On 04.05.16 15:51, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> +1 requesting this feature:
>
> http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/47773/rebinding-clear-prompt-in-mutt
Yes, that would be wonderful. The ^G aberration is a mindbender.
> All command line Unix-like system applications should support vi
+1 requesting this feature:
http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/47773/rebinding-clear-prompt-in-mutt
All command line Unix-like system applications should support vi as well
as emacs key bindings.
Walter
=- Michelle Konzack wrote on Sun 18.May'08 at 0:06:56 +0200 -=
This would simplify things, because currently if I use
mutt -F ~/.mutt_bts/muttrc
I have to specify ALL files I source with the FULL PATH which mess
up things since some files are only copies from other configs and
I
Hi,
* Rado S wrote:
=- Michelle Konzack wrote on Sun 18.May'08 at 0:06:56 +0200 -=
This would simplify things, because currently if I use
mutt -F ~/.mutt_bts/muttrc
I have to specify ALL files I source with the FULL PATH which mess
up things since some files are only copies from
Hello,
Since I am developer and my mailinglist/bts subscriptions explode I like
to separate the stuff. Unfortunately I have already over 200 config
files in my ~/.mutt/ directory.
I know I can use
mutt -F ~/.mutt/muttrc_std
mutt -F ~/.mutt/muttrc_bts
mutt -F ~/.mutt/muttrc_ml
.. like save_name but mutt resolves `bar' from foo.bar.com
Some suggested hacks for this but IMHO, this is sufficicently
useful (especially for those who deal with many companies /
organisations) to be native functionality.
--
Eric Smith [hoping]
* Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-01 10:18]:
Some suggested hacks for this but IMHO, this is sufficicently
useful (especially for those who deal with many companies /
organisations) to be native functionality.
This seems like a good learning excersize, so I was looking into this,
trying
Hi.
Just minor addition, else, I think this has been discussed quite
thourougly now.
On Sat 2002-07-06 at 11:07:53 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
* Benjamin Pflugmann [02-07-05 23:56:08 +0200] wrote:
On Fri 2002-07-05 at 01:36:52 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
I misunderstood him (completely) but
Hi,
* Benjamin Pflugmann [02-07-05 23:56:08 +0200] wrote:
On Fri 2002-07-05 at 01:36:52 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
* Benjamin Pflugmann [02-07-05 00:44:50 +0200] wrote:
[...]
I misunderstood him (completely) but one may specify a
limit pattern to show only the mails of one
Hi.
On Fri 2002-07-05 at 01:36:52 +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
* Benjamin Pflugmann [02-07-05 00:44:50 +0200] wrote:
[...]
I misunderstood him (completely) but one may specify a limit
pattern to show only the mails of one correspondence.
How?
I do not think so. The work to do would not be
* Vincent Lefevre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020701 08:47]:
And using push doesn't work correctly with IMAP folders because
the corresponding characters are sent as password characters (for
security reasons, I don't store my password on my account, though
I could change my mind later).
If you're
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 00:20:17 -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote:
If you're not using SSH or SSL for your IMAP anyway, it's no less safe
[...]
On the internal network, we have the choice between using SSL or not
(and it's regarded as safe as it's on the internal network, though
I prefer to use SSL
Hi,
Situation:
I usually have to switch between =mbox and =outbox to check the mails on
a specific topic we've gone on for a while. Sometimes, another one, say
=work/project-A, needs to get involved, too.
The same case happens among =mbox.mutt, =outbox, and =mlist/mutt for my
daily life.
I'd like to have aliases for mailboxes. Well, I suppose I could define
a spurious address with the wanted alias so that I could use the @alias
form. But it would be better if there was a cleaner way. And this alias
should be displayed instead of the full name with %f in $status_format.
Then, how
* Vincent Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-07-01 08:32:05 +0200]:
Then, how about being able to do internal filtering? For instance, using
mailboxes the_mailbox#pattern1
mailboxes the_mailbox#pattern2
mailboxes the_mailbox#pattern3
mailboxes the_mailbox#pattern4
When opening the
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 14:58:03 +0100, Dave Pearson wrote:
I've been doing this sort of thing for a long time using links in
the filesystem and mutt's `folder-hook'.
