Re: [Gimp-user] ERROR: configuration_data.set10 got unknown keyword arguments "Description"
On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 2:20 AM Pei JIA via gimp-user-list wrote: > > Thank you very much... I made some progress, but there are still some *test > errors*: > > FAIL0.18s (exit status 255 or signal 127 > SIGinvalid)>>> MALLOC_PERTURB_=13 > BABL_PATH=..babl-0.1.92/builddir/extensions These parts of your error log indicate that there might be memory corruption/unititialized memory use problems. However, all the tests pass on my machines, also when run under valgrind which should report on the same type of issues as MALLOC_PERTURB_ does. /pippin ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] ERROR: configuration_data.set10 got unknown keyword arguments "Description"
Thank you very much... I made some progress, but there are still some *test errors*: *➜ babl-0.1.92 meson test -C builddirninja: Entering directory `..babl-0.1.92/builddir'ninja: no work to do. 1/28 babl_class_name OK 0.19s 2/28 cairo_cmyk_hack FAIL0.19s (exit status 255 or signal 127 SIGinvalid)>>> MALLOC_PERTURB_=17 BABL_PATH=..babl-0.1.92/builddir/extensions ..babl-0.1.92/builddir/tests/cairo_cmyk_hack 3/28 cairo-RGB24 FAIL0.18s (exit status 255 or signal 127 SIGinvalid)>>> MALLOC_PERTURB_=13 BABL_PATH=..babl-0.1.92/builddir/extensions ..babl-0.1.92/builddir/tests/cairo-RGB24 4/28 cmyk OK 0.18s 5/28 chromaticities OK 0.18s 6/28 conversions FAIL0.18s (exit status 255 or signal 127 SIGinvalid)>>> MALLOC_PERTURB_=234 BABL_PATH=..babl-0.1.92/builddir/extensions ..babl-0.1.92/builddir/tests/conversions 7/28 extract OK 0.17s 8/28 floatclamp OK 0.17s 9/28 float-to-8bit OK 0.17s10/28 format_with_space FAIL 0.17s (exit status 255 or signal 127 SIGinvalid)>>> MALLOC_PERTURB_=63 BABL_PATH=..babl-0.1.92/builddir/extensions ..babl-0.1.92/builddir/tests/format_with_space11/28 grayscale_to_rgb OK 0.17s12/28 hsl FAIL0.17s (exit status 255 or signal 127 SIGinvalid)>>> MALLOC_PERTURB_=141 BABL_PATH=..babl-0.1.92/builddir/extensions ..babl-0.1.92/builddir/tests/hsl13/28 hsva FAIL0.16s (exit status 255 or signal 127 SIGinvalid)>>> MALLOC_PERTURB_=83 BABL_PATH=..babl-0.1.92/builddir/extensions ..babl-0.1.92/builddir/tests/hsva14/28 models OK 0.16s15/28 n_components_cast OK 0.15s16/28 nop OK 0.15s17/28 rgb_to_bgr OK 0.15s18/28 rgb_to_ycbcrOK 0.15s19/28 sanity OK 0.14s20/28 srgb_to_lab_u8 FAIL0.14s (exit status 255 or signal 127 SIGinvalid)>>> MALLOC_PERTURB_=142 BABL_PATH=..babl-0.1.92/builddir/extensions ..babl-0.1.92/builddir/tests/srgb_to_lab_u821/28 transparent OK 0.14s22/28 alpha_symmetric_transform OK 0.14s23/28 types OK 0.13s24/28 xyz_to_lab FAIL 0.13s (exit status 255 or signal 127 SIGinvalid)>>> MALLOC_PERTURB_=125 BABL_PATH=..babl-0.1.92/builddir/extensions ..babl-0.1.92/builddir/tests/xyz_to_lab25/28 concurrency-stress-test OK 0.13s26/28 palette OK 0.24s27/28 n_componentsOK 0.32s28/28 palette-concurrency-stress-test OK 0.30sOk: 20 Expected Fail: 0 Fail: 8 Unexpected Pass:0 Skipped:0 Timeout: 0 * Any further suggestions? Cheers Pei On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 9:31 AM Øyvind Kolås wrote: > This is a problem arising due to newer versions of meson failing on > what earlier versions of meson considered OK. It is in babl master by > this commit > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/babl/-/commit/b05b2826365a7dbc6ca1bf0977b848055cd0cbb6 > if you are building GIMP yourself it is likely best to build all of > babl, GEGL and GIMP from the respective git tips. > > /pippin > > On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 5:42 AM Pei JIA via gimp-user-list > wrote: > > > > Hi, all: > > > > I'm trying to build babl-0.1.92, under environment: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *➜ ~ lsb_release -aNo LSB modules are available.Distributor ID: > > UbuntuDescription: Ubuntu 22.04 LTSRelease: 22.04Codename: jammy➜ ~ gcc > > --versiongcc (Ubuntu 11.2.0-19ubuntu1) 11.2.0Copyright (C) 2021 Free > > Software Foundation, Inc.This is free software; see the source for > copying > > conditions. There is NOwarranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS > > FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.* > > > > but failed with the ERROR mentioned in the title: > > > > *meson.build:58:5: ERROR: configuration_data.set10 got unknown keyword > > arguments "Description"* > > Can anybody give me a hand? Thank you > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *➜ babl-0.1.92 meson --prefix /usr --buildtype=plain builddirThe Meson > > build systemVersion: 0.62.1Source dir: ../babl-0.1.92Build dir: > > ../babl-0.1.92/builddirBuild type: native buildProject name: > > bablProject version: 0.1.92C compiler for the host machine: cc (gcc > 11.2.0 > > "cc (Ubuntu 11.2.0-19ubuntu1) 11.2.0")C linker for the host machine: cc > > ld.bfd 2.38Host machine cpu family: x86_64Host machine cpu: x86_64Program > > python3 found: YES (/usr/bin
Re: [Gimp-user] ERROR: configuration_data.set10 got unknown keyword arguments "Description"
This is a problem arising due to newer versions of meson failing on what earlier versions of meson considered OK. It is in babl master by this commit https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/babl/-/commit/b05b2826365a7dbc6ca1bf0977b848055cd0cbb6 if you are building GIMP yourself it is likely best to build all of babl, GEGL and GIMP from the respective git tips. /pippin On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 5:42 AM Pei JIA via gimp-user-list wrote: > > Hi, all: > > I'm trying to build babl-0.1.92, under environment: > > > > > > > > > > > > *➜ ~ lsb_release -aNo LSB modules are available.Distributor ID: > UbuntuDescription: Ubuntu 22.04 LTSRelease: 22.04Codename: jammy➜ ~ gcc > --versiongcc (Ubuntu 11.2.0-19ubuntu1) 11.2.0Copyright (C) 2021 Free > Software Foundation, Inc.This is free software; see the source for copying > conditions. There is NOwarranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS > FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.* > > but failed with the ERROR mentioned in the title: > > *meson.build:58:5: ERROR: configuration_data.set10 got unknown keyword > arguments "Description"* > Can anybody give me a hand? Thank you > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *➜ babl-0.1.92 meson --prefix /usr --buildtype=plain builddirThe Meson > build systemVersion: 0.62.1Source dir: ../babl-0.1.92Build dir: > ../babl-0.1.92/builddirBuild type: native buildProject name: > bablProject version: 0.1.92C compiler for the host machine: cc (gcc 11.2.0 > "cc (Ubuntu 11.2.0-19ubuntu1) 11.2.0")C linker for the host machine: cc > ld.bfd 2.38Host machine cpu family: x86_64Host machine cpu: x86_64Program > python3 found: YES (/usr/bin/python3)meson.build:58:5: ERROR: > configuration_data.set10 got unknown keyword arguments "Description"* > > > > Cheers > > -- > > Pei JIA, Ph.D. > > Email: jp4w...@gmail.com > cell in Canada:+1 778-863-5816 > cell in China: +86 186-8244-3503 > > Welcome to Vision Open > http://www.visionopen.com > ___ > gimp-user-list mailing list > List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org > List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list > List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] ERROR: configuration_data.set10 got unknown keyword arguments "Description"
Hi, all: I'm trying to build babl-0.1.92, under environment: *➜ ~ lsb_release -aNo LSB modules are available.Distributor ID: UbuntuDescription: Ubuntu 22.04 LTSRelease: 22.04Codename: jammy➜ ~ gcc --versiongcc (Ubuntu 11.2.0-19ubuntu1) 11.2.0Copyright (C) 2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NOwarranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.* but failed with the ERROR mentioned in the title: *meson.build:58:5: ERROR: configuration_data.set10 got unknown keyword arguments "Description"* Can anybody give me a hand? Thank you *➜ babl-0.1.92 meson --prefix /usr --buildtype=plain builddirThe Meson build systemVersion: 0.62.1Source dir: ../babl-0.1.92Build dir: ../babl-0.1.92/builddirBuild type: native buildProject name: bablProject version: 0.1.92C compiler for the host machine: cc (gcc 11.2.0 "cc (Ubuntu 11.2.0-19ubuntu1) 11.2.0")C linker for the host machine: cc ld.bfd 2.38Host machine cpu family: x86_64Host machine cpu: x86_64Program python3 found: YES (/usr/bin/python3)meson.build:58:5: ERROR: configuration_data.set10 got unknown keyword arguments "Description"* Cheers -- Pei JIA, Ph.D. Email: jp4w...@gmail.com cell in Canada:+1 778-863-5816 cell in China: +86 186-8244-3503 Welcome to Vision Open http://www.visionopen.com ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error Adding Brushes
Great, thank you for your help! ---Original Message--- From: Alexandre Prokoudine via gimp-user-list Date: 01/06/2020 02:32:04 PM Cc: GIMP-user-list Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Error Adding Brushes > Supporting more file format versions of ABR is a known feature > request. We have a quick fix that we haven't applied yet. We need to > review it, and if it's good enough, this will make it to the next > release. The quick fix is now applied and tested. To be available in version 2.10.16. Alex ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error Adding Brushes
> Supporting more file format versions of ABR is a known feature > request. We have a quick fix that we haven't applied yet. We need to > review it, and if it's good enough, this will make it to the next > release. The quick fix is now applied and tested. To be available in version 2.10.16. Alex ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error Adding Brushes
On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 8:16 PM Dr. Jason Amerson wrote: > > I am trying to add some Photoshop brushes to GIMP. Most added just fine, but > a couple did not. I am getting the following errors: > I downloaded the brushes from I am not sure if there is anything to be done, > but I am just asking just in case this can be fixed. Supporting more file format versions of ABR is a known feature request. We have a quick fix that we haven't applied yet. We need to review it, and if it's good enough, this will make it to the next release. Meanwhile, you can use a Windows program called abrMate to convert to an old version of the file format. Alex ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Error Adding Brushes
I am trying to add some Photoshop brushes to GIMP. Most added just fine, but a couple did not. I am getting the following errors: Failed to Load Data: Error loading '/home/username/.config/GIMP/2.10/brushes/concept.abr': Unable to decode abr format version 10. Failed to Load Data: Error loading '/home/username/.config/GIMP/2.10/brushes/megapack.abr': Unable to decode abr format version 10. These brushes worked fine on my computer when I was running Windows. But now that I am running Linux, I am getting these two errors. I also did this on my other Linux computers and got the same results. I downloaded the brushes from I am not sure if there is anything to be done, but I am just asking just in case this can be fixed. Jason ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] error
cant see files in app data ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] error
When installing 2.10 12, , trying to see the files in app data, have tried the newest version with no success ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Error - shuting sown
>Hello everyone >my Gimp shuts down after i click on File - New, >and also when i click "Export as" >you know this problem? >what shoul i do? >thank you very much Hello to you Help us to help you with this question, Windows which one ? or Linux stable or rolling , software from repo or self compiled, need far more info than just some vague outline, someone has to either have had the experience of same problem or be able to reproduce in order to help you, relax and give details and the answers might be found if not here then go to the operating system's forum with also more details than first post, it's OK take a deep breath. All the best -- fa-flyingalone (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Error - shuting sown
Hello everyone my Gimp shuts down after i click on File - New, and also when i click "Export as" you know this problem? what shoul i do? thank you very much -- Yuval (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] error gimp.exe
He instalado muchas veces gimp 10 en Windows 10, 64b, y no consigo abrirlo. Me sale error: unhandled exception gimp.exe. No se como solucionar el problema, con gimp 2.8 funcionaba bien hasta que lo desinstale y ya no he conseguido poder utilizarlo. gracias -- GLORIA (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error with plug-in Advanced Tone Mapping
On 07/26/2018 06:05:50 PM, Gerald Brosseau wrote: I have always the same error with the Advanced Tone Mapping on large image ! (14903 x 5239 last attemp image size @ 300dpi) Erreur lors de l’exécution de script-fu-advanced-tone-mapping : Error: Procedure execution of plug-in-gauss failed on invalid input arguments: La procédure « plug-in-gauss » a été appelée avec la valeur « 906,39 » pour le paramètre « horizontal » (#4, type gdouble). Cette valeur est hors-limite. Any hint to correct this problem? If one looks at advancedtonemapping.scm it invokes Gimp's internal procedure plug-in-gauss which has limit of 500 for the blur radius. I think, 500 is quite a lot. But advancedtonemapping calls it with a blur radius of blurAmmount*(width+height)/200 When you invoke advancedtonemapping from within Gimp the first entry is Gauss. Blur (% of img size): Unfortunately, the default value is 10, the minimum you can enter is 1. and with your image you have width = 14903 height= 5239 which gives blur_radius = blurAmmount * 20142/200 which is approximately blurAmmount*101 So, to meat the restriction imposed by plug-in-gauss you have to set the blurAmmount to 4, at most. If you need more fine grained control, you'd have to modify the file advancedtonemapping.scm, e.g. by replacing the line (car (gimp-drawable-height theLayer))) 200 by (car (gimp-drawable-height theLayer))) 2000 and SF-ADJUSTMENT _"Gauss. Blur (% of img size)" '(10 1 100 1 10 0 0) by SF-ADJUSTMENT _"Gauss. Blur (%o of img size)" '(10 1 100 1 10 0 0) i.e. the entry is taken as parts per thousand. Helmut ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error with plug-in Advanced Tone Mapping
