for the host can be simple as:
Compile it with what? Are the sources in stage3, or downloaded so that
I can compile a suitable Gentoo kernel within the chroot?
If you've never installed Gentoo anywhere I wouldn't suggest doing it
for the first time under Xen.
Gentoo stage3s include neither
as been
>> released, though it doesn't look like it is packaged in Gentoo yet.
>> I've been running upstream's git for a while (currently on 4.4.26).
>>
>> --
>> Rich
>>
> Would a Gentoo .config work with the upstream "vanilla" 4.4.26 kernel?
>
Jarry wrote:
So, with your help I finally checked all software installed on my
gentoo-server (thanks to everyone, who replied). There were a few
gentoo-sources (I think 5 or 6 different versions), so I used
emerge --prune gentoo-sources to leave only the last one.
Then I checked /usr/src
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Matthew R. Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just ran emerge --depclean and missed that it was going to remove
gentoo-sources-2.6.22-r2, the sources for the kernel I'm currently using.
Now what I'm not sure about is, do I need the sources, or is the kernel image
2006/12/12, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:05:42 +0800, Chuanwen Wu wrote:
Yes, install mm-sources and use that instead of gentoo-sources.
alternatively apply only the resier4 patch to gentoo-sources. Trying to
apply the whole mm patchset to gentoo-sources is bound
On 02/23/2012 10:25 AM, Mick wrote:
On Thursday 23 Feb 2012 08:10:56 Coert Waagmeester wrote:
Hello all,
Usually on gentoo when gentoo-sources gets updated, updating the kernel
went as follows:
eselect kernel set {new kernel}
cd /usr/src/linux
make menuconfig
and then there was a totally
On Thursday 15 May 2008, Matthew R. Lee wrote:
I just ran emerge --depclean and missed that it was going to remove
gentoo-sources-2.6.22-r2, the sources for the kernel I'm currently
using. Now what I'm not sure about is, do I need the sources, or is
the kernel image in /boot sufficient. Do I
/gentoo/
ftp://ftp.heanet.ie/pub/gentoo/
http://mirror.hamakor.org.il/pub/mirrors/gentoo/
http://www.die.unipd.it/pub/Linux/distributions/gentoo-sources/
ftp://ftp.unina.it/pub/linux/distributions/gentoo
http://ftp.snt.utwente.nl/pub/os/linux/gentoo
ftp://ftp.snt.utwente.nl/pub/os/linux/gentoo
Hmm, what is my mistake ...
I compiled the latest gentoo-sources-3.19.1 with Canek's kerninst tool.
It is configured to generate a loader-entry for the gummiboot bootloader.
That bootloader is the default entry in the UEFI boot order and it works
... I can boot the older kernels
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 06:33:05PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 21/04/2020 18:05, Gerion Entrup wrote:
> > gentoo-kernel: ???
>
> Unfortunately he didn't say anything about gentoo-kernel-bin. So... no idea.
gentoo-kernel-bin is, as its description on packages.gentoo.or
patches from https://dev.gentoo.org/~mpagano/dist/genpatches
The wording is horrible, but as the suffix ("-bin") would suggest, the former is
a binary .xpak package, whereas the latter is base kernel sources with
additional Gentoo developers' patches.
--
Ashley Dixon
suugaku.co.uk
Now I was woundering, which way would Gentoo choose or if that is not
package specific at all. Are you sure dlopen() is used as a general
approach on Gentoo?
Gentoo doesn't choose anything; it's up to the programs to decide how they
want to load libraries at runtime. It's like asking
and run an old 3.x kernel on a Desktop PC for
> > some very specific tests. Would Gentoo be a good solution?
> >
> > I see that currently gentoo-sources only includes 4.x and 5.x sources.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > raffaele
> >
>
> I use a 3.1
compared to other distros.
Why convolute the already-intimidating Handbook with additional choices, when
one route (gentoo-sources) will almost-always be preferred ? Although, I agree
it should be explained somewhere in the Wiki (or even in the package's
descriptions), just
-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.23* (if you feel like waiting a
little longer). Otherwise, use xen-sources and the xen ebuilds.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Konstantinos Agouros wrote:
I have an instance of hardened sources using selinux as a
webserver. 2.6.16 is running fine however 2.6.18-r6 boots up, but
it's terribly slow
The 2.6.18 kernel was slow for me too (normal gentoo-sources), not
terribly, but noticeably sluggish. You might try
On Fri August 26 2005 01:21 pm, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
I have a modified gentoo-sources-2.6.11-r11 ebuild that I've been using
as an overlay and it's been working fine for me for months. I'll be
happy to share if anyone is interested.