See URL:http://www.davep.org/mutt/muttrc/folder-hooks.html and
look at the last set of hooks.
This is not exactly what I
* Gary Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-10 14:22]:
Being able to color and uncolor patterns
in the pager would be a good solution.
yes - an uncolor command is definitely missing.
i keep finding this when testing new color patterns.
you'll know once you enter a pattern
like ^ or . with a
* Michael Tatge [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-10 14:52:24 +0200]:
So far so good. Currently it is impossible to remove that pattern
again. uncolor only works in the index.
Devellopers, any chance to change that?
Once again I'd like to add my voice this feature. I see how you
people are...I
* Gary Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-10 10:22]:
[-- snip --]
That being said, I would really like such an uncolor feature myself.
I receive internal newsletters that I find easier to read if I
highlight the section headings like this:
display-hook '~s blips' 'push
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:54:49AM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote:
That being said, I would really like such an uncolor feature myself.
I receive internal newsletters that I find easier to read if I
highlight the section headings like this:
display-hook '~s blips' 'push
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:54:49AM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote:
Where does display-hook come from? I just built 1.3.28 and use
1.3.22.1 regularly and neither has it. I'm assuming it comes from a
patch, but which one?
It was a patch for the 1.2 series. I'm using
* Dan Boger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-11 12:02]:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:54:49AM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote:
That being said, I would really like such an uncolor feature myself.
I receive internal newsletters that I find easier to read if I
highlight the section headings like
Hi all,
I just played around with my color setup. I found that it's sometimes
usefull to hightlight numbers in the body of a message to find a phone
number and the like. Now, I want to do that only on demand.
macro pager f5 exitenter-commandcolor body [0-9]enterdisplay-message
So far so good.
Michael --
...and then Michael Tatge said...
%
% Hi all,
Hello!
%
% I just played around with my color setup. I found that it's sometimes
% usefull to hightlight numbers in the body of a message to find a phone
Sure; that makes sense.
% number and the like. Now, I want to do that only on
David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
...and then Michael Tatge said...
% macro pager f5 exitenter-commandcolor body [0-9]enterdisplay-message
%
What about a different approach: just search for [0-9\-/\.]*
No. This would color each and every -, / and ., too. But
([0-9]+[\.:/-]*)* would
Michael --
...and then Michael Tatge said...
%
% David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
% ...and then Michael Tatge said...
% % macro pager f5 exitenter-commandcolor body [0-9]enterdisplay-message
% %
%
% What about a different approach: just search for [0-9\-/\.]*
%
% No. This would
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 04:06:02PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
...and then Michael Tatge said...
% macro pager f5 exitenter-commandcolor body [0-9]enterdisplay-message
%
What about a different approach: just search for [0-9\-/\.]*
No. This
David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
...and then Michael Tatge said...
%
% What about a different approach: just search for [0-9\-/\.]*
^^
% ([0-9]+[\.:/-]*)* would do for most numbers, phones, dates and times.
% Only I cannot turn it
Michael --
...and then Michael Tatge said...
%
% David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
% ...and then Michael Tatge said...
...
%
% % Only I cannot turn it off, which sucks.
%
% What's to turn off?
%
% Right, you're talking about seraching not coloring, which I missed the
Ah. Right.
begin quoting what Sven Guckes said on Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 01:39:43AM +0200:
feature request denied.
macro index c change-folder!
That breaks ? for list functionality. It would be better to assign
it to another key:
macro index I change-folder!\r
Then get used to using I when you
* Shawn McMahon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [04-04-02 08:22]:
begin quoting what Sven Guckes said on Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 01:39:43AM +0200:
feature request denied.
macro index c change-folder!
That breaks ? for list functionality. It would be better to assign
it to another key:
macro
Feature request. It would be nice and timesaving (for me, at least) if
change-folder would default to ! when where was not a folder
containing New Mail. Perhaps a set feature in muttrc ??
set change-folder some-default-location
Just a thought.