Thanks but no help with the patch ... $ patch -b /home/gb1804lts/.config/GIMP/2.10/scripts/advancedtonemapping.scm.orig /home/gb1804lts/patch_advanced-tone-mapping.scm patching file /home/gb1804lts/.config/GIMP/2.10/scripts/advancedtonemapping.scm.orig Hunk #1 FAILED at 45. Hunk #2 FAILED at 73. Hunk #3 FAILED at 108. 3 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file /home/gb1804lts/.config/GIMP/2.10/scripts/advancedtonemapping.scm.orig.rej Le 2018-07-26 à 13:47, Helmut Jarausch a écrit : On 07/26/2018 06:05:50 PM, Gerald Brosseau wrote: I have always the same error with the Advanced Tone Mapping on large image ! (14903 x 5239 last attemp image size @ 300dpi) Erreur lors de l’exécution de script-fu-advanced-tone-mapping : Error: Procedure execution of plug-in-gauss failed on invalid input arguments: La procédure « plug-in-gauss » a été appelée avec la valeur « 906,39 » pour le paramètre « horizontal » (#4, type gdouble). Cette valeur est hors-limite. Any hint to correct this problem? Try to apply the following patch --- advancedtonemapping.scm.ORIG 2018-07-26 19:44:43.970031861 +0200 +++ advancedtonemapping.scm 2017-12-17 16:28:38.0 +0100 @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ (define (my-duplicate-layer image layer) (let* ((dup-layer (car (gimp-layer-copy layer 1 - (gimp-image-add-layer image dup-layer 0) + (gimp-image-insert-layer image dup-layer 0 0) dup-layer)) (define (script-fu-advanced-tone-mapping @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ ) ;Apply the desaturate and invert to the top layer - (gimp-desaturate copy3) + (gimp-drawable-desaturate copy3 0) (gimp-invert copy3) ;Apply the blur with the supplied blur amount (in percents!) @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ ;Merge the last layer down (let ((final (car (gimp-image-merge-down theImage merged 0 ;Name the layer so that we can see the parameters in its name - (gimp-drawable-set-name final + (gimp-item-set-name final (string-append "tmapd: g " (number->string blurAmount) With this it works on my Gimp-2.10.5 (GIT) Helmut -- Gérald Brosseau La Photo Du Jour (www.gb-photodujour.com) Sur internet depuis 1998 ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error with plug-in Advanced Tone Mapping
On 07/26/2018 06:05:50 PM, Gerald Brosseau wrote: I have always the same error with the Advanced Tone Mapping on large image ! (14903 x 5239 last attemp image size @ 300dpi) Erreur lors de l’exécution de script-fu-advanced-tone-mapping : Error: Procedure execution of plug-in-gauss failed on invalid input arguments: La procédure « plug-in-gauss » a été appelée avec la valeur « 906,39 » pour le paramètre « horizontal » (#4, type gdouble). Cette valeur est hors-limite. Any hint to correct this problem? Try to apply the following patch --- advancedtonemapping.scm.ORIG 2018-07-26 19:44:43.970031861 +0200 +++ advancedtonemapping.scm 2017-12-17 16:28:38.0 +0100 @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ (define (my-duplicate-layer image layer) (let* ((dup-layer (car (gimp-layer-copy layer 1 - (gimp-image-add-layer image dup-layer 0) + (gimp-image-insert-layer image dup-layer 0 0) dup-layer)) (define (script-fu-advanced-tone-mapping @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ ) ;Apply the desaturate and invert to the top layer - (gimp-desaturate copy3) + (gimp-drawable-desaturate copy3 0) (gimp-invert copy3) ;Apply the blur with the supplied blur amount (in percents!) @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ ;Merge the last layer down (let ((final (car (gimp-image-merge-down theImage merged 0 ;Name the layer so that we can see the parameters in its name - (gimp-drawable-set-name final + (gimp-item-set-name final (string-append "tmapd: g " (number->string blurAmount) With this it works on my Gimp-2.10.5 (GIT) Helmut ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Error with plug-in Advanced Tone Mapping
I have always the same error with the Advanced Tone Mapping on large image ! (14903 x 5239 last attemp image size @ 300dpi) Erreur lors de l’exécution de script-fu-advanced-tone-mapping : Error: Procedure execution of plug-in-gauss failed on invalid input arguments: La procédure « plug-in-gauss » a été appelée avec la valeur « 906,39 » pour le paramètre « horizontal » (#4, type gdouble). Cette valeur est hors-limite. Any hint to correct this problem? Gimp 2.10.4 Kubuntu 18.04 With 32g RAM -- Gérald Brosseau La Photo Du Jour (www.gb-photodujour.com) Sur internet depuis 1998 ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error message
The list strips out attachments. Could you host the image somewhere and give us a link to see what your error is? On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 3:29 AM Barry Edwards via gimp-user-list < gimp-user-list@gnome.org> wrote: > I get the following error when trying to "heal" an area. > > > > How do I resolve it - any ideas? > > > > Barry > > > > ___ > gimp-user-list mailing list > List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org > List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list > List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list > -- https://patdavid.net GPG: 66D1 7CA6 8088 4874 946D 18BD 67C7 6219 89E9 57AC ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Error message
I get the following error when trying to "heal" an area. How do I resolve it - any ideas? Barry ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] error (0*c0000005)
On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 14:58:53 +0200, N_H wrote: > Hello. I recently installed the new GIMP (2.10.2), when it launches the error > (0 > * c005), while in the previous version (2.8.22), I had no problem. What's > the solution? Thank you. I get if you guide me. Go to C:\Program Files\GIMP 2\lib\gimp\2.0\plug-ins and delete all .debug files - that'll make the errors go away. -- < Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://eternallybored.org/ > ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] error (0*c0000005)
Hello. I recently installed the new GIMP (2.10.2), when it launches the error (0 * c005), while in the previous version (2.8.22), I had no problem. What's the solution? Thank you. I get if you guide me. Attachments: * http://www.gimpusers.com/system/attachments/953/original/untitled.png -- N_H (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error message when running GIMP
On 01/18/2018 12:55 PM, Kevin Cozens wrote: On 2018-01-17 04:54 PM, Frank McCormick wrote: I've noticed lately a string of error messages everytime I start GIMP. [snip] (gimp:24972): LibGimpBase-WARNING **: gimp: gimp_wire_read(): error GIMP-Error: Plug-in "script-fu" (/usr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/script-fu) attempted to register the menu item "/File/Create/FX-Foundry/Logos" for procedure "script-fu-blood-logo". The menu label given in gimp_install_procedure() already contained a path. To make this work, pass just the menu's label to gimp_install_procedure(). You have some old Script-Fu scripts in your installation of GIMP. The script-fu-register block should only provide the name of the script and the menu entry used to run the script. Where the menu entry is to appear (ie. the path to it) is given in a script-fu-menu-register block. That was the problem. The scripts were from 2006-2007 for a much older version of GIMP. Didn't use any very much anyway. Thanks ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error message when running GIMP
On 2018-01-17 04:54 PM, Frank McCormick wrote: I've noticed lately a string of error messages everytime I start GIMP. [snip] (gimp:24972): LibGimpBase-WARNING **: gimp: gimp_wire_read(): error GIMP-Error: Plug-in "script-fu" (/usr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/script-fu) attempted to register the menu item "/File/Create/FX-Foundry/Logos" for procedure "script-fu-blood-logo". The menu label given in gimp_install_procedure() already contained a path. To make this work, pass just the menu's label to gimp_install_procedure(). You have some old Script-Fu scripts in your installation of GIMP. The script-fu-register block should only provide the name of the script and the menu entry used to run the script. Where the menu entry is to appear (ie. the path to it) is given in a script-fu-menu-register block. -- Cheers! Kevin. http://www.ve3syb.ca/ |"Nerds make the shiny things that distract Owner of Elecraft K2 #2172 | the mouth-breathers, and that's why we're | powerful!" #include | --Chris Hardwick ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Error message when running GIMP
I've noticed lately a string of error messages everytime I start GIMP. Here's just 2 of them...my .xsession-errors log has about 30 of them. (gimp:24972): LibGimpBase-WARNING **: gimp: gimp_wire_read(): error GIMP-Error: Plug-in "script-fu" (/usr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/script-fu) attempted to register the menu item "/File/Create/FX-Foundry/Logos" for procedure "script-fu-blood-logo". The menu label given in gimp_install_procedure() already contained a path. To make this work, pass just the menu's label to gimp_install_procedure(). GIMP-Error: Plug-in "script-fu" (/usr/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/script-fu) attempted to register the menu item "/File/Create/FX-Foundry/Logos/" for procedure "script-fu-fiery-steel". The menu label given in gimp_install_procedure() already contained a path. To make this work, pass just the menu's label to gimp_install_procedure(). It seems the errors don't affect anything. Everything still works in GIMP ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error in opening psd files
24 сент. 2016 г. 0:37 пользователь "Steve Kinney" написал: > The GIMP includes a filter that converts the visible image to CMYK > layers, and the result can be exported as a CMYK TIFF file. Only if one installs a 3rd party plugin called separate+. Alex ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Error in opening psd files
>No longer have a copy of Photoshop—I just remember the manual talking >about it, and that they seemed to have several different color >standards available. > >Sorry my memory of it is no better. It was at least two decades ago >that I last had to deal much with different color standards. Steve >Kinney posted that PS uses LAB, which fits my memories, but I seem to >recall there were one or two others available, at least for printing. > >And regardless of whether you use RGB or LAB, printing will be CYMK. >IIRC (and I may not) LAB is closer to CYMK. > >Ross Hi, but in GIMP how is possible to export in CYMK before printing? Thank you!! -- enzoorsi (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error in opening psd files
On 09/23/2016 11:57 AM, Ross Martinek wrote: > Thanks for jogging my memory. I think what I was thinking is that Adobe had > color palettes based on those catalogs, intended to produce printed colors > that matched the catalog. Like I said, it’s been a long time. Those catalogs would be Pantone ones. They are usually most relevant when printing vector graphics, i.e. silk screen or offset printing. Printer's inks have Pantone values printed on their labels, and very precisely match the color chips on Pantone reference cards. I have seen "Pantone to HTML color" charts on the network, and they are better than nothing but far from precise. "HTML color" means hexadecimal RGB, which is also the GIMP's native color model. RGB stands for Red, Green and Blue. It is an "additive" color model, applicable to mixing colored light sources. Example: TV screens and computer monitors. LAB stands for Luminance, Red/Green, Blue/Yellow. It is based on studies of human color perception and is more or less universal, but no monitor or printer can duplicate this color space directly - it has to be exported to RGB (monitor) or CMYK (printer) for display. CMYK stands for Cyan, Magenta, Yellow and Black. It is a "subtractive" color model, applicable to mixing ink or paint colors to control the color of reflected light. When people start talking about computer programs that can "natively edit in CMYK", try not to groan: The only way to edit images in CMYK is with a paintbrush or comparable tool, because on a monitor you see the image in RGB no matter what format the program is reading from and writing to. An RGB image can be exported to or imported from a file with CMYK data, via a filter based on the intersection of RGB and CMYK values in LAB color space. But "what you see" on the monitor is not exactly "what you get" on the printed page. Upcoming versions of the GIMP with GEGL under the hood will support /much/ higher resolution RGB color, improving the potential color match between screen and paper versions of a given image. (GIMP layers can also include an Alpha channel for transparency; hence "RGBA" values.) In recent times I have had no problems with color management for print; PNG files imported to Scribus and saved as PDF come out looking like I want them to when printed. A decade ago, this was not always the case. I believe that LCD monitors and improvements in color conversion algorithms probably account for this. To get the best available color rendering, first check your monitor. If a color profile is available from the manufacturer, get it and install it on your workstation machine, and make sure the GIMP knows about it: Edit > Preferences > Color Management. This will tweak your video output for "best results." An alternative to this is to glovally disable color management and tweak your monitor by hand, see: http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/ Color perception is also a factor: The more neutral gray you see around an image, the less your eye and brain will distort the colors in the image. Conversely, if you know that a bunch of images you are working on will be displayed on a colored background - say a web page or brochure - you can set the Canvas Padding color in the GIMP to that color, and see your images in progress in their native color context: Edit > Preferences > Image Windows > Appearance. The GIMP includes a filter that converts the visible image to CMYK layers, and the result can be exported as a CMYK TIFF file. This may facilitate color adjustment at the print shop, and any commercial printers who still demand "Adobe Formats Only, or take your filthy money elsewhere!" will usually accept CMYK TIFF files without complaint. Color printing used to be a bit of a major nuisance, but lately not so much - depending the use case, your mileage may vary. The remaining problem is color resolution: If you have a big, subtle gradient you have to get just exactly right, you are going to see banding on your monitor and in the printed results. The upcoming GEGL based GIMP color model, with resolutions up to 64 bit floating point, should put a stop to that nonsense. :o) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error in opening psd files
