cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session StandardManager.java

remm2002/12/09 23:46:38 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session StandardManager.java Log: - Remove getNewSession (moved to the superclass). Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +4 -12 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/or

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 12263] - response.sendRedirect won't send to Tomcat SSL

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

OK, seems I don't have any supports to stay with my -1 (seems nobody care about the AdminTool argument :-)). So I will change my mind and vote 0. -- Jeanfrancois Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 10/12/02 0:30 "Jeanfrancois Arcand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Now, don't tell me that ALL that colle

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin ApplicationResources_ja.properties

amyroh 2002/12/09 17:56:36 Modified:webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin ApplicationResources_ja.properties Log: Port the Japanese properties file update in admin from tomcat 4. Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +19 -3 jakarta-t

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin ApplicationResources_ja.properties

amyroh 2002/12/09 17:55:41 Modified:webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin ApplicationResources_ja.properties Log: Updates the Japanese properties file in admin between 4.1.7 and 4.1.16. Patch submitted by MORIGUCHI Hirokazu <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [4.1.17] Tag soon ?

I wasn't able to run the additional benchmarks like I wanted, since the cpu fan on my workstation is dying and causing BSOD. I'm in the process of setting up my X1, so I will re-run the benchmarks on that server and post the results. peter lin Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I d

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

On 10/12/02 1:06 "Justyna Horwat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I guess the high art of potty humor is not lost on idiots. My buttocks > are clenched in anticipation for the Pier (C) and TM fart jokes. :) Damn you know me far too well, Justy! :-) Pier -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

I guess the high art of potty humor is not lost on idiots. My buttocks are clenched in anticipation for the Pier (C) and TM fart jokes. :) Justyna Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 9/12/02 9:16 "Jon Scott Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What I would love to see is a tree of downloads where eac

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

On 9/12/02 23:58 "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But in this case you keep making false statements, and not only here. It > should be quite easy to look for a [VOTE] or [PROPOSAL] that you made > and was voted on tomcat-dev. I swear that _LOVE_ my mates... My friend Tonia, who's a

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

On 10/12/02 0:30 "Jeanfrancois Arcand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Now, don't tell me that ALL that collection of cruft doesn't have a bug... >> It's just that we are lucky and noone found them yet (given enough eyes... >> Linus says)... >> > I never say that and I will never says that. But I l

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 9/12/02 23:06 "Jeanfrancois Arcand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 9/12/02 17:14 "Jeanfrancois Arcand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Youy don't need to learn JSP/Admin Tool if you don't use it. The actual Tomcat installation doesn't re

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

On 10/12/02 0:10 "Jon Scott Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> But in this case you keep making false statements, and not only here. It >> should be quite easy to look for a [VOTE] or [PROPOSAL] that you made >> and was voted on tomcat-dev. > > Then find it. I believe it never even went to [

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Pier Fumagalli wrote: > They come up every now and then... That's why Costin wanted that > all-private for your eyes only noone who is not cross checked with the FBI > gets in security mailing list, right?... Wrong. The list is for all tomcat committers - and all security information will be post

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

On 9/12/02 23:51 "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ehemm... With 24 pages of vulnerability notes? Ha.. Hahaha Hahahaha! :-) Correction to self... Not 24 pages... 24 notes... (Ok, I have an eyesight test tomorrow morning at 10:20 in SOHO... I know, I know...) Pier -- To unsu

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

on 2002/12/9 3:58 PM, "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's hard to find something that doesn't exist. ? > I hate the practice of using old postings as arguments in most cases - > it's normal for people to change their minds. There is a difference between changing your mind and m

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

Pier Fumagalli wrote: >>> I remember that when I proposed the same thing (roughly) and wanted to >>> call it "Tomcat-HA" or something like it, you said: >>> >>> "If possible, please also change the name - unless ASF gives you >>> permission to use tomcat name in your product." >> >> Can you poin

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

On 9/12/02 23:38 "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pier Fumagalli wrote: > >> On 9/12/02 15:16 "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Since things may get confusing around here, I would like to >>> have an official vote on my prior proposal. >>> >>> This is the list

