Marten Gallagher, [MG] wrote:
> The reason for possibly changing to IMAP is:
> ISP is prepared to install IMAP.
> and
> I can then do all the manipulation wheh I am (frequently) away from
> the office and the main machine.
> But.. as I said - I cannot afford screw ups becasue IMAP in the event
Subscriber2list, [S] wrote:
> Anyway, the above description of your steps worked great; my
> question is ... how does one back-out of the end result, i.e.,
> return to where ALL messages are listed again versus just the
> messages containing the particular item that resulted from following
> your
Kevin Amazon, [KA] wrote:
> The key issues with regards to IMAP are:
I wanted to add a couple other lacking features that are very useful:
a) selective download message text without attachments on a per
message basis. One can then view the message body over a slow
connection without having to do
Marten Gallagher, [MG] wrote:
>> If you're referring to our little exchange a while back...
> Weell sort of!! :-))
I looked at all your other exchanges and couldn't see where else you
could have considered yourself treated a little harshly. :)
> I wasn't being terribly serious and I und
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What does the <*> mean next to a folder?
It means that the preceeding number represents messages that are on
the server but which have not yet been sync'd locally.
> Why does the number of mails in a folder keep changing up and down -
> 2 then 0 then 2 then 0.
This wi
Britt Henrikson, [BH] wrote:
> So I guess my original question remains unanswered.
It's not a bug since I've never experienced or heard of anyone
experience any buggy behaviour with regards to what you may be
referring to in your original query. :)
Usually it's just that how TB! works isn't full
Plan9, [P] wrote:
> Since you are using 2.11.02 and not one of the later betas you must
> edit the PDSF.msl to include items from the rogues and pcwsmiliys.
> I've sent you a copy of my PDSF.msl by PM so you can see what needs to
> be done.
With each roguemoticon download, you get two files, i.e.
Britt Henrikson, [BH] wrote:
>> In my experience TB behaves the same in folders with identical
>> settings.
> What exactly do you mean by 'settings'? Column settings? They are
> the same in every folder.
Oh. This is likely the root of your problem. You're assuming all the
folders are the same.
Jack, [J] wrote:
> I tried this at one point, trying to isolate a problem. I have three
> accounts. I was able to switch two of them back without any problems.
> The third one switched back but I now have to enter a password for it
> every time I start TB. It's a real pain and no one here knew h
Marten Gallagher, [MG] wrote:
> I understand exactly how IMAP works - I am a web designer and the
> concept of local caching is not alien to me.
> I simply was trying to get a handle on how it looks and feels in The
> Bat.
Hmmm. You're questions have been very general so I couldn't help but
misu
Rich Gregory, [RG] wrote:
AM>> The answer to this sort of requirement lies with IMAP. Is the IMAP
AM>> protocol available to you? If not, then I think we'll just have to
AM>> find a way of shoehorning POP3 into working that way for you.
> Here is how we do it with POP3 only...
Now that's a nea
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I really need some practical advice on this whole business of
> synchronising two copies of The Bat!
The answer to this sort of requirement lies with IMAP. Is the IMAP
protocol available to you?
If not, then I think we'll just have to find a way of shoehorning POP3
int
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're asking pretty basic information here that isn't TB! specific. I
just entered 'What is IMAP' in Google and got some nice links that
explains IMAP and how it works. Starting with some of those links
should have you getting well on your way with understanding how IMAP
Marten Gallagher wrote:
> If, when IMAP is running, can I change back and forth from IMAP to
> POP3 mode for one or more accounts?
No, you can't do this.
You definitely can't change from POP to IMAP. I've tried this. You
have to create a new account and make it IMAP from the outset.
The protoco
Adam wrote:
AM>> Under the Rules Tab, define the string which must always match.
AM>> Click the Add button and define one of the other strings that should
AM>> also match.
> This works very well.
> But, say I don't click the Add button here to add the second string.
> How does it think about the
Adam wrote:
> I was just experimenting a bit, and I am not certain I follow how to
> interpret the Alternatives tab in the Sorting Office.
This allows you to set OR strings to filter on.
