Prague!
It is my favorite, and at this time of year most of the turists are gone. Rome is
nice too.
DagT
fra: Ryan Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Was just looking at some places in Europe to go as a side trip for a couple
of days on my trip to Europe. Have been offered Dublin, Munich, Frankfurt,
G'day Ryan.
Mate try to do the Black Forest in Germany.
I did it in July 2002. Took the back roads from Baden Baden to Stuttgart.
Bloody fantastic. There are the villages along the way that are straight out
of the story books.
Hooroo.
Regards, Trevor
Grafton
-Original Message-
From: Ryan
Hi,
Can't end it now, PDML won't have another chance to self-destruct over
politics for another four years!
Ahem, we don't all live in the US you know :-)
Sometimes I think I ought to apply for US citizenship, just so I can
vote for the Democrats once every 4 years. US presidential elections
On Nov 2, 2004, at 4:48 PM, Jens Bladt wrote:
So, which oraganizer do you use - if any?
I use a bunch of slide books.
For digital files, I don't have any organiser except for my PAW
database.
I might import everything into iPhoto one of these days.
Cheers,
- Dave
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004, Jim Apilado wrote:
2-Have you previously owned other digital cameras,either PS or DSLR
Yes, a little tiny Sony U30.
I have a Sony U60. You can operate this one with just one hand, unlike the
U30.
What? I operate my U30 with one hand most of the time, actually. It's
On 1/11/04, Keith Whaley, discombobulated, unleashed:
Good Godfey! I knew him back before he rated a Sir!
I followed him faithfully thruout all the mid- and late-'50's Grand Prix
racing...What a time!
He's still going and a strong proponent for saving Silverstone in the F1
calendar...
I use a spreadsheet set up years ago to manage my slide collection
(Open Office Calc - actually I originally used a database program but
I find Open Office can cope for the present). The spreadsheet has a
whole stack of data fields (including keywords), most of which are
probably of little value
tpb If I'm not mistaken, DX coding allows for coding a film canister for 72 shots.
tpb If so, that means one could put *at least* 72 shots in a
tpb blank canister if you buy film by meters (17 meters is usual I
tpb think).
AFAIK Ilford used to make a film on thin base for journalists, it
allowed
I agree , although being from Prague I am not the most objective advisor
;-)
At least here is none of that undrinkable Foster's ;-)
Fra
dcn Prague!
dcn It is my favorite, and at this time of year most of the
dcn turists are gone. Rome is nice too.
dcn DagT
fra: Ryan Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Great news all around! All hail Silverstone!
Thanks,
keith
Cotty wrote:
On 1/11/04, Keith Whaley, discombobulated, unleashed:
Good Godfey! I knew him back before he rated a Sir!
I followed him faithfully thruout all the mid- and late-'50's Grand Prix
racing...What a time!
He's still going and
Red Hat by Mishka - The eyes have it
Thanks, Frank.
I just hope my SO doesn't run into it on the web by a chance. I am not
sure she's
going to find it too flattering (but then I'll read her your post :)
I agree with you: this is a fantastic gallery this month!
Best,
Mishka
Prague.
Also, Tallin(n), Riga, Vilnious.
Mishka
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 12:37:32 +0100, Frantisek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree , although being from Prague I am not the most objective advisor
;-)
At least here is none of that undrinkable Foster's ;-)
Fra
dcn Prague!
dcn It is
Jens,
Either your lens has its *every* element sanded, covered with
vaseline and reversed,
or people who claim passable 11x14 from *istd are blind.
Or both.
Mishka
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 04:44:42 +0100, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Rob. The spreadsheet is very usefull. It's seems
- Original Message -
From: Mishka
Subject: Re: USAF target and resolution tests
Jens,
Either your lens has its *every* element sanded, covered with
vaseline and reversed,
or people who claim passable 11x14 from *istd are blind.
Not necessarily.
The istD isn't a high resolution camera,
Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have thought about this one too, Mark. But I'd like to check out the fast
Sigma: Sigma EX 18-50mm DC Pentax /2,8.
I need a lens that will work on my film cameras as well as my DSLR...
