Am 31.03.2014 00:35, schrieb cybermass:
Hi. I am a bit unclear about how email works in a closed domain from roaming
clients (SASL auth clients).
If there is a postfix server that is configured to only accept and send
email to users in the same domain, say for example
j...@restricted.com
Am 31.03.2014 01:54, schrieb cybermass:
Interesting, that is something I never even thought of
why should a server hosting example.com relay a to him
submitted message from a...@example.com to b...@example.com
trough a foreign server?
what should that foreign server do with that message
other
Am 31.03.2014 02:07, schrieb cybermass:
587 is dedicated for submission but is it any different if I have
configured smtps to be port 8809 and just have the clients use that port
with STARTTLS instead of 587?
technically you can use whatever port but why not
use standars and make users life
Am 31.03.2014 02:35, schrieb Shawn Zaidermann:
The way I had assumed it earlier was the client authenticates via 993
(dovecot IMAP in our case), crafts an email
to another user and this email is delivered instantly via lmtp (in our case,
dovecot LDA), but now I see that in
reality, the
Am 30.03.2014 01:10, schrieb Peter:
On 03/28/2014 10:16 AM, Adam Moffett wrote:
I'm seeing messages occasionally where the envelope sender is a
verifiable address at someone else's domain, but the from: header
contains some non-existent user @ our local domain.
This is a very bad idea, to
Am 28.03.2014 20:33, schrieb Pau Peris:
I think everything was working fine but after update main.cf http://main.cf
file i'm seeing the following warning
for emails incoming outside the box, postfix/smtpd[15455]: warning:
restriction
`reject_authenticated_sender_login_mismatch' ignored: no
Am 28.03.2014 22:43, schrieb Bruce Sackett:
I am running into a problem where I have a poorly configured SMS system
sending through the mail server. The
messages are delivered properly, but then the sender receives a warning
message:
Failed to deliver to ‘email account SMTP
://main.cf should stay after removing
the sasl params and how should master.cf http://master.cf look please?
Thank u so much!!
Sent from my Android mobile, excuse the brevity.
On Mar 28, 2014 10:21 PM, li...@rhsoft.net mailto:li...@rhsoft.net
li...@rhsoft.net mailto:li...@rhsoft.net
wrote
#reject_authenticated_sender_login_mismatch
Sent from my Android mobile, excuse the brevity.
On Mar 29, 2014 12:30 AM, li...@rhsoft.net mailto:li...@rhsoft.net
li...@rhsoft.net mailto:li...@rhsoft.net
wrote:
sorry, you need to read manuals and try some things at your own
if you can't handle it why do you
Am 27.03.2014 18:52, schrieb Pau Peris:
If i try to spoof email/sender address through Mozilla Thunderbird i get the
same error message as the one when
relaying u...@example.com mailto:u...@example.com: Sender address
rejected: not owned by user us...@example.com
mailto:us...@example.com;
can you please stop top-posting and using HTML on lists?
what is bad with HTML? look at the quote below after convert you message to
plain
Am 27.03.2014 19:53, schrieb Pau Peris:
i didn't configure mynetworks because i mynetworks_style is set to host. I
thought
it was right thing to do to
PLEASE LEARN TO USE YOUR MAIL-CLIENT AND HOW TO QUOTE
* do not top post
* do not post HTML
* do not reply only to your own questions while you refer to answers
* if you continue that way of posting i just ignore you
this is a completly unreadable thread in the meanwhile
that below is hardly a
the problem is that you can't control what the client expects
there are a lot of clients, recent and outdated
rule of thumbs:
avoid all that domain-specific crap in caes of mail and just
use and communicate mail.yourdomain.tld indepdendent what
domains you are hosting - that scales and works in
Am 25.03.2014 12:48, schrieb Scott Wilcox:
Mar 25 12:32:03 aeson postfix/smtpd[24981]: connect from
mail-wi0-f176.google.com
http://mail-wi0-f176.google.com[209.85.212.176]
Mar 25 12:32:03 aeson milter-greylist: smfi_getsymval failed for
{daemon_port}, using default smtp port
Mar 25
, 2014 at 11:52 AM, li...@rhsoft.net mailto:li...@rhsoft.net
li...@rhsoft.net
mailto:li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 25.03.2014 12 tel:25.03.2014%2012:48, schrieb Scott Wilcox:
Mar 25 12:32:03 aeson postfix/smtpd[24981]: connect from
mail-wi0-f176.google.com
http://mail-wi0-f176
Am 24.03.2014 20:54, schrieb Pau Peris:
I'm wondering why are you setting the following policies under recipient
restrictions
and not under sender restrictions? Maybe it's more efficient?