Thanks for jogging my memory. I think what I was thinking is that Adobe had color palettes based on those catalogs, intended to produce printed colors that matched the catalog. Like I said, it’s been a long time. Ross > On Sep 23, 2016, at 10:21 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine > wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Ross Martinek wrote: > >> Sorry my memory of it is no better. It was at least two decades ago >> that I last had to deal much with different color standards. Steve Kinney >> posted that PS uses LAB, which fits my memories, but I seem to recall >> there were one or two others available, at least for printing. > > You were probably referring to Pantone and Hexachrome. None of those > spot color catalogs are related to Adobe. None of them are color > models :) > > Alex > ___ > gimp-user-list mailing list > List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org > List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list > List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error in opening psd files
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Ross Martinek wrote: > Sorry my memory of it is no better. It was at least two decades ago > that I last had to deal much with different color standards. Steve Kinney > posted that PS uses LAB, which fits my memories, but I seem to recall > there were one or two others available, at least for printing. You were probably referring to Pantone and Hexachrome. None of those spot color catalogs are related to Adobe. None of them are color models :) Alex ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error in opening psd files
No longer have a copy of Photoshop—I just remember the manual talking about it, and that they seemed to have several different color standards available. Sorry my memory of it is no better. It was at least two decades ago that I last had to deal much with different color standards. Steve Kinney posted that PS uses LAB, which fits my memories, but I seem to recall there were one or two others available, at least for printing. And regardless of whether you use RGB or LAB, printing will be CYMK. IIRC (and I may not) LAB is closer to CYMK. Ross > On Sep 23, 2016, at 4:03 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine > wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 2:01 AM, Ross Martinek wrote: >> PS has a number of different color standards (some Adobe’s proprietary >> materials) > > Any examples? > > Alex > ___ > gimp-user-list mailing list > List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org > List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list > List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error in opening psd files
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 5:03 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine < alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 2:01 AM, Ross Martinek wrote: > > PS has a number of different color standards (some Adobe’s proprietary > materials) > > Any examples? > > Alex > > What's a color standard? Do you mean ICC profiles? What's proprietary material here? ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error in opening psd files
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 2:01 AM, Ross Martinek wrote: > PS has a number of different color standards (some Adobe’s proprietary > materials) Any examples? Alex ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error in opening psd files
On 09/19/2016 04:48 PM, enzoorsi wrote: > But now in GIMP the colors seem different from Photoshop when I am exporting > in > PNG/JPEG :( > The GIMP and Photoshop use different color models: RBG in the GIMP and LAB (if I recall correctly) in Photoshop. Color conversions between the two will be, at best, approximate. :o/ ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error in opening psd files
PS has a number of different color standards (some Adobe’s proprietary materials) that it can use in addition to the standard variations of HSI, RGB, and CYMK. I’m not sure how GIMP handles this, as it hasn’t come up in what I’m doing. When you export the files from PSD, make sure you are using a color space that is supported by GIMP. Ross > On Sep 19, 2016, at 3:48 PM, enzoorsi wrote: > >> I think the clipping mask is the problem. Can you go back into PS and >> remove the clipping mask in the original file? That might solve the >> problem. >> >> Other than that, I’m at a loss. Hopefully one of the real gurus will >> chime in on this. >> >> Ross > > Thank you very much!! It worked!! > > But now in GIMP the colors seem different from Photoshop when I am exporting > in > PNG/JPEG :( > > -- > enzoorsi (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) > ___ > gimp-user-list mailing list > List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org > List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list > List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Error in opening psd files
>I think the clipping mask is the problem. Can you go back into PS and >remove the clipping mask in the original file? That might solve the >problem. > >Other than that, I’m at a loss. Hopefully one of the real gurus will >chime in on this. > >Ross Thank you very much!! It worked!! But now in GIMP the colors seem different from Photoshop when I am exporting in PNG/JPEG :( -- enzoorsi (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error in opening psd files
I think the clipping mask is the problem. Can you go back into PS and remove the clipping mask in the original file? That might solve the problem. Other than that, I’m at a loss. Hopefully one of the real gurus will chime in on this. Ross > On Sep 19, 2016, at 3:29 AM, enzoorsi wrote: > >> Did you use the “Open as layers” command? GIMP will open a psd file >> with the simple “Open” command but this may result in the error >> message you get. >> >> I had a similar problem when converting from PS to GIMP, but I seem to >> recall using this command solved it. >> >> Ross > > Unfortunately even with "Open layers" I get that error :( > The file has been produced with Photoshop, I can open with Gimp but layers are > wrongly shown. > I saw that the problem is with those layers on which in Photoshop has been > created a "clipping mask"... > Any idea? :( > > -- > enzoorsi (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) > ___ > gimp-user-list mailing list > List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org > List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list > List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Error in opening psd files
>Unfortunately even with "Open layers" I get that error :( >The file has been produced with Photoshop, I can open with Gimp but >layers are wrongly shown. >I saw that the problem is with those layers on which in Photoshop has >been created a "clipping mask"... >Any idea? :( Another (even worse) problem: PSD colors seems different from the same file opened in Photoshop and in GIMP... Any idea?? :O -- enzoorsi (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Error in opening psd files
>Did you use the “Open as layers” command? GIMP will open a psd file >with the simple “Open” command but this may result in the error >message you get. > >I had a similar problem when converting from PS to GIMP, but I seem to >recall using this command solved it. > >Ross Unfortunately even with "Open layers" I get that error :( The file has been produced with Photoshop, I can open with Gimp but layers are wrongly shown. I saw that the problem is with those layers on which in Photoshop has been created a "clipping mask"... Any idea? :( -- enzoorsi (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error in opening psd files
Did you use the “Open as layers” command? GIMP will open a psd file with the simple “Open” command but this may result in the error message you get. I had a similar problem when converting from PS to GIMP, but I seem to recall using this command solved it. Ross > On Sep 18, 2016, at 4:20 PM, enzoorsi wrote: > >> Hi, >> Sorry if the topic is obvious but i could not find any answer: >> On opening psd files with gimp, i always get the error "the layer mask >> is partly outside the layer boundary.The mask Will be cropped which >> may in data loss." , which results in losing one or several layers. Is >> there a way to fix this ? > > Hi, > I am having the same trouble...no idea how to open it properly in GIMP due to > this error :( > Did you solve it somehow? > > Thank you!! > > -- > enzoorsi (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) > ___ > gimp-user-list mailing list > List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org > List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list > List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Error in opening psd files
>Hi, >Sorry if the topic is obvious but i could not find any answer: >On opening psd files with gimp, i always get the error "the layer mask >is partly outside the layer boundary.The mask Will be cropped which >may in data loss." , which results in losing one or several layers. Is >there a way to fix this ? Hi, I am having the same trouble...no idea how to open it properly in GIMP due to this error :( Did you solve it somehow? Thank you!! -- enzoorsi (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Error while executing script-fu-smart-remove
>Hi. > >I 'm using Gimp 2.8.18 and when i try to use the Heal selection filter >appears the next message: > >Error while executing script-fu-smart-remove >Error: eval: unbound variable: plug-in synthesizer > >I've searched a lot and I don't still find the solution. > No replies? Try This error? http://imgur.com/a/fsaFq so assuming OS = Windows of some sort Two issues. 1. You do not have the resynthesizer plugin installed. 2. You are using an outdated script. A more recent python plugin will work better. I did bundle everything one time. Get http://www.mediafire.com/download/gwc928wmwti30g3/resynth_win_32_64.zip unzip and put 3 files, plugin-heal-selection.py, resynthesizer.exe, resynthesizer-gui.exe into .gimp-2.8\plug-ins. Choose the appropriate 32/64 bit versions. Remove the old smart-remove.scm file to prevent conflicts. -- rich2005 (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error while executing script-fu-smart-remove
On 16-08-03 08:36 PM, GGmp wrote: > I 'm using Gimp 2.8.18 and when i try to use the Heal selection filter appears > the next message: > > Error while executing script-fu-smart-remove > Error: eval: unbound variable: plug-in synthesizer If you had done a search using the words "gimp unbound variable" you would have found the solution on the page https://www.gimp.org/docs/script-fu-update.html You have an old script that is using a variable before it was defined. Make sure your variables are defined before you use them. -- Cheers! Kevin. http://www.ve3syb.ca/ |"Nerds make the shiny things that distract Owner of Elecraft K2 #2172 | the mouth-breathers, and that's why we're | powerful!" #include | --Chris Hardwick ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error while executing script-fu-smart-remove
Hi! This filter requires that the Resynthesizer plugin is installed. This is not a plugin that is maintained by the GIMP developers: https://github.com/bootchk/resynthesizer If you need inpainting you could also try one of the methods available in G'MIC as well (http://gmic.eu) On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 1:36 PM GGmp wrote: > Hi. > > I 'm using Gimp 2.8.18 and when i try to use the Heal selection filter > appears > the next message: > > Error while executing script-fu-smart-remove > Error: eval: unbound variable: plug-in synthesizer > > I've searched a lot and I don't still find the solution. > > Regards. > > > > -- > GGmp (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) > ___ > gimp-user-list mailing list > List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org > List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list > List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list > -- Pat David https://pixls.us http://blog.patdavid.net ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Error while executing script-fu-smart-remove
Hi. I 'm using Gimp 2.8.18 and when i try to use the Heal selection filter appears the next message: Error while executing script-fu-smart-remove Error: eval: unbound variable: plug-in synthesizer I've searched a lot and I don't still find the solution. Regards. -- GGmp (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Error in opening psd files
Hi, Sorry if the topic is obvious but i could not find any answer: On opening psd files with gimp, i always get the error "the layer mask is partly outside the layer boundary.The mask Will be cropped which may in data loss." , which results in losing one or several layers. Is there a way to fix this ? -- Ender (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error message
Hi, posting images on the mailing list doesn't work. Could you please type the text of the message here? Kind regards Sven ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Error message
This message appears each time I m open GIMP. Could somebody please tell me what it means and what I should do about it (if anything). [image: Inline images 1] Sailorman ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error.
