+1
2010/6/7 Luc Van den Troost luc.a...@gmail.com
As it starts to be an early voting here, +1 for me too, at least for the
areas with low areal resolution.
For the areas with high res areal images we probably have to look first
what areas have a good landuse definitions right now. Based on
Hi
I'm giving a workshop on Friday at the Africa Agricultural GIS Week in Nairobi.
The first half of the day will be a short mapping party. The second half of the
day will survey topics in how to use OSM data ... in OpenLayers, Shapefiles,
using osmosis, API, etc. The audience will be GIS
Hi, I have a presentation on the same topic due for the 20th, maybe we could
work together.
what about a shared google doc for a presentation?
http://docs.google.com/present/edit?id=0AYQovvVR7xyxZGc2NnAzc3dfMTk3Z3doMmJkYzkhl=en
here i started something very simple.
mike
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at
Hi Mikel,
This page [1] deals with the use of the XAPI with OpenLayers. It's
very interesting, but in French.
The app [2] source might be more readable/
HTH,
F.
[1] http://www.geotribu.net/node/260
[2] http://88.191.39.115/fabien/geotribu/application/osm/xapi/
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 8:14 AM,
John Smith schrieb:
Currently I've been making a proposal for OSM to adopt an UUID tagging
scheme so that third parties wishing to directly refer to OSM objects
can do so without the current problems of using internal database
reference IDs vanishing in future.
I don't think that your
On 7 June 2010 17:58, Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de wrote:
I don't think that your uuid-tags will be more stable either - they are
subject to thousands of editors that will sometimes delete tags they don't
know or that won't take over those tags to the ways when they create polys
for
On 7 June 2010 18:26, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
I like Tim's Query-to-map [1] which accomplishes this task already and
doesn't rely on any extra tagging, by combining bbox+[ref|name] -- tags that
don't vanish as fast as some mysterious uuid tag.
There is a lot of ID tags in
Hi,
John Smith wrote:
Also it doesn't cover a new thought I had on the subject, being able
to assign unique IDs in the field without needing to connect to the
main OSM DB to get a new ID, this might be useful in emergency
situations where you need to tag a lot of things in tandem with a
John,
John Smith wrote:
I think you have misunderstood or at least not comprehended the
potential for being able to easily share the same ID with other
databases without needing to do special or complex bbox searches like
you suggest.
It doesn't exactly require a stroke of genius to see
On 7 June 2010 19:01, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
It doesn't exactly require a stroke of genius to see that potential, given
that people are already using our internal IDs all over the place for lack
of something better.
I'm open to suggestion on what would be better, I don't
On 7 June 2010 18:51, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Sounds like a rather hypothetical situation to me but if I ever found myself
in such a situation I would simply assign a block of negative IDs to every
participant and have them use these. Just like in an .osc document really.
That
On 7 June 2010 19:08, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 June 2010 18:51, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Sounds like a rather hypothetical situation to me but if I ever found myself
in such a situation I would simply assign a block of negative IDs to every
participant
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
For every kind of object and every context in which you link to it, the
change of some properties might invalidate the link. That's why UUIDs
are not only clumsy but also not solving the problem.
But location/tag combinations could:
John Smith schrieb:
I think you have misunderstood or at least not comprehended the
potential for being able to easily share ...
I think I did.
But as you already said, you're not the first one with this idea and
just adding another id-tag doesn't make anything better. So please,
let's first
Hi,
John Smith wrote:
You misunderstood, I wasn't talking about people tagging stuff moving
across town, I was talking about the thing they tagged moving across
town.
Yes. And thereby a link might, or might not, lose its meaning.
Also the current proposal suggests using multiple UUID tags
On 7 June 2010 19:19, Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de wrote:
But as you already said, you're not the first one with this idea and just
adding another id-tag doesn't make anything better. So please, let's first
check if this is *really* a good solution instead of just playing the
On 7 June 2010 19:13, Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de wrote:
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
For every kind of object and every context in which you link to it, the
change of some properties might invalidate the link. That's why UUIDs are
not only clumsy but also not solving the problem.
But
On 7 June 2010 19:22, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
This could lead to an inflation of UUIDs on the object, and everyone who
changes the object will have to decide which of them to keep, which to move,
which to delete. For example, a restaurant would have one UUID for the
building
On 07/06/2010 10:22, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Then if you, as a mapper, find that the restaurant has
moved across town you'll have to find out what to do with these UUIDs
(or, more likely, you'll just leave them alone).
Isn't that going to be true whatever mechanism is used?
If the OSM object
John Smith wrote:
On 7 June 2010 19:19, Peter Körnerosm-li...@mazdermind.de wrote:
But as you already said, you're not the first one with this idea and just
adding another id-tag doesn't make anything better. So please, let's first
check if this is *really* a good solution instead of just
On 7 June 2010 19:45, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Internally generated id numbers are used to currently identify things. As long
as those numbers do not change then they can be used to provide permanent
links
to anything in the database. The problem - I think - is that these
El 07/06/2010 8:14, Mikel Maron escribió:
The second half of the day will survey topics in how to use OSM data
... in OpenLayers, Shapefiles, using osmosis, API, etc. The audience
will be GIS professionals.
Does anyone have any presentation files or materials that covers this
kind of thing?
2010/6/7 Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de:
John Smith schrieb:
Currently I've been making a proposal for OSM to adopt an UUID tagging
scheme so that third parties wishing to directly refer to OSM objects
can do so without the current problems of using internal database
reference
John Smith wrote:
XML is supposed to make data interchange between different databases
easier, but once you start mixing datasets all bets are off, this has
nothing to do with XML and everything to do with mixing datasets.
As for your other point about UUIDs being useful, I think I agree with
On 7 June 2010 20:05, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
UUID is an already well structured unique id so there is no point trying to
redesign it ... lets just use it ...
I haven't seen anyone argue against UUIDs specifically, just some
people have approached the problem of trying to use
On 06/06/10 17:46, Gary68 wrote:
could you please be a little bit more precise what you don't like at
osmarender and especially mapgen.pl?
It was me who said that, actually. Here are a few comments, mostly in
relation to the Mapnik style:
2010/6/6 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Off the top of my head I'm thinking of a line within the area that
defines the direction. it would have to be linked to the boundary by
using relations(?)
Yup that is how I
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.dewrote:
I don't think that your uuid-tags will be more stable either - they are
subject to thousands of editors that will sometimes delete tags they
don't know or that won't take over those tags to the ways when they
create
On 7 June 2010 23:12, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
What about the website=* tag? Do people tend to maintain them? Because
website=u.osm.org/c9f0f516-7da2-4cf0-a455-b09f90792c7d would work equally
well and wouldn't require any new tags.
While you can embed a UUID in a URL I would suggest it
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 9:18 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
On 7 June 2010 23:12, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
The only thing I'm really afraid of is that these tags would violate what
some people seem to believe is a rule - the supposed map only what's on
the
ground rule.
hi,
thanks for the information. i thought that some issues were related to
the style file but of course some are technology inherent - and might
need heavy thinking and development before being solved. at least
speaking for mapgen.pl
regarding mapgen:
- the icon issues could be solved quickly by
Gerv,
Gervase Markham wrote:
I'd like to render a map of about a square mile or so of the town of
Bromley, in Kent, for the information sheet for my wedding in August (yay!).
I guess by now you have an idea of the kind of trouble you're signing up
to by getting married ;-)
If you
* are
2010/6/7 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
Interesting problem. Seems related to the general how to map a street
as an area without sacrificing the properties of streets problem. Use
an area, and a relation, with the relation specifying which way(s) are
the top and bottom?
+1, as long as
Hi, I've got a question about the current CC license: Let's say one would like
to create a tourist map from OSM data - eg like those AZ city plans
(http://www.a-zmaps.co.uk/?nid=354)
Am I right that such a tourist map could only be published under a CC-like
license again? In other words, if I
2010/6/7 Gary68 g...@gary68.de:
regarding mapgen:
- the icon issues could be solved quickly by the user (by drawing or
using new ones)
FWIW, these icons here are awesome: http://www.sjjb.co.uk/mapicons/
(they are the successor/evolution of the svg-twotone ones that OSM's
Mapnik style uses,
Frederik Ramm schrieb am 07.06.2010 19:36:
So if that interpretation of CC-BY-SA is correct, practically no one would
be
able to do really creative things with OSM if she or he would like to get a
ROI
on that work?
Our standard reply is that you cannot expect to apply old-world
On 7 June 2010 23:39, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Well, I'm sure even the most ardent map only what's on the ground
proponents will make exceptions for things which are legally required. As
If attribution is legally required the attribution tag should be used,
not the source tag, the source
On 8 June 2010 10:16, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd prefer that. But if the let's try to get consensus for a new tag
process fails, there's always shove it into an already accepted tag
option. (At which point it'd probably be website:uuid=*, or even
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 8:16 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
On 7 June 2010 23:39, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Either way, I could see someone going around removing uuid=* tags from
places where they couldn't find the QR code in the store window.
UUIDs aren't just so you
On 8 June 2010 11:04, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Just to clarify, I don't mean to imply that they'd be right, just that I
could see it happening.
I'm still trying to find someone that has self printed suitable
stickers to find out how to do it at a reasonable cost, while it might
be cheap
On 6 June 2010 12:21, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
highway=steps area=yes?
A very good question posed by Alex. I have a few wide steps (~50m) in my
city.
It's a good start for a solution from Nathan, but it would need a
direction tag in order for the renderers to know which way
If you want to interlink databases, eg wikipedia, you would simply
extend upon the work I've done for UUID to OSM object lookup table,
you'd add one more table and then use the UUID as the key field and
link other object IDs from other databases to it.
Do you have a link? I'm not
On 8 June 2010 12:09, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
I'm not sure. The description would be fairly freeform. I can't think of
anything else that would be as freeform as that.
I call it a wiki but I imagine most of the data would be structured. In
fact, in many ways I think it'd be better
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:18 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
You might be confusing a couple of issues here, when you look at OSM
tags you are viewing a simplified database, that is the raw data, what
you are describing is presentation of that data in a more human
friendly way,
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Really, I think we need a better example than a lamp post, or at least the
node ID of an actual lamp post in OSM.
http://osmdoc.com/en/tag/highway/street_lamp
Still not sure what the use case would be, though :).
On 8 June 2010 12:50, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Really, I think we need a better example than a lamp post, or at least the
node ID of an actual lamp post in OSM.
http://osmdoc.com/en/tag/highway/street_lamp
Still not sure
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:51 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
On 8 June 2010 12:50, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Really, I think we need a better example than a lamp post, or at least
the
node ID of an actual
On 8 June 2010 12:46, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
I'm not the one who brought up free form text, you are.
This is why this is a proposal and why we are discussing things to
brain storm...
Otherwise, we have no basis to maintain the link, and they might as well
just link to the node.
That's
On 8 June 2010 12:55, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Fair enough. So the description is optional.
If someone needed to add a description can't they just use the note=*
tag? Which then makes it a display issue.
One purpose of unique IDs is to inter-link databases, while it's nice
to know which
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:55 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
On 8 June 2010 12:46, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
How else are you going to describe what your object is? I don't see a
uuid:lamp_post in your list of examples. I guess that would be,
uuid:man_made? I don't
By the way, I assume we should break this out to an off-list discussion, or
on a different list, or something.
My apologies to those who don't like a lot of traffic on talk.
OSM-verbose, anyone?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On 8 June 2010 13:04, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
I just think it'd be a lot easier to say uuid=*, uuid_type=lamp post.
Because uuid:highway=* is incredibly non-intuitive. Of course, that doesn't
work because then you can't have multiple uuids on a single object without
creating relations
On 8 June 2010 13:09, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
By the way, I assume we should break this out to an off-list discussion, or
on a different list, or something.
My apologies to those who don't like a lot of traffic on talk.
OSM-verbose, anyone?
I attempted to start a thread on the
2010/6/6 Filippo Dal Bosco - filippo.dalbo...@libero.it:
[cut]
se l' escursionismo dura più giorni con notti passate in tenda?
[cut]
Eh, basta cambiare le batterie, che saranno spero delle normalissime
batterie stilo :-)
--
E' assurdo impiegare gli uomini di intelligenza eccellente per fare
Avendo l'occasione prossimamente di trascorrere qualche giorno in quel
di Finale Ligure/Borgio ho notato che molte tracce rilevate portano con
se il tag fixme.
Intuisco si tratti di qualcosa da correggere nel rilevamento, ma mi
chiedo: in particolare cosa manca o è sbagliato?
Sapendo cosa cercare
Ultima cosa magari poi l'approfondiamo, come si stampa un file di oltre 1
metro per quasi 4? c'è un modo per avere una cartina più portabile? ;) se
passo da 72 a 300dpi non ricampionando si leggeranno i nomi delle vie e i
dettagli piccoli?
se voui stampare il file, devi passare a 300dpi,
Sembra che adesso vada. Sarà stato un down temporaneo.
Ciao,
Simone
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
2010/6/4 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
metto il PCN in massima risoluzione e comincio...
I tuoi consigli sono ottimi, ma mi chiedo se non convenga aspettare la
disponibilità di ulteriori fonti dati (es. Corine Land Cover 2006 come
hanno fatto i francesi) per evitarsi la noia del
Il 07/06/2010 9.03, ale_z...@libero.it ha scritto:
Ciao
molte sono residential col tag name=fixme, significa perciò che manca il nome
della via.
La zona è battuta parecchio da utenti di passaggio che magari percorrono le
vie in auto e non possono/vogliono segnare anche i nomi delle vie.
I tuoi consigli sono ottimi, ma mi chiedo se non convenga aspettare la
disponibilità di ulteriori fonti dati (es. Corine Land Cover 2006 come
hanno fatto i francesi) per evitarsi la noia del ricalco.
Qualche commento dai più esperti sull'affidabilità / precisione dei due
metodi?
Se non
Il link per scaricarvi le slides della mia presentazione sulla mappatura del
TPL a Padova:
https://docs.google.com/present/edit?id=0AX90JH2rM34XZGR6cGJoczlfODU3anM2emgzcAhl=it
Ciao
Tiziano
2010/6/6 ale_z...@libero.it ale_z...@libero.it
Dovrebbero essere disponibili tutte le slide dei diversi
2010/6/7 Stefano Salvador stefano.salva...@gmail.com:
I tuoi consigli sono ottimi, ma mi chiedo se non convenga aspettare la
disponibilità di ulteriori fonti dati (es. Corine Land Cover 2006 come
hanno fatto i francesi) per evitarsi la noia del ricalco.
Qualche commento dai più esperti
Il 07 giugno 2010 05.45, Edoardo 'Yossef' Marascalchi
edoa...@edoardomarascalchi.it ha scritto:
Non mi ricordo se qualcuno ne aveva già parlato, cmq, ieri sono capitato
per caso qui:
http://www.zainoinspalla.it/index.asp
conoscete, è già stato contattato?
non lo conoscevo e non mi sembra
Il 06/06/2010 21.09, Matteo ha scritto:
Poi avvia Virtualbox e vai nel menu File / Importa
applicazione virtuale
Segui il menu guidato, ad un certo punto ti verra' chiesto
di selezionare l'immagine dell'hard disk della macchina
virtuale. E' il file che hai decompresso prima.
Non mi fa
Riprendiamo a parlarne?
Secondo il sondaggio http://doodle.com/vksgfrpxee6ywib3? la data prescelta
sarebbe il 17 -18 luglio, personalmente aggiungo anche venerdì 16
Oggi con Luca si parlava di quali cartine acquistare, pensavamo a queste http:
//www.escursionista.it/quadrocartegenerale.html
On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 03:14:26PM +0200, Stefano Salvador wrote:
c'è qualcuno che può fare un riassunto di com'è andata ad osmit2010 ?
Ecco qua le mie personalissime impressioni!
Anzitutto una considerazione sulla nostra mappa: Genova è una
delle città più complesse per un navigatore
Ciao a tutti,
stavo giocando con Mapsource (il programma per le mappe dei
dispositivi Garmin) ed ho avuto diversi grattacapi perché
utilizzandolo con le mappe in formato img esportate da GFOSS mi
crashava miseramente.
A dire il vero il software non è un granché, però mi sembrava comunque
strano
Ciao a tutti,
oggi usavo Streetview di Google e mi sono posto una domanda.
Streetview usa dati (foto) raccolte mandando le famose Google cars in
giro per le città; ovviamente, tutte queste foto avranno un qualche
tipo di licenza d'uso non libera, e fin qua tutto ok.
Immaginiamo ora che io voglia
Che ne pensate?
Mi sono posto le stesse domande più volte anch'io. Non solo un legale
ma credo di aver capito che la risposta stia nella tutela sui generis
dei database: tu non puoi creare un database (OSM) derivato da un
altro database (StreetView di Google). Quindi non puoi leggere i nomi
Grazie per il resoconto.
Andrebbe fatto un sondaggio tra gli osmers: come mai la passione
OSM non va oltre la mappa e la mailing list?
Non posso parlare per gli altri comunque io ci sarei venuto
volentieri, solo che rubare 3 giorni al lavoro/famiglia non è sempre
facile ...
È un modello che
On 6/7/10, Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com wrote:
oggi usavo Streetview di Google [...]
posso usare l'evidenza fattuale che ricavo dalla foto non libera), [...]
secondo me oltre alla licenza della foto si dovrebbe anche leggere i
termini d'uso del sito da cui e` stata tratta
--
Elena
2010/6/7 Stefano Salvador stefano.salva...@gmail.com:
Mi sono posto le stesse domande più volte anch'io. Non solo un legale
ma credo di aver capito che la risposta stia nella tutela sui generis
dei database: tu non puoi creare un database (OSM) derivato da un
altro database (StreetView di
Mi pareva che ne avessimo parlato alcuni mesi fa dell'argomento Streetview.
Io solitamente interpreto le licenze nella maniera più stringente possibile,
nel caso delle foto però, sono daccordo con te per alcuni motivi:
- mi pare che sia assodato che G non dica che nessuna informazione sia
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 05:10:23PM +0200, Stefano Salvador wrote:
ma forse i mappatori stanno perdendo
l'occasione di trasformare il loro passatempo preferito in
qualcosa di più importante?
Non sarei così pessimista, perché OSM è già adesso qualcosa di
importante
Ho scritto male la
2010/6/7 ale_z...@libero.it ale_z...@libero.it:
che compongono il tragitto di una strada noi prenderemmo una piccolissima
porzione di una delle molte foto della strada; percentualmente sarebbe una
Io sarei ancora più ottimista: secondo me non prendiamo neanche una
porzione della foto, ma un
2010/6/7 ale_z...@libero.it ale_z...@libero.it:
- mi pare che sia assodato che G non dica che nessuna informazione sia
copiabile da loro, ma piuttosto che ... parti rilevanti, o ... con metodo
sistematico non possano essere copiate;
si, se prendo il nome di una strada, non è una parte
Il giorno Sun, 6 Jun 2010 21:24:28 +0200 (CEST)
ale_z...@libero.it ale_z...@libero.it ha scritto:
d'avere abbastanza autonomia). Per acquistare un GPS pensa piuttosto
se lo vuoi cartografico, molto robusto, molto sensibile, economico o
costoso ... questi sono i parametri più importanti :-)
2010/6/7 Luca Delucchi lucadel...@gmail.com:
per me vanno bene tutte a parte che ci sia tanto da mappare...chi
conosce meglio la zona parli
Conosco un po' la Valsavaranche.
La prima cosa che dobbiamo decidere è se fare un mapping party
internazionale (cercando di incontrare i cugini francesi)
2010/6/7 Federico Cozzi f.co...@gmail.com:
Nel nostro caso invece non c'è nessun diritto d'autore sulla targa
stradale. Ci potrebbe essere sulla streetview (discutibile: è stata
presa meccanicamente, forse solo con il diritto UK sarebbe coperta da
diritto d'autore) da cui comunque noi non
Il 07 giugno 2010 17.36, Federico Cozzi f.co...@gmail.com ha scritto:
2010/6/7 ale_z...@libero.it ale_z...@libero.it:
che compongono il tragitto di una strada noi prenderemmo una piccolissima
porzione di una delle molte foto della strada; percentualmente sarebbe una
Io sarei ancora più
2010/6/7 Stefano Salvador stefano.salva...@gmail.com:
Grazie per il resoconto.
Andrebbe fatto un sondaggio tra gli osmers: come mai la passione
OSM non va oltre la mappa e la mailing list?
Non posso parlare per gli altri comunque io ci sarei venuto
volentieri, solo che rubare 3 giorni al
Messaggio originale
Da: f.co...@gmail.com
Data: 07/06/2010 17.45
A: openstreetmap list - italianotalk-it@openstreetmap.org
Ogg: Re: [Talk-it] Graian Alps Mapping party
Conosco un po' la Valsavaranche.
La prima cosa che dobbiamo decidere è se fare un mapping party
internazionale (cercando
Messaggio originale
Da: dieterdre...@gmail.com
Data: 07/06/2010 18.54
A: openstreetmap list - italianotalk-it@openstreetmap.org
Ogg: Re: [Talk-it] Impressioni da OSMit2010
sarei venuto anch'io ma non ero in Italia in quei giorni. Ci vediamo a
SOTM oppure l'anno prossimo...
ciao,
Martin
(cut)
Intendevo dire: ma gli Osmers non si rendono conto che stanno
creando un oggetto ben più importante della somma dei singoli
contributi? Possibile che non siano interessati agli sviluppi di
questo progetto?
Tradotto in parole provere: nessuno che voglia trasformare il
proprio
2010/6/7 Filippo Dal Bosco - filippo.dalbo...@libero.it:
MapSource è il dvd , suppongo, non le mappe su scheda SD.
MapSource è un programma gratuito che in teoria è disponibile solo
con mappe Garmin (a pagamento).
In pratica è possibile scaricarlo dal sito Garmin e usarlo anche per
mappe non
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 09:50:01PM +0200, Mattia Cacco wrote:
Io credo che attualmente ci sia più di qualcuno che possa essere
interessato a trasformare il proprio passatempo in una professione, io
compreso, ma (almeno dal mio punto di vista) vedo troppe difficoltà e poca
chiarezza normativa.
niubii ha scritto:
[...]
- ti annoti il nome delle due directory in cui risiedono
questi files
- copi/sovrascrivi nelle stesse directory i due files che
hai estratto dall'archivio compresso
ho provato con il compia incolla ma non funziona, mi segnala un errore
VirtualBox ho provato anche
Il 07/06/2010 17.53, Filippo Dal Bosco - ha scritto:
Sopratutto, se cartografico, mi intereserebbe uno che si lasci caricare
con foto e/o mappe da me disegnate acquisite con scanner o con mappe
da me disegnate tramite PC.
Al momento che io sappia solo i nuovi firmware del colorado,
Non ho mai partecipato ad un mapping party in montagna e non so se
convenga dividerci (un sentiero a testa, ci si ritrova la sera) oppure
fare tutti insieme (molto più simpatico, si mappa di meno). Nel primo
caso ci conviene rimanere in una zona, nel secondo caso possiamo
tentare percorsi più
Infine un grazie a tutta l'organizzazione, Luca Delucchi si è
fatto in quattro per la riuscita dell'evento ed ha trascinato
tutto il Comitato Organizzatore. Secondo me le persone hanno
dimostrato di essere di gran lunga superiori alle istituzioni per
le quali lavorano: valga per tutti il
Hallo!
Kann vielleicht ein Ortsansässiger den genauen Verlauf +
Anschlussstellen/Tunnels der S35 einzeichnen? Da dürfte sich auf der Strecke
Bruck-Mixnitz seit der Eröffnung des Lückenschlusses einiges geändert.
Ich habe es bereits grob eingezeichnet.
Mfg My Friend
--
Sicherer, schneller und
Servus,
der letzte Innsbrucker Stammtisch wurde im April gemeinsam mit der Linux
User Group Tirol (LUGT) veranstaltet. Im Rahmen von zwei kleineren
Präsentationen wurde das neue Ubuntu sowie das Projekt OpenStreetMap
vorgestellt. Anschließend entwickelten sich interessante Diskussionen.
Die Idee
maning sambale wrote, On Monday, 07 June, 2010 01:39 PM:
I have been reviewing estimated time of arrival (ETA) for garmin gps
routing. I noticed that as Sehested reported, the speed calculation
is over-optimistic. Due to the absence of complete maxspeed data in
PH streets,
I think the
Wrong suggestion
more apt..
Rules don't apply
The speeds should be set to the real speed limits by law not a vague Traffic
flow
limitation imposed by Traffic (Jam) Enforcers...
If I do 30KM/H will my garmin later report speeding?
5KM per hour is walking speed, I do faster than that most
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Michael Cole colemic...@gmail.com wrote:
(I walk everywhere in Makati..)
And my cycling speed is faster than most primary/secondary roads in Marikina :)
I agree that most of this speed limits isn't followed, but the default
road_speed (in the osm-ph map) is very
Alex,
Alexrk wrote:
Am I right that such a tourist map could only be published under a CC-like
license again? In other words, if I do so and sell just one copy of that map,
any Big Publishing Co could duplicate and sell the same on its own for
..hmm.. half the price?
Correct.
So if
On 7 June 2010 21:40, Alexrk alex...@yahoo.de wrote:
Frederik Ramm schrieb am 07.06.2010 19:36:
So if that interpretation of CC-BY-SA is correct, practically no one would
be
able to do really creative things with OSM if she or he would like to get a
ROI
on that work?
Our standard reply
Alex,
Alexrk wrote:
You might like AZ (or Falk or whatever) or not - but please don't
underestimate
the creative work of cartographers. Making a good readable, fine-looking
paper
map is far more than installing Mapnik, choosing some color styles and
pressing
the render-button.
I
Frederik Ramm schrieb am 07.06.2010 22:55:
Incidentally that it also the reason why I am against share-alike
licenses - because they are rooted in IP, in the idea that our work of
recording stuff around us somehow entitles us to dictate our terms and
conditions to others. Just like you
Alex,
Alexrk wrote:
Lets assume someone works two weeks - hunch darkly night after night over
Adobe
Illustrator, coming up with a handmade city map of Hamburg. OK voila nice,
now
lets try to sell it in a small edition of printed copies (BoD or whatsoever).
But why should one invest two
1 - 100 di 290 matches
Mail list logo
