Thanks Greg!
I am planning to list down the summary of all the abends captured in Abend-
aid during a particular time period. Using the first JCL you have provided , I
tried to list down the abends with PRINT PROGRAM=*. However this is listing
the detailed report for each abend. Do you know the
Cwi,
what makes you think that the structure was filled 85% The number you point
to (the report is completely unreadable to me, even after reformatting to a
fixed-font) is the number right after *ALL in the CF activity report, right?
That would be %CF Util. Take a look at the RMF help
Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:715260175-1215667394-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-5043
[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Roland, I hate to say this, maybe I'm not clear, but what are you
saying?
our private size on z/OS R9 below is
(MXI VMAP command, IPLINFO from Mark
Cwi Jeret [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hello Forum,
Yesteday, due to a failing receiver from MQ we got an overflow
of the MQ Structure holding the Queue of CAQMCSQMSTR1.
We saw in RMF3 the following for Structure CAQMCSQMSTR1 :
Ted,
I wrote our private region below the line is about 10M.
Was it to difficult to understand?
Roland
Roland, I hate to say this, maybe I'm not clear, but what are you saying?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
Hi all,
I try to delete a dataset ssmd.testhsm1 which already in MIGRAT1 level 1
but failed because there is no backup copy for this dataset (the backup copy
is purged).
The question is how to delete this entry from catalog with MIGRAT1 status???
SSMD.ZSMD137.TESTHSM1
Have you tried the following TSO command :
DEL 'SSMD.ZSMD137.TESTHSM1' NOSCRATCH
Rob Scott
Rocket Software, Inc
275 Grove Street
Newton, MA 02466
617-614-2305
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Tommy Tsui
before nscr...I have to delete the entry from MCDS with fixcds d 'dsname'
delete
On 7/10/08, Tommy Tsui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I try..it works .thanks..
On 7/10/08, Rob Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you tried the following TSO command :
DEL 'SSMD.ZSMD137.TESTHSM1' NOSCRATCH
Roland Schiradin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Ted,
I wrote our private region below the line is about 10M.
Was it to difficult to understand?
Roland
Well, that text did not make the newsgroup.
What I read is:
Quote:
John,
our private size on z/OS
Thanks Ed! That was just the detail needed. I contacted Tom Brennan and he
told me how to fix Vista so that it returns the current code page translation
to the host.
Vista V1.24 will return 037 by default unless you tell it otherwise. (In Vista
V1.26 the default is the opposite).
In Vista
I seem to recall you need to be connected to RACF group ARCCATGP to be
able to do this for migrated datasets ( but may well be wrong )
Paul
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rob Scott
Sent: 10 July 2008 09:08
To:
No, we don't have the ABR piece.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
I really think I'm trying to make this more complicated than it is, but Barry's
idea wasn't what I was looking for either. I'm not looking for a listing of
the
incoming datasets for any other reason than to know what to print out each
day. The print I'm looking for is the internals of all the
If you are z/OS V1.9 then you could look at using REXX and SDSF to review
the SYSOUT while it is on Spool, Then create a file with REXX that lists
the sysouts you want to print?
Or create a last step with REXX to create a GDG that is collected later with
the information you need?
Perhaps a more
Hi Jim,
I have watched the thread with interest and if I understand the requirement
correctly it is to produce a single printed output from multiple listings
exported from Control-M in to sequential data sets with consistent DCB
attributes, i.e. RECFM, LRECL etc.
If this assessment is correct
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yukus, Mary J CIV USMEPCOM
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 6:55 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SFTP GET COMMAND QUESTION
Thanks, these look like good possibilities.
I got some
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 08:22:52 -0500, Mark Zelden
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I obviously agree (I think you were commenting on my post when you wrote
very similar sharing here), but it is far from iron-clad. For example,
RESERVE won't keep 2 people from updating the same PDS (or PDS member)
from
ISP.SISPLPA for instance can be in link list and has some big modules
that are still RM 24.
I use the following usermod:
++USERMOD(name)
/* MOVE LOAD MODULES FROM SISPLPA TO SISPLOAD */
.
