[RESULT] Move Jakarta to the Attic; close down Jakarta PMC

2011-12-04 Thread Henri Yandell
Declaring a result on this one. 13 +1s. Jakarta's off to the Attic. Hen On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Henri Yandell bay...@apache.org wrote: A joint vote to retire Jakarta into the Attic and to ask the board to close down the PMC.  [ ] +1  [ ] -1, because Hen

Re: Moving release archives for BSF, BCEL, JCS from Jakarta to Commons

2011-11-11 Thread Henri Yandell
Looks good, though I'm not sure the redirect on the mirror adds you much value. I'd do it if it's standard practice, otherwise skip. Hen On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 4:08 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: At present, BSF, BCEL and JCS downloads still use /dist/jakarta/proj. I've just started the

[VOTE] Move Jakarta to the Attic; close down Jakarta PMC

2011-11-10 Thread Henri Yandell
A joint vote to retire Jakarta into the Attic and to ask the board to close down the PMC. [ ] +1 [ ] -1, because Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Move Jakarta to the Attic; close down Jakarta PMC

2011-11-10 Thread Henri Yandell
to put in the attic?  Maybe just disband the PMC? Phil On Nov 10, 2011, at 10:01 AM, Henri Yandell bay...@apache.org wrote: A joint vote to retire Jakarta into the Attic and to ask the board to close down the PMC.  [ ] +1  [ ] -1, because Hen

Re: Top Level Jakarta Website

2011-11-08 Thread Henri Yandell
The last project just moved out of Jakarta, so what you're seeing is a very realistic view of things :) We'll be closing down Jakarta soon. Waiting on JMeter to be fully 'out', and then need to go through the non-profit motions to close the committee down. Hen On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:48 AM,

Re: October board report input needed

2011-10-28 Thread Henri Yandell
JMeter-jmeter.apache.org was approved by the board. I'm eager to see the change happen so the 'Close Jakarta' thread can start :) On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote: Please provide any input for our October board report by editing the wiki, I'll be

Re: JMeter TLP - draft resolution and first chair

2011-09-21 Thread Henri Yandell
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 3:15 AM, Henri Yandell bay...@generationjava.com wrote: Happy to be on the PMC :) I'm not sure I'll be that active, but hopefully can help with any setup items. +1 for Sebb as Chair. snip

Re: JMeter TLP - draft resolution and first chair

2011-09-21 Thread Henri Yandell
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 2:31 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 22 September 2011 01:15, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Henri Yandell bay...@generationjava.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote

Re: JMeter TLP - draft resolution and first chair

2011-09-20 Thread Henri Yandell
Happy to be on the PMC :) I'm not sure I'll be that active, but hopefully can help with any setup items. +1 for Sebb as Chair. Hen On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote: I've created a draft TLP resolution for JMeter here, intent being to submit in time

Re: Ad BSF 2.x (Re: Activity of Jakarta subprojects

2011-09-11 Thread Henri Yandell
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Rony G. Flatscher rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at wrote: ... cut ... Well, I would like to incorporate the changes in August such that an updated (bug-fixed, and the enhancements incorportated) BSF 2.x can then be put into the attic. ... cut ... Another

Re: Ad BSF 2.x (Re: Activity of Jakarta subprojects

2011-08-06 Thread Henri Yandell
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Rony G. Flatscher rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at wrote: On 24.07.2011 19:08, Henri Yandell wrote: On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Rony G. Flatscher rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at wrote: On 23.07.2011 20:47, sebb wrote: * BSF: Slow activity; only coder in last

Re: Ad BSF 2.x (Re: Activity of Jakarta subprojects

2011-08-06 Thread Henri Yandell
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Rony G. Flatscher rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at wrote: On 06.08.2011 18:41, sebb wrote: On 6 August 2011 08:40, Henri Yandell bay...@generationjava.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Rony G. Flatscher rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at wrote

