TO DAVID MILLER:If you wish to understand 'spiritual discernment' then,
read this post by 'the 'G' man'. The majority of his posts warrant serious
consideration.
Have you noticed, David, the coterie of contributors countermanding the
cacophony of 'thin' voices?
I've wondered about the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BLAINE: Even when we are sure of something, it may turn out to be wrong.
Rashly judging something such as the Shroud of Turin to be a fake, or the Book of Mormon,
another example, puts one out on a limb from which it is sometimes difficult to extract
oneself. Called
In a message dated 1/28/2005 5:11:05 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Izzy wrote:
They werent the first to goJudy is gone, too.
John wote:
Not before she did her damage.
John, please do not disparage Judy. This only forces me to respond and
defend my sister.
Defend all you
In a message dated 1/28/2005 5:11:12 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anyone other than me NOT find it strange that Slade 'exited stage left'
without contacting David? DAVID:WHATEVER GOD MAY HAVE GIFTED YOU WITH, HE
DID NOT, I REPEAT not GIFT YOU WITH DISCERNMENT!! This
Just tired of the WAH they hold upWAH our sacredWAH garments WAH
Instead of being a victim tell us why."[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BLAINE: I would not ask for religious help, neither have I asked for such help from sources outside my own beloved stake and ward leaders. Well,
In a message dated 1/28/2005 5:10:56 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm interested in what you and others think about the fall of man being orthodox doctrine or pop theology.
No one on this forum, except you, allows for the doctrine of the "fall of man" to be "pop theology."
It was the Battlestar Galatica that was based on LDS doctrine.
I all goes back to Kobol or is it Kolob?
http://www.michaellorenzen.com/galactica.htmlShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
BLAINE: Even when we are "sure" of something, it may turn out to be wrong.
Debbie:
Better said than my post, I think.
Another way of looking at is this: In the "forrest and the tree" illustration - it is the forest that is "truth" not the tree. the question is not "is this a tree." We CAN figure that out for ourselves with a high degree of certainty. The question is
She didn't need to stand up for the Word of God. In fact, I would characterize her "[stand] ... for the Word" very differently. She stood up for her interpretation of the Word of God. And it was the most unusual set of conclusions as I have seen in years -- nest to yours, of course. I hasten to
In a message dated 1/28/2005 5:10:43 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We have a difference of opinion here. I consider this teaching to be a
doctrine of demons. I do not say this to evoke an emotional outburst from
you or anyone else. I speak this soberly and prophetically.
John wrote None of us stand above
the "forest."
Well said, John. No doubt about it, in this age of
enlightenment that isa difficulttruth to learn.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 6:56
In a message dated 1/28/2005 5:11:20 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, I find it very starnge
If he did leave w/o notice.
Since he accepted the responsibility of moderating.
He should have notified David.
Only takes a second.
That responsibility, in the ultimate
In a message dated 1/29/2005 6:11:20 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John wrote None of us stand above the "forest."
Well said, John. No doubt about it, in this age of enlightenment that is a difficult truth to learn.
Thank you, sir. I am off to work. Got to save my
Do you have any ideee how much material I
have to review before going? Sure glad I have a CD player in my
truck! E h. Smithson -- out !!
Not really. Maybe Lance would have some
suggestions. He has a better idea than myself what the format is going to be.
Hey Lance, any
Bill TaylorFri, 28 Jan 2005
08:56:44 -0800
A hardy AMEN on this one, John. I am
confident that others will read this and agree.
As it pertains to Judy's statement, "[Jesus]wasn't a son before the incarnation and he
hasn't
been thatsince
Hold up Lance!This is Judy now only semi retired :)
I know you are glad to see my return :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:TO DAVID MILLER:If you wish to understand 'spiritual discernment'
then, read this post by 'the 'G' man'. The majority of his posts warrant serious
consideration.
jt: What
Greetings Judy,
Please refer to the portion of your quote which I
underlined: "[Jesus]wasn't a son before the
incarnation and he hasn't been thatsince the resurrection."That is the portion I surmised you may
want to take back if given the grace to do so. I went ahead and emphasized a
'Prep' suggestions:
1. Theological Instinct by TFT (CD)
2. Mediation of Christ by TFT (CD
print)
3. Gospel Mental Health by Bruce
Wauchope (CD)
NB:Well 'John-boy', AE will play a central
part so, come prepared to raise your creative thesis vis a vis
AE.
