??
CWSIV
--
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
Hello group,
I am playing a bit with a 8086 PC these days, and I noticed an ugly
difference on it between FreeDOS and MSDOS 3.3:
MSDOS 3.3 keeps the content of last read sectors of the diskette in a
cache, while FreeDOS does not. This means that FreeDOS is accessing the
FDD much more often
Hi,
On May 25, 2015 2:27 AM, Mateusz Viste mate...@viste.fr wrote:
Question -- is there any way I could install a diskette cache on
FreeDOS? If not supported by the kernel right away (as seems to be the
case in MSDOS), maybe some additional (preferably free) tool could help?
Unfortunately
Could this be the cause of so many diskette formatting failures in FreeDOS?
I have to resort to either booting in Compaq DOS 3.31 or using 3rd party
formatting tools such as FMT or Nformat.
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 3:26 AM, Mateusz Viste mate...@viste.fr wrote:
Hello group,
I am playing a bit
Hi,
On May 25, 2015 7:09 AM, Don Flowers donr...@gmail.com wrote:
Could this be the cause of so many diskette formatting
failures in FreeDOS? I have to resort to either booting in
Compaq DOS 3.31 or using 3rd party formatting tools such
as FMT or Nformat.
Try an older stable kernel (2038 or
With my need for the FCB filename parsing, int 21h function 29h patch I
need to use either the patched 2041 or the unofficial 2042 kernel. I do
have fewer errors with the 2042,
Typical error occurs following format:
Drive_IO(WRITE 9, count 1 ) [FAT12/16] [drive A:]
Critical error during DOS
Mateusz,
I went through my archives and found Central Point PC-Tools version 4. It
has a floppy cache called PC-Cache which should work.
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Don Flowers donr...@gmail.com wrote:
With my need for the FCB filename parsing, int 21h function 29h patch I
need to use
For a whish list It would be nice to add a version of xcopy that also
copies
hidden and system file. Also it would be nice to able to read Chinese
made UDF
cds on dos. Why do they use UDF on a read only cd; its suppose to be for
R/W cd's..
cheers
DS
On Sat, 16 May 2015 19:37:26 +0200 Mateusz
I don't understand why you guys are responding to this :)
The guy landed in my killfile many messages ago already, and the only
thing that reminds me of him are responses from others.
Please adjust your filters (or set up a ml ban, for these of you who are
able to do so).
Mateusz
On
whatever your reason is: forget it.
DONE! I spent all day yesterday setting up XFDOS and even though my time
with it was somewhat limited, I found XFDOS much easier to set up thant
OpenGEM. It is the best GUI I have seen yet. I want this to be a priority
for the primary GUI for FreeDOS.
On Wed,
Just one more wish list item, If someone could rework the RPM 2.37
Advanced Boot Manager to work with drives above 8gb and then port that into
RPM 2.44 that would be awesome.
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Rugxulo rugx...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Karen Lewellen
While recommending the Dillodos to another member, I discovered Georg
Pothast's XFDOS GUI. Maybe that could be added to the next distribution? I
will be getting familiar with it and report back (specifically is there a
way to add my most used program (Seedmaster for DOS) onto the Desktop - if
so
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Ralf Quint freedos...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/19/2015 1:00 PM, Dario Roncone wrote:
Tom F*** Y**!
You seriously need to adjust your attitude pal, there is no place for
this in here...=-O
Agreed. I just checked into the discussion, and was disappointed to see
What a killjoy! Tom it was a wish list after all from my personal
experience on FreeDOS 1.0 with the unstable kernel where crashes were few
and far between in standard mode, it seems possible if not practical.
C'est la vie! FreeDOS is not my life, just something to obsess about,
ironically
On 5/19/2015 1:00 PM, Dario Roncone wrote:
Tom F*** Y**!
You seriously need to adjust your attitude pal, there is no place for
this in here...=-O
Ralf
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
Tom Fuck You!
