Declaring a result on this one. 13 +1s.
Jakarta's off to the Attic.
Hen
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> A joint vote to retire Jakarta into the Attic and to ask the board to
> close down the PMC.
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1,
Looks good, though I'm not sure the redirect on the mirror adds you
much value. I'd do it if it's standard practice, otherwise skip.
Hen
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 4:08 PM, sebb wrote:
> At present, BSF, BCEL and JCS downloads still use /dist/jakarta/.
>
> I've just started the process of moving JM
tic? Maybe just disband the
> PMC?
>
> Phil
>
>
>
> On Nov 10, 2011, at 10:01 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> A joint vote to retire Jakarta into the Attic and to ask the board to
>> close down the PMC.
>>
A joint vote to retire Jakarta into the Attic and to ask the board to
close down the PMC.
[ ] +1
[ ] -1, because
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: gener
The last project just moved out of Jakarta, so what you're seeing is a very
realistic view of things :)
We'll be closing down Jakarta soon. Waiting on JMeter to be fully 'out',
and then need to go through the non-profit motions to close the committee
down.
Hen
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Gei
JMeter->jmeter.apache.org was approved by the board. I'm eager to see
the change happen so the 'Close Jakarta' thread can start :)
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> Please provide any input for our October board report by editing the
> wiki, I'll be sending the report Sunday
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 2:31 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 22 September 2011 01:15, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Henri Yandell
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Rahul Akolkar
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Sep 2
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 3:15 AM, Henri Yandell
> wrote:
>> Happy to be on the PMC :) I'm not sure I'll be that active, but
>> hopefully can help with any setup items.
>>
>> +1 for Sebb as Chair.
Happy to be on the PMC :) I'm not sure I'll be that active, but
hopefully can help with any setup items.
+1 for Sebb as Chair.
Hen
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> I've created a draft TLP resolution for JMeter here, intent being to
> submit in time for the October board
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Rony G. Flatscher
wrote:
> ... cut ...
>> Well, I would like to incorporate the changes in August such that an
>> updated (bug-fixed, and the enhancements incorportated) BSF 2.x can then
>> be put into the attic.
>
> ... cut ...
>
> Another project (a language bind
Post the successful vote to move BSF over to Commons, I've moved the
svn into the Commons tree.
New svn url:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bsf/trunk
Or you can check out all of Commons at:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/trunks-proper
I've updated the Jakarta sit
(all both sub-votes)
=
Matt Benson
Henri Yandell
Stefan Bodewig
Luc Maisonobe
Christian Grobmeier
Simone Tripodi
Gary Gregory
Oliver Heger
James Carman
Daniel F. Savarese
Sebastian Bazley
There were no other votes, so the vote duly passes.
Thanks to all who voted.
On 17 August 2011 00
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Rony G. Flatscher
wrote:
>
>
> On 06.08.2011 18:41, sebb wrote:
>> On 6 August 2011 08:40, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Rony G. Flatscher
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 24.07.2011
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Rony G. Flatscher
wrote:
>
> On 24.07.2011 19:08, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Rony G. Flatscher
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 23.07.2011 20:47, sebb wrote:
>>>
>>>>> * BSF: Slow acti
12 days seems like enough time. No one has spoken for Cactus, so the
vote passes in favour of moving Cactus to the Attic.
I suspect there's no one around to do the move, so I'll go ahead and
inform the Attic PMC etc.
Hen
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> P
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Rony G. Flatscher
wrote:
>
> On 23.07.2011 20:47, sebb wrote:
>>> * BSF: Slow activity; only coder in last two years is Sebb.
>>>
>>> A difficult one to decide on. I think we should challenge on it going
>>> to the Attic, and if not send it to Commons where it will
Proposing this as a challenge vote (i.e. if no one has a good -1
against something moving to the attic, it's a sign it should go to the
attic).
[ ] +1, G'night BSF
[ ] -1, No because:
Per Sebb's statement:
"Now that JSR-223 is part of Java 1.6 there is less need for BSF.
