-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, November 09, 2002, at 11:00:53 AM PST, Mike wrote:
> On a different subject and possible one that's been asked before? I
> noticed that many of you are using PGP keys. Can someone point me to
> a place that gives the correct procedure to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Wednesday, November 13, 2002, at 10:26:20 PM PST, ETM wrote:
> I use backup regularly but for some folders I would like to save the
> entire folder in a format that can be read away from TB!.
Here's the perfect solution:
Mailbag Assistant:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 5:33:46 AM PST, Allie C Martin wrote:
> For the unwary, using the above macro as described, is not without
> problems. If the user wishes to send a message to an e-mail address
> within one of the TBUDL message bo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Sunday, November 17, 2002, at 3:29:36 PM PST, Allie C Martin wrote:
> If your needs and thoughts of what you wish to achieve are going in
> this direction, then I suggest that its time to install a macro
> tool. PowerPro is very good and is fr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Saturday, November 23, 2002, at 9:47:11 AM PST, Scott Frederick
wrote:
> Some of the accounts require "mail" to be in front of the server
> name and others do not. It seems as though The Bat! is adding "mail"
> when it is not there, causing a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Saturday, November 23, 2002, at 10:39:20 AM PST, Scott Frederick
wrote:
> There is no mail.whatever in my Transport settings but the server
> logs show that The Bat! is sending it with mail added.
That's very peculiar...I've never experienced
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 7:50:23 PM PST, Jonathan Angliss
wrote:
> I don't think there is a key combination to expand and collapse All
> threads.
To expand all threads in a folder, use Ctrl-* ("*"on the number pad).
The only way I can se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 7:11:20 AM PST, Krister Ekstrom
wrote:
> I'm currently evaluating the pro version of Avg and the bat plug-in,
> and i'm not sure i've done everything correctly.
Hi Krister,
If you were only considering using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 6:26:09 AM PST, Nick Dutton wrote:
> Is there any way that I can edit a received message? I use many of
> my TB folders for reference and would like to be able to modify some
> of the messages for clarity etc.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, July 02, 2001, at 1:59:39 PM PDT, Karin Spaink wrote:
KS> On 02-07-2001 at 19:00, Dierk Haasis kindly wrote:
>> SecureBat.
KS> That, or PGPdisk.
I use PGPdisk as well, and it's very good. For those not using a version
of PGP that inclu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, July 03, 2001, at 11:56:54 PM PDT, Dierk Haasis wrote:
DH> As someone who earns at least some of his money with advertising
DH> material I like personal replies/texts, they are much warmer. And
DH> people like to be recognised. That's wha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, July 13, 2001, at 10:36:10 AM PDT, Jan Rifkinson wrote:
JR> Outlook e-mail...
Jan - please watch your language. This is a public forum, and children
may be reading as well. ;-)
Melissa
- --
PGP public keys:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?su
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, July 13, 2001, at 08:59:16 PM PDT, Carren Stuart wrote:
CS> However, if I forget to do it this way and simply click on "New
CS> Message" then select their address from the address book icon on the
CS> right of the composition window, the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, July 13, 2001, at 10:07:21 PM PDT, Carren Stuart wrote:
CS> But, if I just click on "Create new message" on the main toolbar,
CS> which opens the composition window - then if I go to the little
CS> address book icon way over on the right
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I just got my mother to start using The Bat!, and she asked me if a
certain thing is possible. Not knowing quite how - or even if - this
can be done, I come here to ask...
1) The situation:
She receives several messages a day from a company
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, August 03, 2001, at 02:04:32 AM PDT, Ryan Phillips wrote:
> Go to any sent message with an attachment, then delete the
> attachment from the message. Close the message. Then reopen the same
> message (not in a preview but full screen). Doe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, August 14, 2001, at 01:15:54 AM PDT,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks Peter but that doesn't work!
> I cannot drag a folder from one account to another (which is what I
> want to do).
> I have several sub-folders within a TBUDL folder i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, August 31, 2001, at 07:18:23 AM PDT, Timothy J. Luoma wrote:
> ZoneAlarm does not want to let TheBat access the Internet,
> especially for *sending* email, even though it is listed in the list
> of Programs in ZoneAlarm that are allowed I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, September 01, 2001, at 05:10:26 PM PDT, Jacek Wojaczynski
wrote:
> I'd like it automatic! And of course it would be nice to have a
> special "Birthday template" for that.