--
Pat Shanahan Registered Linux
* pat [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-03 19:48]:
Feature request. It would be nice and timesaving (for me, at least)
if change-folder would default to ! when where was not a folder
containing New Mail. Perhaps a set feature in muttrc ??
set change-folder some-default-location
feature request
Sven Guckes wrote:
* pat [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-03 19:48]:
Feature request. It would be nice and timesaving (for me, at least)
if change-folder would default to ! when where was not a folder
containing New Mail. Perhaps a set feature in muttrc ??
set change-folder some-default
* Sven Guckes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [04-03-02 19:50]:
* pat [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-04-03 19:48]:
Feature request. It would be nice and timesaving (for me, at
PS: But, dammit, Pat, put your name into the
From: line so an attribution makes sense!
Sven
Just for you, Sven.
aka patrick
I'm not sure I used the correct terminology in the Subject: line, but
what I'm looking for is pretty easy to explain (hopefully easy to
implement also :p) Basically, this is what we have now:
auto_view image/tiff
This line tells mutt to consult $mailcap_path and find a mailcap entry
that
Alexander, et al --
...and then Alexander V. Konstantinou said...
% % Right now I've achieved this functionality through a wrapper shell
% % script that greps for the alias name and invokes mutt with the real
% % user name.
%
% That makes sense, though it sounds somewhat painful.
%
% It
Alexander --
...and then Alexander V. Konstantinou said...
% As far as I can tell, mutt does not support openning the folder of
% a user based on an alias. For example, consider user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
% that is aliased as foo.
Yep.
%
% I'd like to be able to open the folder using mutt -f
% Right now I've achieved this functionality through a wrapper shell
% script that greps for the alias name and invokes mutt with the real
% user name.
That makes sense, though it sounds somewhat painful.
It is not really painful, or slow for that matter on my machine ...
Here is my quick
As far as I can tell, mutt does not support openning the folder of
a user based on an alias. For example, consider user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that is aliased as foo.
I'd like to be able to open the folder using mutt -f =foo (perhaps
using some other symbol than '=').
Right now I've achieved this
Thanks!
Erwin
Mutt is great!
Two features I'd like to propose:
1. The screen should be cleared at termination.
2. Often I get mail with a lot of adresses in the Cc: field which
I'd like to take into my alias list. So: Could the taking alias
feature be expanded to other entries and mulpiple entries?
Thanks to
Erwin Kaiser writes:
Mutt is great!
Two features I'd like to propose:
1. The screen should be cleared at termination.
This is a feature of the terminal emulator you are running.
This is the reason why I replaced the xterm terminfo entry
on my Solaris box with the X11R6 xterm definition
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 11:35:43AM +0200, Erwin Kaiser wrote:
2. Often I get mail with a lot of adresses in the Cc: field which
I'd like to take into my alias list. So: Could the taking alias
feature be expanded to other entries and mulpiple entries?
see
David wrote:
send-hook ~l 'push f^Uenterpsenter'
Okay well that should have been just:
send-hook ~l 'push psenter'
I have f^U as i dont want to save my messages i send to mailing lists as
they get sent back to me anyway.
--
Don't tell me I'm burning the candle at both ends -- tell me where
At 16:00 +0200 08 Apr 2001, Christian Biesinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be nice if there was an option for mutt to not encrypt mails
for mailing lists, even though I've set crypt_autoencrypt to yes (I've
installed the S/MIME patch).
I know that I could use send-hook for this, but
Christian Biesinger wrote:
I know that I could use send-hook for this, but then I'd have to add
every mailing list to send-hook as well as to lists/subscribe.
If you have already added the mailing lists to the subscribe list in
your muttrc then all you have to do is use a send hook like:
On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 09:37:06PM -0500, Aaron Schrab wrote:
send-hook ~l 'unset crypt_autoencrypt'
The ~l pattern will match if the message is going to a known list.
Hm...
This works fine for lists I'm subscribed to.
It doesn't work, though, for the lists I'm not subscribed to. Yes,
Mutt
Christian Biesinger [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Currently, I've configured Mutt to always encrypt messages I send.
However, sometimes I send mails to mailing lists.
Mutt knows about them (I've got entries for them in my ~/.muttrc using
lists or subscribe).
However, usually mails to
Hello!
Currently, I've configured Mutt to always encrypt messages I send.
However, sometimes I send mails to mailing lists.
Mutt knows about them (I've got entries for them in my ~/.muttrc using
lists or subscribe).
However, usually mails to mailing lists should not be encrypted.
