On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 01:28:28AM -0400, Paul M Foster wrote:
> Folks:
>
> I'm running OpenSMTPD 6.8.0p2-4+b4 on Debian 12. Here's my config:
>
> ---
> # $OpenBSD: smtpd.conf,v 1.10 2018/05/24 11:40:17 gilles Exp $
>
> # This is the smtpd server system-wide configuration file.
> # See
On 5/27/24 4:59 AM, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
May 27, 2024 2:53 AM, "Ian Darwin" wrote:
On 5/26/24 8:45 PM, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
May 27, 2024 12:41 AM, "Ian Darwin" wrote:
On 5/26/24 5:40 PM, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
May 26, 2024 9:46 PM, "Ian Darwin" wrote:
I'd like to use the fcrdns
May 27, 2024 2:53 AM, "Ian Darwin" wrote:
> On 5/26/24 8:45 PM, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
>
>> May 27, 2024 12:41 AM, "Ian Darwin" wrote:
>>> On 5/26/24 5:40 PM, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
May 26, 2024 9:46 PM, "Ian Darwin" wrote:
> I'd like to use the fcrdns filter but one of my users
On 5/26/24 8:45 PM, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
May 27, 2024 12:41 AM, "Ian Darwin" wrote:
On 5/26/24 5:40 PM,gil...@poolp.org wrote:
May 26, 2024 9:46 PM, "Ian Darwin" wrote:
I'd like to use the fcrdns filter but one of my users has a non-negotiable need
to get mail from a
site with inept
May 27, 2024 12:41 AM, "Ian Darwin" wrote:
> On 5/26/24 5:40 PM, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
>
>> May 26, 2024 9:46 PM, "Ian Darwin" wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like to use the fcrdns filter but one of my users has a non-negotiable
>>> need to get mail from a
>>> site with inept administration. Is there a
On 5/26/24 5:40 PM, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
May 26, 2024 9:46 PM, "Ian Darwin" wrote:
I'd like to use the fcrdns filter but one of my users has a non-negotiable need
to get mail from a
site with inept administration. Is there a way to let this one site bypass this
one filter?
I have two
May 26, 2024 9:46 PM, "Ian Darwin" wrote:
> I'd like to use the fcrdns filter but one of my users has a non-negotiable
> need to get mail from a
> site with inept administration. Is there a way to let this one site bypass
> this one filter?
>
> I have two fairly standard 'listen' clauses and
On Tue, 14 May 2024 11:41:54 +0100,
Jesper Wallin wrote:
>
> ps, while writing this mail, satanist on IRC suggested the workaround
> of adding 'rcpt-to ', which might invalidate my
> suggestion/patch... Still, I find the mailing list expansion error more
> confusing than helpful.
I use rcpt-to
On 2024/05/13 09:38:40 +0200, Philipp wrote:
> Hi
>
> Sorry, this mail was overseen.
Yeah, sorry.
> [2022-08-30 13:23] "Tobias Fiebig"
> > I just started to see some DoS issue on my OpenSMTPd with table-mysql as
> > the backend. Specifically, my server ran into the user lookup process
> >
On 2024/05/11 14:35:09 +0200, Thomas Bohl wrote:
> > I am on OpenBSD 7.5-current playing around a bit and noticed that
> > smtpd fails to start.
>
> > I then ran smtpd -d and I get:
> > credentials[40067]: warn: table-api: imsg_get: Result too large
> > lookup: table-proc: no services registered
Hi
Sorry, this mail was overseen.
[2022-08-30 13:23] "Tobias Fiebig"
> I just started to see some DoS issue on my OpenSMTPd with table-mysql as the
> backend. Specifically, my server ran into the user lookup process eating a
> full core and torturing the mysql
> server after some funny
I am on OpenBSD 7.5-current playing around a bit and noticed that
smtpd fails to start.
I then ran smtpd -d and I get:
credentials[40067]: warn: table-api: imsg_get: Result too large
lookup: table-proc: no services registered
smtpd: process lka socket closed
Probably the beginning of API
I've found a workaround and narrowed down the source of the problem by using
tables for src and helo-src (the latter of which proved unnecessary and
irrelevant). It turns out that in this line:
action "relayext" relay host src smtp-ext.domain.com helo
smtp.domain.com pki "smtp.domain.com" ca
On 2024-05-06 10:39, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
May 5, 2024 11:34 PM, "J Doe" wrote:
On 2024-05-05 17:26, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
May 5, 2024 11:18 PM, "J Doe" wrote:
Hello,
Hello,
I am using the Senderscore OpenSMTPD filter from packages on OpenBSD
7.5. All packages installed are
May 5, 2024 11:34 PM, "J Doe" wrote:
> On 2024-05-05 17:26, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
>
>> May 5, 2024 11:18 PM, "J Doe" wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>> I am using the Senderscore OpenSMTPD filter from packages on OpenBSD
>>> 7.5. All packages installed are up-to-date.