I would prefer all my lenses to be at least 2.8 all the way.
Me, too!
To the best of my knowledge both the Sigma DG and Tamron Di
lenses are full frame 35mm.
They are in some way optimised for digital.
This is a quote from the description of the 17-35 EX DG:
The design concept of this lens is especially suitable
for the characteristics of Digital SLR Cameras.
Sorry about the last post, I see now that it was DC rather than DG.
Correct, the DC has an APS size image circle.
So they're are off my list also for the time being.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 6:50 AM
To:
Just a thought.
From what i have receieved from my poll so far,everyone is pleased with the *istD's
images
as in they
are sharp and do not have the digital look to them.
Got me to thinking(2nd time this year,i'm on a roll.lol)Have you
So, which oraganizer do you use - if any?
The File Browser in Photoshop CS. Handles RAW files, of course, and
since the exposure/lens info is included in RAW files I'll automatically
have that info for DSLR shots. I need to come up with a standard for
organizing the directories and placing the
Just remember your focusing ring won't work,
whether or not you use a step-up. You won't
be anywhere near infinty focus.
-Lon
John Whittingham wrote:
If I get the 52 mm version, would I be able to use 49 mm
lenses with a filter step-up ring, or would the lens-to-film
distance be wrong then
Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To the best of my knowledge both the Sigma DG and Tamron Di
lenses are full frame 35mm.
Right, but the Sigma EX 18-50mm f/2.8 DC isn't one of the DG lenses.
The DC lenses *are* APS digital only.
They are in some way optimised for digital.
This is a quote
Mark Roberts wrote:
For now I will stay away from the Pentax DAs except
for the 16-45/4 that came with the D.
I'm going to avoid expensive DAs because I don't want to have a D'oh!
moment when I buy the full-frame digital in a few years. But with the
investment Pentax and others are making in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1-Why did you buy a Pentax *istD.
I have lots of Pentax-mount lenses
2-Did you previously own a PS digital prior to the D.
Nope.
3-Did you compare printed quality of the D to scanned images before and or after the
purchase..
Yes.
4-What problems have you had with
Hei, Jens!
I used FotoStation v4.5 extensively before buying *istD. All my scans are
categorised in there, and I made a lot of offline archives with it as well.
Actually, the only thing I missed was handling of PEF files.
The current PRO version of FotoStation (v.5.something) is supposed to
Was sending this to my sis, thought, what the heck, I'll try posting it
here. My last three never got to the list, maybe this will. It's innocuous
enough ... also shows bokeh for K105/2.8 However, when viewed at a larger
size, that of the final print, the bokeh seems to smooth out quite a bit.
Considering the few votes for Prague, I went to do some light research. Came
across a few cautions about personal safety. Something which seemed to come
up quite a bit was taxis in the street and pickpockets. Considering that
I'll be travelling alone and am quite certain that I look like a prime
On 2 Nov 2004 at 6:26, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Was sending this to my sis, thought, what the heck, I'll try posting it
here. My last three never got to the list, maybe this will. It's innocuous
enough ... also shows bokeh for K105/2.8 However, when viewed at a larger
size, that of the final
Jens Bladt wrote on 11/1/2004, 10:48 PM:
So, which oraganizer do you use - if any?
I have tried FotoStation which is quite nice, but rather expensive (150
USD).
I use ACDSee which came free with my Optio MX.
--
Christian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
One of the issues that many digital photographers have told
me about is the small size of all, including CF, memory modules.
They're easy to lose. They fall out of bags. It's a pain.
And since digital cameras are (finally) becomine real computers, it would stand to
reason that we need a
Ryan Lee wrote:
Considering the few votes for Prague, I went to do some light research. Came
across a few cautions about personal safety. Something which seemed to come
up quite a bit was taxis in the street and pickpockets. Considering that
I'll be travelling alone and am quite certain that I
I was in Prague at few occasions and I did not feel any concern for my safety,
probably because I was drunk most of the time.
But I would not feel safe with $2000 camera on my neck, expensive watch, full wallet
of money and credit cards. If you don't have
anything of value on you or you
We went to Prague last April. It was very safe and extremely
enjoyable. One of the nicest cities in Europe, and very scenic. The
beer is simply great!