There are no bugs
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
> ...
>
>>
>> > * JMeter: Lots of activity. New committer in 2010.
>> >
>> > This should go TLP. There are two obvious members of a JMeter PMC
>> > present (sebb and milamber). Reality is that Jakarta=JMeter now, so
>> > hopefully there ar
Proposing this as a challenge vote (i.e. if no one has a good -1
against something moving to the attic, it's a sign it should go to the
attic).
[ ] +1, G'night Cactus
[ ] -1, No because:
There's no activity in the project and I think it would be best to
recognize the reality and call it a day.
H
Thought I'd summarize the current activity of the subprojects:
* Cactus: No code commits since February 2009. Weak activity between
2006 and 2009.
I think Cactus should head to the Attic.
* BSF: Slow activity; only coder in last two years is Sebb.
A difficult one to decide on. I think we shoul
Rahul's pointing you to the Lucene mailing lists. This is the Jakarta
mailing list and only covers the few projects still left within the
Jakarta group; questions related to Snowball will have the best chance
of an answer on its own lists.
To provide context - back in 2002 or so we started to move
+1. Nom nom.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> This is a vote to move Jakarta Regexp to the Apache Attic, based on
> the outcome of the most recent discussion on the topic.
>
> Since Regexp may not have enough PMC members active, this vote will be
> held by lazy consensus. I
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> On Aug 18, 2010, at 12:23 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> With RegEx in Java since 1.4, I do not see the need for these libs aside
>> from legacy application support. I consider mothballing a service to the
>> community at large: please, joi
+1 on ECS to the Attic.
+1 on ORO/Regexp to the Attic, unless Daniel/Vadim are interested in
moving them to Commons.
To Daniel's not being +1 on Attic - don't worry about the
infrastructure move part, it's a well defined process now and someone
will take care of it.
Hen
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at
+1 on both being moved into the Attic.
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> This is cross-posted to reach most of the potentially interested
> folks, please reply to the gene...@jakarta.a.o mailing list.
>
> Quick recap, Jakarta retired Slide in Nov '07 and most of Taglibs in
>
Non-binding +1.
Whether or not the projects find they like being on one list or not,
it will be good. If it's not liked, then it's another reason to go
TLP.
--- as an aside, I thought I'd look at svn activity ---
Number of commits so far this year:
jmeter 481
bsf 143
cactus 97
jcs 63
bcel 15
W
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Daniel F. Savarese
> wrote:
>>
>
>>
>> Although I think we need to discuss and resolve what the future of
>> Jakarta is to be, I agree with Rahul that it should be a separ
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Daniel F. Savarese wrote:
>
>
> Although I think we need to discuss and resolve what the future of
> Jakarta is to be, I agree with Rahul that it should be a separate
> discussion after resolving his more narrowly scoped dev@/commits@
> proposal. The only reason
ase see:
http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/
Thank you,
Henri Yandell
on behalf of the Jakarta PMC
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@jakarta.apache.org
Looks good.
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> Here is the draft Board report for this month:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/JakartaBoardReport-current
>
> Please make any desired changes to the above wiki page directly. The
> report needs to go out in about 20 hours.
>
>
Wrong mailing list Dale.
Frustrating I know - but the people who focus on Commons Net probably
aren't paying attention on this list - if they're even subscribed.
See the commons-user list: http://commons.apache.org/net/mail-lists.html
Hen
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Dale Harris
wrote:
> H
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 8:50 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 23/01/2009, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> MD5 good.
>>
>> Bit bemused by the following line for JUnit. Wondering why it's
>> relevant, but not a blocker:
>>
>> "and is not maintained by Object Men
MD5 good.
Bit bemused by the following line for JUnit. Wondering why it's
relevant, but not a blocker:
"and is not maintained by Object Mentor."
Build of the samples/ in the bin zip with .m2/repository removed: Succeeds.
