I'm wondering if anyone has had any success in mounting an NFS export
from a Mac OS X machine on FreeBSD 7.2? When I try, I get:
RPCPROG_MNT: RPC: Authentication error; why = Client credential too weak
The man page for exports on Mac OS X has:
-sec=mechanism1:mechanism2... This option
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 3:20 PM, patrickgibblert...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm wondering if anyone has had any success in mounting an NFS export
from a Mac OS X machine on FreeBSD 7.2? When I try, I get:
RPCPROG_MNT: RPC: Authentication error; why = Client credential too weak
The man page
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 03:20:37PM -0700, patrick wrote:
I'm wondering if anyone has had any success in mounting an NFS export
from a Mac OS X machine on FreeBSD 7.2?
amd$ ssh b...@ibook
Password:
Last login: Tue Sep 1 18:36:19 2009
Welcome to Darwin!
ibook:~ book$ uname -a
Darwin
Charles Howse wrote:
Anyone know of a command-line program that will pop-up a window on my
Mac with a message from FreeBSD?
If you're running an X server on your Mac (Xorg, XFree86),
then you can use the xmessage(1) tool, with the $DISPLAY
variable set appropriately. It can even be used to
Hi,
Anyone know of a command-line program that will pop-up a window on my
Mac with a message from FreeBSD?
If you ever used earlier versions of Windows, there was 'net
send' ('course, that was Windows to Windows).
I'd like to find something that I can script to send a lan IM, for
example:
Charles Howse wrote:
Hi,
Anyone know of a command-line program that will pop-up a window on my
Mac with a message from FreeBSD?
If you ever used earlier versions of Windows, there was 'net send'
('course, that was Windows to Windows).
I'd like to find something that I can script to send a
On Apr 1, 2009, at 3:15 PM, Terry wrote:
Charles Howse wrote:
Hi,
Anyone know of a command-line program that will pop-up a window on
my Mac with a message from FreeBSD?
If you ever used earlier versions of Windows, there was 'net
send' ('course, that was Windows to Windows).
smbclient
Most FreeBSD kernels let you set a flag(?) to decide whether chflags
noschg will work in multi-user mode.
How do I do this w/ Mac OS X? Here's what happens when I do chflags
noschg in multi-user mode:
# chflags noschg test.txt
chflags: test.txt: Operation not permitted
The opposite, chflags
On 04/07/07, Kelly Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most FreeBSD kernels let you set a flag(?) to decide whether chflags
noschg will work in multi-user mode.
How do I do this w/ Mac OS X? Here's what happens when I do chflags
noschg in multi-user mode:
# chflags noschg test.txt
chflags: test.txt
I also realize I can boot into single-user mode
(http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=106388) where chflags
noschg works just fine, but I'd like to use noschg more as advisory
protection from myself, not something that requires single-user mode
to undo.
Too bad but the schg flag is
Has anyone setup (fdisk/newfs) a drive to work on both Mac OS X and
FreeBSD? I'd like to be able to transfer larger datasets between my Mac
and my FreeBSD laptop without using my network.
Thanks in advance
-- Chris
--
__o All I was doing was trying to get home from work
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007, Christopher Hilton wrote:
Has anyone setup (fdisk/newfs) a drive to work on both Mac OS X and
FreeBSD? I'd like to be able to transfer larger datasets between my Mac
and my FreeBSD laptop without using my network.
I think that the M$ file system on most external disk
I've seen lots of iridium flare prediction software that's
graphics-based, but is there any that can be run from the command
line?
I want to run the predictor as a cron job and pipe the output to a
Perl script, for example.
I'm running Mac OS X, but if I can get the source of anything that
runs
I sent it.
So, basically the Apple team took FreeBSD and the CM micro-kernel,
combined them, made some improvements and added some additional code
and then used it all as the MAC OS X core (without the GUI of course)?
Yes, basically. FreeBSD is free for the taking, so Apple took. Steve
Jobs
on the mailing list, but
unfortunately it occurred to me after I sent it.
So, basically the Apple team took FreeBSD and the CM micro-kernel,
combined them, made some improvements and added some additional code
and then used it all as the MAC OS X core (without the GUI of course)?
Yes
On Dec 11, 2006, at 2:27 AM, lveax wrote:
who are the people that works in apple and also a freebsd developer
now?
Jordan Hubbard and Wilfredo Sanchez come to mind, and maybe Garance
Drosihn would also qualify, as I think he was part of Apple's darwin-
developers, IIRC. There are others.
