What is so terribly sad is that Adobe has never really shown that it
understands what FrameMaker is for. They have always had their head
firmly in the designer/graphics artist/page layout camp.
Scott
At 8:57 AM -0700 9/29/08, Lea Rush wrote:
>Damn. Thanks for the heads' up. My hope is that
Perhaps what you need is a URL link since you are using separate
files over a LAN at an HTTP location.
Scott
At 4:32 PM -0500 9/30/08, Peter Gold wrote:
>Hi, Ben:
>
>Have you examined the links in the PDF with the Link tool? Perhaps
>you'll find a clue that sheds light on the behavior.
>
>HTH
>
The graphics embedded in a Word file are raster graphics (bitmapped) so
when you export those graphics through Mif2Go you will get either jpg or
gif, depending on which format you select. There is no way to tell what
the original format was.
Scott
Diane Gaskill wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> We are
Tracy,
What you are talking about is a graphic. Which is bad news. You would
need to create the graphic for each chapter number.
IF you are lucky you might find a suitable font. But I wouldn't count on it.
Scott
Tracy Penn wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone know how to add a shadow to the text
I have used Word 2007. They tried to fix what wasn't broken. And no,
they didn't fix either the numbering system or multi-file operations.
It's still oriented toward smaller documents with less complexity.
I also would avoid it for any XML work. My preference, but their past
history of munging
Another thought.
You can use Notepad to program in various languages, but why would you
want to? You are missing so many effective and time-saving tools.
Are you producing PDF files? If so, using Word removes a boat load of
time-saving automatic tools for indexing, hypertext linking, and TOC
Your millage may vary.
I found that I could get it to work, but it would blow up, either on me
at a future date, or on someone else when they opened the file, and I
would have to go and fix it.
Scott
Jon Harvey wrote:
> I don't use the latest version of Word but Word 2003 had a pretty good,
>
I think it's also telling that corporations don't normally train you on
"New" GUI in an app. IT tosses it over the fence and the user has to
cope on their own without much support at all, and little documentation.
This video isn't useful to most users. It isn't available to most users.
I think
Check that the styles with numbering formats that fall between those
tables are replicating the proper stream. Someone is either off a
placeholder, or resetting your numbers.
Scott
Eva Whitley wrote:
> First off, thanks to all those who helped me with my document containing
> both 81/2"x11"
I would note, that while the series letter is very important, and will
regularize the numbering stream, it seems likely that Eva is using a
single stream in order to restart the numbering sequence at the start of
each section/chapter without using a separate start style. If that is
indeed the
Richard,
I agree with simplifying, however, that may not be possible in a
corporate environement with numerous documents that use the same
template. Without a lot of effort.
The reasoning behind using a reset of the stream by a previous paragraph
number is to automate the numbering without
I would say that it's more common to the operating system. The more you
have going on in your background the more time Windows takes to do
installs. And my experience has always been for long install times on
Windows. I believe it to be a function of how the OS is structured and
the registry.
I can second Amnon's statement. It is stable, and fully functional. The
only caveat is that you need the maximum RAM to operate smoothly. The
good news is that if you purchase your RAM from a company other than
Apple you will be able to conserve on your expenditure. The RAM is
vital. You will
First question, what size paper is the document or PDF?
Second question, what size paper are you printing to?
If they are the same size, then you won't see the registration marks.
Scott
On 12/4/09 7:00 PM, Branam, Linda C wrote:
>
> I wanted registration marks to appear on my PDF version of
Again we are hoist upon Microsofts petard. Microsoft has NEVER been able
to print CMYK. Only Linux and the Mac platform have handled it well.
Scott
On 12/9/09 9:33 AM, Jacob Sch?ffer wrote:
> Unfortunately the "Save As PDF" function in FM9 has some problems with the
> font handling engine.
Technically true, Jacob.
However, why didn't Microsoft make it easy on everyone in the first
place, since on inception of their OS printing was the major output? Why
in the past 20 years didn't they correct their arrogant assumption that
RGB was the only color output scheme that was needed?
A
I agree with the other two posters. Go from your source document to
Word. It's much much easier. And then run from this client. The problems
of maintaining the drawing in an updated format, and 2000 pages with, I
assume, an index and table of contents, would be very, very daunting if
done in
I think that you should find out if they are creating SGML/XML files. If
they are, then you need only save in that format. Saving in FM binary
format wouldn't be necessary.