reject_non_fqdn_sender
reject_unlisted_sender
reject_authenticated_sender_login_mismatch
because
Am 22.03.2014 10:29, schrieb Pau Peris:
The issue here is mail.domain.com http://mail.domain.com is responsible of
sending email for domain.com
http://domain.com but not *.domain.com http://domain.com so the latter
are not DKIM signed and obviously are
not valid recipient addresses as
Am 22.03.2014 08:58, schrieb Sense Zeng:
proftpd version: 1.3.4a
mod_sftp version: 0.9.8
nice but how is that a postfix topic?
using reject_unknown_sender_domain.
Thank you so much.
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 11:21 AM, li...@rhsoft.net mailto:li...@rhsoft.net
li...@rhsoft.net
mailto:li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 22.03.2014 10:29, schrieb Pau Peris:
The issue here is mail.domain.com http://mail.domain.com
http
Am 22.03.2014 16:59, schrieb Anonymous12:
How can I relay mail via riseup.net?
You need to be using starttls before it allows you to login
then just enable TLS, these days that should be done anyways
http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html
Am 22.03.2014 17:04, schrieb Anonymous12:
22.3.2014 18:02, li...@rhsoft.net kirjoitti:
Am 22.03.2014 16:59, schrieb Anonymous12:
How can I relay mail via riseup.net?
You need to be using starttls before it allows you to login
then just enable TLS, these days that should be done anyways
Am 22.03.2014 17:45, schrieb Anonymous12:
22.3.2014 18:17, li...@rhsoft.net kirjoitti:
Am 22.03.2014 17:04, schrieb Anonymous12:
22.3.2014 18:02, li...@rhsoft.net kirjoitti:
Am 22.03.2014 16:59, schrieb Anonymous12:
How can I relay mail via riseup.net?
You need to be using starttls before
Am 22.03.2014 18:01, schrieb Anonymous12:
22.3.2014 18:57, Drizzt kirjoitti: 22.3.2014 18:17, li...@rhsoft.net
kirjoitti:
Am 22.03.2014 17:04, schrieb Anonymous12:
22.3.2014 18:02, li...@rhsoft.net kirjoitti:
Am 22.03.2014 16:59, schrieb Anonymous12:
How can I relay mail via riseup.net
Am 22.03.2014 19:41, schrieb Anonymous12:
22.3.2014 20:02, Viktor Dukhovni kirjoitti:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 07:58:15PM +0200, Anonymous12 wrote:
apt-cache search sasl
suggests that libsasl2-2 may be what you need.
There are additional mechanism-specific packages with various SASL
Am 22.03.2014 19:57, schrieb Anonymous12:
22.3.2014 20:48, li...@rhsoft.net kirjoitti:
Am 22.03.2014 19:41, schrieb Anonymous12:
22.3.2014 20:02, Viktor Dukhovni kirjoitti:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 07:58:15PM +0200, Anonymous12 wrote:
apt-cache search sasl
suggests that libsasl2-2 may
Am 22.03.2014 20:08, schrieb Anonymous12:
22.3.2014 21:04, li...@rhsoft.net kirjoitti:
Am 22.03.2014 19:57, schrieb Anonymous12:
22.3.2014 20:48, li...@rhsoft.net kirjoitti:
Am 22.03.2014 19:41, schrieb Anonymous12:
22.3.2014 20:02, Viktor Dukhovni kirjoitti:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 07
Am 22.03.2014 21:47, schrieb Anonymous12:
package: libsasl2-modules
This package provides the following SASL modules: LOGIN,
PLAIN, ANONYMOUS, NTLM, CRAM-MD5, and DIGEST-MD5 (with DES support)
ok, you are even too lazy to read what others googled for you
just install libsasl2-modules
Am 22.03.2014 22:02, schrieb li...@rhsoft.net:
break:
openssl s_client -starttls smtp -crlf -connect mail.riseup.net:587
shows after the SSL stuff and the EHLO command that the other
host supports LOGIN / PLAIN, so i am somehow out of ideas
did you *really* restart postfix and try again
Am 22.03.2014 22:08, schrieb Anonymous12:
22.3.2014 23:06, li...@rhsoft.net kirjoitti:
uhm you posted that line in your postconf -n output
smtp_tls_policy_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/tls_policy
besides a complete log what is the content of that file?