Yes - as long as your birthday wishes will be sent automatically
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, September 02, 2001, at 02:52:53 AM PDT, Thomas F wrote:
But first, ::Andrew:: wrote:
A>> Personally I don't agree, I think it would be pretty difficult to
A>> identify which emails were from a template and which weren't.
And then Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, September 03, 2001, at 02:03:18 PM PDT, mrten-dop wrote:
> don't try to use the 7.0.x builds as there is no bat! plugin (see
> downloads-area at www.ritlabs.com).
Though there are other reasons some may not want to use a 7.x version
(sour
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, September 06, 2001, at 12:45:31 AM PDT, Nick Andriash
wrote:
> Sure, NOD32 POP3 Scanner works great with most any Mail Client. With
> TB!, just change the POP3 port in Account/Properties/Mail Management
> from 110 to 10500, and don't for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I don't see many (any?) people using v1.53t (I'm still using 1.53o). I
was wondering if anyone here is using v1.53t, and what has changed
since v1.53o?
Melissa
- --
PGP public keys:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=PGP_Keys_8&Body=Please%20se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, October 21, 2001, at 9:57:32 PM PDT, World Cruise Travel
wrote:
> Hi all,
> Is it possible to set up PGP to work from The Bat! ? I mean, with
> some buttons on the menu bars?
Hello,
The Bat! currently has plug-ins for PGP v2.6.3 through
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, October 24, 2001, at 12:47:52 PM PDT, Joseph N. wrote:
> On my screen and processing mail at the same time, therefore, is one
> account that has about 35-40 folders, and another account that has
> about 10 folders. Some folders have upw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, October 26, 2001, at 8:04:43 AM PDT, Nick Andriash wrote:
> My gripe is the amount of time and effort that has been put into the
> HTML'ising of TB! when there are outstanding bugs and features yet
> to be implemented.
Hello Nick,
I woul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, December 29, 2001, at 9:34:40 AM PST, Dierk Haasis wrote:
> 1. 6.5.8 is released by NAI, not by Phil Zimmerman; although is the
> last NAI version he recommended wholeheartedly.
Well, except perhaps for the following bit from this artic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, December 29, 2001, at 2:44:23 PM PST, Geoff Lane wrote:
> Thanks for that -- I've installed the 6.5 plugin from RitLabs and it
> all appears to work. I've uploaded my public key to the root server
> and to the UK server. So, hopefully, t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, January 02, 2002, at 3:39:53 PM PST, sbsi lists wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out how I can reply to an email which comes to
> my "default" inbox but reply to that message using another "email
> account" that I have setup.
Hello Jason,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, January 02, 2002, at 4:41:26 PM PST, sbsi lists wrote:
> However, what I want to have happen is when I pick that specific
> account, I'd like the template that it uses for FWD or REPLY or
> whatever to be used and replace the one in my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, January 03, 2002, at 11:41:56 AM PST, Jim Riccardi, Jr.
wrote:
> Hi, All!! OK... can someone tell me an easy way to manually or thru
> a filter, move all TBUDL messages to a folder?
Hello Jim,
In the Incoming filter rules, I create a r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, January 08, 2002, at 8:41:36 AM PST, Marck D Pearlstone
wrote:
>> such as Ctrl + ' + e to give é, Ctrl + Shift + ^ + a to give â,
>> Ctrl + Shift + ~ + N to give ñ, Ctrl + Shift + : + u to give ü, and
>> so on. I've done all these example
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, January 08, 2002, at 7:21:16 PM PST, Thomas F wrote:
> Now you are telling me there is a "character map application" on my
> Win98 system?
> I had one on Win 3.1, but never found it on Win98. Please let me
> know the name of the applicat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, January 09, 2002, at 9:02:54 AM PST, Luc wrote:
> Yahoo has a feature that...
> I want to do the same with my hotmail account...
eek! Both Yahoo and Hotmail! Are you a glutton for SPAM? :-)
Aside from strongly recommending tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, January 09, 2002, at 11:37:16 AM PST, Luc wrote:
> I forgot to mention in my original post that i have these accounts
> for particular reasons, which are irrelevant at this moment :-)
I've often heard people state various "reasons" f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, January 10, 2002, at 10:10:09 AM PST, Sebastian wrote:
> Make sure as username you put your WHOLE email address, not just
> your part before the @, but include the @gmx.net.
Also... If you use the gmx.net SMTP server for sending, you ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, January 11, 2002, at 11:24:05 PM PST, Luc wrote:
> Standard it's the HTML tab that's active. (atleast with me it is).
