I'd suggest using the afterFinish callback to hide the element.
tr.fade({ afterFinish : function(fx){ fx.element.remove() } });
http://github.com/madrobby/scriptaculous/wikis/core-effects
On Sep 16, 6:51 am, ericindc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried it with tr.remove( ) as well and it was
Greetings Brent,
Its not that Prototype has somehow neglected this aspect, but
simply the fact that an input type='file' cannot be transferred as you
have expected. Its value is a path, not the source of the file
itself. There are very strict rules on this input type for security
Have an observer method assigned to the primary selects elements
select event. The observer method executes an ajax.request. Have
the onSuccess handler rebuild the secondary select element with the
options returned from the request.
On Sep 19, 4:33 am, jason maina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Your this scope is lost inside the this.exito method. You need to
use a closure, via the bind method to ensure the instance's reference
is maintained in the asynchronous callbacks.
onSuccess : this.exito.bind(this)
On Sep 22, 10:14 am, Miguel Beltran R. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know
Instead of relying on the object's style, just give it a class that
you can filter on, that enforces the style of a blue background.
$$(.blue[name='pmt'])...
On Sep 24, 9:41 am, kangax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 24, 7:31 am, ColinFine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 24, 1:06 am,
You could improve performance a little bit by skipping the each and
using invoke. You'd have to modify some of the stuff, such as your
declaration of section_id but it wouldn't be too difficult to convert.
$$(a.more).invoke(observe, click, function);
http://prototypejs.org/api/enumerable/invoke
A very good idea, something I had pondered as well but never came up
with a solution I was satisfied with.
First problem with your scenario is you're sending in a string as the
superclass, this isn't going to work regardless. You could use new
Element('div') but this is going to create a static
There is a trailing comma in your object that IE doesn't like,
considering a syntax error. Remember when evaling something that the
expression you're evaluating has to have perfect syntax as well.
On Sep 28, 12:39 pm, uncleroxk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok my JSON:
{messages: {message:[
I like to apply a background image to the input for such cases, that
way the input's value is untouched yet the UI can indicate the purpose
of the field. Also with an image your watermark can be a faded grey,
further indicating its transparent presence.
On Oct 2, 9:40 am, Christophe Porteneuve
Looks like you're going to need more data in the checkbox. As you're
going to need the ID as well i'd leave that as is. But you can add an
extra attribute to help with this calculation.
input name=invoiveID[] value=?=$invoiceID? price=?=
$invoicePrice? type=checkbox /
Javascript has no
I take it you're trying to handle the back button, take a look at my
approach, detailed in this article,
http://positionabsolute.net/blog/2007/07/javascript-history-service.php
On Oct 9, 3:19 pm, Mauro Marchiori Neto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i guess i need to uptate the location.hash so
Ditch the iframe object in favor of a DIV and things will work much
smoother..
On Oct 10, 12:17 pm, Miguel Beltran R. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list
I have the next code but not work, iframe show nothing
what I doing wrong?
html
...
body
div id=content
div id=form_search
I built some stuff, i wouldn't consider it a very robust datagrid
control but I did develop two classes to deal with some basic datagrid
stuff.
GridBase is an abstract class that propagates events like rowover/
cellover stuff like that for handling highlights.
Apply a more specific class to the top level element that you wish to
make sortable.
On Oct 14, 7:57 am, Lapis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I hope someone has a good idea that can help me here.
I do Sortable.create(...) on some element (div class=block /) and
pass tag: 'div' and only:
, though.
Still thankful for any ideas, workarounds or pointers.
/P
On Oct 14, 10:27 pm, Matt Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apply a more specific class to the top level element that you wish to
make sortable.
On Oct 14, 7:57 am, Lapis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I hope
Try Googling around for lazy loading its the idea you're talking
about...
http://ajaxpatterns.org/On-Demand_Javascript
We should write an extension for proto that does this nicely, I
checked out http://www.scripteka.com/ and there is a lazy loading tag
but unfortunately nothing with loading
Its because he's referencing the object through the options array,
Proto never gets to sink its method into the object because of this
traversal, while the other browsers support native extensions it works
fine.
