unified field...
The unified field has a (single)(any) perspective?
Thats your
71 matches
Mail list logo