After Prague, my next choice would be Rome. Great scenery, interesting
museums, wonderful food, fantastic gelato, and enjoyable cafes,
Wooden cats are the best kind. . .
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
CAVEAT: Cat theme photo - don't look if you are easily offended by cats or
anything to do with them.
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/mailboxes/catbox.html
APS sensors are currently the minimum resistance route. Hopefully
when the digital dust settles and the sales are plummeting the
manufacturers are forced to come up with real value for money, that
being full frame DSLRs. Even P keeps its options open with a couple
of full frame digital
Of what is it composed? I understand that it used to include calcium
fluorite, but apparently that stuff caused other problems and something
else is used now. Anyone know?
I don't know what glass formulations Pentax used in it's ED elements
however I
doubt that they would have been
From: Ryan Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2004/11/02 Tue PM 02:42:21 GMT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: Travel suggestions
Considering the few votes for Prague, I went to do some light research. Came
across a few cautions about personal safety. Something which seemed to come
up
I'm always a sucker for cat pics, I like orange cats, and especially like
close-ups. So, this one's a double bonus for me ;-))
Not sure about the decal, although I think it was something like a bow that
was weathered and partly coming off the mailbox. That's what it seems to
be when I look at
1-Why did you buy a Pentax *istD.
I wanted a digital SLR, and had lots of Pentax lenses.
Yes: Optio S
3-Did you compare printed quality of the D to scanned images before and
or after the purchase?
To some extent. I'm very happy with the quality.
4-What problems have you had with the D?
No
Mark Roberts wrote:
For now I will stay away from the Pentax DAs except
for the 16-45/4 that came with the D.
I'm going to avoid expensive DAs because I don't want to have a D'oh!
moment when I buy the full-frame digital in a few years. But with the
investment Pentax and others are making
For a lot of reasons that I won't go into, because I'd have to use some
math, and explain some physics, (which would require
using my brain, the last thing I want to do no an election day), and
some assumptions of the actual average resolving power of
35mm film, the Holy Grail of digital
Thanks. Do you know if ACDSee supports PEF files?
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 2. november 2004 15:54
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: Image Organizer
Jens Bladt wrote on
I bet you'll read about pickpockets everywhere in the world. I've been
warned about pping for new york, central america, hamburg, egypt and
usually had no problem when I got there.
Of course if you are not careful you will lose equipment, but that does
even stand true for my quiet cozy little
Thanks for the replies, guys. I now go kick myself for not realising in the
first place that it would only affect the infinity focusing...d'oh!
In fact you will still be able to use it with a full frame Pentax - just
that the edges of the frame will be black.
Maybe this will bring in a new era during which format decisions will go
beyond square or rectangular but also be circular as APS lenses get used
more and more on full frame bodies!
Hello Mishka
I admit to not having printed the taget in 600ppi, just 300ppi on an office
printer - so the target is a bit rusty.
(I am consiodering odering an official test sheet (19 USD), showing all 5
or 9 USAF tagets on the same poster).
The print quality of the tagets is's on source of error.
For those waiting for the DS DS40/2.8 pancake ...
-- Original Message --
From: Martin, Michelle__PAIC_Mkt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 08:48:59 -0700
Watch for DS by end of November/early December. The lens is up in the air..
But you may
You didn't give enough warning...
Still it's a great shot, as is most usual you take the most mundane
object and find a way to make it art.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Was sending this to my sis, thought, what the heck, I'll try posting it
here. My last three never got to the list, maybe this will.
På 2. nov. 2004 kl. 16.34 skrev Sam Jost:
Mark Roberts wrote:
For now I will stay away from the Pentax DAs except
for the 16-45/4 that came with the D.
I'm going to avoid expensive DAs because I don't want to have a D'oh!
moment when I buy the full-frame digital in a few years. But with the
Gee, Peter, I'm usually accused of taking art and turning it into something
mundane LOL Thanks for your kind words
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You didn't give enough warning...