$($(Birth_Day).options[0]).remove();
On Oct 20, 8:55 am, delishus [EMAIL
You could do this a variety of ways, using prototypes $$ method you
could quickly select all form tags. Alternatively native JS dom has a
quick reference to such a collection, via document.forms.
As a side note, you'll want to point the onload to a reference of your
function, not the result of
onDrop : handleDrop.bind(this);
..
handleDrop : function(e){
this.setDragItem(...);
}
http://prototypejs.org/api/function/bind
On Oct 27, 2:24 pm, Kris S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When creating behavior classes using lowpro, how can i reference the
parent class while in a child
Are you holding a reference to an object inside the iframe? Such as
contentDocument/contentWindow. These references would be bunk once
the iframe refreshes.
On Oct 29, 4:31 am, Thomas A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our application is built on a static interface with HTML controls and
an Iframe
Very strange, not sure if i understand completely. So there is an
internal iFrame object that is getting references from its containing
document object. When the iframe reloads it no longer has these
references? Wouldn't a reload of the iframe force it to retrieve fresh
references as everything
Effect.Slide needs an immediate child to perform the clipping
necessary for the effect.
On Oct 31, 9:56 am, Paul Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the solution David. Do you have any idea why this worked for
Opera when the ul element wasn't encapsulated inside a div element? -
Paul
What are the drawbacks of requestings the JS file via Ajax.Request and
stuffing the responseText inside the innerHTML property of a generated
script element?
Does it have the global scope restriction like eval?
Does it cause a processing bottle neck for the client?
Is it supported by all
A little lost on what the question is, but I took an assumption and
ran with it. The idea of stacking these methods was intriguing.
Check out this code, its pretty useless really but an interesting
example of object ownership and function delegation.
var MyClass = function(){
this.name
A little lost on what the question is, but I took an assumption and
ran with it. The idea of stacking these methods was intriguing.
Check out this code, its pretty useless really but an interesting
example of object ownership and function delegation.
var MyClass = function(){
this.name
$(main_content).fade({ duration : 1.6, afterFinish : function(fx){
fx.element.update(img src='spin2.gif'/);
fx.element.appear({ duration : 1.0 });
}
On Nov 12, 10:32 am, Walter Lee Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Use a queue, or create a new hidden image over top of the old and
fade
Well if you're request method is GET and you're looking in POST, there
could be some issues, make sure you're using and expecting the same
method type on the client and the server.
On Nov 18, 7:56 am, James Hoddinott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm stumped again :( I have the following HTML which
Instead of trying to keep the last reference to the XHR sent, just
enforce a singleton style approach, such that the user can't request a
refresh of data when a request is already pending.
function fireAjax(){
if(Ajax.activeRequestCount == 0)
new Ajax.Request(...);
}
new parent.Ajax.Updater('target', './refresh.php5, { method:
You're sending a string, try using a direct object reference...
var ele = window.document.getElementById('target');
ele.innerHTML = Loading...;
new parent.Ajax.Updater(ele, './refresh.php5, ...
On Nov 17, 4:37 pm, ronman [EMAIL
but it didn't.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Matt Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
new parent.Ajax.Updater('target', './refresh.php5, { method:
You're sending a string, try using a direct object reference...
var ele = window.document.getElementById('target');
ele.innerHTML
No, its all POST methods being used here.
new
Ajax.Updater('respanel','data/fetchrespanel.php',{method:'get'});
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To
What is going wrong with your current approach, should be no reason
you can't generate a new TR element and replaceChild on the tbody
object...
On Nov 20, 11:46 am, jason maina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to replace a whole row with new data/controls without
interfereing
Hmm, I've double checked this idea, I have no problems with replacing
a TR element.
element.parentNode.replaceChild(content, element) = element is null
I'd have to make the assumption that your trId value doesn't correlate
to an ID of any element in the document.
On Nov 21, 12:06 pm, jason
To elaborate on Kangax's idea, a DOM element is a dynamic object,
being that you can add custom properties which can be referenced for
further processing...
var ele = new Element(div);
ele.eventHandles = { click : handleClick, mouseover :
handleMouseOver };
ele.observe(click,
You could try different variations of the declaration, maybe it just
doesn't like that format. Also note that you're not setting a unit
for your value, this could be considered an invalid declaration?
you could try...
margin:0px;
margin-left:auto;
margin-right:auto;
It should be able to
Oh wow...
