Chris Ilias nmo2@... writes:
On 11-06-15 2:13 PM, PhillipJones wrote:
That's typical of developers. If they don't use it, whether user it, it
gone be daxxxed.
Phillip, prejudice comments like that are not welcome here. In the past,
you've spread a lot of misinformation about
On 12/07/2011 01:32, Alain Alain wrote:
I'm a long-time user of Seamonkey, from since it was called Mozilla.
The recent 2.1 and 2.2 updates seem to have broken Java support on my
Centos
5.5 box (32 bits) and I really can't figure this out.
Seamonkey is installed in /usr/local.
Starting
Alain Alain wrote:
I'm a long-time user of Seamonkey, from since it was called Mozilla.
The recent 2.1 and 2.2 updates seem to have broken Java support on my Centos
5.5 box (32 bits) and I really can't figure this out.
Seamonkey is installed in /usr/local.
Starting from 2.1, the
On 11-07-07 1:13 AM, Rufus wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Guys, the gist of this discussion has been
You don't understand...
No, /you/ don't understand...
No, it's you that doesn't understand...
The discussion has gone nowhere and has gone on way too long. If you
care to continue it, please take it
On 07.07.2011 01:01, Chris Ilias wrote:
--- Original Message ---
On 11-07-07 1:13 AM, Rufus wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Guys, the gist of this discussion has been
You don't understand...
No, /you/ don't understand...
No, it's you that doesn't understand...
The discussion has gone nowhere
Interviewed by CNN on 06/07/2011 19:03, Rufus told the world:
No. You just don't understand what I'm getting at. I'm not saying
bring Mozilla to iOS. I'm saying it's not impossible to duplicate
the SM experience using WebKit.
For a given, very particular, very limited definition of SM
Rufus wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Rufus wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 17/06/2011 10:37, Rufus told the world:
Seriously - I don't care what goes on under the hood. If I can browse
with it on an iPad, it is a full browser to/for me. If Apple wants
you to use their rendering
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 06/07/2011 19:03, Rufus told the world:
No. You just don't understand what I'm getting at. I'm not saying
bring Mozilla to iOS. I'm saying it's not impossible to duplicate
the SM experience using WebKit.
For a given, very particular, very limited
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Rufus wrote:
No, I don't think *you* understand. Go to the Apple App store and do a
search on browser - you will find pages of iPad and iPhone browsers
that *directly* compete with Apples Safari browser...I may have even
found another
Rufus schrieb:
I got that a *long* time ago...in point of fact I knew that going in. A
Mozilla based app is clearly *not* what I'm asking for
And it's outside the abilities of the SeaMonkey team to produce a
non-Mozilla-based app, so please just let this thread end.
Robert Kaiser
--
Note
Rufus schrieb:
...and I'm ok with the Webkit usage requirement. Never said I didn't
believe that.
And we are unable to build a SeaMonkey based on WebKit, due to requiring
XUL for our current code and not being able to re-write the whole app on
something else due to resource constraints (and
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
...and I'm ok with the Webkit usage requirement. Never said I didn't
believe that.
And we are unable to build a SeaMonkey based on WebKit, due to requiring
XUL for our current code and not being able to re-write the whole app on
something else due to
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
I got that a *long* time ago...in point of fact I knew that going in. A
Mozilla based app is clearly *not* what I'm asking for
And it's outside the abilities of the SeaMonkey team to produce a
non-Mozilla-based app, so please just let this thread end.
Rufus wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
I got that a *long* time ago...in point of fact I knew that going in. A
Mozilla based app is clearly *not* what I'm asking for
And it's outside the abilities of the SeaMonkey team to produce a
non-Mozilla-based app, so please just let
J. Weaver Jr. wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
I got that a *long* time ago...in point of fact I knew that going in. A
Mozilla based app is clearly *not* what I'm asking for
And it's outside the abilities of the SeaMonkey team to produce a
non-Mozilla-based app, so
Rufus wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
...and I'm ok with the Webkit usage requirement. Never said I didn't
believe that.
And we are unable to build a SeaMonkey based on WebKit, due to requiring
XUL for our current code and not being able to re-write the whole app on
something else
PhillipJones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Actually, 2.3 might be something I could be interested in. Maybe. Too
many things are changing in the Mac world at once...
My big fear remains the Lion OS, it's iOS-like full screen app
implementation (which I hope I can turn off, or find a hack to turn off)
Interviewed by CNN on 05/07/2011 14:44, J. Weaver Jr. told the world:
Rufus wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
I got that a *long* time ago...in point of fact I knew that going in. A
Mozilla based app is clearly *not* what I'm asking for
And it's outside the abilities of the
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 05/07/2011 14:44, J. Weaver Jr. told the world:
Rufus wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
I got that a *long* time ago...in point of fact I knew that going in. A
Mozilla based app is clearly *not* what I'm asking for
And it's outside the
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:32:08 -0700, Rufus wrote:
No, I don't think *you* understand. Go to the Apple App store and do a
search on browser - you will find pages of iPad and iPhone browsers
that *directly* compete with Apples Safari browser...I may have even
found another one
Rufus wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:32:08 -0700, Rufus wrote:
No, I don't think *you* understand. Go to the Apple App store and do a
search on browser - you will find pages of iPad and iPhone browsers
that *directly* compete with Apples Safari browser...I may have even
PhillipJones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:32:08 -0700, Rufus wrote:
No, I don't think *you* understand. Go to the Apple App store and do a
search on browser - you will find pages of iPad and iPhone browsers
that *directly* compete with Apples Safari
Interviewed by CNN on 04/07/2011 18:16, Rufus told the world:
I do fully understand that in the case of SM I'm talking about a *brand
new* product - that certainly isn't impossible or not allowed, and
there are a whole host of non-Apple branded browsing apps on Apples
store ranging from
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 04/07/2011 18:16, Rufus told the world:
I do fully understand that in the case of SM I'm talking about a *brand
new* product - that certainly isn't impossible or not allowed, and
there are a whole host of non-Apple branded browsing apps on Apples
store
On 7/4/11, Rufus n...@home.com wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:32:08 -0700, Rufus wrote:
No, I don't think *you* understand. Go to the Apple App store and do a
search on browser - you will find pages of iPad and iPhone browsers
that *directly* compete with Apples Safari
Lee wrote:
On 7/4/11, Rufusn...@home.com wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:32:08 -0700, Rufus wrote:
No, I don't think *you* understand. Go to the Apple App store and do a
search on browser - you will find pages of iPad and iPhone browsers
that *directly* compete with Apples
Lee wrote:
On 7/4/11, Rufusn...@home.com wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:32:08 -0700, Rufus wrote:
No, I don't think *you* understand. Go to the Apple App store and do a
search on browser - you will find pages of iPad and iPhone browsers
that *directly* compete with Apples
Rufus wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 17/06/2011 10:37, Rufus told the world:
Seriously - I don't care what goes on under the hood. If I can browse
with it on an iPad, it is a full browser to/for me. If Apple wants
you to use their rendering engine, then that's just less code you
Rufus wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 18/06/2011 14:59, Rufus told the world:
No, I don't think you're understanding *me* - I'm not interested in the
Mozilla technology, I'm interested in the Mozilla *feature set*. Big,
subtle difference in that I'm thinking as a user and not a
cyberzen wrote:
MCBastos a écrit :
Interviewed by CNN on 16/06/2011 05:11, cyberzen told the world:
MCBastos a écrit :
Now and then I click on the wrong status bar icon
and open it when what I wanted was another module...
what about quitting coffee ?
Joke all you want, but those are
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Rufus wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 17/06/2011 10:37, Rufus told the world:
Seriously - I don't care what goes on under the hood. If I can browse
with it on an iPad, it is a full browser to/for me. If Apple wants
you to use their rendering engine, then
chicagofan wrote:
James E. Morrow wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
As for me, my personal priorities have changed as stated in
http://home.kairo.at/blog/2010-10/personal_priorities and I moved on,
see also http://home.kairo.at/blog/2011-05/full_time_at_csi_mozilla -
which now makes me say things
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Rufus wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 18/06/2011 14:59, Rufus told the world:
No, I don't think you're understanding *me* - I'm not interested in the
Mozilla technology, I'm interested in the Mozilla *feature set*. Big,
subtle difference in that I'm thinking
On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 17:32:08 -0700, Rufus wrote:
No, I don't think *you* understand. Go to the Apple App store and do a
search on browser - you will find pages of iPad and iPhone browsers
that *directly* compete with Apples Safari browser...I may have even
found another one that I like
Jens Hatlak wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
I'll probably get my post taken down for this, but wouldn't it be easier
to provide a compatibility check disable in about:config that actually
WORKS instead of having some of us creating hacked xpi files and others
staying with old versions because they
Philip Chee wrote:
On 13/06/2011 08:21, bern...@nospam.com wrote:
I have just installed Seamonkey 2.1 over the last version 2.0.14. In any
event something seems strange to me. The text in the browser window
looks like a printer running out of ink. The letters are there but the
text is not
CONGRATULATIONS, Seamonkey development crew, and contributing community
members. Your extraordinary work is certainly appreciated.
I am proud to be a Seamonkey User.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
James E. Morrow wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
As for me, my personal priorities have changed as stated in
http://home.kairo.at/blog/2010-10/personal_priorities and I moved on,
see also http://home.kairo.at/blog/2011-05/full_time_at_csi_mozilla -
which now makes me say things like A beta user
chicagofan wrote:
James E. Morrow wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
As for me, my personal priorities have changed as stated in
http://home.kairo.at/blog/2010-10/personal_priorities and I moved on,
see also http://home.kairo.at/blog/2011-05/full_time_at_csi_mozilla -
which now makes me say things
On 06/20/2011 01:06 PM, James E. Morrow wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
...
I'm not too far away, but not here as much as previously. And I feel
good getting less vitriol about my work and working with people who can
do Mozilla stuff full-time. ;-)
Robert Kaiser
As one who has read and
MCBastos a écrit :
Interviewed by CNN on 16/06/2011 05:11, cyberzen told the world:
MCBastos a écrit :
Now and then I click on the wrong status bar icon
and open it when what I wanted was another module...
what about quitting coffee ?
Joke all you want, but those are closely-spaced 16px
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Michael Hannon schrieb:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
In any case, happy to not be in charge any more, makes laughing about
this much easier than in earlier times.
Who's in charge now?
The collective of the SeaMonkey Council (of which I'm remaining a part,
but just as one of
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 6/19/2011 12:00 AM, Rufus wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 6/18/2011 8:40 PM, Rufus wrote:
I find that hard to believe as stated. The feature set as implemented
within the *current* releases as coded is dependent on the Gecko
engine,
but for a *new*
Keith Whaley wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 6/18/2011 8:40 PM, Rufus wrote:
I find that hard to believe as stated. The feature set as implemented
within the *current* releases as coded is dependent on the Gecko
engine,
but for a *new* product what we are talking about is
Keith Whaley wrote:
Nice analogy, MC...
keith whaley
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 18/06/2011 14:59, Rufus told the world:
No, I don't think you're understanding *me* - I'm not interested in the
Mozilla technology, I'm interested in the Mozilla *feature set*. Big,
subtle difference
Keith Whaley wrote:
Keith Whaley wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 6/18/2011 8:40 PM, Rufus wrote:
I find that hard to believe as stated. The feature set as
implemented
within the *current* releases as coded is dependent on the Gecko
engine,
but for a *new* product what we
Interviewed by CNN on 17/06/2011 22:55, PhillipJones told the world:
You do know Apple is now selling Unlocked iPhones Just announced last week.
Unlocked means not tied to a phone carrier. But it is still tied to
the Apple store, and subject to Apple's rules. It's not factory-jailbroken.
Interviewed by CNN on 17/06/2011 22:34, d...@kd4e.com told the world:
How does Midori, which ID's as Safari, fit in the mix?
I don't have any personal experience with Midori, but I understand from
the website that it depends on a separate standard installation of
Webkit, instead of bundling
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
If it's based on Safari, it won't be Seamonkey. To develop a Gecko
browser, it would be restricted to jailbroken devices. There's simply
not enough users, not enough developer interest to do it. If there was
interest, somebody would be doing it -- Mozilla is fully free
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 17/06/2011 10:37, Rufus told the world:
Seriously - I don't care what goes on under the hood. If I can browse
with it on an iPad, it is a full browser to/for me. If Apple wants
you to use their rendering engine, then that's just less code you have
to
PhillipJones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
It's not really a case of Apple not allowing it - it's more a case of
developers embracing, stepping up, and coding. There are a number of
alternative browsers for iPad, the most popular (I can see why) being
the Atomic
Bill Davidsen wrote:
I'll probably get my post taken down for this, but wouldn't it be easier
to provide a compatibility check disable in about:config that actually
WORKS instead of having some of us creating hacked xpi files and others
staying with old versions because they can't or won't?
Rufus schrieb:
...so, Microsoft redux...big deal - Apple's turn. They make a product
which suits my desires. So I'll buy it and use it...I don't really care
about much more than that, from a user standpoint.
So then you have no right to want anything their app store doesn't
provide. They
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 21:55:15 -0400, PhillipJones wrote:
If it's based on Safari, it won't be Seamonkey. To develop a Gecko
browser, it would be restricted to jailbroken devices. There's simply
not enough users, not enough developer interest to do it. If there was
interest, somebody would be
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 03:18:06 -0400, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
If it's based on Safari, it won't be Seamonkey. To develop a Gecko
browser, it would be restricted to jailbroken devices. There's simply
not enough users, not enough developer interest to do it. If there was
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
...so, Microsoft redux...big deal - Apple's turn. They make a product
which suits my desires. So I'll buy it and use it...I don't really care
about much more than that, from a user standpoint.
So then you have no right to want anything their app store
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 03:18:06 -0400, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
If it's based on Safari, it won't be Seamonkey. To develop a Gecko
browser, it would be restricted to jailbroken devices. There's simply
not enough users, not enough developer interest to do
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 03:18:06 -0400, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
d...@kd4e.com wrote:
If it's based on Safari, it won't be Seamonkey. To develop a
Gecko browser, it would be restricted to jailbroken devices.
There's simply not enough users, not enough developer interest
to do
Interviewed by CNN on 18/06/2011 14:59, Rufus told the world:
No, I don't think you're understanding *me* - I'm not interested in the
Mozilla technology, I'm interested in the Mozilla *feature set*. Big,
subtle difference in that I'm thinking as a user and not a coder, and I
also realize this
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 18/06/2011 14:59, Rufus told the world:
No, I don't think you're understanding *me* - I'm not interested in the
Mozilla technology, I'm interested in the Mozilla *feature set*. Big,
subtle difference in that I'm thinking as a user and not a coder, and I
On 6/18/2011 8:40 PM, Rufus wrote:
I find that hard to believe as stated. The feature set as implemented
within the *current* releases as coded is dependent on the Gecko engine,
but for a *new* product what we are talking about is a set of design
requirements and interface specifications - not
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 6/18/2011 8:40 PM, Rufus wrote:
I find that hard to believe as stated. The feature set as implemented
within the *current* releases as coded is dependent on the Gecko engine,
but for a *new* product what we are talking about is a set of design
requirements and
On 6/19/2011 12:00 AM, Rufus wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 6/18/2011 8:40 PM, Rufus wrote:
I find that hard to believe as stated. The feature set as implemented
within the *current* releases as coded is dependent on the Gecko engine,
but for a *new* product what we are talking about
Interviewed by CNN on 16/06/2011 22:44, Rufus told the world:
That's simply not true. I have the Atomic browser installed on my iPad
and like it...and there are others.
Atomic is not a full browser either. It does not include its own
rendering engine, but uses the iOS Safari one.
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 16/06/2011 22:44, Rufus told the world:
That's simply not true. I have the Atomic browser installed on my iPad
and like it...and there are others.
Atomic is not a full browser either. It does not include its own
rendering engine, but uses the iOS Safari
Rufus schrieb:
It's not really a case of Apple not allowing it - it's more a case of
developers embracing, stepping up, and coding. There are a number of
alternative browsers for iPad, the most popular (I can see why) being
the Atomic browser - somewhat SM-like, and far more feature-rich than
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
It's not really a case of Apple not allowing it - it's more a case of
developers embracing, stepping up, and coding. There are a number of
alternative browsers for iPad, the most popular (I can see why) being
the Atomic browser - somewhat SM-like, and far
Interviewed by CNN on 17/06/2011 10:37, Rufus told the world:
Seriously - I don't care what goes on under the hood. If I can browse
with it on an iPad, it is a full browser to/for me. If Apple wants
you to use their rendering engine, then that's just less code you have
to write. The fact
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 17/06/2011 10:37, Rufus told the world:
Seriously - I don't care what goes on under the hood. If I can browse
with it on an iPad, it is a full browser to/for me. If Apple wants
you to use their rendering engine, then that's just less code you have
to
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Jens Hatlak wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
I tried QuoteCollase several Times, and iI always ended up with a wide
bar at the bottom where the status bar would be be bout 2 long and
width of the screen. After removing it I would have to remove chrome
file (which I have
Jens Hatlak wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
I tried QuoteCollase several Times, and iI always ended up with a wide
bar at the bottom where the status bar would be be bout 2 long and
width of the screen. After removing it I would have to remove chrome
file (which I have forgotten which file with SM
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 17/06/2011 10:37, Rufus told the world:
Seriously - I don't care what goes on under the hood. If I can browse
with it on an iPad, it is a full browser to/for me. If Apple wants
you to use their rendering engine, then that's just less code you have
to
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Please don't improve the user interface, the reason I like it is that I
don't have to learn all new keystrokes and methods every 4-6 months.
The improve, is in all aspects, we don't intend to break your
experiences/learned habits there where
Glen wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Jens Hatlak wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
I tried QuoteCollase several Times, and iI always ended up with a wide
bar at the bottom where the status bar would be be bout 2 long and
width of the screen. After removing it I would have to remove chrome
file (which I
Rufus wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
It's not really a case of Apple not allowing it - it's more a case of
developers embracing, stepping up, and coding. There are a number of
alternative browsers for iPad, the most popular (I can see why) being
the Atomic browser - somewhat
If it's based on Safari, it won't be Seamonkey. To develop a Gecko
browser, it would be restricted to jailbroken devices. There's simply
not enough users, not enough developer interest to do it. If there was
interest, somebody would be doing it -- Mozilla is fully free software,
after all.
How
MCBastos a écrit :
Now and then I click on the wrong status bar icon
and open it when what I wanted was another module...
what about quitting coffee ?
--
cyberzen
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
PhillipJones schrieb:
Answer me a Question. How many features have we users begged and plead
for developers to keep and they were removed anyway?
Fewer than the other way round. And the totally skewed sample of people
here in this newsgroup is only a tiny piece of the overall user base.
In
Rufus schrieb:
I was thinking
that Opera Mobile would be just the solution for iPad
You know that Opera Mobile is not a browser and actually send everything
you type in there to a central Opera server (and I'd guess that they try
to market the data they're collecting there - I would if I
Interviewed by CNN on 15/06/2011 22:41, Rufus told the world:
...OTOH, having bought an iPad recently is rapidly changing my work
flow/habits re: browsing Usenet and surfing the web - I was thinking
that Opera Mobile would be just the solution for iPad, but it doesn't
operate with Mail/News in
Interviewed by CNN on 16/06/2011 05:11, cyberzen told the world:
MCBastos a écrit :
Now and then I click on the wrong status bar icon
and open it when what I wanted was another module...
what about quitting coffee ?
Joke all you want, but those are closely-spaced 16px icons. It's not
that
Robert Kaiser wrote:
In any case, happy to not be in charge any more, makes laughing about
this much easier than in earlier times.
Robert Kaiser
Who's in charge now?
I'm sorry to hear you've stopped running the project. Thanks for your
work on the browser over the past few years (not to
So one goes from the Apple-control freaks to the Google careless-
security and spy-on-you-privacy freaks.
Should we look to Palm for hope?
That users don't need freedom of choice, father knows best attitude
is why, after careful evaluation, I chose to stay away from iOS. I'm
very happy with my
Michael Hannon schrieb:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
In any case, happy to not be in charge any more, makes laughing about
this much easier than in earlier times.
Who's in charge now?
The collective of the SeaMonkey Council (of which I'm remaining a part,
but just as one of multiple people, not as
d...@kd4e.com schrieb:
So one goes from the Apple-control freaks to the Google careless-
security and spy-on-you-privacy freaks.
Should we look to Palm for hope?
Good joke. Well, HP in that case nowadays, but still.
The only bet is to try and get some mobile vendor to go and actually
ship
PhillipJones wrote:
I tried QuoteCollase several Times, and iI always ended up with a wide
bar at the bottom where the status bar would be be bout 2 long and
width of the screen. After removing it I would have to remove chrome
file (which I have forgotten which file with SM off and the restart.
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
I was thinking
that Opera Mobile would be just the solution for iPad
You know that Opera Mobile is not a browser and actually send everything
you type in there to a central Opera server (and I'd guess that they try
to market the data they're collecting
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 15/06/2011 22:41, Rufus told the world:
...OTOH, having bought an iPad recently is rapidly changing my work
flow/habits re: browsing Usenet and surfing the web - I was thinking
that Opera Mobile would be just the solution for iPad, but it doesn't
operate
Rufus wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Rufus wrote:
[...snip...]
I've seen a quite a few positive comments, too, but I can't speak from
experience as I haven't installed it. For now, I'm sitting back and
reading, as I usually do, and will decide once I think I have enough
information.
Rufus wrote:
Jan-Galt wrote:
[...snip...]
I already was garnering the impression that I wouldn't want to upgrade
to this version just due to some of the structural changes in it that
I've been reading about here, now I'm *convinced* I don't even want to
take it for a test drive on one of my
PhillipJones wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 12/06/2011 12:14, W3BNR told the world:
So I'll be waiting for the updates to:
Download Helper
Prefbar
Quote Colors
Show IP
Mail User Agent
I wouldn't hold my breath for Display Mail
PhillipJones wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 13/06/2011 23:31, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj told the
world:
I don't bother memorizing most passwords (e-mail, websites and such) --
the unimportant ones I trust to Seamonkey, the middling-important
ones I
save in KeePass. But the ones I do
PhillipJones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Jan-Galt wrote:
Rufusn...@home.com wrote :
William DeCoster wrote:
Please relay to the seamonkey people. Composer: click on a
graphic it
duplicates and jumps up to another location, (annoying). The graphic
does delete ok,
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
So far, SM 2.1 has generated the largest number of problems/user
complaints I've ever read here regarding any version/release...and it's
only been a week or so.
Then you haven't been around much. I actually think the amount is pretty
low compared to 2.0 ;-)
Rufus wrote:
Chris Ilias wrote:
On 11-06-13 2:55 PM, Rufus wrote:
Dunno...I was hesitant about 2.0 (in fact, I think I waited until
2.0.something, but I only recall two basic complaints - and most of it
was over the Forms Manager. I feel like I'm reading more for 2.1, and of
wider
Bill Davidsen schrieb:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Ant schrieb:
I really don't want to use Sync.
For what reason? Note that all data sent to a server by Sync is not
readable by the server or its operators as it's encrypted on the client
side and the private key is never sent to the server. Of
Daniel wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 12/06/2011 12:14, W3BNR told the world:
So I'll be waiting for the updates to:
Download Helper
Prefbar
Quote Colors
Show IP
Mail User Agent
I wouldn't hold my breath for
WLS wrote:
William DeCoster wrote:
Please relay to the seamonkey people. Composer: click on a graphic it
duplicates and jumps up to another location, (annoying). The graphic
does delete ok, Never an issue before this release. Other annoying
Features Pop Up anouncements and compress email folder
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 6/12/2011 3:46 PM, WLS wrote:
The SeaMonkey people are to my knowledge not doing any development of
Composer and IMHO think it should be removed from the suite.
You are part right, there has not been much work on Composer from the
SeaMonkey team.
This is
WLS wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
On 6/12/2011 3:46 PM, WLS wrote:
The SeaMonkey people are to my knowledge not doing any development of
Composer and IMHO think it should be removed from the suite.
You are part right, there has not been much work on Composer from the
SeaMonkey team.
1 - 100 of 327 matches
Mail list logo