So the filter will execute if there's a match with the first defined
string
*OR*
any strings defined in the
Scott Garfinkle wrote:
> For now it's OK -- fortunately, I still have the old .MSG files
> available from pmmail, so I can delete the offending ones
> (fortunately) and re-import them. That still leaves a rather
> cumbersome process for when this happens in the future, though.
> Sigh. I *really* w
Rick Friedman, [RF] wrote:
> Well, the subject is my question. Under View->Message List Columns
> there is a checkbox for "New Thread Sorting". What does this do? I
> have some folders which are threaded by reference. How does "New
> Thread Sorting" affect it?
It will sort the threads according t
Scott Garfinkle, [SG] wrote:
> Is there a way to change the "created" date in a message? I moved
> from pmmail to thebat and imported my messages. I used to sort by
> "received" date/time, but the import process mangles that (any
> suggestions for that, btw?). Now, I have several message that were
G. Minnerup, [GM] wrote:
> This was introduced in the latest version, I believe, or maybe I
> just didn't discover it earlier - but it suits me :-) Trouble is
> every time I restart TB! the Message List window covers the entire
> screen and I have to manually resize the display to bring the other
Wilwilwil, [W] wrote:
> When I click right on an e-mail, in the special context menu, I can
> find "Alternative Forward". What is this ?
You can forward a message in two ways.
- you can create a forward message and have the original message MIME
attached.
- you can create a forward message with
Max Rydahl Andersen, [MRA] wrote:
> If that is what it takes yes ;) My main wish is to say - "hmm...what
> mails have I sent to Alexander Gladilin" and then just click on his
> name and ask TB to answer that question - quickly! And without
> requiring me to add a virtual folder manuallyit's ju
Max Rydahl Andersen, [MRA] wrote:
> A. Message Finder is "lying"
> When searching for messages via "Message Finder" the status bar always
> immediatly says "Search Finished. Found 0 messages" and after a few
> seconds or more e.g. 100 results come in and the status bar still
> states it has found
Sl, [S] wrote:
> 'Smiled when I saw this. AM doubtless had some stupid person in
> mind: Me! ;-)
You are the one who made me realize that one could run the
empty folder command to empty what's locally stored in the cache. :)
> BTW, TB! incl my IMAP account therein is going well at present:
Simon Mikkelsen, [SM] wrote:
> I have just solved my problem, which turned out to be 65000 tmp files
> in a tmp folder I didn't knew existed. It was located at the path
> c:\Documents and settings\\Locale settings\Temp\
> and the files was named bat*.tmp
Did you recently import a lot of messages
Tony, [T] wrote:
> Some misunderstanding here I think, Allie :D
> As long as no messages are bounced because your mailbox is full there
> is not much difference if messages get marked deleted or really get
> deleted.
> What I was trying to say that it can cause problems for some users
> with a ful
Simon Elliott, [SE] wrote:
> I've been using TB! for about 6 weeks now and just had my first AV.
...
> a) Should I be worried by this?
Not really. They're not known to make you lose mail. :) They can be
annoyances though.
> B) Should I send an error report to someone?
You could check bugtraq t
Tony, [T] wrote:
AM>> This is how it has always worked. The messages are marked for
AM>> deletion and are then deleted on the next mailcheck.
> That's usually no problem; but once in a while my mailbox is full.
> At such times I would like my mailbox being emptied ASAP
There are three ways to de
Christopher Brown, [CB] wrote:
> My IMAP folders are not acting up nearly as much these days, but I'm
> still having some trouble. One account has stopped retrieving new
> messages, although the correct number shows up in the folder view
> (under the unread heading, it right now shows "28<*>").
T
Raymund Thomas Tump, [RTT] wrote:
> I noticed that a filter with active action delete on server delete
> the message on the server the next time I open a connection to that
> server. Not really what I expect but works so far.
This is how it has always worked. The messages are marked for deletion
Tony, [T] wrote:
> I just 'ask' TB! to decrypt. Probably some setting but I have no
> idea where to look. Any settings I should look for specifically?
Have you enabled the integration?
Tools//OpenPGP//Choose OpenPGP Version?