[RESULT] Cactus to the Attic

2011-08-05 Thread Henri Yandell
12 days seems like enough time. No one has spoken for Cactus, so the vote passes in favour of moving Cactus to the Attic. I suspect there's no one around to do the move, so I'll go ahead and inform the Attic PMC etc. Hen On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Henri Yandell bay...@apache.org wrote

[VOTE] Move BSF to the Attic

2011-07-24 Thread Henri Yandell
Proposing this as a challenge vote (i.e. if no one has a good -1 against something moving to the attic, it's a sign it should go to the attic). [ ] +1, G'night BSF [ ] -1, No because: Per Sebb's statement: Now that JSR-223 is part of Java 1.6 there is less need for BSF. There are no bugs

Re: Ad BSF 2.x (Re: Activity of Jakarta subprojects

2011-07-24 Thread Henri Yandell
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Rony G. Flatscher rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at wrote: On 23.07.2011 20:47, sebb wrote: * BSF: Slow activity; only coder in last two years is Sebb. A difficult one to decide on. I think we should challenge on it going to the Attic, and if not send it to

Activity of Jakarta subprojects

2011-07-23 Thread Henri Yandell
Thought I'd summarize the current activity of the subprojects: * Cactus: No code commits since February 2009. Weak activity between 2006 and 2009. I think Cactus should head to the Attic. * BSF: Slow activity; only coder in last two years is Sebb. A difficult one to decide on. I think we

[VOTE] Cactus to the Attic

2011-07-23 Thread Henri Yandell
Proposing this as a challenge vote (i.e. if no one has a good -1 against something moving to the attic, it's a sign it should go to the attic). [ ] +1, G'night Cactus [ ] -1, No because: There's no activity in the project and I think it would be best to recognize the reality and call it a day.

Re: Activity of Jakarta subprojects

2011-07-23 Thread Henri Yandell
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski ol...@apache.org wrote: ... * JMeter: Lots of activity. New committer in 2010. This should go TLP. There are two obvious members of a JMeter PMC present (sebb and milamber). Reality is that Jakarta=JMeter now, so hopefully there are

Re: Unable to download Snowball !

2011-04-19 Thread Henri Yandell
Rahul's pointing you to the Lucene mailing lists. This is the Jakarta mailing list and only covers the few projects still left within the Jakarta group; questions related to Snowball will have the best chance of an answer on its own lists. To provide context - back in 2002 or so we started to

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Move Jakarta Regexp to Attic

2011-03-22 Thread Henri Yandell
+1. Nom nom. On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote: This is a vote to move Jakarta Regexp to the Apache Attic, based on the outcome of the most recent discussion on the topic. Since Regexp may not have enough PMC members active, this vote will be held

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Move ECS, ORO and Regexp to Attic

2010-09-04 Thread Henri Yandell
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Vadim Gritsenko va...@reverycodes.com wrote: On Aug 18, 2010, at 12:23 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: With RegEx in Java since 1.4, I do not see the need for these libs aside from legacy application support. I consider mothballing a service to the community at

Re: Move Jakarta Slide and Taglibs to the Attic?

2010-03-23 Thread Henri Yandell
+1 on both being moved into the Attic. On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote: This is cross-posted to reach most of the potentially interested folks, please reply to the gene...@jakarta.a.o mailing list. Quick recap, Jakarta retired Slide in Nov '07 and

Re: New home for ECS, ORO and Regexp?

2010-03-23 Thread Henri Yandell
+1 on ECS to the Attic. +1 on ORO/Regexp to the Attic, unless Daniel/Vadim are interested in moving them to Commons. To Daniel's not being +1 on Attic - don't worry about the infrastructure move part, it's a well defined process now and someone will take care of it. Hen On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at

Re: [VOTE] Merge dev lists

2009-10-22 Thread Henri Yandell
Non-binding +1. Whether or not the projects find they like being on one list or not, it will be good. If it's not liked, then it's another reason to go TLP. --- as an aside, I thought I'd look at svn activity --- Number of commits so far this year: jmeter 481 bsf 143 cactus 97 jcs 63 bcel 15

