Right now when I initiate follows, the easiest way to determine if the user
is already following the individual I'm trying to follow is to just send a
follow request, and get an error back if the user is already following the
individual. However, I'm seeing an issue that might not make this the
Freakin' awesome. Nice job guys!
Jesse
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Mark McBride mmcbr...@twitter.com wrote:
Site Streams, a new feature on the Streaming API, is now available for
beta testing. Site Streams allows services, such as web sites or
mobile push services, to receive real-time
Right now it's taking forever to get through an entire followers list of
someone with over 50,000 followers. It used to be much faster. Did I miss
an announcement somewhere about API issues or response times?
Thanks,
Jesse
, increased error
rates, and other symptoms of our current system state.
Taylor
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Jesse Stay jesses...@gmail.com wrote:
Right now it's taking forever to get through an entire followers list of
someone with over 50,000 followers. It used to be much faster. Did I miss
I saw Raffi Tweet something at one time showing off the ability to display a
user's avatar just by knowing their screen name. Is this documented
somewhere?
Thanks,
Jesse
--
Subscription settings:
http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk/subscribe?hl=en
contributed into it by now)
Earlybird. It's up on the Git Hubs.
-John Kalucki
http://twitter.com/jkalucki
Infrastructure, Twitter Inc.
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Jesse Stay jesses...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone have any code examples of a working integration of User Streams.
When I tail
Anyone have any code examples of a working integration of User Streams.
When I tail the user.js, I get a constant stream of data for my user. I
know I'm not getting that many follows. Curious if I'm querying it the
right way. I'd love to see some examples.
Jesse
--
To unsubscribe, reply
I'm playing with Hovercards and callbacks within hovercards, but the
callback seems to be called before the hovercard is rendered. Is there a
good way to manipulate the content of a hovercard after it is rendered? How
can I interrupt the event that renders the hovercard (or know after it has
I think it's great that Twitter is finally being more transparent about all
this. I could argue they need to be more transparent (where do they plan to
go in the analytics and enterprise spaces?), but it's about time. They've
finally drawn the line in the sand - now we need to adapt. Yes, it's
just spent a year building a tweetie
competitor.
you can't fault a guy for saying ouch while your knife is still sticking
out of his back, right?
isaiah
http://twitter.com/isaiah
On Apr 12, 2010, at 9:10 AM, Jesse Stay wrote:
I think it's great that Twitter is finally being more
Eric, I disagree. This just means they've put us on notice that if our apps
completely revolve around Twitter we risk going into competition with them.
I don't think there's anything wrong with that, although it is frustrating,
I agree (this is nothing new - they've been doing this for the last
What? They're not the same person? All this time... ;-) Yes, I meant
Wilson.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Andrew Badera and...@badera.us wrote:
Fred Thompson? What's Law Order got to do with anything?
(Wilson?)
--ab
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Jesse Stay jesses
In support of what Raffi is saying, I think too many apps are supports for
Twitter (some call it filling holes). I think the more beneficial, and
long-term advantageous approach is instead to make Twitter a support for
your application. I hope this isn't seen as spam, but I wrote about this
last
I love this idea! I'm @Jesse. I run SocialToo.com. I also wrote 2 books
for Facebook: I'm on Facebook--Now What??? and FBML Essentials. I sold my
first Facebook app in just 6 weeks after writing it for a small sum, which
allowed me to go out on my own and start my own business. I blog at
I'm trying to access my app page here:
http://twitter.com/oauth_clients/details/61
and I keep getting the over capacity fail whale message. In addition, when
I pass my request_token, verifier, etc. to the access_token method (
(or was it Raffi?) said they were fixing it last year, but I
guess it's pretty low on the priority list.
Tim.
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Jesse Stay jesses...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to access my app page here:
http://twitter.com/oauth_clients/details/61
and I keep getting the over capacity
Why doesn't Twitter just open up their API and patent and then the Twitter
API becomes the standard? We all change less code that way. :-) I like
all these open standards, but it would be so much easier if we could just
use the existing APIs as standards that we've already integrated into all
?