It would be
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 03:22:58PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
Heinrich --
...and then Heinrich Langos said...
% hi
%
% often i get mails that i would like to be reminded of later.
% like i get a mail from my girlfriend in the morning that i should
% fetch something on the way home in the
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:16:58PM +0100 or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
Heinrich Langos thought:
so the question that remains is: how do i prompt a user in mutt
for input and use that input in the macro?
Best I've done is to use xmessage and get the return from the buttons
pressed but
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:16:58PM +0100, Heinrich Langos wrote:
could mutt ask me for input while running a macro ?
like this:
i press my remind-key and mutt askes me for input (e.g. the time i
want to be reminded of that message) and then pipes the mail to an
external programm putting the
Heinrich --
...and then Heinrich Langos said...
% On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 03:22:58PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% ...and then Heinrich Langos said...
% %
% % often i get mails that i would like to be reminded of later.
...
% % and is lost between tons of more or less important stuff.
%
% It
Heinrich --
...and then Heinrich Langos said...
% hi
%
% often i get mails that i would like to be reminded of later.
% like i get a mail from my girlfriend in the morning that i should
% fetch something on the way home in the evening.
% but in the evening that mail has been scrolled way off
hi
often i get mails that i would like to be reminded of later.
like i get a mail from my girlfriend in the morning that i should
fetch something on the way home in the evening.
but in the evening that mail has been scrolled way off the screen
and is lost between tons of more or less important
One thing you could do is to use the "important" flag and try to get
a habit of looking at the flagged messages from time to time.
You could even write a little shell script which basically greps for
"X-Status:.*F", and regularly reminds you that you have important
mail sitting in your inbox.
Heinrich Langos proclaimed on mutt-users that:
like i get a mail from my girlfriend in the morning that i should
fetch something on the way home in the evening.
but in the evening that mail has been scrolled way off the screen
and is lost between tons of more or less important stuff.
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 01:38:15PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
One thing you could do is to use the "important" flag and try to get
a habit of looking at the flagged messages from time to time.
that would mean that all falagged messages would show up all the time..
You could even write a
Hi,
On 00-12-18, Heinrich Langos wrote:
is there a way in mutt to get reminded of that mail later or does
anybody know a local mail bouncer daemon that delays delivery for
a (by header or subject) configurable time ?
You could tell Procmail to put out an at(1) job.
Or make a makro to do this if
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 06:34:45PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
Wouldn't procmailing mails from your girlfriend, your co-workers etc etc into
separate folders help? ;)
not realy ... since i wouldn't reread old mail if not reminded.
not even mail from my girl :-)
What you are
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 10:46:14AM +0100, Heinrich Langos wrote:
and an internal mutt solution (like in a special follow-up-folder)
would be nicer anyway since you could still access that mails whenever
you liked to.
I use mutt in combination with procmail and xbuffy.
If I need to remind
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 07:29:42PM +0530, Sankaranarayanan K V wrote:
I use mutt in combination with procmail and xbuffy.
If I need to remind myself of a mail, I flag that message as new and
save it in a special folder -- done with a macro. Rest is taken care by
xbuffy. Further, xbuffy is
On 2000-12-18 14:25:41 +0100, Heinrich Langos wrote:
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 01:38:15PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
One thing you could do is to use the "important" flag and try
to get a habit of looking at the flagged messages from time to
time.
that would mean that all falagged
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 02:14:09PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
Did you try to change the content-type of these octet-streams to
application/pgp? With the more recent mutt versions, you can
comfortably do this from within mutt.
Really? I'm using mutt 1.2i .
What version do I need to do
Daniel Kollar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 23 Oct 2000:
Did you try to change the content-type of these octet-streams to
application/pgp? With the more recent mutt versions, you can
comfortably do this from within mutt.
Really? I'm using mutt 1.2i .
What version do I need to do this
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 10:25:02AM +0200, Daniel Kollar wrote:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 02:14:09PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
Did you try to change the content-type of these octet-streams to
application/pgp? With the more recent mutt versions, you can
comfortably do this from within
Hello mutt-developers,
here is a feature request for future versions of mutt:
Mutt looks for the PGPPASS environment variable. If this is set, then
no passphrase is needed to be send to pgp program, because pgp looks
for the PGPPASS variable by itself.