Considering you said GIMP's been working up until today, I assume you upgraded to 2.8.8, right? If so, it could just be a bug that made its way into the stable release. You could just go back to 2.8.6 until the issue is resolved. Other than that, I'm not really sure what could be going wrong. Maybe reinstall the Microsoft Visual C++ Redistributable Package? Best of luck! Sent from my iPod On Nov 3, 2013, at 9:38 PM, jessessessica wrote: >> All right, so. I've had GIMP ever since the latest version came out, >> and it hasn't been up to this very day that it's given me an error >> when loading, ad it's never happened before. Ever. It's some crud >> that tells me "Runtime/C++ Error" and that it needs to terminate. >> So... what the heck do I do? Am I not going to be able to use GIMP >> anymore? .__. > > I'm having the same issue and I've tried cleaning my pc, deleting a LOT of my > art, re-installing the program, pretty much any "answer" I've seen. I have > Windows 7...I just want my gimp back :( > > Attachments: > * http://www.gimpusers.com/system/attachments/77/original/Gimp_Not_Working.bmp > > -- > jessessessica (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) > ___ > gimp-user-list mailing list > List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org > List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Error.
>All right, so. I've had GIMP ever since the latest version came out, >and it hasn't been up to this very day that it's given me an error >when loading, ad it's never happened before. Ever. It's some crud >that tells me "Runtime/C++ Error" and that it needs to terminate. >So... what the heck do I do? Am I not going to be able to use GIMP >anymore? .__. I'm having the same issue and I've tried cleaning my pc, deleting a LOT of my art, re-installing the program, pretty much any "answer" I've seen. I have Windows 7...I just want my gimp back :( Attachments: * http://www.gimpusers.com/system/attachments/77/original/Gimp_Not_Working.bmp -- jessessessica (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error on run Deskew plugin from Python-Fu
Hi Joao, thank you for reply. In my previous message I already wrote the error shown up in the console: Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in RuntimeError: calling error I still cannot figure out how to make it work. Any idea? Thankyou - Original Message - From: Joao S. O. Bueno To: Ramon Valdez Cc: "gimp-user-list@gnome.org" Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 4:37 PM Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] Error on run Deskew plugin from Python-Fu Hi Ramon - If you add any error mesage that show up in the console when you make this call, it would help you, and others to understand what is going on. Otherwise, since the plug-in is not part of GIMP itself, if you have no further anser here, you might try to contact the plug-in author directly. On 28 August 2013 07:02, Ramon Valdez wrote: > I would like to run the (great!) Deskew plugin from the Python-Fu console, > info: http://registry.gimp.org/node/2958 > I'm a very GIMP Python-Fu beginner, so i followed what user "asperge" did in > the post shown above (tested-working Script-Fu batch version): > get the image (active image), get the drawable (active layer) and finally run > plugin "deskew_plugin". > I put deskew.exe in the GIMP plugin folder, i opened GIMP, i loaded an image, > then in the Python-Fu console i wrote: > > image=gimp.image_list()[0] > drawable=image.active_layer > pdb.gimp_deskew_plugin(image, drawable, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) > > I get this error: > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "", line 1, in > RuntimeError: calling error > > The working Script-Fu calling was: > (gimp-deskew-plugin 0 image drawable 0 0 0 0 0) > The only difference from the asperge's Script-Fu working version is that in > my Phyton version there's no "0" before "image". > I guess it's the "run mode" parameter. If i try to insert it, i have an > error for too much parameters: > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "", line 1, in > TypeError: wrong number of parameters > > I would really appreciate any help. > Thankyou! > (Windows 8 64 bit, GIMP 2.8.6) > ___ > gimp-user-list mailing list > List address: gimp-user-list@gnome.org > List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error on run Deskew plugin from Python-Fu
Hi Ramon - If you add any error mesage that show up in the console when you make this call, it would help you, and others to understand what is going on. Otherwise, since the plug-in is not part of GIMP itself, if you have no further anser here, you might try to contact the plug-in author directly. On 28 August 2013 07:02, Ramon Valdez wrote: > I would like to run the (great!) Deskew plugin from the Python-Fu console, > info: http://registry.gimp.org/node/2958 > I'm a very GIMP Python-Fu beginner, so i followed what user "asperge" did in > the post shown above (tested-working Script-Fu batch version): > get the image (active image), get the drawable (active layer) and finally run > plugin "deskew_plugin". > I put deskew.exe in the GIMP plugin folder, i opened GIMP, i loaded an image, > then in the Python-Fu console i wrote: > > image=gimp.image_list()[0] > drawable=image.active_layer > pdb.gimp_deskew_plugin(image, drawable, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) > > I get this error: > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "", line 1, in > RuntimeError: calling error > > The working Script-Fu calling was: > (gimp-deskew-plugin 0 image drawable 0 0 0 0 0) > The only difference from the asperge's Script-Fu working version is that in > my Phyton version there's no "0" before "image". > I guess it's the "run mode" parameter. If i try to insert it, i have an > error for too much parameters: > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "", line 1, in > TypeError: wrong number of parameters > > I would really appreciate any help. > Thankyou! > (Windows 8 64 bit, GIMP 2.8.6) > ___ > gimp-user-list mailing list > List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org > List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Error on run Deskew plugin from Python-Fu
I would like to run the (great!) Deskew plugin from the Python-Fu console, info: http://registry.gimp.org/node/2958 I'm a very GIMP Python-Fu beginner, so i followed what user "asperge" did in the post shown above (tested-working Script-Fu batch version): get the image (active image), get the drawable (active layer) and finally run plugin "deskew_plugin". I put deskew.exe in the GIMP plugin folder, i opened GIMP, i loaded an image, then in the Python-Fu console i wrote: image=gimp.image_list()[0] drawable=image.active_layer pdb.gimp_deskew_plugin(image, drawable, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) I get this error: Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in RuntimeError: calling error The working Script-Fu calling was: (gimp-deskew-plugin 0 image drawable 0 0 0 0 0) The only difference from the asperge's Script-Fu working version is that in my Phyton version there's no "0" before "image". I guess it's the "run mode" parameter. If i try to insert it, i have an error for too much parameters: Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in TypeError: wrong number of parameters I would really appreciate any help. Thankyou! (Windows 8 64 bit, GIMP 2.8.6) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] error animated Gif
> The animated gif is fine... Windows Explorer is the problem, it does not allow > to project an animated gif when it is showed resized, rescaled etc. and of > course i tested the gif in Windows Exploer, after tips of you i tried the > animated gif in Google chrome, and there was no problem —- ... more good reason, to quit windows-ing.. I like it.. :D ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] error animated Gif
Problem solved..! The animated gif is fine... Windows Explorer is the problem, it does not allow to project an animated gif when it is showed resized, rescaled etc. and of course i tested the gif in Windows Exploer, after tips of you i tried the animated gif in Google chrome, and there was no problem then i found a site where my problem was mentioned. So when i resized my gif in gimp and put it on my website (in original sizes) there were no black lines anymore... I am very happy now thanks for all your help, i have now a small , working animated gif. Fred.. Attachments: * http://www.gimpusers.com/system/attachments/53/original/error_in_gif.jpg -- fvn18 (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] error animated Gif
On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 08:57:20 +0100, Greg Chapman wrote: > (I do still use Windows and) I agree that it is a bug in IE10. The gif > renders fine in IrfanView and all other browsers I have installed. Don't judge the GIF quality with IrfanView, because it's actually quite buggy when displaying animated GIFs. -- < Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://eternallybored.org/ > ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] error animated Gif
On 07/04/13 02:57, Greg Chapman wrote: Hi, On 04 Jul 13 00:51 Ofnuts said: i just noticed it did not happens in google chrome but the same gif shows the black lines in windows explorer 10 strange, and ofcourse i always openend the animated gif in explorer hihi, can you try it in explorer 10 if possible ? Sorry, I quit Windows-ing several years ago, and it did a lot more good to my health than quitting smoking :) Now, what kind of additional evidence do you need to start thinking that perhaps this supercalifragilisticexpialidocious Microsoft piece of software of yours could have a bug? (I do still use Windows and) I agree that it is a bug in IE10. The gif renders fine in IrfanView and all other browsers I have installed. Greg Chapman http://www.gregtutor.plus.com Helping new users of KompoZer and The GIMP ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list I haven't seen the modified GIF, but the original had the lines on FF 20 on FreeBSD 9.1 -- Yours in Christ, Joseph A Nagy Jr "Whoever loves instruction loves knowledge, But he who hates correction is stupid." -- Proverbs 12:1 Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. Original content CopyFree (F) under the OWL http://copyfree.org/licenses/owl/license.txt ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] error animated Gif
Hi, On 04 Jul 13 00:51 Ofnuts said: > > i just noticed it did not happens in google chrome but the same > > gif shows the black lines in windows explorer 10 strange, and > > ofcourse i always openend the animated gif in explorer hihi, can > > you try it in explorer 10 if possible ? > > Sorry, I quit Windows-ing several years ago, and it did a lot more > good to my health than quitting smoking :) > > Now, what kind of additional evidence do you need to start thinking > that perhaps this supercalifragilisticexpialidocious Microsoft piece > of software of yours could have a bug? (I do still use Windows and) I agree that it is a bug in IE10. The gif renders fine in IrfanView and all other browsers I have installed. Greg Chapman http://www.gregtutor.plus.com Helping new users of KompoZer and The GIMP ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] error animated Gif
On 07/04/2013 01:03 AM, fvn18 wrote: Plenty of images... except an XCF that would look like the source of an animated GIF? But I don't see anything technically wrong with "animation optimize difference.gif", in particular I can't see the "shadows" in your screenshot (tries with Firefox and Gwenview, besides Gimp) i just noticed it did not happens in google chrome but the same gif shows the black lines in windows explorer 10 strange, and ofcourse i always openend the animated gif in explorer hihi, can you try it in explorer 10 if possible ? Sorry, I quit Windows-ing several years ago, and it did a lot more good to my health than quitting smoking :) Now, what kind of additional evidence do you need to start thinking that perhaps this supercalifragilisticexpialidocious Microsoft piece of software of yours could have a bug? ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] error animated Gif
>Plenty of images... except an XCF that would look like the source of >an >animated GIF? > >But I don't see anything technically wrong with "animation optimize >difference.gif", in particular I can't see the "shadows" in your >screenshot (tries with Firefox and Gwenview, besides Gimp) i just noticed it did not happens in google chrome but the same gif shows the black lines in windows explorer 10 strange, and ofcourse i always openend the animated gif in explorer hihi, can you try it in explorer 10 if possible ? Attachments: * http://www.gimpusers.com/system/attachments/52/original/error_in_gif.gif -- fvn18 (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] error animated Gif
On 07/03/2013 04:47 PM, fvn18 wrote: Can you post the full GIF (and possibly the original XCF) somewhere? i put the files online see the url. i posted under this message Attachments: * http://www.gimpusers.com/system/attachments/51/original/error_in_gif.gif Plenty of images... except an XCF that would look like the source of an animated GIF? But I don't see anything technically wrong with "animation optimize difference.gif", in particular I can't see the "shadows" in your screenshot (tries with Firefox and Gwenview, besides Gimp) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] error animated Gif
>Can you post the full GIF (and possibly the original XCF) somewhere? i put the files online see the url. i posted under this message Attachments: * http://www.gimpusers.com/system/attachments/51/original/error_in_gif.gif -- fvn18 (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] error animated Gif