Re: [PROPOSAL] One development list

2009-10-14 Thread Henri Yandell
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Daniel F. Savarese d...@savarese.org wrote: Although I think we need to discuss and resolve what the future of Jakarta is to be, I agree with Rahul that it should be a separate discussion after resolving his more narrowly scoped dev@/commits@ proposal.  The

Re: [PROPOSAL] One development list

2009-10-14 Thread Henri Yandell
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Henri Yandell bay...@apache.org wrote: On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Daniel F. Savarese d...@savarese.org wrote: Although I think we need to discuss and resolve what the future of Jakarta is to be, I agree with Rahul that it should be a separate

[ANNOUNCE] Taglibs moves to Tomcat

2009-10-10 Thread Henri Yandell
://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/ Thank you, Henri Yandell on behalf of the Jakarta PMC - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@jakarta.apache.org

Re: [DRAFT] Board Report July 2009

2009-07-13 Thread Henri Yandell
Looks good. On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Rahul Akolkarrahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote: Here is the draft Board report for this month:  http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/JakartaBoardReport-current Please make any desired changes to the above wiki page directly. The report needs to go out in

Re: Apache commons.net 2.0 support

2009-05-26 Thread Henri Yandell
Wrong mailing list Dale. Frustrating I know - but the people who focus on Commons Net probably aren't paying attention on this list - if they're even subscribed. See the commons-user list: http://commons.apache.org/net/mail-lists.html Hen On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Dale Harris

Re: [VOTE] Release Cactus 1.8.1 (Third attempt)

2009-01-22 Thread Henri Yandell
MD5 good. Bit bemused by the following line for JUnit. Wondering why it's relevant, but not a blocker: and is not maintained by Object Mentor. Build of the samples/ in the bin zip with .m2/repository removed: Succeeds. Build of all the source with .m2/repository removed: I accidentally did

Re: [VOTE] Release Jakarta Cactus 1.8.1

2009-01-21 Thread Henri Yandell
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 3:41 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 21/01/2009, Henri Yandell bay...@generationjava.com wrote: Yep - turning off my local JIRA got me passed that problem and now I get the same set of errors as Seb. Does this always happen for you? If so, what is the path

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.8.1 of Cactus

2009-01-20 Thread Henri Yandell
and everything goes smooth. Can you tell me what is the error in the test-logs? Or maybe try to run it again? Or even try the rc2, which is here: http://people.apache.org/~ptahchiev/1.8.1-rc2/http://people.apache.org/%7Eptahchiev/1.8.1-rc2/ Thanks, Petar On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Henri

Re: [VOTE] Release Jakarta Cactus 1.8.1

2009-01-20 Thread Henri Yandell
Yep - turning off my local JIRA got me passed that problem and now I get the same set of errors as Seb. Hen On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Petar Tahchiev paranoiabla.li...@gmail.com wrote: Actually Hentry's problem was that he had something alreadty running on port 8080. But you are right.

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.8.1 of Cactus

2009-01-19 Thread Henri Yandell
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 1:37 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 18/01/2009, Petar Tahchiev paranoiabla.li...@gmail.com wrote: Hello guys, It's been more than 10 months since I released Cactus version 1.8.0, and not I am trying to push the 1.8.1 release. I have closed some issues in the

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.8.1 of Cactus

2009-01-19 Thread Henri Yandell
I ran 'mvn clean install' in the source unpacked directory: --- T E S T S --- Running org.apache.cactus.extension.jetty.TestJettyTestSetup log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger

Re: [VOTE] JMeter 2.3.2RC3

2008-05-28 Thread Henri Yandell
MD5, PGP good. It's a bit odd that the binary version comes chock full of jars and the source version doesn't. When I run 'ant' in the source version I get: BUILD FAILED /Users/hen/apache/jmeter/jakarta-jmeter-2.3.2/build.xml:925: /Users/hen/apache/jmeter/jakarta-jmeter-2.3.2/lib/opt not found.