is there anything related
Am 21.03.2014 18:47, schrieb Ignacio Garcia:
I wish I could send an automated notification upon receiving emails from a
couple of domains. for example, let's
assume those domains are hotmail.com and gmail.com. What I need is, everytime
my users receive a message from
either
Am 20.03.2014 12:24, schrieb ML mail:
That's actually the guide I have followed but I thought there must be
something missing because I alwayse get the
following Access denied error message:
Mar 20 12:22:38 debian postfix/submission/smtpd[18467]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
from
Am 20.03.2014 13:11, schrieb ML mail:
Sorry about that. Here below is the output of a postconf -n:
append_dot_mydomain = no
biff = no
config_directory = /etc/postfix
default_transport = smtp
inet_interfaces = all
inet_protocols = all
mailbox_command = procmail -a $EXTENSION
why do you still post in HTML?
Am 20.03.2014 13:16, schrieb ML mail:
Sorry my fault, it is working now! I have forgotten to add user
authentication into my mail client for testing :(
and that is what i said in my first reply:
that is only one log line - where is the evidence that the sender
Am 20.03.2014 17:01, schrieb mizuki:
I'm running Postfix-2.6.6 which is the version coming with latest Redhat6 and
we have firewall in between the
public network and campus so we have conduits 465 opened for sending emails
from outside networks. All mail clients
work fine except the mail
Am 20.03.2014 17:32, schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
smtpd_tls_key_file = /etc/pki/mail/private/hostkey.pem
smtpd_tls_mandatory_ciphers = high
I would leave this at medium, otherwise you're disabling RC4,
which is the best cipher available on older Windows systems
(Windows XP)
Windows XP is
Am 19.03.2014 15:19, schrieb Drew Mazurek:
I have an application that sends and receives email. I don't want to have it
process bounces, though, so I'd like
its dedicated Postfix relay to forward all mailer-daemon messages to me
rather than to the application. In other
words, I'd like to
just don't switch to top-posting in the middle of a thread
Am 19.03.2014 19:57, schrieb Drew Mazurek:
Rewriting the envelope sender address at the first hop out of the application
seems to work best. Next question:
is it possible to log what the address was before it gets rewritten? Our
Am 19.03.2014 20:08, schrieb Tout Guy:
I set up postfix + dovecot and know that I want to have mailing lists I
decided to install mailman.
Everything is working except that I cannot send emails to my mailing list
(and this is quite important, don't you
think?).
When I'm sending a
as lonf you are talking about pickup there is no port
involved at all and no smtp/smtpd setting is relevant
because it's just not SMTP
Am 19.03.2014 20:49, schrieb Tim Prepscius:
I'm looking through the docs of sendmail, seeing how I can get it to
send to a specific port. But not seeing it.
...@rhsoft.net li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
as lonf you are talking about pickup there is no port
involved at all and no smtp/smtpd setting is relevant
because it's just not SMTP
Am 19.03.2014 20:49, schrieb Tim Prepscius:
I'm looking through the docs of sendmail, seeing how I can get it to
send
Am 18.03.2014 16:09, schrieb Ben Johnson:
A daily rkhunter scan produced the following warning, which mentions Postfix.
Is this a false-positive?
Warning: Network TCP port 47107 is being used by /usr/lib/postfix/proxymap.
Possible rootkit: T0rn
Use the 'lsof -i' or 'netstat
Am 18.03.2014 16:38, schrieb Wietse Venema:
Now, look for SELINUX warnings.