If they are using FM binary then you can save backwards, or as MIF.
Again if they are working in structured formats then
You must change your printer instance to the Postscript printer, and
then print your book to file. Your result will be a .ps (postscript)
file. This is the file you will distill.
The Save as PDF option is the least reliable manner of making a PDF
file. It's quick, but it doesn't allow the
I always use turn sampling off, and use ZIP compression. That seems to
give me the optimized setting for PDF file quality vs. size.
Scott
Joseph wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> When I print a framemaker book, I first save it as a PS file and then use
> acrobat distiller to transform the PS file into a
Your heading 1 should have the numbering stream set as follows:
H:< =0>< =0>
This increments your heading 1 and sets following heading 2 and heading
3 to zero.
heading 2:
H:.< =0>
heading 3:
H:..
You should have a leading paragraph in each chapter that resets your
numbering
Jeremey speaks with much truthiness! Fulsome truthiness.
Mention the cost of maintenance to keep it working correctly, and the
rate, and you may indeed get them to recant this heresy! Or get a
lucrative gig.
Scott
At 6:20 PM -0800 1/9/09, Jeremy H. Griffith wrote:
>On Fri, 09 Jan 2009
Exactly! Gary has hit it on the head. What you are referring to
doing, Hedley, is operating in a structured environment. Outlining is
an early method used to provide structure to data. SGML and XML are
later methods to do that.
FrameMaker in Structured mode does it quite well.
Scott
At 8:29
I would categorize this a perceived gains, capabilities, and costs.
One very big gain and capability that structured documents give you
is the ability to require only certain structures to fit after other
structures.
I can't comment on the capability of Enhance to require a specific
Avi,
Don't use the Save as PDF. Print to a PS file and distill that. The Save
As PDF function is problematic. If you have Distiller open and print the
PS file to a watched folder, then it will automatically begin distilling
once the file is present. Additionally, Save As PDF doesn't use the
Richard is correct in that Adobe changed the name of the printer
instance, and you should always be using that as your default printer
for FrameMaker. That might make Save As PDF function as you wish.
However, it is not the Distiller application. That application is the
sure way of making all
If only to pour gas on the fire:
If you specifically state that the workflow includes FM, then it's a
legal question.
If it wasn't clear to readers here, then your communication wasn't
adequate for your question. Problems always need complete disclosure of
means and variables.
As for Flare,
I think that this can be done, but I was under the impression that it
required XML. I may be mistaken. You should check the Adobe.com forums.
There is an Accessibility user group there.
Scott
Madeleine r Dimond wrote:
> We're beginning to make our documents accessible, and we'd like to work in
In essence, both can do what you want. Structured language is easier to
manage, but more difficult and expensive to initiate. Conditional text
will work, you have to know what conditions are exclusive, which are
inclusive with which scenarios, and structure the conditions that way.
It can be
To be truthful, the best ways to import a Word doc or export a word doc
has been through the Japanese RTF filter, and by using MIF2Go.
Scott
Gay Alson wrote:
> I've been monitoring various threads during FM 9.0's maturation process.
> Before upgrading, would appreciate advice or comments from
Diana,
How are you putting the graphics inline with the text?
When I've done this, I found that putting the anchor point on the same
line separated by an enspace worked for me.
Scott
Diana Stock wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> Feel silly asking what probably is basic to the List, but I was
>
I will jump in and mention that to avoid a deadline being missed, it's
appropriate to make certain you estimate ENOUGH time to do the job.
What you are presenting is something that I would not contemplate in a
couple of days.
For a two books to be combined, both approximately 100 pages, and if
It better to estimate the worst case, rather than best case scenario.
You could find that your conversion/merge goes much faster, in which
case you are a hero. If you estimate too little and miss your delivery
date, you are a villain.
If they go to Word, then there won't be any sharing of
Makes you wonder if he understands what distributed computing means. He
can walk over to the user's computer, manually give the user Admin
rights, install the software, and then downgrade the user rights.
THAT is the solution that he has. Waiting for anything else is lunacy. I
wish him well in
As long as you use binary files you will not be able to get differenced
files. Subversion is similar to CVS.
It handles text files very well and will difference them, just like CVS.
If you don't use text files, and all of your FM files are binary, then
you will maintain a separate copy of
So does the DTD include anything for conditional text? An attribute
setting that can be used?