>Can you post the full GIF (and possibly the original XCF) somewhere? https://www.wetransfer.com/downloads/933ec84ad96ba4419751d98275509b6f20130702220436/7b3e5cfbda148b4aa156cbb81fe9302c20130702220436/f52d06 Attachments: * http://www.gimpusers.com/system/attachments/50/original/error_in_gif.gif -- fvn18 (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] error animated Gif
>How about converting to indexed color mode before you try optimizing >it? > >When done right, the "Optimize" command (in either flavor) should make >no visual difference in the resulting animation. > >-- Stratadrake >strata_ran...@hotmail.com > >Numbers may not lie, but neither do they tell the whole truth. gave it a try no helpthanks for the option Attachments: * http://www.gimpusers.com/system/attachments/49/original/error_in_gif.gif -- fvn18 (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] error animated Gif
put all the files online (wetransfer.com) click on the link for download https://www.wetransfer.com/downloads/933ec84ad96ba4419751d98275509b6f20130702220436/7b3e5cfbda148b4aa156cbb81fe9302c20130702220436/f52d06 Attachments: * http://www.gimpusers.com/system/attachments/47/original/error_in_gif.gif -- fvn18 (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] error animated Gif
> Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 05:55:08 +0200 > From: for...@gimpusers.com > To: gimp-user-list@gnome.org > CC: t...@gimpusers.com > Subject: [Gimp-user] error animated Gif > > Thanks for replyingyour answer did not helped for me, the problem stays. i > optimized each picture and i optimized the new (12 pictures) layer. but the > lines stays. but i understand now better the difference so thanks for that... > > Attachments: > * http://www.gimpusers.com/system/attachments/46/original/error_in_gif.gif > How about converting to indexed color mode before you try optimizing it? When done right, the "Optimize" command (in either flavor) should make no visual difference in the resulting animation. -- Stratadrake strata_ran...@hotmail.com Numbers may not lie, but neither do they tell the whole truth. ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] error animated Gif
On 02 Jul 13 07:57 Ofnuts said: > > Attachments: > > > http://www.gimpusers.com/system/attachments/46/original/error_in_gif.gif > > > Can you post the full GIF (and possibly the original XCF) somewhere? I agree we need to see the full file. I've never used GIMP for animation, so I could be very wrong, but to me this looks like poor selection technique during the process of cutting and copying the figures as they climb the escalator - and not a problem with saving the animation process as such. Greg Chapman http://www.gregtutor.plus.com Helping new users of KompoZer and The GIMP ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] error animated Gif
On 07/02/2013 05:55 AM, fvn18 wrote: Use Optimize (for GIF), not Optimize (Difference). Optimize (Difference) doesn't take into account that GIF cannot do partial transparency (and neither can Filters-Animation-Playback), so it's not really useful, unless maybe for animated PNGs. Thanks for replyingyour answer did not helped for me, the problem stays. i optimized each picture and i optimized the new (12 pictures) layer. but the lines stays. but i understand now better the difference so thanks for that... Attachments: * http://www.gimpusers.com/system/attachments/46/original/error_in_gif.gif Can you post the full GIF (and possibly the original XCF) somewhere? ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] error animated Gif
>Use Optimize (for GIF), not Optimize (Difference). Optimize >(Difference) doesn't take into account that GIF cannot do partial >transparency (and neither can Filters-Animation-Playback), so it's not >really useful, unless maybe for animated PNGs. Thanks for replyingyour answer did not helped for me, the problem stays. i optimized each picture and i optimized the new (12 pictures) layer. but the lines stays. but i understand now better the difference so thanks for that... Attachments: * http://www.gimpusers.com/system/attachments/46/original/error_in_gif.gif -- fvn18 (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] error animated Gif
>i made a animated Gif (Gimp 2.8) but there is something wrong. > >i made an escalator with 2 persons on it, they move up the stairs in >12 steps. >i made 12 different .XCF's for every step one. > >Before converting to animated gif i make the XCF's 1 layer each. >when i use the option FILTER > ANIMATION > OPTIMIZE (difference) >the animated gif leaves black lines when the persons move (see picture >attachment) the export file is very small so that's ok Use Optimize (for GIF), not Optimize (Difference). Optimize (Difference) doesn't take into account that GIF cannot do partial transparency (and neither can Filters-Animation-Playback), so it's not really useful, unless maybe for animated PNGs. -- Grue (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] error animated Gif
i made a animated Gif (Gimp 2.8) but there is something wrong. i made an escalator with 2 persons on it, they move up the stairs in 12 steps. i made 12 different .XCF's for every step one. Before converting to animated gif i make the XCF's 1 layer each. when i use the option FILTER > ANIMATION > OPTIMIZE (difference) the animated gif leaves black lines when the persons move (see picture attachment) the export file is very small so that's ok When i use FILE > EXPORT > (=export as a animated gif) with the option delete previous frame, then the animated Gif looks fine. but the size is 5x bigger than when converting the first option ( i understand why) how get rid of the black lines ?? Attachments: * http://www.gimpusers.com/system/attachments/45/original/error_in_gif.gif -- fvn18 (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error with Fedora 18 Gimp 28
On Sat, 2013-06-08 at 06:23 -0300, sergelli Ubatumirim wrote: > (gimp:2042): Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_entry_completion_get_model: > assertion `GTK_IS_ENTRY_COMPLETION (completion)' failed > > (gimp:2042): Gimp-Widgets-CRITICAL **: > gimp_container_tree_store_clear_items: assertion > `GIMP_IS_CONTAINER_TREE_STORE (store)' failed This happens because a much worse bug in GTK+ was fixed. That warning will be fixed in GIMP 2.8.6, but you can ignore it, it is completely harmless. --Mitch ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error with Fedora 18 Gimp 28
Liam R E Quin writes: > On Sat, 2013-06-08 at 06:23 -0300, sergelli Ubatumirim wrote: > > I use kernel 3.9.4-200. Fedora fc18.i686 and Gimp 2.8.4.3 from my > > distribuition repositories > > After running Gimp on the command line, a list of errors appears > > --- > > Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/50-user.conf", line 9: reading > > configurations from ~/.fonts.conf is deprecated. > > You can get rid of this error by editing /etc/fonts/conf.d/50-user.conf > and removing the depracated="yes" attributes (be careful, and test this > immediately, a syntax error in this file will make your system unhappy). Ubuntu has this problem too, and I got rid of it by moving ~/.fonts.conf to ~/.config/fontconfig/fonts.conf No need to edit a system file. ...Akkana ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error with Fedora 18 Gimp 28
On Sat, 2013-06-08 at 06:23 -0300, sergelli Ubatumirim wrote: > I use kernel 3.9.4-200. Fedora fc18.i686 and Gimp 2.8.4.3 from my > distribuition repositories > After running Gimp on the command line, a list of errors appears > --- > Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/50-user.conf", line 9: reading > configurations from ~/.fonts.conf is deprecated. You can get rid of this error by editing /etc/fonts/conf.d/50-user.conf and removing the depracated="yes" attributes (be careful, and test this immediately, a syntax error in this file will make your system unhappy). > (gimp:2042): Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_entry_completion_get_model: > assertion `GTK_IS_ENTRY_COMPLETION (completion)' failed > > (gimp:2042): Gimp-Widgets-CRITICAL **: > gimp_container_tree_store_clear_items: assertion > `GIMP_IS_CONTAINER_TREE_STORE (store)' failed > --- > Please, anyone can help ? Simplest is to ignore them unless there's some other problem. Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error with Fedora 18 Gimp 28
> I use kernel 3.9.4-200. Fedora fc18.i686 and Gimp 2.8.4.3 from my > distribuition repositories > After running Gimp on the command line, a list of errors appears > --- > Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/50-user.conf", line 9: reading > configurations from ~/.fonts.conf is deprecated. > > (gimp:2042): Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_entry_completion_get_model: > assertion `GTK_IS_ENTRY_COMPLETION (completion)' failed > > (gimp:2042): Gimp-Widgets-CRITICAL **: > gimp_container_tree_store_clear_items: assertion > `GIMP_IS_CONTAINER_TREE_STORE (store)' failed > --- Otherwise does your gimp work as expected? If so don't worry about the messages. Use the icon to start gimp and you will not see anything. -- Owen ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Error with Fedora 18 Gimp 28
I use kernel 3.9.4-200. Fedora fc18.i686 and Gimp 2.8.4.3 from my distribuition repositories After running Gimp on the command line, a list of errors appears --- Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/50-user.conf", line 9: reading configurations from ~/.fonts.conf is deprecated. (gimp:2042): Gtk-CRITICAL **: IA__gtk_entry_completion_get_model: assertion `GTK_IS_ENTRY_COMPLETION (completion)' failed (gimp:2042): Gimp-Widgets-CRITICAL **: gimp_container_tree_store_clear_items: assertion `GIMP_IS_CONTAINER_TREE_STORE (store)' failed --- Please, anyone can help ? Thanks in advance ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error
>Did you ever check the amount of storage left on the drive? >Do you have an updated antivirus software?/Infected? >Did you keep Windows updated? > >The problem with "older" computers is there's a lot of stuff on them, >over >a long period of time. Maybe it's a conflict with another program or >hardware >that used C++ and now there's a conflict with Gimp? > >Have you been able to install any other software other than Gimp >since? > >Not to be self inflating, but the thing about restoring the computer >back >to a point previous to installing Gimp was I believe the best advice. >(I have had tons of used computers over the years and a thousand such >dilemmas. Sometimes the fallback position is best.) >Or as I said getting everything you need off the drive, and running >the >factory restore discs that came with the computer? But then again, >it'll >have to all be updated. >Then again, Vista's nothing to write home about. Win 7 much better. >Search "Windows 7 upgrade" on ebay and right now there are win 7 or 8 >versions for like 30+ bucks. Seriously, I had Vista. It stunk. >But you have to look up your computer model and know whether it's >32 or 64 bit version. >Dan > >On 11/14/12, Sleepingbeautiie wrote: 'Ight. Maybe I can ask mum to get the upgrade as an early Christmas gift, hah. But yeah, I'll see what I can do, 'cause way earlier I cleared a bunch of programs off of my computer to see if it'd help with Gimp... . Then again I might just be getting my laptop fixed in time for Christmas instead. Thank goodness for Picmonkey, though. I can wait with Gimp xD Though, I just re-installed Gimp 2.8 (which I've been using for the past few months); per se, it loads fine/fast the first time, but when I have to close it/load it again it loads slower and gives me that C++ Error and stuff, so. MEH. -- Sleepingbeautiie (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error
Did you ever check the amount of storage left on the drive? Do you have an updated antivirus software?/Infected? Did you keep Windows updated? The problem with "older" computers is there's a lot of stuff on them, over a long period of time. Maybe it's a conflict with another program or hardware that used C++ and now there's a conflict with Gimp? Have you been able to install any other software other than Gimp since? Not to be self inflating, but the thing about restoring the computer back to a point previous to installing Gimp was I believe the best advice. (I have had tons of used computers over the years and a thousand such dilemmas. Sometimes the fallback position is best.) Or as I said getting everything you need off the drive, and running the factory restore discs that came with the computer? But then again, it'll have to all be updated. Then again, Vista's nothing to write home about. Win 7 much better. Search "Windows 7 upgrade" on ebay and right now there are win 7 or 8 versions for like 30+ bucks. Seriously, I had Vista. It stunk. But you have to look up your computer model and know whether it's 32 or 64 bit version. Dan On 11/14/12, Sleepingbeautiie wrote: >>On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 23:54 +0100, Sleepingbeautiie wrote: >> >>Maybe you could write it down next time. >>Do you have a working GIMP now? >> >>2.7 was an "unstable" release - 2.8 likely has fewer bugs overall, but >>there have been some problems reported on Microsoft Windows that >>weren't >>present on Linux, where the main development is done. >> >>You should probably use either 2.6 or 2.8, not 2.7. >> >>Liam > > 2.6 isn't even working for me. It's giving me this stupid error report like > the > following: "gimp-2.6.exe has encountered a problem and needs to close." > > So.. eh. Computer's probably just old. > > -- > Sleepingbeautiie (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) > ___ > gimp-user-list mailing list > gimp-user-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list > ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error
