I don't see any issue with a company wanting custom work done on the
project as long as it doesn't contradict the goals of the project.
For example, a company might want to pay more to improve particular
hardware drivers, is that really a problem?
Consulting could be a good way to raise funds
Gareth Nelson wrote:
> I don't see any issue with a company wanting custom work done on the
> project as long as it doesn't contradict the goals of the project.
>
> For example, a company might want to pay more to improve particular
> hardware drivers, is that really a problem?
>
> Consulting
> I don't see any issue with a company wanting custom work done on the
> project as long as it doesn't contradict the goals of the project.
>
> For example, a company might want to pay more to improve particular
> hardware drivers, is that really a problem?
>
> Consulting could be a good way to
> Consulting could be a good way to raise funds for the project while also
> encouraging usage.
Obviously all the developers should add additional consulting gigs on
the side, to improve freeload.
Unfortunately our software to add additional hours to the day isn't
finished yet, because most of
> How about a series of 'Corporate' CDs, with a sliding scale of prices,
> incrementing on a traditional per user/account/cpu/etc basis?
>
> Management & purchasing people are accustomed to this.
[ ... ]
I (only my personal opinion) think this contradicts with the main goal
(Free) of the
On 2015-12-01 Tue 22:08 PM |, Marko Cupa?? wrote:
>
> But I work for a company whose networking relies heavily on
> OpenBSD. My boss, although not from FOSS world, understands the value
> of good software, so I managed to persuade him to approve purchase of
> CD set every release. He also
I have no clue what a hackathon costs, any ballpark averages?
Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Verizon Wireless 4G LTE network.
Original Message
From: Theo de Raadt
Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2015 11:11 AM
To: Donald Allen
Cc: Theo de Raadt; misc; Richard Thornton
Subject: Re: A
> But if we lose the project leader due to lack of exercise and food,
> that's not good for the project. You made it very clear in a previous
> message to this thread that no Foundation money comes to you. So while
> the Foundation may be doing good things with their money, we, the
> community,
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> But if we lose the project leader due to lack of exercise and food,
>> that's not good for the project. You made it very clear in a previous
>> message to this thread that no Foundation money comes to you. So while
> I have no clue what a hackathon costs, any ballpark averages?
http://www.openbsdfoundation.org/financials/2014/IncomeStatement2014.txt
http://www.openbsdfoundation.org/financials/2013/IncomeStatement2013.txt
These reports can be compared against http://www.openbsd.org/hackathons.html
to find
On 2015-12-02 16:21, Theo de Raadt wrote:
I have no clue what a hackathon costs, any ballpark averages?
http://www.openbsdfoundation.org/financials/2014/IncomeStatement2014.txt
http://www.openbsdfoundation.org/financials/2013/IncomeStatement2013.txt
These reports can be compared against
dera...@openbsd.org (Theo de Raadt), 2015.12.02 (Wed) 02:18 (CET):
> >I don't think that quite covers it. Those of us who have the choice
> >can send checks or Paypal money directly to Theo, as described on the
> >Donations page. I think checks are preferable, because they eliminate
> >Paypal
I don't think it should be the contributors who should choose directly to who
the money is "attributed".
That being exactly the role of the foundation, in my opinion.
But maybe :
- the foundation could take into account the time given by each dev
- the devs could have their own votes in regards
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>>"All I can do is buy the CD's and give some $ to the
>>foundation. Any other suggestion is not productive."
>>
>>I don't think that quite covers it. Those of us who have the choice
>>can send checks or Paypal money
Personally, I don't have the resources to contribute any amount
of money. Unix admin's job here in Serbia is paid in high 4 figures :)
Yearly, that's right.
But I work for a company whose networking relies heavily on
OpenBSD. My boss, although not from FOSS world, understands the value
of good
On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 18:41:24 -0200
Michel Behr wrote:
> Just one more thing: for non-developers, if you think there's any
> sense in this idea I just described, please, some "seconding" and/or
> additions would be welcomed. Also some e-mails directed to
>
"All I can do is buy the CD's and give some $ to the
foundation. Any other suggestion is not productive."
I don't think that quite covers it. Those of us who have the choice
can send checks or Paypal money directly to Theo, as described on the
Donations page. I think checks are preferable,
As I understand, one of the reasons for the Foundation to avoid targeted
contributions is to preserve the independence of the project - in the
current model they are accountable for allocating the resources as they see
fit. So IMHO there is value in that model for that regard. On the other
hand,
Just one more thing: for non-developers, if you think there's any sense in
this idea I just described, please, some "seconding" and/or additions would
be welcomed. Also some e-mails directed to fundrais...@openbsdfoundation.org
would be great in this regard too. (Again: OpenBSD developers should
>"All I can do is buy the CD's and give some $ to the
>foundation. Any other suggestion is not productive."
>
>I don't think that quite covers it. Those of us who have the choice
>can send checks or Paypal money directly to Theo, as described on the
>Donations page. I think checks are preferable,
> > Now to be clear Theo, are donation via the paypal on the donations page
> > are directly to you and you can do as you see fit, and/or only checks
> > would be best?
>
> Correct, as I see fit. I try to use it for the Project for things the
> Foundation doesn't fund. I declared it that way
> > > Now to be clear Theo, are donation via the paypal on the donations page
> > > are directly to you and you can do as you see fit, and/or only checks
> > > would be best?
> >
> > Correct, as I see fit. I try to use it for the Project for things the
> > Foundation doesn't fund. I declared
Theo: like others in this thread I find it quite shocking and disappointing
how poorly you are doing financially from your hard work.
I apologise if this is too obvious a suggestion but if the foundation is
making a sufficient income is it not possible for you to draw a salary as
an employee?
As
> Theo: like others in this thread I find it quite shocking and disappointing
> how poorly you are doing financially from your hard work.
Join the club :)
> I apologise if this is too obvious a suggestion but if the foundation is
> making a sufficient income is it not possible for you to draw a
On 12/01/15 10:20, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On 30 Nov 2015, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
>> Let's not waste any more of Theo's time. USB sticks are not the magic
>> device that some seem to think. Some are not very reliable and prone to
>> failure. I've had very mixed results with budget USB sticks in
On 30 Nov 2015, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
> Let's not waste any more of Theo's time. USB sticks are not the magic
> device that some seem to think. Some are not very reliable and prone to
> failure. I've had very mixed results with budget USB sticks in
> particular. Going with a more expensive USB
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 08:31:54PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2015-11-30, Tati Chevron wrote:
in my case, a USB stick would be actually useful for installing machines
-- unlike the CD sets (I haven't had a working optical drive in the last
5+ years). Any chance for
> Software development. :D
>
> More importantly, what can users do to make it easier for developers to
> write code? That is the important question to ask when a thought like this
> comes up. Is it more efficient of developer time for me to purchase my own
> usb stick and deal with it myself,
Em 30-11-2015 19:34, Theo de Raadt escreveu:
> These days the CD revenue is about what a cashier at a store makes.
This is truly sad, to not say tragical.
>
> It seems to keep shrinking, but I will try to keep doing it unless it
> nears zero; at which point the artwork will stop also.
>
> I'm
Theo de Raadt writes:
> I don't know, but I'll think about it later, because I am busy.
> I am spending my day making a non-writeable USB stick for the OP.
That's nice. Although a simple 'no' would have sufficed of course. I
have been told that buying CD sets is useful
> >>(Making them unconditionally read-only would be probably a good thing,
> >>too.)
> >
> > This, too, I see a value in.
>
> And who is going to trust this? There's a significantly higher bar
> to invisibly tampering with a pressed and printed CD than a USB stick.
> (Also it kind-of makes the
Em 30-11-2015 19:03, Tati Chevron escreveu:
> Again, the original idea wasn't mine. I commented on the thread, but in
> my mind, I imagined receiving the install source on a medium that had the
> same bar to tampering as a CD, such as masked rom. I wasn't thinking of
> a standard USB flash
> >> I would buy an official release on USB or preferably sd card, if it
> >> was on offer. Presumably the production costs would be less as well.
> >
> >Cloning CDs from a master is something that can be farmed out
> >relatively easily. Writing an image to USB/SD, not so much, especially
> >when
> Em 30-11-2015 19:03, Tati Chevron escreveu:
> > Again, the original idea wasn't mine. I commented on the thread, but in
> > my mind, I imagined receiving the install source on a medium that had the
> > same bar to tampering as a CD, such as masked rom. I wasn't thinking of
> > a standard USB
Hi,
in my case, a USB stick would be actually useful for installing machines
-- unlike the CD sets (I haven't had a working optical drive in the last
5+ years). Any chance for 5.9? (Making them unconditionally read-only
would be probably a good thing, too.)
