Hi all,
Whenever one gets mail that is not properly formatted and therefore has
lines which exceed the width of the message view window, is there no
method to wrap the text and if not, wouldn't this be a desirable
feature to have?
--
-=Allie=-
Error reading FAT Table.
Hi all,
I remember some time ago I'd brought up the fact that the 'paste as
quote' prefixing was inappropriately fixed to a '' especially since
many of us use the senders initials as parts of our quote prefixes.
I was just perusing my newsreader, Forte Agent, which I know has a
'paste as
Hi all,
I had suggested earlier that using the alt+arrow buttons for scrolling
through a message was too cumbersome and it would be a lot nicer if one
needed to use only the arrow buttons, pretty much as you would do with
your browser or any html formatted message that you may have to read
Hi all,
OK, I've now detected the pattern.
If you forward a message, a copy of the message sent is not placed in
the "Sent" folder and this is why hitting Ctrl+backspace to find the
forwarded message copy will not work. I guess this is reasonable
since you already have a copy of the
Hi all,
In the view folder window, I use Ctrl+arrows to move from message to
message. Shift+Ctrl+arrow is supposed to delete the displayed message
and move to the next. This is not working as it should. The shortcuts
work in the reverse fashion.
Shift+Ctrl+Up arrow is supposed to delete
Hello The Bat! developers,
I'm using The Bat! Version 1.38e
under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6
and would like to report a bug
The bug description:
Sometimes the message list popup indicator gives the incorrect
amount messages selected. I was not initially having this
ction".
--
Allie Martin, Mr. | Using The Bat! v1.38e
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Windows NT 4.0 (Service Pack 6)
[ time is a waste of life ]
--
--
View the TBUDL archi
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000 17:58:25 +0100, Carsten Dreesbach wrote:
[..snip..]
MD What registry keys do I need to backup to ensure that I can keep a
MD copy of all the account information that doesn't get stored in the
MD configuration files?
Having just checked myself, because I was interested as
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000 17:15:18 +, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
NA There doesn't seem to be any consistency. The remaining 75% of my
NA Mailing List messages all appear in black.
NA Is this something I have control over through Options? Thanks for your
NA help.
No more than you have already
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000 18:33:01 +0100, Peter Steiner wrote:
1. Navigate down the folder tree using arrow keys
2. Come to a folder with sub-folders
3. Hit right-arrow to open the folder
4. Go down with down-arrow
5. Hit left-arrow, go up to parent folder
6. Continue this way until root
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000 18:11:22 +0100, Jast wrote:
J Steps to reproduce the bug:
J Hit reply on a message in a folder with it's own template for
^
sorry, I meant hit "reply to all". Does that work? Normal
reply does of course work.
Yes,
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000 10:33:28 -0800, Nick Andriash wrote:
MDP No more than you have already exerted. What happens is that any
lines MDP that begin with a space will *not* be coloured. If you look
more MDP closely you may see that the quoted lines which appear in
black MDP instead of red are
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000 21:02:47 +0100, Carsten Dreesbach wrote:
AM For both NT and Win9x the key to backup is:
AM HKLM\Software\RIT.
Nope, sorry Allie, but that's wrong! That key _only_ contains some
speller information, like I said. Under NT the actual TB! config is
under the key I
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000 22:03:05 +0100, Windisch Gergely wrote:
I'm thinking of upgrading to 1.38. I've downloaded it, it has features
I need but I havent tried it.
Will it work correctly if I just install it into the same directory
where I have the old version of the bat installed? I Mean I dont
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000 15:06:48 -0800, Nick Andriash wrote:
In addition to the above... still dealing with deleting messages, is
it possible to delete an entire thread with one swoop of the mouse?
The delete button on the toolbar only seems to delete one message at a
time... I've tried alt,
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000 16:17:07 -0800, Nick Andriash wrote:
Ah Allie, you've come through again... thanks so much!! :o) I'll try
that has to be better than deleting them individually or emptying
the whole folder. There are times when there may be 3 or 4 threads, and
I only want to keep
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 08:29:06 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
[..snip..]