Yes please.
Ok. You can get the ebuild tree sys
http://www.milw0rm.com/exploits/2006
This is on a GentooLInux Box 2.6.16-suspend2-r1 kernel.
updating to gentoo sources 2.6.16-r12 (2.6.16.24) or 2.6.17-r2
(2.6.17.4) also fixes it. genpatch-2.6.16-14 is the important file if
you're using other sources and the ebuild for
suspend2-sources
are expected to change the symlink to the newly
installed sources.
But then it says:
4. Updating the /usr/src/linux symbolic link
Gentoo requires that the /usr/src/linux symbolic link points to the
sources of the kernel you are running.
So if gentoo `requires' the symlink to point to the running kernel
into the mainline
kernel? Are they just not stable in some fashion? Do they exclude some
kernel functionality? Do they impact performance?
What exactly is this patch set, and why is it separate?
I think it's essentially gentoo-sources with the grsecurity patchset
on top. Check out the Gentoo
Konstantinos Agouros wrote, at 01/07/2012 03:51 PM:
since xen got into the mainstream kernel the way to go is to use
gentoo-sources for dom0 and the domUs. However the blktap modules are not
there. Is there any way to get this to work?
blktap drivers were excluded from kernel mainline since 3
Hi,
since I upgraded my xen system to gentoo-sources-3.3.8 I experience that
the system panics every 5-6 days. Since I am running X at the time and
it immediately reboots I don't have a chance to see why this is happening.
With XEN-Sources 2.6.34 before I did not have this problem. Anybody
else
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:44 AM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote:
My mojo seems to be broken lately :( I just updated a gentoo vbox guest
from ck-sources-3.6.11-r1 to 3.7.10 and I'm seeing file-system corruption
and a segfaulting NetworkManager during bootup.
I went back one snapshot and I'm
the
> options were initialised to what they were in my 4.9.16 running kernel.
I don't use gentoo-sources. Nothing against it, it's just that I got
used to upgrade by hand, once in a while...
But the kernel of gentoo-sources would be patched, if anything. The
vanilla kernel should have the usual penguins.
thanks
Jorge
> >
> > > % cat /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords/kernel
> > > sys-kernel/gentoo-sources -~amd64
> > > sys-kernel/linux-headers -~amd64
> > >
> > > Works for me.
> >
> > Uh, that will pull unstable kernels, at least as far
On Sat, 10 Oct 2020 13:36:26 -0400,
Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> On Sat, 10 Oct 2020 13:20:09 -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>
> > How can I emerge the sources for this version of the kernel? I think
> > John suggested 5.4.69.
>
> emerge -1a gentoo-sources:5.4.
Installed packages with a version not in the database (or masked):
As it says this apps are either not in the database or masked.
kde-base/kdeaddons-docs-konq-plugins-3.5.9 masked
kde-base/kdeaddons-kfile-plugins-3.5.9 masked
kde-base/kdeaddons-meta-3.5.9 masked
sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
William Kenworthy wrote:
An emerge world wants to install em8300-modules which according to
equery is caused by sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.27-r3 which is
installed but not in use - yet.
As em8300 wont build, and I dont have a one (I presume its a video
chip-set??) I dont want to fuss
Hi,
Dale wrote on 20/11/08 02:40:
William Kenworthy wrote:
An emerge world wants to install em8300-modules which according to
equery is caused by sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.27-r3 which is
installed but not in use - yet.
As em8300 wont build, and I dont have a one (I presume its a video
9 server running Win4Lin Terminal Server. I'm
trying to migrate this server AWAY from Mandrake to Gentoo.
There are referrences everywhere that indicates there's a win4lin-
sources kernel but I have yet to find it anywhere.
Does Gentoo still support Win4Lin out of the box as Netraverse
On Tuesday 06 February 2007, Gabriel Rossetti wrote:
Hello,
I emerge a kernel, let's say gentoo-sources-2.6.19-r5, I create the
linux link, then cd inside
and compile/install it. I reboot and I get lots of errors from modules,
I do a uname -a
and notice that it still says 2.6.19-r4, i
Hi,
how can I get the emerge manpage without installing gentoo?
I try to asnwer the some questions about emerge before deciding to
install Gentoo. Beside other things I am interested, whether Emerge
will delete or not the downloaded sources after an successfull
install and whether emerge
starting X.