> Is there a way to have the plain text tab active so that i don't
> have to switch that on ?
Options/Preferences... The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, January 13, 2002, at 1:29:54 PM PST, Henry Harte wrote:
> What I could/should do to enable "Check mail for All" for al e-mail
> accounts?
Hello Henry,
For each account, in "Account Properties/Options", there is an option
to "Ignore 'Chec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, January 13, 2002, at 7:48:08 PM PST, GeekMaster wrote:
> Anyway, give it a look. I want to say, like you, I am a registered
> user of The Bat, and as I said, I really do think it's among the
> very best apps out there. But, being the fanat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, January 14, 2002, at 1:32:18 PM PST, Ray Vermey wrote:
>>RR> On Sunday, January 13, 2002, 4:24:39 PM, GeekMaster wrote:
>>
>>
>>G>> PocoMail. In some ways, it's less powerful than The Bat, but
>>nobody works harder than PocoMail's
>>G>> a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, January 15, 2002, at 12:20:27 AM PST, Dierk Haasis wrote:
> Why, o why ... again a superfluous HTML mail with bad wrapping ...
Give them an inch, and they take up the whole road... :-(
It really is a dangerous line to cross. People al
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, January 15, 2002, at 7:09:00 PM PST, Nick Andriash wrote:
> You know, I was just thinking that seeing as you've created an
> Account with GMX specifically for PGP Key retrieval only, you should
> be able to filter right off the From: head
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, January 16, 2002, at 3:02:53 PM PST, Nicholas wrote:
= Begin preserved funky quoting ==
M> I prefer PGP to S/MIME, simply because S/MIME sends your complete
public
M> key with every message as an attachment, which effec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, January 17, 2002, at 9:05:36 AM PST, Geordon VanTassle
wrote:
> Hello The,
> I seem to be having some issues trying to set up a PGP auto-send.
[snip]
> ...but something seems to be screwed up.
> I'm using The Bat! Version 1.53d un
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, January 17, 2002, at 10:54:41 AM PST, Geordon VanTassle
wrote:
> Anyway, I have gotten to the point where I set up the auto-response
> according to the instructions, but nothing goes out when I send a
> mail to that account with the para
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, January 17, 2002, at 12:57:53 PM PST, Geordon VanTassle
wrote:
> I sure hope that SOMEONE can tell me where I screwed up! I thought I
> did everything right, but is seems not, for some reason.
Hello Geordon,
Sometimes, it's the most s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, January 17, 2002, at 1:28:34 PM PST, Geordon VanTassle
wrote:
> Still doesn't seem to be working.
> Any other ideas? Or have I stumped you? :)
In addition to having "Active" enabled, is "Manually only" also
enabled? Having both enabl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, January 17, 2002, at 12:42:07 PM PST, Commo Guy wrote:
> Hrm, still doesn't seem to filter correctly.
It worked for me when you posted after trying Peter's recommendation
of starting over with a new filter. Care to post the maito again
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, January 17, 2002, at 4:01:31 PM PST, ETM wrote:
> I think I am going to go eat some worms. I registered last night.
Unless I'm just hallucinating (entirely possible), I seem to remember
reading on the TB! web site - during the "Holiday
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, January 19, 2002, at 3:55:32 PM PST, ETM wrote:
> I have been to the Archives and it appears that I am unable to
> import close to 500 email addresses into TB. Tell me that isn't
> true.
It isn't true. :-) There is a little utility ca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, January 24, 2002, at 8:23:52 AM PST, Thomas F wrote:
> Hello myob,
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2002 16:20:17 + GMT (25/01/02, 00:20 +0800 GMT),
> myob wrote:
m>> I've set TB as as a simple MAPI request handler, using the button
m>> in Options
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, January 24, 2002, at 12:50:41 PM PST, Luc wrote:
> Hi list,
> Strange thing is happening when i receive messages:
> a message i receive through The Bat!, Outlook, Outlook Express,
> comes out wrapped like this:
>>ddhdhddjdjdjdjdjd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, January 24, 2002, at 3:46:56 PM PST, David Conroy wrote:
> However, the text editor just sucks ... doesn't it? Or am I doing
> something wrong.
Hello David,
I am of the opinion that you are doing something wrong. :-) I love
TB!'s messa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, February 04, 2002, at 5:35:49 PM PST, Peter Bennett wrote:
> How the h*** do you enable and disable threading in a folder?