>On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 23:54 +0100, Sleepingbeautiie wrote: > >Maybe you could write it down next time. >Do you have a working GIMP now? > >2.7 was an "unstable" release - 2.8 likely has fewer bugs overall, but >there have been some problems reported on Microsoft Windows that >weren't >present on Linux, where the main development is done. > >You should probably use either 2.6 or 2.8, not 2.7. > >Liam 2.6 isn't even working for me. It's giving me this stupid error report like the following: "gimp-2.6.exe has encountered a problem and needs to close." So.. eh. Computer's probably just old. -- Sleepingbeautiie (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error
On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 23:54 +0100, Sleepingbeautiie wrote: > >On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 20:04 +0100, Sleepingbeautiie wrote: > >Roughly how many brushes do you have? > > > >What is the error exactly? > To be honest, I'm not really sure. Maybe you could write it down next time. > But I do know that there were quite a few > brushes that I didn't really need, so that could be the problem too; after the > error came around, I cleaned out all the brushes and fonts I didn't need, and > then I cleaned out all the other programs that took up too much space, so... > . I > mean, I might try re-loading 2.7., since people told me that 2.8 probably had > a > few bugs in it :/ Do you have a working GIMP now? 2.7 was an "unstable" release - 2.8 likely has fewer bugs overall, but there have been some problems reported on Microsoft Windows that weren't present on Linux, where the main development is done. You should probably use either 2.6 or 2.8, not 2.7. Liam > -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/ - the barefoot typographer ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error
>On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 20:04 +0100, Sleepingbeautiie wrote: >Roughly how many brushes do you have? > >What is the error exactly? > >It's always possible that a brush or a font that you add might make >gimp >go wrong. > >Liam To be honest, I'm not really sure. But I do know that there were quite a few brushes that I didn't really need, so that could be the problem too; after the error came around, I cleaned out all the brushes and fonts I didn't need, and then I cleaned out all the other programs that took up too much space, so... . I mean, I might try re-loading 2.7., since people told me that 2.8 probably had a few bugs in it :/ -- Sleepingbeautiie (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error
On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 20:04 +0100, Sleepingbeautiie wrote: > Yeah, decided to re-submit this thing again... lol. > > Basically, every time I load gimp, it opens for me, ect; but when I close it > (to > throw some brushes in, ect) it loads slower, and then it gives me a > "C++/Library" whatever error... Roughly how many brushes do you have? What is the error exactly? It's always possible that a brush or a font that you add might make gimp go wrong. Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error
Yeah, decided to re-submit this thing again... lol. Basically, every time I load gimp, it opens for me, ect; but when I close it (to throw some brushes in, ect) it loads slower, and then it gives me a "C++/Library" whatever error... But I'm going to install 2.7.1 to see how it works now, since I've cleaned out my computer of some files that seemed to be clogging up the space. Either my desktop is just old, or.. lol. I'unno. :/ And if someone's gonna answer, please let it be related to this discussion. Don't let someone run by and acclaim their own problem in /my/ discussion when they can perfectly create a thread themselves. Thanks. -- Sleepingbeautiie (via www.gimpusers.com/forums) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error.
On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 22:26:25 +0100 Sleepingbeautiie wrote: > >All right, so. I've had GIMP ever since the latest version came out, > >and it hasn't been up to this very day that it's given me an error > >when loading, ad it's never happened before. Ever. It's some > >crud that tells me "Runtime/C++ Error" and that it needs to > >terminate. So... what the heck do I do? Am I not going to be > >able to use GIMP anymore? .__. > > I kinda think the reason for the error has to do something with > GTK2 :/ Thoughts? > > What platform? -- John Culleton Wexford Press Free list of books for self-publishers: http://wexfordpress.net/shortlist.html PDF e-book: "Create Book Covers with Scribus" available at http://www.booklocker.com/books/4055.html ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error.
On 06.11.2012 22:26, Sleepingbeautiie wrote: All right, so. I've had GIMP ever since the latest version came out, and it hasn't been up to this very day that it's given me an error when loading, ad it's never happened before. Ever. It's some crud that tells me "Runtime/C++ Error" and that it needs to terminate. So... what the heck do I do? Am I not going to be able to use GIMP anymore? .__. I kinda think the reason for the error has to do something with GTK2 Why? -- Regards, Michael ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Error.
>All right, so. I've had GIMP ever since the latest version came out, and it >hasn't been up to this very day that it's given me an error when loading, >ad it's never happened before. Ever. It's some crud that tells me >"Runtime/C++ Error" and that it needs to terminate. So... what the heck do >I do? Am I not going to be able to use GIMP anymore? .__. I kinda think the reason for the error has to do something with GTK2 :/ Thoughts? -- Sleepingbeautiie (via gimpusers.com) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error.
Olivier writes: > 2012/11/4 Steve Kinney [...] > Running an OS that works for not against the user is a very > addictive thing. Token on-topic reference: The GIMP was the > first > major gateway drug that started me down the path to a 100% Free > Software world. Ubuntu stopped including the GIMP in its default > installation package, and that's another strike against > Canonical... > sure it's stupidly easy to install, but dang it, GNU/Linux is > supposed to include the GIMP right out of the box, is all! > > :o) > > > The only problem, in my opinion, is that Ubuntu still insists on > fitting on a CD instead of a DVD, for reasons I don't know. off-topic, but http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2012/11/ubuntu-on-the-mongol-steppe-carving-paths-into-emerging-markets (last part) gives one very good reason. ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error.
You know, I used to think abut that, like letting the computer rest. That's very funny. But other than replacing the hard drive or the operating system, which you probably couldn't do either by yourself, here's what you really need to consider. I wish I had thought of it earlier. On Windows Vista you can use the restore feature to return it to an earlier version of the computer's setup. Preferably before whatever software changes occurred to make Gimp run badly, or even perhaps before you ever installed Gimp. However, remember, this feature will totally wipe any changes made to your computer back to the point you choose, so any files, images, contacts, bookmarks etc you wish to save you will have to extract and burn to a disk, ie get off the machine, before you do this process, because it's likely they won't be there anymore. Here's a web page about using it, and i'd research it more if I were you: http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/using-windows-vista-system-restore/ The other thing, is that I believe that the restore function does by itself set up points to return the system to, even if you have never initiated it and established such points yourself. But I am not sure about that, I only used restore in Win 7. So you'll have to see what possibilities, time periods or points, it offers you to travel back to. And remember, I believe this will delete any installed security patches for Vista as well, so you will have to reinstall those again, though I have the feeling you may have not been doing that faithfully unless it's set on automatic. Don't you have a friend or a local shop that you could affordably (or for free) take it to? It sure would make it easier for you. Dan On 11/4/12, Sleepingbeautiie wrote: >>On 04.11.2012 03:00, Sleepingbeautiie wrote: > >>> I have no idea... and running out of memory? ._." That's... a bad >>> thing, isn't it? >>> >>> I'm not working on any images - I haven't been able to access GIMP >>> for three, four days, now, so... > >>Patterns might be another cause for this problem. Fonts, too. > >>> I mean, I'll try and follow what >>> Steve said, but.. then again I might just save my brushes into a >>> folder and then revert back to 2.6 to see if that works. > >>You should move any brushes that didn't come with GIMP itself. >>If you've done this already, did anything change? > >>Note that blindly (re-)installing any version of GIMP won't solve the >>problem if anything you have added is causing this. > > Well, yeah, I have moved all brushes that never came with gimp into an > entirely diff. folder, so... I mean, what do you think? Would it work if, > say, I uninstalled GIMP entirely, waited about a month or two (I can cope) > and then try again? > > -- > Sleepingbeautiie (via gimpusers.com) > ___ > gimp-user-list mailing list > gimp-user-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list > ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
[Gimp-user] Error.
>On 04.11.2012 03:00, Sleepingbeautiie wrote: >> I have no idea... and running out of memory? ._." That's... a bad >> thing, isn't it? >> >> I'm not working on any images - I haven't been able to access GIMP >> for three, four days, now, so... >Patterns might be another cause for this problem. Fonts, too. >> I mean, I'll try and follow what >> Steve said, but.. then again I might just save my brushes into a >> folder and then revert back to 2.6 to see if that works. >You should move any brushes that didn't come with GIMP itself. >If you've done this already, did anything change? >Note that blindly (re-)installing any version of GIMP won't solve the >problem if anything you have added is causing this. Well, yeah, I have moved all brushes that never came with gimp into an entirely diff. folder, so... I mean, what do you think? Would it work if, say, I uninstalled GIMP entirely, waited about a month or two (I can cope) and then try again? -- Sleepingbeautiie (via gimpusers.com) ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error.
On 12-11-04 11:13 AM, Olivier wrote: Unfortunately, Debian, which now has a live CD, also now comes with Gnome 3... Oh, nuts. Thanks for the info. I might still try a live CD just to see what Debian is like but looks like I'm back to Mint once they fix their install. -- Cheers! Kevin. http://www.ve3syb.ca/ |"Nerds make the shiny things that distract Owner of Elecraft K2 #2172 | the mouth-breathers, and that's why we're | powerful!" #include | --Chris Hardwick ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error.
On 11/04/2012 10:52 AM, Sleepingbeautiie wrote: > ...And how did all this shift into Unbuntu, whatever it is?... It looks like your problem is something wrong with MS Vista more than with the GIMP. I made a remark to the effect that the "right" way to fix that is to install "an operating system that works" and Ubuntu is an example of that. The Cinnamon version of Mint is more so, lately. Both are free to download and install. > /Anyways/, re-downloading 2.6 didn't help, and I got the same error message > as before. Reinstalling the previous version of the GIMP really should have worked, and since it did not, this tends to rule out a bug in the newer version as the source of the problem. This looks like the operating system, not the GIMP that's causing the problem. There are too many tings that could be going wrong, for us to make any more useful suggestions about how to get the GIMP running on your system. > Should I just wait for updates for 2.8., or? Because this is the only > computer system I actually have, and I can't just roll off and buy PS, since > that costs like craploads of money (for me), so... Gimp's the best I have :/ > And if I'm not able to even edit my own sites anymore, then I'll wait > til the problem's solved, I suppose. There is no reason to believe that the next version of the GIMP will work for you, until the computer itself has been repaired. > And to tell the truth, I know that people usually don't insert this into > their problems here, but I'm just really confused and a little frustrated > with all the suggestions, I can only process so much. Not trying to be mean > or anything, just... frustrated. One said that Gimp's memory is failing, and > another said I could try a re-load 2.6., which I did, but failed. Might just > be the computer, or Gimp itself. Not sure, so... might not reply to this > discussion for a bit :/ Fixes that involve installing an operating system are normal for some of us, but if you don't have the experience to do that it's not a practical answer. Since you seem to really need an image editor, the best thing I can suggest at this point is to start looking for an honest repair shop. :o/ Steve ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error.
On 04.11.2012 03:00, Sleepingbeautiie wrote: I have no idea... and running out of memory? ._." That's... a bad thing, isn't it? I'm not working on any images - I haven't been able to access GIMP for three, four days, now, so... Patterns might be another cause for this problem. Fonts, too. I mean, I'll try and follow what Steve said, but.. then again I might just save my brushes into a folder and then revert back to 2.6 to see if that works. You should move any brushes that didn't come with GIMP itself. If you've done this already, did anything change? Note that blindly (re-)installing any version of GIMP won't solve the problem if anything you have added is causing this. -- Regards, Michael ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error.
Yeah, it's ok. Give it about ten years, you'll know what to do... :) On 11/4/12, Sleepingbeautiie wrote: >>On 11/03/2012 11:28 PM, Daniel Smith wrote: > >>> Because (left out) a Vista machine means it's probably about >>> five years old or so, meaning that it could possibly be filled, and >>> or replace the drive as well. It's gonna go sometime soon. Just thoughts. >>> And they're so cheap now. >>> Dan > >>Ubuntu 10 has worked great for me but alas, Canonical has gone the >>way of the "dedicated touchscreen interface". I will be bailing out >>when the version I am using reaches "end of life" next year. Can't >>sit a very computer illiterate user in front of the "Unity" desktop, >>and expect them to figure it out and use it without problems. Can't >>expect me to toss 20 years of reasonably efficient workflow habits >>out the window either... > >>I have been very impressed with Mint - the other day I had occasion >>to use the Live DVD in conjunction with a printer/scanner on a >>random PC on a random office LAN, and the thing "just worked" all >>around. > >>Running an OS that works for not against the user is a very >>addictive thing. Token on-topic reference: The GIMP was the first >>major gateway drug that started me down the path to a 100% Free >>Software world. Ubuntu stopped including the GIMP in its default >>installation package, and that's another strike against Canonical... >>sure it's stupidly easy to install, but dang it, GNU/Linux is >>supposed to include the GIMP right out of the box, is all! > >>:o) > > >>> On 11/3/12, Daniel Smith wrote: I really have grown fond of avg's pc tuneup. Normally I in the past didn't use such utilities, but I tried (and paid!) for it once, and love it. Still use the free avg antivirus though. I would have recommended to upgrade to Win 7 and wipe the whole drive. Never really liked Vista that much. Seemed like only a little better than that old Longhorn beta there was going around for a while. But I would also just take at least a glance at the drive to see how much free space there is on it. Dan On 11/3/12, Steve Kinney wrote: > On 11/03/2012 09:02 PM, Jernej Simončič wrote: >> On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 13:22:52 -0400, Steve Kinney wrote: >> >>> I would run a "registry cleaner" >> >> Don't. Just don't. At best, they do nothing, and at worst they screw >> up >> the >> machine (had to fix too many machines that "registry cleaners" and >> "optimizers" left in unusable state). > > The first thing a registry cleaner does - if it's a decent one like > the Wise cleaner - is back up the existing registry files to a > location where they won't be overwritten during the OS-native > registry backup rotation. Then it conducts a scan and removes > orphaned keys that point to non-existent files and directories, > redundant keys, etc. In some cases, I have seen processes that > access the registry frequently, i.e. complex application start-up > routines - run 2x faster after cleaning. Usually the result is not > quite that impressive. > > In a hypothetical worst case where damage is done by the cleaning > process - something I have never seen happen in a few hundred > practical cases - the saved registry can be restored with a single > command and, in effect, "nothing happened at all." Any problems > that need repair are the same ones that were there before the > registry cleaner was tried. > > Progressive registry bloat is a feature, not a bug. It makes a > computer with a Microsoft operating system appear to be "getting old > and slowing down," which is a Good Thing if you are selling > computers or operating systems. Not so good if you are the user who > owns the machine in question. > > The best repair for any Microsoft operating system is to replace it > with an operating system that works, or, failing that, reinstall the > one that came with the machine. But sometimes that's not an option, > alas. > > :o/ > > Steve > > > > ___ > gimp-user-list mailing list > gimp-user-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list > >>> > ...And how did all this shift into Unbuntu, whatever it is?... > > /Anyways/, re-downloading 2.6 didn't help, and I got the same error message > as before. I'm afraid of following whatever Steve suggested (no offense), > since I think it might screw up my computer's system. I don't know. > -Shrugs.- Should I just wait for updates for 2.8., or? Because this is the > only computer system I actually have, and I can't just roll off and buy PS, > since that costs like craploads of money (for me), so... Gimp's the best I > have :/ And if I'm not able to even edit my own sites anymore, then I'll > wait til the proble
[Gimp-user] Error.
>On 11/03/2012 11:28 PM, Daniel Smith wrote: >> Because (left out) a Vista machine means it's probably about >> five years old or so, meaning that it could possibly be filled, and >> or replace the drive as well. It's gonna go sometime soon. Just thoughts. >> And they're so cheap now. >> Dan >Ubuntu 10 has worked great for me but alas, Canonical has gone the >way of the "dedicated touchscreen interface". I will be bailing out >when the version I am using reaches "end of life" next year. Can't >sit a very computer illiterate user in front of the "Unity" desktop, >and expect them to figure it out and use it without problems. Can't >expect me to toss 20 years of reasonably efficient workflow habits >out the window either... >I have been very impressed with Mint - the other day I had occasion >to use the Live DVD in conjunction with a printer/scanner on a >random PC on a random office LAN, and the thing "just worked" all >around. >Running an OS that works for not against the user is a very >addictive thing. Token on-topic reference: The GIMP was the first >major gateway drug that started me down the path to a 100% Free >Software world. Ubuntu stopped including the GIMP in its default >installation package, and that's another strike against Canonical... >sure it's stupidly easy to install, but dang it, GNU/Linux is >supposed to include the GIMP right out of the box, is all! >:o) >> On 11/3/12, Daniel Smith wrote: >>> I really have grown fond of avg's pc tuneup. >>> Normally I in the past didn't use such utilities, but I >>> tried (and paid!) for it once, and love it. Still use the >>> free avg antivirus though. >>> I would have recommended to upgrade to Win 7 and >>> wipe the whole drive. Never really liked Vista that much. >>> Seemed like only a little better than that old Longhorn >>> beta there was going around for a while. >>> But I would also just take at least a glance at the drive to >>> see how much free space there is on it. >>> Dan >>> >>> On 11/3/12, Steve Kinney wrote: On 11/03/2012 09:02 PM, Jernej Simončič wrote: > On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 13:22:52 -0400, Steve Kinney wrote: > >> I would run a "registry cleaner" > > Don't. Just don't. At best, they do nothing, and at worst they screw up > the > machine (had to fix too many machines that "registry cleaners" and > "optimizers" left in unusable state). The first thing a registry cleaner does - if it's a decent one like the Wise cleaner - is back up the existing registry files to a location where they won't be overwritten during the OS-native registry backup rotation. Then it conducts a scan and removes orphaned keys that point to non-existent files and directories, redundant keys, etc. In some cases, I have seen processes that access the registry frequently, i.e. complex application start-up routines - run 2x faster after cleaning. Usually the result is not quite that impressive. In a hypothetical worst case where damage is done by the cleaning process - something I have never seen happen in a few hundred practical cases - the saved registry can be restored with a single command and, in effect, "nothing happened at all." Any problems that need repair are the same ones that were there before the registry cleaner was tried. Progressive registry bloat is a feature, not a bug. It makes a computer with a Microsoft operating system appear to be "getting old and slowing down," which is a Good Thing if you are selling computers or operating systems. Not so good if you are the user who owns the machine in question. The best repair for any Microsoft operating system is to replace it with an operating system that works, or, failing that, reinstall the one that came with the machine. But sometimes that's not an option, alas. :o/ Steve ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list >>> >> ...And how did all this shift into Unbuntu, whatever it is?... /Anyways/, re-downloading 2.6 didn't help, and I got the same error message as before. I'm afraid of following whatever Steve suggested (no offense), since I think it might screw up my computer's system. I don't know. -Shrugs.- Should I just wait for updates for 2.8., or? Because this is the only computer system I actually have, and I can't just roll off and buy PS, since that costs like craploads of money (for me), so... Gimp's the best I have :/ And if I'm not able to even edit my own sites anymore, then I'll wait til the problem's solved, I suppose. And to tell the truth, I know that people usually don't insert this into their problems here, but I'm just really confused and a little frustrated with all the suggestions, I can only process so mu
Re: [Gimp-user] Error.
2012/11/4 Steve Kinney Mint is very pleasant and refreshing indeed, and I'll shift to it if combining Ubuntu 12.10 with Gnome 2 is impossible. I run Ubuntu 11.04 which came with Unity but I was able to remove all Unity packages and install Gnome 2. The one bug I found in Gnome 2 was the inability to do session snapshots. I have looked at Mint and tried a live CD of it. I would like to do a test install in to a spare partition but the installer won't let me choose an option to *not* install a boot loader. I'm happy with the boot loader I have and 3 lines added to a config file would let me add Mint to my list of boot options. At least Mint 13 now recognizes the RAID 1 configuration of my hard drives. The other option I'm considering is Debian. I haven't checked to see if there is a live CD of it that I can use to some initial testing. -- Cheers! Kevin. http://www.ve3syb.ca/ |"Nerds make the shiny things that distract Owner of Elecraft K2 #2172 | the mouth-breathers, and that's why we're | powerful!" #include | --Chris Hardwick ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error.
Wow, thanks to both (all) of you! I'll have to taste the mint, so to speak. I was running Ubuntu 11 till my latest machinicide. I thought though when I installed it that Linux has come incredibly far in ease of use since when I used to use it back in the old Red Hat 4, 7 etc command line startup days. Of course, I just did it with an ubuntu cd I bought off of ebay for 4 bucks. So no size worries for me. But I did notice when I was searching that error above, or different combinations of its terms included, that it seemed cross-OS, that different #s (gmem.c: 165, 135, etc) of it occurred in various linux and windows versions that people had reported bugs or complained of. Except for, notably, on Macs. Don't know fer sure about that though. On second search through it seemed a lot had to do with corrupted or unmanageably large conversion files etc. crashing memory. This is a very similar error: https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/846389 Dan On 11/4/12, Olivier wrote: > 2012/11/4 Steve Kinney > >> >> Ubuntu 10 has worked great for me but alas, Canonical has gone the >> way of the "dedicated touchscreen interface". I will be bailing out >> when the version I am using reaches "end of life" next year. Can't >> sit a very computer illiterate user in front of the "Unity" desktop, >> and expect them to figure it out and use it without problems. Can't >> expect me to toss 20 years of reasonably efficient workflow habits >> out the window either... >> >> You don't need to do that. Using Ubuntu 12.04 with the look and feel of > Ubuntu 10.04 is rather easy. Of course, it needs a little work, but nothing > complicated. I'm using that on all my computers and on all the computers I > manage. The major visible differences is that I cannot use any more the > theme I liked (but probably still a little more work probably would do > that, if it was so important), and the System global menu is now hidden in > the Applications menu. > > I did not yet try version 12.10, and Ubuntu Gnome Remix 12.10 seems > promising, but it uses Gnome 3, which some people consider as much > offending as Unity... > > I have been very impressed with Mint - the other day I had occasion >> to use the Live DVD in conjunction with a printer/scanner on a >> random PC on a random office LAN, and the thing "just worked" all >> around. >> >> Mint is very pleasant and refreshing indeed, and I'll shift to it if > combining Ubuntu 12.10 with Gnome 2 is impossible. > > >> Running an OS that works for not against the user is a very >> addictive thing. Token on-topic reference: The GIMP was the first >> major gateway drug that started me down the path to a 100% Free >> Software world. Ubuntu stopped including the GIMP in its default >> installation package, and that's another strike against Canonical... >> sure it's stupidly easy to install, but dang it, GNU/Linux is >> supposed to include the GIMP right out of the box, is all! >> >> :o) >> > > The only problem, in my opinion, is that Ubuntu still insists on fitting on > a CD instead of a DVD, for reasons I don't know. > > -- > Olivier Lecarme > ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error.