Mutt will also not ask the user
+0200, Daniel Kollar wrote:
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 10:21:20 +0200
From: Daniel Kollar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mutt User List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FEATURE-REQUEST: mutt looks for PGPPASS environment variable
Mail-Followup-To: Mutt User List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
Hello mutt
Don't do that.
Storing the pgp pass phrase in an environment variable may have been
a valid option on MS-DOS computers. It isn't on Unix machines,
since the environment is not guaranteed to be confidential.
I'm working on unix.
In the PGP CmdLineGuide you will find a section about this.
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 01:51:13PM +0200, Daniel Kollar wrote:
In the PGP CmdLineGuide you will find a section about this.
There you can read that using this feature is safe when you use in in
a environment where no one else has access to it.
I'm doing that. The environment is only active
On 2000-10-20 13:51:13 +0200, Daniel Kollar wrote:
I'm doing that. The environment is only active as long as mutt is
open. No one from outside can access it.
That's your particular environment. However, mutt is designed in a
way which makes it suitable for use on real multi-user systems.
From a bash prompt, try running:
COLUMNS= ps ae | grep mutt
and see if you don't change your mind about using PGPPASS.
--
Bob Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
"Just don't create a file called -rf. :-)"
--
On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 02:06:02PM +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote:
:On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 02:14:28AM -0700, Eugene Lee wrote:
:
: Besides tagging messages by absolute datetimes, this could be extended
: to your specific problem by allowing relative datetime patterns. So you
: could do things
On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 12:20:29AM -0500, Carlos Puchol wrote:
:
:i have a mailbox with 3000 messages and the problem is that
:i keep on leaving stuff there that i think i will need later,
:but stays there for years.
:
:the idea is to delay-delete a message. the idea is to
:mark a message for
* Eugene Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000628 09:21]:
On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 12:20:29AM -0500, Carlos Puchol wrote:
:the idea is to delay-delete a message. the idea is to
:mark a message for deletion, but not delete it for a while.
:say i set my 'delay-delete' to 14 days.
.. So you could do
On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 02:14:28AM -0700, Eugene Lee wrote:
Actually, I'd like to have add some kind of search pattern to the
message-tagging functions. For example, if I knew that I have a bunch
of messages from Januaary and February 2000, I'd like to be to be able
to tag them, then do with
i just had an idea for a feature that i think could kick ass.
though maybe it is already in place :)
i have a mailbox with 3000 messages and the problem is that
i keep on leaving stuff there that i think i will need later,
but stays there for years.
the idea is to delay-delete a message. the
Hi again!
...and then David @ BigFoot said...
% Thomas, et al --
%
% ...and then Thomas Roessler said...
% % On 2000-04-19 14:57:10 +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
% %
% % If I remember the thread right, this request came about
% % partially because you can't do the "graft" function
% % when
On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 09:03:44AM +0200, Thomas Roessler muttered:
- On 2000-04-19 00:18:22 -0400, David T-G wrote:
-
- Thoughts?
-
- Real men use edit-message for this functionality. But
- then again, real men also read their e-mail with dd(1).
-
- :-)
_REAL_ programmers read their email
On 2000-04-19 00:18:22 -0400, David T-G wrote:
Thoughts?
Real men use edit-message for this functionality. But
then again, real men also read their e-mail with dd(1).
:-)
--
http://www.guug.de/~roessler/
Mikko --
...and then Mikko Hänninen said...
% Thomas Roessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wed, 19 Apr 2000:
% Real men use edit-message for this functionality. But
% then again, real men also read their e-mail with dd(1).
%
% If I remember the thread right, this request came about partially
%
Thomas --
...and then Thomas Roessler said...
% On 2000-04-19 00:18:22 -0400, David T-G wrote:
%
% Thoughts?
%
% Real men use edit-message for this functionality. But
Well, I'd like to, but it doesn't seem to work. I haven't actually tried
edit-message to prune, but I certainly have tried
On 2000-04-19 14:57:10 +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
If I remember the thread right, this request came about
partially because you can't do the "graft" function
when sending messages. Even if you use edit-headers and
include a correct References header, Mutt will remove
it before sending.
On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 05:11:26PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
On 2000-04-19 14:57:10 +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
If I remember the thread right, this request came about
partially because you can't do the "graft" function
when sending messages. Even if you use edit-headers and
Hi again!
...and then David @ BigFoot said...
% Hi, folks --
%
% How can I manually update (or create) the References: header in mutt? I
Well, I got absolutely no answers to this one. Clearly I should try
again :-)
I realized that what I wanted was a compose function that might be
called
Is there a way to make mutt display headers in the same order for each
mail? It seem that mutt is just printing the headers in the order that
is inside each email. Like sometimes I get:
Date: blah
From: foo
To:me
Subject: Uh huh.
Message-ID: string
and other times I get:
Message-ID:
I'm an idiot.
hdr_order
Guess I need to get sgml-tools eh?
--timball
--
Send mail with subject "send pgp key" for public key.
pub 1024R/CFF85605 1999-06-10 Timothy L. Ball [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key fingerprint = 8A 8E 64 D6 21 C0 90 29 9F D6 1E DC F8 18 CB CD
Timothy Ball [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 07 Dec 1999:
Is there a way to make mutt display headers in the same order for each
mail?
Yes, the hdr_order command.
I personally use this in my .muttrc:
# Header order
hdr_order Date: From: To: Cc: Subject: Resent-
Regards,
Mikko
--
// Mikko
On 07-Dec-1999, Timothy Ball wrote:
I already use the ignore and uninore thingie. I was just hoping to order
the headers so that reading email becomes more uniform.
I've been using hdr_order ever since I used mutt back in 0.9x. I guess
you need to dig deeper into the manual.
--
Ronny
that this command is implemented for half an eternity.
On 1999-12-07 10:00:19 -0600, Timothy Ball wrote:
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 1999 10:00:19 -0600
From: Timothy Ball [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mutt Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Feature Request] ordering of headers
Mail-Followup-To: Mutt
Hi Timothy!
You need to set hdr_order ie:
hdr_order From: Subject: To: Cc: Bcc:
Sean
On Tue, 07 Dec 1999, Timothy Ball wrote:
Is there a way to make mutt display headers in the same order for each
mail? It seem that mutt is just printing the headers in the order that
is inside each email.
Yes. www.pgpi.com has a pgp (6.5.x) plugin for outlook express 4/5, pegasus
mail, outlook, and eudora
-matt
- Original Message -
From: Mark Weinem [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 04, 1999 11:01 AM
Subject: Re: A feature request
On Thu, Sep 02, 1999
Hello,
mutt is wonderful. However there is nothing perfect in this world (for
me, that is), so I'd like to talk a bit about ignore_list_reply_to
variable. We have a couple of local (in geographical sense) mailing
lists in which mails come with a huge variance in To: fields, e.g.
To: [EMAIL
Also, does anybody know what `Content-Type: text/plain, charset="utf-7"'
mean? I do know UTF-8, but I can only guess what UTF-7 is. AFAIK both
Netscape and Internet Explorer support it. I recently received a couple
of mails in this encoding (mailer: MS Outlook Express 5.00) and the only
Ralf Hildebrandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you ever wished you could take back something you said? Well
here's some good news: Outlook allows you to recall an email message
that you sent to another Outlook user!
This is a feature of the underlying Exchange protocol. SMTP has no such
On Wed, Aug 11, 1999, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
Have you ever wished you could take back something you said? Well
here's some good news: Outlook allows you to recall an email message
that you sent to another Outlook user! This feature works only if the
message you're trying to recall hasn't
On Wed, Aug 11, 1999 at 06:54:25PM +0100, Lars Hecking wrote:
Hmm, I wonder how one can abuse this? But wouldn't that be another
nice feature for mutt?
Ralf, you should lock your screen while away from the computer.
I can't believe you actually typed this :)
Ok, the eclipse burned my
On Wed, Aug 11, 1999 at 12:56:14PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote:
This is a feature of the underlying Exchange protocol. SMTP has no such
feature.
Hmm, but couldn't mutt support this feature?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb
The secret of flying is simple:
On Wed, Aug 11, 1999 at 08:26:40PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 1999 at 12:56:14PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote:
This is a feature of the underlying Exchange protocol. SMTP has no such
feature.
Hmm, but couldn't mutt support this feature?
And now, for your amusement,
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