>>>
>>> In my
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 12:18:04PM +0200, Philipp wrote:
> Hi
Hi, sorry about the delay.
> [2024-04-16 16:44] "James J. Lippard"
> > I run dual-stack IPv6/IPv4 networks, including mail servers. On occasion
> > I may not have IPv6 connectivity, but have IPv4 connectivity. When that
> > happens,
On 2024-05-05 17:26, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
May 5, 2024 11:18 PM, "J Doe" wrote:
Hello,
Hello,
I am using the Senderscore OpenSMTPD filter from packages on OpenBSD
7.5. All packages installed are up-to-date.
In my mail server logs I noticed:
May 4 20:12:44 server smtpd[58189]:
May 5, 2024 11:18 PM, "J Doe" wrote:
> Hello,
>
Hello,
> I am using the Senderscore OpenSMTPD filter from packages on OpenBSD
> 7.5. All packages installed are up-to-date.
>
> In my mail server logs I noticed:
>
> May 4 20:12:44 server smtpd[58189]: check_senderscore:
> link-connect
Thanks for all your work on this project.
e.
On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 02:38:16PM +, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
Hello misc@,
The mailing list software, mlmmj, has been upgraded to its latest version.
I'd appreciate a couple answers to this mail to make sure it does not introduce
a
And I received yours which got propagated through the list, upgrade successful.
Sorry for the noise !
May 2, 2024 4:50 PM, "Chris Brannon" wrote:
> gil...@poolp.org writes:
>
>> I'd appreciate a couple answers to this mail to make sure it does not
>> introduce a regression ;-)
>
> I received
Looks good
02.05.2024 16:38:51 gil...@poolp.org:
> Hello misc@,
>
> The mailing list software, mlmmj, has been upgraded to its latest version.
>
> I'd appreciate a couple answers to this mail to make sure it does not
> introduce a regression ;-)
>
> Gilles
gil...@poolp.org writes:
> I'd appreciate a couple answers to this mail to make sure it does not
> introduce a regression ;-)
I received your message.
-- Chris
On 19/4/24 08:54, Stuart Longland wrote:
stuff not relevant to the OpenSMTPD list
Apologies for the noise… auto-complete in the email client picked out
the wrong email address and I blindly trusted it without checking the
address properly.
Problem Exists Between Keyboard And Chair.
--
On 16/4/24 04:45, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 08:38:51PM +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 08:29:21AM +0200, aliyu...@tutanota.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently trying to install OpenBSD on my laptop, and I'm coming
across a problem. The installation
Hi
[2024-04-16 16:44] "James J. Lippard"
> I run dual-stack IPv6/IPv4 networks, including mail servers. On occasion
> I may not have IPv6 connectivity, but have IPv4 connectivity. When that
> happens, I find that my mail queue accumulates mail that arrives over
> IPv6, but cannot be sent out on
On Wednesday, April 17th, 2024 at 11:51, Philipp wrote:
[...]
>
> Looking at the new trace I see the reason[0] for the error. Other then
> I supected it's the body seperator, which does in your case start with
> a WSP. A wild guess is that the boundery parameter of the working mails
> contain
Hi,
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 13:18:47 +0200,
Philipp wrote:
>
> There was a bug in the code which mixed the byteorder of the port. This
> is fixed in 7.4. So an update might help.
>
Confirmed, that upgrade to OpenBSD 7.5 fixes an issue.
--
wbr, Kirill
Hi
[2024-04-17 11:34] Kirill A. Korinsky
> On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 09:48:14 +0200,
> Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
> >
> > As simpler solution I see the behaviour for OpenSMTPd to inject MessageId
> > (when it missed) or date.
> >
> > Or it's bad idea?