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 10:56:17PM -0600, Chuck Remes wrote:
Also, please recall I said most software and not 100% of software.
I am certain there are outliers that don't compile cleanly on OSX,
but that hardly proves that OSX is not a good UNIX target. The vast
majority of software
David Kelly wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 10:56:17PM -0600, Chuck Remes wrote:
Also, please recall I said most software and not 100% of software.
I am certain there are outliers that don't compile cleanly on OSX,
but that hardly proves that OSX is not a good UNIX target. The vast
- Original Message -
From: Lonnie Cumberland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 3:48 AM
Subject: Re: MAC OS X connection to FreeBSD?
Thanks everyone for the replay to my post as it did finally occur
, 2006 3:48 AM
Subject: Re: MAC OS X connection to FreeBSD?
Thanks everyone for the replay to my post as it did finally occur
to me
that perhaps this question had been asked on the mailing list, but
unfortunately it occurred to me after I sent it.
So, basically the Apple team took FreeBSD
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 01:28:16AM -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
No, they used it all as the Darwin core. Then they took Darwin and
added their own GUI (used to be called Aqua) and that is MacOSX.
X11 also comes on the MacOS X DVD, but is not installed by default.
Bear in mind that the
Greetings All,
I really appreciate all of the feedback and reply posts regaring my
inquiry about Darwin and FreeBSD.
I am still somewhat confused as I have been looking at FreeBSD which I
think is VERY good and have also recently been able to boot up the
OpenDarwin 7.2.1 as well, but never could
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 09:03:20AM -0600, Lonnie Cumberland wrote:
I am still somewhat confused as I have been looking at FreeBSD which I
think is VERY good and have also recently been able to boot up the
OpenDarwin 7.2.1 as well, but never could get the Darwin 8.1 cdrom to
install.
If your
On Nov 13, 2006, at 01:28, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Apple also doesen't use the UNIX security model. As near as I can
tell their core security model is an ACL model not a user/group model.
Once again this is something that's handled elsewhere.
The user-group security model is alive and the
David Kelly wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 09:03:20AM -0600, Lonnie Cumberland wrote:
I am still somewhat confused as I have been looking at FreeBSD which I
think is VERY good and have also recently been able to boot up the
OpenDarwin 7.2.1 as well, but never could get the Darwin 8.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lonnie Cumberland wrote:
Greetings All,
I really appreciate all of the feedback and reply posts regaring my
inquiry about Darwin and FreeBSD.
I am still somewhat confused as I have been looking at FreeBSD which I
think is VERY good and have
The biggest problem with MacOS X is that a lot of UNIX software that
runs on FreeBSD and such, is not ported to MacOSX, and it's very
difficult to compile on MacOSX.
This is completely wrong. Take a look at macports [1] (formerly
darwinports) for a large repository of UNIX software that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lorin Lund wrote:
The biggest problem with MacOS X is that a lot of UNIX software that
runs on FreeBSD and such, is not ported to MacOSX, and it's very
difficult to compile on MacOSX.
This is completely wrong. Take a look at macports [1]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Garrett Cooper wrote:
Lorin Lund wrote:
The biggest problem with MacOS X is that a lot of UNIX software that
runs on FreeBSD and such, is not ported to MacOSX, and it's very
difficult to compile on MacOSX.
This is completely wrong. Take a look at
On Nov 13, 2006, at 7:02 PM, Lorin Lund wrote:
The biggest problem with MacOS X is that a lot of UNIX software that
runs on FreeBSD and such, is not ported to MacOSX, and it's very
difficult to compile on MacOSX.
This is completely wrong. Take a look at macports [1] (formerly
-kernel,
combined them, made some improvements and added some additional code and
then used it all as the MAC OS X core (without the GUI of course)?
A little bit of info:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XNU
I'll let others comment on its correctness.
With this being said, then does anyone have
and added some additional code and
then used it all as the MAC OS X core (without the GUI of course)?
With this being said, then does anyone have any experience with the
stability and performance?
My guess is that if it is really based upon FreeBSD then the performance
should be pretty good
FreeBSD and the CM micro-kernel,
combined them, made some improvements and added some additional code
and then used it all as the MAC OS X core (without the GUI of course)?