Or see if the warning goes away with:
/etc/selinux/config: SELINUX=disabled
and
$service selinux restart
selinux is not a service
Am 18.03.2014 22:21, schrieb Sergei:
Is there a way to announce and allow unencrypted smtp authentication (AUTH
LOGIN) only from 127.0.0.1?
I want Roundcube (webmailer) to use the users credentials when sending mail
for them and for performance reasons this should not require TLS. But
Am 17.03.2014 12:36, schrieb Alexandre Ellert:
Some of our customers have bad malling practices and I want to limit the max
number of Cci recipient.
I already use smtpd_recipient_limit but I would like to use a lower value for
Cci.
Do you know how can I achieve this using Postfix?
on SMTP
Am 15.03.2014 11:08, schrieb Tim Smith:
I have a few users who just want their email forwarded onto GMail Accounts
however these users seem to receive an
inordinate amount of spam and so I get a message from Google in my logs
stating:
/Feb 7 09:39:53 xxx postfix/smtp[15191]:
Am 16.03.2014 01:53, schrieb Karl Klein:
when I run the security test on http://www.emailsecuritygrader.com, I always
get a -
for AUTH Required (port 587). To get a +, the descriptions says:
Your system requires authentication (AUTH) on port 587 before the MAIL FROM
command is issued
Am 13.03.2014 14:42, schrieb Pol Hallen:
Hi all, I need an advice about my mx-backup server
main mail server has many antispam system (amavis, spamassassin, etc.),
when an email bounced by these antispam, the email goes to mx-backup
server. mx-backup server keep email inside own queue.
Am 13.03.2014 14:46, schrieb li...@rhsoft.net:
Am 13.03.2014 14:42, schrieb Pol Hallen:
Hi all, I need an advice about my mx-backup server
main mail server has many antispam system (amavis, spamassassin, etc.),
when an email bounced by these antispam, the email goes to mx-backup
server. mx
Am 13.03.2014 21:08, schrieb Pol Hallen:
There's evidence that some spammers reverse-sort MX records,
intentionally sending to the backup MX first. Consequently, the
backup MX /must/ have anti-spam controls identical to the primary.
But consider if you truly need a backup MX. Most folks
Am 12.03.2014 12:06, schrieb tejas sarade:
I want to allow a machine with dynamic IP address but static hostname through
DynDNS.
I know that hostname in smtpd_client_restricions works only through reverse
DNS lookup.
Is there any way, I can allow the client based on hostname which has
Am 12.03.2014 12:58, schrieb tejas sarade:
how should that be possible?
the hostname the client pretends?
how could you trust that?
how could you trust any hostname?
there is nothing else trustable than the connecting real IP
No. Not the hostname that client pretends, I am talking
about
Am 11.03.2014 14:33, schrieb jmct:
mime_header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/mime_header_check
regexp:/etc/postfix/mime_header_check is unavailable. open
/etc/postfix/mime_header_check: No such file or directory
and the file /etc/postfix/mime_header_check exists?
Am 10.03.2014 17:58, schrieb Eduardo Ramos:
I'd like to know if it's possible translate a bounce message as:
Original:
fabiana.ci...@a1.net: User has moved to fabiana.ci...@a2.net
Translated
fabiana.ci...@a1.net: Usuário movido para fabiana.ci...@a2.net
please don't do that even if you
Am 07.03.2014 22:32, schrieb Jay G. Scott:
That is, I deliberately banish all references to NIS from
main.cf. (I might need the NIS client libraries to compile
and link but I don't care about that.) postfix does not
(in that case) use NIS for anything, right? I could firewall
the ports
Am 08.03.2014 01:11, schrieb Glenn English:
Secure Renegotiation IS supported
Compression: zlib compression
Expansion: zlib compression
let me guess: BSD as operating system
there where a lot of posts recently that this is a problem
honestly you should always disable compression in con text
Am 06.03.2014 18:04, schrieb Adam Moffett:
Two steps eliminated this problem for us:
1) Accounts with more than 6 failed login attempts in a 10 minute period are
disabled for 10 minutes. This makes
brute force methods to find passwords almost impossible.
that is fine
2) Limit to 200
Am 04.03.2014 14:19, schrieb Matthias Egger:
Can somebody point me to the propper direction on how to solve this?