Build of all the source with .m2/repository removed: I accidentally
did
n.
>
> Can you retest the trunk and let me know the result.
>
> Thanks, Petar.
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Henri Yandell
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 3:41 AM, sebb wrote:
>> > On 21/01/2009, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> >> Yep - t
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 3:41 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 21/01/2009, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> Yep - turning off my local JIRA got me passed that problem and now I
>> get the same set of errors as Seb.
>>
>
> Does this always happen for you?
>
> If so, what is the path i
Yep - turning off my local JIRA got me passed that problem and now I
get the same set of errors as Seb.
Hen
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Petar Tahchiev
wrote:
> Actually Hentry's problem
> was that he had something alreadty running on port 8080.
>
> But you are right. We check if the propert
everything
> goes smooth.
>
> Can you tell me what is the error in the test-logs?
>
> Or maybe try to run it again?
>
> Or even try the rc2, which is here:
> http://people.apache.org/~ptahchiev/1.8.1-rc2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eptahchiev/1.8.1-rc2/>
>
> Tha
I ran 'mvn clean install' in the source unpacked directory:
---
T E S T S
---
Running org.apache.cactus.extension.jetty.TestJettyTestSetup
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger
(org
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 1:37 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 18/01/2009, Petar Tahchiev wrote:
>> Hello guys,
>>
>> It's been more than 10 months since I released Cactus version 1.8.0,
>> and not I am trying to push the 1.8.1 release. I have closed some
>> issues in the JIRA, added a maven2 plugin for Ca
MD5, PGP good.
It's a bit odd that the binary version comes chock full of jars and
the source version doesn't. When I run 'ant' in the source version I
get:
BUILD FAILED
/Users/hen/apache/jmeter/jakarta-jmeter-2.3.2/build.xml:925:
/Users/hen/apache/jmeter/jakarta-jmeter-2.3.2/lib/opt not found.
On Jan 31, 2008 7:34 AM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2008 3:26 PM, Magnus Grimsell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Well, the version of Cargo integrated is: 0.9
> >
> > Ok, I've done some fixes for Cactus to work with Cargo 1.0-SNAPSHOT.
> > Once cargo releases 1.0 I'll
+1, with various minor notes.
Signatures are good. MD5s are good.
The src tgz contains:
> jakarta-jmeter-2.3.1RC1/bin/jmeter
> jakarta-jmeter-2.3.1RC1/bin/jmeter-server
> jakarta-jmeter-2.3.1RC1/bin/jmeter.sh
but the src zip does not.
Otherwise the archives seem the same.
The build fails for
On Nov 19, 2007 12:44 AM, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2007 10:20 AM, Thomas Vandahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> > > Why? W/o Jakarta, the diagrams don't make any sense. For example, the
> > > Jakarta-free one has velocity's only relation
On 10/6/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> JMeter has just been offered a Maven plugin for creating reports.
>
> Rather than include the code in JMeter, I think it would be better
> hosted at mojo.codehaus.org, along with the other Maven plugins.
Agreed.
> That got me thinking - perhaps a simi
I don't think so - the 3rd party draft I link to says pretty much the
same thing.
On 10/4/07, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
> > The following page has been changed by HenriYandell:
> > http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/Using_LGPL'd_code
> >
> >
> Does this mean the door to have LG
Personally I'd ask the reverse question of the Fisheye users. Can
OpenGrok serve the same purpose?
If so, then we should stop using the commercial app and move to the open app.
On 9/3/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would FishEye serve the same purpose?
>
> * http://fisheye6.cenqua.c
On 8/18/07, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-08-18 at 13:40 +0200, Roland Weber wrote:
> > >> Disassociation from the server side.
> > >
> > > What is the benefit of that? At any rate in my opinion it is not worth
> > > trouble of rebranding the whole project.
> >
> > Wil
Thanks for the request Rida.
You'll notice that none of the projects you list are in Jakarta -
which is true of most of the vendors listed on that page. We've
decoupled the vendors page from the rest of the site, and will be
removing the page as it's no longer relevant.