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Jesse Stay jesses...@gmail.com wrote:
Why doesn't Twitter just open up their API and patent and then the Twitter
API becomes the standard? We all change less code that way. :-) I like
all these open standards, but it would be so much easier if we could just
use
I second this, but you know that already :-)
Jesse
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Julien julien.genest...@gmail.com wrote:
Ola!
I know this s some kind of recurring topic for this mailing list. I
know all the heat around it, but I think that Twitter's new strategy
concerning their
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 2:40 AM, Brian Smith br...@briansmith.org wrote:
yegle wrote:
Basically, a API proxy script works as a middleman between twitter and
twitter client, little like man-in-the-middle attack.It's possible to
do this if the authentication is made in HTTP basic auth.But
Pedro, where did I say it wasn't private?
Jesse
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Pedro Junior v.ju.ni.o...@gmail.com wrote:
*No way. DM is private.
*
-
Pedro Junior
2010/2/8 Jesse Stay jesses...@gmail.com
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 6:09 PM, John Meyer john.l.me...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/8
belongs to the logged in
user (is in the user's inbox or sent items)?
On Feb 9, 12:11 am, Jesse Stay jesses...@gmail.com wrote:
Michael, if I want to show the DM the user received in my app, and take
that
user back to Twitter to view that DM there I should be able to, ideally
letting me respond
So am I understanding this correctly that this means TwitPic won't have to
ask for the user's Twitter username and Password any more and will instead
be able to use OAuth and still provide an API to their users? I'm trying to
figure out if this is encouraging the use of the username and password
I'm trying to find a format that allows me to link directly to individual
DMs on Twitter - is this possible? Googling isn't finding anything.
Jesse
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 6:09 PM, John Meyer john.l.me...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/8/2010 5:26 PM, Jesse Stay wrote:
I'm trying to find a format that allows me to link directly to
individual DMs on Twitter - is this possible? Googling isn't finding
anything.
Jesse
http
to look at or isolate one individual DM.
On Feb 8, 8:26 pm, Jesse Stay jesses...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to find a format that allows me to link directly to individual
DMs on Twitter - is this possible? Googling isn't finding anything.
Jesse
Except that the largest culprit of these (not going to name names) doesn't
use OAuth.
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Kevin Marshall falico...@gmail.com wrote:
Also check what apps you've granted access to:
https://twitter.com/account/connections
and remove any that you no longer want to
I think the OWF agreement is an excellent idea - I'd love to see Twitter
join in that agreement with its developers. If Twitter has concerns with it
I'd love to see them get involved in the OWF discussions and perhaps the
agreement could be modified to meet Twitter's needs. Why reinvent the
Same here.
Jesse
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 11:57 PM, DustyReagan dustyrea...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed an issue tonight where a user's Friends, Followers, and
Lists counts randomly goes down to zero. For example, I can refresh
http://twitter.com/TastyTracy a few times and her Friends,
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Abraham Williams 4bra...@gmail.comwrote:
From the numbers I've seen in this thread more then 95% of accounts are are
followed less then 25k times. It would not seem to make sense for Twitter to
support returning more then 25k ids per call. Especially since
If I can suggest you keep it backwards-compatible that would make much more
sense. I think we're all aware that over 200,000 or so followers it breaks.
So what if you kept the cursor-less nature, treat it like a cursor, but set
the returned cursor cap to be 200,000 per cursor? Or if it needs to
I'm just now noticing this (I agree - why was this being announced over the
holidays???) - this will make it near impossible to process large users.
This is a *huge* change that just about kills any of the larger services
processing very large amounts of social graph data. Please reconsider
Ditto PJB :-)
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 8:12 PM, PJB pjbmancun...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that's like asking someone: why do you eat food? But don't say
because it tastes good or nourishes you, because we already know
that! ;)
You guys presumably set the 5000 ids per cursor limit by
Also, how do we get a business relationship set up? I've been asking for
that for years now.