2015-05-19 20:22 GMT+02:00, Don Flowers donr...@gmail.com:
What a killjoy! Tom it was a wish list after all from my personal
experience on FreeDOS 1.0 with the unstable kernel where crashes were few
and far between in standard mode, it seems possible if not practical.
C'est la
My reason for wanting to use Windows 3.1 in FreeDOS is for some
very specific apps (yes among them are a couple of bible programs)
and just having access to some utilities such as Winimage Winzip,
etc. That said, since 1993 I have always had Compaq DOS/Windows 3.1
on at least one of my PCs
Re: DOS AHCI driver - My driver is AHCI.SYS. I load it then UIDE followed
by SHCDX86.COM. This is the only configuration that works. BIOS has no
option besides ACHCI,
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Eric Auer e.a...@jpberlin.de wrote:
Hi Mateusz,
as far as I know, UIDE now supports
AHCI
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 9:31 AM, Don Flowers donr...@gmail.com wrote:
Re: DOS AHCI driver - My driver is AHCI.SYS. I load it then UIDE followed
by SHCDX86.COM. This is the only configuration that works. BIOS has no
option besides ACHCI,
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Eric Auer
Hi,
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Guillem guilevi2...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been thinking of dualbooting my Windows PC with FreeDOS,
Why exactly? Although it's not a totally horrible idea, it's very
tedious and a bit technical. Not worth risking anything important. As
I told one guy
?!
2015-05-18 17:41 GMT+02:00, Dario Roncone darioronco...@gmail.com:
Great1!
2015-05-18 15:33 GMT+02:00, Don Flowers donr...@gmail.com:
AHCI
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 9:31 AM, Don Flowers donr...@gmail.com wrote:
Re: DOS AHCI driver - My driver is AHCI.SYS. I load it then UIDE
followed
Great1!
2015-05-18 15:33 GMT+02:00, Don Flowers donr...@gmail.com:
AHCI
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 9:31 AM, Don Flowers donr...@gmail.com wrote:
Re: DOS AHCI driver - My driver is AHCI.SYS. I load it then UIDE
followed
by SHCDX86.COM. This is the only configuration that works. BIOS has no
lifts hand from back of class
But that is what I seem to be missing about freedos.
I run DOS only, and have no interest in having 8 different operating
systems on my main desktop to get the job done.
I have a d-link Ethernet card. The card is very good with a ton of
drivers, including the one I
Karen, I also use the D-Link card (PCMCIA) in my home and it is an
outstanding card for DOS/FreeDOS, I get the desire to maintain a pure DOS
machine (I have one desktop and two laptops that are DOS only). Have you
tried DIllodos (the lasted build not the one in the FreeDOS repo)? Using
that, I can
Try these links
https://code.google.com/p/nanox-microwindows-nxlib-fltk-for-dos/downloads/detail?name=DILLODOS-302b.zipcan=2q=
http://freedos.10956.n7.nabble.com/New-release-of-the-Dillo-web-browser-for-DOS-td19097.html
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Karen Lewellen klewel...@shellworld.net
Hi Don,
no on that browser where Might I find it? I think I looked at the freedos
edition and it did not suit compared to what my ssh telnet options present.
Now if I could find a wireless d-link card sigh.
I do not understand what web security has to do with Dos, or browsers that
pose no
got it, thanks.
On Mon, 18 May 2015, Don Flowers wrote:
Try these links
https://code.google.com/p/nanox-microwindows-nxlib-fltk-for-dos/downloads/detail?name=DILLODOS-302b.zipcan=2q=
http://freedos.10956.n7.nabble.com/New-release-of-the-Dillo-web-browser-for-DOS-td19097.html
On Mon, May
Hi,
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:45 AM, Don Flowers donr...@gmail.com wrote:
The wiki article is good as far as it goes, I collected all the pieces of
the networking puzzle mentioned in the article, but can't seem to assemble
them correctly. My currebn method of file transfer is via USB, and I
My USB method is between the various Computers and also between Kubuntu
and FreeDOS. I was not aware of the data corruption risk from unplugging
the device, although I should have known Thanks for the tip.