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

On 9/12/02 23:06 "Jeanfrancois Arcand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pier Fumagalli wrote: > >> On 9/12/02 17:14 "Jeanfrancois Arcand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Youy don't need to learn JSP/Admin Tool if you don't use it. The actual >>> Tomcat installation doesn't require you to learn the

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

Pier Fumagalli wrote: > On 9/12/02 15:16 "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Since things may get confusing around here, I would like to >> have an official vote on my prior proposal. >> >> This is the list of included features: >> >> Libs: >> - JMX >> - JAAS >> - JNDI >> - diges

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/resources messages.properties messages_es.properties messages_fr.properties messages_ja.properties

luehe 2002/12/09 15:27:04 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Validator.java jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/resources messages.properties messages_es.properties messages_fr.properties messages_ja.prop

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 9/12/02 17:14 "Jeanfrancois Arcand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Youy don't need to learn JSP/Admin Tool if you don't use it. The actual Tomcat installation doesn't require you to learn the Admin Tool or JSP As I said 6 or so months ago... That "thing" is a

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

On 9/12/02 15:16 "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since things may get confusing around here, I would like to > have an official vote on my prior proposal. > > This is the list of included features: > > Libs: > - JMX > - JAAS > - JNDI > - digester ( and beanutils, collections it n

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

On 9/12/02 17:14 "Jeanfrancois Arcand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Youy don't need to learn JSP/Admin Tool if you don't use it. The actual > Tomcat installation doesn't require you to learn the Admin Tool or JSP As I said 6 or so months ago... That "thing" is a security hole as big as the Em

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

On 9/12/02 9:16 "Jon Scott Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What I would love to see is a tree of downloads where each one gains more > and more features (it is additive). Such as: > >JSR-154 Implementation > / \ >Jasper

Re: [PATCH] Update Tomcat-Admin-ja ResourceFile

Sorry, I made a bit mistake. This attachment file is correct. Thanks. MORIGUCHI Hirokazu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, Tomcat Commiters, > > This patch updates a Japanese resource file of Tomcat Administration Tool. > (ApplicationResources_ja.properties) > I translated the messages modified

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

On 9/12/02 3:59 "Jeanfrancois Arcand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (2) The Admin Tool should go with the minimal distribution of Tomcat. We > decided to include JMX in Tomcat distribution...what's the point having > JMX and not the Admin Tool? Maybe JSP is not required by all Tomcat > users, but I

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Validator.java

luehe 2002/12/09 14:26:10 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Validator.java Log: When verifying that a custom action does not have any invalid attributes, take the attributes' URI into account. Revision ChangesPath 1.56 +28 -4 jakarta-tomc

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15189] - Error message provided when jsp:param element is not used properly is misleading

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/resources messages.properties messages_fr.properties

luehe 2002/12/09 14:17:32 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Parser.java jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/resources messages.properties messages_fr.properties Log: Fixed Bugzilla 15189: Error message provided when jsp:par

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15201] New: - ClassCastException in JkCoyoteHandler.action() with SSL

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

oracle 9i jdbc driver -- class12.zip or class12.jar

Hello, I just installed the Tomcat package, and now try to find oracle 9i jdbc driver, class12.zip or class12.jar. Does any one know the path to download this file? I am using PC version Oracle 9i. Thank you very much. Ping 12/9/02 __ Do you Yah

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Parser.java

luehe 2002/12/09 13:51:57 Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Parser.java Log: Standard syntax: - Added uri and local name to custom action attributes. - Enforce restriction that if a dynamic attribute has a prefix that doesn't map to a namespace (tagli

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Jon Scott Stevens wrote: >> If Sun or anyone else wants to release a JSR154-only product - they >> can do it and we should make it easy to do so. >> I don't think we should do it ( as tomcat community ). > > Why? So far, you haven't even given a real reason. That may be because every reason you

[PATCH] Update Tomcat-Admin-ja ResourceFile

Hi, Tomcat Commiters, This patch updates a Japanese resource file of Tomcat Administration Tool. (ApplicationResources_ja.properties) I translated the messages modified/added between 4.1.7 and 4.1.16. I made it as such: $ diff -u \ > jakarta-tomcat-4.1.16-beta-LE-jdk14-original/server/webapps/a