Hello Peter,
You can go to the "View" menu on the toolbar, go down to "View threads
by", and choose "None" (or any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, February 04, 2002, at 8:07:21 PM PST, Dwight A Corrin
wrote:
>> Now if only threading was a per-folder option!
> It is, isn't it, if you don't set a folder to use the defaults?
Yes - it's one of the things I really appreciate about TB!'s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, February 05, 2002, at 4:21:39 PM PST, Peter Kerekes wrote:
> I used in the past Agent for both E-mail and News-group reader. Now
> that I am switching to BAT for E-mail I need on offline Newsreader.
Hello Peter,
Agent *is* an offline ne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I've been playing around with "mass mailing" templates - to send a
common message to a small group. The problem is this:
I would like each recipient to receive the message with *only their
own* address in the "To" field of the headers. So f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, February 09, 2002, at 10:41:51 PM PST, Shahar wrote:
> Create a QT and enable the "Use for new/mass mailing. You can add
> Macros in the template.
> Now go to the address book or group and select all the recipients
> you want to send the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, February 09, 2002, at 11:06:58 PM PST, Shahar wrote:
> 2. Mass mailing using template and this command creates a message
> for each recipient.
Thank you Shahar!
I did it now with a "mass mail" template, and it worked as I wanted.
:-)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, February 10, 2002, at 12:50:13 PM PST, Luc wrote:
> General question: is it a good idea to use Mail Bag Asssitant
> together with TB! or is it not necessarily ? Are the functions TB!
> has sufficient or has MBA something to add?
Hello Luc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, February 14, 2002, at 9:27:55 AM PST, Stuart Brook wrote:
> Now, I've assumed this to be a CRAM MD-5 authentication. Pegasus and
> Poco both seem to work OK in doing the authentication, but I cannot
> get The Bat! to authenticate.
> I g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, February 14, 2002, at 10:08:52 AM PST, Stuart Brook wrote:
> Now I tried it as no MD-5 and got the same result ... but I recall
> some other settings that might impact that.
Hello Stuart,
Why don't you try it with the following setting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, February 14, 2002, at 1:26:30 PM PST, Stuart Brook wrote:
> That won't work, because it isn't ... I retrieve mail from one ISP
> and send mail through another.
Well, you could enable "Use specific settings", and type in the "mail
retrie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, February 14, 2002, at 3:47:47 PM PST, Nick Andriash
wrote:
> What do you have to do for it to work? It just sits there in my
> System Tray, and I cannot figure out what it needs to act as a local
> SMTP Server. I don't see a manual with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, February 16, 2002, at 2:07:46 AM PST, Lionrhod wrote:
> 1) Whether I want it or not, this program wants me to send mail,
> which, as you see, say "Hello _(name/email addy)_" and "Best
> regards,"
> I have already tried making a blank pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, February 22, 2002, at 1:06:30 PM PST, Shoebuddy Jones
wrote:
> When I put mail in the trash it is marked as read. I get a ton of
> spam and do not want to mark email as read as I'm afraid I am
> sending them some sort of confirmation that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, February 23, 2002, at 10:22:48 AM PST, chas wrote:
> ...back to outlook express.
eek! I'm not sure if or how that can be done, but if it can be, I'm
sure someone here will be able to help you.
I just can't quite get my mind around the
Hi Martin,
On Monday, October 27, 2003, at 10:10:17 AM PST, you wrote:
> There's some merit in having the mail folder under Documents and
> Settings (XP) and I guess this could be a future install option.
> Albeit there's nothing stopping you from doing this now.
I keep my TB! mail folder in an
Hi Nick,
On Monday, October 27, 2003, at 3:29:48 PM PST, you wrote:
> What if you would want a choice as to which address is used to send
> that particular message... is that possible with TB's AB? By the
> looks of it, it's not. :o(
Here's what I do...
I create separate address book entries fo
Hi Nick,
On Monday, October 27, 2003, at 3:29:48 PM PST, you wrote:
> What if you would want a choice as to which address is used to send
> that particular message... is that possible with TB's AB? By the
> looks of it, it's not. :o(
Oops! I also forgot to mention that I can access the "favorite
Hi Marck,
On Monday, October 27, 2003, at 4:03:30 PM PST, you wrote:
> Click on the right-most icon (hint text is 'address book') in a
> message address line to get to the address picker. Right click on
> the AB entry in the let hand list box. If it has alternate address,
> that's how you can get
Hi Allie,
On Saturday, October 25, 2003, at 9:10:44 PM PST, you wrote:
> Your setup sounds exactly like mine does. I'm at a loss as to what
> the problem is. I'll keep experimenting to see if I can reproduce
> the problem.