Still it's a great shot, as is most usual you take the most mundane
I have spent the last 5 minutes checking out BreezeBrowser. It's actaully
also a RAW converter. The features are somehow similar to those of Phase One
LE. I haven't done any conversion yet, but the tools seem fine - the
sharpning tools seem even better than Phase One (Unsharp Mask). What I miss
Yeah, Tallinn, Estonia... I´m going to Tallinn tomorrow.
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
- Original Message -
From: Mishka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 2:18 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Travel
I don't see corporations as being interested in investments, so much as they
are interested in making profits.
The real issue will be whether you're satisified with an APS-sized sensor
camera when you want a FF one. And in my mind, whether APS-matched lenses
will get any more use after a FF
There are arguments for both sides of the electoral college debate. I
personally think that it does what it was intended to do, namely, try to
distribute power equitably among the states. We have to remember that
the framers of the constitution of the USA intended the federal
government to
COSTCO's featured cameras on their website include two Optios, the MX
and the S5i
Original Message
Subject:Featured Cameras at Costco.com for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 17:12:45 -0800
From: Costco News [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Costco News
I stopped at a local camera store yesterday and the *ist-D is now a
special order item.
They used to have a fairly extensive Pentax selection, not long ago Now
just the ZX-60.
They have just about every Canon still made in stock however...
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
COSTCO's featured cameras on
Jens Bladt wrote on 11/2/2004, 10:38 AM:
Thanks. Do you know if ACDSee supports PEF files?
I think the pay version does but you have to get an optional plug-in
that costs $$$ and may not be worth it from what I've read.
Basically, I use the Pentax PhotoBrowser and PhotoLab to look at RAW
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/mailboxes/catbox.html
Very good, first class in fact.
Malcolm
ACDSee 7.0 does
- Original Message -
From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 11:38 AM
Subject: RE: Image Organizer
Jens Bladt wrote on 11/2/2004, 10:38 AM:
Thanks. Do you know if ACDSee supports PEF files?
I think the pay
Hi Peter,
You're much better versed in the technical details than myself. Interesting
the way things really work, eh? Thanks for the clarifications.
In general, I was attempting to make the point... well now I can't
remember... :)
Tom C.
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: RE: USAF target and resolution tests
Anyway, it's not possible to actaully PRINT 98 lpm from a neg. Only
the film
(or slide) can produce this kind of resolution.
Even this is unlikely in pictorial applications.
Do a quick check of the Fuji
Thumbs Plus 6 or 7 (not Pro) is giving me problems reading PEF files (I
can't seem to set this up..), perhaps the Pro version can, but I can't find
that version. BreezeBrowser it very convenient/good overview, but does
apparently not support database functions/searching for my own key words
As I said, Byzantine. You have to look at it in perspective, the United
States was only the second Republic, (semi-Democratic Federal Republic
at that), to come into existence since the fall of the Roman republic,
(a bit less than 2000 years). The only other Republic, which strangely
enough
Jens,
ThumbsPlus also requires a cameraRaw plug-in to display PEF.
You can download from here:
http://www.cerious.com/digicam_notes.shtml
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 7:31 PM
Subject: RE: Image
OK, I'll bite...
GW - one of those Leica R5's in camouflage colors - you know why.
John Kerry - Has to be the most expensive Nikon he can find to look good.
John Edwards - Another Nikon, but a digital PS for him - he's a lawyer...
Dick Chenney - Same old Nikon F1 he has been using since the 60's.
Thanks.
I don't undserstand your note about a pictorial application (1000:1),
William?
All I really want is to be able to jugde my lenses - before or after
purshase...:-). Since I mainly shoot digital now, I want to use my *ist D
for thesting the lenses. And I want to be able to choose the right
Thans Jostein.
I actually never succeeded in making this plug in work in Photoshop 6
(home), but in CS (at work) it does. I will soon get CS at home as well,
because it's still leagal to have a copy at home as well, provided the two
applications are not used simultaniously.
So do you use Thumbs
Ah yes. The fourth definition of Byzantine was eesentially my point.
of, relating to, or characterized by a devious and usually surreptitious
manner of operation
Tom C.
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Last-minute
Jostein.