--
-=[ Allie ]=- (List Moderator and fellow end-user)
PGPKeys: http:
Bob, [B] wrote:
> Can someone please tell me how to sign a message using GnuPG with TB!
> whereby the signature appears as an attachment rather than inline?
You need to enable GnuPG integration with TB! via the Tools menu's
'OpenPGP//Choose OpenPGP Version' configuration.
When finished, in the e
Julian Beach (Lists), [JB] wrote:
>> Hmmm. This shouldn't be the case. It should open and I confirm your
>> problem. Seems like a bug. Can anyone else confirm this. I'll bring it
>> up on TBBETA
> I cannot confirm this. Double-clicking on the HTML file results in the
> opening warning. If I choos
Tony, [T] wrote:
> Can I explicitly tell TB! to use a certain browser to render a page?
No. TB! will use the default browser for the system.
--
-=[ Allie ]=- (List Moderator and fellow end-user)
PGPKeys: http://key.ac-martin.com
Running The Bat! v2.11.04 on WinXP Pro (SP1)
pgp6mqDgVOqad.pgp
Thomas Fernandez, [TF] wrote:
T>> Much cheaper then dail-up.
> ISDN is close to unaffordably expensive.
Ha! I forgot to mention that part. I pay USD$130/month for my ADSL
connection (768/256 Kbps). That is by no means cheap either.
--
-=[ Allie ]=- (List Moderator and fellow end-user)
PGPKeys
Tony, [T] wrote:
> Now you are mainly talking about spam I think? I tackle spam by
> other means.
The let them come approach? How about approaching it from a broader
POV. If the spammers have less addresses to spam, then they'll likely
use less Internet bandwidth sending spam. The bandwidth being
Tony, [T] wrote:
> Maybe we are talking about different things? Almost all people I
> know are on ADSL/SDSL/Cable. Much cheaper then dail-up. ADSL is a
> booming market here.
:) All the people I know around me speak English.
I was in Japan a couple years ago and met people from many countries.
N
Simon Fincham, [SF] wrote:
> I believe Plugins come into there own if you are using a protocol
> other than POP3 for your E-Mail.
You may also be using POP3 but with encryption. Again, the usual POP3
scanners will not detect viruses over an ecrypted feed. The plugin
helps there.
--
-=[ Allie ]
Kathy Dunham, [KD] wrote:
> I sometimes have the need to copy the contents of an email into
> my PIM for future reference (which also syncs to my PDA). Is there
> a way that when I right click on a message, "Select All", then
> "Copy", that the copying will capture the To:, From:, Subject:, and
>
Tony, [T] wrote:
> I'm a long time Forte Agent user that's looking for a client
> that didn't stop development 5 years ago...
I used Forte' Agent prior to using TB! myself.
> I've been looking through some FAQs but I couldn't find the
> (complete) answers there. Partly because I have the impre
Sl, [S] wrote:
> Further to my recent post re runtime errors - apparently associated
> with ver 2.11.x...I started getting 'error reading database'
> messages (ERDM)...in ver 2.10.03...which doesn't seem to elicit
> runtime error messages
> I invoked Message Finder to find certain messages in
Peter Fjelsten, [PF] wrote:
AM>> My Sent folder is on the server while my Outbox is local.
> So Outgoing mail filters work?
Yes. Though I've been filtering to a local folder. I haven't tried
filtering to server side folders.
--
-=[ Allie ]=- (List Moderator and fellow end-user)
PGPKeys: http:
Peter Fjelsten wrote:
> I wonder if this _incredibly_ basic IMAP feature will ever be
> implemented. It sort of defies the point of IMAP if it doesn't work
> for outgoing mail.
It's implemented but it's buggy. There are a few who aren't
experiencing the buggy server side outbox that I am.
> BTW
rich gregory wrote:
> Sometimes in TB! I'll move mssgs FROM the "sent mail" folder TO the
> folder where the rest of the correspondence with that
> individual/company resides. One really nice thing about Eudora was
> that putting a SENT mssg into any in-box folder would cause the
> header to show
Allister Jenks, [AJ] wrote:
> Woho!