Re: Cactus Development For a RC

2008-01-31 Thread Henri Yandell
On Jan 31, 2008 7:34 AM, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 31, 2008 3:26 PM, Magnus Grimsell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, the version of Cargo integrated is: 0.9 Ok, I've done some fixes for Cactus to work with Cargo 1.0-SNAPSHOT. Once cargo releases 1.0 I'll be able to

Re: [VOTE] JMeter 2.3.1RC1

2007-11-26 Thread Henri Yandell
+1, with various minor notes. Signatures are good. MD5s are good. The src tgz contains: jakarta-jmeter-2.3.1RC1/bin/jmeter jakarta-jmeter-2.3.1RC1/bin/jmeter-server jakarta-jmeter-2.3.1RC1/bin/jmeter.sh but the src zip does not. Otherwise the archives seem the same. The build fails for

Re: Jakarta at the center of the (ASF) universe

2007-11-19 Thread Henri Yandell
On Nov 19, 2007 12:44 AM, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 18, 2007 10:20 AM, Thomas Vandahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Why? W/o Jakarta, the diagrams don't make any sense. For example, the Jakarta-free one has velocity's only relationship to DB

Re: External plugin repository for JMeter?

2007-10-06 Thread Henri Yandell
On 10/6/07, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: JMeter has just been offered a Maven plugin for creating reports. Rather than include the code in JMeter, I think it would be better hosted at mojo.codehaus.org, along with the other Maven plugins. Agreed. That got me thinking - perhaps a similar

Re: [Jakarta Wiki] Update of Using LGPL'd code by HenriYandell

2007-10-04 Thread Henri Yandell
I don't think so - the 3rd party draft I link to says pretty much the same thing. On 10/4/07, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! The following page has been changed by HenriYandell: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta/Using_LGPL'd_code Does this mean the door to have LGPL

Re: Add company to Third-Party Support page

2007-08-24 Thread Henri Yandell
Thanks for the request Rida. You'll notice that none of the projects you list are in Jakarta - which is true of most of the vendors listed on that page. We've decoupled the vendors page from the rest of the site, and will be removing the page as it's no longer relevant. Sorry that that had not

Re: [discuss] Slide + HttpComponents = TLP

2007-08-24 Thread Henri Yandell
On 8/18/07, Oleg Kalnichevski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 2007-08-18 at 13:40 +0200, Roland Weber wrote: Disassociation from the server side. What is the benefit of that? At any rate in my opinion it is not worth trouble of rebranding the whole project. Will the current

Killing the getinvolved page?

2007-08-15 Thread Henri Yandell
I've migrated (somewhat) the Get Involved from the Jakarta site to the Apache site: * http://jakarta.apache.org/site/getinvolved.html * http://www.apache.org/foundation/getinvolved.html Any thoughts on removing the Jakarta one and replacing it with a link to the central one? Hen

Re: HttpClient 3.x Homepage

2007-08-08 Thread Henri Yandell
Sorry, yeah. Just doing things at the macro level and then trying to figure out what got screwed up lower down. So what should we do? On 7/31/07, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That is a result of the full redirection of the commons from Jakarta to commons.apache.org and

Re: What about HttpClient? (was: Commons is TLP)

2007-06-28 Thread Henri Yandell
On 6/24/07, Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. Keep the httpclient site with the rest of commons and move it to the new TLP domain. We'll have to update the httpclient build with the new location and redeploy. (Anything I've forgotten?) 2. Move the httpclient site to httpcomponents.

Re: Commons is TLP

2007-06-24 Thread Henri Yandell
Don't go the subtask route. Keep it all on the one issue as TLP Admin and Joe'll take care of things. Hen On 6/22/07, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a Velocity JIRA Issue with a lot of subtasks that basically has everything that is needed/can be done for a new TLP.

Re: Jakarta site directory no longer contains .svn directories

2007-06-15 Thread Henri Yandell
On 6/14/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/9/07, Scott Eade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Henri Yandell wrote: Sorry - I was doing the POI one on www.apache and jakarta.apache and cleaned up the remaining velocity/turbine bits on jakarta.apache while doing that. The download

Re: Commons TLP for Board Meeting ?