Jesse
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Jesse Stay jesses...@gmail.com wrote:
John, how are things going on the real-time social graph APIs? That would
solve a lot of things for me surrounding
Again, ditto PJB - just making sure the Twitter devs don't think PJB is
alone in this. I'm sure Dewald and many other developers, including those
unaware of this (is it even on the status blog?) agree. I'm also seeing
similar results to PJB in my benchmarks. cursor-less is much, much faster.
At
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Raffi Krikorian ra...@twitter.com wrote:
go code something interesting, and we will be here to support you. (of
course, if we missed something, as we are arguing about in the RT case, we
will work with you all to get it to be what the community needs).
So
For any of you using Perl and Catalyst, I've created a Module enabling you
to handle Twitter OAuth credentials seamlessly in the native Catalyst
authentication process. After installing this module, authenticating the
user is as simple as running $realm-credential-authenticate_twitter_url($c)
to
no affect if you have ported to Cursors.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Naveen Ayyagari knig...@gmail.com
wrote:
I agree, friday is a poor time to make planned changes to the API...
On Nov 13, 2009, at 11:58 PM, Jesse Stay wrote:
I've already implemented this, but for future
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Jesse Stay jesses...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think Twitter has versions right now - you should look at what the
Net::Twitter libraries for Perl are doing though. With those, you tell it
which components of the library you want to include when you're
I have a service that automatically deletes DMs that match certain keywords
on behalf of users. This has been particularly beneficial in the wake of
the recent worms going around. Our users get a couple when the worms start
propagating, but after that, they're protected because of some of the
.
-Chad
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Jesse Stay jesses...@gmail.com
jesses...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a project in which it would be tremendously easier if I could just
specify a search to take place amongst a particular user's Twitter friends,
instead of across the entire site
Maybe a little more appropriate to post this to a private list (no pun
intended) for beta users? I admit I feel a little jealous every time I see
one of these updates, unless there's some way to get into the beta.
Thanks,
Jesse
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Marcel Molina mar...@twitter.com
I have a project in which it would be tremendously easier if I could just
specify a search to take place amongst a particular user's Twitter friends,
instead of across the entire site. Is there a way to do this currently? If
not, is this something the team could consider? I can make it work by
Thanks Chad!
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Chad Etzel c...@twitter.com wrote:
This is something that we're considering internally. I'll bring it up
again, though.
-Chad
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Jesse Stay jesses...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a project in which it would
∞ +1 518-641-1280
∞ This email is: [ ] bloggable [x] ask first [ ] private
∞ Google me: http://www.google.com/search?q=andrew%20badera
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Jesse Stay jesses...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a whitelisted account on a whitelisted IP so I don't see how it
could
you tried tracerouting to Twitter
and see if you hit any roadblocks on the way?
On Oct 24, 2009, at 10:02 PM, Jesse Stay jesses...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a whitelisted account on a whitelisted IP so I don't see how it
could be a rate-limit. It's using basic auth - is there an easy way
Well I think I've fixed it. Not sure what the problem was, but restarting a
few things on the server made the errors go away. Very odd. We'll see if
it comes back.
Jesse
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 1:48 AM, Jesse Stay jesses...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sending from Slicehost. Not seeing any
Oh good - it's not just me then. It happened a few more times today.
Jesse
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Dossy Shiobara do...@panoptic.com wrote:
On 10/25/09 12:16 AM, Jesse Stay wrote:
I'm seeing constant Connection Reset by Peer errors on one of my
servers. Is anyone else seeing
How do I get on the List beta? I'd really like to use it. Who do I pay and
how much?
Jesse
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Marc Mims marc.m...@gmail.com wrote:
I uploaded a development release of Net::Twitter to CPAN with Lists API
support. If you're a perl developer and you're on the
I'm seeing constant Connection Reset by Peer errors on one of my servers.
Is anyone else seeing this? Have I hit a limit of some sort? It's been
happening all day long it seems.
Jesse
days back and reason
was rate limit.
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Jesse Stay jesses...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm seeing constant Connection Reset by Peer errors on one of my servers.