Scott
Stamm, David-P45904 wrote:
> 2009-09-29-02T12:25Z
>
> Thanks to all who responded, naming (only the first five in order of
> receipt): Alan Houser, Sarah O'Keefe, Bodvar Bjorgvinsson, Nadine
It's just that having an MBA doesn't automatically qualify you to lead
or even manage a company. The people in charge nowdays have lost sight
of what their bottom line is. They rely solely upon the bean counters to
tell them, when that is only the current line expense.
I'm waiting for the
Just avoid Flare.
I wonder about products lime Serena, et al.
Scott
On 4/24/10 10:16 AM, Joseph Lorenzini wrote:
>
> I know there are products out there that do this already. The only reason I
> haven't gone over to them is product lock in. One of these days, the product
> lock in is going to
On 4/26/10 7:07 AM, Chris Despopoulos wrote:
> And with desktop software. The next wave (you heard it here) is servers and
> services. Currently, the software innovation I'm aware of is in managing
> networks, whether managing an array of devices and applications, streams of
> financial
You can always use ISO9660 format. Roxio has Roxio Creator 2010 which
should do this.
But on the whole, no, there are very few Windows programs that will
format HFS+ format, if any. Windows programs are inherently limited and
narrow visioned as far as format is concerned.
Of course the Mac
On 7/8/10 12:50 PM, LW White wrote:
The difficult part is taking the EDD and putting in your formatting
rules. Once you do that it works great. Also, you can convert a flat
document to structured. I've played with that, and once you figure it
out its golden. Though for a single document, it
I rather find the apology that Word can be made to function reliably
ONLY IF one reprograms it to be begging the question. It is usually
thought that one buys software that functions without the user having to
fix the program they just spent a few hundred dollars on.
Scott
On 6/3/10 12:35 PM,
Optimal will be a Core-duo 2.66MHz or 3 and above.
If you are running Win 7 which you should rather than Vista, try to go
for 64-bit. 32-bit will work fine. Max your RAM 4 GB would be good,
though with 64-bit you could actually use more. And a humongous hard
drive. Look for 1 TB as a good
Basic question here, you are using referenced files aren't you?
If the files are the same resolution and size as the originals then the
swap is automatic and seamless. If you have cropped the originals, then
you must do the same for the new files. I'd do any cropping on the files
outside of
It is my opinion that the Escape sequences work better, and are more
easily remembered, rather than using the relatively unituitive
Windows or Mac keystrokes.
Scott
At 2:18 PM -0700 6/26/07, Pat Christenson wrote:
>I've been using Windows keyboard commands on Parallels/Mac with no
>problem.
Its as valid as any officer of a company doing something for worse
reasons. His justification may not be exemplary, however it is not
malfeasance. Since it is somewhere around the middle ground I see no
reason to take him to task for it.
Scott
At 5:38 AM -0800 3/1/07, John Posada wrote:
> >
Yes it is feasible. It has some serious problems that may occur.
The file that you import will need a lot of
clean-up, depending upon what inconsistancies are
introduced during editing.
Scott
At 3:04 PM +0100 3/1/07, Studio Smalbro wrote:
>Would anybody have any experience running a
Considering that Microsoft couldn't seem to port Internet Explorer to
OS X, it must be insurmountable.
Scott
At 5:12 PM + 3/1/07, Paul Findon wrote:
>Steve Rickaby wrote:
>
>> >"Although MacOS X has UNIX underpinnings, the difficult
>>>stuff relating to user interfaces, font access,
It's basically the same reasons that they decided that they didn't
want to do it in the first place, several years ago. The real reason
is that the user base was too small for their desired ROI.
I suppose that the only way Adobe could put this to bed would be to
display their figures on
At 9:40 AM + 3/2/07, Gordon McLean wrote:
>Sales figures will reveal the story.
>
>What sells more, Photoshop or FrameMaker?
>
>*yawns*
>
>Gordon
Precisely, and you should be prepared for the day when FrameMaker is
killed off by Adobe. If this tool is important to you, you should be
very,
At 9:37 AM -0600 3/2/07, Sam Beard wrote:
>Scott,
>
>This isn't exactly true. Microsoft CHOSE not to export IE for Mac OS
>X. This was done partly because Apple has their own browser, Safari, and
>partly because of the rise in popularity of Firefox, Opera, Camino, and
>others. The last version
At 8:29 PM -0500 3/4/07, Sean Pollock wrote:
>Why be afraid of Frame's possible demise? XML is the future, and Frame is
>just a tool, and should never be the source. There will be (actually,
>already are) new tools, Frame ain't all that anyway. Seems like I've been
>using it forever--I look
Gillian,
Your VP doesn't want one those jobs done. There are more than enough
man-hours to be full-time at either one of those positions. So which
doesn't he want done, translation or training?