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

on 2002/12/9 12:33 PM, "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, I speak for myself. I like and use jasper - and I think the tomcat > official releases should include both tomcat and jasper. All of the official releases or some of them? > If Sun or anyone else wants to release a JSR154

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > on 2002/12/9 7:51 AM, "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> No Jon - my vote wasn't based on your biasses about jasper, but on the >> biasses of many members of the tomcat community. > > So, you speak for these people? I don't think so. No, I speak for my

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/cluster JGCluster.java JGManager.java ReplicatedSession.java ReplicationStream.java SerializablePrincipal.java SessionMessage.java

>After reloading and passivating, the node will pull the list of sessions >from the monitor. I agree this could end up out of sync, but this is a >useful feature, otherwise the sessions go with the cluster. actually, once I have the primary/secondary implementation, the secondary server can store

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

on 2002/12/9 9:37 AM, "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Then make a proposal that "maximum 2 tomcat binary distribution should be > allowed". I will -1 this vote. -jon -- StudioZ.tv /\ Bar/Nightclub/Entertainment 314 11th Street @ Folsom /\ San Francisco http://studioz.tv

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

on 2002/12/9 9:37 AM, "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't see why a vote on Jon's proposal would affect my proposal > ( or any future vote ). I agree. -jon -- StudioZ.tv /\ Bar/Nightclub/Entertainment 314 11th Street @ Folsom /\ San Francisco http://studioz.tv/ --

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

on 2002/12/9 9:14 AM, "Jeanfrancois Arcand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I personally think that this is a much cleaner way of providing >> distributions because it does not require people to learn or deal with >> things they do not care about. Options are a good thing. Let's not limit >> ourselv

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

on 2002/12/9 8:21 AM, "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > People cannot agree on everything. Here, we're talking about relatively > minor topics. > This issue won't end up in a division of the community, but rather in > one additional binary distribution based on the same codebase. I can

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

on 2002/12/9 7:51 AM, "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No Jon - my vote wasn't based on your biasses about jasper, but on the > biasses of many members of the tomcat community. So, you speak for these people? I don't think so. > 5.0 was supposed to be the release we make togheter,

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

on 2002/12/9 7:32 AM, "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What about using a minimal tomcat core with plugged modules to give > access to jsp/jmx ? > > Will make both Costin, and Jon happy and let us have only one > distribution with clear indication in server.xml on how to > activate/

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

on 2002/12/9 7:27 AM, "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd really like to avoid the proliferation of too many distributions. I don't agree with that. There is nothing wrong with giving users choices. -jon -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional comma

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

on 2002/12/9 7:16 AM, "Costin Manolache" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Votes: > [ ] +1 I like the idea, I might help > [ ] -1 I don't like the idea, I won't help. +0 I don't have time to help, but I like the idea. -jon -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional comma

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

Votes: [X] +1 I like the idea, I might help [ ] -1 I don't like the idea, I won't help. Costin -- Jeanfrancois -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

Costin Manolache wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Votes: [ ] +1 I like the idea, I might help [ ] -1 I don't like the idea, I won't help. I'll have to vote -1 until the other vote completes, and then, I'll either be: - +1 if Jon's proposal doesn't pass - -1 if Jon proposal is accepted, unless Jasp

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/clusterJGCluster.java JGManager.java ReplicatedSession.java ReplicationStream.javaSerializablePrincipal.java SessionMessage.java

Filip Hanik wrote: Remy wrote: I'd like to get the save/restore on shutdown features of the std manager, and can't really see any major problem it would cause. could be a little tricky. how would you do this without getting the nodes out of sync. After reloading and passivating, the node w

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session ManagerBase.java

remm2002/12/09 11:07:36 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session ManagerBase.java Log: - Add missing commit for the cluster features. Revision ChangesPath 1.6 +16 -6 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apach

mod_jk/mod_jk2 binaries for FreeBSD and Apache 2.0.43

Please, can you send me JK/JK2 binaries for Apache 2.0.43 FreeBSD ? thanks, Andy ---should provide new binaries for JK and JK2. I'll do JK/JK2 for Lin

RE: Tomcat without DOS Window on Win XP, i.e. like an NT Service?