As you might have noticed I indent the first line of each paragraph 4
lines.
Do you do this manually? The Bat! in my setup here seems to indent by 8
characters!!
--
-=Allie=- | Using The Bat!
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 20:41:01 +0100, Carsten Dreesbach wrote:
[..snip..]
can anyone confirm this:
1. I have auto-save messages set to 60 seconds
2. Editing a message for longer than that
3. Decide to cancel it afterwards, it asks me "Do you want to save?",
I say no.
4. The auto-saved
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 15:23:04 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
*Steve nudges Ali.*
Huh? Yes? what?
Try moving a "draft" message and see what it asks you.
OK, never tried that before. Hmmm. let's see.
Uh-oh. The plot thickens.
["Would you like to move Parked messages as
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 11:42:46 -0800, Nick Andriash wrote:
What I would like to do when I'm finished reading all of the messages I
want to read in my Folder(s), is right click each Folder and choose
"Mark All Messages As Read", without always having to confirm that
process. I've looked but
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 16:09:54 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Cripes, this is really a mess here. An aesthetic mess. This whole thing
needs to be cleaned up.
Actually, it isn't.
[..snip..]
It is a technical one. They made the decision that a "parked" message in
the outbox is not sent.
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 17:53:27 -0800, Nick Andriash wrote:
[..snip..]
Allie, I got it work after checking the two boxes relating to 'old'
messages, even though I didn't put any values relating to how many
messages, and how old the messages had to be.
GONK!!
The default value of zero is the
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000 13:23:22 +, Tim Fountain wrote:
[..snip..]
However, one thing I don't seem to be able to master is to setup a
filter to catch most of the spam sent to me. I've got quite a few
email addresses (about 30), but all of them contain either 'tim',
'acornarcade', 'iconbar',
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000 08:39:25 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Guys, I have this dim feeling they're not even talking about a browser
here, rather some radically different piece of software... Maybe?
If it is some sort of internet "suite", it has been done and has failed
each time because it ends
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000 14:42:03 +0100, Carsten Dreesbach wrote:
[..snip..]
TF - "Kill file". Right clicking on a message automatically sets up
TFa filter moving messages by that author into a specified box.
You've already got that - hit Ctrl-Shift-F in the message list window
when you've
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000 10:02:54 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
[..snip..]
Please explain why the hell do you insist on calling "harmful" the (little)
feature I've explained in my previous mail message, which explanation you've
deliberately cut out?
Because it requires a paradigm shift in the
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000 13:36:54 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[..snip..]
You may not care to deal with mail from multiple accounts as one, but
some of us do. I don't want to redirect messages all over the place,
bouncing them through my ISP or anywhere else for that matter. For
example, I
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000 13:41:26 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ SNIP ]
A multiple personality type setup may be created by the user with
the use of filters quite easily when I think about it, especially since mail
may be filtered across accounts. The support seems to already be
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000 14:56:38 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, I see now...I thought you were describe the ability to have a
single filter work for different accounts. You just meant to put in
the folder of a different account. You still need different (and
possibly duplicate) filters for
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000 21:31:39 -0500, Derek Cedillo wrote:
[..snip..]
No, MicroSoft product *tells* you what you want. They never ask. 90%
of the people I work with complain regularly about MS and how they
added features that they never need. The difference here is, we are
asking for features,
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000 15:32:14 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
I've forgotten to put Christmas cards inside the envelope before licking
and sealing them, doesn't mean I want a little text on the back of each, "Did
you put the card in first?"
It's one thing to have a popup message appear
On Fri, 7 Jan 2000 15:40:19 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
For anyone who sorts their messages by subject, the two 'threads' would be
merged.
Tough luck. Doesn't mean there should be coddling for it.
cough Err, I beg you a pardon?? I beg to interject here. I
believe every man should
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000 00:49:02 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
It's one thing to have a popup message appear only when you
failed to do something rather than have it appear anytime you wish to
do something. IOW comparing the popup message for deletions that has to
be dealt with upon every
Hi Jason,
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000, at 10:40:12 [GMT -0800] you wrote:
[..snip..]