Yes, basically. FreeBSD is free for the taking, so Apple took. Steve
Jobs' NeXT team had a lot of familiarity with Mach, so
David Kelly writes:
Yes, basically. FreeBSD is free for the taking, so Apple
took. Steve Jobs' NeXT team had a lot of familiarity with Mach,
so they took from there also too. A good number of well known
FreeBSD people now work for Apple, there are a number of FreeBSD
device drivers
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 10:41:28AM -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
David Kelly writes:
Yes, basically. FreeBSD is free for the taking, so Apple
took. Steve Jobs' NeXT team had a lot of familiarity with Mach,
so they took from there also too. A good number of well known
FreeBSD people
and the CM micro-kernel,
combined them, made some improvements and added some additional
code and then used it all as the MAC OS X core (without the GUI of
course)?
As others have discussed, the Apple devs took the FreeBSD userland
and CM micro-kernel, combined them, provided quite a few bug
,
and Opensolaris.
From what I have found, FreeBSD seems to be at the very top in almost
every way.
In my Internet travels, I came across a site that has this MAC OS X (
which I guess is called Darwin?) at:
http://developer.apple.com/opensource/index.html
and have noticed that they seem to have
operating systems like Linux (Fedora, Gentoo, etc..), OpenBSD, NetBSD,
and Opensolaris.
From what I have found, FreeBSD seems to be at the very top in almost
every way.
In my Internet travels, I came across a site that has this MAC OS X (
which I guess is called Darwin?) at:
http
..), OpenBSD, NetBSD,
and Opensolaris.
From what I have found, FreeBSD seems to be at the very top in almost
every way.
In my Internet travels, I came across a site that has this MAC OS X (
which I guess is called Darwin?) at:
http://developer.apple.com/opensource/index.html
and have noticed
as compared to other
operating systems like Linux (Fedora, Gentoo, etc..), OpenBSD, NetBSD,
and Opensolaris.
From what I have found, FreeBSD seems to be at the very top in almost
every way.
In my Internet travels, I came across a site that has this MAC OS X (
which I guess is called Darwin
I've been messing about with FreeBSD lately, though mostly I
use Mac OS X. I've grown accustomed to using less as a pager,
generally preferring the manner in which it would make all the
scrolled through crud vanish when I was done pawing about in
it. But less didn't behave that way when telnet'd
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 02:26:07PM -0700, Walt Pawley wrote:
I've been messing about with FreeBSD lately, though mostly I
use Mac OS X. I've grown accustomed to using less as a pager,
generally preferring the manner in which it would make all the
scrolled through crud vanish when I was done
It says:
import _imaging # dynamically loaded from
/usr/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/PIL/_imaging.so
what now?
I know I'm not python savvy, so thx for helping
How do I interpret this.Fredrik Lundh wrote:
Josh Stephenson wrote:
I'm running an intel mac 10.4 with python 2.4.2 and
OpenBSD code in their SFU.
Kind regards,
Alex.
rogeriocordeiro wrote:
Hello!
I am new to FreeBSD and I have some questions regard the licensing.
My question is regarding using FreeBSD for profit?
Ex. Mac OS X is based on FreeBSD 5.X.
Is this allowed or not and if so what are the requirements.
I
development of the Darwin core of Mac OS X. Another words, Darwin is
the UNIX underlying part of OS X. Its a different operating system.
Apple uses code from FreeBSD, but its much different. In fact, parts
of the darwin kernel are written in C++ whereas the FreeBSD kernel is
written in C
Hello!
I am new to FreeBSD and I have some questions regard the licensing.
My question is regarding using FreeBSD for profit?
Ex. Mac OS X is based on FreeBSD 5.X.
Is this allowed or not and if so what are the requirements.
I have read the public license and I would have to say
is
aware of a good counterpart to this list for Mac OS X. Possibly
even containing people from this list who've moved to a Mac? I just
moved my primary workstation to a PowerBook G4 and I'm starting to
have some techie questions that I can't quite figure out.
If you want to post to a Mac list, I
On Sep 26, 2004, at 8:56 PM, Eric Crist wrote:
Sorry for the off-topic question. I was wondering if anyone is aware
of a good counterpart to this list for Mac OS X. Possibly even
containing people from this list who've moved to a Mac? I just moved
my primary workstation to a PowerBook G4
I'm attempting to get PPTP set up between a Mac OS X 10.3.3 client using
the VPN tool in Internet Connect and a FreeBSD 4.10-BETA box running mpd.
I don't have a whole lot of experience with this, so it could well be I'm
doing something stupid. However, the problem seems fairly consistent
Okay. I've looked hi and lo for an answer to this and I'm not coming up
with anything useful.
I have two machines on the same network (192.168.0.x). One is an x86
running 4.9-STABLE and CUPS 1.1.19. The other is a PowerBook G4 running
Mac OS X 10.3.2 (Panther). The x86 machine has an HP laser
that changed (these folkes upgraded from OS 9
to OS X over the last few months). But the guy at the office claimed the CDs
aren't correct on OS 9 now either.