Terminological 'brushing up'
1.
The rest of the 'triad' may denounce me but I
ACTUALLY AM HAPPY TO BE PRESENT AT YOUR THIRD (?) COMING.
The 'G' man isn't for everyone. I'm a fan while you
may prefer the 'fundy' triad (David, Linda, Judy).
PS-check your definitions for synonymous
meanings.
- Original Message -
Good Morning Bill:
I have no problem with the fact that Jesus will always
be the lamb of God, firstborn from the dead, and the
ONLY begotten Son of the
Father; neither do Idispute that he is ever called the son of the Father
following the resurrection. Possibly I should have
phrased the
I only retired once Lance but reconsidered - How could
Ideprive G of the joy of holding my feet to the fire?
As for being a fan of his, all I can say is - you must
enjoy certain types of poetry. The meanings I posted
come from Websters New World Dictionary; are you sure
you are using them
Coterie-An exclusive group of people with a common
purpose
Cacophony-Discordant or dissonant
sound
The latter applies to the sounds issuing from TT in
recent weeks. Actually 'the david' is capable of cacophony on his own.
(meaning:discord dissonance exist within him).
- Original
I believe that it came out of Scientology, not LDS.
Gregory A. Hession J.D.[EMAIL PROTECTED]Springfield,
Mass.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 8:49
AM
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Shroud
BLAINE: The main difference between the Battlestar Galactica series and the
BoM is that the former admits to be fiction, while the Book of Mormon is a
record of what really happened to a once great people. It tells us that
history may repeat itself, and indeed seems to be doing exactly that,
Hey Ruben, so you are back--I was wondering if maybe you hadn't just taken a
vacation. Looks like you have been oput doin' your thing.
Blaine
click to site below and you will see the video clips of different preach
events, you will be watching the “coast to coast” video tape on my web
Check out the reviews on 'God Against the Gods -
The history of the war between Monotheism and Polytheism''
I believe that I hear echoes of Kirsch in David,
Linda Judy.
BLAINE The point is that when we knock something prematurely, but afterwards
it turns out to be true after all, we often feel compelled to stay with our
earlier condemnation, just for ego's sake. And speaking of faith, I have faith
that the Book of Mormon will eventually prove beyond
I think it could be read along with 'Cat in the Hat' James the Giant
Peach' except these two more accurately reflect reality.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 29, 2005 12:02
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Shroud of Turin older than
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Deegan
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005
7:57 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Street
Preaching
She didn't need to stand up for the
Word of God. In fact, I would characterize her
That would make you a false prophet, in my book. But,
again, what does either opinion have to do with the discussion at
hand. NOTHING. Yet you call this a disscussion
group and nothing more. Why you insist on this kind of childishness
is beyond me.
Id describe it as a room full of
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005
8:49 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Street
Preaching
Hold up Lance!
This is Judy now only semi retired
BLAINE: I understand what you are saying, and sorry I seem to be complaining
too much--but actually, Kevin, I feel you people do yourselves more harm than
good by showing your true colors when you wave the undies around. Maybe I am
crying for your sakes, since it doesn't seem to have harmed
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005
9:35 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Street
Preaching
The rest of the 'triad' may denounce me but I ACTUALLY AM
HAPPY TO BE PRESENT AT
Actually 'the david' is capable of cacophony on his own.
(meaning:discord dissonance exist within him).
Its music to my ears. One mans trash is
another mans treasure. Iz
Maybe Golob in Lord of the Rings???
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gregory A. Hession J.D.
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005
10:28 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Shroud of
Turin older than thought
I believe that
BLAINE:
It tells us that history may repeat itself,
Wowwhat a piece of news. We need the
BoM for that??? Iz
ROFL! Or how about My Lies by
Bill Clinton? Iz
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 11:04 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Shroud of Turin older than thought
I
Sorry, Blaine, but I must take
responsibility for the waving around of mormon undies, as I believe the SPs
would never have know you wear them except for my telling them. (Some secrets
are just too good to keep!) Izzy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
BLAINE: C'mon Lance, those are cute remarks, but I see no comparison, so
would you care to elaborate, or will you be content to make the assertion
without having to go to the laborious process of qualifying it? If the latter,
then I can safely assume you really had nothing specific in mind,
Sadly, no 'keyboards' involved here. I actually did the necessary research.
You may have noticed an earlier reference to a tape (still in my possession)
of a supposed 'revelation' by the then 'prophet'. I've been WAY down this
road! That said, the comparison stands.
If you believe the Mormon
myth (you let JCsit on your
lap and meow)
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 11:12:39 -0600 "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Its all about
silencing dissenting voices.
jt: Might Irespectfully disagree with both
of you?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Does
anyone other than me NOT find it strange that Slade 'exited stage left'
without contacting David?
jt: If he is in fact gone then yes,
I find it strange. There is a right way to do things for
..accommodation, below,is
in the contextualbackdropofJCsorthodoxy..e.g., his
accomodation of Judas (the will of the Father)relates perhaps
abstractlyto the Spirit of his preachinginMatt
23--there'san absolute difference betw'accomodating'ppl
(sinners) and'accomodating'sin, yet apparently
Indeed, you may.
Misplaced? Certainly not. A much better moderater
than David (not caught up in 'fundy' legalisms)
Too much on his plate? Maybe.
Inside knowledge? No. I can 'read'
people.
Up front? He was as up front as you can
get.
Let David 'take his bat and ball' and go home if he
jt: Lance this Jonathan man is a pagan himself so has
no frame of reference by which to judge
what he professes to be the thesis of his book.
How does one evaluate something one is
ignorant about? He obviously does not know God,
nor does he understand what God is about.
What fascinates you
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 13:47:50 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Indeed, you may.
Misplaced? Certainly not. A much better moderater
than David (not caught up in 'fundy' legalisms)
jt: What? With only 613
Midrashes to keep up with and all the feasts. What you say?
Looks like the 'fundies' have invaded the Smithsonian
also ... and the
prevailing liberalism is 'threatened' What is
going on here?
This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article
whichfollows. To view this item online,
What fascinates me? He sounds like you, Linda and,
David.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 29, 2005 14:16
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fundies on TT
find ally in Jonathan
What has David done to 'tweak' me? Nothing. It is
simply who I find him to be on this 'chat' room. Who might that be?
Bragadocious, ostentatious and far too wordy.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc:
Indeed! Intelligent design as an argument is
unintelligent.It's interesting. IT PROVES NOTHING.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: truthtalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 29, 2005 15:10
Subject: [TruthTalk] Smithsonian in
uproar over
jt: Then you obviously have not understood
anything Linda, David, or I have said so far Lance which is not all that
surprising. The one thing all three of
us have in common and do agree on wholeheartedly is the authority of God's Word
whereas I seriously doubt that this man has
read it
jt: He goes the extra mile in trying to make
himself understood - which you apparently interpret as "too wordy"
I don'tsee"ostentatious"
how?
Bragadocious - possibly his proclamation of
God's truth in his own lifewhich you interpret as him bragging on
himself.
Note: How does one chat in a
You left the most important part out
MT 5:16 Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/28/2005 5:11:20 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, I find it very
That explains it, Lance is from CanuckastanJudy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I only retired once Lance but reconsidered - How could Ideprive G of the joy of holding my feet to the fire?
As for being a fan of his, all I can say is - you must enjoy certain types of poetry. The meanings I
Nope it is full of Mormon Doctrine.
Glen Larson (creator and producer of Galactica) is a Mormon
Check the link below for some of the LDS doctrine in the shows.
What Scientology do you see in the show?"Gregory A. Hession J.D." [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe that it came out of Scientology,
In a message dated 1/29/2005 1:13:31 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You left the most important part out
MT 5:16 Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven.
And how do you know I left this out? It
I thought we were going to stop
criticizing people and start discussing issues instead. I guess I was
wrong. BTW, if you knew David M personally you would know that he is
actually confidently unashamed of his beliefs (which infuriates some), quiet,
gentle and humble. Its amazing how wrong
So whats your belief regarding
Creation, Lance?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005
2:21 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Smithsonian in uproar over intelligent-design article FYI
In a message dated 1/29/2005 10:52:56 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A close kin to "discernment" is something called "empathy." JD
jt: I don't think so John. Empathy and fleshly compassion are close kin. Deliverance in the power
of the Holy Spirit is close kin to real
In a message dated 1/29/2005 10:51:24 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
there's an absolute difference betw 'accomodating' ppl (sinners) and 'accomodating' sin,
So many legalist cultists miss this point as to render it profound.
JD
In a message dated 1/29/2005 10:52:56 AM Pacific Standard
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A close kin to discernment is something called
empathy. JD
jt: I don't think so John. Empathy
and fleshly compassion are close kin. Deliverance in the power
of the Holy Spirit is close kin to
I recently examined the finds at the Oriental Institute in Chicago
I viewed a number of artifacts that collaborate the stories of the Assyrianpeople as spoken of in the Holy Bible.
I even saw artifacts that proved the existance of a number of Kings of that nation andof the nation of Israel,who
In a message dated 1/29/2005 9:16:36 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Id describe it as a room full of backbiterscertainly not kind friends. I wouldnt attend a party like this. Izzy
You attend one everyday and have more to say negatively than any one on the forum, if you
BLAINE SAYS afterwards it turns out to be true after all, we often feel compelled to stay with our earlier condemnation, just for ego's sake.
Who is this "we" ?
Speak for yourself."[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BLAINE The point is that when we knock something prematurely, but
BULLseye! Izzy Hit the nail on the head. Exactly my point.
The real exciting part is, Talking about others that have left the forum, it's just my cup O tea!ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin DeeganSent:
So you were ther last year did you personally see any actions that you care to discuss?
My offer to meet with you still stands. I take your non reply to mean NO THANKS. Though I would prefer that you would have enough gumption to say so. Maybe I am presuming and you did not see the previous
d describe it as a room full of backbiterscertainly not
kind friends. I wouldnt attend a party like this. Izzy
You attend one everyday and have more to say negatively than any one on the
forum, if you consider ratio analysis comparing number of words written to
number of negatives
In a message dated 1/29/2005 1:59:57 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It seems to me that the real test of human empathy is what we actually DO for those less fortunate than us. (vs the talk we talk.) God will be the judge of that, and not one of us on TT. Izzy
This is your
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 16:51:30 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A close kin to "discernment" is something
called "empathy." JD jt: I don't
think so John. Empathy and fleshly compassion are close kin.
Deliverance in the power of the Holy Spirit is close kin to real spiritual discernment
Lance Muir wrote:
What has David done to 'tweak' me?
Nothing. It is simply who I find him to be on this 'chat' room. Who
might that be? Bragadocious, ostentatious and far too wordy.
===
You might want to reexamine your findings.
JD And how do you know I left this out?
In a message dated 1/28/2005 5:11:20 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Yes, I find it very starnge If he did leave w/o notice.Since he accepted the responsibility of moderating.He should have notified David.Only takes a second.YOU STOPPED
In a message dated 1/29/2005 1:59:57 PM Pacific Standard
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It seems to me that the
real test of human empathy is what we actually DO for those less fortunate than
us. (vs the talk we talk.) God will be the judge of that, and not
one of us on TT. Izzy
This is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is your problem = "it seems to me that ..."
Empathy has much more to do with somehow knowing of the feelings of
despair, hopelessness and discouragement in the lives of some; "what
we actually do" is something called BENEVOLENCE.
Blaine: Anyone want to buy a book?
The Book of Mormon: Another Testament of Jesus Christ (Official Edition) by
Joseph Smith (Translator)
Edition: Paperback
Price: $4.99
The book speaks for itself., August 2, 2003
There have been over 440,000 copies sold through amazon.com. The Book
No it is more than that you have an opinion it goes all the way to you resist others opinions
Not that that is Bad
When the opion stinks I say RESIST it!ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/29/2005 1:59:57 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It seems
Subject: [TruthTalk] Book of Mormon one of top ten
Blaine:
Anyone want to buy a book?
The Book of Mormon: Another Testament of Jesus Christ (Official
Edition) by Joseph Smith (Translator)
Edition: Paperback
Price: $4.99
The book speaks for itself., August 2, 2003
There
Right, Kevin. More of that
suppression of dissention by belittling the dissenter. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Deegan
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005
4:53 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Street
Preaching
Subject: [TruthTalk] Book of Mormon one of top ten
Blaine: Anyone want to buy a book?
The Book of Mormon: Another Testament of Jesus Christ (Official Edition) by
Joseph Smith (Translator)
Edition: Paperback
Price: $4.99
The book speaks for itself., August 2, 2003
Blaine: Anyone want to buy a book?
"The Book of Mormon claims to be a divinely inspired record. . . . This book must be either true or false. . . . If false, it is one of the most cunning, wicked, bold, deep-laid impositions ever planned upon the world, calculated to deceive and ruin millions
BLAINE: Oh yas, the usual stuff!! We have all been through this before. It
always gets dragged out sooner or later in a last-ditch effort to discredit the
book that is obviously of God, regardless of technicalities you point out. You
should believe the verse you quoted, as it applies to
In a message dated 1/29/2005 3:09:47 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Right, Kevin. More of that suppression of dissention by belittling the dissenter. Izzy
One.
Blaine, please tell us what evangelical approach would work best with
Mormons, especially at the General Conference. Help us out here.
Thanks,
Perry
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Stirring
In a message dated 1/29/2005 3:06:59 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Subject: [TruthTalk] Book of Mormon one of top ten
Blaine: Anyone want to buy a book?
The Book of Mormon: Another Testament of Jesus Christ (Official Edition) by Joseph Smith (Translator)
In a message dated 1/29/2005 2:48:30 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is your problem = "it seems to me that ..."
Empathy has much more to do with somehow knowing of the feelings of despair, hopelessness and discouragement in the lives of some; "what we actually do"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/29/2005 2:48:30 PM
Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is your problem = "it seems to me that ..."
Empathy has much more to do with somehow knowing of the feelings of
despair, hopelessness and discouragement
In a message dated 1/29/2005 2:45:37 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It seems to me that the real test of human empathy is what we actually DO for those less fortunate than us. (vs the talk we talk.) God will be the judge of that, and not one of us on TT. Izzy
This is your
In a message dated 1/29/2005 2:39:31 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JD And how do you know I left this out?
In a message dated 1/28/2005 5:11:20 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, I find it very starnge
If he did leave w/o notice.
Since he
In a message dated 1/29/2005 2:28:56 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A close kin to "discernment" is something called "empathy." JD
jt: I don't think so John. Empathy and fleshly compassion are close kin. Deliverance in the power
of the Holy Spirit is close kin to real
BLAINE: C'mon Lance, those are "cute" remarks, but I see no comparison,so would you care to elaborate, or will you be content to make the assertion without having to go to the laborious process of qualifying it?
ABSURD to say the least
No wonder they say it is a fable for Adults
In a message dated 1/29/2005 4:52:39 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Blaine, please tell us what evangelical approach would work best with
Mormons, especially at the General Conference. Help us out here.
Thanks,
Perry
: )
Will Blaine venture an answer? It is my
In a message dated 1/29/2005 7:31:43 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
'Prep' suggestions:
1. Theological Instinct by TFT (CD)
2. Mediation of Christ by TFT (CD print)
3. Gospel Mental Health by Bruce Wauchope (CD)
NB:Well 'John-boy', AE will play a central part so, come
BLAINE There are many reasons, I suppose, why one may choose not to believe--desire to believe is the "grain of mustard seed" that enables one to have faith that will move mountains of doubt.You need to cultivate this desire, and let it grow.
You have mountains of doubt because the object you
It was a laborious process, and one likely to engender some errors
They are not Technicalities your eternal destiny rests here.
We are talking MANY not some errors.
The Bible is without error , not "as translated correctly"
The BoM was translated by the GIFT POWER of God
Was he a pipsqueak that
Good question!Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Blaine, please tell us what evangelical approach would work best with Mormons, especially at the General Conference. Help us out here.Thanks,PerryFrom: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgTo:
In a message dated 1/28/2005 12:18:27 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As far as John goes, if he wants to question the orthodoxy of the fall, I say let him do so. Who is Adam but the old man? When Christ died, we died with him -- and the old man died, too. The debt of the
Right, Kevin. More
of that suppression of dissention by belittling the dissenter.
Izzy
One.
J
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005
7:08 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Street
Preaching
In a message dated 1/29/2005 2:45:37 PM Pacific Standard
Time, [EMAIL
And this from the crowd that gets upset because some are sure they have the TruthShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right, Kevin. More of that suppression of dissention by belittling the dissenter. Izzy
One.
J
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'
Although I share this belief (which we've talked about before), I did not
recognize it as the main point of your post, despite its being underlined and
appearing in the first paragraph! Thanks.
Debbie
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent:
BTW, a
neat thing happened today. I went out to lunch with two people I don't often
see, and when we asked for our bill, the server said, "Someone else has already
paid it." Then he showed us our bill, on the back of whichanother patron
hadwritten, "Have a really fine day! The Great David
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