Robert McNamara insisted on making the F111 a triple mission
aircraft, reconnaissance, fighter,
Yes, there is a better way. But they have decided not to go that route.
MIF2Go is the best way to translate to RTF.
DO NOT USE Word's master document. It has been broken since inception. Y
can make it function properly, but it requires the user to follow proced ure
extermely
At 3:38 PM -0400 5/30/07, ActionA at aol.com wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>1. Convert the unstructured Frame documents by:
>a. Creating a conversion table
>b. Once I apply the conversion table to the unstructured files, I need to
>manually tweak the document to finish any left over problems.
You need to
Though if you have an Intel Mac an upgrade to OS X 10.5 will give you Bootcamp,
and the ability to run Windows
natively. I know that begs the question, as then you have to have a copy of
Windows, and a copy of FM for Windows. At
least it allows you to move back and forth. The other method is
I have found that when using a numbering stream
it is best to put ALL placeholders in. Therefore
your formats should read:
H1 A:<$chapnum>.< =0>< =0>
H2 A:<$chapnum>..< =0>
H3 A:<$chapnum>...
Additionally, ensure that you haven't used this
number stream with the desginator (in my
Ahhh, well, we all have had these little lapses
in memory. At least it wasn't as bad as
forgetting to plug-in the computer before you
called the help desk. mea culpa.
Scott
At 1:11 PM + 8/19/08, Bodvar Bjorgvinsson wrote:
>Sorry, all. I forgot that I had set Klaus M?ller's handy itl
It's been years since I've used this and I've inherited several docs
that now use cross-references to another document. Since they are
cross-referncing a heading in another document in FrameMaker the
hypertext link is to that chapter file.
In the PDF this is resolving out to an absolute path
Don't include the *TOC tags in your generation of PDFs. You can
choose which ones during your setup for PDF markers to include or
exclude.
Scott
At 1:54 PM -0500 12/4/08, Duncan, Gary wrote:
>Hi everyone,
>
>
>
>We create PDFs from Frame sources and include PDF bookmarks for chapter
>titles
At 1:53 PM -0600 12/9/08, Donald M Rinderknecht wrote:
>Hi Gillian,
>
>Other than the diff report (which I assume provides more details than
>just a time/date stamp) is SVN useful?
>
>I've been wanting some centralized document management for our
>FrameMaker (and other) files for a long time. We
Nancy,
In this instance you can eat your cake, and have it too.
In the book file, select the TOC file and from the menu select
Format > Document > Numbering, then select the Chapter tab. Select
Text format, and type your text in it. In this case TOC. Or whatever
you want. This value will be
If you use a specific template file for the first chapter, the first
Appendix, and one for Index, Glossary, and TOC, and a one for the
following chapter files and following Appendix files, you can set the
Document numbering for each and don't have to mess with them again.
They will
We use TortiseSVN and FrameMaker.
The only files sent to the repository are the source FM files, the
graphic files, and the PDF file. All others, (*.backup, PS files,
etc.) are not included.
Scott
At 12:27 PM + 12/15/08, Bodvar Bjorgvinsson wrote:
>I don't seem to find any list committed
I am beset with a particularly clueless implementation of
Accessibility requirements. The company I work for is required to
support Section 508, yet the instructions they have produced are
basically waving their hands over the subject without concrete
guidelines. So I'm having to define these
In a word. No.
Why can't you save it in FM 7.2 format? FM 8.0 can do that.
Scott
At 3:18 AM -0600 12/15/08, Kamen, Sara wrote:
>Hi listers,
>
>I have a new FrameMaker 8.0 license (not an upgrade), but for a specific
>project, I require FM 7.2.
>
>If I uninstall FM 8.0, can I use the same
The only way to do this effectively is to save all the files as MIF,
then run a grep program to search and replace the characters that get
stripped out with an acceptable character or to remove it. If your
grep program is capable you can do an internal search of the MIF
files (they are text)
The answer is many fold, but you should first understand that anytime
you place visual formatting or organization on a document you have
established the basic elements of structuring.