M.
--
id' Ash = Ash; id' Dust =
I suspect the answer is that this falls into the category of too
expensive/distracting to bother, based on the overall benefit.
I find that having a DVD reader/writer in an external USB-connected
enclosure works well for optical-diskless machines.
Devin
in my case, a USB stick would be actually useful for installing machines
-- unlike the CD sets (I haven't had a working optical drive in the last
5+ years). Any chance for 5.9?
I would buy an official release on USB or preferably sd card, if it was on
offer. Presumably the production costs
> I would buy an official release on USB or preferably sd card, if it
> was on offer. Presumably the production costs would be less as well.
^
How do you figure that?
We put everything on the internet. Thousands upon
Software development. :D
More importantly, what can users do to make it easier for developers to
write code? That is the important question to ask when a thought like this
comes up. Is it more efficient of developer time for me to purchase my own
usb stick and deal with it myself, or request
On 2015-11-30, Tati Chevron wrote:
>>in my case, a USB stick would be actually useful for installing machines
>>-- unlike the CD sets (I haven't had a working optical drive in the last
>>5+ years). Any chance for 5.9?
>
> I would buy an official release on USB or preferably
On 11/30/15 8:43 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> On Nov 30, 2015, at 2:34 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>>>
>>> These days the CD revenue is about what a cashier at a store makes.
>
> Uncertain of the veracity of this site,
>
>
>> Em 30-11-2015 19:03, Tati Chevron escreveu:
>> > Again, the original idea wasn't mine. I commented on the thread,
>> but in
>> > my mind, I imagined receiving the install source on a medium that
>> had the
>> > same bar to tampering as a CD, such as masked rom. I wasn't
>> thinking of
>> > a
Let's not waste any more of Theo's time. USB sticks are not the magic
device that some seem to think. Some are not very reliable and prone to
failure. I've had very mixed results with budget USB sticks in
particular. Going with a more expensive USB stick like a major brand
name *usually* turns out
On 01/12/15 10:40, Petr Ročkai wrote:
> Theo de Raadt writes:
>> I don't know, but I'll think about it later, because I am busy.
>> I am spending my day making a non-writeable USB stick for the OP.
> That's nice. Although a simple 'no' would have sufficed of course. I
>
On Nov 30, 2015, at 2:34 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> These days the CD revenue is about what a cashier at a store makes.
I'm sick to my stomack when I read this. I won't get into how unjust, unfair,
unethical this situation is, we all know that life is unfair. We
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 06:20:02PM -0700, Bal??zs Nagy wrote:
> On Nov 30, 2015, at 2:34 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >
> > These days the CD revenue is about what a cashier at a store makes.
>
> I'm sick to my stomack when I read this. I won't get into how unjust,
>
> On Nov 30, 2015, at 2:34 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >
> > These days the CD revenue is about what a cashier at a store makes.
Uncertain of the veracity of this site,
http://www.payscale.com/research/CA/Job=Cashier/Hourly_Rate/725daaa6/Entry-Level-Calgary-AB
I was
Em 30-11-2015 20:10, Bryan Vyhmeister escreveu:
> Let's not waste any more of Theo's time. USB sticks are not the magic
> device that some seem to think. Some are not very reliable and prone to
> failure. I've had very mixed results with budget USB sticks in
> particular. Going with a more
> Em 30-11-2015 20:10, Bryan Vyhmeister escreveu:
> > Let's not waste any more of Theo's time. USB sticks are not the magic
> > device that some seem to think. Some are not very reliable and prone to
> > failure. I've had very mixed results with budget USB sticks in
> > particular. Going with a
Em 30-11-2015 21:56, Theo de Raadt escreveu:
> But that model does not help me. Please don't give out the impression
> that it does. The dwindling effectiveness of the CD sales support
> model is a bit of a worry.
Sorry for creating that impression. It surely wasn't my intention. Now
you made it
> The good news if any, is that Gifts are tax free in Canada, so that part
> is helpful and users should fell they get more out of their money freely
> given as a gift.
>
> http://www.taxtips.ca/personaltax/giftsandinheritances.htm
Correct, but be careful it will not be interpreted later as a
The reality is obvious - most users of open source are pure unadulterated free
loaders. Nobody pays but we all use it.
That includes very large corporations as well. Torvalds solved it the old
fashioned way; he is an employee of his own foundation. McKusick sells
training videos. All I can
52 matches
Mail list logo