Hate to be the bearer of bad news Ryan, but not really
You can attach an event listener to an area object, which you could
attempt to harness a fade, but that would require you to make a lot of
edits to the image maps. Secondly, the entire page is one image, if
you take this
What do I make wrong
Many things...
script
var a = new Element('div', {id: 'my_div'});
$('my_div').style.witdh = '200px';
/script
/head
-You create an element, but never attach it to the DOM.
-Even if you did attach it, the DOM wouldn't be ready at that point in
execution, you've
Why would you want to avoid position:absolute for an object which
needs to sit on top of everything in the center of the document?
On Nov 22, 6:10 am, Dave L [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been struggling to get the DOM popup kit, which uses prototype,
to display popups and modal dialog
A lot of JS is being executed, listening to scroll is like listening
to mousemove, the event fires often. Scrolling up and down your page
might fire off more than 100 scroll events, in combination with this,
you're executing an effect each time the event is fired, furthermore
the Effect
You're sample data isn't really a range though is it? Why would you
want to use an instance of ObjectRange over a regular Array?
--
http://positionabsolute.net
On Nov 24, 12:14 pm, T.J. Crowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S : Oh and by the way, I can't post from my mail software. My mails
No idea if this works or not, but a quick search on Google has
produced an almost identical question and answer to your issue.
http://chumby.net/2008/10/27/scriptaculous-sortablecreate-onupdate-event-isnt-firing/
--
http://positionabsolute.net
On Nov 22, 4:53 pm, patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You could create your slider with a range of 0 - array.length -1.
Then use that value as an index to your actual data array in the
onSlide/onChange events
On Nov 26, 3:10 am, Nicolas Cavigneaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le 25 nov. 08 à 22:14, Matt Foster a écrit :
You're sample data
I'd say your DOM traversals might add quite a bit of weight to your
filter. Why select the LI element if you're really looking at its
child A element's innerHTML property ?
Select those nodes and skip the execution of down, should speed things
up quite a bit.
Also if you're using a text input
Try
Event.observe(tre, click, this.RowClick.bindAsEventListener(this));
On Dec 1, 9:15 am, Mauricio Díaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have an iFrame that contains a page with my scripts, and I want to
show a popup dialog in the parent window. I can insert my popup (a div
element
By using the keyup event you can avoid the conditions to check for
change, if the user has pressed and released a key on the input then
the value has changed. Also it is very wise to add the timeout, your
users will thank you.
document.observe(dom:loaded, function() {
var list = $$(#listAll
This is why I like using an Ajax Service it creates a central
instance in which all requests are generated and processed through
http://positionabsolute.net/blog/2007/07/javascript-service.php
On Nov 13, 5:45 am, matte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Yes it is more straight forward but
Try ending the statement with a semicolon, it is probably hitting the
syntax error there.
var stuff = eval('(function(){ ... });');
On Dec 4, 1:59 pm, yoshi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i think u guys are assuming firefox, in IE eval without the function
wrapped in () does not cause syntax
Hey Everyone,
Granted this is off the topic of prototype development
directly, it will lead into it in the end. I am writing an ajax
library that i'd like to A) stand alone B) work with prototype and C)
work with Extjs. I'd like to put the code in Google Code and have it
available for
You could also listen to those events on the input, and stop their
propagation so that the document never hears of them.
On Dec 15, 7:06 am, Stucture_Ulf maximilian.moulet...@gmail.com
wrote:
Great, I got it! Many thanks.
On Dec 15, 12:35 am, Gabriel Gilini gabr...@usosim.com.br wrote:
I like the idea of modularity, which would be more practical for your
environment. I have written an article on how Ajax.Request could be
modified to accommodate for a timeout event. Feel free to read the
article / source code. I wouldn't really recommend it for your live
site but its perhaps
The text node can only exist within one div, it's not a quantum
particle happily living in superposition across all five.
I love it, what a brilliant way to put it.
On Dec 12, 12:08 pm, T.J. Crowder t...@crowdersoftware.com wrote:
Hi Cyrus,
The text node can only exist within one div,
Double check for any console.logs you may have in your code.