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Rugxulo rugx...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, May 18,
Hi,
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Karen Lewellen
klewel...@shellworld.net wrote:
Granted, I am not using a browser directly on my computer, but this
of mouse because I cannot. it is because no one has done a dos build of Lynx
in a grand while.
Juan Manuel Guerrero did a DJGPP build
Hi,
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:42 AM, Tom Ehlert t...@drivesnapshot.de wrote:
Ability to run Windows 3.1 in 386 enhanced mode.
has been discussed multiple times. conclusion: forget it
Okay, but let's be clear here:
1). It's proprietary, so it's not redistributable.
2). It's old, so most
My reason for wanting to use Windows 3.1 in FreeDOS is for some very
specific apps (yes among them are a couple of bible programs) and just
having access to some utilities such as Winimage Winzip, etc. That said,
since 1993 I have always had Compaq DOS/Windows 3.1 on at least one of my
PCs so, I
Hi,
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Don Flowers donr...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry Mateusz,- I assumed this was well-known.
I have an Acer Aspire E5-571 laptop which has a quirky BIOS - the IDE
emulation option is specific to the hard drive only and not the CD/DVD
drive. I had though that the
and general questions about FreeDOS.
freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Sun, 17 May 2015 14:01
Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS wishlist
Dario,
Intel core DUO2 T6570@2,1Ghz 2,1Ghz RAM 2GB SO-DIMM S-ATA2 HDD 320Gb ?
Windows 7 Ultimate vers. 6.1.7601Satellite Pro Series
Hi Guillem,
On 18/05/2015 08:16, Guillem wrote:
(...) the only things that are preventing me from doing that right now are
the fact that USB serial controllers don’t work all the way (...)
So Better/wider USB support. Already on the list.
Is there any way to make some kind of driver that
About networking -- have you looked at the wiki article?
http://www.freedos.org/wiki/index.php/Networking_FreeDOS
It contains already quite a lot of informations, on many aspects of the
DOS networking world.
Mateusz
On 18/05/2015 10:52, Don Flowers wrote:
I have a HP Elite 8000 with 12gb
I have a HP Elite 8000 with 12gb RAM, I use XOSL to boot Kubuntu 14.04,
Windows 7, Compaq DOS 5.0, MS-DOS 7.10 and FreeDOS. When running Compaq DOS
and/or MS-DOS 7.10, I use the native HIMEM and Windows 3.1 runs fine in
enhanced mode; on FreeDOS even standard mode seems buggy, so it is not
The wiki article is good as far as it goes, I collected all the pieces of
the networking puzzle mentioned in the article, but can't seem to assemble
them correctly. My currebn method of file transfer is via USB, and I am
experiencing quite a bit of data corruption.
I have 3 desktops (one full
For the wish list has the AHCI/SATA issue been mentioned? I have an Acer
which will not access CDROM using GCDROM or any thing else in the FreeDOS
repo, but works only with the intel SATA driver first followed by UIDE.
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Don Flowers donr...@gmail.com wrote:
The
Ability to run Windows 3.1 in 386 enhanced mode.
has been discussed multiple times. conclusion: forget it
Tom
--
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
Widest out-of-the-box
Sorry, I don't think I have followed this AHCI/SATA issue - do you have
any reference? An URL to a past mailing list message, or a bug report on
sourceforge?
Will add it to the wishlist, I just need some reference to attach it to,
since it doesn't sound self-explanatory as you worded it.
Sorry Mateusz,- I assumed this was well-known.
I have an Acer Aspire E5-571 laptop which has a quirky BIOS - the IDE
emulation option is specific to the hard drive only and not the CD/DVD
drive. I had though that the GCDROM drive was supposed to enable a SATA
drive, but it didn't and I actually
Okay, I understand.
Have you wrote about this to Jack? He might be still interested in
GCDROM feedback, and it could be an interesting case for him perhaps.