B-) ;-)
> Not only is it not hogging CPU, but it is running *really* fast. I
> had no idea TB! was this quick!
Oh yes, it is fast. I'm happy you can now experience one of the things
I enjoy about TB!.
> Thankyou, thankyou, thankyou, thankyou, thankyo
Robin Anson, [RA] wrote:
> If you _really_ want to do it, you could use XRay (www.xrayapp.com)
> as the tool.
Ironically, I used to use XRay to get *remove* those subject list
prefixes. It can surely insert them too. :)
--
-=[ Allie ]=- (List Moderator and fellow end-user)
PGPKeys: http://key.
Peter Fjelsten, [PF] wrote:
> Having just begun working with IMAP/Exchange again with the same
> difficulties with Outbox/Sent mail as previously I assume that you
> by this mean that IMAP outgoing does not work properly at your end
> either?
Nope. I've never gotten it working properly.
It only
Allister Jenks, [AJ] wrote:
> That last line worries me. I tried to uninstall BayesIt recently
> because I am not using it. TB! basically hung when I tried to quit
> the plugins window and after restarting BayesIt was back.
Seems like the Bayesit plugin is the culprit.
The Bayesit plugin directo
Jacob Cohen, [JC] wrote:
> I just got IMAP enabled, and I wanted to have my sent-messages be
> stored on the server. If I check the "Sent Mail" box in the mail
> management option dialog, and pick the sent-mail folder on my IMAP
> server, it causes outgoing messages to hang instead of sending.
Wh
Chris, [C] wrote:
>> Furthermore, we've seen where off-list moderating takes a list.
C> Is that because the moderators have to coordinate their messages so
C> the offender does not get reprimanded multiple times?
No. The members often feel that what others do on list is fine since
it's not modera
DW Susan wrote:
DS> Created a new local folder and copied both the .TBB and .TBI files
DS> into the new folder. After restarting TB, all the messages show up in
DS> that new folder... but I still can't open any of them. When I deleted
DS> the .TBI file and restarted TB again, the messages don't
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
AM>> Yes, it means running the complete installation.
TF> You should mentioned that TB needs to be closed first.
Yes, thanks. :)
--
-=allie_M=- | List Moderator
PGPKeys: http://key.ac-martin.com
TB! v2.11.03 ยท WinXP Pro SP1
pgpOfU41FWUM7.pgp
Description: PGP signat
Allie Martin, [AM] wrote:
AM> There are some extensions currently available, but none that offer
AM> any real functionality.
Ooops! In all fairness, I forgot about the Enigmail/EnigMIME
extension. This one was nice to use since you could autoPGP/MIME sign
and also autoverify signed messa
Sl, [S] wrote:
S> On another matter...re ThunderBird vs The Bat!...tell me again
S> Allie (and others) what you see as the merits/demerits of both. An
S> obvious difference is TheBat does SO much more...(much of which may
S> be superfluous to many users...eg like DVD players ...or cigarette
S> lig
Sl, [S] wrote:
S> Can anyone tell me if The Bat v 2.11.x (or 2.10.x) has IMAP IDLE ??
S> (which...as I understand it from Mozilla ThunderBird...which I also
S> use...and which has IMAP IDLE...means if you leave your mailer
S> 'on-line'...it will tell you when you have new mail and download it
S> f
Nick Ohare, [NO] wrote:
NO> Still trying to get a friend comfortable with his new version of
NO> the Bat! He called me up earlier and asked me how to imbed an
NO> image directly into the message body of an email and I had no idea
NO> how to do it (I use the Bat! v1.62i).
NO> I'm going have to ass
Nednieuws | Charles, [NC] wrote:
NC> Yes, I am. And should I violate, block me off the list. This is
NC> what you could do with people that violate the list. Send them a
NC> personal warning. If they, as you said, don't respond to this,
NC> block them after a couple of warnings.
In the overwhelmi
Nednieuws | Charles, [NC] wrote:
AM>> It's a challenge keeping the lists to the standard they currently are
AM>> and along the way, we inevitably get comments like yours with a few in
AM>> agreement. That's no problem. They're duly noted. However, the
AM>> moderatorial notes will continue.