Is anyone else seeing this? Have I hit a limit of some sort? It's been
happening all day long it seems
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 1:39 AM, PJB pjbmancun...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 21, 11:28 pm, Nigel Cannings nigelcanni...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hope that is a better explanation, and might I say on behalf of all
the Perl hackers on the list, keep the good work up!
Hear hear! Net::Twitter
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Chad Etzel jazzyc...@gmail.com wrote:
Twitter already has something similar (one-click login):
http://apiwiki.twitter.com/Sign-in-with-Twitter
Some devs like this for the simplicity, some don't because it will
automatically use the already logged in account
I think in the end any solution, to be the ideal solution, will need
multiple Auth access points for desktop vs. web. OAuth itself also isn't an
ideal desktop solution due to its reliance on the web. My suggestion
towards a Facebook-like solution was intended to be for web apps. It's a
great
I said the same thing in the last thread about this - still no clue what
Twitter is doing with cursors and how it is any different than the previous
paging methods.
Jesse
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Dewald Pretorius dpr...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks John. However, I will be the first to put
KC, I understand for your own app, but why would you want to log the user
out of other apps or Twitter itself? That seems like a security issue to me
if it were possible. Each app should have its own control and
responsibility over when it logs the user out. Maybe I'm missing something?
Jesse
:45 am, Jesse Stay jesses...@gmail.com wrote:
John, because no offense, but frankly I don't trust the Twitter API. I've
been burned too many times by things that were supposed to work, code
pushed into production that wasn't tested properly, etc. that I know
better
to do all I can
I noticed that the friends and followers methods aren't on the docs any
more here:
http://apiwiki.twitter.com/Twitter-API-Documentation
Did I miss the memo that these were being deprecated? Why aren't they in the
docs?
Thanks,
Jesse
I was wondering if it might be possible to include, at least in the first
page, but if it's easier it could be on all pages, either a total expected
number of followers/friends, or a total expected number of returned pages
when the cursor parameter is provided for friends/ids and followers/ids?
Ah - okay. I was looking in the wrong spot. Haven't looked those up in
awhile.
Jesse
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Rich rhyl...@gmail.com wrote:
statuses/friends and statuses/followers are there for me
On Oct 4, 9:10 am, Jesse Stay jesses...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed that the friends
, Twitter Inc.
On Oct 4, 1:29 am, Jesse Stay jesses...@gmail.com wrote:
I was wondering if it might be possible to include, at least in the first
page, but if it's easier it could be on all pages, either a total
expected
number of followers/friends, or a total expected number of returned
friends_count293/friends_count
however - you have to do an additional API call if you don't trust the
pagewise calls
Jesse Stay schrieb:
Thomas, I don't see where it gives you the expected number of users.
Originally I thought Alex said that was going to be part of it, but not
seeing
My site, SocialToo.com will do this for you - we provide filters and such to
keep out auto-dms as well. If you'd like to offer it to your users let me
know and we can work something out that works out seamlessly for you.
Also, yesterday we just launched an anti-virus/anti-worm solution that,
I don't think it sounded hostile, and it sounded to me like he was proposing
it be part of the API, which I agree. That would be pretty useful
information, especially in a constantly changing environment.
Jesse
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Adam Cloud cloudy...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a
Well done, Alex and team - thanks for getting this out so quick. This will
solve many headaches!
Jesse
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Alex Payne a...@twitter.com wrote:
Just wanted to follow up on this thread. We've pushed out a change and
associated documentation that should allow for
Ryan, that makes total sense. The TOS is a bit unclear in that matter.
Jesse
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Ryan Sarver rsar...@twitter.com wrote:
Hey Jesse, thanks for the question.
The intention here is to stop applications that are posting on the
user's behalf without an explicit
This is great news! Regarding sending Tweets on a user's behalf, does
that refer to DMs as well, and when seeking permission, must it be on a
tweet-by-tweet basis, or can a user give you permission beforehand to have
complete control over Tweeting on their behalf? I'd like to see that part
are heading with this. ;-)
If a user explicitly activates a feature in an app that sends DMs on
their behalf, they at that point explicitly grants the app permission
to do so.
Dewald
On Sep 10, 10:10 pm, Jesse Stay jesses...@gmail.com wrote:
This is great news! Regarding sending Tweets
Not necessarily. See this document (which I've posted earlier on this list)
for details: http://code.google.com/p/pubsubhubbub/wiki/PublisherEfficiency
In essence, with PSHB (Pubsub Hubbub), Twitter would only have to retrieve
the latest data, add it to flat files on the server or a single column
Thanks John. I appreciate the various ways of accessing this data, but when
you guys make updates to any of these, can you either do it in a beta
environment we can test in first, or earlier in the week? Where there are
very few Twitter engineers monitoring these lists during the weekends, and
I don't understand how asking to release features earlier in the week is
asking a lot? What does that have to do with scaling social graphs?
Jesse
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Nick Arnett nick.arn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Jesse Stay jesses...@gmail.com wrote
Agreed. Is there a chance Twitter can return the full results in compressed
(gzip or similar) format to reduce load, leaving the burden of decompressing
on our end and reducing bandwidth? I'm sure there are other areas this
could apply as well. I think you'll find compressing the full social
.
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Jesse Stay jesses...@gmail.com wrote:
Agreed. Is there a chance Twitter can return the full results in compressed
(gzip or similar) format to reduce load, leaving the burden of decompressing
on our end and reducing bandwidth? I'm sure there are other areas
As far as retrieving the large graphs from a DB, flat files are one way -
another is to just store the full graph (of ids) in a single column in the
database and parse on retrieval. This is what FriendFeed is doing
currently, so they've said. Dewald and I are both talking about this
because
John, thanks for spending time on this. Any chance we can get a lift on the
follow limits for a temporary time so I can catch up a few users that were
affected by this? Or, if you want to do it on a per-user basis I can send
you the names of the users.
Jesse
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 7:55 AM,
Again, I can't stress this enough - when bugs like this are introduced, it
is imperative that follow limits are also removed temporarily (or on a
case-by-case basis) so we can make this up to our users. I've already had
to issue refunds to a couple due to this. If you need me to send you the
I find if you take it as the rule and not the exception it's much easier to
plan. Seems that way lately with Twitter. :-)
FWIW, I know you hate hearing this, but Facebook's API pushes changes into a
beta staging environment every Tuesday, notifies developers of the changes
as they update it, and
mass unfollow. I do
have the unfollow those who unfollow me feature, but I have limited
it to a maximum of 10 unfollows every 8 hours, even if the API said
that more people have unfollowed the user. That safety valve has
seriously saved my butt this time.
Dewald
On Sep 5, 3:06 pm, Jesse
I've disabled all our following scripts until we hear back from Twitter on
this. Can I pay to get a 24/7 support number I can call for stuff like this?
Jesse
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 1:38 PM, PJB pjbmancun...@gmail.com wrote:
The fix to last nights 5000 limit to friends/ids, followers/ids now
Can Twitter remove the following per hour limit for a little bit after they
fix this (at least for whitelisted IPs and/or OAuth)? This has caused us,
and I'm sure many other apps to pre-emptively unfollow people that they were
not supposed to. This is a BIG problem!
I completely agree with
I have an app I'm sending Twitter updates via both my website, and a
Facebook app. It's the same user database and same brand all around though.
What would be very useful is if there was a way to, when users post from
the Facebook app, mention a specific source for the Facebook app version of
my
Here's the use-case we should be considering for this, and I think it's
valid and I'd love to see Twitter allow this:
With the ability to identify matching Twitter users by e-mail, you can now
suggest to your users people in their friends list on your own website that
have Twitter accounts and
This is my biggest issue right now - I would prefer Twitter launch this
before the new API additions announced today (although I appreciate the
notice!). I can't control it because I can never tell if it's my app
causing the rate limit issues or other apps the user is running causing the
problem.
Alex, you are my person of the day - thank you so much for fixing this!
Jesse
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Alex Payne a...@twitter.com wrote:
A day late and a bug short...