In a message dated 7/9/2008 4:50:06 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Looks like a bit of do as I say, not as I do.
It's been my experience that it's much better to do as they say. New
applications should exploit storage above the bar as much as possible, IMHO.
We are for someone to do some porting work to z/OS on a contract
basis: porting C code, packaging (not SMP/E), RACF, ICSF integration.
This is a several-month gig with possibly more work to follow, and
would be telecommuting.
If you think you might be this person, please send a résumé to this
Sorry, Shaja, I do not. That's all I can find on that utility.
Compuware support is usually very helpful with these kinds of
questions...
Good luck,
Greg
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Shaja Radhangan
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 1:38 AM
I am
Also here is the output of D UNI,ALL in case that means something. I've looked
but not found anything yet in the docs.
D UNI,ALL
CUN3000I 15.55.29 UNI DISPLAY 916
ENVIRONMENT: CREATED
Pat,
I absolutely agree with your first statement below. I'm not sure I
agree with the second half. My point was that there would most likely
have been much less programming effort if they had decided to just make
the required changes to the application to fulfill the law changes,
leaving the
Is it possible that Lindy needs to add translation tables to ISPF? I see that
ISPF supports SWISS, GERMAN, FRENCH and English. But if you want a different
lanaguage, like Swedish, would you need a new translation table added to ISPF?
3.10.3 Adding Translation Tables for Extended Code Page
Knutson, Sam wrote:
If your below the line private area decreased it I will step out on a
limb and say no one is monitoring and managing it. We have been able to
grow PVT from a standard 9M to 10M and EPVT as well in the last few
years. IBM is doing good work in the area of Virtual Storage
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex R.
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 9:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: South Dakota migrates off mainframe; chaos ensues
Pat,
I absolutely agree with your first
Your tests confirm what I said last night, although we have yet to hear from
the original poster. I'm glad you were able to run tests with the server
configured both ways, and willing to take the time.
Bill
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:49:52 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
-Original Message-
In a message dated 7/10/2008 9:54:58 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
where somebody might say, gee, why not spend $c $a+$b to develop the
software on the new platform? This question needs to be answered in
management speak and not techie speak. And the only reason
For those of you looking for v1.7...Here it is:
Area Start EndSize(K)%UseOverflow
Size(Mb)
Extended Private 14C0 7FFF 1757184K
1716Mb
Extended CSA 0567A000 14BF 251416K 27
246Mb
Extended MLPA 0K
Extended
snip
Can SYS1.STGINDEX (VIO journaling) have secondary allocations?
/snip
AFAIK, No.
BTW Why are you still doing VIO at all?
It made a lot of sense when disk access times were 17-30 ms, but not
with 3-4ms (Escon/Cache) or 1 ms (FICON/Cache)
When I found that we were doing a CLPA at every
Jim,
if I understand correctly you want to do pattern matching (regular
expressions) against some strings that your program extracts from some
dataset?
If you can use C as programming language then there is a string function
call fnmatch() that provides pattern matching as in Unix shell
Knutson, Sam wrote:
If your below the line private area decreased it I will step out on a
limb and say no one is monitoring and managing it. We have been able to
grow PVT from a standard 9M to 10M and EPVT as well in the last few
years. IBM is doing good work in the area of Virtual Storage
Just wanted to point out a few articles I've come
across lately that you might want to point out to
your management.
I found them all in publications I subscribe to, but
I imagine they're all avaiable online.
1. Wall Street Journal, June 18, page B2
China Embraces Old-School Business Guru
It's been my experience that it's much better to do as they say. New
applications should exploit storage above the bar as much as possible, IMHO.
I agree with that point of view; I wish IBM would do as they say!
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
years. IBM is doing good work in the area of Virtual Storage Constraint
Relief (VSCR).
I would agree that this is an installation problem.
I disagree to the extent that IBM should not be putting new code below the line.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
I haven't seen any evidence in this thread that leads me to believe they have
put any new code below the line.
Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/10/2008 12:38 PM
I disagree to the extent that IBM should not be putting new code below the line.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
Note that my
I haven't seen any evidence in this thread that leads me to believe they have
put any new code below the line.
Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/10/2008 12:38 PM
I disagree to the extent that IBM should not be putting new code below the
line.
The very first post was on that very topic.
And, so
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:19:46 +, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
I haven't seen any evidence in this thread that leads me to believe they
have put any new code below the line.
Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/10/2008 12:38 PM
I disagree to the extent that IBM should not be putting new code below
the
Neither qualify as evidence. A statement in an ETR from the CICS group is
hardly proof that any new code resides below the line.
The OP needs to look very carefully at his LPA list and other system parameters
to determine what caused the change. It may be as simple as having the FLMMOVE
Thanks to all for the input. I recruited a co-worker with Rexx experience and
John McKown's idea does work to fit our needs. The one question my
co-worker had was if there might even be other utilities that might not require
like DCB's.
Rick Fochtman wrote:
snip
I hate to rain on anyone's parade, but all the posts notwithstanding,
the problem here isn't failure, but the fear that it might actually
succeed.
If the project is as doomed to failure as many have been
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of SUBSCRIBE IBM-MAIN Jim
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 1:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: wildcard utilities
Thanks to all for the input. I recruited a co-worker with
Rexx
This question is for users of Control-M (Scheduler)
I would like to set a user-defined variable to be used in the JCL of a
job submitted by Control-M(CTM).
So if I specify %%VAR1=job list what I get is the first full word
(job) not the full text of (job list).
If I use %%VAR1=job_list I
Tom Marchant wrote:
I don't think anyone mentioned yet to check the location of SWA and the UCBs.
UCBs yes. SWA no. SWA is private area ... not common.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL
UCBs yes. SWA no. SWA is private area ... not common.
Hopefully, if they were above the line, they'd stay there and not be regressed
just because they're going to a new release.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For
I found this hard to believe, so I checked with the person responsible
for monitoring virtual storage constraints, who happens to be in my
department and whose office is two from mine. While he does not have
numbers from as long ago as OS/390 R10 (and I don't, either), we would
both be
IBM appears to be expanding use of storage below the 16M line,
rather than converting their own code to 31-bit addressability. Here is
the reply I received when I ETR asked CICS why I could no longer get a
certain DSALIM value in TS22 after going to zos 1.08.
There is
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:55:27 -0500, Laine, Rogers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This question is for users of Control-M (Scheduler)
I would like to set a user-defined variable to be used in the JCL of a
job submitted by Control-M(CTM).
So if I specify %%VAR1=job list what I get is the first
Hi,
I just got a 2nd letter (I don't recall getting the 1st, when was it
sent ?) stating that 3.5 is going off support 9/2008. Has anyone
migrated to R11 ? I understand there's a DB involved now. I haven't
cracked open the books yet but is the DB going to affect the overall
function of the
I had heard about the requirement to go to R11, so I ordered it about
8-9 months ago and tried to install it. It was a TOTAL piece of junk
(numerous abends and MANY PTF's needing to be installed). CA finally
told me to install the latest PTF tape, and that would fix all of the
problems. But the
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
-Original Message-
From: Burrell, C. Todd (CDC/OCOO/ITSO) (CTR) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:59:03
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CA Jobtrac 3.5 Off Support
I had heard about the requirement to go to R11, so I
Sorry about the previous post -- fat fingers!
I'd rather run 3.5 unsupported than to try and install PTF's every day to fix
problems in production.
Welcome to the new CA - same as the old CA.
And, people wonder why I still complain (b*tch) about them.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
We converted to r11 at the beginning of this year. The conversion was a
challenge because of the Datacom database and RACF security setup.
We had several small problems that we were able to work-around until CA
provided fixes.
We also had a major problem that had to be fixed ASAP (i.e., Fix
I have a production job down due to an S413 abend on a VTS (virtual) tape data
set.
I was wondering if this is a hardware problem or if there is something I can do
to fix the tape. I have no additional error messages other than the EQC.