NC> Do
Maggie, [M] wrote:
A>> Would you send an example of the link you sent?
M> Here it is:
M>
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0890055602/104-7347640-0256713?v=glance
It works here.
M> It shows to me as clickable and also to another friend who is using The Bat!
I'm not really sure wha
Mm Meister, [MM] wrote:
MM> Another user of The Bat! emailed to say the link I had sent them
MM> did not appear as a link.
Would you send an example of the link you sent?
Did you send the message in HTML or plain text format?
MM> So, I went into that pesky Options|Preferences|Editor/Viewer to
M
Jwayne, [J] wrote:
J> Can the moderator send these seemingly endless "top posting" and
J> "cut mark" messages to the offending poster and not the whole list?
J> It's amazing how many of these I've been getting lately. Wading
J> through these messages is - IMHO - _much_ more annoying than the
J> re
Phil, [P] wrote:
P> Sorry for delay in replying. the weather was too nice to spend time
P> in front of the computer! 2.11.02 made no difference but eventually
P> I traced it to a problem with my firewall. If I turn it off then
P> everything is fine. I don't quite understand why version 2.10.03
P>
Cyrille, [C] wrote:
C> I read also the other threads about installing v2.11., but I did
C> not understand one thing: When you say "install over" do you mean
C> to run the complete installation exe or do you mean just to
C> exchange to old thebat.exe against the new thebat.exe ?
Yes, it means runn
Krister Ekstrom, [KE] wrote:
KE> No, especially not when it doesn't seem to be compatible with
KE> other things than TB! itself. (or am i wrong here) If i'm right,
KE> then i can't help wondering what the benefits of mail chat would
KE> be. I have some friends, but i'm quite alone among them in us
Hello Max,
Sunday, June 6, 2004, 8:09:21 AM, you wrote:
AM>> Welcome aboard though I must admit that IMAP still has some problems,
AM>> one that you've detected below.
> yeah - I'm starting to see the tweaks ... anyone know if these are
> high-priority for the The Bat team ? ;)
> (since I wrote
Urban, [U] wrote:
U> In that case the person who gets the table can do something that is
U> _much_ better: (S)he can tell the sender that doing tables like that
U> isn't necessarily a good thing and show him or her a better alternative.
.. the same can apply for the emoticon issue. In fact the em
Simon Mikkelsen, [SM] wrote:
Check list all coming up with nil snipped.
SM> I think it is a regular bug, and not just the usual errors in the
SM> mailbox files. The problem has existed from I ran 2.11 the first
SM> time, and I have never had any problems with 2.x. It would be too
SM> much of a co
Andre Wichartz, [AW] wrote:
AW> I always thought that the plugins don't care for the protocoll and will
AW> work with imap and pop. The old homepage for bayesit 0.4 said as much.
AW> However, the site for v0.5 says that it doesn't work with imap so there
AW> seems to have changed something.
I dou
Urban, [U] wrote:
U> Even a silly sentence as "The dog says grr and the cat meows"
U> shouldn't be interpreted as "The dog says angry and the cat meows"
U> unless _I_ (the sender) mean it to be so.
I agree with this and simply because IMO, an emoticon is being
inappropriately triggered. Emoticons
Sl, [S] wrote:
S> I am writing this from my (and Allie Martin's) alternate mailer as
S> TheBat (on my PC) is flightless at present.
S> I have submitted a big report to Ritlabs which in short says that I got
S> database reading error reports ...Attempts to repair the base did not
S> work or result
Max Rydahl Andersen, [MRA] wrote:
MRA> I've been using The Bat in the past on and off the last couple of
MRA> years to see when it would get respectable IMAP supportand it
MRA> seems that has finally arrived with the 2.11 release.
