Looks like apples llvm is not based on master branch.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16545037
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Frederic Lecaille
Gesendet: 14. Februar 2019 16:13:01 MEZ
An: Patrick Hemmer
CC: Olivier Houchard , Aleksandar Lazic
, haproxy@formilux.org
Hi Tim.
Am 13.02.2019 um 17:57 schrieb Tim Duesterhus:
> Willy,
> Aleks,
> List,
>
> this (absolutely non-ready-to-merge) patch adds support for brotli
> compression as suggested in issue #21:
> https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/21
Cool ;-)
> It is tested on Ubuntu Xenial with libbrotl
Am 13.02.2019 um 14:45 schrieb Patrick Hemmer:
> Trying to compile haproxy on my local machine for testing purposes and am
> running into the following:
Which compiler do you use?
> # make TARGET=osx
> src/proto_http.c:293:1: error: argument to 'section' attribute is not
> valid f
Hi.
Am 13.02.2019 um 00:21 schrieb Norman Branitsky:
> I have an HAProxy 1.7 server sitting in front of a number of Docker Enterprise
> Manager nodes and Worker nodes.
>
> The Worker nodes don’t appear to have any problem with HAProxy terminating the
> SSL and connecting to them via HTTP.
>
> Th
Hi.
Am 12.02.2019 um 18:36 schrieb Mildis:
> Hi list,
>
> haproxy is segfaulting multiple times these days for no apparent reason.
> At first i thought is was a load issue but even few RPS made it crash.
>
> Symptoms are always the same : segfault of a worker then spawn of a new.
> If load is ve
Hi all.
Wow so much feedback, thanks all for the answers ;-)
Am 12.02.2019 um 15:23 schrieb Alexandre Cassen:
> There has been a lot of applications/stack built around DPDK last few years.
> Mostly because people found it easy to code stuff around DPDK and are so happy
> to display perf graph abo
Am 11.02.2019 um 10:40 schrieb Christopher Faulet:
> Le 09/02/2019 à 10:47, Aleksandar Lazic a écrit :
>> Hi Christopher.
>>
>> Am 07-02-2019 22:09, schrieb Christopher Faulet:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This patch adds a new component in contrib. It is a P
Am 10.02.2019 um 12:06 schrieb Lukas Tribus:
> On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 at 10:48, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> I have seen this in some twitter posts and asked me if it's something
>> useable for a Loadbalancer like HAProxy ?
>>
>> https:
Hi.
I have seen this in some twitter posts and asked me if it's something useable
for a Loadbalancer like HAProxy ?
https://www.dpdk.org/
To be honest it looks like a virtual NIC, but I'm not sure.
Regards
Aleks
Hi Christopher.
Am 07-02-2019 22:09, schrieb Christopher Faulet:
Hi,
This patch adds a new component in contrib. It is a Prometheus
exporter for HAProxy.
[snipp]
More details in the README.
I'm not especially a Prometheus expert. And I must admit I never use
it. So if anyone have comments
Am 06.02.2019 um 17:19 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Hi Aleks,
>
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 05:16:58PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>> Maybe this patch was to late for 1.9.4 please can you consider to add it
>> to 2.0 and later 1.9.5, thanks.
>>
>> https://www.mail
Hi James.
Am 06.02.2019 um 16:16 schrieb James Root:
> Hi All,
>
> I am doing some research and have not really found a great way to configure
> HAProxy to get the desired results. The problem I face is that I a service
> backed by two separate collections of servers. I would like to split traffi
Hi willy.
Am 06.02.2019 um 15:25 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Hi,
>
> HAProxy 1.9.4 was released on 2019/02/06. It added 65 new commits
> after version 1.9.3.
Images are updated.
https://hub.docker.com/r/me2digital/haproxy-19-boringssl
https://hub.docker.com/r/me2digital/haproxy19
Maybe this patch
Hi Federico.
Am 06.02.2019 um 15:33 schrieb Federico Iezzi:
> Hey there,
>
> Maybe this is gonna be a very simple answer.
> In HAProxy 1.5.18 seems that the defaults maxconn have a global influence and
> not per backend one.
>
> In my case I have global maxconn at 5120001, while defaults at 256
Hi Lukas.