However, isn't its purpose the same as tbbeta and tbudl? If your forum
rose in popularity, it would mean that we have to look in two places to
keep current with TB discussions: Our email and a web forum.
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000 22:39:37 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
[..snip..]
Ah, then it's not for me. I haven't got IE here at all. I'm a Netscape fan:-)
Oh well, I just *hate* active content Besides, AFAIK many people here
prefer Opera... I'll bet what Netscape doesn't render Opera
Hi Angel,
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000, at 14:40:34 [GMT -0800] you wrote:
Hi there, long time no talk :D I have a favor to ask
Could you pleasepleaseplease post this entire email (not just the forwarded
message, ALL
of it. :D ) to the TheBat! TBUDL list?
Oh certainly. I will try
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000 23:14:49 +0100, Jast wrote:
I prefer Mailing lists to web forums as well. But you can read them
offline. I used Fetch (forgot where to get it) to download and read
some webboard content, and it worked rather well. Of course you
download some redundant stuff too, but
This is a forwarded message
From: Angel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Saturday, January 08, 2000, 5:40:34 PM
Subject: : Re: Mailer Daemon and other confusing stuff
===8==Original message text===
Hi there, long time no talk :D I have a favor to ask
Could you
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000 18:36:13 -0800, Angel wrote:
Testing 1 2 3 this is a test of the emergency AngelTBUDLEmail
Send-System. This is only a test. While the following contents are
truthful opinions nad remarks, this was sent only as a test of the
AngelSendSystem. We now return you to our
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000 20:45:49 -0800, Nick Andriash wrote:
Marck, I'm getting those E-Mails as well, but the Reply-To address, when
posting to this List, IS my own address... still getting the Mailer
Daemon letters.
Whenever the server generates a Mailer Daemon message, a copy is
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000 23:27:47 +0300, Andrew K. Lovetski wrote:
[..snip..]
AM b) Upon creation, the filter rule is added by default to the
AM bottom of the list of filter rules. Since the proper functioning
AM of the filter may depend on where it lies in the filter list, this
AM may create
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 10:13:20 +, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
AM Whenever the server generates a Mailer Daemon message, a copy is
AM mailed to all subscribers. I doubt that you're the cause of them
AM however. I get them as well.
Hmmm. I don't seem to get them :-/. I have had them, but I
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 03:48:42 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
[..snip..]
You also should put a sig delimiter, have the sig less than 5 lines,
write in English, use proper spelling, quote properly, do not ramble on
excessively, not flame someone, etc.
I do not advocate the computer making a
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 03:37:17 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Uhm, no, it isn't. When I move a message from the inbox in
morpheus@rpglink to slamb3@corp the message is physically moved. It is not
"linked" in any way to either account aside from its physical location.
What Alex and
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 21:34:32 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
[..snip..]
SL Yes, use something other than IE. In Opera it opens a new window.
In Netscape it uses the previously open window. So I open a new window
first, go back to TB, and then click on the link. An option "open link
in
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 23:39:29 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
[..snip..]
AM It is IE and Netscape that should provide you the ability to do
AM this and not TB!.
When I right-click on a link in TB, you have an option "open this
link". If I right-click a link in Netscape, I also have an
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 08:50:15 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
What Alex and others have been getting at is that when you move the
message and create a reply, it will use the parameters of the account
and folder to which you moved it and not that of the account and folder
which you moved it from.
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 09:38:30 -0800, Nick Andriash wrote:
Yes. Mailing list, subfolder for each mailing list.
Steve, what is the theory/purpose behind filtering all Mailing List mail
to one main Folder, and then re-filtering from there to your various other
List-specific Folders... that
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 22:06:32 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
[..snip..]
Just look what he says: he calls "virtual folders" idea "personalities paradigm".
He doesn't even care to think it over! He never saw DOS navigator with its
Temp panel, he never saw FAR that utilises the same idea
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 11:26:38 -0800, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
If I understand you correctly, essentially you want to be able to
create folders which, when selected, perform a predefined search on
your message database, right? If that's all there is to it, I could
see that having huge
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 11:34:57 -0800, Nick Andriash wrote:
It's easier to just read messages from 1 folder instead of eight.