With no expertise or knowledge of structured language, it would be
cheaper, faster, and easier for you to have
Sorry to say, I don't think that there is an easy way to collect the
Alternate Text. You might try saving as MIF and see if that does it.
Then you'd at least be able to spell check from a text editor.
I don't think there is a way to set the language outside of the PDF itself.
Scott
At 6:33 PM
Yes, using Silicon Prairie Software's Paragraph Tools is the
easiest way to convert on tag to another.
Scott
At 1:25 PM -0800 2/22/08, Jennifer Randel wrote:
>Hi all,
>Wouldn't it be just as easy to use Silicon Prairie Software's
>Paragraph Tools as it is to create that macro?
>
>~Jennifer
Basically they are incompetent with either tool, and your worst case scenario
is that they are hopeless.
This is what expert staff is supposed to do.
I once had an employer comment on a recommendation to switch to structured
Frame, since I was the only expert they had, with "...what do we do
I have been waiting with baited breath ever since the rumors of MadCap Blaze
came forth, that a replacement to
FrameMaker was in the works. I just downloaded the public beta.
Has anyone else done so? If so I wonder if anyone else shares my disappointment.
Blaze appears to be a variant of
For a product that is supposedly Print oriented, HTML is a lousy
media to produce it in. There is no reason to use HTML. Even XHTML is
not the best route, nor is XML. While HTML and XHTML are presentation
based, they don't allow the same type of easy manipulation that
FrameMaker or even Word
The problem is that XML and by extention XHTML describe content, not
presentation or formatting. HTML is designed to present data in a
formatted state (XHTML is designed to allow the content author to
define the structure and presentation). But HTML does not have the
control built into it for
Truthfully, I'd use Oxygen rather than Blaze for an XHTML editor. Or
I'd use a couple of other apps, which even when taken as a group are
less expensive than would be Blaze. And have a learning curve that
isn't as steep. The requirement to design isn't one that I would give
to all authors,
The Frame search (wild card) feature is based upon grep. It's not a
real implementation, or a full implementation in any stretch of the
imagination. It's not fully documented as a search engine because
it's only a small feature of the program.
However, if you spend sometime studying how grep
Klaus,
You are correct. I ascribed the full features of
grep to the FrameMaker wildcard search. There is
no way to make a full pattern search with
wildcards, though you can approximate it, and you
will get some false positives. And you cannot
replace the pattern with another pattern, you
It would also help if you use a Character Tag for the formatting of
that special formatting.
Remember that the formatting of your unstructured FrameMaker should
actually follow structured rules. You should not be using overrides.
If you format in a structured manner, then when you convert to
Look at Silicon Prairie Software's Paragraph's Tool.
http://www.siliconprairiesoftware.com/
It will do batch tag replacement. And it's extremely cost effective.
Scott
At 1:11 PM -0400 10/27/08, Charles Beck wrote:
>I am aware of several cleanup tools that allow you to clean up an
>entire
I'd say that S and S+ are duplicates if they both behave the same.
And further I'd reformat the template so that you only have one tag
for numbering at that level. The reste for the numbering being in the
body, heading, and other tags. It's much more elegant, and removes
the problem of missing
However, XML and HTML don't use a separate tag to start a numbering
list. It simplifies the conversion. And if using XML it is the
preferred way to format your markup. Less problems in indicating the
first point of the numbering stream.
Scott
At 4:37 PM -0400 10/28/08, Lin Sims wrote:
>On
They are two entirely different animals. The marketing hoopla from
MadCap would have you believe that Flare is a direct competitor to
FrameMaker. This is not true.
MadCap products are transformational tools, primarily. Their entire
cause for being was centered around transforming formatted
Is it a Postscript font, OpenType or TrueType font? What is your
current screen resolution?
Scott
At 11:47 AM -0400 10/31/08, Joel wrote:
>I'm asking this again because I've had no replies:
>
>I'm on Frame 8, Win XP. The Adobe fonts are showing up terribly in Frame.
>Myriad Pro, for example, is
As far as I can tell, it still isn't going head to head with
FrameMaker. It's still aimed at layout, magazines, brochures, and
layout intensive markets, not technical writing.
Scott
At 11:03 AM +0100 9/3/08, Paul Findon wrote:
>Adobe to unveil CS4 on 23 September.
>
>Will InDesign CS4 be a
This is a default behavior in FrameMaker, and one that many users detest.