> >
>
> After reading the code I see that it
[2024-04-16 14:49] Lévai, Dániel
> On Tuesday, April 16th, 2024 at 13:52, Philipp wrote:
> > [2024-04-15 10:11] Lévai, Dániel l...@ecentrum.hu
> >
> > > I've been using this Samsung C480FW printer/scanner forever with
> > > OpenSMTPD and suddenly (no upgrades to OpenSMTPD or changes in the
> >
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 09:48:14 +0200,
Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
>
> As simpler solution I see the behaviour for OpenSMTPd to inject MessageId
> (when it missed) or date.
>
> Or it's bad idea?
>
After reading the code I see that it should insert Date and MessageId if
client is connected to 587
On Tuesday, April 16th, 2024 at 13:52, Philipp wrote:
>
>
> Hi
>
> [2024-04-15 10:11] Lévai, Dániel l...@ecentrum.hu
>
> > I've been using this Samsung C480FW printer/scanner forever with OpenSMTPD
> > and suddenly (no upgrades to OpenSMTPD or changes in the
> > configuration) it started to
Hi
[2024-04-15 10:11] Lévai, Dániel
> I've been using this Samsung C480FW printer/scanner forever with OpenSMTPD
> and suddenly (no upgrades to OpenSMTPD or changes in the
> configuration) it started to complain (it's trying to send scanned documents
> via e-mail):
Has something on the
April 12, 2024 5:18 PM, "Gilles Chehade" wrote:
> PONG !
>
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 5:14 PM wrote:
>
>> April 12, 2024 4:38 PM, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
>>
>>> Helo,
>>>
>>> The list server will be upgraded to OpenBSD 7.5 shortly,
>>> there may be minor disruptions and I'll send a mail when
PONG !
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 5:14 PM wrote:
> April 12, 2024 4:38 PM, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
>
> > Helo,
> >
> > The list server will be upgraded to OpenBSD 7.5 shortly,
> > there may be minor disruptions and I'll send a mail when it's back to
> verify it is dispatched.
> >
> > Sorry for the
April 12, 2024 4:38 PM, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
> Helo,
>
> The list server will be upgraded to OpenBSD 7.5 shortly,
> there may be minor disruptions and I'll send a mail when it's back to verify
> it is dispatched.
>
> Sorry for the noise.
PING ?
CM-SHA384:256
Apr 10 23:34:51 mx1 smtpd[84358]: warn: Disabling incoming SMTP
connections: Client limit reached
Apr 10 23:35:21 mx1 smtpd[84358]: 6ccf0806a1883889 smtp authentication
user=te...@catap.net result=permfail
Apr 10 23:35:21 mx1 smtpd[84358]: 6ccf0806a1883889 smtp failed-
April 11, 2024 11:37 PM, "Kirill A. Korinsky" wrote:
> Greetings,
>
Hello,
> I've noticed that my personal mail stop to working. After some digging in
> the log I discovered the magic line:
>
> Apr 10 23:37:43 mx1 smtpd[84358]: warn: Disabling incoming SMTP connections:
> Client limit
Lucas Gabriel Vuotto writes:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 08:29:20PM -0500, Robert B. Carleton wrote:
>> ---cut here---
>> 600 IN TXT "v=spf1 ip4:155.138.244.69
>> ip6:2001:19f0:6402:39e:5400:4ff:fe49:8b44 a mx -all"
>> _dmarc 600 IN TXT
>>
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 08:29:20PM -0500, Robert B. Carleton wrote:
> ---cut here---
> 600 IN TXT "v=spf1 ip4:155.138.244.69
> ip6:2001:19f0:6402:39e:5400:4ff:fe49:8b44 a mx -all"
> _dmarc 600 IN TXT
>
Hi,
DKIM verfication of my emails has been failing for outbound email when
received by other systems. This email contains those signatures. I don't
check DKIM inbound so that's not a concern.
I created DNS entries for both rsa and ed25519 keys.
The public TXT DNS record of
Something appears to be wrong with your DNS records. Using mxtoolbox and
easydmarc's dkim validators with your selectors, the response is only
v=DKIM1 and is missing the public key p= portion.
I would start with wrapping the text portion with quotes. Otherwise your DNS
server may need the key
Thank you for your assistance.
-Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Tassilo Philipp
Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 1:22 AM
To: gil...@poolp.org
Cc: and...@tekrealm.net; misc@opensmtpd.org
Subject: Re: How to terminate smtpd filters?
I agree with Gilles, your filter should react on stdin closing,
April 2, 2024 6:00 PM, "Tassilo Philipp" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Find attached the first stab at a final patch making generated bounce mails
> follow more closely the
> RFCs 3461, 3464 and 6522. The attached file includes the patch from my
> previous mail in this
> thread.
>
> The patch is based on
I agree with Gilles, your filter should react on stdin closing, but not
sure how your filter is set up.
Also, just a guess... are you running smtpd on Linux?
Linux doesn't kill children when the parent process dies, maybe that's
related? (To make it do that prctl(2) would need to be used w/
April 2, 2024 4:47 AM, and...@tekrealm.net wrote:
> What signals a termination for smtpd filters?
>
> I'm using the code at
> https://github.com/Beutlin/howto-opensmtpd-filters-and-reports,
> Which works great, except for when smtpd gets shutdown. The script continues
> to run and
> consumes up
Perfect, thanks! You are right, this didn't copy anything. I just
noticed it now, b/c I need that param for the DSN work I'm currently
working on.
And sorry for not spotting this earlier, when I tested that final
version of the ORCPT patch, a while ago.
:)
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at
On 2024/03/20 17:36:01 +0100, Tassilo Philipp
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while working on the DSN patches mentioned in another thread, I came
> across an oversight in the final ORCPT patch that will be part of 7.5.0.
>
> Find the patch attached - IMHO, this patch should make it into 7.5.0, as
> it's
changes:
- re-add ASR_IPV4_BEFORE_IPV6 compile-time knob to prefer connecting
to IPv6 instead of IPv4.
- update asr(3) and imsg with OpenBSD.
- configure: readd -R usage on NetBSD mistakenly dropped in previous
release.
Thanks,
Omar Polo
--- ./usr.sbin/smtpd/smtp_session.c.orig2024-03-20
Alright, find attached a first patch, fixing up some content-type
headers, as outlined by RFC3464 and RFC6522 - in detail:
The patch's first hunk follows RFC3464, which specifies that a DSN
should have a top-level type of "multipart/report" with a parameter
"report-type=delivery-status"; the
The new OpenSMTPD 7.5.0rc1 works well with LibreSSL on Slackware64
Linux.
My compile script uses CFLAGS and LDFLAGS like this:
CFLAGS="... -I/usr/include/libressl" \
LDFLAGS="-L/usr/lib64/libressl -lcrypto -lssl \
-Wl,-rpath=/usr/lib64/libressl" \
./configure \
...
On 11.03.2024 09:03, Gilles CHEHADE wrote:
Since people are sharing posts / articles, if others have written such
articles feel free to share in this thread, I’m curious :-)
You can find mine here: https://www.bsdhowto.ch/mxpop3.html
I update it every now and then, mostly when I figure out
Ok, will get busy... I also noticed two other issues, one related to
ENVID= (should be generated for DSNs), and some data in the DSN's
message/delivery-status parts, that must be generated according to eh
RFC, when ENVID= or ORCPT= are present, which are not, currently. Will
look at those, as
March 13, 2024 10:31 AM, "Tassilo Philipp" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed that DSNs generated by OpenSMTPd use "Content-Type:
> multipart/mixed", instead of
> "Content-Type: multipart/report", as defined by RFC3461 (and described in
> RFC3464 and RFC3462). I
> wonder if there's a reason for
Hi!
On 13/03/2024 08:37, SeraphJACK wrote:
I am wondering is there any solution to reject submissions whose sender
name does not match the authenticated username?
I think you are looking for this:
listen on [...] senders masquerade
As stated in smtpd.conf:
Look up the authenticated user
Thomas Bohl wrote:
> >
> > match from mail-from reject
>
> That line doesn't have a for option, so "for local" is implied.
>
> match from any for any mail-from reject
>
> should do the trick.
Yes it did! Thank you very much. I completely forgot that not specifying for
means
for local
Otto Retter wrote:
> Simon,
>
> I have similar functionality working with a filter. Have you tried
> using a filter for this?
No, I have not yet tried that. I wanted to try the "simpler" solution first. :)
>
> Here are some anonymized snippets from my smtpd.conf:
>
> ```
> table bad_guys
No, for a lot of reasons. (ethical and legals ones)
If you want something to translate the page, you can always use a
browser extension. (DeepL, Google Translate, etc...)
PS : Your DMARC policy wants a valid DKIM, however i don't see DKIM
signatures in your emails.
- Jarod
Le 11/03/2024 à
match from mail-from reject
That line doesn't have a for option, so "for local" is implied.
match from any for any mail-from reject
should do the trick.
However, if i use telnet/openssl s_client to connect to the server, I get an OK
in
response to MAIL FROM: and can state RCPT TO and
Love it! Will write another blogposts soon :))
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 09:20:04PM +, Simon Harrison wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 13:59:17 +
> gil...@poolp.org wrote:
>
> > I created a Wiki page on the public repository for OpenSMTPD:
> >
> >
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 13:59:17 +
gil...@poolp.org wrote:
> I created a Wiki page on the public repository for OpenSMTPD:
>
> https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD/wiki/OpenSMTPD-articles-and-posts
>
> List to be completed ;-)
>
Great idea! Might even inspire users to create their own to be
Can you add a google translation button?
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 06:34:04PM +0100, Jarod G. wrote:
> Hey!
>
> I got this one i wrote in 2021 and kept updated ever since :
> https://blog.gamindustri.fr/setup-un-serveur-mail-avec-opensmtpd-dovecot-rspamd-et-postgresql-sur-openbsd/
>
> - Jarod
Hey!
I got this one i wrote in 2021 and kept updated ever since :
https://blog.gamindustri.fr/setup-un-serveur-mail-avec-opensmtpd-dovecot-rspamd-et-postgresql-sur-openbsd/
- Jarod
Le 11/03/2024 à 09:03, Gilles CHEHADE a écrit :
Since people are sharing posts / articles, if others have
I keep a couple of notes here: https://www.tumfatig.net/tags/opensmtpd/
Le 11/03/2024 à 14:59, gil...@poolp.org a écrit :
I created a Wiki page on the public repository for OpenSMTPD:
https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD/wiki/OpenSMTPD-articles-and-posts
List to be completed ;-)
I created a Wiki page on the public repository for OpenSMTPD:
https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD/wiki/OpenSMTPD-articles-and-posts
List to be completed ;-)
On 11/03/2024 09:03, Gilles CHEHADE wrote:
Since people are sharing posts / articles, if others have written such articles
feel free to share in this thread, I’m curious :-)
I wrote one in 2013 and regularly updated it since. I still have a few
updates in mind, therefore it may be improved
*like*
Both look helpful. Maybe update the code blocks a bit - in my experience thats
what people are most looking out for - copy pastable content.
I use https://prismjs.com/ for my blog and am pretty happy with it.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 09:26:27AM +, Simon Harrison wrote:
> On Mon,
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 09:03:44 +0100
Gilles CHEHADE wrote:
> Since people are sharing posts / articles, if others have written
> such articles feel free to share in this thread, I’m curious :-)
I've posted a couple. Mainly as a reference for myself although I've
had a few emails saying they've
Since people are sharing posts / articles, if others have written such articles
feel free to share in this thread, I’m curious :-)
> On 8 Mar 2024, at 22:53, Peter Thurner | Blunix GmbH
> wrote:
>
> Hello misc@opensmtpd.org,
>
> I just wrote a blogpost that explains how to configure
On Sat, 9 Mar 2024, Paul Pace wrote:
That said, you are exactly correct about the problem with Postfix being an
enterprise-grade tool that retains its enterprise-grade complexity. Being
"easier to configure than Sendmail" is too low of a bar and I really think
that OpenSMTPD is what that vast
Hey,
I do have a collection of macOS 10.5…13
--
wbr, Kirill
> On 9. Mar 2024, at 12:22, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Anyone on the list has a MacOS that's not Sonoma and can help track a bug ?
>
> Gilles
>
Hello,
Thanks, I'll provide detailed instructions so you can simply follow step by
step:
1- fetch the archive and install in a temporary directory:
$ sudo brew install libevent
$ wget https://www.opensmtpd.org/archives/opensmtpd-7.5.0rc1.tar.gz
$ tar -zxvf
I can take that. Tell me what you need.
ED.
> On Mar 9, 2024, at 6:21 AM, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Anyone on the list has a MacOS that's not Sonoma and can help track a bug ?
>
> Gilles
>
On 2024/03/09 09:04:29 -0800, Andi Vajda wrote:
> Yes, that fixes it:
>
> $ sudo ./local/sbin/smtpd -d -f /usr/pkg/etc/smtpd/smtpd.conf
> info: OpenSMTPD 7.5.0-portable starting
> dnsbl: config|smtpd-version|7.5.0-portable
> dnsbl: config|smtp-session-timeout|300
> dnsbl:
Hi Omar,
On Sat, 9 Mar 2024, Omar Polo wrote:
Now, back to the problem, the issue is that on NetBSD seteuid() breaks
setuid() and that inbetween 7.3 and 7.4 I lost the check for the
setreuid() function. So, in openbsd-compat/resuid.c we end up calling
seteuid() and then setuid(), which
On 2024-03-08 13:53, Peter Thurner | Blunix GmbH wrote:
Hello misc@opensmtpd.org,
I just wrote a blogpost that explains how to configure OpenSMTPD as a
mailrelay for (Debian based) servers.
I wanted to link it here in the hopes that somebody could find any
mistakes I might have possibly
Simon,
I have similar functionality working with a filter. Have you tried
using a filter for this?
Here are some anonymized snippets from my smtpd.conf:
```
table bad_guys file:/etc/mail/bad_guys
filter "bad_guys" phase mail-from match mail-from regex
reject "550 Bad Guys"
listen on ...
On 2024/03/08 16:11:45 -0800, Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> On Fri, 8 Mar 2024, Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> > With this configuration, the build succeeds on netbsd 10.0_rc5, but I get
> > the
> > same setuid failure as with 7.4.0p1 (but not with 7.3.0p2):
> >
Thanks to Gilles I had the chance to debug
Philipp wrote:
> [2024-03-05 17:07] Simon Hoffmann
> > hmm... Based on Philipps idea I have modified my script as follows:
> >
> >
> >
> > #!/bin/bash
> >
> > cat - > /tmp/notfallemail
>
> Have you notice that this is racy? A better (not elegant solution) is
> something like:
>
> mail=`cat`
(Re-send due to me accidentally sending with the wrong From: address,
apologies to the moderators for the noise.)
On 9/3/24 09:14, Thomas Groman wrote:
Is there any way to configure OpenSMTPd to relay to another mail server
only for outgoing emails to MXs that do not have IPv6 native addresses
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024, Andi Vajda wrote:
With this configuration, the build succeeds on netbsd 10.0_rc5, but I get the
same setuid failure as with 7.4.0p1 (but not with 7.3.0p2):
Looking at obvious differences in the 7.3.0p2, 7.4.0p1 and 7.5.0rc1 smtpd
executables. From ldd's standpoint,
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024, Andi Vajda wrote:
I verified that configure works again with this statement:
Sorry for the noise, the configure statement is:
$ ./configure --prefix=`pwd`/local \
--with-libssl=/home/vajda/libressl-3.8.2/local --with-libevent=/usr/pkg \
Hi Omar,
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024, Omar Polo wrote:
Tarballs are available on the official mirror or on GitHub:
https://opensmtpd.org/archives/opensmtpd-7.5.0rc1.tar.gz
https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD/releases/tag/7.5.0rc1
Verify the tarball with signify(1) and the usual public
I somehow uploaded the correct sum.sig but an older version of the tarball,
let's pretend I did this to ensure someone made a verify test ;-)
Anyways... the tarball has been reuploaded:
$ signify -C -e -p opensmtpd-20181026.pub -x opensmtpd-7.5.0rc1.sum.sig
Signature Verified
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024, Omar Polo wrote:
...
> Tarballs are available on the official mirror or on GitHub:
>
> https://opensmtpd.org/archives/opensmtpd-7.5.0rc1.tar.gz
> https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD/releases/tag/7.5.0rc1
>
> Verify the tarball with signify(1) and the usual public
[2024-03-05 17:07] Simon Hoffmann
> hmm... Based on Philipps idea I have modified my script as follows:
>
>
>
> #!/bin/bash
>
> cat - > /tmp/notfallemail
Have you notice that this is racy? A better (not elegant solution) is
something like:
mail=`cat`
> from=`cat /tmp/notfallemail | head -n 50
make your
original ./configure invocation (i.e. without the -R flag in LDFLAGS and
with --with-libssl) to work out-of-the-box again, hopefully!
I was able to apply the patch.
also, remember to run ./bootstrap after applying the patch to
re-generate the configure script.
There is no file named
o run ./bootstrap after applying the patch to
re-generate the configure script.
> [...]