Here's the problem:
FreeBSD server that serves files up for Windows and Mac OS X machines
(using Samba and Netatalk). It has a CD burner
versions of the software you're running. What version of
netatalk are you running? how about mkisofs?
Here's the problem:
FreeBSD server that serves files up for Windows and Mac OS X machines
(using Samba and Netatalk). It has a CD burner in it that is used to
archive old projects. I have
.
Here's the problem:
FreeBSD server that serves files up for Windows and Mac OS X machines (using
Samba and Netatalk). It has a CD burner in it that is used to archive old
projects. I have a perl script written that presents a GUI that a user can
pick a directory and click a button to burn it to CD
This is baffling. I have a OS X 10.2.3 machine that can connect just
fine (as do you). The sniffer traces are more or less identical. Since
it looks like the OS X client is initiating the disconnect, can you
bring up the OS X console under Applications-Utilities-Console, and
see if any
I am running netatalk-1.6.0_1,1 from the FreeBSD ports systems on two
boxes and connecting from Mac OS X 10.2.3.
Now when I connect from one box I get the following error on the mac:
Connection failed
An AppleShare system error occurred.
I can connect to the other box without any problems
On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 18:00, Jim Arnold wrote:
I am running netatalk-1.6.0_1,1 from the FreeBSD ports systems on two
boxes and connecting from Mac OS X 10.2.3.
Now when I connect from one box I get the following error on the mac:
Connection failed
An AppleShare system error occurred
IP address of client
Note, this assumes you're connecting over TCP (which you really should
be with OS X).
Attached is the outfile as run on the FreeBSD box with the command
line from above.
tcpdump -s 1518 -w /tmp/outfile host 192.168.0.4
.4 is the Mac OS X box
I hope this is what
Do you have a custom volume icon on this server? If so, try deleting
it, then reconnection.
Nope. Nothing fancy. Just a straight install of Netatalk and I didn't
change any of the icons.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the
On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 20:40, Jim Arnold wrote:
Do you have a custom volume icon on this server? If so, try deleting
it, then reconnection.
Nope. Nothing fancy. Just a straight install of Netatalk and I didn't
change any of the icons.
When exactly do you see the message? Right after
When exactly do you see the message? Right after you login?
As soon as I hit the connect button after typing in the IP address of
the FreeBSD box or using
the afp address.
Can you
send your AppleVolumes.default
This just has the ~ (tilde) at the end so the home directory will get mounted
On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 21:56, Jim Arnold wrote:
When exactly do you see the message? Right after you login?
As soon as I hit the connect button after typing in the IP address of
the FreeBSD box or using
the afp address.
Can you
send your AppleVolumes.default
This just has the ~
This is baffling. I have a OS X 10.2.3 machine that can connect just
fine (as do you). The sniffer traces are more or less identical. Since
it looks like the OS X client is initiating the disconnect, can you
bring up the OS X console under Applications-Utilities-Console, and
see if any
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ralph
Freibeuter
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 04:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mac os x 10.2.3 jaguar and port forwarding?
Ho can I exactly define a rule (and where?) that forwards
Ralph Freibeuter wrote:
Ho can I exactly define a rule (and where?) that forwards
incoming requests to port 445 (samba?) to an internal machine
with lan ip 192.168.2.50 ?
The routing Macs IP is 192.168.2.1 and the external IP is
given by ISP via pppoe.
As someone else mentioned Darwin (aka
Ho can I exactly define a rule (and where?) that forwards
incoming requests to port 445 (samba?) to an internal machine
with lan ip 192.168.2.50 ?
The routing Macs IP is 192.168.2.1 and the external IP is
given by ISP via pppoe.
Please help me.
I've already tried:
sudo natd -redirect_port tcp
Thus spake Ralph Freibeuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ho can I exactly define a rule (and where?) that forwards
incoming requests to port 445 (samba?) to an internal machine
with lan ip 192.168.2.50 ?
The routing Macs IP is 192.168.2.1 and the external IP is
given by ISP via pppoe.
Please help
http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/ppc.html
note that it doesn't really work yet.
-Adam
(09.23.2002 @ 1029 PST): Barry Kerzner said, in 0.5K:
Dear Sir:
I am currently running MAC OS X (10.1.5) on an Apple PowerBook G4 Titanium
w/ 512MB RAM. I have a single native 30GB HDD
67 matches
Mail list logo