> -Original Message- > From: micael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 1:11 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Tomcat without DOS Window on Win XP, i.e. like an NT Service? > > > Anyone know how to start Tomcat without the DOS window on Win XP? > > Micael S

Tomcat without DOS Window on Win XP, i.e. like an NT Service?

Anyone know how to start Tomcat without the DOS window on Win XP? Micael --- This electronic mail transmission and any accompanying documents contain information belonging to the sender which may be confidential and legally privileged. This

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/cluster JGCluster.java JGManager.java ReplicatedSession.java ReplicationStream.java SerializablePrincipal.java SessionMessage.java

Remy wrote: >I'd like to get the save/restore on shutdown features of the std >manager, and can't really see any major problem it would cause. could be a little tricky. how would you do this without getting the nodes out of sync. > >> then, when a server joins a cluster, there is a possibility t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15189] New: - Error message provided when jsp:param element is not used properly is misleading

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Henri Gomez wrote: > What about using a minimal tomcat core with plugged modules to give > access to jsp/jmx ? There is already some support for that ( server/webapps is very similar with the 3.3 "modules" - i.e. trusted components ). It'll need few changes to deal with the loader issues ( i.

Re: [4.1.17] Tag soon ?

Remy Maucherat wrote: > > I don't see any major issues with 4.1.16, so I plan to tag 4.1.17 (which > hopefully would be the next stable build) tomorrow after a few more > minor tweaks. > > There was a report made against JK 2 immediately after 4.1.16 Beta was > announced. Can someone confirm ther

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

Remy Maucherat wrote: >> >> Votes: >> [ ] +1 I like the idea, I might help >> [ ] -1 I don't like the idea, I won't help. > > I'll have to vote -1 until the other vote completes, and then, I'll > either be: > - +1 if Jon's proposal doesn't pass > - -1 if Jon proposal is accepted, unless Jasper is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15105] - pushBody()/popBody() error on tomcat 4.1.12

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3888] - WebappClassLoader: Lifecycle error : CL stopped

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Glenn Nielsen wrote: Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote: Jon Scott Stevens wrote: Create a separate minimal JSR 154 only distribution of Tomcat 4.x: +1 [] 0 [] -1 [X] -jon (1) Jasper is very a very small jar file. (2) The Admin Tool should go with the minimal distribution of Tom

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Jon Scott Stevens wrote: What I would love to see is a tree of downloads where each one gains more and more features (it is additive). Such as: JSR-154 Implementation / \ Jasper Velocity / \

RE: Patch for isapi_redirector2

Hola Joakim: > I'm not sure where to send the patch, I hope I don't abuse > this list by > submitting it here. Thanks !!, please read http://jakarta.apache.org/site/source.html to know to do it, and the format needed.. You can send it to this mail list and/or post it in bugzilla to, dont forge

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15185] New: - problem with SSL and jdk1.4

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Costin Manolache wrote: Jon Scott Stevens wrote: One last point, we should be able to experiment around here. The negative votes have been based on biases about what I think about Jasper and my opinions. They are not based on the idea that experimentation is a good thing and I think that

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > One last point, we should be able to experiment around here. The negative > votes have been based on biases about what I think about Jasper and my > opinions. > They are not based on the idea that experimentation is a good > thing and I think that is just plain wrong

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/valves PersistentValve.java

jfclere 2002/12/09 07:57:43 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina Manager.java catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session FileStore.java JDBCStore.java ManagerBase.java PersistentManagerBase.java Added:

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

Costin Manolache wrote: Since things may get confusing around here, I would like to have an official vote on my prior proposal. This is the list of included features: Libs: - JMX - JAAS - JNDI - digester ( and beanutils, collections it needs ). - modeler - ant ( used for startup and automation

Re: adding content-type for Apache 2.0 jk/jk2

Henri Gomez wrote: Hi, I'm playing currently with mod_jk + mod_deflate on Apache 2.0, and it seems it will be needed to set the content-type in response in Apache 2.0 to allow mod_deflate to compress only text/html, text/xml contents. It seems in that case will need to parse the tomcat response