I ran into the same problem after upgrading the kernel to
gentoo-sources-2.6.16-r3.
And don't have any problems with most recent nvidia drivers:
media-video/nvidia-glx-1.0.8756
media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.8756
media-video/nvidia-settings-1.0.20051122-r3
Did you rebuild nvidia-glx and all
Hi,
One more question if I might. What does this message mean? I'm
guessing that a patch in my patch file has already been applied in
gentoo-sources? If so then it would seem that I'd want to skip it. Is
that correct? Skipping the patch would seem reasonable if that's what
this means.
Or am
Mark Knecht wrote:
Hi,
One more question if I might. What does this message mean? I'm
guessing that a patch in my patch file has already been applied in
gentoo-sources? If so then it would seem that I'd want to skip it. Is
that correct? Skipping the patch would seem reasonable if that's
Thanks for this information. It helped to solve my problem. :)
Uwe
Daniel Drake wrote:
Sean Higgins wrote:
Did you recently update your kernel? There is a problem with
gentoo-sources-2.6.12-r4. There is a bug in iptables that causes problems
with KDE logins. If you stop iptables, your
Hi there
i use an ati graphicscard with fglrx, and since this f* driver does not
work with 2.6.12-kernels, i wondered if i could emerge old kernels...
so i wnet out there into portage to visit sys-kernel/gentoo-sources, and
only found an old version of the kernel matching 2.6.9-r9
so i
a different mirror. (may get a file that matches the manifest)
3. ebuild
/usr/portage/sys-kernel/gentoo-sources/gentoo-sources-2.6.16-r12.ebuild
digest
This rebuilds the manifest to match what you have. This should be
your *last* resort!
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Usually when you get digest failures, you can:
1. What a while, then emerge --sync again. (may update the manifest)
2. Try a different mirror. (may get a file that matches the manifest)
3. ebuild
/usr/portage/sys-kernel/gentoo-sources/gentoo-sources-2.6.16-r12.ebuild
digest
.
2.6.16-r12 is protected from this bug. From the ChangeLog:
*gentoo-sources-2.6.16-r12 (06 Jul 2006)
06 Jul 2006; Daniel Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+gentoo-sources-2.6.16-r12.ebuild:
Update to Linux 2.6.16.24 for coredump privilege escalation security fix
However, there is a new security bug
a kernel with a 16k
stack, so the standard vanilla-sources would not work...
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[Timothy A. Holmes]
I am using gentoo sources
Timothy A. Holmes
IT Manager / Network Admin / Web Master / Computer Teacher
Medina Christian Academy
A Higher Standard
On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 21:29:36 -0700, Jim Cunning wrote:
I am currently running kernel 2.6.25-r7 and have an emerge that fails
because it can't find a Makefile for the kernel. I somehow no longer
can run genkernel, or emerge sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.25-r7. I
would rather not upgrade my
Hello fellows,
I'm trying to confirm a bug with kernel 2.6.33 (gentoo-sources) in order to
fill a bug to upstream.
After the update, I'm having a very weird behaviour with hibernation (suspend-
to-disk). If I'm only at console with KDM opened, I can successfully hibernate
my system and resume
Dear All,
I updated my system and there is a new gentoo-sources version
3.2.0-gentoo-r1. I reconfigured my system to use this kernel and I
compiled the kernel with genkernel. But there is no compiled file
under /boot directory. Did I missed something? Is there anything new
in genkernel? Should I
On 22/02/13 08:14, Joseph wrote:
I just upgraded system including kernel to 3.5.7 because of udev-197
Now I have a blank screen, not even console login (I can only access is
via ssh)
With NVidia, it is usually a good idea to at least use the latest stable
gentoo-sources. So you should use
On 12/11/2014 08:02:12 AM, Yuri K. Shatroff wrote:
Hi gentoo-users,
Yesterday I installed and compiled gentoo-sources-3.18.0, everything
seems to be in order but google-chrome just doesn't display any page
(even settings), showing a blue screen with Oops instead. In Firefox,
everything
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 23:22:58 +0100, Bob Wya wrote:
I'm getting a bit bogged down trying to build an early release of the
3.18 kernel. Since I can't automatically go back before 3.18.9 now
(using portage anyway)...
https://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/sys-kernel/gentoo
with gentoo? I built and installed the latest kdbus
> with gentoo-sources 4.3.6.
kdbus was discontinued back in October, so it shouldn't be used at all
as far as I know.
is in the tree. You just need to unmask (~amd64/...) it.