What we have:
* secret...@ee.ethz.ch has bought a long time ago some software where
she regulary receives hidden (to the public) download links for upgrades.
* Secretary has
Am 04.03.2014 17:55, schrieb Mike McGinn:
I ma getting some backscatter problems lately.
I used to have the line:
reject_unknown_reverse_client_hostname,
in my smtpd_client_restrictions but I commented it out because an important
client is on a microsoft cloud and had been having problems
Am 03.03.2014 15:44, schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt:
The error mesage being one of:
TLS is required, but host %s refused to start TLS: %s
TLS is required, but was not offered by host %s
TLS is required, but our TLS engine is unavailable
%s: TLS is required but unavailable, don't
Am 03.03.2014 23:45, schrieb Jay G. Scott:
I have one user telling me that he has a long mailing list
(on the order of 34 -- hardly long) and some of the recipients
bounce. If he mails them one at a time the mail works -- so
the addresses are okay.
What else should I tell you?
the
Am 02.03.2014 01:08, schrieb Rick Zeman:
Howdy, I'm trying to set up a Mac version of postfix (2.9.4) as a mail
gateway. It's been many years since I've
set up a postfix instance, and being extremely rusty I've gotten myself
stuck. I've got things working so that
mail destined for
Am 27.02.2014 19:28, schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:48:47PM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
Peer Heinlein:
You got it. That's what we ARE doing and that's why I'm asking for. :-)
Well this is a very non-standard deployment. I have to spend my
limited cycles wisely on
Am 26.02.2014 02:25, schrieb DTNX Postmaster:
On 26 Feb 2014, at 00:54, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 26.02.2014 00:46, schrieb DTNX Postmaster:
On 26 Feb 2014, at 00:29, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 25.02.2014 17:41, schrieb Dirk Stöcker:
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014, Viktor Dukhovni wrote
Am 26.02.2014 07:33, schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:54:37AM +0100, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
The local resolver can have the resolvers on the LAN configured as
forwarders, but you need the local stub resolver. No reason not to have
one, really, especially on a busy
Am 26.02.2014 12:48, schrieb Wietse Venema:
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
Yes, of course. In practice, for most users, the local resolver
is by far the simplest configuration.
Is or will this be enforced by Postfix in some way for DANE?
Postfix does not parse /etc/resolv.conf
so can we then
Am 26.02.2014 12:57, schrieb Wietse Venema:
li...@rhsoft.net:
Am 26.02.2014 12:48, schrieb Wietse Venema:
lst_ho...@kwsoft.de:
Yes, of course. In practice, for most users, the local resolver
is by far the simplest configuration.
Is or will this be enforced by Postfix in some way for DANE
Am 26.02.2014 17:30, schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
no - the two dns servers are already in the LAN and working
they are trusted and if i do not trust my own LAN i also can
not trust a forwarder running on 127.0.0.1 asking them
Without an anti-spoofing firewall, remote name servers may be able
Am 26.02.2014 23:59, schrieb Quanah Gibson-Mount:
Fiddling with how Zimbra sets some variables that get pushed to postfix, and
trying to determine if transport_maps
is order dependent.
I.e., are these equivalent:
transport_maps = lmdb:/opt/zimbra/conf/postfix/postfix_discard_domains,
Am 25.02.2014 10:09, schrieb Birta Levente:
On 25/02/2014 11:02, Andreas Schulze wrote:
Birta Levente:
Yes, but you sould give some reason why is bounced ... which IMHO is
something permanent ...
good point!
# postbounce queue-id reason
so you just set up one time some map and no more
Am 25.02.2014 17:41, schrieb Dirk Stöcker:
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
smtp_dns_support_level = dnssec
was enough to fix this. I'll see how many servers will have a
Verified connection in the future.