MRA> So, now I've bought it to support the great software... :)
Michael L. Wilson, [MLW] wrote:
MLW> It is, in fact, generated by Nod32's imon. I have adjusted and
MLW> adjusted and it will not go away. I found a thread on another
MLW> board that said you had to tweak the registry, but did not tell
MLW> how. Any ideas? I am using the latest version 2
I've nev
Michael L. Wilson, [MLW] wrote:
MLW> I have modified the QT to get rid of many things, but not matter what
MLW> I do, I cannot get rid of this line:
MLW> __ NOD32 1.713 (20040409) Information __
MLW> The 1.713 changes every couple of days. I have tried * and ?? and
MLW> many
Urban, [U] wrote:
U> Because I do NOT want them to use the icons under ANY circumstances. If
U> I write h2g2 it is because I _mean_ the book, not some little image over
U> which I have no control (unless I break into the computer of the one who
U> is receiving the mail and remove it from her/his p
Allister Jenks, [AJ] wrote:
AJ> The compression/purge used to run very slowly for my first account until
AJ> I repaired it. Now that TB! has thrown away about 3/4 of my inbox in
AJ> the repair process, the whole compression/purge is a lot more timely.
AJ> You win some, you lose some. :-(
This i
Chris Weaven, [CW] wrote:
CW> I first spotted the problem when I noticed some of my mail that was
CW> previously being auto-filtered was no longer moving. Fine I thought,
CW> I'll try manually triggering the filter, but again, nothing happened :-(
I no longer am able to leave TB! running for long
Simon Mikkelsen, [SM] wrote:
SM> It is only some tasks which makes it use the abnormal amount of
SM> resources. Some of those tasks are:
SM> *Fetching mail
SM> *Saving an e-mail using CTRL+S (e.g. the one I'm writing now)
SM> *Applying the "NOT spam"-feature to a mail
SM> *Using the internal backu
Thomas Fernandez, [TF] wrote:
TF> Upon Marek's tip, I switched to the HTML editor. I wrote myself an
TF> HTML mail with all features I could put into one message, and it
TF> arrived well. This thing has evolved in TB. Wow.
This is really great to hear. The editor is a basic tool and it really
sho
Jan Rifkinson, [JR] wrote:
JR> 1. IMO, the full width message list view now available is
JR> extremely useful so thanks for that, RitLabs.
Same here. I asked for it soon after I started using TB! in late 1998.
:)
JR> 2. Today I noticed that NOD32/Bat! identifies an infected file
JR> right on the
Martin Webster, [MW] wrote:
MW> the meaning of a communication is the response it illicits - -
MW> rather than the intent of the author.
Wow! Hey, I like that. :)
Where did you read that? I agree with it provided that both the sender
and listener have a good command of the language they're commu
Thomas Fernandez, [TF] wrote:
AM>> I just saw one from mmMeister on HTML editor enhancements. I'm
AM>> pretty sure he's not the only one who has appreciated the HTML
AM>> editor's improvements.
TF> I always thought Maggie was a "she".
:oops: ... I never knew. :)
AM>> Those anti-HTML editor pos
Thomas Fernandez, [TF] wrote:
TF> That's not true. I keep campaigning against the memory leaks, but
TF> mostly on TBBETA, I admit. I am not sure whether your bug is the
TF> same memory leak that leads to sudden crashes or not.
It's not. He describes TB! not properly shutting down while doing a
pu
Gaurav Manchanda, [GM] wrote:
GM> Thanks for the advice Dennis.
:) It would seem that these smileys are more very popular and a
welcome addition for many.
Though I wasn't missing them and certainly not unhappy that they're
now there. They're quite pleasant and look better than their raw text
cou
Boris Gereg, [BG] wrote:
BG> I agree with some of you. I cannot understand why Ritlabs spends
BG> its resources for "features" like smiles, chat... Who needs it?
BG> The one and only reason I switched to Bat was it funcionality -
BG> mailer, no more no less. The more "features" they add, the more
Rich Gregory, [RG] wrote:
RG> These are OPINIONS.
.. Which at times can be harshly worded. If opinions are harshly
worded and are deemed unreasonable, expect harsh retorts from the
advocates you do see your arguments as unreasonable or based on
incorrect impressions/knowledge of what is being cri
Chris Weaven, [CW] wrote:
CW> Apologies if I've missed it somewhere or if I'm OT, but is the a
CW> definitive list anywhere of what combinations produce what smilies, or
CW> is it a case of trial & error/suck it and see?