Both as gentoo-sources and as vanilla-sources.
--
Joost
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 11:20 AM Grant Taylor
wrote:
>
> After the good input that I received in the "Preventing new versions of
> gentoo-sources…" thread, I figured I'd ask this question:
>
> Is there a way to cause ebuild file to limit the version of other
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 10:23 PM Matt Connell wrote:
>
> On 2020-02-06 11:40, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> > 5.4 has just become the newest LTS.
>
> I see that now. But my original question still stands as to why the
> stable version of gentoo-sources is consistently a few version
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 11:03:30PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 17:46:47 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
>
> > Another item that may or may not be related... emerging Gentoo sources
> > did not create a symlink from "linux-5.10.27-gentoo" to "linux
dn't really matter (and I
> don't think they'd touch this part of the code anyway). Personally I'd
> make the patches against the vanilla sources.
That's just what I'm doing, for these reasons. I'm not even sure Gentoo
maintains a git repository with all the gentoo-sources realeases.
>
Am Donnerstag, den 22.02.2007, 15:30 -0800 schrieb Grant:
On one of my Gentoo systems, portage wants to re-emerge
hardened-sources-2.6.16-r10 and hardened-sources-2.6.14-r7 because of
(-doc%). I'm currently using hardened-sources-2.6.18-hardened, but
whenever new kernel sources
Hali!
Try --update instead of update
# emerge --update portage
And the kernel source build name is gentoo-sources
# emerge gentoo-sources
malary
http://malary.hu
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 30
is broken.
Uh oh, in that case we all are in trouble! :)
I grab my sources directly from kernel.org and then apply the patch
from grsecurity.org. Then I can choose what security features to
enable, and it's a little adventure. What I used to do (when I was
running Slackware rather than Gentoo
On Sun, 11 Oct 2020 09:23:29 -0700, Daniel Frey wrote:
> I have nvidia-drivers installed. It has a dependency to
> virtual/linux-sources.
>
> The problem is it's always trying to pull in unstable packages when I
> have two slotted kernels in world:
>
> sys-kernel/gentoo
Tom Naujokas:
> I have run sys-kernel/ck-sources for years and it has been working well.Â
> Just updated and got this message:
>
> Â Â !!! The following installed packages are masked:
> Â Â - sys-kernel/ck-sources-5.4.48::gentoo (masked by: package.mask)
> Â Â /var/db/rep
with these new sys-kernel/ck-sources?
I could only see they have additional patches (in addition to those
of gentoo-sources).
But I didn't find which patches and why these have only been applied
to ck-sources?
Thanks for your opinion,
Helmut.
if you have more than 2 cores, you
wrote:
Hi,
has anybody experience with these new sys-kernel/ck-sources?
I could only see they have additional patches (in addition to those
of gentoo-sources).
But I didn't find which patches and why these have only been applied
to ck-sources?
Thanks for your opinion,
Helmut.
if you have more
On 5/16/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I grab my sources directly from kernel.org and then apply the patch
from grsecurity.org. Then I can choose what security features to
enable, and it's a little adventure
Rumen Yotov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Better to use
On 5/16/05, Michael Haan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/16/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I grab my sources directly from kernel.org and then apply the patch
from grsecurity.org. Then I can choose what security features to
enable, and it's a little adventure
gt;> The syntax is not described in detail... I tried these:
>>
>> /etc/portage/package.provided
>>
>> >=sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-4.1.6
>>
>> Still `emerge -vp gentoo-sources' indicates it will install the most
>> recent kernel.
>>
>>
provided' is meant for such things.
>>>
>>> The syntax is not described in detail... I tried these:
>>>
>>> /etc/portage/package.provided
>>>
>>> >=sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-4.1.6
>>>
>>> Still `emerge -vp gentoo-so
On 02/01/18 19:26, Stroller wrote:
>
>> On 2 Jan 2018, at 11:54, Kruglov Sergey <kr_se...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Now I have gentoo-sources-4.14.8-r1 installed.
>> After "emerge --ask --update --deep --with-bdeps=y --newuse @world" command
>&
not
getting why this happens.
I want to `unmerge' (-C) versions of gentoo-sources prior to -2.6.20-r6
However this fails:
root # emerge -vpC gentoo-sources-2.6.20-r6
These are the packages that would be unmerged:
--- Couldn't find 'gentoo-sources-2.6.20-r6' to unmerge
it with the
maintainer of the -ck sources, or switch to vanilla for the testing.