2012/11/4 Steve Kinney > > Ubuntu 10 has worked great for me but alas, Canonical has gone the > way of the "dedicated touchscreen interface". I will be bailing out > when the version I am using reaches "end of life" next year. Can't > sit a very computer illiterate user in front of the "Unity" desktop, > and expect them to figure it out and use it without problems. Can't > expect me to toss 20 years of reasonably efficient workflow habits > out the window either... > > You don't need to do that. Using Ubuntu 12.04 with the look and feel of Ubuntu 10.04 is rather easy. Of course, it needs a little work, but nothing complicated. I'm using that on all my computers and on all the computers I manage. The major visible differences is that I cannot use any more the theme I liked (but probably still a little more work probably would do that, if it was so important), and the System global menu is now hidden in the Applications menu. I did not yet try version 12.10, and Ubuntu Gnome Remix 12.10 seems promising, but it uses Gnome 3, which some people consider as much offending as Unity... I have been very impressed with Mint - the other day I had occasion > to use the Live DVD in conjunction with a printer/scanner on a > random PC on a random office LAN, and the thing "just worked" all > around. > > Mint is very pleasant and refreshing indeed, and I'll shift to it if combining Ubuntu 12.10 with Gnome 2 is impossible. > Running an OS that works for not against the user is a very > addictive thing. Token on-topic reference: The GIMP was the first > major gateway drug that started me down the path to a 100% Free > Software world. Ubuntu stopped including the GIMP in its default > installation package, and that's another strike against Canonical... > sure it's stupidly easy to install, but dang it, GNU/Linux is > supposed to include the GIMP right out of the box, is all! > > :o) > The only problem, in my opinion, is that Ubuntu still insists on fitting on a CD instead of a DVD, for reasons I don't know. -- Olivier Lecarme ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error.
On 11/03/2012 11:28 PM, Daniel Smith wrote: > Because (left out) a Vista machine means it's probably about > five years old or so, meaning that it could possibly be filled, and > or replace the drive as well. It's gonna go sometime soon. Just thoughts. > And they're so cheap now. > Dan Ubuntu 10 has worked great for me but alas, Canonical has gone the way of the "dedicated touchscreen interface". I will be bailing out when the version I am using reaches "end of life" next year. Can't sit a very computer illiterate user in front of the "Unity" desktop, and expect them to figure it out and use it without problems. Can't expect me to toss 20 years of reasonably efficient workflow habits out the window either... I have been very impressed with Mint - the other day I had occasion to use the Live DVD in conjunction with a printer/scanner on a random PC on a random office LAN, and the thing "just worked" all around. Running an OS that works for not against the user is a very addictive thing. Token on-topic reference: The GIMP was the first major gateway drug that started me down the path to a 100% Free Software world. Ubuntu stopped including the GIMP in its default installation package, and that's another strike against Canonical... sure it's stupidly easy to install, but dang it, GNU/Linux is supposed to include the GIMP right out of the box, is all! :o) > On 11/3/12, Daniel Smith wrote: >> I really have grown fond of avg's pc tuneup. >> Normally I in the past didn't use such utilities, but I >> tried (and paid!) for it once, and love it. Still use the >> free avg antivirus though. >> I would have recommended to upgrade to Win 7 and >> wipe the whole drive. Never really liked Vista that much. >> Seemed like only a little better than that old Longhorn >> beta there was going around for a while. >> But I would also just take at least a glance at the drive to >> see how much free space there is on it. >> Dan >> >> On 11/3/12, Steve Kinney wrote: >>> On 11/03/2012 09:02 PM, Jernej Simončič wrote: On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 13:22:52 -0400, Steve Kinney wrote: > I would run a "registry cleaner" Don't. Just don't. At best, they do nothing, and at worst they screw up the machine (had to fix too many machines that "registry cleaners" and "optimizers" left in unusable state). >>> >>> The first thing a registry cleaner does - if it's a decent one like >>> the Wise cleaner - is back up the existing registry files to a >>> location where they won't be overwritten during the OS-native >>> registry backup rotation. Then it conducts a scan and removes >>> orphaned keys that point to non-existent files and directories, >>> redundant keys, etc. In some cases, I have seen processes that >>> access the registry frequently, i.e. complex application start-up >>> routines - run 2x faster after cleaning. Usually the result is not >>> quite that impressive. >>> >>> In a hypothetical worst case where damage is done by the cleaning >>> process - something I have never seen happen in a few hundred >>> practical cases - the saved registry can be restored with a single >>> command and, in effect, "nothing happened at all." Any problems >>> that need repair are the same ones that were there before the >>> registry cleaner was tried. >>> >>> Progressive registry bloat is a feature, not a bug. It makes a >>> computer with a Microsoft operating system appear to be "getting old >>> and slowing down," which is a Good Thing if you are selling >>> computers or operating systems. Not so good if you are the user who >>> owns the machine in question. >>> >>> The best repair for any Microsoft operating system is to replace it >>> with an operating system that works, or, failing that, reinstall the >>> one that came with the machine. But sometimes that's not an option, >>> alas. >>> >>> :o/ >>> >>> Steve >>> >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> gimp-user-list mailing list >>> gimp-user-list@gnome.org >>> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list >>> >> > ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error.
Because (left out) a Vista machine means it's probably about five years old or so, meaning that it could possibly be filled, and or replace the drive as well. It's gonna go sometime soon. Just thoughts. And they're so cheap now. Dan On 11/3/12, Daniel Smith wrote: > I really have grown fond of avg's pc tuneup. > Normally I in the past didn't use such utilities, but I > tried (and paid!) for it once, and love it. Still use the > free avg antivirus though. > I would have recommended to upgrade to Win 7 and > wipe the whole drive. Never really liked Vista that much. > Seemed like only a little better than that old Longhorn > beta there was going around for a while. > But I would also just take at least a glance at the drive to > see how much free space there is on it. > Dan > > On 11/3/12, Steve Kinney wrote: >> On 11/03/2012 09:02 PM, Jernej Simončič wrote: >>> On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 13:22:52 -0400, Steve Kinney wrote: >>> I would run a "registry cleaner" >>> >>> Don't. Just don't. At best, they do nothing, and at worst they screw up >>> the >>> machine (had to fix too many machines that "registry cleaners" and >>> "optimizers" left in unusable state). >> >> The first thing a registry cleaner does - if it's a decent one like >> the Wise cleaner - is back up the existing registry files to a >> location where they won't be overwritten during the OS-native >> registry backup rotation. Then it conducts a scan and removes >> orphaned keys that point to non-existent files and directories, >> redundant keys, etc. In some cases, I have seen processes that >> access the registry frequently, i.e. complex application start-up >> routines - run 2x faster after cleaning. Usually the result is not >> quite that impressive. >> >> In a hypothetical worst case where damage is done by the cleaning >> process - something I have never seen happen in a few hundred >> practical cases - the saved registry can be restored with a single >> command and, in effect, "nothing happened at all." Any problems >> that need repair are the same ones that were there before the >> registry cleaner was tried. >> >> Progressive registry bloat is a feature, not a bug. It makes a >> computer with a Microsoft operating system appear to be "getting old >> and slowing down," which is a Good Thing if you are selling >> computers or operating systems. Not so good if you are the user who >> owns the machine in question. >> >> The best repair for any Microsoft operating system is to replace it >> with an operating system that works, or, failing that, reinstall the >> one that came with the machine. But sometimes that's not an option, >> alas. >> >> :o/ >> >> Steve >> >> >> >> ___ >> gimp-user-list mailing list >> gimp-user-list@gnome.org >> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list >> > ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error.
I really have grown fond of avg's pc tuneup. Normally I in the past didn't use such utilities, but I tried (and paid!) for it once, and love it. Still use the free avg antivirus though. I would have recommended to upgrade to Win 7 and wipe the whole drive. Never really liked Vista that much. Seemed like only a little better than that old Longhorn beta there was going around for a while. But I would also just take at least a glance at the drive to see how much free space there is on it. Dan On 11/3/12, Steve Kinney wrote: > On 11/03/2012 09:02 PM, Jernej Simončič wrote: >> On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 13:22:52 -0400, Steve Kinney wrote: >> >>> I would run a "registry cleaner" >> >> Don't. Just don't. At best, they do nothing, and at worst they screw up >> the >> machine (had to fix too many machines that "registry cleaners" and >> "optimizers" left in unusable state). > > The first thing a registry cleaner does - if it's a decent one like > the Wise cleaner - is back up the existing registry files to a > location where they won't be overwritten during the OS-native > registry backup rotation. Then it conducts a scan and removes > orphaned keys that point to non-existent files and directories, > redundant keys, etc. In some cases, I have seen processes that > access the registry frequently, i.e. complex application start-up > routines - run 2x faster after cleaning. Usually the result is not > quite that impressive. > > In a hypothetical worst case where damage is done by the cleaning > process - something I have never seen happen in a few hundred > practical cases - the saved registry can be restored with a single > command and, in effect, "nothing happened at all." Any problems > that need repair are the same ones that were there before the > registry cleaner was tried. > > Progressive registry bloat is a feature, not a bug. It makes a > computer with a Microsoft operating system appear to be "getting old > and slowing down," which is a Good Thing if you are selling > computers or operating systems. Not so good if you are the user who > owns the machine in question. > > The best repair for any Microsoft operating system is to replace it > with an operating system that works, or, failing that, reinstall the > one that came with the machine. But sometimes that's not an option, > alas. > > :o/ > > Steve > > > > ___ > gimp-user-list mailing list > gimp-user-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list > ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
Re: [Gimp-user] Error.
On 11/03/2012 09:02 PM, Jernej Simončič wrote: > On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 13:22:52 -0400, Steve Kinney wrote: > >> I would run a "registry cleaner" > > Don't. Just don't. At best, they do nothing, and at worst they screw up the > machine (had to fix too many machines that "registry cleaners" and > "optimizers" left in unusable state). The first thing a registry cleaner does - if it's a decent one like the Wise cleaner - is back up the existing registry files to a location where they won't be overwritten during the OS-native registry backup rotation. Then it conducts a scan and removes orphaned keys that point to non-existent files and directories, redundant keys, etc. In some cases, I have seen processes that access the registry frequently, i.e. complex application start-up routines - run 2x faster after cleaning. Usually the result is not quite that impressive. In a hypothetical worst case where damage is done by the cleaning process - something I have never seen happen in a few hundred practical cases - the saved registry can be restored with a single command and, in effect, "nothing happened at all." Any problems that need repair are the same ones that were there before the registry cleaner was tried. Progressive registry bloat is a feature, not a bug. It makes a computer with a Microsoft operating system appear to be "getting old and slowing down," which is a Good Thing if you are selling computers or operating systems. Not so good if you are the user who owns the machine in question. The best repair for any Microsoft operating system is to replace it with an operating system that works, or, failing that, reinstall the one that came with the machine. But sometimes that's not an option, alas. :o/ Steve ___ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