However, the problem is larger I think anyway - today you are unable to
set your CD controller to legacy IDE mode, but tomorrow it might
Hi, just a semi-automatic reply for this classic topic ;-)
Is there any way to make some kind of driver that would sit between
the application and the actual soundcard (in my case a realtek) and
forward what the app is trying to send to the soundblaster to the
realtek the right way?
Yes
Hi Mateusz,
as far as I know, UIDE now supports harddisk and CDROM/DVD/BD
with IDE and SATA controllers, but not in AHCI mode*. Also, I
am not aware of any other DOS AHCI driver. What you can do is
using the BIOS as driver: This is normal for harddisks, but
only works for CD/DVD when you boot
Nooo Thanks!
The usb mass-stoarge driver works for me. There are no problems. And
with savepart.exe
you can Backup your HardDiskDrive With the OS, the configuration of
you OperatingSystem and your programms.
2015-05-17 9:24 GMT+02:00, Mateusz Viste mate...@viste.fr:
On 17/05/2015 09:05, Don
WiFi?
2015-05-17 11:16 GMT+02:00, Dario Roncone darioronco...@gmail.com:
Nooo Thanks!
The usb mass-stoarge driver works for me. There are no problems. And
with savepart.exe
you can Backup your HardDiskDrive With the OS, the configuration of
you OperatingSystem and your programms.
+1 for Windows 3.1 enhanced mode!
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Micheal Muniko michealmun...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ability to run Windows 3.1 in 386 enhanced mode.
--
One dashboard for servers and applications
e.a...@jpberlin.de
To: Discussion and general questions about FreeDOS.
freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Sun, 17 May 2015 14:01
Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] FreeDOS wishlist
Dario,
Intel core DUO2 T6570@2,1Ghz 2,1Ghz RAM 2GB SO-DIMM S-ATA2 HDD 320Gb ?
Windows 7 Ultimate vers
-user] FreeDOS wishlist
Dario,
Intel core DUO2 T6570@2,1Ghz 2,1Ghz RAM 2GB SO-DIMM S-ATA2 HDD 320Gb ?
Windows 7 Ultimate vers. 6.1.7601Satellite Pro Series.. Toshiba.
It´s great! Sorry!
well, what are you trying to tell us with all those
VERY short mails, that you add to much
Shit!!
2015-05-17 11:35 GMT+02:00, Dario Roncone darioronco...@gmail.com:
WiFi?
2015-05-17 11:16 GMT+02:00, Dario Roncone darioronco...@gmail.com:
Nooo Thanks!
The usb mass-stoarge driver works for me. There are no problems. And
with savepart.exe
you can Backup your HardDiskDrive With the
Ability to run Windows 3.1 in 386 enhanced mode.
--
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and
Dario,
Intel core DUO2 T6570@2,1Ghz 2,1Ghz RAM 2GB SO-DIMM S-ATA2 HDD 320Gb ?
Windows 7 Ultimate vers. 6.1.7601Satellite Pro Series.. Toshiba.
It´s great! Sorry!
well, what are you trying to tell us with all those
VERY short mails, that you add to much longer other
mails? Please
What is it ? +1 enhanced mode
FOR ?
What.. c64?
2015-05-17 19:29 GMT+02:00, Don Flowers donr...@gmail.com:
+1 for Windows 3.1 enhanced mode!
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Micheal Muniko michealmun...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ability to run Windows 3.1 in 386 enhanced mode.
Why this... ?
2015-05-17 18:38 GMT+02:00, Micheal Muniko michealmun...@gmail.com:
Ability to run Windows 3.1 in 386 enhanced mode.
--
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
Widest
Intel core DUO2 T6570@2,1Ghz 2,1Ghz RAM 2GB SO-DIMM S-ATA2 HDD 320Gb ?
Windows 7 Ultimate vers. 6.1.7601Satellite Pro Series.. Toshiba.
It´s great! Sorry!
2015-05-17 20:40 GMT+02:00, Dario Roncone darioronco...@gmail.com:
Why this... ?
2015-05-17 18:38 GMT+02:00, Micheal Muniko
I would hope that the FCBParseFname bug fix will be implemented in the
next kernel.