But either way it seems like a kernel bug to me...
-Richard
Yep, I will try initramfs on the problematic PC tomorrow.
Bug-report...Well I'm very confused here. Isn't it Gentoo the right
place to file
a bug-report
is
gentoo-sources-2.6.35-r12. So my system's pretty clean, but I'm quite
puzzled with this result.
I have 5 versions of gentoo-sources installed, and the one it wants to
ditch
is the one I'm actually using. I can understand why it wouldn't care
about
that, but why
Hi Gentoo-users,
what an unpleasant surprise awaited me today when I tried to
update my systems: gentoo-sources want to be installed everywhere!
---
# emerge --pretend --update --deep --newuse --verbose world
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating
portage', a file named
>>> `package.provided' is meant for such things.
>>>
>>> The syntax is not described in detail... I tried these:
>>>
>>> /etc/portage/package.provided
>>>
>>> >=sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-4.1.6
>>>
&
kage.provided' is meant for such things.
> >
> > The syntax is not described in detail... I tried these:
> >
> > /etc/portage/package.provided
> >
> > >=sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-4.1.6
> >
> > Still `emerge -vp gentoo-sources' indicates it will install the mo
in detail... I tried these:
>
> /etc/portage/package.provided
>
> >=sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-4.1.6
>
> Still `emerge -vp gentoo-sources' indicates it will install the most
> recent kernel.
>
> then I noticed the portage man page, under `Format' does say:
> "relatio
After installing sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.19 I have tried
to reinstall lirc and got the error shown below.
Where is my fault?
===
...
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/wrk/tmp/portage/portage/app-misc/lirc-0.8.0-r6/work/lirc-0.8.0'
Source compiled
to be downloaded and unpacked it, successfully chrooted to the new system,
and reached the compiling the kernel section without a glitch.
And the then the trouble began. I emerged gentoo-sources, and it ran fine for
about five minutes, and then (choosing the moment when I decided all was well
gentoo-sources. Something about not being able to
resolve the kernel URLS.
I suspect it is a problem in the ebuild itself, but I was not able to
find where `portage' is on disc during that build. I wanted to
attempt editing the ebuild but even with variable:
REMOVE_PORTAGE_TREE NO
I never find
a
beautiful overview of what the emerge --sync changed and keeps the eix
cache
up to date.
That souds pretty interesting (eix-sync). I'll have to look into that.
eix -e gentoo-sources
* sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
Available versions: 2.4.28-r9 ~2.4.31-r1 2.6.9-r9 2.6.12-r9
2.6.12-r10 ~2.6.13 ~2.6.13-r1
that portage wants to emerge, but there aren't any kernel updates.
However,
if I run emerge -uDvp world, there is a new version of the gentoo-sources
(2.6.12-r9). Why wouldn't kernel updates be included in a system emerge?
The packages in your system come from
/etc/make.profile/packages
(Note: do
2:49 CEST, Raffaele BELARDI
> >
> wrote:
> > >Hello,
> > >
> > >I might need to build and run an old 3.x kernel on a Desktop PC for
> > >some very specific tests. Would Gentoo be a good solution?
> > >I see that currently gentoo-sources only includes
On 29/01/2014 15:23, James wrote:
Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon at gmail.com writes:
Is there a way to specify that I want to install (emerge) the latest
3.10.X series of sys-kernel/gentoo-sources as a slot, in parallel with
the latest gentoo-sources?
that won't work as each kernel ebuild
in the portage tree. On my system this gives:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 46 Apr 15 11:16 /etc/make.profile
- /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2005.0
packages:
-
sys-kernel/ac-sources-2.5
sys-kernel/ck-sources-2.5
sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.5
sys-kernel/grsec-sources
require a link to the kernel
sources, and then only for the sources you want to build the module
against, not the currently running version.
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 09:17 +0100, Uwe Klosa wrote:
Hi
When I updrade my kernel from suspend2-sources-2.6.14 to -r1 or r3 all
options for SUSPEND2 are gone. I have tried with make oldconfig
and make menuconfig. Is there a purpose behind that?
I'm not sure on the exact version it happened
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 11:30:51 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
The testign version is better, but sort of strange. For
gentoo-sources it gave a nice readable list. However for rt-sources it
didn't.
Any reason for wanting them to look different or is this a bug that
should be reported
On 20/04/10 09:47, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
has anybody experience with these new sys-kernel/ck-sources?
I could only see they have additional patches (in addition to those
of gentoo-sources).