I hope you read the note about the importance of having 127.0.0.1
and/or
Am 26.02.2014 00:46, schrieb DTNX Postmaster:
On 26 Feb 2014, at 00:29, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 25.02.2014 17:41, schrieb Dirk Stöcker:
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
smtp_dns_support_level = dnssec
was enough to fix this. I'll see how many servers will have a
Verified
Am 23.02.2014 19:22, schrieb Pol Hallen:
Hi all :-) I'm searching for how notify by email the mail queue... (if
there're emails inside queue). Any idea?
will not help much if it's too late and you reveive
no mails at all but in most caes enough to realize
that there is a problem growing
Am 23.02.2014 23:57, schrieb Dirk Stöcker:
Seems Postfix still need to learn a lot about secure connections
seems you need to do so
in case of opportunistic there is not real trust
trusted in case of a secure connection means both sides know each
other - opportunistic means the other side
Am 24.02.2014 01:16, schrieb Dirk Stöcker:
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
smtp_tls_verify_certs=whenpossible
SMTP is not HTTP. Due to MX indirection, peer authentication is
not possible without explicit per-destination configuration. Once
you've gone to all that trouble,
Am 21.02.2014 11:37, schrieb BONNET, Frank:
Since I activated SMTP TLS ( client and server = may ) on our mail gateway I
have this message in maillog
Untrusted TLS connection established to ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
http://ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM[173.194.66.27]:25: TLSv1
with cipher RC4-SHA
Am 21.02.2014 11:58, schrieb Robert Schetterer:
Am 21.02.2014 11:37, schrieb BONNET, Frank:
Hello
Since I activated SMTP TLS ( client and server = may ) on our mail
gateway I have this message in maillog
Untrusted TLS connection established to ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
Am 20.02.2014 14:46, schrieb Luigi Rosa:
Feb 20 12:27:28 services postfix/smtpd[3054]: connect from
unknown[205.201.129.15]
Feb 20 12:27:29 services postfix/smtpd[3054]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
unknown[205.201.129.15]: 450 4.1.8
Am 19.02.2014 16:56, schrieb pgala:
In dovecot i use plugin quota exceeded to inform sender about no delivered
mail if somebody send internal mail. My problem is that dovecot send
information about no delivered messages to envelope_sender instead header
from. I try force dovecot to use
is two things
1: the responsible admins resignation
2: ensuring his/her replacement upgrades to something modern
On 16/02/2014 07:43, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 15.02.2014 22:37, schrieb SW:
Yes, you are correct. That is the cause of the problem. A quick entry of my
machine
Am 15.02.2014 22:30, schrieb SW:
I can't see the -D option anywhere in my master.cf file. I think this issue
was occurring before trying that anyway. I have also restarted the Postfix
service.
host 192.168.0.10
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
that is the problem
I
Am 15.02.2014 22:37, schrieb SW:
Yes, you are correct. That is the cause of the problem. A quick entry of my
machine in the hosts file sorted that one out!
I'm just baffled why I have never experienced this issue before
because you did not care about network details
if your used
Am 15.02.2014 22:40, schrieb SW:
Also, why is it when I send an email from my mobile phone its instant? In the
maillog it says unknown for my phones IP address so clearly there isn't a
DNS name for it.
Just trying to understand this.
because some nameserver registered for the PTR of your
Am 13.02.2014 10:46, schrieb template.mob...@gmx.de:
How does the sender_bcc_maps mechanism exactly works? Does it
react on mail body header fields like return-path? Is it in
detailed documented somewhere? Can we prevent sender_bcc_maps
from reacting on the return-path field?
which field
Am 13.02.2014 18:03, schrieb Roman Gelfand:
I am using this parameter to send message to be filtered by dspam.
However, I want local email to bypass dspam and go directly to mail
box server over lmtp.
I am not sure why the pcre code below doesn't work for local email.
Am 12.02.2014 14:46, schrieb Daniel Pocock:
On 12/02/14 14:12, Wietse Venema wrote:
Daniel Pocock:
I'm trying to work out what is a sensible configuration for servers
without local delivery.