2007-06-14 Thread Henri Yandell
On 6/11/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone, The board meeting is the 20th, so it would be nice if we can add the commons TLP proposal for that meeting. So we probably need to finalize the proposal and send it off during the weekend. I think the majority opinion was

Re: Jakarta site directory no longer contains .svn directories

2007-06-14 Thread Henri Yandell
On 6/9/07, Scott Eade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Henri Yandell wrote: Sorry - I was doing the POI one on www.apache and jakarta.apache and cleaned up the remaining velocity/turbine bits on jakarta.apache while doing that. The download page points to closer.cgi, so I figured things were good

Re: Jakarta site directory no longer contains .svn directories

2007-06-09 Thread Henri Yandell
Sorry - I was doing the POI one on www.apache and jakarta.apache and cleaned up the remaining velocity/turbine bits on jakarta.apache while doing that. The download page points to closer.cgi, so I figured things were good. Do you need me to roll back? Hen On 6/8/07, Scott Eade [EMAIL

Re: [VOTE] Release JCS 1.3

2007-05-30 Thread Henri Yandell
On 5/30/07, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 19:00 +0100, sebb wrote: The NOTICE file is not supposed to contain any licenses. What makes you think so? I am still a bit stumped that you so strongly insist on this. Is there any reference (besides the cited

Re: jakarta-watchdog-4.0 source download

2007-05-30 Thread Henri Yandell
Surprisingly hard to find. Watchdog has technically moved to tomcat.apache.org, but as it was dormant before then there's not been a lot done but move the svn over there. ie) Jakarta still has the 'it's dormant' bit, but as it moved the download page was removed. Looking in

Re: [PROPOSAL] The future of Jakarta

2007-05-26 Thread Henri Yandell
On 5/26/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/25/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 4) Goto code.google. Ack :( I wouldn't discount GoogleCode (or Java.net or SourceForge or CodeHaus). Right now, there's a GoogleCode site that I use everyday, and it's been utterly reliable

Re: [PROPOSAL] The future of Jakarta

2007-05-25 Thread Henri Yandell
On 5/25/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/23/07, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In fact, I object to the fact the it seems to be so difficult to escape Jakarta. :) So far, it's been *much* less difficult than creating the Jakarta Commons in the first place! Back in the

Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP

2007-05-23 Thread Henri Yandell
On 5/23/07, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Original Message From: Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using CLI as an example, I'm not sure that there is a shared sense of responsibility for it. CLI 1.x has had an issue open against it since 2006-03 with only recent

Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP

2007-05-22 Thread Henri Yandell
On 5/22/07, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quick summary of this thread 28 Votes for (23 binding), 4 against (3 binding). Seems to me that those objecting don't seem to have pursuaded people to change their vote. At what point do we decide on a result? I think you just did :)

Re: Voting on releasing RC artificats as Final

2007-05-21 Thread Henri Yandell
On 5/21/07, Nick Burch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All For the 3.0 release of POI, we followed the advice on voting on artificats, the not the state of the tree. So, we used our ant script to produce RC artificats, signed them, and placed them on people.apache.org for review. After the vote,

Re: [PROPOSAL] The future of Jakarta

2007-05-21 Thread Henri Yandell
On 5/21/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/21/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Then take it to the next stage. Update the Jakarta home page to include links to our other Java products that were never part of Jakarta, like iBATIS, and invite all ASF Java products

Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP

2007-05-15 Thread Henri Yandell
On 5/15/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We can create a Jakarta Commons PMC without affecting the future of the Jakata PMC. We should stop thinking of Jakarta only as an entity, and go back to thinking of it as to the ASF synonym for Java, as originally intended. Very interesting

Re: [PROPOSAL] The future of Jakarta

2007-05-15 Thread Henri Yandell
On 5/15/07, Danny Angus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Ok, I've followed the commons TLP vote thread with some interest because it seems to impact directly on the end-game for Jakarta. I believe that we have to make some pretty fundamental decisions about that future before we can fully resolve

Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP

2007-05-13 Thread Henri Yandell
On 5/13/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/13/07, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't see why. As a member of the Jakarta PMC I'm willing to allow jakarta-commons.apache.org to use our trademark :-) The problem is that you will be hijacking the Jakarta name and

Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP

2007-05-10 Thread Henri Yandell
On 5/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, here's a vote for Commons to officially request that it move to TLP. +1 (non binding) http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TLPResolution Please add your name if you're a Commons developer and haven't added your name

Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP

2007-05-10 Thread Henri Yandell
On 5/10/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/8/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ ] +1 I support the proposal [ ] +0 I don't care [x] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because... I do not feel the draft resolution adequately addresses several remarks made in the discussion

Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP

2007-05-09 Thread Henri Yandell
On 5/9/07, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [X] -1 I'm opposed to the proposal because... diffing the Wiki text against the template in SVN (https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/board/templates/subproject-tlp-resolution.txt) shows significant differences. I'd like

Re: [VOTE] Commons moving to TLP

2007-05-09 Thread Henri Yandell
. Hope that helps, Hen On 5/8/07, Petar Tahchiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/9/07, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 Henri Yandell wrote on Tuesday, May 08, 2007 7:20 PM: Sadly a bit too late to make the next board meeting I suspect. However, here's a vote for Commons

Re: [VOTE] Move POI to TLP

2007-05-04 Thread Henri Yandell
+1. On 5/4/07, Nick Burch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All After lots of discussion within POI, and Jakarta in general, we think POI is ready to graduate to its own TLP. Thanks to the magic of ApacheCon, lots of people have been on-hand to help finalise the proposal for this, which is attached

Re: [VOTE] Move Turbine to TLP

2007-05-01 Thread Henri Yandell
A belated +1. On 4/28/07, Scott Eade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Turbine project has been discussing a proposal to the board that the Turbine projects leave the Jakarta umbrella and become their own top level project. We are now at the point in the process that calls for a vote to take place.

Re: [proposal] Morph as Jakarta-sponsored podling WAS Morph proposal

2007-04-19 Thread Henri Yandell
On 4/9/07, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm definitely interested. BeanUtils tries to do too many things in one lib, and besides it is really ugly internally. So something like Morph would be very useful to have. To be honest, Morph

Re: [proposal] Morph as Jakarta-sponsored podling WAS Morph proposal

2007-04-04 Thread Henri Yandell
Sorry for the lack of reply. I'm completely interested in mentoring (Roller just went TLP, and OpenEJB should be going that way very soon, so I'm free on the Incubator stuff right now). I'll reply more later. Anyone else interested? Hen On 4/3/07, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just

FYI: Commons-TLP discussion on common-dev

2007-04-04 Thread Henri Yandell
So people know, I started up a discussion on moving Commons to TLP a couple of days ago. It's looking very positive, so I'll probably go ahead and kick off a vote in a day or so. Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Release Regexp 1.5

2007-03-20 Thread Henri Yandell
On 3/20/07, Vadim Gritsenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Henri Yandell wrote: This 'how we release' conversation has been bouncing around the ASF for 4 months now, the above is my best grok on the summary. I've not seen anyone yet speaking in favour of a view that we should have a vote

Re: [VOTE] Release Regexp 1.5

2007-03-19 Thread Henri Yandell
On 3/18/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 3/14/07, Vadim Gritsenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: You actually have to roll and sign a tarball/zip ball on which the vote happens. Release-then-Vote seems to be the only accepted way by the board

Re: [VOTE] Release Regexp 1.5

2007-03-18 Thread Henri Yandell
On 3/14/07, Vadim Gritsenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: You actually have to roll and sign a tarball/zip ball on which the vote happens. Release-then-Vote seems to be the only accepted way by the board these days; Thankfully, neither events in velocity-private

Re: List moderator cleanup..

2007-02-18 Thread Henri Yandell
Heh. Whereas I go through the spam every now and then and delete the spam and reply with -allow to the good ones (except for announce@ where I always do -accept) and while I reply to -owner I can't do much for people as a moderator any more because gmail.com doesn't seem to work with the list

Re: Howto revive inactive projects ?