- FIXED: /account/verify_credentials no longer enforces a rate limit
that's inconsistent with the rest of the
I just started getting timeouts again. (the verify_credentials issue I
mentioned before never got fixed either)
Jesse
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Vignesh vignesh.isqu...@gmail.com wrote:
25% of my requests are still getting timed out..is there any rate
limit in place?
On Aug 9, 9:11
Sorry (it's early and I'm tired), not timeouts - it's only allowing 150
requests per hour again.
Jesse
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Jesse Stay jesses...@gmail.com wrote:
I just started getting timeouts again. (the verify_credentials issue I
mentioned before never got fixed either)
Jesse
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 2:23 AM, John Kalucki jkalu...@gmail.com wrote:
There also may be some interesting scaling issues with a Request-
Response push mechanism that are avoided with a streaming approach.
We'd need quite a farm of threads to have sufficient outbound
throughput against the RTT
great ways of doing this, so why re-invent the wheel when you
could be contributing to a great cause that already exists?
Jesse
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Nick Arnett nick.arn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Jesse Stay jesses...@gmail.com wrote:
I know Twitter has
I got thinking about the whole DDoS situation, and while I certainly have my
own opinions around all of this, there's nothing I can do about it. What I
can do though is figure out ways I can improve the systems I'm working in.
The place I think this starts is in our own Twitter libraries we work
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Ed Anuff ed.an...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 9, 10:46 am, Bill Kocik bko...@gmail.com wrote:
All that said, I agree with the spirit of your post. It would be good
if our Twitter API-wrapping libraries were able to handle all of this
in stride (or at least the
Are there any new limits with verify_credentials() now? I'm showing it only
works half the time, even under the 15 requests per hour limit. Anyone else
seeing this?
Jesse
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Ryan Sarver rsar...@twitter.com wrote:
*Finally* have what we hope is good news for
Perhaps someone should set up a wiki page for this with basic info we can
all collaborate on so we can know how to adapt to the new changes in our own
language. I'm sure that's something we can all work together on. Does
Twitter want to take the initiative to at least just start this so we can
I know Twitter has bigger priorities, so if you can put this on your to
think about list for after the DDoS problems are taken care of, I'd
appreciate it. Perhaps this question is for John since it has to do with
real-time. Anyway, is there any plan to support the PubSubHubbub protocol
with
I'm getting timeouts in Safari when going through the OAuth process and
clicking the sign out of Twitter link. Is this related to the DDoS?
Jesse
/authorize?
Thanks
-Bob
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Chris Babcockcbabc...@kolonelpanic.org
wrote:
On Aug 5, 10:15 pm, Jesse Stay jesses...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:04 AM, Chris Babcock
cbabc...@kolonelpanic.comwrote:
I would strongly recommend OAuth
Chad, did that change recently? I was told by Alex and others there that it
was 20,000 calls per hour, period, per IP. When did that change and why
weren't we notified? This will save me a lot of money if it is indeed true.
Jesse
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Chad Etzel c...@twitter.com
I got the same response from Alex awhile back (and I think confirmed by
Doug). And I'm seeing the same results, as well. I'm pretty sure it's
20,000 per IP without regard to user.
Jesse
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Dewald Pretorius dpr...@gmail.com wrote:
Just some background. I talked
Scott, I am for this week. Leaving back to my home in Salt Lake on Monday
though.
Jesse
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Scott Carter scarter28m-goo...@yahoo.comwrote:
I just posted an article that goes into quite a bit of detail about
how to create your own Twitter OAuth solution using Perl.
This is also another nick against OAuth. My users can't even log in right
now because we're relying on OAuth for login.
Jesse
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Dewald Pretorius dpr...@gmail.com wrote:
I have seen the same thing.
So, if you have white listed IPs that are still showing a rate
Why is Biz saying things are back in action when apps like mine, and many
other very large names are still broken from it. Sending this message to
users sends a false message to them stating they should expect we should be
up as well. At a very minimum, please state the API is still having
1 - 100 of 225 matches
Mail list logo