Am 04.02.2019 um 21:39 schrieb Lukas Tribus:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 at 12:14, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> I have just opened a new Issue about DoH for resolving.
>>
>> https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/33
>&
Hi.
I have just opened a new Issue about DoH for resolving.
https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/33
As I know that this is a major change in the Infrastructure I would like to
here what you think about this suggestion.
My opinion was at the beginning against this change as there was only
Sorry have forgotten to add.
Need to backport to 1.9
Regards
Aleks
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Aleksandar Lazic
Gesendet: 2. Februar 2019 10:01:26 MEZ
An: haproxy@formilux.org
Betreff: [PATCH] DOC: Add HTX part in the documentation
Hi.
attached a doc update for the new
Hi.
attached a doc update for the new features of HAProxy 1.9.
I hope the patch full fills the CONTRIBUTING rules as
I haven't send patched to the list for long time ;-)
Regards
AleksFrom c0e025e81b87a23f679aff80bddc02a96c4d43b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aleksandar Lazic
Date: Sat,
Hi.
Do you have any errors in lighthttpds log?
Regards
Aleks
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Veiko Kukk
Gesendet: 1. Februar 2019 12:33:39 MEZ
An: Aleksandar Lazic
CC: haproxy@formilux.org
Betreff: Re: Early connection close, incomplete transfers
On 2019-01-31 12:57
ential and/or privileged information. If you are not the named
> addressee or have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
> immediately. The unauthorised disclosure, use or reproduction of this email's
> content is prohibited. Unless expressly agreed, no reliance on
Hi.
Am 31.01.2019 um 10:29 schrieb Veiko Kukk:
> HAproxy 1.9.3, but happens also with 1.7.10, 1.7.11.
>
> Connections are getting closed during data transfer phase at random sizes on
> backend. Sometimes just as little as 420 bytes get transferred, but usually
> more is transferred before sudde
Hi.
Am 30.01.2019 um 13:08 schrieb Erlangga Pradipta Suryanto:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to use haproxy to proxy rtmp stream to an nginx rtmp backend.
> what we want to achieve is, we will add more nginx rtmp servers on the
> backend, and when we do we want to reload the haproxy config without closin
t; —
> Luke Seelenbinder
> Stadia Maps | Founder
> stadiamaps.com
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 12:02 PM, Aleksandar Lazic
> wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>
>> Am 30.01.2019 um 11:53 schrieb Marco Corte:
>>
>
>
Hi.
Am 30.01.2019 um 11:53 schrieb Marco Corte:
> Il 2019-01-30 11:40 Luke Seelenbinder ha scritto:
>
>
>> Are you on 1.9.x? 1.8.x does not support reuse of backend connections
>> when using an h2 frontend. 1.9.x does support this and it works quite
>> nicely.
>
> Yes! I am on version 1.8.17.
>
Hi.
I plan to use HAProxy 1.9.x cache with ~50-100k Objects which will could use
1-2G RAM.
Have anyone used the cache features in prod with such specs?
The Idea is to use HAProxy in AUS for a Webserver in FR for caching as the
latency delays the delivery from FR to AUS Clients.
Thank you for
Am 29.01.2019 um 06:52 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Hi,
>
> HAProxy 1.9.3 was released on 2019/01/29. It added 35 new commits after
> version 1.9.2.
>
> It mainly addresses a few stability issues affecting versions up to 1.9.2.
> Several of these issues are only reproducible when using H2 to connect
Hi.
Am 25-01-2019 08:55, schrieb Kevin Zhu:
HI HAProxy Team,:
I am trying to use Intel qat work with HAProxy-1.9.0, but it work very
unstable. and i had other try HAProxy-1.8.16 and it work will, How can
i find what is wrong?
1.8.16 and 1.9.0 use same hardwave and system to running and compil
Hi List.
Am 25-01-2019 01:01, schrieb PiBa-NL:
Hi List,
Attached a regtest which i 'think' should pass.
** s1 0.0 === expect tbl.dec[1].key == ":authority"
s1 0.0 EXPECT tbl.dec[1].key (host) == ":authority" failed
It seems to me the Host <> Authority conversion isn't happening
p
Am 24.01.2019 um 15:09 schrieb Aleksandar Lazic:
> Am 24.01.2019 um 03:49 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 09:37:46PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 23.01.2019 um 21:27 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
>>>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 0
Am 24.01.2019 um 03:49 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 09:37:46PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>>
>> Am 23.01.2019 um 21:27 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
>>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 09:08:00PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>>>> Should it be possible
Am 23.01.2019 um 21:27 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 09:08:00PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>> Should it be possible to have fe with h1 and be server h2(alpn h2), as I
>> expect this or similar return value when I go thru haproxy?
>
> Yes absolutely.
Hi Willy.
Am 23.01.2019 um 19:50 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Hi Aleks,
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 06:58:25PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>> backend be_generic_tcp
>> mode http
>> balance source
>> timeout check 5s
>> option tcp-check
>>
&g
n/2019:17:50:50.727] public_tcp public_tcp/ -1/-1/-1/-1/0 0 0 - -
PR-- 1/1/0/0/0 0/0 ""
<30>1 2019-01-23T17:50:50+00:00 doh-001 haproxy 1 - - 127.0.0.1:54178
[23/Jan/2019:17:50:50.715] public_tcp be_generic_tcp/google-mail 0/0/13/-1/13
502 208 - - SH-- 1/1/0/0/0 0/0 "GET / HTTP/1.1"
Hi Lukas.
Am 23.01.2019 um 10:24 schrieb Luke Seelenbinder:
> Hi Willy,
>
> Thanks for continuing to look into this.
>
>>
>
>> I've place an nginx instance after my local haproxy dev config, and
>> found something which might explain what you're observing : the process
>> apparently leaks FDs
Am 22.01.2019 um 21:45 schrieb Adam Langley:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 12:13 PM Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>> Sorry for my dump question, I just want to be save not to break something.
>>
>> It would be nice to have the option '-key-update' in client.cc and server.cc
Tim.
Am 22.01.2019 um 20:57 schrieb Tim Düsterhus:
> Aleks,
>
> Am 22.01.19 um 20:50 schrieb Aleksandar Lazic:
>> This means that the function in haproxy works but the check should be
>> adopted to
>> match both cases, right?
>
> At least one should investiga
Am 22.01.2019 um 20:54 schrieb Adam Langley:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 11:45 AM Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>> Can it be reused to test a specific server like?
>>
>> ssl/test/runner/runner -test "KeyUpdate-ToServer" 127.0.0.1:8443
>
> Not easily: it drives the i
Tim.
Am 22.01.2019 um 20:26 schrieb Tim Düsterhus:
> Aleks,
>
> Am 22.01.19 um 19:38 schrieb Aleksandar Lazic:
>> ## test results in:
>> "/tmp/haregtests-2019-01-22_18-28-24.aBghMD/vtc.3398.76167f9e"
>> s10.0 EXPECT req.http.test3maskff (2001:db8:
Am 22.01.2019 um 20:30 schrieb Adam Langley:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 11:16 AM Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>> Agree that I get a 400 with this command.
>>
>> `echo 'K' | ./tool/bssl s_client -connect mail.google.com:443`
>
> (Note that "K" on its
Am 22.01.2019 um 20:04 schrieb Adam Langley:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 10:54 AM Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>> Do have boringssl a similar tool like s_client?
>
> BoringSSL builds tool/bssl (in the build directory), which is similar.
> However it doesn't have any magic in
Am 22.01.2019 um 19:54 schrieb Aleksandar Lazic:
> Cool, thanks.
>
> Do have boringssl a similar tool like s_client?
>
> I don't like to build openssl just for s_client call :-)
Answer my own question.
bssl is the boringssl tool command.
The open question is why the test
Cool, thanks.
Do have boringssl a similar tool like s_client?
I don't like to build openssl just for s_client call :-)
Regards
Aleks
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Janusz Dziemidowicz
Gesendet: 22. Jänner 2019 19:49:15 MEZ
An: Aleksandar Lazic
CC: HAProxy
Betref
Hi.
I have now build haproxy with boringssl and it looks quite good.
Is it the recommended way to simply make a git clone without any branch or tag?
Does anyone know how the KeyUpdate can be tested?
###
HA-Proxy version 1.9.2 2019/01/16 - https://haproxy.org/
Build options :
TARGET = linux262
Am 21.01.2019 um 23:40 schrieb Joao Guimaraes:
> Hi Haproxy team!
>
> I've been trying to figure out how to perform automatic redirects based on
> source URL transformations.
>
> *Basically I need the following redirect: *
>
> mysite.*abc* redirected to *abc*.mysite.com .
Maybe you can reu
Hi Luke.
Am 21.01.2019 um 10:30 schrieb Luke Seelenbinder:
> Hi all,
>
> One more bug (or configuration hole) from our transition to 1.9.x using
> end-to-end h2 connections.
>
> After enabling h2 backends (technically `server … alpn h2,http/1.1`), we
> began seeing a high number of backend /se
Thank you for clarification.
Regard
Aleks
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Adam Langley
Gesendet: 21. Jänner 2019 00:12:59 MEZ
An: Aleksandar Lazic
CC: haproxy@formilux.org, Willy Tarreau , eb...@haproxy.com
Betreff: Re: HAProxy with OpenSSL 1.1.1 breaks when TLS 1.3 KeyUpdate
Hi.
As far as I understood the keyupdate
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8446 4.6.3
which you refer proper isn't it also a option to use
https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/TLS1.3#Renegotiation
which refers to https://www.openssl.org/docs/manmaster/man3/SSL_key_update.html
instead of the sugge
Cool, thanks :-)
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Lukas Tribus
Gesendet: 18. Jänner 2019 14:14:06 MEZ
An: Aleksandar Lazic
CC: haproxy , Willy Tarreau , "Tim
Düsterhus"
Betreff: Re: haproxy issue tracker discussion
Hello Aleksandar,
On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 at 12:54,
Hi.
As there are now the github templates in the repo can / should we start to
create issues & features on github?
Regards
Aleks
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Willy Tarreau
Gesendet: 14. Jänner 2019 04:11:17 MEZ
An: "Tim Düsterhus"
CC: Lukas Tribus , haproxy
Betreff: Re: h
Hi Willy,
Am 17-01-2019 15:41, schrieb Willy Tarreau:
Hi Aleks,
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 01:02:56PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> Very likely, yes. If you want to inspect the body you simply have to
> enable "option http-buffer-request" so that haproxy waits for the body
&g
Hi Willy.
Am 17.01.2019 um 04:25 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Hi Aleks,
>
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 11:52:12PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>> For service routing are the standard haproxy content routing options possible
>> (path, header, ...) , right?
>
> Yes absolutel
Hi.
Am 16.01.2019 um 19:02 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Hi,
>
> HAProxy 1.9.2 was released on 2019/01/16. It added 58 new commits
> after version 1.9.1.
>
> It addresses a number of lower importance pending issues that were not
> yet merged into 1.9.1, one bug in the cache and fixes some long-standi
Hi.
Am 16.01.2019 um 16:35 schrieb mirko stefanelli:
> Hi to all,
>
> we are trying to move from Apache reverse proxy to Haproxy, you can see below
> a
> part of del file Apache httpd.conf:
>
>
> ServerName dipendenti.xxx.xxx.it
> ErrorLog logs/intranet_ssl_error_log
> TransferLog l
gt; From: Vũ Xuân Học
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2019 10:37 AM
> To: 'Aleksandar Lazic' ; 'haproxy@formilux.org'
> ; 'PiBa-NL'
> Subject: RE: Get client IP
>
> Hi,
>
> I have other problem. I want to only allow some ip access my website.
conf/haproxy-config.template#L180
https://github.com/openshift/router/blob/master/images/router/haproxy/conf/haproxy-config.template#L198
Regards
Aleks
> *From:* Aleksandar Lazic
> *Sent:* Monday, January 14, 2019 8:45 AM
> *To:* haproxy@formilux.org; Vũ Xuân Học ; 'PiBa-NL'
>
the client ip as the setup works in the http config.
Best regards
Aleks
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: "Vũ Xuân Học"
Gesendet: 14. Jänner 2019 02:17:23 MEZ
An: 'PiBa-NL' , 'Aleksandar Lazic' ,
haproxy@formilux.org
Betreff: RE: Get client IP
Thanks
Hi.
Am 13.01.2019 um 12:17 schrieb Vũ Xuân Học:
> Hi,
>
> Please help me to solve this problem.
>
> I use HAProxy version 1.5.18, SSL transparent mode and I can not get client IP
> in my .net mvc website. With mode http, I can use option forwardfor to catch
> client ip but with tcp mode, my web
Am 09.01.2019 um 15:22 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Hi Tim,
>
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 12:58:30PM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
>> Am 09.01.19 um 05:31 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
>>> Except that the "naturally" part here is manually performed by someone,
>>> and an issue tracker is nothing more than an org
Am 29.12.2018 um 19:25 schrieb Valentin Vidic:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 06:03:51PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>> I thought I have misunderstood the Idea behind maglev, thanks for
>> clarification.
>
> Found another mention of Maglev [Eis16] for high-level lo
Am 29.12.2018 um 07:41 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 07:55:11PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>> Well as far as I understood the pdf one of the biggest difference is that
>> Maglev is a distributed system where the consistent hash is for local system.
>
>
Well as far as I understood the pdf one of the biggest difference is that
Maglev is a distributed system where the consistent hash is for local system.
What I think is if consistent hash uses the peers table for balancing it could
be similar to Maglev, but I'm not a algo expert, just an Idea.
I
Hi.
Have anyone take a look into the Maglev algorithm ?
This paper looks very interesting
https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.com/en//pubs/archive/44824.pdf
Regards
Aleks
Hi.
I just have seen this tweet, maybe it's also interesting for you.
Subodh Iyengar (@__subodh) twitterte um 10:18 nachm. on Mi., Dez. 26, 2018:
Slides for my presentation at ACM conext on Facebook's implementation and
deployment of QUIC are now live
https://conferences2.sigcomm.org/co-next/2
prüngliche Nachricht
Von: "UPPALAPATI, PRAVEEN"
Gesendet: 27. Dezember 2018 06:24:43 MEZ
An: Aleksandar Lazic , haproxy
Betreff: RE: Http HealthCheck Issue
Hi Alex,
If I have one vhost representing all the nexus host's how can haproxy identify
which server is down ?
I
Hi Patrick.
Am 26-12-2018 22:26, schrieb Overbey, Patrick (Sioux Falls):
Hello,
First off, I want to say thank you for your hard work on haproxy. It is
a very fine piece of software.
I recently ran into a bug compiling haproxy 1.9+ on AIX 7.1
7100-00-03-1115 using gmake 4.2 and gcc 8.1.0. I
oxy.com/blog/the-four-essential-sections-of-an-haproxy-configuration/
https://www.haproxy.com/blog/introduction-to-haproxy-acls/
In any case please post some logs, configs or anything directly in the mail body
so that the persons which reads this list via a console are able to follow it
without to ope
help you.
haproxy -vv
anonymized config
Regards
Aleks
-Original Message-----
From: Aleksandar Lazic
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 2:00 PM
To: Lance Melancon
Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: HA Proxy Load Balancer
CAUTION: This email originated from outside Cypress-Fairban
Hi Willy.
Am 20-12-2018 10:29, schrieb Willy Tarreau:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 09:17:00AM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
Runtime API Improvements: It would be nice when you add a block that
hanging or
dead processes can also be debugged with this API now. Maybe I have
overseen it.
It is
Hi Lance.
Am 20-12-2018 18:20, schrieb Lance Melancon:
We are testing the load balancer and it's working but I can't see how
to direct the server to a specific website such as server.net/site. Is
this possible? Syntax? Thanks!
Well yes. I think it is a good starting point to read and underst
version, as it's
normally not a big deal to setup a vhost.
Regards
Aleks
PS: What's this urldefense.proofpoint.com crap 8-O
> Please advice.
>
> Thanks,
> Praveen.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Aleksandar Lazic [mailto:al-hapr...@none.at]
> Sent: Wednesday, Dece
Am 20.12.2018 um 06:48 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:31:33PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>>> Well, I know that so quick a summary doesn't do justice to the developers
>>> having done all this amazing work, but I've seen that some of my cowo
Hi.
Am 19.12.2018 um 19:33 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Hi,
>
> HAProxy 1.9.0 was released on 2018/12/19. It added 45 new commits
> after version 1.9-dev11.
>
> We still had a number of small issues causing the various artefacts that
> have been visible on haproxy.org since this week-end, but now ev
Am 19.12.2018 um 21:04 schrieb UPPALAPATI, PRAVEEN:
> Ok then do I need to add the haproxy server?
I suggest to use a `curl -v
/nexus/v1/repository/rawcentral/com.att.swm.attpublic/healthcheck.txt`
and see how curl make the request.
I assume that nexus have a general URL and not srv1,srv2, ...
Fo
Hi Baptiste.
Am 11.12.2018 um 03:29 schrieb Baptiste:
> Hi guys,
>
> At last AWS conference, I met with a engineer who was using HAProxy to
> load-balance IoT devices through HAProxy using MQTT protocol and he was
> complaining about the poor performance of the server with 10k of devices just
> g
Hi Jerome.
Am 07.12.2018 um 15:37 schrieb Jerome Magnin:
> Hi Aleks,
>
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 01:46:53PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>> Hi Jerome.
>> [...]
>> I suggest to use a dedicated function for that, jm2c.
>>
>> { "bc_http_major&qu
Requests/sec: 229817.63
> Transfer/sec: 186.30MB
>
> thanks
>
> - Original Message -
> *From:* "flamese...@yahoo.co.jp"
> *To:* Aleksandar Lazic ; "haproxy@formilux.org"
>
> *Date:* 2018/12/7, Fri 09:06
> *Subject:* R
Hi Jerome.
Am 07.12.2018 um 10:26 schrieb Jerome Magnin:
> Hi,
>
> the attached patch adds bc_http_major. It returns the HTTP major encoding of
> the
> backend connection, based on the the on-wire encoding.
cool Idea ;-)
I suggest to use a dedicated function for that, jm2c.
{ "bc_http_major"
Hi.
Am 06.12.2018 um 15:20 schrieb flamese...@yahoo.co.jp:
> Hi,
>
> I have a haproxy(v1.8.14) in front of several nginx backends, everything works
> fine until I add compression in haproxy.
There is a similar thread about this topic.
https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg31897.h
Am 02.12.2018 um 20:29 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Hi,
>
> HAProxy 1.9-dev9 was released on 2018/12/02. It added 147 new commits
> after version 1.9-dev8.
Image is now updated ;-)
https://hub.docker.com/r/me2digital/haproxy19/
###
HA-Proxy version 1.9-dev9 2018/12/02
Copyright 2000-2018 Willy Tarr
roxy-dconv/1.8/configuration.html#4-server-template
So you would like to have something like this, is this possible, I don't think
so?
backend generic
server-template myserver 1-3 %[req.hdr(X-MyHeader)]:80 check source 0.0.0.0
usesrc %[dst]
Which version of HAProxy do you use?
haproxy -vv
Hi.
Am 14.11.2018 um 08:46 schrieb Vijay Bais:
> Hello,
>
> We have a requirement wherein a single generic backend with server options
> configured as placeholders, which will resolve on the fly or at runtime.
>
> Currently, we have to define multiple backends (has to be hardcoded) and
> select
Hi Fred.
Sorry to be picky but I still think that there is some missing text in the
documentation, as mentioned before.
http://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy.git;a=commitdiff;h=06f5b6435ba99b7a6a034d27b56192e16249f6f0
MINOR: doc: Add information about "early-hint" http-request action.
As I could b
Am 12.11.2018 um 23:31 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 10:52:41PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>> Oh wow this is really a good time to get the hands dirty as QUIC is a major
>> design change in HTTP, IMHO.
>
> Some first approaches were already attempt
Hi Willy.
Am 12.11.2018 um 21:01 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 07:42:21PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>> Even I agree with you to the point that HAProxy should be able to handle this
>> next upcomming/available technology, I'm not sure if it's really
Hi Willy.
Am 12.11.2018 um 21:14 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Hi Aleks,
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 06:00:25PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>> Hi Fred.
>>
>> Am 12.11.2018 um 15:38 schrieb Frederic Lecaille:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Here is a li
let's
discuss it further off the list, if you like.