2007-02-14 Thread Henri Yandell
On 2/14/07, Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is my take on a revival procedure... Pre-precondition. We need to define what is inactive and place it in such a state. Dormant seems a favourite word. In the recent board report for the Commons components, we've gone with Inactive to

Re: News feed,

2007-02-14 Thread Henri Yandell
Howard knocked it together. XML file that generates HTML and RSS. The news.xml in the jakarta/site/ in svn. Hen On 2/7/07, Danny Angus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see jakarta has a news feed, I'd like to nick the idea for James. How did you do that? d.

Re: Nightly builds docu?

2007-01-18 Thread Henri Yandell
On 1/17/07, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So how about biting the bullet and installing one of the well established and obviously easier tools: * Cruise Control (http://cruisecontrol.sourceforge.net/) Just downloaded this the other day to sit and play with. When last I

Re: Nightly builds docu?

2007-01-17 Thread Henri Yandell
of the dependencies specified in the pom / project.xml, but builds against the latest of everything, which could mean other trouble if you are using those jars. Mvgr, Martin Andrew C. Oliver wrote: Ummwhy not out of Gump? Phil Steitz wrote: Henri Yandell wrote: On 1/16/07, Ortwin Glück [EMAIL

Re: Nightly builds docu?

2007-01-16 Thread Henri Yandell
On 1/16/07, Ortwin Glück [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Does anyone (Henry?) know what happened to http://www.apache.org/dev/nightly-builds.html ? It's referenced from http://www.apache.org/dev/ at the very bottom of the page. I'm looking for information how to get nightly builds done for

Re: My svn account

2007-01-10 Thread Henri Yandell
Martin - maybe if you forward this to root@ and ask if there's anything you can do to help etc, it'd be a good nudge? Hen On 1/10/07, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IIRC, this is my 4th attempt to resolve this (I try like every 3-4 months). I would like to commit something. My SVN

Re: Jakarta Voting

2006-12-21 Thread Henri Yandell
On 12/20/06, David Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Jakarta Board- A suggestion after reading with interest the recent POI vs. Jakarta smoke and flames threads. I think that Jakarta needs a voting application that can include PMC quorum requirements, direct email vote requests, committer

Re: POI TLP -- constructively

2006-12-18 Thread Henri Yandell
On 12/18/06, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sleep Martinsleep. All will be answered, resolved...but not today. Right now I'm going to help my 2 year old draw dinosaurs with his Hanukkah present (he is obsessed with dinosaurs). My 2 year old is obsessed with trains. We let the

Re: [VOTE] Remove POI svn restrictions.

2006-12-17 Thread Henri Yandell
On 12/15/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/15/06, Nick Burch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Martin van den Bemt wrote: Apache legal doesn't know anything about this.. Back when I joined POI, I was told the apache legal team had suggested the requirement

Re: [VOTE] Remove POI svn restrictions.

2006-12-17 Thread Henri Yandell
On 12/17/06, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Avik Sengupta wrote: I'd have been happy seeing POI move to a TLP. However, some of the comments in this thread seem to preclude that possibility either. I think his leaves the community between a rock and a hard place ... I dont

Re: [VOTE] Remove POI svn restrictions.

2006-12-17 Thread Henri Yandell
On 12/17/06, Roland Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Avik, I'd have been happy seeing POI move to a TLP. However, some of the comments in this thread seem to preclude that possibility either. I think his leaves the community between a rock and a hard place ... I dont want us to be

Re: [VOTE] Remove POI svn restrictions.

2006-12-16 Thread Henri Yandell
On 12/15/06, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey I have an idea! If it doesn't pass this time we can call another vote right before the next holiday and hope that none of the POI PMC members are around... Then 3 months later do it again. Reasoning being that Martin has done the

Re: [VOTE] Remove POI svn restrictions.