A small update (though nowhere near finished testing all
possibilities ye
Hi Peter,
On Tuesday, October 28, 2003, at 12:38:30 PM PST, you wrote:
> Am I missing something, or is the To: "hyperlink" simply not
> functional to open the address picker?
It works here with all three...To, CC, and BCC
--
Melissa
PGP public keys:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]&Body=Please%20send
Hi Darrin,
On Wednesday, October 29, 2003, at 5:00:35 AM PST, you wrote:
> I went to http://www.pgp.com/index.html. Is this a good place to get
> PGP for TB? Or is there another?
The PGP site is the *best* place to get "official" PGP. :-) If you
install any of the "official" PGP builds, there's
Hi Melissa,
On Wednesday, October 29, 2003, at 8:51:48 AM PST, I wrote:
> The PGP site is
Oops! I'm not sure what I did, but in checking my signature, I see
that I apparently accidentally signed the last message with two
different keys! For purposes of keeping my email traffic slightly
organized
Hi again Melissa!
On Wednesday, October 29, 2003, at 9:04:58 AM PST, I wrote:
> Oops!
Oops again! :-) Apparently, I didn't manage to double-sign that
previous message. I think that I had just forgotten to close that
silly "PGPlog" verification window after verifying a different
message, and wh
Hi Michael,
On Wednesday, October 29, 2003, at 10:30:12 AM PST, you wrote:
> I've never used pgp, but the discussion on here has made me curious.
> I checked the pgp.com website, but I still have only the vaguest
> idea of how it works.
In addition to the copious documentation that comes with PG
Hi Andy,
On Wednesday, October 29, 2003, at 12:09:34 PM PST, you wrote:
> In short, to decrypt a message from someone, you need *their* public
> key, and you need *your* private key. Imagine a door with two locks,
> to unlock it you need BOTH keys.
Well, not really. If you have my public key, yo
Hi Paul,
On Thursday, October 30, 2003, at 3:21:46 PM PST, you wrote:
> so, if he is using M2, why is he on a TB mailing list?
Could be any of several reasons...
He/she could just be using a computer in which TB! isn't installed. Or
could just be interested in learning more about TB! with the i
Hi Maggie,
On Thursday, October 30, 2003, at 4:32:52 PM PST, you wrote:
MR>> In any event, I'm happy to welcome anyone who wants to learn more
MR>> about this wonderful email client! :-)
> Especially if they bring the mole recipe.
Indeed! :-)
--
Melissa
PGP public keys:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
Hi Vasiliy,
On Thursday, October 30, 2003, at 1:11:03 PM PST, you wrote:
> Hmm... And what are you means? I don't understand.
We're still waiting for the mole recipe. :-)
--
Melissa
PGP public keys:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]&Body=Please%20send%20keys
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signa
Hi DZ-Jay,
On Friday, October 31, 2003, at 2:45:24 AM PST, you wrote:
> Can't you just let it go and concentrate on other *real* TB-ish
> topics?
Not until we get that mole recipe! :-)
--
Melissa
PGP public keys:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]&Body=Please%20send%20keys
pgp0.pgp
Descripti
Hi Darrin,
On Friday, October 31, 2003, at 6:30:38 AM PST, you wrote:
> (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]&Body=Please%20send%20key
> For some reason it isn't recognizing (%20send%20key) this part of it.
Here's the reason:
Since TB! recognizes its own macros by the "%" symbol at the beginning
of the ma
Hi Douglas,
On Friday, October 31, 2003, at 5:33:35 AM PST, you wrote:
> Upgrades rarely cost the same as an original purchase.
Which can be a good thing. Unfortunately, in the case of my favorite
Office software (StarOffice), the "upgrade" from v6 to v7 is basically
a "full price bug fix"! :-(
Hi Peter,
On Friday, October 31, 2003, at 12:28:28 PM PST, you wrote:
> I'm sure you know about OpenOffice, which is the open source edition
> derived from Sun's StarOffice. Couldn't that be an option for you?
I have OpenOffice as well, but I like the added features of StarOffice
(v7 has the abi
Hi MAU,
On Friday, October 31, 2003, at 1:10:20 PM PST, you wrote:
> Wasn't StarOffice free some time ago (a few years)?