I forgot to say BreezeBrowser does batch RAW conversion FYI. I don't know if
Thumbs Plus does that. Anyway I use Phase One LE for RAW conversion. I just
want a beter organizer (yhan Windows XP) with a database function,
preferebly compaitble with PS Document info (Like FotoStation has).
Hi,
Tuesday, November 2, 2004, 6:51:18 PM, Peter wrote:
As I said, Byzantine. You have to look at it in perspective, the United
States was only the second Republic, (semi-Democratic Federal Republic
at that), to come into existence since the fall of the Roman republic,
(a bit less than 2000
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Usual thanks to Adelheid and Ostein :-)
I second that!
:-D
Gianfranco's pic is wonderful and easily my favourite this
month. The
feeling and passion of a shot seem to flow instinctively fro
this guy's
photography. Why can't I shoot pics like that ?!?! Simply
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Posing by Gianfranco Irlanda - Cotty opined that this is the
best shot
of this month's gallery, and I don't see that I can disagree.
The
framing of the skylight is amazing, the partial silhouette
(which
allows us to see some detail of the actor's face
Iceland has had its legislative assembly, the Althing, operating
continuously since 930, and has functioned locally as a democracy since
then, despite being joined with Norway and then with Denmark for parts
of its history.
Bob W wrote:
As I said, Byzantine. You have to look at it in
I'm happy with CF. Never had worries about size, handling or losing them.
(just my 2 cent)
Sam
- Original Message -
From: Collin Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One of the issues that many digital photographers have told
me about is the small size of all, including CF, memory modules.
The plugin doesn't work for Photoshop, only in ThumbsPlus. The raw
converter for Photoshop is a different story all together. The
ThumbsPlus converter works quite nicely for viewing purposes, but not
much more, imo.
The reason I use both ThumbsPlus and C1 is that they are quite
complimentary.
One problem with all the PEF-enabled browsers, AFAIK, is that they
will not write additional EXIF info into the files. ThumbsPlus can do
it for other file types, and so can BreezeBrowser, I think.
The reason I picked ThumbsPlus over BreezeBrowser was the support for
offline archives. However, I
My original seems to have been lost in the ether, so a slight reprise:
It's no worse than anywhere else. Carry a stout monopod if you feel
insecure.
mike
Sam Jost wrote:
I bet you'll read about pickpockets everywhere in the world. I've been
warned about pping for new york, central america,
Ryan Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Was just looking at some places in Europe to go as a side trip
for a couple
of days on my trip to Europe. Have been offered Dublin,
Munich, Frankfurt,
Vienna, Amsterdam, Berlin, Paris, Rome, Zurich, Edinburgh,
Helsinki, Madrid,
Copenhagen, Prague as a free
I don't see any advantage in this. There already is a standard bus
in many of the cameras - CF. But some manufacturers aren't using it;
they chose SD instead (and other manufacturers use both). Expecting
camera makers to standardise on yet another interface is a pipe dream.
I don't want a
Try Bergen or Stockholm!
Gianfranco Irlanda wrote:
I think Edinburgh and Copenhagen are the more
expensive of the lot, though).
Bergen was lovely, I'd really like to go there again - just need to inherit
or win a fortune to do that :)
Sam
- Original Message -
From: Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 10:02 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Travel suggestions
Try Bergen
From: Ryan Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2004/11/02 Tue AM 07:52:50 GMT
To: PDML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: Travel suggestions
Was just looking at some places in Europe to go as a side trip for a couple
of days on my trip to Europe. Have been offered Dublin, Munich, Frankfurt,
Not going to advise you but, if you are going towards Edinburgh let me
know; I'm at a convenient place for a stopover and can show you some
interesting things. That includes all nuances of interesting..
Might I get some hints what area you are talking about? I'll come across
Edinburgh next
Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jostein.
I forgot to say BreezeBrowser does batch RAW conversion FYI. I don't know if
Thumbs Plus does that.
Yes it does. I've been trying out the evaluation version and I like it
quite a bit. Batch conversion is very convenient. I find I can run the
batch
On 2 Nov 2004 at 16:58, Jens Bladt wrote:
Hello Mishka
I admit to not having printed the taget in 600ppi, just 300ppi on an office
printer - so the target is a bit rusty. (I am consiodering odering an
official test sheet (19 USD), showing all 5 or 9 USAF tagets on the same
poster).