2006-12-15 Thread Henri Yandell
On 12/15/06, Nick Burch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Martin van den Bemt wrote: Apache legal doesn't know anything about this.. Back when I joined POI, I was told the apache legal team had suggested the requirement. Perhaps one of the older POI committers can supply the

Re: [VOTE] Remove POI svn restrictions.

2006-12-15 Thread Henri Yandell
On 12/15/06, Henning Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hm, does it pose a real legal threat or is it just a felt threat from Andy? As long as we're not soliciting trade secrets - tis good. I suspect this is a case of Andy's lawyer back in the day either having a different opinion or it

Re: [VOTE] Remove POI svn restrictions.

2006-12-15 Thread Henri Yandell
On 12/15/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/15/06, Nick Burch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Martin van den Bemt wrote: Apache legal doesn't know anything about this.. Back when I joined POI, I was told the apache legal team had suggested the requirement

Re: [VOTE] Remove POI svn restrictions.

2006-12-15 Thread Henri Yandell
On 12/15/06, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -1. You are of course misrepresenting the issue but okay. It is also because of the legal issues. Go read the archive and provide a good faith assertion rather than making an assumption. If YOU want to work on POI please submit some

Re: [site] proposed changes

2006-12-05 Thread Henri Yandell
On 12/4/06, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why not just move all of the content of all of these pages to the wiki and change the links. Or better still have a section of wiki links in the right hand nav for them. Linking to pages in the wiki is bad, I think. When a page in a

Re: svn commit: r482344 - in /jakarta/site: docs/site/news/news-2006-q4.html docs/site/rss.xml news.xml

2006-12-05 Thread Henri Yandell
On 12/4/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: bayard Date: Mon Dec 4 12:34:35 2006 New Revision: 482344 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=482344 Log: Fixed up the Digester news item to inline the links rather

Re: [site] proposed changes

2006-12-04 Thread Henri Yandell
On 12/4/06, Danny Angus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2. Vendor support. This is getting increasingly threadbare - so raising the removal of this again. Content to be moved to the Wiki. Why not just move all of the content of all of these pages to the wiki and change the links. Or better still

[site] proposed changes

2006-12-03 Thread Henri Yandell
Back on a kick to clean up the site a bit more. Removals: 1. Remove the faqs page. It's getting low on content. 2. Vendor support. This is getting increasingly threadbare - so raising the removal of this again. Content to be moved to the Wiki. 3. Removal of the JSPA Agreement link. It's very

Re: commons-fileupload: Streaming mode

2006-11-04 Thread Henri Yandell
for commons-fileupload)? Thanks, -dain On Nov 2, 2006, at 12:38 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: Our (Commons) nightly build machine (vmbuild.apache.org) was on a vmware zone that hasn't come back after the machine migration. It took care of both the nightly dist build and the m1 snapshot repo

Re: commons-fileupload: Streaming mode

2006-11-02 Thread Henri Yandell
Our (Commons) nightly build machine (vmbuild.apache.org) was on a vmware zone that hasn't come back after the machine migration. It took care of both the nightly dist build and the m1 snapshot repo deployments. I'll pester for info again on it tomorrow; last I heard was that we don't have vmware

Jira Groups

2006-10-16 Thread Henri Yandell
With my JIRA Admin hat on, I've decided that my idea to have separate Jakarta dev and admin groups was dumb and I've rolled the two together and given Jakarta developers admin rights (which just means they can change versions/components pretty much). Hen

Jakarta BOF @ ApacheCon

2006-10-10 Thread Henri Yandell
Bit late, but I don't see anything on the list about this recently so thought I'd remind/inform people that there's a Jakarta BOF at 9pm tomorrow (Wednesday) night. I'm not sure of the room, but it's the same one as the Directory BOF. Hen

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Commons Lang 2.2 released

2006-10-04 Thread Henri Yandell
jars should be on iBiblio for Maven users as soon as the sync runs. Please report any problems to either the commons-dev mailing list or our JIRA instance (see the Lang site at http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/lang/ for more details). Henri Yandell on behalf of the Commons community

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >