Hi Jon,
First, I want to thank you for the advices and your
mail - even if I don't like what you say I do believe
that your mail have some good things for me.
It really scares me that you are the only person (as
far as I can tell) that is seriously interested in
? maintaining and developing
Bug report #608 has just been filed.
You can view the report at the following URL:
http://znutar.cortexity.com/BugRatViewer/ShowReport/608
REPORT #608 Details.
Project: Tomcat
Category: Bug Report
SubCategory: New Bug Report
Class: swbug
State: received
Priority: medium
Severity:
Hi everybody,
i posted a few times earlier ...
but now i hope that found the source of the error (till yet without
solution).
I am using a servlet which calls itself from the get to the post method.
A user is identified via sesion (quite usual i think)
When using tomcat via 8080 port
Excuse for my determination but my problem was not solve...
After change my serveur.xml to clientAuth=true like Craig R. McClanahan said,
I fall again on my first exception when I try to extract the certificate request because
object associate with ùrequest attributes nameés
Bug report #610 has just been filed.
You can view the report at the following URL:
http://znutar.cortexity.com/BugRatViewer/ShowReport/610
REPORT #610 Details.
Project: Tomcat
Category: Bug Report
SubCategory: New Bug Report
Class: swbug
State: received
Priority: high
Severity: critical
I definitely agree with Henry Costin...
Saludos ,
Ignacio J. Ortega
cga wrote:
Hi there,
I was thinking "There is a way to speed up jps". I mean if I take out
white spaces and other unnecesary text out of the html part of a jsp, the
server will send less bytes to the browser so it will be faster.
I am pretending to do a Reader that takes out
tomcat-dev,hi!
I have the tomcat is version 3.1 with own webserver,with the request 'rise,we
can find the socket error and stop automic when want to restart tomcat,it can not
restart,we should restart the computer and then we can start the tomcat again.I hear
that should modify the
Hi,
sorry for my mail into this group, but the user group seems to be dead
since the 19th of November and we got an urgent SSL problem:
I'm currently stuck with my SSL enabling of tomcat
3.2 with a weird error message.
As soon as I try to access SSL secured content, the
following error
Hi,
Just tested TC 4.0 m5 and mod_warp from my RPMs.
In my httpd.conf :
...
IfDefine SSL
LoadModule ssl_module lib/apache/libssl.so
/IfDefine
LoadModule perl_modulelib/apache/libperl.so
LoadModule dav_module lib/apache/libdav.so
LoadModule webapp_module
Just to continue :
The jsession is written on URL :
http://localhost/examples/servlet/SessionExample;jsessionid=B0B0D1E98495F533
D57255B4F1952436
Hola Shai:
IMHO your patch very interesting, i want use it on my own ( prior to
commit it after a review by people )..
In mean time, please send patches as attached files, not embedded in a
message, and another silly advice, please please dont send messages in
HTML, for the people that have big
Agree.
How do I configure wincvs to give me file with differences.
How do I configure wincvs to do diff -u ? (default is -w) ?
--Shai
-Original Message-
From: Nacho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 16:48
To: 'tomcat-dev'
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Saving sessions
I tried as Jerome Camilleri did and I can say that it doesn't work. I also tried to
use java.security.cert.X509Certificate but it returns a null reference!:(
In fact it's not requesting any certificate from my browser. (I'm using Netscape 4.73
and 6.0).
TIA,
Alexandre.
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000
Hi,
i still have my problem using tomcat 3.2.1 (release) with
apache. Sessions are mixed up when calling the same
servlet but using get/post method (get calls post and
the other way around).
Problem only arises when using tomcat with apache -
not when using tomcat standalone.
Any hints?
Why the attribute 'javax.servlet.request.X509Certificate' return an array of X509Certificate.
I don't understand how it's possible because when my client choose an certificate, he chooses only one...
For my test array contain always one element... so is it an specification to anticipate the
I am using Tomcat as the enterprise servlet container in production for our B2B
E-Commerce servlet and several intranet applications at Joseph E. Seagram
Sons, Inc. I'm using the ISAPI filter and an SSL connection to IIS.
The URL is only for our distributors to use, but you can hit the login
Bug report #613 has just been filed.
You can view the report at the following URL:
http://znutar.cortexity.com/BugRatViewer/ShowReport/613
REPORT #613 Details.
Project: Tomcat
Category: Bug Report
SubCategory: New Bug Report
Class: swbug
State: received
Priority: high
Severity: critical
Hi,
I am able to compile Apache2.0, and I updated mod_jk
for the modified functions in 2.0 - it now compiles.
I'm pretty confident we can have it running in few
days - it did worked before and it works fine with
other multithreaded servers. As you can see, most of
the code in mod_jk is
Not everybody is in a position to throw away their investment in the 3.x
series just yet. While its fun to try the latest and greatest, not
everybody can do that. Craig, is java.sun.com running on Tomcat 4.0?
Jon, is www.apache.org running Apache 2.0 yet? When do you think they
will be ready
* The good point with TC 4.0 are all the good things inside (JMX, JAXP
1.0/1.1)
The bad point on TC 4.0 are all these good things (JMX, JAXP 1.0/1.1).
You have seens the thread on '[PROPOSAL] building is easy'. We need too
many
things now to build TC 4.0.
You need JAXP, JSSE and
Wow. That was fast. I am in the middle of compiling Apache 2.0 on locus
so that we can run it with locus's config file on port 8080. I expect we
will release the alpha on Friday unless something goes wrong, Once I have
Apache running on port 8080 on locus, we can work on getting mod_jk
Works for me. Every mime-type usually lays claim to a default suffix
or two and we should definitely pick one and say that there is an
implicit mapping for that prefix. So if I name my pages jspx then I
don't have to worry about setting any mappings to get a JSP container
to interpret the page
The idea (I think) is to have the certificate chain in there. Your
client certificate is signed by some authority which may, in turn, be
signed by someone else and so on...
So you could get your client certificate as the first element, the one
who signed his certificate as the second and so
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why the attribute 'javax.servlet.request.X509Certificate'
return an array of X509Certificate.
I don't understand how it's possible
because when my client choose an certificate, he chooses only one...
For my test array contain always
one element... so is it an
on 12/18/2000 10:01 AM, "Greg Bailey" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a use of Tomcat 3.1 on several production machines, may I say "thanks" also
to
Costin and everyone else who supports 3.1 (and 3.1.1, 3.2, 3.2.1, etc.) We
are
in no position to jump to 4.0 just because its trendy and has more
Bug report #614 has just been filed.
You can view the report at the following URL:
http://znutar.cortexity.com/BugRatViewer/ShowReport/614
REPORT #614 Details.
Project: Tomcat
Category: Feature Requests
SubCategory: New Feature
Class: swbug
State: received
Priority: low
Severity:
I don't agree. TC3.3 is a rewrite of TC3.2, with all
of the TC4 "fancy features" (and some more).
3.3 is not a "rewrite" of 3.2 - some code was moved
for better organization and modularity, and we
finished a number of optimizations that were started
during 3.2 development.
Yes, a lot of code
I wish people would pay more attention to what the
overall issues are
instead of focusing on entirely the wrong things.
+1 on this
The issue is the idea of a 3.3 and I'm not saying to
"jump" to 4.0.
I don't see how did you created a "3.3" issue -
tomcat3.x development continues as it
on 12/18/2000 11:27 AM, "Costin Manolache" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In fact, 3.3 doesn't even exist - when the development
on the main branch of tomcat 3 will reach a stable
state we can discuss about 3.3 , and you can argue
that it's better or worse than 3.2 and we should ( or
should not )
-Original Message-
From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
on 12/18/2000 10:01 AM, "Greg Bailey" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a use of Tomcat 3.1 on several production machines, may I
say "thanks" also
to
Costin and everyone else who supports 3.1 (and 3.1.1, 3.2,
3.2.1,
David Rees wrote:
Frankly, I am disappointed in the development process of Tomcat. I posted a
simple documentation patch (See bug report 528) two weeks ago for the FAQ
included with the Tomcat 3.x and posted a couple messages about it. I
haven't heard a thing about it and saw the release
Tom Reilly wrote,
So here's my proposal:
JSP 1.2 engines have mime type mappings like so (or something
like this):
*.jsp - application/jsp
*.jspx - application/jsp-xml
And documents of type application/jsp and application/jspx (or
whatever names we decide on) are handled appropriately
Jon ha escrito:
Please look at all the information available to you about
what is happening
before commenting again.
To give people a chance to get a personal opinion let's go to the REAL
start of this thread, a interesting exercise ( at least for me )
on 12/18/2000 11:47 AM, "David Rees" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It really is part of the same issue. Because Greg is not willing to jump to
4.0, the idea of continuing development on the 3.x branch (work towards 3.3)
is welcome and reassuring. There will likely be some issues with porting
Bug report #615 has just been filed.
You can view the report at the following URL:
http://znutar.cortexity.com/BugRatViewer/ShowReport/615
REPORT #615 Details.
Project: Tomcat
Category: Bug Report
SubCategory: New Bug Report
Class: swbug
State: received
Priority: medium
Severity: serious
Hi Craig,
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Frankly, I am disappointed in the development process of
Tomcat. I posted a
simple documentation patch (See bug report 528) two weeks ago
for the FAQ
included with the Tomcat 3.x and posted a
Paul Frieden wrote:
Not everybody is in a position to throw away their investment in the 3.x
series just yet.
Absolutely true. That's why I went back and did 3.2, because I totally understand
this reasoning.
Some people can't even get off 3.1 yet, because Costin changed so much in 3.2
:-).
From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
There are no issues with porting to 4.0. I just took an app
developed on 3.x
and moved it to 4.0 without any problems.
Maybe for your app it ported over, but for others (specifically those
working with XML and parsers other than the one bundled
on 12/18/2000 12:40 PM, "David Rees" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although I might point out that there seems to be at least one full time
paid employee on the project. :-)
-Dave
Costin is not paid to work on this project.
-jon
on 12/18/2000 12:20 AM, "Costin Manolache" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see any need to go beyond 3.3 - and I said
many times I'll stop doing any major changes in the
core after 3.3 is done. I'll just fix bugs and develop
modules - most of them in my private, non-apache space
( I'm
Ok, so the primary developer of 3.x disappears and now I'm the one that gets
stuck answering the tech support emails and can't even give a good answer?
No way am I going to support any decision towards that.
I don't think that very many of you realize the amount of privately send
support email
- Original Message -
From: "Jon Stevens" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
callous rant snipped
I think Jon is going for the record to see how many developers and people of
good conscience he can alienate.
Costin, I appreciate all of the hard work you have done on the Tomcat project.
You were pivotal
on 12/18/2000 1:36 PM, "James Cook" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think Jon is going for the record to see how many developers and people of
good conscience he can alienate.
I thank you for your opinion. I'm sorry if people feel alienated as that
isn't my intention.
Costin, I appreciate all of
Hi Jon,
From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Of course not. That is why I'm suggesting to move away from it for the
future and opening the discussion of that now. Would you rather that we
continue to follow down this path of split trees forever? Would you rather
that all of our
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Henri Gomez wrote:
The users will decide. Be fair, let them evaluate TC 3.3.
Speaking as a user, this doesn't make sense. It's fine to compare
two different products, but it doesn't make any sense to compare two
different versions of the same product that are
on 12/18/2000 1:18 PM, "dferugson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anybody know if tomcat is headed in the direction of being a full ejb
app server?
No, it isn't.
www.ejboss.org is the right thing that you want and has integration with
Tomcat.
-jon
--
Honk if you love peace and quiet.
David Rees wrote:
Hi Craig,
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Frankly, I am disappointed in the development process of
Tomcat. I posted a
simple documentation patch (See bug report 528) two weeks ago
for the FAQ
included with
Henri Gomez wrote:
[snip]
Tomcat 3.x or 4.x? That is the confusion that needs to be cleared up.
The confusion will exist also for Apache 1.3 / 2.0. And this one will be much
more important.
It's actually pretty clear in the web server case. The active development is
happening on 2.0,
Roy Wilson wrote:
It's odd that Nacho suggested that a look at the
thread he posted might
be worthwhile. I've been lurking on this list for about 6 months (with
an
occasional attempt to contribute) and it seems like the TC3.x vs TC4
struggle is like a forest fire that keeps getting almost put
Hello,
(another user here)
If the difference were spoken as tc 3.x follows servlet 2.2/jsp 1.1 where
tc 4.x follows servlet2.3/jsp 1.2, then it's a clear difference that I
can appreciate, and even base decisions on.
I decided to follow 3.2, as I felt that it was getting the most exercise
kenneth topp wrote:
Hello,
(another user here)
If the difference were spoken as tc 3.x follows servlet 2.2/jsp 1.1 where
tc 4.x follows servlet2.3/jsp 1.2, then it's a clear difference that I
can appreciate, and even base decisions on.
For any previous version change in the servlet api
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Jon Stevens wrote:
p.s. One thing that you are all not remembering or even realize is that
Catalina was originally going to be JServ 2.0. If Sun had never given us the
source code to Tomcat, then you would have been using Catalina anyway.
I hope EVERYONE takes what Jon
craigmcc00/12/18 19:23:12
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina Engine.java
catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/startup Embedded.java
Log:
Enhance the example main() method in the Embedded class so that it will
actually run. The "/examples" webapp
+1
Costin Manolache wrote:
Hi again.
Please vote for adding Petr Jiricka ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
to the list of official commiters. He fixed a big number of bugs
in JSP and contributed many ideas in this area - including debugging,
etc.
He has my +1
Costin
( I still use xemacs
I also use FreeBSD and jdk1.2.2 at home (an early version of the hand built port).
It works just fine for Tomcat RD at home, don't know about production.
And I also have heard about GUI problems.
Edward Wolpert wrote:
I've got FBSD at home, and been trying to test the 1.2.2 port myself.
56 matches
Mail list logo