> Next problem: starting opensmtpd-7.4.0p1 fails with the setuid error seen
> earlier when building from pkgsrc :-( (ie, pkgsrc is not the problem):
>
> $ sudo ./local/sbin/smtpd -d -f /usr/p
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 06:19:10PM +, Simon Harrison wrote:
> I've got an odd problem. I'm using smtpd as a relay. Everything works
> fine, except, every 2-3 weeks I get the following error (on my local
> machine):
>
> 47b6501430167caa mta error reason=IO Error: certificate verification
>
On Wed, 6 Mar 2024, Omar Polo wrote:
So the issue is that at runtime ld.so fails to load libevent2 somehow...
I took a closer look at config.log files produced opensmtpd-7.3.0p2 and
opensmtpd-7.4.0p1. The difference is that 7.3.0p2 uses -R flags, 7.4.0p1
does not.
The configure command
On 2024/03/04 09:32:14 -0800, Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> On Mon, 4 Mar 2024, Omar Polo wrote:
>
> > Sorry, I made a typo. It should be
> >
> >./configure CFLAGS='-I/home/vajda/libressl-3.8.2/local/include/
> > -I/usr/pkg/include'
> >
> > I missed the /include at the end of both -I args.
> >
>
hmm... Based on Philipps idea I have modified my script as follows:
#!/bin/bash
cat - > /tmp/notfallemail
from=`cat /tmp/notfallemail | head -n 50 | grep -i ^From`
from=${from// /+}
subject=`cat /tmp/notfallemail | head -n 50 | grep -i ^Subject`
subject=${subject// /+}
out=`curl -g
March 5, 2024 4:19 PM, "Simon Hoffmann" wrote:
> gil...@poolp.org wrote:
>
>> Does your script exit with 0 ?
>
> If the curl output is "OK", then I exit with "exit 0". I have even removed
> the "if"
> and have just set a static "exit 0" at the end no matter if the curl before
> was
>
Philipp wrote:
> Hi Simon
>
> [2024-03-05 10:49] Simon Hoffmann
> > in my virtual users file, I have specified an external script additionally
> > to
> > delivery to mailboxes.
> >
> >
> > emerge...@domain.tlduser1,user2,|/etc/smtpd/send_sms.sh
> >
> > Local delivery to the mailboxes
gil...@poolp.org wrote:
> Does your script exit with 0 ?
If the curl output is "OK", then I exit with "exit 0". I have even removed the
"if"
and have just set a static "exit 0" at the end no matter if the curl before was
successful or not. This did not work as well.
However, Philipp might be
Hi Simon
[2024-03-05 10:49] Simon Hoffmann
> in my virtual users file, I have specified an external script additionally to
> delivery to mailboxes.
>
>
> emerge...@domain.tlduser1,user2,|/etc/smtpd/send_sms.sh
>
> Local delivery to the mailboxes works fine.
> The script itself is
Does your script exit with 0 ?
March 5, 2024 10:49 AM, "Simon Hoffmann" wrote:
> Hey list,
>
> in my virtual users file, I have specified an external script additionally to
> delivery to mailboxes.
>
> emerge...@domain.tld user1,user2,|/etc/smtpd/send_sms.sh
>
> Local delivery to the
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024, Omar Polo wrote:
Sorry, I made a typo. It should be
./configure CFLAGS='-I/home/vajda/libressl-3.8.2/local/include/
-I/usr/pkg/include'
I missed the /include at the end of both -I args.
If it still doesn't work, can you please include the `config.log' file?
Feel
On 2024/03/03 16:42:55 -0800, Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> On Sun, 3 Mar 2024, Omar Polo wrote:
>
> > ouch! Don't know much of how pkgsrc works, but this seems strange. Can
> > you make sure the users were created? `grep smtp /etc/passwd' should be
> > enough.
>
> Yes, both users exist. I created
On Sun, 3 Mar 2024, Andi Vajda wrote:
On Sun, 3 Mar 2024, Omar Polo wrote:
ouch! Don't know much of how pkgsrc works, but this seems strange. Can
you make sure the users were created? `grep smtp /etc/passwd' should be
enough.
Yes, both users exist. I created them with id 1012 and 1013
On Sun, 3 Mar 2024, Omar Polo wrote:
ouch! Don't know much of how pkgsrc works, but this seems strange. Can
you make sure the users were created? `grep smtp /etc/passwd' should be
enough.
Yes, both users exist. I created them with id 1012 and 1013 and they work
fine with 7.3.0p2 built
1 - 100 of 3530 matches
Mail list logo