Sorry that that had not al
I've migrated (somewhat) the Get Involved from the Jakarta site to the
Apache site:
* http://jakarta.apache.org/site/getinvolved.html
* http://www.apache.org/foundation/getinvolved.html
Any thoughts on removing the Jakarta one and replacing it with a link
to the central one?
Hen
---
Sorry, yeah. Just doing things at the macro level and then trying to
figure out what got screwed up lower down.
So what should we do?
On 7/31/07, Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is a result of the full redirection of the commons from Jakarta to
> commons.apache.org and pr
On 6/24/07, Roland Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1. Keep the httpclient site with the rest of commons
and move it to the new TLP domain. We'll have to update
the httpclient build with the new location and redeploy.
(Anything I've forgotten?)
2. Move the httpclient site to httpcomponents. Sin
Don't go the subtask route. Keep it all on the one issue as TLP Admin
and Joe'll take care of things.
Hen
On 6/22/07, Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is a Velocity JIRA Issue with a lot of subtasks that basically has
everything that is needed/can be done for a new TLP. S
On 6/14/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/9/07, Scott Eade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Henri Yandell wrote:
> > Sorry - I was doing the POI one on www.apache and jakarta.apache and
> > cleaned up the remaining velocity/turbine bits on jakarta.
On 6/9/07, Scott Eade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
> Sorry - I was doing the POI one on www.apache and jakarta.apache and
> cleaned up the remaining velocity/turbine bits on jakarta.apache while
> doing that.
>
> The download page points to closer.cgi, so
On 6/11/07, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi everyone,
The board meeting is the 20th, so it would be nice if we can add the commons
TLP proposal for that
meeting.
So we probably need to finalize the proposal and send it off during the weekend.
I think the majority opinion was
Sorry - I was doing the POI one on www.apache and jakarta.apache and
cleaned up the remaining velocity/turbine bits on jakarta.apache while
doing that.
The download page points to closer.cgi, so I figured things were good.
Do you need me to roll back?
Hen
On 6/8/07, Scott Eade <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On 5/30/07, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/30/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/30/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 5/26/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Ack in terms of driving a c
Surprisingly hard to find.
Watchdog has technically moved to tomcat.apache.org, but as it was
dormant before then there's not been a lot done but move the svn over
there. ie) Jakarta still has the 'it's dormant' bit, but as it moved
the download page was removed.
Looking in http://archive.apache
On 5/30/07, Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 19:00 +0100, sebb wrote:
> The NOTICE file is not supposed to contain any licenses.
What makes you think so? I am still a bit stumped that you so strongly
insist on this. Is there any reference (besides the cited
On 5/30/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/26/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ack in terms of driving a community away because it is unable to meet
> our arbitrary criteria.
That sort of thinking just seems so Borg to me. It's another way of
On 5/27/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 27/05/07, Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The license under which the code gets licensed to our end users is in
> LICENSE.txt.
>
> Copyright notices and optional third-party licenses under which the code
> got licensed to us is in
On 5/26/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/25/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 4) Goto code.google. Ack :(
I wouldn't discount GoogleCode (or Java.net or SourceForge or
CodeHaus). Right now, there's a GoogleCode site that I use everyday,
and i
On 5/25/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/23/07, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In fact, I object to the fact the it seems to be so difficult to escape
Jakarta.
:) So far, it's been *much* less difficult than creating the Jakarta
Commons in the first place! Back in
On 5/23/07, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Original Message
From: Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Using CLI as an example, I'm not sure that there is a shared sense of
> responsibility for it.
>
> CLI 1.x has had an issue open against it since 2006-03 with only
> rece
On 5/22/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quick summary of this thread 28 Votes for (23 binding), 4 against (3
binding). Seems to me that those objecting don't seem to have
pursuaded people to change their vote. At what point do we decide on a
result?
