[Talk-ca] OSM Canada & State of the Map US: Oct 20-22

Hi, Are any Canadian folks going to State of the Map US October 20-22 https://2017.stateofthemap.us/ During the conference, I would like to have a discussion about turning the informal https://www.osmcanada.ca/ into a not-for-profit Canadian corporation. I'm looking for other folks who thin

Re: [Talk-ca] Stats Canada building project

How do we want to move this discussion forward? Do we need to set up a time to talk on the phone? I am willing to help coordinate logistics. On 2017-09-17 10:55 AM, Stewart C. Russell wrote: On 2017-09-17 10:40 AM, john whelan wrote: They'd like to extend it across Canada so now might be the

Re: [Talk-ca] OSM Canada & State of the Map US: Oct 20-22

d have to change its name though there have been discussions recently about the use of OSM in names. Cheerio John On 27 September 2017 at 21:59, Stewart C. Russell <mailto:scr...@gmail.com>> wrote: On 2017-09-27 05:49 PM, Matthew Darwin wrote: > Hi, > > Are any

Re: [Talk-ca] OSM Canada & State of the Map US: Oct 20-22

Yes. Matthew Darwin matt...@mdarwin.ca http://www.mdarwin.ca On 2017-09-28 12:17 PM, James wrote: And as a local chapter new comers could suggest/view tasks to work on. Kind of like what we did for Fort Mac. A centralized communication hub would enable us to move forward and concentrate our

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Canada 2020 initiative

Another good reason to create an organization that holds the keys to key OSM resources... then it can out-survive all of us. :-) On 2017-09-29 09:41 AM, James wrote: I and others can give access to people to create projects on the tasking manager. I understand that one person might disapear, i

Re: [Talk-ca] Stats Canada building project

Is there anyone on point to drive this activity? On 2017-09-28 06:58 AM, john whelan wrote: Looks like we need to talk nicely to Open-Ouvert. Thanks John On 27 September 2017 at 21:54, Stewart C. Russell > wrote: On 2017-09-27 07:00 PM, john whelan wrote: >

Re: [Talk-ca] Mapping of bilingual destination signs

No, This is about the "desination" sign that you find on major highways, usually they are green. "Exit 114 chemin Anderson Road" or whatever. And this specific issue is about road signs in New Brunswick, and New Brunswick is the only official bilingual province in Cana

Re: [Talk-ca] Mapping of bilingual destination signs

Hi J.P. This sounds reasonable. Do we have a map that shows which areas of the province are French area vs English area. For us non-NBers. Or I suppose one could guess by looking at the existing tags there. (I would assume Fredericton is English area?) If we have a list then could updat

Re: [Talk-ca] COMS2200 Ottawa, Carleton University

Tracey, I just want to say some of the edits are really destructive: eg entire streets are changed/removed (on campus and off campus). My automated error checking script comparing what is in the City of Ottawa street list and what is in OSM caught some errors, which I spent time fixing. Add

Re: [Talk-ca] Mapping of bilingual destination signs

week. Martijn On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 10:16 PM, J.P. Kirby mailto:webmas...@the506.com>> wrote: On 2017-10-03, at 12:33 AM, Matthew Darwin mailto:matt...@mdarwin.ca>> wrote: > Hi J.P. > > This sounds reasonable. Do we h

Re: [Talk-ca] Mapping of bilingual destination signs

Thanks J.P. If at some point there is a more clear boundary maybe someone could update the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/New_Brunswick to give the rest of us more clear guidance. On 2017-10-03 12:16 AM, J.P. Kirby wrote: On 2017-10-03, at 12:33 AM, Matthew Darwin wrote: Hi

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Canada 2020 OSMGeoWeek Mapathons

Hi all, my 2c: If we want to have a bunch of new to OSM people map things, I would suggest that these is a *physical location* with *experts presen**t*.   As we see with the Carleton University example (not uOttawa), it's hard to get new folks on board... i would guess  that although there w

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Canada 2020 OSMGeoWeek Mapathons