Lingering debugging code has caused me a few headaches in the past.
On Dec 22, 3:05 pm, pedz pedz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 22, 1:33 pm, Diodeus diod...@gmail.com wrote:
You could make Ajax calls back to a logging system on the
Any reason in particular you couldn't use application/x-www-form-
urlencoded for your contentType?
On Dec 19, 1:12 pm, Dalzhim Dalzhim dalzhim.ml...@gmail.com wrote:
I finally found out what was the problem with this multipart POST
which wasn't working. After many hours of investigation, I
Its because FF allows for native prototype extension and IE does not,
such that any referenced element won't have proto's element extension
methods until its been explicitly extended.
a href=# onclick=$(this).up('.bla').remove()Back/a
But to be honest I wouldn't use that style of event
Browser is opening save dialog and saveing the response into an .xls file.
So your scripts are writing to the clients machine?
Is the data being received over an XHR request?
It wouldn't be the most fluid progress bar, but if it was an XHR you
could increment a progress bar each time it moves
You could use a canvas element or SVG elements.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Drawing_Graphics_with_Canvas
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/SVG
Prototype doesn't have much support for either of these options but
they're viable and you could use event listener/dom traversal with the
SVG
Hey Everyone,
I'm working on a project that swaps out text nodes. I need to
save a reference to the new text node with the existing node. In FF I
am able to set custom properties no problem, IE however throws an
error of Object does not support this property or method. I was
thinking I
If you're traversing a collection of elements, then the first
parameter in your findAll method is going to be an element.
Bind is a property of a Function, not an Element, so that it would be
failing on this attempt of execution.
http://prototypejs.org/api/function/bind
--
You can pass it an element reference, however your reference of this
isn't an element. It may have assumed element methods via
Object.extend in your constructor but the reference is still to a
function, not a DOM reference.
--
http://positionabsolute.net
On Jan 8, 12:04 pm, Ian R
It appears as though without accepts its values in individual
parameters. Looking at the documentation it does illustrate that each
value is set in as its own parameter.
http://prototypejs.org/api/array/without
Looking into the source it becomes clear that it uses the function's
arguments as
This is completely theoretical, and probably even more ludicrous as I
think of it being plausible cross-browser...
But in theory if you did something like this
var A = function(){ alert(First definition);}
A();
var A = function(){ alert(Second definition); };
A();
Would behave as such, so
You should rely more on the Effect.Morph to handle the animations and
less on your own setTimeout calls, I think its compounding multiple
timeout calls and morph effects which run their own intervals to
manage the effect. Try getting the effect to run with one call to
Effect.Morph.
--
Event.stop(e) does indeed prevent event propagation. I would assume
that your code is hitting an exception before Event.stop is being
executed.
Try calling Event.stop() at the very beginning of the script, before
anything else, then if there are no errors, call event.form.submit()
to carry
Hmm maybe I am not understanding what you're interface is trying to
accomplish...
If you've got a strip of images that you want to scroll across based
on mouse movements, why don't you just wrap them in a div with an
overflow and modify the scrollLeft property of the div to modify the
display.
$(ifr).observe(beforeunload, Event.stop);
Give it a whirl, I have no idea if that will work;
---
http://positionabsolute.net
On Mar 18, 5:27 am, Vladimir Tkach tea...@gmail.com wrote:
try to use beforeunload event
2009/3/18 Karlson azagnio...@gmail.com
Hi,
I am trying to
, Matt Foster mattfoste...@gmail.com wrote:
$(ifr).observe(beforeunload, Event.stop);
Give it a whirl, I have no idea if that will work;
---
http://positionabsolute.net
On Mar 18, 5:27 am, Vladimir Tkach tea...@gmail.com wrote:
try to use beforeunload event
2009/3/18 Karlson azagnio
After reviewing the behavior of the control I'd say it reinforces the
idea that you should just set it up in a scrolling div and modify the
scroll property, this would approach would alleviate much of the
intense processing. You could leverage the Effect.Tween[1] method to
handle most of the
, Alex Mcauley webmas...@thecarmarketplace.com
wrote:
There is no exception or error thrown in firebug !!
