:
-- Forwarded Message
From: sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 15:33:04 -
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Jyotirmath Shankaracharya Lineage in the
20th Century
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Dana's response:
Rick,
only time for a moment of response to this guy's nonsense below.
He isn't offering any compelling argument in support of Vasudevananda's
claim other than he said, she said. A comment from Shantananda, whether
it was made or not, is only one comment in a sea of comments
:
-- Forwarded Message
From: sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 15:33:04 -
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Jyotirmath Shankaracharya Lineage
in the
20th Century
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
What claim did I make about Swami Vasudevananda? I only repeated what
Anoop Chandola said Swami Brahmandanda told him in a response to a
question about MMY.
What does my source disagree about? Anoop Chandola said it was a good
summary of the politics surrounding the succession to Gurudev's
on 7/9/05 5:53 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another one:
Many mistakes in the entry below. no time now but for starters, I
DID
interview Vishnudevananda in depth and had a research assistant
interview
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 7/9/05 5:53 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Another one:
Many mistakes in the entry below. no time now but for starters,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't really been following all these pissing contest
posts, and I've never been on AMT. I just want to say that
aside
on 7/2/05 2:35 AM, TurquoiseB at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't really been following all these pissing contest
posts, and I've
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahh, what's so special about cheesemakers?
Well, obviously this is not meant to be taken literally.
It refers to any manufacturers of dairy products.
Right. Such as Jesus Cheeses, Inc.
I think it's a great
on 7/2/05 12:44 PM, lurkernomore20002000 at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahh, what's so special about cheesemakers?
Well, obviously this is not meant to be taken literally.
It refers to any manufacturers of dairy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doubtful, since neither I nor Anoop Chandola ever disagreed with
him on anything. You obviously didn't read the entire thing I wrote
below.
Uh, and that doesn't *tell* you anything? :-)
To subscribe, send a message
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doubtful, since neither I nor Anoop Chandola ever disagreed with
him on anything. You obviously didn't read the entire thing I wrote
below.
On Jun 30, 2005, at 5:57 PM, Peter Sutphen wrote:
Boy, has this turned into a massive pissing contest!
Well it has raged on AMT for a while as well.
I
think everybody that cares needs to come to their own
conclusion in this matter and recognize that any
legitimate authority in one side's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Doubtful, since neither I nor Anoop Chandola ever disagreed
with
him
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 30, 2005, at 5:57 PM, Peter Sutphen wrote:
Boy, has this turned into a massive pissing contest!
Well it has raged on AMT for a while as well.
No, it hasn't.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Crux of this issue is found at the very end. If you can't stand my ranting,
at least read
the last paragraph or two at the end of my response.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 30, 2005, at 5:57 PM, Peter Sutphen wrote:
Boy, has this turned
Thanks Unc. I appreciate the clarification...
I'm not on your shit list now, by any chance, am I?
Snicker...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Unc. I appreciate the clarification...
I'm not on your shit list now, by any chance, am I?
Snicker...
Never have been, man. Really. I've just been
trying to point out that you've essentially
trotted out the
On Jul 1, 2005, at 10:55 AM, sparaig wrote:
MY position comes from Anoop Chandola's conversation with his
meditation teacher,
Swami Shantananda Saraswati, closest disciple of Swami Brahamanda
Saraswati, AKA
Gurudev on this forum. No account denies that Swami Shantananda
Saraswati was
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Crux of this issue is found at the very end. If you can't stand
my ranting, at least read
the last paragraph or two at the end of my response.
FWIW, I think you may have written Brahmananda
instead of Shantananda a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Unc. I appreciate the clarification...
I'm not on your shit list now, by any chance, am I?
Snicker...
Never have been, man.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 1, 2005, at 10:55 AM, sparaig wrote:
MY position comes from Anoop Chandola's conversation with his
meditation teacher,
Swami Shantananda Saraswati, closest disciple of Swami Brahamanda
Saraswati, AKA
Gurudev
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please give reference to an account that says that Swami Shantananda
was NOT the closest
disciple of Gurudev...
And if you would, please give reference
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Crux of this issue is found at the very end. If you can't stand
my ranting, at least read
the last paragraph or two at the end of my
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
They feel that gratitude *simultaneously*
to feeling doubts about him or confusion about some
of the silly-ass things he's done and continues to do.
snip
Unc
Exactly! Just want to highlight this. It's these two
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please give reference to an account that says that Swami Shantananda
was NOT
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 30, 2005, at 5:57 PM, Peter Sutphen wrote:
Boy, has this turned into a massive pissing contest!
Well it has raged on AMT for a while
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 1, 2005, at 11:46 AM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 1, 2005, at 10:55 AM, sparaig wrote:
MY position comes from Anoop Chandola's conversation with his
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
They feel that gratitude *simultaneously*
to feeling doubts about him or confusion about some
of the silly-ass things he's done and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 30, 2005, at 5:57 PM, Peter Sutphen wrote:
Boy, has this
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks Unc. I appreciate the clarification...
I'm not on your shit
On Jul 1, 2005, at 12:09 PM, anonymousff wrote:
I like your posts, and they often provide insight. However, on this
point, your implied casting of Vaj as incorrect -- not telling the
truth -- makes me ponder you may certainly have some quite different
standard for truth than most. And
On Jul 1, 2005, at 12:16 PM, sparaig wrote:
You seem to not be aware of a number of things 1) the Shankaracharya
is
not necessarily the one who chooses his successor
So the successor is generally chosen over the wishes of the
Shankaracharya?
That's not what I said. Please read it again
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 1, 2005, at 12:09 PM, anonymousff wrote:
I like your posts, and they often provide insight. However, on this
point, your implied casting of Vaj as incorrect -- not telling the
truth -- makes me ponder you may
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 30, 2005, at 5:57 PM, Peter Sutphen wrote:
Boy, has
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
But even if he had said It has 'raged on' 'in AMT' for a while, I
dont see that that connates either currently or continuously.
Has raged on AMT for a while does indeed
suggest that it's ongoing there.
But in any
: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Jyotirmath Shankaracharya Lineage
in the 20th Century drpetersutphen
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Boy, has this turned into a massive pissing contest! I
think everybody that cares needs to come to their own
conclusion in this matter and recognize that any
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Your response provides some interesting context for your repeated
: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Jyotirmath Shankaracharya
Lineage
in the 20th Century drpetersutphen
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Boy, has this turned into a massive pissing contest! I
think everybody that cares needs to come to their own
conclusion in this matter and recognize that any
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
However your claim that the Shankaracharaya linneage
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I may have been *incorrect* to assume Vaj was
referring to the narrow issue of Chandola's
account of his conversation with Shantanand,
but you appear
On Jul 1, 2005, at 1:02 PM, sparaig wrote:
Who is a playground bully on AMT and who is a playground bully here?
I think you're smart enough to figure that out yourself in regards to
AMT as you spend a lot of time there.
As far as here goes, it's a different place so I don't know that the
on 7/1/05 2:36 PM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 1, 2005, at 1:02 PM, sparaig wrote:
Who is a playground bully on AMT and who is a playground bully here?
I think you're smart enough to figure that out yourself in regards to
AMT as you spend a lot of time there.
As far as
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 1, 2005, at 12:16 PM, sparaig wrote:
You seem to not be aware of a number of things 1) the
Shankaracharya
is
not necessarily the one who chooses his successor
So the successor is generally chosen over the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't really been following all these pissing contest posts, and
I've
never been on AMT. I just want to say that aside from posts at which
you
snipe at one another, everything I've read by Vaj, Unc, and Judy is
LOL. Talk about making sure that you get the response you're looking
for.
Tell him that Anoop Chandola is a guy who learned to meditate from
Swami Shantananda during the period when MMY was with the Beatles,
because his family had religious clout in Northern India (who chose
to meet with
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Swami Shantananda's response was to laugh and say Let me put it to
you this way: he would have been my first choice as my sucessor but
they would allow it due to the caste laws.
Should read they would not allow it
on 6/30/05 3:43 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to hear what Dana Sawyer says when you quote all this (plus
whatever face-saving commentary you add, of course).
I won't add any, since I don't have a vested interest in this debate and
know little about it. I'll just forward
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/30/05 3:43 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to hear what Dana Sawyer says when you quote all this (plus
whatever face-saving commentary you add, of course).