Tracey, I look forward to seeing/hearing the reflections and look forward to an improved version of this activity in the future! On 2017-10-19 11:53 AM, Tracey P. Lauriault wrote: We learned quite a bit with the carleton assignment, I hope it does not affect my career as a professor., so far

Re: [Talk-ca] Disconnected addresses

up task. I will keep you updated. In the mean time, if you have any ideas for how to approach this, let me know. Thanks! Martijn On Oct 11, 2017, at 12:05 PM, Martijn van Exel <mailto:m...@rtijn.org>> wrote: Hi all, Matthew Darwin pointed out on Github that some street name updates

Re: [Talk-ca] Ottawa street names

s promenade de la Place-d’Orléans Drive Place-d’Orléans Drive promenade de la Place-d’Orléans Matthew Darwin matt...@mdarwin.ca http://www.mdarwin.ca On 2017-12-04 06:57 AM, James wrote: DES EPINETTES AVE is english. Des Epinettes Avenue. French is avenue Des Epinettes. Don

Re: [Talk-ca] Ottawa street names

éans Drive Place-d’Orléans Drive promenade de la Place-d’Orléans Matthew Darwin matt...@mdarwin.ca http://www.mdarwin.ca On 2017-12-04 06:57 AM, James wrote: DES EPINETTES AVE is english. Des Epinettes Avenue. French is avenue Des Epinettes. Dont look hard for an Explaination why

Re: [Talk-ca] A message aimed more at Ottawa

oo bad we couldn't collaborate better across the country on cycling activities.   Is there a national organization focused on cycling? Matthew Darwin matt...@mdarwin.ca http://www.mdarwin.ca On 2017-12-23 09:30 AM, john whelan wrote: I think the OSM article uses a variety of inputs. https://

Re: [Talk-ca] A message aimed more at Ottawa

cyclable at this time of year. Matthew Darwin matt...@mdarwin.ca http://www.mdarwin.ca On 2018-01-23 03:25 PM, OSM Volunteer stevea wrote: Oops, the bicycle router I wanted to refer to in my previous is http://cycle.travel by Richard Fairhurst (whom I inexplicably confused with Simon Poole

Re: [Talk-ca] A message aimed more at Ottawa

Hi John, After talking to many different folks about what their requirements are for a cycling map, it is clear to me that the cycling routing algorithm requires user-configurable tuning parameters.   People have different requirements at different times: from "find a nice path for a 6 year o

Re: [Talk-ca] building imports (was Re: Talk-ca Digest, Vol 119, Issue 10)

Hi Steve, I'm not who the "movers and shakers" are really.   There is nobody really *driving* this project that I am aware of (the wiki suggests we should have a steering committee).   Every time I see email sent to the original distribution list of people invited to the meeting last Septembe

Re: [Talk-ca] building imports (was Re: Talk-ca Digest, Vol 119, Issue 10)

/project/100 On 2018-01-25 11:13 PM, Matthew Darwin wrote: Hi Steve, I'm not who the "movers and shakers" are really.   There is nobody really *driving* this project that I am aware of (the wiki suggests we should have a steering committee).   Every time I see email sent

Re: [Talk-ca] building imports (was Re: Talk-ca Digest, Vol 119, Issue 10)

2018-01-25 11:39 PM, OSM Volunteer stevea wrote: On Jan 25, 2018, at 8:30 PM, Matthew Darwin wrote: I should mention that there are others in Ottawa working on completing the buildings. The City import only had urban buildings. Since the city of Ottawa is the largest rural city in Canada, so

Re: [Talk-ca] building imports (was Re: Talk-ca Digest, Vol 119, Issue 10)

Hi Steve, I'm all for using the wiki, just want to consider the maintenance effort of keeping the tasking manager in sync with the wiki.  If someone wants to do that, so much the better!   Wikis can get stale quickly without someone(s) to actively look at doing updates, like you're doing. K

Re: [Talk-ca] BC2020 OD_tables wiki and project status

Do-it-Yourself Open Data Toolkit is released here: http://open.canada.ca/en/do-it-yourself-open-data-toolkit Here is the license (Federal): http://open.canada.ca/en/open-government-licence-canada Matthew Darwin matt...@mdarwin.ca http://www.mdarwin.ca On 2018-01-28 03:17 PM, john whelan

Re: [Talk-ca] BC2020 OD_tables wiki and project status

.  CanVec is already approved. :-) Matthew Darwin matt...@mdarwin.ca http://www.mdarwin.ca On 2018-01-28 02:42 PM, Jonathan Brown wrote: Okay, I know the Open Data folks and Open Government folks in Ontario. It’s their job to connect to and support the data stewards within government who are

Re: [Talk-ca] BC2020 OD_tables wiki and project status

Great, seems like we have a list of 3 ok ones: Ottawa (approved license) Gatineau + Montreal (explicit approval provided) @James, do we have documentation as to where approval was given? Would be good to have this info on the wiki. Matthew Darwin matt...@mdarwin.ca http://www.mdarwin.ca

Re: [Talk-ca] Indigenous communities - Building Canada 2020 (BC2020i) - update Dec 20, 2017

Forward from a very long distribution list: Hi J, So you are not aware of any Indigenous communities engaged with OSM anywhere in Canada? It would be great if OSM could be introduced to Indigenous community members so they can help define a direction. Since you have contacts, can you help d

Re: [Talk-ca] BC2020 project

Inline On 2018-01-28 07:38 PM, john whelan wrote: We have lots of people talking about this. Yay! We have a wiki page somewhere that covers some ground.  Could someone remind me of the address? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Canada/Building_Canada_2020 needs lots of impro

[Talk-ca] Preferred phone number format

Hi all, Is there a preferred phone number format we use in Canada? I noticed a bunch of phone numbers in Ottawa don't follow the recommendations in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone, namely: * phone=/number/ where the /number/ should be in international (ITU-T E.164

[Talk-ca] Fwd: Re: Building Canada 2020 (BC2020i) - update Dec 20, 2017

at is accessible and engaging for community partners. Jonathan *From: *Mikel Maron <mailto:mi...@mapbox.com> *Sent: *Friday, January 26, 2018 10:37 AM *To: *Matthew Darwin <mailto:matt...@mdarwin.ca> *Cc: *Talk-CA OpenStreetMap <mailto:talk-ca@openstreetmap.org&

Re: [Talk-ca] Preferred phone number format

Just FYI, I am not doing an automated edit.  One at a time in JOSM. On 2018-01-28 10:23 PM, Stewart C. Russell wrote: On 2018-01-28 08:22 PM, Matthew Darwin wrote: I am wondering if I should have them in the format of "+1 999 555 1234" or "+1-999-555-1234".    If

Re: [Talk-ca] BC2020 project

I think we can politely re-factor out much stuff.  :-)   Now that we seem to have more folks looking into things, I am a bit more motivated to spend time on it. Tech writer type folks would be great to have. Matthew Darwin matt...@mdarwin.ca http://www.mdarwin.ca On 2018-01-28 09:21 PM

Re: [Talk-ca] using image recognition to create building foot prints.

+1 Unless someone has lots of $$$ to throw at OSM work (which could then fund full time coordinators, trainers, lawyers, etc), the only way I see to coordinate is to approach it like how OSM in Canada was build up to now... distributed model with local groups doing what makes sense for their

Re: [Talk-ca] using image recognition to create building foot prints.

pilot and the resources we had available but even there I wasn't certain we would be able to pull it off. Cheerio John 2018-01-29 21:11 GMT-05:00 Matthew Darwin <mailto:matt...@mdarwin.ca>>: +1 Unless someone has lots of $$$ to throw at OSM work (which could then fun

Re: [Talk-ca] using image recognition to create building foot prints.

Ok, just I had to re-write more than just that one section to make it coherent.   Hopefully the page has a bit more logical structure now. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Canada/Building_Canada_2020 Comments and edits welcome! On 2018-01-29 09:26 PM, Matthew Darwin wrote: I

Re: [Talk-ca] Preferred phone number format

se ";" as multiple number separator. * I will use "x" for extension. * And I will be happy to cleanup the wonky ones with lots of text in them if there is a direction of where this should move to.  Example for a radio station: "office (###) ###-; on-air studio

Re: [Talk-ca] Preferred phone number format

Just an update on this activity. * I see people have been quite creative with the tags used for phone numbers, so it is taking me a bit longer to clean up than I originally thought.   Good to find all these weird tags: Phone, alt_phone, phone_1, phone_2, phone:tollfree, phone:toll-free,

Re: [Talk-ca] Preferred phone number format

After editing a few thousand phone numbers in the last week, my preferred format is *contact:phone=+#-###-###-** * My reason is that people are starting to use other tags from the contact:* family so cannot move everything to phone=*, and having both phone=* and contact:phone=* seems unreas

Re: [Talk-ca] Preferred phone number format

From the wiki, I am proposing this format specifically: (phone=+--, following the RFC 3966/NANP pattern) However, convert that to "contact:phone=" instead. The reason I like the one with hypens (vs spaces) is that when you add additional comments in the fi

Re: [Talk-ca] Preferred phone number format

st. On 2018-02-06 01:10 PM, Stewart C. Russell wrote: On 2018-02-05 04:44 PM, Matthew Darwin wrote: I don't know why people use phone=* vs contact:phone=* Because it's the default in most editors, and it's shorter. I'd prefer it over contact:phone, because that's a ne

Re: [Talk-ca] BC2020i - Solving the licensing issues

James, Good point about the quality and attributes of the data will definitely not be consistent between municipalities. As long as the source is identifiable, then the face it is one "file" or many, would be an implementation detail.  IMO. On 2018-02-07 09:46 AM, James wrote: why does it ha

Re: [Talk-ca] BC2020i - Solving the licensing issues

Hi Alessandro, This is great news. Thanks for sharing. Getting a subset of the municipalities' data into a repository with a common license will be be a huge step forward.  Once you have some data in the repository, then the broader OSM community can look at how to import the data into OSM. 

Re: [Talk-ca] BC2020i - Solving the licensing issues

Hi John, I think this approach has merit. Probably it would work if we take a similar approach to what BikeOttawa is doing with OSM data, they wanted a "Level Of Traffic Stress" map.  To that they defined the set of interesting tags, started collecting data, then draw a map.  Now people are l

Re: [Talk-ca] Preferred phone number format

Hi Stewart, I have no problem to make those edits, but would want others to chime in this discussion before I make that sort of change.   OTOH, If others want to make the change, then I stay out of it. On 2018-02-06 01:18 PM, Stewart C. Russell wrote: On 2018-02-05 05:17 PM, Matthew Darwin

Re: [Talk-ca] Preferred phone number format

phone"###- 39 phone"+#-###-###-;+#-###-###- 25 phone"+#-###-###- 23 phone"+#-###-###-####x###      17 phone"+# (###) ###- 14 phone"+#-###-###-x   9 phone"+#-###-###-x# On 2018-02-04 11:49 PM, OSM Volunteer ste

[Talk-ca] Postal Code cleanup

Hi all, Below are the 10 top postal code formats in Canada as seen in *addr:postcode*. When I get bored of tidying up phone numbers, I'll tackle some postal codes. I hope we can all agree that "A#A #A#", which is the most popular, is the correct format that should be used.  The ones that jus

Re: [Talk-ca] Preferred phone number format

###     110 phone"###- 40 phone"+#-###-###-####;+#-###-###- On 2018-02-07 06:46 PM, Matthew Darwin wrote: A further update on this work: * I found more yet bizarre phone-related tags "phone:1", "telephone" and the like.  These have all been tidied.  My osmfilte

[Talk-ca] Formatting of Municipality Names

ton 9666 City of Brantford 9603 Toronto 9487 Shawinigan 9384 City of Sarnia 9380 Red Deer 9102 City of Windsor 9044 City Of Sault Ste. Marie 8466 Sudbury -- Matthew Darwin matt...@mdarwin.ca http://www.mdarwin.ca ___ Talk-ca mail

Re: [Talk-ca] Formatting of Municipality Names

On 2018-02-12 06:05 PM, Stewart Russell wrote: On Feb 12, 2018 17:51, "Matthew Darwin" <mailto:matt...@mdarwin.ca>> wrote: Hi, I am now reviewing the *addr**:city* tag. Seems we are not very consistent how we use it. For example, Toronto:  110707 City

Re: [Talk-ca] Formatting of Municipality Names

Kevin thanks for the history lesson.  As I mentioned on other threads, I'm relatively new here, so I am missing the context, so I appreciate you filling it in. Looking at the 100 used "Town/City/Municipality of " names, they seem to be entirely in Ontario.  So perhaps this is mostly an Ontario

Re: [Talk-ca] Formatting of Municipality Names

Hi Steve, From the top list, I think this is not really a case of different names people use vs official name. Seems like a simpler issue than what you are talking about. which hopefully then is a simpler to solve.  (Not that that issue you are discussing doesn't occur as well, I'm sure). H

Re: [Talk-ca] Postal Code cleanup

are much bigger now... I was querying the postal codes where also there is a contact record) On 2018-02-07 08:01 PM, Matthew Darwin wrote: Hi all, Below are the 10 top postal code formats in Canada as seen in *addr:postcode*. When I get bored of tidying up phone numbers, I'll tack

[Talk-ca] Cleanup of addr:country, addr:province, addr:state

be a more reasonable at this time.  (addr:country is used ~94% less than addr:street) Tags, by number of occurrences:  167902 addr:country   33252 addr:state  179741 addr:province 2950115 addr:city 2942159 addr:street 2934341 addr:housenumber -- Matthew Darwin matt...@mdarwin.ca http

Re: [Talk-ca] Formatting of Municipality Names

To start the cleanup process, the following *Ontario* cities are being changed (remove "City of" or "City Of").   Once that is done, I'll come back with the next batch to process... The idea to remove the city name in its entirety will require careful consideration to ensure the necessary boun

Re: [Talk-ca] Formatting of Municipality Names

In my OSM map updates to remove of "City of" and similar prefixes from locality names, I will not be expanding any "St", "Ste" or any other abbreviations of those names.  If the name (minus the prefix to be removed) matches what is in NRCan database, I will remove the prefix; if it doesn't, I w

Re: [Talk-ca] Formatting of Municipality Names in Ontario

Sandhill)   1 Town of Saugeen Shores (Southampton)   1 Town of Mono (Rosemont)   1 Town of Huntsville (Port Sydney)   1 Town of Clarington (Enniskillen) On 2018-02-16 12:41 PM, Matthew Darwin wrote: To start the cleanup process, the following *Ontario* cities are being changed (rem

Re: [Talk-ca] Formatting of Municipality Names in Ontario

n that basis I'd say yes, Maple is definitely a suburb of Vaughan, as are 1/2 of Thornhill, Concord, Woodbridge, and Kleinburg.  Purpleville and Nashville should likely be classified as neighbourhoods, and Hope and Burrlington (note double "r") as pioneer communities. 16796 Town

Re: [Talk-ca] Formatting of Municipality Names in Ontario

Yes, I plan to do some systematic review of the admin_level tags comparing them to addr:city / addr:suburb.   This way the community can have a data-based discussion on if addr:city etc tags are needed, or the bounaries are good enough or whatever. But first step, we need some analysis. Howev

Re: [Talk-ca] Cleanup of addr:country, addr:province, addr:state

ng with phone numbers, addresses, etc. Kudos! On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 9:40 AM, Matthew Darwin <mailto:matt...@mdarwin.ca>> wrote: Hi all, During the discussion of cleaning up municipality names in Canada, it was suggested that the addr:city could be removed entirely

Re: [Talk-ca] Cleanup of addr:country, addr:province, addr:state

s from the states where I'm familiar with how the US Postal service operates. If this isn't true in Canada - please ignore. Clifford On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 7:21 AM, Matthew Darwin <mailto:matt...@mdarwin.ca>> wrote: I want to bump up this thread to see what other opinions a

Re: [Talk-ca] Cleanup of addr:country, addr:province, addr:state

On 2018-02-19 11:07 AM, john whelan wrote: I seem to recall from talking to Canada Post that Orleans is the only location for which that is true.  All of Orleans is located within Ottawa.  So how do you tag it?  It is within the City of Ottawa these days. Thanks John On 19 February 2018 a

Re: [Talk-ca] Cleanup of addr:country, addr:province, addr:state

ed. On 2018-02-19 11:25 AM, john whelan wrote: So what we are saying is the city field should be filled in not with the physical city but with Canada Posts thoughts of the day? Orleans is different.  It never was a municipality. Cheerio John On 19 February 2018 at 11:17, Matthew Darwin <m

Re: [Talk-ca] Cleanup of addr:country, addr:province, addr:state

Hi Stewart, Thanks for replying. Stewart C. Russell wrote: Alternately my proposal would be to: * change addr:state => addr:province Yes: addr:state is always wrong in Canada, but addr:province might be problematic for territories and First Nations reservations. Yep.  Is there an alter

Re: [Talk-ca] Cleanup of addr:country, addr:province, addr:state

On 2018-02-19 01:49 PM, Stewart C. Russell wrote: Everything beyond the number and street name requires some abstraction, and then a decision needs to be made over which authority one trusts. You're doing great work with your consistency edits, but at some point, completeness/consistency become

Re: [Talk-ca] Formatting of Municipality Names

Steve, I respectively I contend that it is not all abbreviations in OSM needs to be expanded, not withstanding of the general direction to expand abbreviations in OSM.  It is illogical to change the well used name of a location. There is even a wiki page which has been around since 2010 that

Re: [Talk-ca] Formatting of Municipality Names

is maintained as expanded in OSM. If it is not normally expanded, then it is not expanded in OSM. "Saint John" (NB) and "St. John's" (NL) are both correct. Feel free to clarify further on the wiki or continue the discussion here... Matthew Darwin matt...@mdarwin

Re: [Talk-ca] Expanding vs abbreviating

ommon. /Suggestion:/ Name these streets/avenues with the full name (such as 51st Street Northeast) and let the renderer sort out the abbreviation where required. Where the numbering system ends below 30, consider spelling out the numbers. Matthew Darwin matt...@mdarwin.ca http://www.mdarwin.ca On

Re: [Talk-ca] Formatting of Municipality Names in Ontario

I will leave the wonky towns (the ones that have parentheses) for cleanup later.  The other "Town Of" are done. I am working on "Municipality Of" now. On 2018-02-18 11:04 PM, Matthew Darwin wrote: Hi Bill, Thanks for the feedback.  OSM is updated accordingly. I also cha

Re: [Talk-ca] Formatting of Municipality Names in Ontario

of Westport     112 Village Of Hilton Beach and I think that's it for Ontario. On 2018-02-23 11:50 AM, Matthew Darwin wrote: I will leave the wonky towns (the ones that have parentheses) for cleanup later.  The other "Town

Re: [Talk-ca] Risques liés à l'édition à proximité de lignes électriques haute tension (note humoristique)

:-) I think we need a lot more automated QA on OSM data. I started writing some scripts (as you all may have guessed with my previous posts to this list), but the need for more automation is huge as this blog post illustrates.. On 2018-03-06 08:09 AM, Pierre Béland wrote: Voici une note hum

Re: [Talk-ca] Risques liés à l'édition à proximité de lignes électriques haute tension (note humoristique)

tilise probablement des outils automatisés de diagnostic n'a rien vu, n'a pas vu que le segment entre les deux voies du boulevard se superposait a une ligne électrique a autre tension. Un virtuel Ouch cela fait mal, 735,000 Volts ! Pierre Le mardi 6 mars 2018 11:52:51 HNE, Matthe

Re: [Talk-ca] Emergency Request for Tasking Manager Trainer

Hi Jonathan, Are you trying to set up the tasking manager, or you just want to add a project to the existing tasking manager http://tasks.osmcanada.ca/?  If you describe the details of what you're trying to accomplish (look at existing tasks), then someone can probably add a task for you. Or

Re: [Talk-ca] Emergency Request for Tasking Manager Trainer

vent into the workflows of the educational and local planning structures and processes at the municipal and regional level. Alessandro and his colleagues at the TB Open Data branch are well aware of what we are trying to do. Jonathan *From: *Matthew Darwin <mailto:matt...@mdarwin.ca> *S

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Footprint Upload to OSM

Rob, One other thing to think about while others are discussing the licensing topic:  What is the quality of the buildings?  Has that been reviewed? * Are they in the right place? * Are they the right size? * Are they squared off (rectangles) * Are they aligned to each other and the road

Re: [Talk-ca] Cleanup of addr:country, addr:province, addr:state

So I've tidied up the addr:province/state tags, now using only addr:province, leaving anything that would be generally considered "correct" either spelt out in full or using English provincial abbreviation as you might use in a mailing address. Also left "Quebec" (no accent). I would rather l

[Talk-ca] Poorly drawn buildings #GEOG231-W18; #BC2020; #UCalgary-GEOG231; #BC2020-UCalgary

Hi all, I noticed some poorly drawn (not-square) buildings in Calgary tagged with the hashags #GEOG231-W18;#BC2020;#UCalgary-GEOG231;#BC2020-UCalgary.  If you are involved in this project, you might want to review the quality. I added a "fixme" tag to the problems I happen to notice. __

Re: [Talk-ca] Cleanup of addr:country, addr:province, addr:state

Searching on "110 Laurier Avenue West, on" in Nominatim already works (it finds Ottawa City hall) even though the address has no addr:province tag for City Halle.  So I don't think this is a good reason to be adding addr:province/addr:province:short_name tags. IMO.  Unless there is another use

Re: [Talk-ca] Cleanup of addr:country, addr:province, addr:state

Pierre, This is a good idea, and I plan to do it.   My current challenge is to know what things people think "need correction".  I'm starting these discussions to see if there is any consensus before I go writing code.  If you (or anyone else) has ideas, please do post here (or email directly

Re: [Talk-ca] Poorly drawn buildings #GEOG231-W18; #BC2020; #UCalgary-GEOG231; #BC2020-UCalgary

10:42, Matthew Darwin <mailto:matt...@mdarwin.ca>> wrote: Hi all, I noticed some poorly drawn (not-square) buildings in Calgary tagged with the hashags #GEOG231-W18;#BC2020;#UCalgary-GEOG231;#BC2020-UCalgary. If you are involved in this project, you might want to review t

Re: [Talk-ca] Trans-Canada Highway research

On 2018-03-26 07:20 AM, Olivia Robu - (p) wrote: Hello, The Telenav Map team has done some research on the status of the ways and relations of Trans-Canada Highway. Here are some conclusions from this research: * The highway is formed from 30 routes; The Trans-Canada highway is not rea

Re: [Talk-ca] Trans-Canada Highway research

H), so the naming is consistent only within a province.  Please review https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Canada_Highway On 2018-03-26 09:25 AM, Matthew Darwin wrote: * Another question is related to the priority of the names in the name value tag and also for the ref tag. If we have a way t

[Talk-ca] Fwd: Re: Building Canada 2020 (BC2020i) - update Dec 20, 2017

Forwarded message... Subject:Re: Building Canada 2020 (BC2020i) - update Dec 20, 2017 Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 13:21:22 -0500 From: keith hartley Hi building 20/20 list Last Friday I worked with one of my colleagues and a high school teacher to map out some thin

Re: [Talk-ca] Trans-Canada Highway research

Hi Olivia, I spent some fixing tags on TCH ways in *Ontario* in the last few weeks.  Do an overpass query on nat_name=Trans-Canada Highway in Ontario (see below). Is it possible to build a query that shows ways with nat_name=Trans-Canada Highway and not part of the relation, and vice-versa.

[Talk-ca] Fwd: BC2020i - update Sept 2018

Forwarded Message Subject:BC2020i - update Sept 2018 Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 13:54:41 + From: Alasia, Alessandro (STATCAN) To: many Dear all, I hope you had a good and relaxing summer. I imagine this email will find you all back in the office or at you

Re: [Talk-ca] Stats Canada new building outlines Open Data do we wish to import it?

I think we should identify who would like to be involved in import for each municipality.  (on a wiki page). On the page, identify roles, like: * coordinator * import data preparation * QA * import execution * data enrichment (commercial, residential, etc... tagging) * etc.. Then we

Re: [Talk-ca] Stats Canada new building outlines Open Data do we wish to import it?

Of course. Could use the ottawa import approach:  "leave existing buildings alone". Matthew Darwin matt...@mdarwin.ca http://www.mdarwin.ca On 2018-11-02 7:03 p.m., OSM Volunteer stevea wrote: On Nov 2, 2018, at 3:58 PM, John Whelan wrote: So to paraphrase your reply. A centrali

Re: [Talk-ca] canvec imports

Andrew, Keep up the great work making OSM great for Canada. On 2018-11-27 1:36 p.m., Andrew Lester wrote: I agree. A selective import from CANVEC is fine and generally gives good results. As long as you don't import things like forests and buildings (which are both woefully out-of-date, broke

[Talk-ca] Business Improvement Area tagging

Hello all, I'm not sure if this applies to other provinces or not, so I thought I would ask here. In Ontario there is a concept of "Business Improvement Area" ("BIA" for short) that has the power to tax businesses within their zone  (see http://www.mah.gov.on.ca/Page1529.aspx for details).

Re: [Talk-ca] Business Improvement Area tagging

undaries. For your analysis of businesses within a BIA, you can just download the OSM and BIA boundary data separately and do the analysis in the GIS application of your choice.  Harald. On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:32 PM Matthew Darwin <mailto:matt...@mdarwin.ca>> wrote: Hello all

[Talk-ca] Phone number quality checks

Hello all, OSMOSE now has validations for phone numbers in Canada. http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?country=canada_%2A&limit=2500&item=3092 ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Re: [Talk-ca] Saints in street names in Ontario

In Ottawa, there were (and still are) cases where the signs do not match the "official" name in the City of Ottawa database.  Local mappers will consider the signs as authoritative according to OSM rules (what you see on the ground wins). When I come across this situation I contact the City of

[Talk-ca] Inconsistencies in names for admin_level=5 boundaries in Québec

Hello, I was looking at the admin_level=5 boundaries in Québec, and I notice they appear to not be named consistently (list below). Possible issues: * m-dash vs n-dash to separate names (compare Gaspésie–Îles-de-la-Madeleine vs Abitibi-Témiscamingue) * spaces between names (compare Abitib

Re: [Talk-ca] Inconsistencies in names for admin_level=5 boundaries in Québec

espaces Pierre Le lundi 2 septembre 2019 11 h 24 min 08 s UTC−4, Matthew Darwin a écrit : Hello, I was looking at the admin_level=5 boundaries in Québec, and I notice they appear to not be named consistently (list below).  Possible issues: * m-dash vs n-dash to separate names (compare

[Talk-ca] OSMOSE change: split on admin_level=5 boundaries in Québec

Hello, Just a note to advise that OSMOSE QA tool now has smaller areas to process in Québec rather than one area for the entire province. The tool is now using the admin_level=5 boundaries.  This follows the same change done for Ontario earlier this year. The reason to split up a province int

Re: [Talk-ca] Saints in street names in Ontario

on > http://osmstats.neis-one.org/?item=countries&country=Canada > (they aren't necessarily representative of the community, but it's > really the closest we can reasonably do given our current tooling) [3] > (no private messa

Re: [Talk-ca] Importing buildings in Canada

Hello all, Happy to see progress here. My ongoing question is how to define that a "local" group has determined that an import can proceed.   And more specifically what is "local"? There are rural and remote parts of Canada which have in the order of zero active mappers or sense of a local co