It was if you downloaded it (I have a cable connection, so downloading
the rather large SO v5.2 was quick and easy). That policy was
discontinued with SO v6 (post beta testing
Hi Douglas,
On Friday, October 31, 2003, at 1:36:14 PM PST, you wrote:
> I see you're using La Chauve-Souris! (v2.01.3) as your mailer. Does
> that mean you're using Linux?
Hee hee...no. It's "The Bat!" in French. :-)
--
Melissa
PGP public keys:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]&Body=Please%20send%2
Hi rich,
On Sunday, November 02, 2003, at 10:49:30 AM PST, you wrote:
> The vulgar literal translation to English is "The Bald Mouse!".
I know...but I still think it looks nice. :-)
In any vulgar translation from one language to another, there can be
interesting cultural connotations inferred.
Hi Rich,
On Monday, November 03, 2003, at 8:46:00 AM PST, you wrote:
> I have NEVER been able to send ANY email from TB! with any HTML
> component. It just WILL NOT SEND. I can ONLY send mail from TB! if I
> choose one of the 2 text options. Very frustrating!
:-) You make a good thing sound lik
Hi Jonathan,
On Tuesday, November 04, 2003, at 7:54:09 PM PST, you wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
For some reason, GnuPG doesn't like the very long "Version:" comment
line in your signature (PGP didn't care, and verified the signature as
"Good"):
gpg: armor header: gpg: armor heade
Hi Melissa,
On Tuesday, November 04, 2003, at 8:02:35 PM PST, you wrote:
> For some reason, GnuPG doesn't like the very long "Version:" comment
> line in your signature
I see what happened...
I first verified your message in the message preview pane, and the
long comment line was wrapped to fit
Hi Jonathan,
On Tuesday, November 04, 2003, at 9:43:42 PM PST, you wrote:
> Hrm, then I'd say that would be a bug in TB as it is altering the
> content of the mail to view (which I think isn't bad), but passing
> the modified version to GPG... which is bad.
On the other hand, PGP seems to be loo
Hi Kitty,
On Tuesday, November 04, 2003, at 10:32:05 PM PST, you wrote:
> I did check my editor preferences. It is set to wrap lines at 70!
This is very curious, as your lines are still not wrapping here. Did
you check under the "Utilities" menu in your message editor to see if
"auto-wrap" is
Hi Marck,
On Wednesday, November 05, 2003, at 1:54:36 AM PST, you wrote:
> I'm clicking on the '?' icon to verify and letting the built-in
> GnuPG support handle it rather than using GPGShell hotkeys to check
> the window. Like I say, all signatures are good here.
That may well make the differen
Hi Bo,
On Wednesday, November 05, 2003, at 11:13:42 AM PST, you wrote:
> I have not found a simple way of going "off-line" yet.
This is something I'd really like to see as well. I have a cable
connection that is always on, and I have to stop *all* traffic via my
firewall or unplug the cable (wit
Hi Bo,
On Wednesday, November 05, 2003, at 12:21:52 PM PST, you wrote:
> I checked my settings ... seemed to be OK ... except I had to switch
> to use MicroEd ... hope that does the trick!
Your wrapped lines look good here now. :-)
--
Melissa
PGP public keys:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]&Body=Ple
Hi Bo,
On Wednesday, November 05, 2003, at 12:53:53 PM PST, you wrote:
> ...you by any chance taking classes up on the hill there in
> Valencia? Cal Institute of the Arts?
I'm an alumna of CalArts ('78-'82). The school gave me a couple of
"email addresses for life" to use as I please, so I conti
Hi Marck,
On Thursday, November 06, 2003, at 8:22:41 AM PST, you wrote:
> Either 1) the connection is permanent and the checking frequency is
> immaterial and there is no problem to start with ...
Here are some of *my* concerns...
I have a cable (ethernet) connection, and by default, it's alway
Hi Tony,
On Thursday, November 06, 2003, at 8:51:12 AM PST, you wrote:
> I can't believe your moaning about an always on connection.
Was I "moaning" about my BB connection? Or was I saying that I felt
there could/should be a way to easily toggle online/offline...without
either tedious account b
Hi William,
On Thursday, November 06, 2003, at 11:27:14 AM PST, you wrote:
> Do you not have the option to block by application?
Even if I do, this would not alleviate annoyance caused by 10 error
beeps every five minutes when TB! insists on polling...regardless of
whether or not I've stopped tr
101 - 200 of 314 matches
Mail list logo