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Remy Maucherat wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: If the vote actually passes, I'd like to have only one minimal Tomcat distribution, which would mean no admin and no Jasper (with separate optional Jasper binaries available). JMX can be used directly (using a MX4J connector

Re: [VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

Costin Manolache wrote: Since things may get confusing around here, I would like to have an official vote on my prior proposal. This is the list of included features: Libs: - JMX - JAAS - JNDI - digester ( and beanutils, collections it needs ). - modeler - ant ( used for startup and automation

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Costin Manolache wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: If the vote actually passes, I'd like to have only one minimal Tomcat distribution, which would mean no admin and no Jasper (with separate optional Jasper binaries available). JMX can be used directly (using a MX4J connector + MC4J, assuming MC4J u

Re: [4.1.17] Tag soon ?

Remy Maucherat wrote: Glenn Nielsen wrote: It seeems that we are doing very frequent point releases of Tomcat 4.1.16. Yet haven't had a stable release since 4.1.12. Reviewing the release notes I don't see any difference between CVS HEAD and 4.1.16 except for my recent addition of the DataSour

[VOTE] Minimal tomcat ( JSR154 + JSR152 )

Since things may get confusing around here, I would like to have an official vote on my prior proposal. This is the list of included features: Libs: - JMX - JAAS - JNDI - digester ( and beanutils, collections it needs ). - modeler - ant ( used for startup and automation of some tasks ) - common

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Remy Maucherat wrote: > If the vote actually passes, I'd like to have only one minimal Tomcat > distribution, which would mean no admin and no Jasper (with separate > optional Jasper binaries available). JMX can be used directly (using a > MX4J connector + MC4J, assuming MC4J updates to MX4J 1.1.

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Ignacio J. Ortega wrote: Jon, Create a separate minimal JSR 154 only distribution of Tomcat 4.x: +0, i could be +1 but i'm out of time to offer any help in tomcat as a whole, and of course for this particular proposal, but i dont see anything wrong in it, more i do see it as another step, i

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/valves PersistentValve.java

jfclere 2002/12/09 07:05:55 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina Manager.java catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/session FileStore.java JDBCStore.java PersistentManagerBase.java Removed: catalina/src/shar

RE: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Jon, > Create a separate minimal JSR 154 only distribution of Tomcat 4.x: > +0, i could be +1 but i'm out of time to offer any help in tomcat as a whole, and of course for this particular proposal, but i dont see anything wrong in it, more i do see it as another step, in the GTU Path ( GTU stand

Re: [4.1.17] Tag soon ?

Glenn Nielsen wrote: It seeems that we are doing very frequent point releases of Tomcat 4.1.16. Yet haven't had a stable release since 4.1.12. Reviewing the release notes I don't see any difference between CVS HEAD and 4.1.16 except for my recent addition of the DataSource Realm. Why tag 4.1.17

Re: [4.1] Changes to base interfaces

jean-frederic clere wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, Changing the API in the 4.1.x branch is not ok (at a bare minimum, not without asking/voting). A method addition was made on 11/30 to the org.apache.catalina.Manager interface. This could break compatibility with 3rd party managers, and ap

Re: [4.1.17] Tag soon ?

It seeems that we are doing very frequent point releases of Tomcat 4.1.16. Yet haven't had a stable release since 4.1.12. Reviewing the release notes I don't see any difference between CVS HEAD and 4.1.16 except for my recent addition of the DataSource Realm. Why tag 4.1.17 when there are so few c

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

I have interest in the admin tool - but I don't trust it yet and for my production work - and I am still stuck on the 4.0.X series. I think the admin tool is essential for a full distribution - but useless in a minimal distribution. The user base wanting the min distribution already have the kn

RE: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

As an end user. I don't use the admin tool, don't know what it is. I do use both JSP and Servlets. M -Original Message- From: Glenn Nielsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 09 December 2002 14:06 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution Jeanfranc

Patch for isapi_redirector2

Hi, I have made a patch which solves a problem I had last week--isapi_redirector sometimes corrupted data sent by the client. I'm not sure where to send the patch, I hope I don't abuse this list by submitting it here. Someone more intimate with the code might want to make a better patch, the cod