Can a back end copy be used to recover the dataset?
..we are working on R11 rat now...still a maintenance nightmare...anyone
running V3.5 with z/IS V1R9?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Waldman
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 1:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
Most errors that I have seen on virtual tape that would make sense only
on a physical tape were due to the VTS not being able to restage the
virtual volume back to the TVC (e.g. stacked volume stuck in drive)
-Original Message-
Lizette Koehler
I have a production job down due to an S413
So does that mean I need to be my CE out here?
Lizette
Most errors that I have seen on virtual tape that would make sense only
on a physical tape were due to the VTS not being able to restage the
virtual volume back to the TVC (e.g. stacked volume stuck in drive)
-Original Message-
There should be an intervention on the LM.
Or you could open the door and look, if it's stuck you might be able to
get it out yourself.
Or find the physical volume the logical volume is on and make sure it is
available in the library.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
I had to include mainframe in the subject to keep this On Topic. :-)
IBM has a bunch of newsgroups at news://news.software.ibm.com.
Some of them (like the CommServer groups) have no other similar
fora (listservers, etc.) My employer blocks NNTP connections so
I have to use newsreader-to-http
Lizette Koehler wrote:
So does that mean I need to be my CE out here?
Lizette
I think the last time we had an EQC on a virtual tape,
the gripper on one hand had broken. If there has been
some kind of back-end hardware problem, I think it should
have called home. If you look on the display
I once found a CICS program that would display the USERID and USER Name af
everyone signed into a CICS region. Does anyone recall where that program
exists? I was thinking it was in one of the Command-level books, but
cannot find it now. If anyone remembers or knows of one please email me.
2008/7/10 Patrick O'Keefe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I had to include mainframe in the subject to keep this On Topic. :-)
IBM has a bunch of newsgroups at news://news.software.ibm.com.
Some of them (like the CommServer groups) have no other similar
fora (listservers, etc.) My employer blocks NNTP
My contingency is to have a base 1.9 install in a sandbox LPAR. If we
have a problem, I'll attempt to reproduce it in that LPAR to get support.
We are in the last year of a MANY year project to get off the
mainframe. We are supposed to revoke most logins 12/31 and power down
6/30/09. (I
A bit late on this, was sunning and funning, am I allowed to do this
unemployed? But really, I totally agree with these sentiments. While I didn't
like working myself out of a job just before the outsourcing I figured I might
as well make it work, it kept me busy, and in the end I felt true to
All this wonderful news ! I can't believe they won't push this off since there
are so many major problems.
I was told by CA that 3.5 SP7 would run fine with 1.9. We'll see we're getting
ready to start testing.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
I will be out of the office starting 07/10/2008 and will not return until
07/14/2008.
I will respond to your message when I return.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
I worked with my CE on this. IBM Tucson dialed into the VTS and was able to
reset the error flags and put the tape in READ status. I can now access the
files on the back end (physical) tape. The CE physically inspected the tape
and it was okay. So we figure it must be some sort of other
Have you had any microcode put on the VTS lately?
Lizette Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I worked with my CE on this. IBM
Tucson dialed into the VTS and was able to reset the error flags and put the
tape in READ status. I can now access the files on the back end (physical)
tape. The CE
If someone knows where I should ask this question, please tell me where to
go. ;)
Otherwise...
I was chatting with the manager of the tech support group at another company
and he was telling me that in his shop they experience a terrible slowdown
in WebSphere most afternoons; sucks the life
- Original Message -
From: Burrell, C. Todd , CDC/OCOO/ITSO, CTR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 3:59 PM
Subject: Re: CA Jobtrac 3.5 Off Support
I had heard about the requirement to go to R11, so I ordered it about
8-9 months ago and
Hi Gary,
We had a similar problem back at my last place and *sucks the life out of the
machine* is about right.
Sounds like it could be a storage leak/creep within the heap that is causing
the Java heap to go into more frequent garbage collections, especially if the
heap is lightly
71 matches
Mail list logo