Hmmm... perhaps... to some. Personally, I would find it confusing to start
reading 500 messages from 8 different Mailing Lists in one folder.
Well,
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000 08:56:57 +0900, Leif Gregory wrote:
[..snip..]
If you are referring to the MDI as in the multiple window in a single
instance of Opera, then heck no! That alone is the single most
important reason I use Opera. I hated having to open 7 or 8 instances
of IE or NN. When I
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000 23:38:36 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
Virtual folders, mail all in one location.
First of all, *some* mail. Second: *physically*, it is in it's
respective accounts, only the *links* to the messages are in VFs. Hence,
even if you *have* a VF, you still can access
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000 10:33:33 -0600, Nick Danger wrote:
As for Allie, we're all thankful for Allie. But does anyone besides me
ever wonder if he *ever* leaves his computer for more than ten
minutes?! ;-)
Oh, yes I do. :) My profession demands it. :)
--
-=Allie=- |
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000 08:57:19 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Right. And where is the problem of mailing people from one account
as opposed to another. I dunno about you but I file messages my dad
sends me at work to my home account and reply from there. That *IS*
what the home account is
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000 13:39:25 -0800, Angel wrote:
[..snip..]
JT Unless you've got a template screwing around with the To: field, using
JT the Reply command on a tbudl message should put the name in To:.
:( Nope. I hit the reply button on your email and still I am sending an email w/o the
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000 15:10:20 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
I like vim.
Think about it for a minute.
Again, PMMail does it just fine on both Windows and OS/2.
Think another minute. :)
I was experimenting with PMMail and Notetab Pro. I didn't like what was
happening. I had to
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 13:48:18 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
AM I don't think we can be clearer than that. I have only one
AM addition. If I could use virtual folders, I'd use them in my main account
AM *only*.
That's your choice.
Well, of course. I only brought up my personal
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000 22:26:18 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
My reasons for liking MDI interfaces has absolutely nothing to do with
memory consumption. Even if Opera required more memory using MDI, I
would still prefer it. I hated having to randomly choose between the
multiple IE buttons on the
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000 23:39:26 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
[..snip..]
I never use cascades because, as you might have noticed with Opera, some
applications don't play nice in a cascade. Opera, for example, doesn't
recognize clicks for focus on certain areas of the window and in a large
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 09:13:12 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Or auto-completion of header lines, integration of the Address Book
into header lines.
Incorrect, these are still a part of TB! and are editable there.
See PMMail.
Agreed. PMMail still takes responsibility for the headers
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 00:35:12 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
b) To move old messages to ...
For the b) option a browse button with the ability to select a destination
folder, even across accounts would be nice. This makes for an archiving
capability of sorts.
Seems like a
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 00:43:31 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
[..snip..]
Advanced functionality *should* be supported, as much as possible! This
is the major point for me, personally. Of course, provided that it
doesn't bloat the code heavily and doesn't contradict with how the
program
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 00:24:32 -0800, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
[..snip..]
Why would you REQUEST something that limiting? If they offered
filtering by date as well, you can achieve everything you and Allie
have suggested _very_ easily.
Not very easily as you put it. Especially if only
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 12:10:26 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Sounds good to me. What happens in PMMail when you are finsihed
editing and want to send/save/discard the message?
You close the external editor and the PMMail message editor window with
only the header section appears. You may then
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 15:05:40 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
top, kill, and... oh wait, Windows, right, right. Reset key. I've got my
Linux box doing all my important work. Windows is just games. I've given up
on trying to make it stable and just wack the reset key.
My NTWS install here
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 16:29:28 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
[..snip..][..snip..][..snip..][..snip..]
Glad to see you're finally quoting correctly. Amazingly, you're learning.
Forte' Agent, Becky, Poco Mail, PMMail, MR2/ICE, Post Road Mailer,
Transoft Mail, and other less worthwhile e-mail
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 17:04:22 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
[..snip..]
Upon rereading my last message I'd like to apologize to the list in
general. At least the last message was a bit too far. While I still agree
with and stand by everything I said my judgement was clouded in the posting of
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 08:43:20 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
[..snip..]
Let's cut to the chase, shall we? On Winfiles I counted a good ~70 email
clients of various capacities and ~50 programs dealing with news. Let's
figure 20 of those email programs aren't really clients and a good 30 of the
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 21:17:33 +0100, Roel wrote:
[..snip..]
if you want to reply to the 'from'-address, use shift-f4...
Ooops! That should be CTRL-F4. Shift-F4 replies to the reply-to
address but without a message body.
only 'drawback' (i think it's a feature actually!) is that you'll
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 13:36:19 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
I wanted to take these two sentences, isolate them, and then have
people read them together as this is the main thrust of my argument.
It is because they are all shipping basic editors people are
constantly asking for more
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 19:19:07 -0800, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
Exactly. More is better. Separate parts is better. Monolithic is bad.
Why?
Choice. :)
To some degree you are most certainly correct, but I think it depends
on the task. For example, if the only time you ever do any
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000 14:33:18 +0400, Oleg Zalyalov wrote:
SL Exactly. TB! is an email client, not an editor. They should be
SL concentrating on the email client and its interface, not on an editor.
It's not possible if they will not remove editor at all. If it will be
present while
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000 11:34:27 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Is there ever a changelog to go with the beta versions?
Nope. With each new beta there is usually an announcement of it's
release and what enhancements/fixes are included.
--
-=Allie=- | Using The Bat!
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000 14:13:32 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
[..snip..]
IMHO, yes. I can play a LOT of fun games with you with reply-tos. Since
most people don't display the reply-to in the header information (most clients
don't by default, people normally stick with defaults) someone could
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000 14:43:25 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
[..snip..]
Well, it would help if that feature (CNTL-F4) were in the mouse options
somewhere. Hell, I didn't even know about it.
A toolbar button perhaps? :) I use this feature a lot more than reply
to all and yet it's deep within
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000 16:06:59 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
[..snip..]
*smile* Like I said, I can play with you with reply-tos. Want a
message to go to my debian lists? All I need to do is accidentally send
you a message while in one of those folders since I set the reply-to
back to the
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000 16:45:24 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Nope. There is a choice there that has to be made, why should the
computer assume which address to send to?
Well, technically, if I were to go along with you, the editor should
not place anything in the header of replies because
On Sat, 15 Jan 2000 03:39:05 +0100, Jast wrote:
A checkbox option that should be a macro...
I think *all* message-specific options should be macros because this
allows for better automation per template-file-inclusion - you won't
have to go through a dozen folder checkbox options and
On Sun, 16 Jan 2000 12:17:18 -0800, Tom Plunket wrote:
[..snip..]
AVK This is *not* the problem of TB, it's rather the problem of
AVK Novell or whatever, as I have already proved in one of my
AVK previous messages...
*My* thoughts on being a software developer and developer of
user-level
On Sun, 16 Jan 2000 12:25:28 -0800, Tom Plunket wrote:
2. Is there any way to get The Bat! to burst digests into seperate
messages? One mailing list that I'm on gets 100 messages a day (ok,
not so many, perhaps), and it's WAY faster to download the digests (or
so it seems), and Agent can
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 00:34:28 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
[..snip..]
As of now, my suggestion would be: there exist some programs already
available that "split" complicated MIME structures into individual
messages. You might get one of these (or simply write a Perl script,
it's as
On Sun, 16 Jan 2000 02:48:11 +0700, tracer wrote:
[..snip..]
Allie Using multiple accounts to get around global preferences not
Allie configurable on a per-folder basis. Never thought of that but very
Allie interesting indeed. :)
I am using it, just make sure not to download mail with it
On Sun, 16 Jan 2000 08:57:39 +0700, tracer wrote:
Allie Getright has this new feature where it will download large files by
Allie downloading in a user-defined number of parts from a user-defined number
Allie of servers ... at the same time! It finds the servers and does all the
Allie
On Sun, 16 Jan 2000 19:57:49 -0800, Nick Andriash wrote:
Not here. But I never used auto-indent anyway. ;-)
I've never had it disabled, but then again I've never used it. I've
looked in the help files for a brief description, as well as the FAQ's,
but found nothing. Seeing as I never use
On Sun, 16 Jan 2000 21:30:56 -0800, Nick Andriash wrote:
To see it in action, go to a new line, hit tab, type a word, then
hit enter to go to a new line. Look where the cursor ends up.
Yes, I see what you mean Allie. What would be the purpose of that
feature? You didn't really mention in
On Sun, 16 Jan 2000 22:24:40 -0800, Nick Andriash wrote:
Another thing I noticed, is that when you turn auto-format off from
the new message menu under Utilities, it only turns auto-format off in
that one paragraph.
As soon as you start another paragraph, the auto-format option is
On Sun, 16 Jan 2000 23:04:48 -0800, Nick Andriash wrote:
On the top right hand side, this is what _I_ see:
Blocks
- Persistent blocks
This option restricts you to being able to delete selected blocks of
text only via the Edit|delete menu option. The delete key will not work.
:) I
On Sun, 16 Jan 2000 23:30:48 -0800, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
Heh, oops. What I'm talking about is what you get when you right-click
in a composition window, and hit "Block Type".
Ok, this is pretty cool. I never saw that option before. So now, is
there any way to use the Bat's editor as a
On Sun, 16 Jan 2000 23:32:06 -0800, Nick Andriash wrote:
Heh, oops. What I'm talking about is what you get when you right-click
in a composition window, and hit "Block Type".
Hey, I just tried that in a test reply... I like that. Thanks for
bringing that to my attention... I've never seen
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 02:34:38 -0500, G. Cowling, SRNA wrote:
[..snip..]
TP Perhaps if you want to forward something to someone, you just Forward
TP it rather than redirect it? If I'm "bouncing" something to someone
TP else, I would prefer that my name not be attached to it as I am not
TP
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 00:21:01 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
[..snip..]
Well, technically, if I were to go along with you, the editor should
not place anything in the header of replies because one, it's assuming
that you wish to use the reply to address (duh) and two, it's wrongfully
assuming
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 00:28:51 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
My opinion on this is therefore: The reply-to address is the default
for replying. I don't want a pop-up window, as I don't want a pop-up
window for a missing subject. It is the same case for me.
Until the first time someone sends
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 16:28:27 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
[..snip..]
I hate MIME forwarding, because you always have to click on the
attachment. ;-)
Ah, but the recipient, however, does get his message *intact*, headers
and all. Redirecting the message will alter the headers .
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 00:41:56 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
[..snip..]
I prefer to have 5 specialized editors rather than one capable of doing 5
tasks. Because combined mixer and coffee grinder is bad mixer and bad coffee
grinder.
*ROFL*
Mail Client - Coffee Mixer
Internal Editor
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 18:52:51 +0400, Oleg Zalyalov wrote:
[..snip..]
I don't want to have it in message template, because I will forget to
delete it always -- and I don't want to delete some text from every
message to be able to have it in about 2 or 3 messages a week.
So it is Quick
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 22:18:28 -0800, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
Steve Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We've gone over this, Allie. At first glance that is going to the right
place because of TB!'s broken behavior, configurable or not.
Ok, but why would you *intentionally* put the wrong reply-to
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 11:06:20 +0400, Oleg Zalyalov wrote:
[..snip..]
That is not a problem with external editor which allow scripting. The
problems begin only when you use macros which use information
unavailable to external editor, just because it's external. One of
examples
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 12:00:20 -0800, Tom Plunket wrote:
[..snip..]
So, can I navigate the freaking program without tabbing all over the
universe?
I listen to your troubles with some amusement because I understand.
You forgot the part about spacebar-scrolling through messages and suddenly
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 16:16:58 -0500, Grant Baxter wrote:
[..snip..]
No, not really. Anyone (like me) that has interests in things that
span both newsgroups and maillists, would like (as I do) to be able to
file pertinent info from both newsgroups _and_ maillists into the same
folder. For
1 - 100 of 1737 matches
Mail list logo