I went round it with an inline call instead !
Thanks for help guys
Alex
- Original Message -
From: Matt Foster mattfoste...@gmail.com
To: Prototype script.aculo.us
I've got to add my two cents as well,
For addressing the issue of attaching parameters to the Ajax.Request
object, they're actually available in the callbacks. Each callback
gets sent an Ajax.Response instance which contains the request
property which in turn has the parameters property,
Were the injected stylesheets being loaded, did you check it with
firebug? Also with firebug you should inspect the control's elements
and see if they're inheriting these properties and or if any of them
are being overridden by another selector. IE and FF have major
differences with links/hrefs
I don't really understand the logic,
You have multiple forms on a particular state in your ajax
application. If the user takes action to change this state you want
to prompt them with the confirm window of Changes have been made, are
you sure you want to discard? If they click yes- i want to
Yeah I'd say thats a pretty good approach, if you've got 8 active
requests then the timeout duration of the 9th should be affected by
the number of currently active predecessors. I'd do something in the
onCreate method to just set the instance's timeout universally instead
of trying to
Ooo to be honest, that is quite ugly Amlan...
Having a ton of code written to an inline handler is just bad form, it
would be much better to just delegate to an event handler, and even
better yet, hook into this event via Event.observe...
$(category).observe(change, handleChange);
You'll have
class and super are reserved words that we actually never use, but
think of them as words like _if_ or _case_
Use className as the appropriate property for setting the HTML
attribute of class, a bit hoaky but that is just the way it is, with
or w/o prototype...
Anath's idea would be ideal but I am not sure how supported that event
actually is.
Alternatively, it'd be a bit more work but still would satisfy your
event requisite of just firing off you own event when you update.
var oldHTML = ele.innerHTML;
ele.update(text);
ele.fire(x:update, { oldHTML
What are you sending to PHP's json_encode? It is expecting a
structure to serialize into a JSON syntax string.
$struct = array(message = h1Hello World/h1Who says we can't
have any kind of \quotes\ we want?);
echo json_encode($struct);
If you try to run json_encode on your already JSONified
Hey Brent,
Do you have a demo page that displays this issue? My only
thoughts are that the elements are getting reloaded in the DOM yet not
getting the events attached.
--
http://positionabsolute.net
On Apr 29, 2:59 pm, BrentNicholas brentnicho...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
So I
Just to have fun with it...
var val = $F(file);
if(val.lastIndexOf( ) val.lastIndexOf(/))
On Apr 29, 2:52 pm, Walter Lee Davis wa...@wdstudio.com wrote:
Aha, but what about spaces in folders leading up to that filename? I
don't mind those, since I only end up with the file, not the
I'd set up each class or major structure, such as Element, Enumerable,
etc etc as its own file, then define packages such as minimal,
efficient, advanced, ajax...etc. Then in a server side script it will
bundle these files together depending on the package so you could make
a request something
In looking at your code, there were a few HTML mistakes.
First your try me element doesn't have a proper closing div tag its
just /div no greater than to close the tag.
You've also does this on your input buttons, input objects are
considered simple, meaning they have no children, so having a
Another good one is www.mindmeister.com, I doubt they've got an API
for you to work with but maybe you can get some ideas. Its built with
Proto/scripty, but they use a canvas object instead of SVG so it could
be a bonus for your IE requirement.
--
http://positionabsolute.net
On May 5,
I think he's looking for a snippet handout, by the looks of the
spaghetti that he's pasted he's trying to highlight a single item in a
menu.
var activeElement = false;
$$(ul.menu li).invoke(observe, click,
function(e){
var element = e.element();
if(activeElement)
var test = ['foo', 'bar', 'foob'];
if (test.any(element.hasClassName.bind(element))) {
I believe using the non-methodized version of this method would be
better
Element.hasClassName.curry(element);
--
http://positionabsolute.net
On May 14, 12:30 pm, T.J. Crowder
bind for curry and it gave an error.