But I didn't find which patches and why these have only been applied to
ck-sources?
Thanks
On 20 Apr, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Dienstag 20 April 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
has anybody experience with these new sys-kernel/ck-sources?
I could only see they have additional patches (in addition to those
of gentoo-sources).
But I didn't find which patches and why
On Dienstag 20 April 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
On 20 Apr, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Dienstag 20 April 2010, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
has anybody experience with these new sys-kernel/ck-sources?
I could only see they have additional patches (in addition to those
of gentoo
On 08/01/2014 01:19 PM, behrouz khosravi wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:58 PM, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
Howdy,
I know I can use this option to protect kernel sources I
want to keep around, from removal, via depclean.
Well I not a proficient user, but I think that depclean
[2019-05-25 09:06] tu...@posteo.de
>
> part text/plain 670
> Hi,
Hi,
> I thought, alsa could handle multiple sources of sound
> simultanously...
That only works if you have dmix enabled and set all audio sources to use the
dmix devices as the default audio
On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 at 16:44, Daniel Frey wrote:
> Does anyone have any idea where to look next to see why this is being
> pulled in?
You should probably just refer to your previous thread, because all
the same info still applies. You need to mask gentoo-sources and
unmask the versions yo
On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 16:56:38 +0100, Arve Barsnes wrote:
> > Does anyone have any idea where to look next to see why this is being
> > pulled in?
>
> You should probably just refer to your previous thread, because all
> the same info still applies. You need to mask gentoo
/src.
Also your linux symlink is quite old compared to the other
gentoo-sources you have installed. Is that intentional or do you need
to manually update the symlink?
Regards,
Todd
-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.23-r3 not in the tree and thus not in
the eix-database anymore.
x11-apps/xinit-1.0.5-r2 masked
I guess portage will downgrade the masked ones if you run emerge -uND
world, so if you want them put them in package.keywords. You can
remove gentoo-sources from /etc/portage
)? Just
curious, I always just used the rm -fr
Myk Taylor wrote:
emerge -C gentoo-sources-2.6.12-r10
or
emerge -C =gentoo-sources-2.6.12-r10
-C is short for --unmerge
C. Beamer wrote:
I would like to remove the oldest one - specifically
linux-2.6.12-gentoo-r10
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org
OT
Is it possible to install lm_sensors with gentoo-kernel too, or only
with genkernel? I tried with gentoo-sources, but got this error:
_
* Determining the location of the kernel source code
* Found kernel source directory:
* /usr
Daniel da Veiga wrote:
On 2/16/06, Bo Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 16 February 2006 19:35, gentuxx wrote:
Hmmm, shouldn't it be emerge -uav gentoo-sources ?
I mean, u for update?
emerge -uav gentoo-sources
These are the packages that I would merge, in order
On Saturday 19 July 2008, Amar Cosic wrote:
Hello all
I am about to install Gentoo on laptop for first time.I use
gentoo-sources on desktop but I would like to know is there maybe
something better for laptop? Also, I would appreciate if someone
could give me some of yours make.conf's you use
-gentoo-r8, and voila - no problem, for nearly half a day.
As soon as I reactivate 2.6.25 or 26, cpufreqd produces the error-messages.
sys-power/cpufreqd-2.1.1
sys-power/cpufrequtils-002-r3
sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.24-r8 (works)
sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.25-r7 (problem?)
sys-kernel/gentoo
an update to
* media-gfx/splashutils
Latest version available: 1.1.9.6-r1
Latest version installed: 1.1.9.6-r1
did something change?
I think so. I noticed gentoo-sources has moved to 2.6.12. Reading the
changelog for gentoo-sources:
Initial 2.6.12 release. Features inotify
Hi,
After upgrading to gentoo-sources 2.6.14-r2 and cisco-vpnclient-3des
4.6.03.0190-r1 the cisco-vpnclient installs in the wrong directory.
Here is a snippet from emerge cisco-vpnclient-3des
# emerge cisco-vpnclient-3des
Calculating dependencies ...done!
emerge (1 of 1) net-misc/cisco
On Sunday 20 November 2005 13.58, Dan Johansson wrote:
Hi,
After upgrading to gentoo-sources 2.6.14-r2 and cisco-vpnclient-3des
4.6.03.0190-r1 the cisco-vpnclient installs in the wrong directory.
Here is a snippet from emerge cisco-vpnclient-3des
# emerge cisco-vpnclient-3des
Calculating
601 - 700 of 6431 matches
Mail list logo