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Dario Roncone darioronco...@gmail.com
wrote:
www.dario-roncone.com
I must disable the picture..
2015-05-17 6:45 GMT+02:00, Dario Roncone darioronco...@gmail.com:
There is
Thanks for the clarification! So what you are saying is that you miss:
- easier/better supported USB support, at least for mass storage devices
- packet drivers for wifi cards
Both these points were already in the list on the wiki, but I made it
more specific right now.
cheers,
Mateusz
On
On 17/05/2015 09:05, Don Flowers wrote:
I would hope that the FCBParseFname bug fix will be implemented in the
next kernel.
You are referring to a specific FreeDOS bug I believe, so its place is
probably better suited on the FreeDOS bugtracker (is it there?)
Hi all,
Yesterday a post on the freedos devel list gave birth to a 'wishlist' of
things that would be needed in FreeDOS.
I repost this list here, since I am curious what other DOS users think.
If you see something missing, that is both within a reasonable technical
scope and represents a
Hi,
sorry if this has been mentioned.
I would love to have native networking so one can run wireless and or
Ethernet cards. I do understand some support exists, but last thread
indicated that it is a bit dated.
would personally let me put freedos on a laptop for road use without
compromising
On 16/05/2015 21:12, Karen Lewellen wrote:
I would love to have native networking so one can run wireless and or
Ethernet cards. I do understand some support exists, but last thread
indicated that it is a bit dated.
Hi Karen,
I'm not sure I understand what you are meaning exactly by
As an extension to the GPT item, I would like to see both the kernel and
utilities support sector sizes other than 512 bytes (at least up to 4k, anyway,
which is the standard for new hard drive technologies). This would also help
with CD/DVD support, which use a 2k sector size. It is
On 16/05/2015 20:24, Bret Johnson wrote:
As an extension to the GPT item, I would like to see both the kernel
and utilities support sector sizes other than 512 bytes (at least up to
4k, anyway, which is the standard for new hard drive technologies).
This would also help with CD/DVD support,
Hi,
clearly mixing terms, distracted when i wrote..anniversary of my dad's
death today.
I was thinking of two separate features.
Native networking allows the use of USB drives and the like without
drivers for them.
I have this working fine in ms dos using a USB driver I shared here. still
it
that´s nice
2015-05-17 5:25 GMT+02:00, Karen Lewellen klewel...@shellworld.net:
Hi,
clearly mixing terms, distracted when i wrote..anniversary of my dad's
death today.
I was thinking of two separate features.
Native networking allows the use of USB drives and the like without
drivers
YES that´s corect (-:
2015-05-17 6:29 GMT+02:00, Dario Roncone darioronco...@gmail.com:
that´s nice
2015-05-17 5:25 GMT+02:00, Karen Lewellen klewel...@shellworld.net:
Hi,
clearly mixing terms, distracted when i wrote..anniversary of my dad's
death today.
I was thinking of two separate
There is a Extended CommandShellExtension For DOS, Windows
Novelll.It´´s called 4DOS.com ? It can be usefull. (batchFiles..
2015-05-17 6:38 GMT+02:00, Dario Roncone darioronco...@gmail.com:
YES that´s corect (-:
2015-05-17 6:29 GMT+02:00, Dario Roncone darioronco...@gmail.com:
that´s
OK, thanks Eric, I'll look at staying the course with uide.
On 5/16/2015 7:38 PM, Eric Auer wrote:
Hi John,
xcdrom is quite old, there have been plenty of uide updates...
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/dos/ellis/
Eric
I learn something new everyday. So its a trail run of an OS without
any risk. I like it. I usually install everything new on a seperate CF
chip.
There isn't anything else present to damage - like windows. My
really important stuff is kept on a dos CF chip way out of the reach of a
virus.
Thanks
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:44 AM, dmccunney dennis.mccun...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://copy.sh/v86/?profile=freedos
__
Dennis
https://plus.google.com/u/0/105128793974319004519
This is interesting, not only for FreeDOS, but for other possible disk images I
can find or produce!