I think you just did :) Defin
On 5/21/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/21/07, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Then take it to the next stage. Update the Jakarta home page to
> > include links to our other Java products that were never part of
> > Jakarta, like iBATIS, and invite all ASF Java p
On 5/21/07, Nick Burch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All
For the 3.0 release of POI, we followed the advice on voting on
artificats, the not the state of the tree. So, we used our ant script to
produce RC artificats, signed them, and placed them on people.apache.org
for review.
After the vote,
On 5/15/07, Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Ok, I've followed the commons TLP vote thread with some interest
because it seems to impact directly on the end-game for Jakarta.
I believe that we have to make some pretty fundamental decisions about
that future before we can fully resolve
On 5/15/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We can create a "Jakarta Commons PMC" without affecting the future of
the "Jakata PMC". We should stop thinking of "Jakarta" only as an
entity, and go back to thinking of it as to the ASF synonym for
"Java", as originally intended.
Very interes
On 5/13/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/13/07, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't see why. As a member of the Jakarta PMC I'm willing to allow
> > jakarta-commons.apache.org to use our trademark :-)
>
> The problem is that you will be hijacking the Jakarta n
On 5/10/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/8/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ ] +1 I support the proposal
> [ ] +0 I don't care
> [x] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because...
I do not feel the draft resolution adequately addres
On 5/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, here's a vote for Commons to officially request that it move
> to TLP.
+1 (non binding)
>
>http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TLPResolution
>
> Please add your name if you're a Commons developer and haven't added
> you
tlp resolution
which may be considered bad.
Hope that helps,
Hen
On 5/8/07, Petar Tahchiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/9/07, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Henri Yandell wrote on Tuesday, May 08, 2007 7:20 PM:
>
> > Sadly a bit too late
On 5/9/07, Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [X] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because...
diffing the Wiki text against the template in SVN
(https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/templates/subproject-tlp-resolution.txt)
shows significant differences. I'd like
Sadly a bit too late to make the next board meeting I suspect.
However, here's a vote for Commons to officially request that it move to TLP.
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TLPResolution
Please add your name if you're a Commons developer and haven't added
your name yet.
[ ] +1 I supp
+1.
On 5/4/07, Nick Burch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All
After lots of discussion within POI, and Jakarta in general, we think POI
is ready to graduate to its own TLP. Thanks to the magic of ApacheCon,
lots of people have been on-hand to help finalise the proposal for this,
which is attached
A belated +1.
On 4/28/07, Scott Eade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Turbine project has been discussing a proposal to the board that the
Turbine projects leave the Jakarta umbrella and become their own top
level project. We are now at the point in the process that calls for a
vote to take place
On 4/9/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm definitely interested. BeanUtils tries to do too
> many things in one
> lib, and besides it is really ugly internally. So
> something like Morph
> would be very useful to have.
To be honest, M
So people know, I started up a discussion on moving Commons to TLP a
couple of days ago. It's looking very positive, so I'll probably go
ahead and kick off a vote in a day or so.
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
F
Sorry for the lack of reply.
I'm completely interested in mentoring (Roller just went TLP, and
OpenEJB should be going that way very soon, so I'm free on the
Incubator stuff right now).
I'll reply more later. Anyone else interested?
Hen
On 4/3/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just w
On 3/20/07, Vadim Gritsenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
> This 'how we release' conversation has been bouncing around the ASF
> for 4 months now, the above is my best grok on the summary. I've not
> seen anyone yet speaking in favour of a view t
On 3/18/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/14/07, Vadim Gritsenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
> > You actually have to roll and sign a tarball/zip ball on which the vote
> > happens. "Release-then-Vote" see
On 3/14/07, Vadim Gritsenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
> You actually have to roll and sign a tarball/zip ball on which the vote
> happens. "Release-then-Vote" seems to be the only accepted way by the
> board these days;
Thankfully, neither events in velocity-pri
Heh. Whereas I go through the spam every now and then and delete the
spam and reply with -allow to the good ones (except for announce@
where I always do -accept) and while I reply to -owner I can't do much
for people as a moderator any more because gmail.com doesn't seem to
work with the list mode
Howard knocked it together.