There's a folder called 'Images' in the TB! installation directory. In
it ar
Chris Weaven, [CW] wrote:
CW> Anyone any ideas why this is happening, as it's VERY frustrating!
CW> Would it have anything to do with both my outbox and sent items
CW> being server side?
It may very well do. Would you try sending mail with your outbox
local? I can send without trouble only when t
Martin Webster, [MW] wrote:
MW> I don't think it's as simple as that... I've got no smilies in this
MW> thread at all now.
This is because the pdsf.msl file has been altered with newer
versions. The cup and beer icons are no longer triggered by (b) and
(c).
--
-=[ Allie ]=- (List Moderator and
Roland Burger, [RB] wrote:
RB> what can be the matter that I don't have automatic spell
RB> checker?
If you're using the Windows plain text or HTML editor, then the
autochecker doesn't work. It will only work with MicroEd.
RB> I have installed intpack.msi, What is OKB and where I can get it?
I
Phil, [P] wrote:
P> I upgraded from 2.10.03 to 2.11 and everything seemed OK until I
P> rebooted my machine. From this point onwards I was unable to
P> connect to my ISP's IMAP server to read mail. I deleted the account
P> and added it again in case the settings were corrupted but was
P> still una
Nick Ohare, [NO] wrote:
NO> Thank you for the blazing fast reply! Unfortunately, I think
NO> I wasn't very specific as to what I was asking. I just talked a
NO> friend into switching over to the Bat! from Netscape mail and he
NO> wants his received messages to show the jpgs in the message body
N
Chris Weaven wrote:
Basically, I want to *move* the IMAP messages to a local folder and
based on date. For example, anything stored in any of my IMAP folders
over 3 months old, I want to remove from the IMAP server and place
in a mirrored folder structure on my local system/disk.
So is anyone su
Ian A. White wrote:
Really, anything that is not supposed to be displayed as normal text
should have some lead-in and lead-out character sequences to make
sure that it cannot be misinterpreted. I suppose this is a case of
something evolving without too much thought.
It would seem that in the cont
Miguel Urech, [MU] wrote:
MU> I fully agree with you and do the same. Messages in lists like
MU> this one can be viewed as threads, why quote then?
Giving no information about the message you're replying to is
unacceptable and assumes that all readers thread their messages. This
actually annoys m
Allen wrote:
Even if all that is irrelevant, there is some value in a strictly inforced
'my way or the highway' approach--if there were conditions on when top
posting was and was not accepted, it would be near impossible to enforce
any sort of quoting policy--since it would all, inherently,
Wayne King, [WK] wrote:
WK> In the latter case, it very much annoys me to have to scroll
WK> down past the quoted text to read the response.
This annoyance leads one to trim when not top posting, another vital
rule for discussion lists, i.e., no overquoting. :)
--
-=[ Allie ]=- (List Moderator
ken green wrote:
One thing that threw a wrench in the workings of my perception on this
was the idea of a physical Inbox, and realizing that new messages at
top more closely resembles a real-world Inbox.
We do it that way since we can't really do any better when managing and
organising physical ob
Sean Rima wrote:
At one stage there was a report that a linux port was going to be done,
I am still waiting :)
Additionally, TB! reportedly runs very well under WINE.
The developers are so occupied with completing/refining new features as
well as debugging, that I doubt we'll be seeing a Linux po
Jacopo Ognibene, [JO] wrote:
JO> More than this, i've noticed that you can add many text after the URL
JO> and TB doesn't wrap. See at the end of the line here:
Yes. What you see in the editor before sending is what is sent,
without any additional wrapping. Technically, this isn't true for long
l
Sl, [S] wrote:
S> Anyone else tried both T-Bird and TB!...especially IMAP??
I more than try them since I currently use them. :)
ThunderBird's IMAP support works more reliably, especially with a
wider variety of connection speeds and servers. However, it's a basic
client otherwise. I fight with i
301 - 400 of 1881 matches
Mail list logo