I briefly
There something very special about this link and I'm too ignorant to know
what it is.
What is v86?
DS
On Thu, 2 Apr 2015 14:01:29 -0400 dmccunney dennis.mccun...@gmail.com
writes:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Jim Hall jh...@freedos.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:44 AM, dmccunney
I'm thinking about adding something like this to the freedos.org website so
people can try out FreeDOS. Not sure about bandwidth and web server
requirements yet, though - so no promises. I'd be a little careful about how
I promoted that, since you couldn't actually view your promotion from
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Jim Hall jh...@freedos.org wrote:
[SNIP]
v86 is a virtual x86 emulator. It's like VirtualPC or Bochs or VMWare or
VirtualPC or QEMU or VirtualBox or any other PC emulator .. except v86 runs
entirely in your web browser. You don't need to run a local emulator.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Bret Johnson bretj...@juno.com wrote:
I'm thinking about adding something like this to the freedos.org website
so people can try out FreeDOS. Not sure about bandwidth and web server
requirements yet, though - so no promises.
I'd be a little careful about how I
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Dale E Sterner sunbeam...@juno.com wrote:
There something very special about this link and I'm too ignorant to know
what it is.
What is v86?
DS
http://copy.sh/v86/?profile=freedos
v86 is a virtual x86 emulator. It's like VirtualPC or Bochs or VMWare or
The wiki on WiFi in FreeDOS needs updating. The place it links to for the
ORiNOCO drivers is long since dead (403 forbidden). I found a mirror here:
http://ftp.ufanet.ru/pub/wireless/wavelan/DRIVERS/MS-DOS/ by searching for
WVLAN42.COM but that was the only way I even got any idea where to find
WAY COOL!
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:44 AM, dmccunney dennis.mccun...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://copy.sh/v86/?profile=freedos
__
Dennis
https://plus.google.com/u/0/105128793974319004519
--
Dive into the World of
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:44 AM, dmccunney dennis.mccun...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://copy.sh/v86/?profile=freedos
Interesting! This is a new one.
I knew about JPC (http://jpc.sourceforge.net/) and PCjs (
http://jsmachines.net/docs/pcjs/) but v86 seems to be new.
For those interested, v86 is
Wow, crazy!
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Don Flowers donr...@gmail.com wrote:
WAY COOL!
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:44 AM, dmccunney dennis.mccun...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://copy.sh/v86/?profile=freedos
__
Dennis
https://plus.google.com/u/0/105128793974319004519
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Jim Hall jh...@freedos.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:44 AM, dmccunney dennis.mccun...@gmail.com
wrote:
http://copy.sh/v86/?profile=freedos
Interesting! This is a new one.
I knew about JPC (http://jpc.sourceforge.net/) and PCjs
I don't think any motherboard has any DOS, Windows or other OS, though IBM
computers back in the 1980s came with ROM BASIC.
I have motherboard from MSI; now I am scared away from Asus, though perhaps the
newer, UEFI-equipped motherboards would be OK.
But there is also ASRock. I have no actual
I see a subject line of No subject; I must have forgotten to copy the
intended subject line.
Going back to 2001, I used Enhanced Editor (EPM) in OS/2 Warp 4, but was forced
off this editor cold-turkey when the system crashed sometime during the
single-digit days of April 2001.
CHKDSK,
It would seem that is the logical solution.
I thank you all for the advice. I have compared a few editors and have
decided to start with Setedit.
I am updating a bible translation (The Concordant Literal Translation)
which I originally compiled for my BibleWorks program using UltraEdit in
FDNPKG keeps all editors inside its util repository. Currently I see
there are 6 editors there, which seem a bit too little to create a
separate category.
Mateusz, I am a fan of your FNDPKG system and I use it in Real FreeDOS
Mode. I have customized the all_cd to work perfectly on my various
On 13/03/2015 17:59, Don Flowers wrote:
Is there a reason the edit category is not
included in the fdnpkg install program or the all_cd iso?
Actually FreeDOS categories do not translate directly into FDNPKG
repositories.