XML file that generates HTML and RSS.
The news.xml in the jakarta/site/ in svn.
Hen
On 2/7/07, Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I see jakarta has a news feed, I'd like to nick the idea for James.
How did you do that?
d.
-
On 2/14/07, Roland Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here is my take on a revival procedure...
Pre-precondition.
We need to define what is inactive and place it in such a state.
Dormant seems a favourite word.
In the recent board report for the Commons components, we've gone with
"Inactive" t
On 1/17/07, Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So how about biting the bullet and installing one of the well
established and obviously easier tools:
* Cruise Control (http://cruisecontrol.sourceforge.net/)
Just downloaded this the other day to sit and play with. When last I
loo
chrieb:
> Gump doesn't build against the versions of the dependencies specified in the
pom / project.xml, but
> builds against the latest of everything, which could mean other trouble if
you are using those jars.
>
> Mvgr,
> Martin
>
> Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
>> Umm
On 1/16/07, Ortwin Glück <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone (Henry?) know what happened to
http://www.apache.org/dev/nightly-builds.html ?
It's referenced from
http://www.apache.org/dev/
at the very bottom of the page. I'm looking for information how to get
nightly builds done for H
Martin - maybe if you forward this to root@ and ask if there's
anything you can do to help etc, it'd be a good nudge?
Hen
On 1/10/07, Andrew C. Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IIRC, this is my 4th attempt to resolve this (I try like every 3-4
months). I would like to commit something. My SV
On 12/20/06, David Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Jakarta Board-
A suggestion after reading with interest the recent POI vs. Jakarta
smoke and flames threads.
I think that Jakarta needs a voting application that can include PMC
quorum requirements, direct email vote requests, committer ap
On 12/18/06, Andrew C. Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sleep Martinsleep. All will be answered, resolved...but not today.
Right now I'm going to help my 2 year old draw dinosaurs with his
Hanukkah present (he is obsessed with dinosaurs).
My 2 year old is obsessed with trains. We let the
On 12/17/06, Roland Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Avik,
> I'd have been happy seeing POI move to a TLP. However, some of the
> comments in this thread seem to preclude that possibility either. I
> think his leaves the community between a rock and a hard place ... I
> dont want us to be
On 12/17/06, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Avik Sengupta wrote:
> I'd have been happy seeing POI move to a TLP. However, some of the
> comments in this thread seem to preclude that possibility either. I
> think his leaves the community between a rock and a hard place ... I
>
On 12/15/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/15/06, Nick Burch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Martin van den Bemt wrote:
> > Apache legal doesn't know anything about this..
>
> Back when I joined POI, I was told the apa
On 12/15/06, Andrew C. Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey I have an idea! If it doesn't pass this time we can call another
vote right before the next holiday and hope that none of the POI PMC
members are around... Then 3 months later do it again.
Reasoning being that Martin has done the sa
On 12/15/06, Andrew C. Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-1.
You are of course misrepresenting the issue but okay. It is also
because of the legal issues. Go read the archive and provide a good
faith assertion rather than making an assumption. If YOU want to work
on POI please submit some pat
On 12/15/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/15/06, Nick Burch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Martin van den Bemt wrote:
> > Apache legal doesn't know anything about this..
>
> Back when I joined POI, I was told the apa
On 12/15/06, Henning Schmiedehausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hm,
does it pose a real legal threat or is it just a "felt threat" from
Andy?
As long as we're not soliciting trade secrets - tis good. I suspect
this is a case of Andy's lawyer back in the day either having a
different opinion or
On 12/15/06, Nick Burch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Martin van den Bemt wrote:
> Apache legal doesn't know anything about this..
Back when I joined POI, I was told the apache legal team had suggested the
requirement.
Perhaps one of the older POI committers can supply the ori
1 - 100 of 782 matches
Mail list logo