Regads aleks
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Emmanuel Hocdet
Gesendet: 12. November 2018 18:44:40 MEZ
An: Aleksandar Lazic
CC: haproxy@formilux.org
Betreff: Re: HTTP/3 | daniel.haxx.se
Hi Aleks,
> Le 12 nov. 2018 à
proxy will be able to proxy/load balance
UDP?
> ++
> Manu
>
>> Le 11 nov. 2018 à 20:38, Aleksandar Lazic a écrit :
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> FYI.
>>
>> Oh no, that was quite fast after HTTP/2
>>
>> https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2018/11/11/http-3/
>>
>> Regards
>> Aleks
>>
>
>
Hi Fred.
Am 12.11.2018 um 15:38 schrieb Frederic Lecaille:
> Hello,
>
> Here is a little series of patches to implement a new http-request
> action named "early-hint" to add HTTP 103 responses prior to any other
> response with headers whose values are defined by log-format rules, as
> this is do
Hi.
FYI.
Oh no, that was quite fast after HTTP/2
https://daniel.haxx.se/blog/2018/11/11/http-3/
Regards
Aleks
Hi Vijay.
Am 06.11.2018 um 10:06 schrieb Vijay Bais:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using HAProxy 1.8 as a forward proxy with below configuration
>
>
>
> defaults
> mode tcp
> log global
> option tcplog
> option
Hi.
In the meantime you can use Socklog [1] or fluent-bit [2] to listen to syslog
and write to stdout as I use it in my Image. Pay attention that Fluent-bit
writes by default json format to stdout.
https://gitlab.com/aleks001/haproxy18-centos/blob/master/containerfiles/container-entrypoint.sh#L
Hi Robin.
Am 29.10.2018 um 20:15 schrieb Robin H. Johnson:
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 01:52:29PM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>>> Right now, if you want to use load feedback for weights, you either need
>>> something entirely out-of-band from the servers back to HAProxy, o
Hi.
Am 28.10.2018 um 21:01 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Hi,
>
> HAProxy 1.9-dev5 was released on 2018/10/28. It added 58 new commits
> after version 1.9-dev4.
Image is updated.
https://hub.docker.com/r/me2digital/haproxy19/
##
HA-Proxy version 1.9-dev5 2018/10/28
Copyright 2000-2018 Willy Tarreau
all, there is a direct connection between the client and the
backend node over a public IP ( of the backend node). But, what I don't
understand is, if a connection attempt is made through HAProxy, why would
it allow the connection to be handed off to the backend node directly (
client -> backend
Hi Robin.
Am 26.10.2018 um 20:49 schrieb Robin H. Johnson:
> Hi,
>
> This is something I have a vague recollection of existing somewhere, but
> didn't find any leads in documentation or source.
>
> Right now, if you want to use load feedback for weights, you either need
> something entirely out-
. How you
> do
> that depends on the backend app you are using but most of them
> like apache2, tomcat etc. have specific configs that you can
> find in their documentation. For example if your backend is
>
h a silly question.
No probs.
Finally you fixed it.
> Cheers!
Regards
Aleks
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 12:21 AM Aleksandar Lazic <mailto:al-hapr...@none.at>> wrote:
>
> Am 24.10.2018 um 09:18 schrieb Igor Cicimov:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 24 Oct
Am 26.10.2018 um 18:10 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 05:58:43PM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>> BTW what's nb in "nb(thread|proc)"?
>>
>> [ ] No block
>> [ ] never been
>> [ ] real answer, something in french ;-):
>
> &
Hi, William.
Am 26.10.2018 um 17:41 schrieb William Lallemand:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 05:13:00PM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>> Hi William.
>>
>> Sorry for my lack of knowledge and my curiosity, you know I'm always curious
>> ;-), but for which usecase ca
Hi William.
Sorry for my lack of knowledge and my curiosity, you know I'm always curious
;-), but for which usecase can I use this feature?
Best regards.
Aleks
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: William Lallemand
Gesendet: 26. Oktober 2018 14:47:28 MESZ
An: haproxy@formilux.org
C
501 - 600 of 1095 matches
Mail list logo