Doubling
Jostein
It would have been *so* neat to be able toopen PEFs in C1 from ThumbsPlus.
Isn't it they other way 'round. To define an image editor (like Phase One)
in Thumbs Plus? Other programs work like that i.e. Irfan View.
The plugin doesn't work for Photoshop, only in ThumbsPlus.
Sorry - I know -
Sorry about how little the people in the boat were in the photo. They looked
bigger when I submitted it... I guess I'm saying I didn't realize how much
smaller the pictures would be on the web.
Red Life Vests by Thrainn Vigfussen - well, I really had to strain
to see it, and it took several
Christian.
Do you know if ACDSee supports/is compatible with document info, which can
be typed in to Photoshop aplications. I knopw Fotostation does.
I already like ACDSee a lot. The shots look great on the screen and it can
do amazing stuff.
Where do you store your images and database?
I really
On 2 Nov 2004 at 21:03, Jostein wrote:
Interestingly, since I bought C1 and ThumbsPlus, I use Photoshop a lot
less. Not sure if I could have done without, but it's certainly not my
most important imaging software anymore.
Hi Jostein,
I have been talking with Dario regarding PEF RAW
Jostein.
I just checked ACDSee - it allows for configuring/adding annother (external)
image editor. It's amzing ThumbsPlus doesn't - it's not exactly a cheap
application, is it?
Cheers
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Jostein
Brilliant shot. Would perhaps make a nice poster or greeting card/post card.
It must be sell-able!
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 2. november 2004 15:26
Til: [EMAIL
Hi,
Tuesday, November 2, 2004, 9:47:32 PM, Sam wrote:
Not going to advise you but, if you are going towards Edinburgh let me
know; I'm at a convenient place for a stopover and can show you some
interesting things. That includes all nuances of interesting..
Might I get some hints what
Jens Bladt wrote on 11/2/2004, 5:13 PM:
Christian.
Do you know if ACDSee supports/is compatible with document info,
which can
be typed in to Photoshop aplications. I knopw Fotostation does.
I already like ACDSee a lot. The shots look great on the screen and it
can
do amazing
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 22:11:37 +, Thrainn Vigfusson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry about how little the people in the boat were in the photo. They looked
bigger when I submitted it... I guess I'm saying I didn't realize how much
smaller the pictures would be on the web.
Thrainn,
I hope you
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 06:26:01 -0800, Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Was sending this to my sis, thought, what the heck, I'll try posting it
here. My last three never got to the list, maybe this will. It's innocuous
enough ... also shows bokeh for K105/2.8 However, when viewed at a
On 2 Nov 2004 at 23:29, Jens Bladt wrote:
Jostein.
I just checked ACDSee - it allows for configuring/adding annother (external)
image editor. It's amzing ThumbsPlus doesn't - it's not exactly a cheap
application, is it?
I wouldn't be so disparaging, ThumbsPlus allows Load, Edit and Print
Even if you specify in ThumbsPlus that PEF files should be opened in
C1, it won't work. C1 doesn't respond to attempts to open it by it's
associated file types.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 11:09 PM
Sure!
This mail address can't take 13Mb attachments, though. Hopefully
there's some link I can download it from?
Btw, any directions, or just C1 autopilot?
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 12:14
ThumbsPlus does allow you to. It's C1 that is the problem.
J.
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 11:29 PM
Subject: RE: Image Organizer
Jostein.
I just checked ACDSee - it allows for configuring/adding annother
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: Re: USAF target and resolution tests
Thanks.
I don't undserstand your note about a pictorial application
(1000:1),
William?
When you measure resolution, what you are doing is determining how
fine a detail the optical system can see.
Test
Don't know if it was true. I have read that Nikon was the first to develop
ED element and used on 300/2.8 in 1972 to compete against the Canon fluorite
element. Pentax Olympus have licensed from it since. Unlike fluorite
element, ED element has the weakness of producing slightly cooler colour,
1 - 100 of 158 matches
Mail list logo