FDNPKG keeps all editors inside its util repository. Currently I see
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 6:20 AM, Mateusz Viste mate...@viste.fr wrote:
FDNPKG keeps all editors inside its util repository.
elvis 2.2 - a clone of vi/ex, the standard UNIX editor. Supports nearly
all vi/ex commands
Not to nitpick, it's still a good editor (at least in features), but
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Don Flowers donr...@gmail.com wrote:
FDNPKG keeps all editors inside its util repository. Currently I see
there are 6 editors there, which seem a bit too little to create a
separate category.
Mateusz, I am a fan of your FNDPKG system and I use it in Real
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Don Flowers donr...@gmail.com wrote:
I had actually forgotten about setedit (and have probably forgotten how to
use it as well). Is there a reason the edit category is not included in
the fdnpkg install program or the all_cd iso? I don't mind relearning
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Eric Auer e.a...@jpberlin.de wrote:
This is my number one request for FreeDOS 1.2/2/0.
Can we PLEASE increase the FreeDOS edit capacity to at least match the
capacity MS-DOS edit? I get so aggravated trying to open included .txt files
with various DOS
This is my number one request for FreeDOS 1.2/2/0.
Can we PLEASE increase the FreeDOS edit capacity to at least match the
capacity MS-DOS edit? I get so aggravated trying to open included .txt files
with various DOS programs only to find that the file exceeds the capacity of
FreeDOS edit.
--
Hi Dosgeek!
This is my number one request for FreeDOS 1.2/2/0.
Can we PLEASE increase the FreeDOS edit capacity to at least match the
capacity MS-DOS edit? I get so aggravated trying to open included .txt files
with various DOS programs only to find that the file exceeds the capacity of
Hi,
On Feb 14, 2015 3:44 PM, John Sowden jsow...@americansentry.net wrote:
This came up when I tried to exit DOS using the
dosemu exit program and it crashed.
What crashed? DOSEMU? Your app? Linux? What distro?
BTW, I thought exitemu was the correct way to exit DOSEMU.
The problem is not necessarily due to your hardware, but rather to the
ODI/IPX emulation thing you are trying to set up. What you need is
simply to load a classic packet driver designed for your card, without
any of the ODI stuff you have so far.
Well, in this case it seems that the onboard Intel
I use dosemu; been using it for 15 years. Although I still use DOS
(freedos+4dos) on a network in my office (wordstar, foxpro).
I needed a method of determining which OS I am running also. I set a
variable in the dosemu autoexec, then I test it, using a
routine in dosemu that allows you to
Hi again,
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Ralf Quint freedos...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/10/2015 5:34 PM, Rugxulo wrote:
But again, DOSEMU isn't widely deployed, so lots of people don't use
it. It still works fairly well, just not popular. I'm not sure if that
will ever improve. I don't want
Rugxulo wrote:
Hi again,
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Ralf Quint freedos...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/10/2015 5:34 PM, Rugxulo wrote:
But again, DOSEMU isn't widely deployed, so lots of people don't use
it. It still works fairly well, just not popular. I'm not sure if that
will ever
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Frantisek Hanzlik fra...@hanzlici.cz wrote:
Regarding to DOSEMU/SELinux interaction, it isn't too big problem
tune it e.g. in SELinux permissive mode.
su -c 'sysctl -w vm.mmap_min_addr=0'
su -c 'sesetbool -P mmap_low_allowed 1'
(That's all I know from a
That's not a problem related to FDNPKG indeed. Watt32 requires an
ethernet-level driver (that's what the class of the packet driver is
all about), while your ODI shim seems to be registering itself as
something else.
The problem is not necessarily due to your hardware, but rather to the
After about 16 hours, I have concluded that this is not an FDNPKG bug, for
at various times random pings also create the same error. Today I have read
of other issues with this onboard NIC, while a real PCI of the same chipset
is supposed be virtually PnP. I ordered a card on ebay for $9 with free
1101 - 1200 of 2540 matches
Mail list logo