Re: [VOTE] minimal JSR 154 only distribution

Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote: Jon Scott Stevens wrote: Create a separate minimal JSR 154 only distribution of Tomcat 4.x: +1 [] 0 [] -1 [X] -jon (1) Jasper is very a very small jar file. (2) The Admin Tool should go with the minimal distribution of Tomcat. We decided to includ

Re: [4.1] Changes to base interfaces

Remy Maucherat wrote: Hi, Changing the API in the 4.1.x branch is not ok (at a bare minimum, not without asking/voting). A method addition was made on 11/30 to the org.apache.catalina.Manager interface. This could break compatibility with 3rd party managers, and apparently was made during an o

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native CHANGES.txt

hgomez 2002/12/09 05:28:55 Modified:jk/native CHANGES.txt Log: comment changes Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +10 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/CHANGES.txt Index: CHANGES.txt === RCS fi

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2 CHANGES.txt

hgomez 2002/12/09 05:27:20 Modified:jk/native2 CHANGES.txt Log: comment change Revision ChangesPath 1.7 +5 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/CHANGES.txt Index: CHANGES.txt === RCS f

[GUMP] Build Failure - jakarta-tomcat-catalina

This email is autogenerated from the output from: Buildfile: build.xml deploy-prepare: [mkdir] Created dir: /ho

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache2 jk_service_apache2.c

hgomez 2002/12/09 05:23:20 Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 jk_service_apache2.c Log: Make jk2 works with filters in Apache 2.0, ie mod_deflate and AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/html. Revision ChangesPath 1.33 +5 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/nat

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/resources/confinstall server_2.xml

remm2002/12/09 05:22:55 Modified:resources/confinstall server_2.xml Log: - Port connector configuration tweaks. Revision ChangesPath 1.6 +6 -6 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/resources/confinstall/server_2.xml Index: server_2.xml =

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/apache-2.0 mod_webapp.c

hgomez 2002/12/09 05:22:45 Modified:webapp/apache-2.0 mod_webapp.c Log: Make webapp works with filters in Apache 2.0, ie mod_deflate and AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/html. NB: My first webapp commit ;-) Revision ChangesPath 1.12 +7 -2

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/conf server.xml

remm2002/12/09 05:22:40 Modified:catalina/src/conf server.xml Log: - Port connector configuration tweaks. Revision ChangesPath 1.67 +7 -6 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/conf/server.xml Index: server.xml ===

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c

hgomez 2002/12/09 05:19:18 Modified:jk/native/apache-2.0 mod_jk.c Log: Make jk works with filters in Apache 2.0, ie mod_deflate and AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/html. Revision ChangesPath 1.62 +5 -2 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-2.0/

adding content-type for Apache 2.0 jk/jk2

Hi, I'm playing currently with mod_jk + mod_deflate on Apache 2.0, and it seems it will be needed to set the content-type in response in Apache 2.0 to allow mod_deflate to compress only text/html, text/xml contents. It seems in that case will need to parse the tomcat response to set content-type

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15176] New: - oracle.xml.sql.OracleXMLSQLException: java.lang.ClassCastException

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[4.1] Changes to base interfaces

Hi, Changing the API in the 4.1.x branch is not ok (at a bare minimum, not without asking/voting). A method addition was made on 11/30 to the org.apache.catalina.Manager interface. This could break compatibility with 3rd party managers, and apparently was made during an optimization effort, as

[4.1.17] Tag soon ?

I don't see any major issues with 4.1.16, so I plan to tag 4.1.17 (which hopefully would be the next stable build) tomorrow after a few more minor tweaks. There was a report made against JK 2 immediately after 4.1.16 Beta was announced. Can someone confirm there's no major issue with JK ? Remy

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-5 build.properties.default

remm2002/12/09 03:16:30 Modified:.build.properties.default Log: - Update to NSIS Beta 0. Hopefully, no more API changes from now on. Revision ChangesPath 1.54 +2 -2 jakarta-tomcat-5/build.properties.default Index: build.properties.default

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15175] - Tomcat stops responding on solaris 8

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15175] New: - Tomcat stops responding on solaris 8

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

  1   2   >