On May 14, 3:32 pm, Matt Foster mattfoste...@gmail.com wrote:
var test = ['foo', 'bar', 'foob'];
if (test.any(element.hasClassName.bind(element))) {
I believe using the non-methodized version of this method would be
better
You could find a list of all events and listen to them each, there
isn't an all operator to listen to any event that is fired as far as
I know...
function allYourEventAreBelongToUs(e){
console.log(You hit an event %o, e);
}
$w(load unload click dblclick ...).each(function(evenType){
What is surprising to me is that the this scope ever actually worked
inside the event handlers.
Had you left the handle alone I know that Proto would have bound the
element to the handler such that this would assume the value of the
element, but since you explicitly set this via bind in the
src changes.
The underlying problem was how to keep an iframe sized to match its
contents. While you get one onload event when the frame finishes
loading, no others are ever fired, even when you navigate to a
different page within the iframe.
Walter
On May 21, 2009, at 5:05 PM, Matt
The iframe element doesn't support any events[1].
You can indeed listen to the load event directly from the IFrame
element.
http://pastie.org/493154
The document that it contains may support various events (such as load,
click, etc.).
Why would a document inside an iframe not support these
Is there a way to initially load the page with the map open
and then close it after a timed period? Better yet, is there some way
to load it with it hidden but not chopped up?
Yeah, having it display:none or visibility:hidden can muck up the
calculations of the containers dimensions. I'd
addslashes() off, any occurence of in the
body text (eg quotes from speakers etc) breaks the code again. Does
anyone have a foolproof method?
Cheers
Matt
On Apr 24, 9:54 pm, Matt Foster mattfoste...@gmail.com wrote:
What are you sending to PHP's json_encode? It is expecting
When your event fires just get the scroll properties from the window,
Prototype has a convenient method just for this purpose.
http://prototypejs.org/api/document/viewport/getscrolloffsets
--
http://positionabsolute.net
On Jun 11, 9:30 am, Jeztah webmas...@thecarmarketplace.com wrote:
At the
I ran into this same issue and made a class to extend others from to
inherit this sort of functionality.
This is the article but the JS itself is a bit outdated
http://positionabsolute.net/blog/2007/06/event-dispatcher.php
To get the freshest JS...
. Is it the right way or not?
thanks,
rgds sven
On 29 Jun., 20:17, Matt Foster mattfoste...@gmail.com wrote:
I ran into this same issue and made a class to extend others from to
inherit this sort of functionality.
This is the article but the JS itself is a bit
outdatedhttp
You could use many of the enumerable methods, this seems a bit verbose
but gets the job done.
Enumerable.find will iterate over the collection until the iteration
function returns a value of true. I could have used each, but
potentially would have iterated more than necessary, as we'd really
(Vulnerable, {
initialize: function() {
this.health = 100;
this.dead = false;
}
});
var bruce = new Person;
bruce.wound(55);
bruce.health; //- 45
On Jul 13, 4:22 pm, Matt Foster mattfoste...@gmail.com wrote:
The second argument is accepting attributes of the HTML element
--
getStatus: function() {
try {
return this.transport.status || 0;
} catch (e) { return 0 }
}
---
so Firefox must leave the status undefined.
@ Matt Foster : i tried your patch but it didn't work for me
in an array
shouldn't automatically return length 0.
On Jul 14, 1:47 pm, Matt Foster mattfoste...@gmail.com wrote:
$A(attr.edges).each(function(edge) {
this.edge.set(id, new GraphEdge(cv, id, edge));
}, this);
edge is your variable, why bother trying to set function
Yeah I discuss the idea of having its own event for timing out in my
article. The argument is a timeout is a failure, its failed to
retrieve a response in the given time. So a timeout is basically like
an inherited event from onFailure. Question remains do you seperate
the event or just add a
,
edges: {
Brainwriting : {
color: black,
penwidth: 0.5,
fontname: Arial,
URL: javascript:void(predwin(2179)),
label: bull; ,
}
Ron
blog.ideatree.us
On Jul 14, 4:47 pm, Matt Foster mattfoste...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh I get
That is nice, you should submit it to http://scipteka.com
--
http://positionabsolute.net
On Jul 17, 4:14 am, Alex McAuley webmas...@thecarmarketplace.com
wrote:
Nice data grid! ... what about inline editing of the cells ? .. i cant get
it to work on firefox in your demo
- Original
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