I won't add any, since I don't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/30/05 4:01 PM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry I can't reply to an original post in this thread, but I've
deleted it,
Boy, has this turned into a massive pissing contest! I
think everybody that cares needs to come to their own
conclusion in this matter and recognize that any
legitimate authority in one side's eyes will not be
legitimate in the other side's eye. A matter of
emotionally invested position. And by
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Boy, has this turned into a massive pissing contest! I
think everybody that cares needs to come to their own
conclusion in this matter and recognize that any
legitimate authority in one side's eyes will not be
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/19/05
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
People have lots of recollections too. One of
mine is that what Sparaig just said about the
TM-Sidhis culturing Unity comes directly from
I like the idea that moral development must precede higher spiritual
attainments. Otherwise those attainments can be misused. I wonder whether
this is a recommendation or a requirement.
Originally it was a requirement for even learning knowledge period. But
typically a teacher
assesses the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
People have lots of recollections too. One of
mine is that
on 6/19/05 7:26 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In other words--it's a lot deeper that simple meditation this path, and
yogic siddhis will block the path.
So do you think MMY knew this and wanted to block people's CC, or disagreed
with it and felt the sidhis would culture CC?
To
On Jun 19, 2005, at 12:03 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
on 6/19/05 7:26 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In other words--it's a lot deeper that simple meditation this path,
and
yogic siddhis will block the path.
So do you think MMY knew this and wanted to block people's CC, or
disagreed
on 6/19/05 11:34 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 19, 2005, at 12:03 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
on 6/19/05 7:26 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In other words--it's a lot deeper that simple meditation this path,
and
yogic siddhis will block the path.
So do you think MMY
The oldest and most profound ethical standard is: Do not do anything
to others, that you do not want others to do to you. I would not
trust anybody as Enlightened, if they do not live according to that
standard. In my eyes it includes no lies, not steal, not cheat and
also not experiment with
On Jun 19, 2005, at 1:05 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
I like the idea that moral development must precede higher spiritual
attainments. Otherwise those attainments can be misused. I wonder
whether
this is a recommendation or a requirement. We see so many examples of
people
who apparently have
On Jun 19, 2005, at 1:22 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
I once heard a story, possibly from someone who witnessed the
incident (but
I'm not sure) that Maharishi and a few of his disciples were visiting
another guru and a few of his. The other guru told one of his
disciples to
go into samadhi.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/19/05 7:26 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In other words--it's a lot deeper that simple meditation this path,
and
yogic siddhis will block the path.
So do you think MMY knew this and wanted to block
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/19/05 7:26 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In other words--it's a lot deeper that simple
meditation this path,
and
yogic siddhis will block the path.
So
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/19/05 7:26 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In other words--it's a lot deeper
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/19/05
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/19/05 7:26 AM, Vaj at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In other words--it's a lot deeper
on 6/18/05 12:31 AM, akasha_108 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dana Sawyer travels to India almost yearly, and interviews 100s of
swamis, teachers, shakaracharas regularly.
Sorry I haven't weighed in on this discussion. I'm now 462 posts behind. I
feel like that guy in Master and Commander who
on 6/18/05 12:47 AM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I am
missing relevant info on Chandol, plese provide it.
Done.
Discovering Brides by Anoop Chandola
That settles it. He's the ultimate authority on the Shankaracharya
controversy.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/18/05 12:47 AM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I am
missing relevant info on Chandol, plese provide it.
Done.
Discovering Brides by Anoop Chandola
That settles it. He's the ultimate
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/18/05 12:47 AM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I am
missing relevant info on Chandol, plese provide it.
Done.
Discovering Brides by Anoop Chandola
That settles it. He's the ultimate
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/18/05 12:47 AM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Plus 8 scholarly books [by chandol] on linguistics and music. What
has Dana Sawyer
on 6/18/05 1:19 AM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/18/05 12:47 AM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I am
missing relevant info on Chandol, plese provide it.
Done.
Discovering Brides by Anoop
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 6/18/05 12:47 AM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Plus 8
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 6/18/05 1:19 AM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 6/18/05 12:47 AM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I am
missing
78 matches
Mail list logo