Fortunately, the programmers made it a behavior that can be customized.
Open the Maker.ini file in your FrameMaker directory.
Search for the string ClipboardFormatsPriorities
The list of formats behind this property
I like this one also, for two reasons, it's simple, and it's inexpensive.
That makes this tool VERY cost-effective.
Scott
At 8:05 AM -0500 9/4/08, Michael O'Neill wrote:
>I use Index Tools Professional from Silicon Prairie Software. By and
>large, I am happy with it. It has sped up indexing
I wouldn't advise anyone to use MSXML. It's a proprietary format. I
know, that's an oxymoron in conjunction with XML in general, but it's
true. Add to that Microsoft's penchant for adding extraneous,
gratuitous, and bloated code to it's conversion output and it would
seem counter-productive
You have more confidence in Microsoft than I do then.
Scott
At 10:16 AM -0400 9/4/08, martin.smith at golehtek.com wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Rick isn't talking about using the Word XML document format in this
>case. He is talking about using the MSXML Active X control that is
>built into windows.
>
I'd make a table format and set it up that way. Then you don't have
any manual operations other than adding an additional row cell to
break across pages.
Scott
At 2:08 PM -0400 9/12/08, Art Campbell wrote:
>The way I'd deal with it is your table method. The usual way to allow
>or force
Your post confuses me a bit. As I read it, you have two separate
columns on the page, do you mean your master page has two columns?
If so, then the run-in headings won't work. If you are using a single
column master page with a run-in heading and a paragraph following
it, then Stuart's comment
Sarah,
Every time I try the demo of InDesign I can't get past the part where
I make a page and look for where the text entry starts. As in, where
is the cursor for text?
It still feels like a page layout program, it still acts like a page
layout program, it still wants you to obsess over page
Sarah,
As a final thought, I'll add this. Any tool that won't automatically
add pages to the text flow when I come to the end of a page is an
automatic no-go. If I have to add text boxes to the page in order to
enter text, it's a no-go.
Even Adobe compares it against Xpress, and NOT
It's still not ready for prime time. At least not for technical documentation.
It's still an Xpress style layout program for magazines and brochures, not long
documents. The paradigm of it's tools and how you go about things are based
upon the paste up board of a graphic designer. Don't tell me
I'm sorry to report that after doing the procedure you listed below,
I still couldn't enter text without drawing a text box within the
margins. This is exactly why it isn't more than a page layout
program. It fails to provide me with a default page that can be used
to write upon without having
At 3:58 PM -0700 4/13/06, Pat Christenson wrote:
>The NY Times had an article today about Parallels Workstation, a
>beta software that allows you to run OS X and Windows (any version,
>not just XP) simultaneously on an intel-powered Mac. You don't have
>to reboot when you switch. You can
At 12:09 PM +0100 4/30/06, Steve Rickaby wrote:
>At 20:12 -0700 29/4/06, Dov Isaacs wrote:
>
>>That piece is total and ridiculous speculation on his part.
>
>Of course it is - Cringley is paid to do just that. It's load of fun, too.
>
>>And it just won't happen! A very large number of Adobe
I would suggest using the Unix keyboard shortcuts since they use
escape and control. They are also very complete.
At 6:20 PM -0700 5/9/06, Pat Christenson wrote:
>Hi all -
>
>I love keyboard shortcuts. On Windows, I use the Alt-first initial
>of the menu-first initial of the command shortcuts
At 6:41 PM -0800 3/9/06, Pat Christenson wrote:
>Does anyone know which driver to use when running under Mac OS X/Classic?
>
>Thanks.
>
>Pat
>
>On Mar 9, 2006, at 2:22 PM, Doug wrote:
>
>>MS Intellimouse driver version 4.1 works great, though Freewheel is
>>just as good, and isn't Microsoft.
>>
At 12:47 PM -0600 9/5/06, Tammy.VanBoening at jeppesen.com wrote:
>My bad - as a technical writer, I should have been much more clear - she
>is being told that Framemaker is going bye-bye at her organization because
>the powers that be insist Rational Soda will do the same thing - not
>Framemaker
You could use a MIF converter. Though if it were only for a few pages
wi the Ma save it out for result in parargraph tags r instructions.
Scott
On Fri Apr 20 11:15 , Pat Christenson sent:
Hi all -
I have a client who wants to import HTML docs into
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo