]
On Behalf Of Brenda via Talk
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 9:16 AM
To: Loy <loyrg2...@gmail.com>; Window-Eyes Discussion List
<talk@lists.window-eyes.com>
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes isn't dead
Who is going to design any future Window-Eyes upgrades/versions?
It seems like most
-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
Here's one thing to think about. Microsoft will be coming out with windows
10 creative update around April. Will window-eyes work with it?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Bernard via Talk
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 1:03 PM
Here's one thing to think about. Microsoft will be coming out with windows
10 creative update around April. Will window-eyes work with it?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Bernard via Talk
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 1:03 PM
To: 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
Subject: Window-Eyes is
-eyes.com] On
Behalf Of Peter Duran via Talk
Sent: Tuesday, 31 January 2017 2:11 p.m.
To: 'Sky Mundell'; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'; 'Charles Short'
Subject: RE: Window-Eyes isn't dead
Oh yeah,
Where are the tech support personnel? Have you noticed (I guess not) that
nobody
: Vaughan Dodd via Talk
To: 'Peter Duran' ; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 8:25 PM
Subject: RE: Window-Eyes isn't dead
Peter: that is my very point.
Certainly - off list - Doug did comment to me in a purely support question
way, and I was glad to receive
undell via Talk
> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 5:30 PM
> To: 'Charles Short'; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
> Subject: RE: Window-Eyes isn't dead
>
> Go on, Charles, go on! Its still alive and it has been for over 21 years
> now and for the moment it won't be going anywhe
Of Peter Duran via Talk
Sent: Tuesday, 31 January 2017 2:11 p.m.
To: 'Sky Mundell'; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'; 'Charles Short'
Subject: RE: Window-Eyes isn't dead
Oh yeah,
Where are the tech support personnel? Have you noticed (I guess not) that
nobody from GW Micro has responded to any
] On
Behalf Of Sky Mundell via Talk
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 5:30 PM
To: 'Charles Short'; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Window-Eyes isn't dead
Go on, Charles, go on! Its still alive and it has been for over 21 years
now and for the moment it won't be going anywhere.
-Original
Go on, Charles, go on! Its still alive and it has been for over 21 years
now and for the moment it won't be going anywhere.
-Original Message-
From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+skyt=shaw...@lists.window-eyes.com] On
Behalf Of Charles Short via Talk
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 2:15 PM
...@lists.window-eyes.com] On
Behalf Of Kim Lingo via Talk
Sent: Tuesday, 31 January 2017 9:25 a.m.
To: Dave; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
The real question is this: by people going on and on about it, can they
actually _do_ anything about it? If they can, I'm
anything about it? If they can, I'm still waiting
to hedar what. If not, why not save yourselves time?
Kim Lingo
-Original Message- From: Dave via Talk
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 10:33 AM
To: wohlg...@gmail.com ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
Jim, why
To: wohlg...@gmail.com ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
Jim, why not hit that delete key, and stop posting messages that have
nothing to do with Window eyes?
Oh, you say telling some here to Not post about Window Eyes and itsFuture,
is about Window Eyes?
but talking
Does NVDA have anything to do with Window-eyes? The point is this list
is filled with "irelevant and inaccurate messages which some think,
clutter the board..
On 1/30/2017 1:33 PM, Dave via Talk wrote:
> Jim, why not hit that delete key, and stop posting messages that have
> nothing to do
Jim, why not hit that delete key, and stop posting messages that have
nothing to do with Window eyes?
Oh, you say telling some here to Not post about Window Eyes and itsFuture,
is about Window Eyes?
but talking about the future of Window Eyes is not about Window Eyes?
Sir, you have
Jee! it would certainly be nice to actually read something Window-Eyes
related instead of a bunch of sniping jiberish! I seriously believe
their is nothing dead about Window-Eyes so why don't the folks that wish
to talk about the death of W.E. create their own group. They might call
it
And AI Squared has not said anything if there will be support for windows 10
Creators update coming shortly.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Pietruk via Talk
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2017 4:06 AM
To: Nick Sarames ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
Nick
Nick
That's exactly Peter's point -- and both of you have said it in different
ways with the same meaning.
Effectively, future development of WE is no more. Granted, the PR side of
it could have been handled better; but that's a completely different
issue.
The question I have is this: the
So what's your point? In business, people come and go.
On 1/28/2017 7:26 PM, Peter Duran via Talk wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> As I mentioned before, when the people who do the work go away, then the
> company and its products suffer.
>
> All the great people who made Window-Eyes the best are
Chris,
do they pay you? Perhaps you are the only support person they have
available.
LOL
Robert
On 1/29/2017 1:39 AM, Chris Skarstad via Talk wrote:
Here, we, go, again. everyone get their delete key fingers ready,
andgo!
On 1/28/2017 7:26 PM, Peter Duran via Talk wrote:
Hello
Here, we, go, again. everyone get their delete key fingers ready, andgo!
On 1/28/2017 7:26 PM, Peter Duran via Talk wrote:
Hello again, > > As I mentioned before, when the people who do the work go away,
then > the company and its products suffer. > > All the great people who
made
gt; small percentage of the disabled community.
>
> -Original Message- From: Nick Sarames via Talk
> Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 2:19 AM
> To: Vaughan Dodd ; Window-Eyes Discussion List ; 'Bryan Peterson'
> Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
>
> Of course it would be nice to
To: Vaughan Dodd ; Window-Eyes Discussion List ; 'Bryan Peterson'
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
Of course it would be nice to have an official response from VFO, but
you're not going to get it by wining on this board. You're going to
have to find a way to exhibit some leverage, and I'm not sure that's
: Talk
> [mailto:talk-bounces+vaughan.dodd001=msd.govt...@lists.window-eyes.com] On
> Behalf Of Bryan Peterson via Talk
> Sent: Thursday, 22 December 2016 12:24 p.m.
> To: wohlg...@gmail.com; Dennis Long; Window-Eyes Discussion List
> Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
>
> Unf
com] On
> Behalf Of Tony C via Talk
> Sent: Thursday, 22 December 2016 2:43 p.m.
> To: Window-Eyes Discussion List
> Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
>
> ys, For peat's sake. Please, let's get off the window eyes is dead trip. If
> they are going to do away with it then that'
I agree.
-Original Message-
From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+dennisl1982=gmail@lists.window-eyes.com]
On Behalf Of Tony C via Talk
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 8:43 PM
To: Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
ys, For peat's sake. Please, let's get off
Message-
From: Vaughan Dodd via Talk
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 6:01 PM
To: 'Bryan Peterson' ; 'Window-Eyes DiscussionList'
Subject: RE: Window-Eyes is Dead!
I agree with Bryan's comments. Would also just like to add that it isn't
difficult for VFO to provide an up-to-date statement
: Thursday, 22 December 2016 12:24 p.m.
To: wohlg...@gmail.com; Dennis Long; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
Unfortunately the continued lack of an official answer is only going to lead to
more such speculation. As for JAWS being a very good program as someone who
used
WE
> I'm going to have to beg to differ, but that's another topic.
>
> -Original Message- From: Jim via Talk
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 12:16 PM
> To: Dennis Long ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
> Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
>
> I agree!
>
> There
-
From: Jim via Talk
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 12:16 PM
To: Dennis Long ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
I agree!
There has been no official announcement from AISquared or VFO regarding
this topic and yes, you can still call AISquared and order an SMA. So I
+dennisl1982=gmail@lists.window-eyes.com]
On Behalf Of Chris Skarstad via Talk
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2016 12:18 PM
To: Pamela Dominguez; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
until i hear an official announcement window-eyes is not dead. it's the
thread that never ends
Jaws is a very good program.
-Original Message-
From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+dennisl1982=gmail@lists.window-eyes.com]
On Behalf Of Veronica Smith via Talk
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2016 5:09 PM
To: 'Bryan Peterson'; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Window-Eyes is Dead
I agree.
-Original Message-
From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+dennisl1982=gmail@lists.window-eyes.com]
On Behalf Of Chris Skarstad via Talk
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2016 12:18 PM
To: Pamela Dominguez; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
until i hear
I agree.
-Original Message-
From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+dennisl1982=gmail@lists.window-eyes.com]
On Behalf Of Jim via Talk
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2016 12:36 PM
To: Chris Skarstad; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
You know it's rumors and gosup
Skarstad' ; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Window-Eyes is Dead!
Yes, and thanks for stating this. All the speculation is nothing until the
owners of the software say things have changed!
-Original Message-
From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+trbft=mediacombb@lists.window-eyes.com
I called not too long ago to ask about buying a esp (the zt version of a
sma) for fusion the person on the phone words were "you might wanna buy one
sooner than later. so they'll sell you a sma, we and fusion. Whether you'll
get all you paid for under vfo? i'm not counting on it but y'all can be
ssage- From: Jim via Talk
> Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2016 5:35 PM
> To: Chris Skarstad ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
> Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
>
> You know it's rumors and gosup
>
> like this that creates a great deal more problems than it actualy
>
If VFO decides to stop selling and supporting Window-Eyes because
JAWS cost more,they will lose me as a customer as I can not stand JAWS
at all! I have Narrator and NVDA as backups and WE until it won't work
anymore!
Bob, K8LR, tinn...@charter.net
On 12/18/2016 12:17 PM, Chris
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2016 5:35 PM
To: Chris Skarstad ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
You know it's rumors and gosup
like this that creates a great deal more problems than it actualy
solves. So, when we here a rumor or a tid bit of gosup we should simply
11:18 AM
To: Pamela Dominguez <geo...@optonline.net>; Window-Eyes Discussion List
<talk@lists.window-eyes.com>
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
until i hear an official announcement window-eyes is not dead. it's the
thread that never ends...it goes on and on and on and on and on
Discussion List
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
I been a window eyes user since the 90's and earlier this week I sent
support a question and still haven't heard back from them. What does
this tell you?
On 12/17/2016 6:08 PM, Jim via Talk wrote:
Hi there FOLKS!
Well I seem to have addressed this issue
it? Pam.
-Original Message- From: Russ Kiehne via Talk
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2016 9:50 AM
To: brice Mijares ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
And lets add to that. How about several employees leaving Ai
Squared. The VFO group has ask the dealers
Well then if that's true, then why are the window eyes people still selling
it? Pam.
-Original Message-
From: Russ Kiehne via Talk
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2016 9:50 AM
To: brice Mijares ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
And lets add
one on one with somebody. Pam.
-Original Message- From: brice Mijares via Talk
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2016 9:35 PM
To: wohlg...@gmail.com ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
I been a window eyes user since the 90's and earlier this week I sent
support
I never emaille support. I always get on the phone to them, so I can talk
one on one with somebody. Pam.
-Original Message-
From: brice Mijares via Talk
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2016 9:35 PM
To: wohlg...@gmail.com ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
I been a window eyes user since the 90's and earlier this week I sent
support a question and still haven't heard back from them. What does
this tell you?
On 12/17/2016 6:08 PM, Jim via Talk wrote:
Hi there FOLKS!
Well I seem to have addressed this issue just
Of brice Mijares via Talk
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2016 9:35 PM
To: wohlg...@gmail.com; Window-Eyes Discussion List <talk@lists.window-eyes.com>
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
I been a window eyes user since the 90's and earlier this week I sent support a
question and still haven't heard bac
that
>> fish. Tell me why or why not. V
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Talk
>> [mailto:talk-bounces+madison_tewe=spinn@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf
>> Of Bryan Peterson via Talk
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 3:19 AM
>> To: Tom Kingston; Pam
To be fair, a new copy of WE isn't significantly less expensive than
Jaws. That said, price was a contributing factor in my decision to
purchase WE back in 2001. Back then, I paid basically the same price
for my PC as I did for WE. The only reason PCs have gone significantly
down in price
It tells me nothing. While I admit I have rarely e-mailed "support," I
found much more success with phone support than e-mail.
On 12/17/2016 9:35 PM, brice Mijares via Talk wrote:
> I been a window eyes user since the 90's and earlier this week I sent
> support a question and still haven't
I been a window eyes user since the 90's and earlier this week I sent
support a question and still haven't heard back from them. What does
this tell you?
On 12/17/2016 6:08 PM, Jim via Talk wrote:
Hi there FOLKS!
Well I seem to have addressed this issue just a few days ago, as far as
I know
Hi there FOLKS!
Well I seem to have addressed this issue just a few days ago, as far as
I know Window-Eyes is going no where in the near or intermediate
future. I really cannot say as much for the long run. I called about
obtaining a new LTO and they are still selling them and plan to for
k
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2016 3:21 PM
To: 'Bryan Peterson' ; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Window-Eyes is Dead!
Your right about JAWS now that it is under VFO
-Original Message-
From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+skyt=shaw...@lists.window-eyes.com] On
Behalf Of Bryan Peters
; To: 'Bryan Peterson' ; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
> Subject: RE: Window-Eyes is Dead!
>
> Your right about JAWS now that it is under VFO
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+skyt=shaw...@lists.window-eyes.com] On
> Behalf Of Bryan Peters
k", I rather liked Freedom Science Fiction, or Bleed 'Em
> Scientific, or one I came up with "Free-dumb" Scientific.
> Kim Lingo
>
>
> -Original Message- From: Sky Mundell via Talk
> Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2016 3:21 PM
> To: 'Bryan Peterson' ; 'W
6 3:21 PM
To: 'Bryan Peterson' ; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Window-Eyes is Dead!
Your right about JAWS now that it is under VFO
-Original Message-
From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+skyt=shaw...@lists.window-eyes.com] On
Behalf Of Bryan Peterson via Talk
Sent: Saturday, Decem
Veronica, for me it is more of a personal thing. JAWS does a very good
job at reading screens, and in some cases it does a better job than
Window Eyes.
But, JAWS in my experience has very poor Support for its program, and
they always want Money Money Money for their latest and greatest
om Science Fiction,
or Bleed 'Em Scientific, or one I came up with "Free-dumb" Scientific.
Kim Lingo
-Original Message- From: Sky Mundell via Talk
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2016 3:21 PM
To: 'Bryan Peterson' ; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Window-Eyes is Dead!
Y
Talk
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2016 3:21 PM
To: 'Bryan Peterson' ; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Window-Eyes is Dead!
Your right about JAWS now that it is under VFO
-Original Message-
From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+skyt=shaw...@lists.window-eyes.com] On
Behalf Of Bryan Pe
Tom Kingston; Pamela Dominguez; Window-Eyes Discussion List
> Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
>
> I for one have already been working on getting more familiar with
> NVDA, mostly because for the life of me I still cannot get my version
> of WE to read documents in Word 2010 despi
Kingston; Pamela Dominguez; Window-Eyes Discussion List
> Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
>
> I for one have already been working on getting more familiar with NVDA,
> mostly because for the life of me I still cannot get my version of WE to
> read documents in Word 2010 despi
To: Tom Kingston; Pamela Dominguez; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
I for one have already been working on getting more familiar with NVDA,
mostly because for the life of me I still cannot get my version of WE to
read documents in Word 2010 despite trying the steps
is Dead!
If you think those voices are free to use, go back and look at the price of
Jaws, and then the price of update plans.
-Original Message-
From: Kenny Peyatt jr. via Talk
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 8:18 PM
To: Loy ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes
If you think those voices are free to use, go back and look at the price of
Jaws, and then the price of update plans.
-Original Message-
From: Kenny Peyatt jr. via Talk
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 8:18 PM
To: Loy ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead
t Hillary was to be the President,
>>> but not so. Might be the same with Window Eyes, everyone thinks it is
>>> dead, but no one knows.
>>>- Original Message -
>>> From: Vaughan Dodd via Talk
>>>To: 'Sky Mundell' ; 'Window-Eyes Discussion
: Vaughan Dodd via Talk
To: 'Sky Mundell' ; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 8:40 PM
Subject: RE: Window-Eyes is Dead!
There are people who do know: they are the various decision makers
who are setting the direction for all the companies in the group
: Vaughan Dodd via Talk
To: 'Sky Mundell' ; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 8:40 PM
Subject: RE: Window-Eyes is Dead!
There are people who do know: they are the various decision makers
who are setting the direction for all the companies in the group
.
Might be the same with Window Eyes, everyone thinks it is dead, but no one
knows.
- Original Message -
From: Vaughan Dodd via Talk
To: 'Sky Mundell' ; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 8:40 PM
Subject: RE: Window-Eyes is Dead
, November 30, 2016 8:40 PM
Subject: RE: Window-Eyes is Dead!
There are people who do know: they are the various decision makers who are
setting the direction for all the companies in the group. They are just not
telling the paying customers.
Vaughan.
-Original Message-
From
-eyes.com] On
Behalf Of Sky Mundell via Talk
Sent: Thursday, 1 December 2016 2:25 p.m.
To: 'Tony C'; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'; 'Pamela Dominguez'
Subject: RE: Window-Eyes is Dead!
Well nobody knows for sure if its truly dead or not. Its all just speculation.
-Original Message-
From
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
I guess the Jaws people will be going crazy now because they wiped out
window eyes. Even if it hurts the blind community as a whole.
-Original Message-
From: Pamela Dominguez via Talk
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 8:32 PM
To: Stephen Clark ; Window
: Window-Eyes is Dead!
I think there was something a few months ago. Pam.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Clark via Talk
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 8:22 PM
To: Vaughan Dodd ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
Here's another thing. When was the last
, 2016 8:13 PM
To: Kenny Peyatt jr.; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
All the Jaws users would be really upset?
On 11/29/2016 10:33 PM, Kenny Peyatt jr. wrote:
> What would happen, if the window-eyes screenreader becomes the only
> screen reader?
>
> Ken
find they have updates more often, and they are not
>>>> necessarily
>>>> as sound, as if they felt they had to start competing with jaws. Pam.
>>>>
>>>> -Original Message- From: Jim via Talk
>>>> Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2016 4:
- From: Stephen Clark via Talk
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 8:22 PM
To: Vaughan Dodd ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
Here's another thing. When was the last time there was an update to any
of the Window-eyes apps? There used to be constant improvements/updates
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
What would happen, if the window-eyes screenreader becomes the only screen
reader?
Kenny Peyatt jr.
On 11/29/2016 8:43 PM, Nick Sarames via Talk wrote:
> Regardless of WE's future, it would be unexpected to receive all the
> services you are used to (from WE)
, as if they felt they had to start competing with jaws. Pam.
-Original Message- From: Jim via Talk
Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2016 4:34 PM
To: Vaughan Dodd ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
Vaughan, I have been using Window-Eyes for years now and I find
I think there was something a few months ago. Pam.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Clark via Talk
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 8:22 PM
To: Vaughan Dodd ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
Here's another thing. When was the last time
>>
>> -Original Message- From: Jim via Talk
>> Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2016 4:34 PM
>> To: Vaughan Dodd ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
>> Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
>>
>> Vaughan, I have been using Window-Eyes for years now and I find with
>&
competing with jaws. Pam.
-Original Message- From: Jim via Talk
Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2016 4:34 PM
To: Vaughan Dodd ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
Vaughan, I have been using Window-Eyes for years now and I find with
each subsequent release
'
Subject: RE: Window-Eyes is Dead!
Hi Jim. I totally agree with you. Let's just focus on the functionality of
Window-Eyes. You are right that all it does is create fear, and uncertainty
when this topic is discussed.
From: Jim [mailto:wohlg...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2016 6:45 PM
Of Mike Rogers via Talk
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 8:13 AM
To: Tom Kingston <tom.kings...@charter.net>; Window-Eyes Discussion List
<talk@lists.window-eyes.com>
Cc: Window-Eyes Discussion List <talk@lists.window-eyes.com>
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
Guess i will
ngs...@charter.net>; Window-Eyes Discussion List
<talk@lists.window-eyes.com>
Cc: Window-Eyes Discussion List <talk@lists.window-eyes.com>
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
Guess i will try to investigate these. Never understood what they were for and
when people talk about the
Tom, thinks for giving a much better definition of User Windows that I.
Sometimes I just Space and figure everyone knows this stuff, which is
stupid, since Pam did ask the question, What are User Windows.
Sheesh! Sometimes I am concerned for myself. Am I ready for the Home
yet?
When
he risk of sounding stupid: what are these user windows you
are talking about? pam.
-Original Message- From: Dave via Talk
Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2016 6:10 PM
To: wohlg...@gmail.com ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
I Miss a big big feature that is no
>
> On 11/28/2016 8:51 PM, Pamela Dominguez via Talk wrote:
> > Okay, at the risk of sounding stupid: what are these user windows you
> > are talking about? pam.
> >
> > -Original Message----- From: Dave via Talk
> > Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2016 6:10 PM
Discussion List
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
I Miss a big big feature that is no longer in the version 9.X of Window
eyes. I use those User Windows, in a couple of Set Files I've created
for a couple of programs I use. Without those User Windows, Window Eyes
9.x does not give me the same
: Monday, November 28, 2016 8:15 PM
To: Pamela Dominguez via Talk
Subject: RE: Window-Eyes is Dead!
How can you jump to the conclusion that window-eyes is dead, when nothing
has been announced yet. I wonder where you are getting this information
from?
Kenny Peyatt jr.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
Okay, at the risk of sounding stupid: what are these user windows you are
talking about? pam.
-Original Message-
From: Dave via Talk
Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2016 6:10 PM
To: wohlg...@gmail.com ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
I Miss a big big
; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
There reason, even when they were GW Micro, was they wanted to make sure the
updates were sound, instead of just releasing them before they were done. I
find they have updates more often, and they are not necessarily as sound
.
-Original Message-
From: Jim via Talk
Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2016 4:34 PM
To: Vaughan Dodd ; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes is Dead!
Vaughan, I have been using Window-Eyes for years now and I find with
each subsequent release the functionality improves considerably
I totally agree! I guess it's like the old saying, if you say something
long enough, people will believe it even if it's not true. Just some
food for thought. Catch Ya Later! de
.
On 27-Nov-16 19:32, Loy via Talk wrote:
This subject line should not be used. No one knows for sure what is
And Zoomtext Fusion has only been around for a year now.
-Original Message-
From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+skyt=shaw...@lists.window-eyes.com] On
Behalf Of Reeva Webb via Talk
Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2016 6:28 PM
To: Tom Kingston; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: Window-Eyes
No, we ain't dead yet but it on life support for sure. Along with zt
fusion, MAGic, optelec's braille displays and fs's terrible low vision
hardware. Not gonna be shocked when 2017 comes and all these things plugs
are pulled.
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 8:05 PM Tom Kingston via Talk <
Dave,
The user windows are still there. The hot keys are all undefined by
default. And be sure to set any window hot keys to program scope. They
all default to global.
Hth,
Tom
On 11/27/2016 6:10 PM, Dave via Talk wrote:
I Miss a big big feature that is no longer in the version 9.X of
This subject line should not be used. No one knows for sure what is to happen
with Window Eyes. It is not dead yet.
___
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
I Miss a big big feature that is no longer in the version 9.X of Window
eyes. I use those User Windows, in a couple of Set Files I've created
for a couple of programs I use. Without those User Windows, Window Eyes
9.x does not give me the same abilities as Window Eyes 8.X This for the
way I use
http://doogle.ssi.govt.nz/resources/publications/reports-research/regional/auckland/auckland-health-disability-resources.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Talk
>> [mailto:talk-bounces+vaughan.dodd001=msd.govt...@lists.window-eyes
Mundell via Talk
Sent: Sunday, 27 November 2016 3:49 p.m.
To: wohlg...@gmail.com; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Window-Eyes is Dead!
Hi Jim. I totally agree with you. Let's just focus on the functionality of
Window-Eyes. You are right that all it does is create fear
-Original Message-
From: Talk
[mailto:talk-bounces+vaughan.dodd001=msd.govt...@lists.window-eyes.com] On
Behalf Of Sky Mundell via Talk
Sent: Sunday, 27 November 2016 3:49 p.m.
To: wohlg...@gmail.com; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Window-Eyes is Dead!
Hi Jim. I totally agree
the functionality of
> Window-Eyes. You are right that all it does is create fear, and uncertainty
> when this topic is discussed.
>
>
>
> From: Jim [mailto:wohlg...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2016 6:45 PM
> To: Sky Mundell; Window-Eyes Discussion List
> Su
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