http://www.postfix.org/STANDARD_CONFIGURATION_README.html#null_client
I'm familiar with that, it
Am 12.02.2014 14:53, schrieb L. D. James:
On 02/12/2014 08:02 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
L. D. James:
I have this in the log:
-
Feb 11 21:42:41 hera5 postfix/smtpd[4802]: connect from
localhost.localdomain[127.0.0.1]
Feb 11 21:42:41 hera5
Am 12.02.2014 15:26, schrieb L. D. James:
On 02/12/2014 09:01 AM, li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 12.02.2014 14:53, schrieb L. D. James:
On 02/12/2014 08:02 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
L. D. James:
I have this in the log:
-
Feb 11 21:42:41 hera5 postfix
Am 12.02.2014 16:33, schrieb L. D. James:
On 02/12/2014 10:14 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:06:48AM -0500, L. D. James wrote:
Thanks again for the input. When I post how I resolved the issue,
The only issue is that you have not understood how to read your
logs
Am 12.02.2014 21:04, schrieb Dave Johnson:
Any ideas on how I can sort sort below?
how do you imagine that?
you refused to post postconf -n
please re-read the welcome message
Feb 12 10:24:48 mail postfix/smtpd[17207]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
unknown[196.14.170.132]: 450 4.7.1
SALES@
Am 11.02.2014 13:13, schrieb fleon:
i disabled NTLM with sasl_mechanism_filter = !ntlm but of course now i get an
error that the server offered no compatible authentication mechanism
When i telnet to my exchange server i only get:
STARTTLS
X-ANONYMOUS TLS
AUTH NTLM
X-EXPS GSSAPI NTLM
Am 11.02.2014 13:31, schrieb fleon:
Hello, can you please put your relevant main.cf, /etc/postfix/generic,
etc/postfix/sasl/sasl_passwd (or the file you set up in main.cf),
/etc/aliases and maybe a syslog entry after doing a test with
/usr/sbin/sendmail?
all database configuration
Please
Am 11.02.2014 20:01, schrieb Viktor Dukhovni:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:36:54AM -0800, fleon wrote:
I have this in my main.cf (note: i didn't set this up, my guess is that
debian itself did, or maybe when i installed libsasl2-modules, but i don't
think so)
smtpd_tls_cert_file =
Am 11.02.2014 21:15, schrieb fleon:
FINALLY it worked, but not before i disabled NTLM in the config, because
otherwise it would try it.
as said in my first reply uninstall the NTLM module
as long you have no damned good reason to install it
in case of the distributions i work with it is a
Am 10.02.2014 16:33, schrieb Jelle de Jong:
I have a dual stack IPv6/IPv4 postfix server that been running on
debian stable quite happy.
postfix/smtpd[15247]: warning: hostname localhost does not resolve to
address ::1: No address associated with hostname
1. should I be worried?
2. why
Am 10.02.2014 19:39, schrieb fleon:
I added the debug command you requested so you can see the whole error. I
don't seem to have dns issues so i haven't felt the need for the brackets. I
do seem to have the NTLM module
uninstall the NTLM module
on my Fedora machines i had the same until yum
Am 09.02.2014 12:32, schrieb Pol Hallen:
External sasl authentication works, I need force users to authentication
from localhost (i.e. CMS joomla and wordpress).
inside main.cf:
before:
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, 192.168.1.0/24
after
#mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8, 192.168.1.0/24
Am 07.02.2014 16:26, schrieb LuKreme:
On 07 Feb 2014, at 01:12 , Stefan Michael Guenther s.guent...@in-put.de
wrote:
The problem is, that our client wants to send emails with the sender domains
of his clients from his own postfix server.
There is no legitimate reason to do this. In
Am 07.02.2014 22:51, schrieb LuKreme:
On 07 Feb 2014, at 09:16 , li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 07.02.2014 16:26, schrieb LuKreme:
On 07 Feb 2014, at 01:12 , Stefan Michael Guenther s.guent...@in-put.de
wrote:
The problem is, that our client wants to send emails with the sender
domains
Am 06.02.2014 14:41, schrieb Konstantin:
I have postfix-2.10.2 with milter and amavis as smtpd_proxy_filter installed.
All information stored in database and at 1st min of each hour domains and
recipients copied to local files. Then
postmap command performed.
don't run postmap just for fun
Am 06.02.2014 22:17, schrieb Norton Allen:
I think a key point here (for me anyway) is that smtpd_recipient_restrictions
do
not apply to mail delivered from localhost because they presumably don't use
SMTP.
Is that a correct understanding?
yes because smtpd_ means what it says
601 - 700 of 861 matches
Mail list logo
